Guest guest Posted June 16, 2001 Report Share Posted June 16, 2001 Dear Cristine, Perfect analysis. only difference is in following dates. All the events are in very short time. Here we can take the help of transit of Sun. Date of retirement is 30th Nov 1981, Remarriage is 28th Oct 1981, Death of 1st wife is 17th Apr 1981. krushna : > Dear Krushna > > I think I am now equipped to study your system properly, if you will help. > Starting with the 1/22/1922 male chart, which I imputed in the sensational > worksheet, I have tried to match sub dashas and event dates. > > Nov 24, 1946: marriage in ME-VE: In the 7th house, VE is NK, and has 19 pts., > which gives her power to act. Also, MA has 44 pts and VE acts for MA, > accelerating the date of marriage. Looked at from a different angle, VE is > conjunct the 7th lord in rasi and is the 7th lord from the MO, and she is 7th > lord in navamsha. > > Feb 2, 1948: 1st child in ME-SU: In the 5th house, SU has 19 pts and sits in > hse D, with 5 bindus, which gives him power to act. Also, MA has 44 pts, and > SU acts for MA, accelerating the date of birth. > > Dec 12, 1948: ME-MO: I think this is imprisonment, because MO has only 9 pts > for the 12th house of imprisonment. > > Sep 28, 1951: ME-RA: Should be able to give childbirth. RA is in ME's sign, > the MO's nakshatra, conjunct JU, NK and lord of D w/ 19 pts, and conjunct SA, > FK w/ 13 pts, looking at 5th house. ME 's dispositor is FK, ME is aspected > by NK and lord of D and ME has 17 pts. MO is disposited by MA who is lord of > E w/ 44 pts. ME does not act for MA because of the dasha sequence. > > April 17, 1981 and 28th Oct, 1981: VE-SA. One of the two dates has to be > death of 1st wife, since in the 2nd house [i.e. 8th of wife] SA is L12 and > has only 8 pts. I think the other date is retirement, because SA has only 9 > pts in the 12th, 8 pts in the 12th from the 10th [9th], plus his assets are > affected with only 8 pts in the 2nd. Of course, if we were to take the 7th > house for the 2nd marriage, then SA as lord of E w/ 19 pts could have given > marriage but I did not think VE-ME was giving retirement. . > > Nov 30, 1981: VE-ME: This would be the date of remarriage, taking the 2nd > house for remarriage. In the 2nd house, ME has 22 pts, and he is associated > w/ FK VE, and SU, lord of E. He is not acting for MA because of the sub dasha > sequence. > I also noticed the application of some yoga for remarriage mentioned in > worksheet. > > Hope I did not get it all wrong. > Regards > Christine Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 17, 2001 Report Share Posted June 17, 2001 Dear Krushna and list members Still on the Jan 22, 1922 man. Thank you Krushna for your answer. You write: Date of retirement is 30th Nov 1981, Remarriage is 28th Oct 1981, Death of 1st wife is 17th Apr 1981. I had no problem w/ the date of death of 1st wife, but I have some specific questions w/ respect to matching of retirement to the ME sub and of 2nd marriage to the SA sub., where I went wrong: 1. Which house do you use to see which sub lord will give 2nd marriage. If you use the 7th house, then I understand why SA sub works, but if we use the 2nd house for 2nd marriage, which I thought was the rule, then I don't understand how SA gives the 2nd marriage. 2. ME is good, w/ good points in all houses. As lord of E for the 12th hse, he has 19 pts., and can act for the 12th house. Assuming we take the 12th for retirement, and retirement is seen as a positive event, then it is ok. But assume he had been fired during course of employment, may I assume a planet w/ less than 12 pts would have been sub lord, but not ME? 3. Also, when we select the sub lord most likely to give the event, when more than one could give the event, do we select the one who has more "links" to the subject matter, here employment: is it an important consideration that ME is in samdharmi w/ MA, lord of 10 hse, and disposited by SA aspecting the 10th hse? Or is it irrelevant in your system? 4. As lord of D for 11th hse ME has 19pts. And he has 22 pts in the 2nd hse where he is conjunct lord of E. If retirement means less assets/income, why is ME a reliable indicator. I would have expected a sub lord with less than 12 pts in those houses. I will have to look at SU transits, but I would like first to understand this part completely, if you don't mind answering the above. Thank you, Krushna Christine Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.