Guest guest Posted July 20, 2001 Report Share Posted July 20, 2001 Respected Krushnaji, and List member, In a other group, there was discussion about a chart of a male having date of birth 4th Jan 1979, at 1-40 pm at Jamshedpur ( India) He married on 11th May 2001. The discussion was : How he married on that date? I tried the problem with AV system, and astonished to note the date he married is perfectly matches with your calculations, and the system tought by you. I must thank you, that you are giving this devine knowledge to us with out any selfishness. God will give you all the success and happiness in your life. your sishya, Prakash Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 21, 2001 Report Share Posted July 21, 2001 Hello Prakash, I can only agree with you about the system Krushna is teaching us. Also for me it is giving best results. I have nevertheless a question : Using Krushna's ayanamsha, I get asc at 29°55 Aries and such a degree is always delicate because it is so close to the next sign. Native was running Mercury/Moon By taking Aries asc Moon is lord of D and can give results because she has enough points. But Mercury as main lord is not involved and neither is the transit of the Sun (in Sun/Mars)at that moment. Therefore I suppose you worked with Taurus ascendent and then main lord Mercury is lord of A and aspects A. Moon is in C and transit of the Sun is in house of Lord B and E. Could you comment on this please Many thanks Margarita - varsh126 Friday, July 20, 2001 6:14 PM Date of Marriage, Respected Krushnaji, and List member, In a other group, there was discussion about a chart of a male having date of birth 4th Jan 1979, at 1-40 pm at Jamshedpur ( India)He married on 11th May 2001. The discussion was : How he married on that date? I tried the problem with AV system, and astonished to note the date he married is perfectly matches with your calculations, and the system tought by you. I must thank you, that you are giving this devine knowledge to us with out any selfishness. God will give you all the success and happiness in your life.your sishya,Prakash Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 21, 2001 Report Share Posted July 21, 2001 Dear Prakash, Your finding is very fine. Have you studied the chart in details. What this chart indicates in details. What difference we find in the system we follow and Generally Followed. Here the Jupiter is situated in 4th house in Cancer ( Uccha Rashi). The sight of such planet is considered to be benefic. Here Jupiter is with 7 points. And we take the sight of Such Jupiter as Malefic. This Jupiter aspects vENUS in 8th house. Venus aspects 2nd house and it is also with 7 points. So Venus looses 14 points for perticularly marriage. Venus is NK and FK for marriage. If we consider 1:7th relationship of Lagna, Moon, Venus we find Mars:Venus in 2:12 relationship, and Mercury : Jupiter are in 6:8 relationship. This reduces the happiness of the Marriage, and creats dispute. Husband and Wife can not have one opinion on any subject. The difference between Sun and Venus is more then 43 degree. Indicates the native will be having more contacts with opposite sex. This Venus is situated in the fourth place from Saturn, So helps Saturn. Such relations do not exist for long term. Special Note: When lord of D and/or E for fifth house, and lords of Dand or E for 7th house are samdharmi, the person marry to the person known to him. In this case Venus and Saturn are lord of D and E for 5th house, and Moon and Jupiter are lords of D and E for 7th house. If study these planets all are having some relation. Moon is samdharmi to Jupiter, Saturn, and Venus. So the person can marry with the person, already known to him. The person must have came in contact in Venus Sub period. This might have happened in 5th march to 15th March or 20th March to 3rd of Feb 98. We may add a period 15th of Jan to 25th Jan 98. This person ( native of the chart) must have difference of opinion, with his father. Mr. Prakash, Can you find out the fact in this case. In this system all results are based on Points gained in worksheet, and the individual points of the planet, their lordship, and their situation. I hope this will help other members to study the system. krushna , varsh126@h... wrote: > Respected Krushnaji, and List member, > > In a other group, there was discussion about a chart of a male > having date of birth 4th Jan 1979, at 1-40 pm at Jamshedpur ( India) > He married on 11th May 2001. > The discussion was : How he married on that date? > I tried the problem with AV system, and astonished to note the > date he married is perfectly matches with your calculations, and the > system tought by you. > I must thank you, that you are giving this devine knowledge to > us with out any selfishness. > God will give you all the success and happiness in your life. > your sishya, > Prakash Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 22, 2001 Report Share Posted July 22, 2001 Dear Margarita, I am interfering you and prakash, ( your mail is address to him). I found some point, where I should clarify you some thing. You say : Mercury is Main lord and not involved in transit...... Actually main lord is having very less importance. If it is involved in transit, it may be due to more points it achived, but not due to being main lord. Please read my answer to Cliff. How result obtained in Mercury main and Moon sub is explained. For Transit we consider other significator. Sun is the Samdharmi to Saturn and Mars is strong significator. Yes Jupiter is also strong, So it can also come forward. The chart shows delayed, but due to Saturn being in the constellation of FK,NK ( Venus) so delay is moderated. So result can be in the 2nd part of Moon sub period. You also mentioned the Ascendent is in the last degree, this is Delicate. But here the actual answer was known, and discussion was how it happened? So there is no point to suspect the time. Yes if such chart is coming for answer, we must go for both the ascendent. krushna , " Lettens " <dmlettens@s...> wrote: > Hello Prakash, > I can only agree with you about the system Krushna is teaching us. Also for me it is giving best results. I have nevertheless a question : > Using Krushna's ayanamsha, I get asc at 29°55 Aries and such a degree is always delicate because it is so close to the next sign. > Native was running Mercury/Moon > By taking Aries asc Moon is lord of D and can give results because she has enough points. But Mercury as main lord is not involved and neither is the transit of the Sun (in Sun/Mars)at that moment. > Therefore I suppose you worked with Taurus ascendent and then main lord Mercury is lord of A and aspects A. Moon is in C and transit of the Sun is in house of Lord B and E. > Could you comment on this please > Many thanks > Margarita > - > varsh126@h... > > Friday, July 20, 2001 6:14 PM > Date of Marriage, > > > Respected Krushnaji, and List member, > > In a other group, there was discussion about a chart of a male > having date of birth 4th Jan 1979, at 1-40 pm at Jamshedpur ( India) > He married on 11th May 2001. > The discussion was : How he married on that date? > I tried the problem with AV system, and astonished to note the > date he married is perfectly matches with your calculations, and the > system tought by you. > I must thank you, that you are giving this devine knowledge to > us with out any selfishness. > God will give you all the success and happiness in your life. > your sishya, > Prakash > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 22, 2001 Report Share Posted July 22, 2001 Respected Krushnaji, Pranam, Thank you very much for giving your valuable time, and for explainiong in details. I will give the information asked by you, if I get it. Thanks Prahash , krushanain wrote: > Dear Prakash, > Your finding is very fine. Have you studied the chart in > details. What this chart indicates in details. What difference we > find in the system we follow and Generally Followed. Here the > Jupiter is situated in 4th house in Cancer ( Uccha Rashi). The sight > of such planet is considered to be benefic. Here Jupiter is with 7 > points. And we take the sight of Such Jupiter as Malefic. > This Jupiter aspects vENUS in 8th house. Venus aspects 2nd > house and it is also with 7 points. So Venus looses 14 points for > perticularly marriage. Venus is NK and FK for marriage. > If we consider 1:7th relationship of Lagna, Moon, Venus we > find Mars:Venus in 2:12 relationship, and Mercury : Jupiter are in > 6:8 relationship. This reduces the happiness of the Marriage, and > creats dispute. Husband and Wife can not have one opinion on any > subject. > The difference between Sun and Venus is more then 43 degree. > Indicates the native will be having more contacts with opposite sex. > This Venus is situated in the fourth place from Saturn, So helps > Saturn. Such relations do not exist for long term. > Special Note: > When lord of D and/or E for fifth house, and lords of Dand or > E for 7th house are samdharmi, the person marry to the person known > to him. In this case Venus and Saturn are lord of D and E for 5th > house, and Moon and Jupiter are lords of D and E for 7th house. If > study these planets all are having some relation. Moon is samdharmi > to Jupiter, Saturn, and Venus. So the person can marry with the > person, already known to him. The person must have came in contact in > Venus Sub period. This might have happened in 5th march to 15th March > or 20th March to 3rd of Feb 98. We may add a period 15th of Jan to > 25th Jan 98. > This person ( native of the chart) must have difference of > opinion, with his father. > Mr. Prakash, Can you find out the fact in this case. > In this system all results are based on Points gained in > worksheet, and the individual points of the planet, their lordship, > and their situation. > I hope this will help other members to study the system. > krushna > , varsh126@h... wrote: > > Respected Krushnaji, and List member, > > > > In a other group, there was discussion about a chart of a > male > > having date of birth 4th Jan 1979, at 1-40 pm at Jamshedpur ( > India) > > He married on 11th May 2001. > > The discussion was : How he married on that date? > > I tried the problem with AV system, and astonished to note the > > date he married is perfectly matches with your calculations, and > the > > system tought by you. > > I must thank you, that you are giving this devine knowledge to > > us with out any selfishness. > > God will give you all the success and happiness in your life. > > your sishya, > > Prakash Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 22, 2001 Report Share Posted July 22, 2001 Respected Margaritaji, Namaste, I respect you, and always read your mail in this list. I must appreciate your deep knowledge, and study in the system. I do not want to cross you. I will study the chart with Taurus ascendend. With Regards Prakash , " Lettens " <dmlettens@s...> wrote: > Hello Prakash, > I can only agree with you about the system Krushna is teaching us. Also for me it is giving best results. I have nevertheless a question : > Using Krushna's ayanamsha, I get asc at 29°55 Aries and such a degree is always delicate because it is so close to the next sign. > Native was running Mercury/Moon > By taking Aries asc Moon is lord of D and can give results because she has enough points. But Mercury as main lord is not involved and neither is the transit of the Sun (in Sun/Mars)at that moment. > Therefore I suppose you worked with Taurus ascendent and then main lord Mercury is lord of A and aspects A. Moon is in C and transit of the Sun is in house of Lord B and E. > Could you comment on this please > Many thanks > Margarita > - > varsh126@h... > > Friday, July 20, 2001 6:14 PM > Date of Marriage, > > > Respected Krushnaji, and List member, > > In a other group, there was discussion about a chart of a male > having date of birth 4th Jan 1979, at 1-40 pm at Jamshedpur ( India) > He married on 11th May 2001. > The discussion was : How he married on that date? > I tried the problem with AV system, and astonished to note the > date he married is perfectly matches with your calculations, and the > system tought by you. > I must thank you, that you are giving this devine knowledge to > us with out any selfishness. > God will give you all the success and happiness in your life. > your sishya, > Prakash > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 23, 2001 Report Share Posted July 23, 2001 Thank you Krushna for the comments, Yes I went through your comments to Cliff's mail, but still, even if I'm convinced of the accuracy of the system, I realize that I still lack a lot of knowledge. By doing exercices like this and getting the feed back I suppose I'll learn with time and patience. Thanks once more Margarita - krushanain Sunday, July 22, 2001 5:43 PM Re: Date of Marriage, Dear Margarita, I am interfering you and prakash, ( your mail is address to him). I found some point, where I should clarify you some thing. You say : Mercury is Main lord and not involved in transit...... Actually main lord is having very less importance. If it is involved in transit, it may be due to more points it achived, but not due to being main lord. Please read my answer to Cliff. How result obtained in Mercury main and Moon sub is explained. For Transit we consider other significator. Sun is the Samdharmi to Saturn and Mars is strong significator. Yes Jupiter is also strong, So it can also come forward. The chart shows delayed, but due to Saturn being in the constellation of FK,NK ( Venus) so delay is moderated. So result can be in the 2nd part of Moon sub period. You also mentioned the Ascendent is in the last degree, this is Delicate. But here the actual answer was known, and discussion was how it happened? So there is no point to suspect the time. Yes if such chart is coming for answer, we must go for both the ascendent. krushna , "Lettens" <dmlettens@s...> wrote:> Hello Prakash,> I can only agree with you about the system Krushna is teaching us. Also for me it is giving best results. I have nevertheless a question :> Using Krushna's ayanamsha, I get asc at 29°55 Aries and such a degree is always delicate because it is so close to the next sign.> Native was running Mercury/Moon> By taking Aries asc Moon is lord of D and can give results because she has enough points. But Mercury as main lord is not involved and neither is the transit of the Sun (in Sun/Mars)at that moment.> Therefore I suppose you worked with Taurus ascendent and then main lord Mercury is lord of A and aspects A. Moon is in C and transit of the Sun is in house of Lord B and E. > Could you comment on this please> Many thanks> Margarita> - > varsh126@h... > > Friday, July 20, 2001 6:14 PM> Date of Marriage,> > > Respected Krushnaji, and List member,> > In a other group, there was discussion about a chart of a male > having date of birth 4th Jan 1979, at 1-40 pm at Jamshedpur ( India)> He married on 11th May 2001. > The discussion was : How he married on that date?> I tried the problem with AV system, and astonished to note the > date he married is perfectly matches with your calculations, and the > system tought by you. > I must thank you, that you are giving this devine knowledge to > us with out any selfishness. > God will give you all the success and happiness in your life.> your sishya,> Prakash > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 23, 2001 Report Share Posted July 23, 2001 Hello, No need to study the chart with Taurus asc. I think mails create sometimes confusion or else did I not explain myself clearly. I went through Krushna's mail, realized the error I made and things are clear now. Thanks for answering and I didn't feel crossed at all. Perhaps my way of saying things is a little straight foreward but don't worry about that. Best regards Margarita - varsh126 Sunday, July 22, 2001 8:57 PM Re: Date of Marriage, Respected Margaritaji,Namaste, I respect you, and always read your mail in this list. I must appreciate your deep knowledge, and study in the system. I do not want to cross you. I will study the chart with Taurus ascendend. With RegardsPrakash, "Lettens" <dmlettens@s...> wrote:> Hello Prakash,> I can only agree with you about the system Krushna is teaching us. Also for me it is giving best results. I have nevertheless a question :> Using Krushna's ayanamsha, I get asc at 29°55 Aries and such a degree is always delicate because it is so close to the next sign.> Native was running Mercury/Moon> By taking Aries asc Moon is lord of D and can give results because she has enough points. But Mercury as main lord is not involved and neither is the transit of the Sun (in Sun/Mars)at that moment.> Therefore I suppose you worked with Taurus ascendent and then main lord Mercury is lord of A and aspects A. Moon is in C and transit of the Sun is in house of Lord B and E. > Could you comment on this please> Many thanks> Margarita> - > varsh126@h... > > Friday, July 20, 2001 6:14 PM> Date of Marriage,> > > Respected Krushnaji, and List member,> > In a other group, there was discussion about a chart of a male > having date of birth 4th Jan 1979, at 1-40 pm at Jamshedpur ( India)> He married on 11th May 2001. > The discussion was : How he married on that date?> I tried the problem with AV system, and astonished to note the > date he married is perfectly matches with your calculations, and the > system tought by you. > I must thank you, that you are giving this devine knowledge to > us with out any selfishness. > God will give you all the success and happiness in your life.> your sishya,> Prakash > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 23, 2001 Report Share Posted July 23, 2001 Dear Krushnaji, I need to correct Prakash . The native got married on the 21st May 2001 and not on the 11th May 2001. Does this change things ? I would like to point out the a couple of observations about the time of birth being inaccurate : 1 ) The severe affliction of Rahu upon Sun. 2 ) The Navamsha Both points do not show his father’s very wealthy background Best regards, Swee -----Original Message----- krushanain [krushanain] 22 July 2001 17:44 To: Subject: Re: Date of Marriage, Dear Margarita, I am interfering you and prakash, ( your mail is address to him). I found some point, where I should clarify you some thing. You say : Mercury is Main lord and not involved in transit...... Actually main lord is having very less importance. If it is involved in transit, it may be due to more points it achived, but not due to being main lord. Please read my answer to Cliff. How result obtained in Mercury main and Moon sub is explained. For Transit we consider other significator. Sun is the Samdharmi to Saturn and Mars is strong significator. Yes Jupiter is also strong, So it can also come forward. The chart shows delayed, but due to Saturn being in the constellation of FK,NK ( Venus) so delay is moderated. So result can be in the 2nd part of Moon sub period. You also mentioned the Ascendent is in the last degree, this is Delicate. But here the actual answer was known, and discussion was how it happened? So there is no point to suspect the time. Yes if such chart is coming for answer, we must go for both the ascendent. krushna , " Lettens " <dmlettens@s...> wrote: > Hello Prakash, > I can only agree with you about the system Krushna is teaching us. Also for me it is giving best results. I have nevertheless a question : > Using Krushna's ayanamsha, I get asc at 29°55 Aries and such a degree is always delicate because it is so close to the next sign. > Native was running Mercury/Moon > By taking Aries asc Moon is lord of D and can give results because she has enough points. But Mercury as main lord is not involved and neither is the transit of the Sun (in Sun/Mars)at that moment. > Therefore I suppose you worked with Taurus ascendent and then main lord Mercury is lord of A and aspects A. Moon is in C and transit of the Sun is in house of Lord B and E. > Could you comment on this please > Many thanks > Margarita > - > varsh126@h... > > Friday, July 20, 2001 6:14 PM > Date of Marriage, > > > Respected Krushnaji, and List member, > > In a other group, there was discussion about a chart of a male > having date of birth 4th Jan 1979, at 1-40 pm at Jamshedpur ( India) > He married on 11th May 2001. > The discussion was : How he married on that date? > I tried the problem with AV system, and astonished to note the > date he married is perfectly matches with your calculations, and the > system tought by you. > I must thank you, that you are giving this devine knowledge to > us with out any selfishness. > God will give you all the success and happiness in your life. > your sishya, > Prakash > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 23, 2001 Report Share Posted July 23, 2001 Dear Swee, The Date given by Prakash is 11th may for the marriage of the person. If it is 21st May, then transit of Sun will be in Constellation of Sun and Sign of Venus. Venus here is aspecting 2nd house, As it is FK and NK, it's sight may not be taken as very serious. From your mail it seems that he is son of a wealthy father. For this we should consider 11, 2nd, 6th and 7th house. Points are 29,33,33,33 . Which indicates good financial status of father, and doing own business. As for as we consider the affliction of Sun due to Rahu, So it will be same for next 3/4 days. Even the time of birth will not change this. Yes, one minit difference will change the Ascendent, So sight of Rahu will not be on 9th. But it will effect the Saturn which will be 10th lord. With this theory, affliction of 9th lord or Sun, will not be changed for last two hours and next 4 hours. As for as the navamansha chart is conserned, For next 3 days both will remain in the same navamansha. Dear Swee, this part of Vedic do not appeal to me. Applying the same, We can see here the Jupiter lord of 9th house is in it's Uccha Rashi, and is with 7 points. Which can alsdo indicate good status of father. With this time, finencial status of father is indicated to be a wealthy person. Now if the date of marriage is 21st May, Then it is not coming as per our calculations. Yes As per my experience, the date of marriage many a times have as difference of 13 days on both sides. Still I am not aware of the reason of that. So we should take it in that way. As for as time of birth is concerned, I can say it may be on negative side. The rounded up time always have some difference. But As the father of the person is having good finencial status, I should say it can not be delayed then this time. Dear Prakash, can you put some light on date of marriage. thanks krushna , " Swee Chan " <swee@c...> wrote: > Dear Krushnaji, > > I need to correct Prakash . The native got married on the 21st May 2001 and > not on the 11th May 2001. > > Does this change things ? > > I would like to point out the a couple of observations about the time of > birth being inaccurate : > 1 ) The severe affliction of Rahu upon Sun. > 2 ) The Navamsha > Both points do not show his father's very wealthy background > > Best regards, Swee > > > > > > krushanain@h... [krushanain@h...] > 22 July 2001 17:44 > > Re: Date of Marriage, > > Dear Margarita, > I am interfering you and prakash, ( your mail is address to > him). I found some point, where I should clarify you some thing. > You say : Mercury is Main lord and not involved in > transit...... > Actually main lord is having very less importance. If it is > involved in transit, it may be due to more points it achived, but not > due to being main lord. > Please read my answer to Cliff. How result obtained in Mercury > main and Moon sub is explained. > For Transit we consider other significator. Sun is the > Samdharmi to Saturn and Mars is strong significator. Yes Jupiter is > also strong, So it can also come forward. > The chart shows delayed, but due to Saturn being in the > constellation of FK,NK ( Venus) so delay is moderated. So result can > be in the 2nd part of Moon sub period. > You also mentioned the Ascendent is in the last degree, this > is Delicate. But here the actual answer was known, and discussion was > how it happened? So there is no point to suspect the time. Yes if > such chart is coming for answer, we must go for both the ascendent. > krushna > > , " Lettens " <dmlettens@s...> > wrote: > > Hello Prakash, > > I can only agree with you about the system Krushna is teaching us. > Also for me it is giving best results. I have nevertheless a > question : > > Using Krushna's ayanamsha, I get asc at 29°55 Aries and such a > degree is always delicate because it is so close to the next sign. > > Native was running Mercury/Moon > > By taking Aries asc Moon is lord of D and can give results because > she has enough points. But Mercury as main lord is not involved and > neither is the transit of the Sun (in Sun/Mars)at that moment. > > Therefore I suppose you worked with Taurus ascendent and then main > lord Mercury is lord of A and aspects A. Moon is in C and transit of > the Sun is in house of Lord B and E. > > Could you comment on this please > > Many thanks > > Margarita > > - > > varsh126@h... > > > > Friday, July 20, 2001 6:14 PM > > Date of Marriage, > > > > > > Respected Krushnaji, and List member, > > > > In a other group, there was discussion about a chart of a > male > > having date of birth 4th Jan 1979, at 1-40 pm at Jamshedpur ( > India) > > He married on 11th May 2001. > > The discussion was : How he married on that date? > > I tried the problem with AV system, and astonished to note > the > > date he married is perfectly matches with your calculations, and > the > > system tought by you. > > I must thank you, that you are giving this devine knowledge > to > > us with out any selfishness. > > God will give you all the success and happiness in your life. > > your sishya, > > Prakash > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 23, 2001 Report Share Posted July 23, 2001 Dear Margarita, I am very much satisfied with your study. More and more practice makes the person perfect. The astrology is a very vast subject, and no body can be perfect. You can solve some charts with known results, which will increase your practice. If any body is coming to you for your advice, then instead of going direct on the question, ask some events of past life, check them, If those are in line, then go for the question. This will increase your practice. Now solving the chart have been made easy by Sanjay and Donna, They have given a valuable computerised Worksheet, Which gives detailed calculation in very less time. Yes, I remember how much time it was taking to calculate. It was a tiresome job, doing all things manually and very time consuming. I will try to give more examples, but limited time available with me, makes it difficult. I am unable to answer so many mail, and request. Any how we must hope to do better things. thanks krushna , " Lettens " <dmlettens@s...> wrote: > Thank you Krushna for the comments, Yes I went through your comments to Cliff's mail, but still, even if I'm convinced of the accuracy of the system, I realize that I still lack a lot of knowledge. By doing exercices like this and getting the feed back I suppose I'll learn with time and patience. > Thanks once more > Margarita > - > krushanain@h... > > Sunday, July 22, 2001 5:43 PM > Re: Date of Marriage, > > > Dear Margarita, > I am interfering you and prakash, ( your mail is address to > him). I found some point, where I should clarify you some thing. > You say : Mercury is Main lord and not involved in > transit...... > Actually main lord is having very less importance. If it is > involved in transit, it may be due to more points it achived, but not > due to being main lord. > Please read my answer to Cliff. How result obtained in Mercury > main and Moon sub is explained. > For Transit we consider other significator. Sun is the > Samdharmi to Saturn and Mars is strong significator. Yes Jupiter is > also strong, So it can also come forward. > The chart shows delayed, but due to Saturn being in the > constellation of FK,NK ( Venus) so delay is moderated. So result can > be in the 2nd part of Moon sub period. > You also mentioned the Ascendent is in the last degree, this > is Delicate. But here the actual answer was known, and discussion was > how it happened? So there is no point to suspect the time. Yes if > such chart is coming for answer, we must go for both the ascendent. > krushna > > , " Lettens " <dmlettens@s...> > wrote: > > Hello Prakash, > > I can only agree with you about the system Krushna is teaching us. > Also for me it is giving best results. I have nevertheless a > question : > > Using Krushna's ayanamsha, I get asc at 29°55 Aries and such a > degree is always delicate because it is so close to the next sign. > > Native was running Mercury/Moon > > By taking Aries asc Moon is lord of D and can give results because > she has enough points. But Mercury as main lord is not involved and > neither is the transit of the Sun (in Sun/Mars)at that moment. > > Therefore I suppose you worked with Taurus ascendent and then main > lord Mercury is lord of A and aspects A. Moon is in C and transit of > the Sun is in house of Lord B and E. > > Could you comment on this please > > Many thanks > > Margarita > > - > > varsh126@h... > > > > Friday, July 20, 2001 6:14 PM > > Date of Marriage, > > > > > > Respected Krushnaji, and List member, > > > > In a other group, there was discussion about a chart of a > male > > having date of birth 4th Jan 1979, at 1-40 pm at Jamshedpur ( > India) > > He married on 11th May 2001. > > The discussion was : How he married on that date? > > I tried the problem with AV system, and astonished to note > the > > date he married is perfectly matches with your calculations, and > the > > system tought by you. > > I must thank you, that you are giving this devine knowledge > to > > us with out any selfishness. > > God will give you all the success and happiness in your life. > > your sishya, > > Prakash > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 23, 2001 Report Share Posted July 23, 2001 Dear Krushnaji, I did an analysis for this particular chart. The date of marriage is correct for 21st May 2001. I would like to correct the time to 1:31pm. The original time of birth was given as 1:40pm Things change variedly with this time. Please have a look. Rahu also gives exponential growth to Sun, in 9th house And Navamsa lagna changes. I am a lot more comfortable with the birth time after a few adjustments, and certain that the period is Sun –Ve, which also fits in the Navamsa. An excerpt of the discussion from another list: [Dear Swee, Hats off to you first of all ! After reading your email, I just rang up the person whose chart we are discussing. Well, it seems you got most of the things correctly. As he tells me, it was indeed a love affair resulting in marriage - something I was unaware of up until now – He did marry a person from outside the caste - as he is a Gujarati (a region on the east coast of India) whereas the wife is a Punjabi (a region north of India) - there is a lot of cultural difference. So that is the impact of Rahu in the 5th house. You are right again - I didn't take the Navamsa into account. So the picture is indeed much clearer to me now.] Best regards, Swee -----Original Message----- krushanain [krushanain] 23 July 2001 21:59 To: Subject: Re: Date of Marriage, Dear Swee, The Date given by Prakash is 11th may for the marriage of the person. If it is 21st May, then transit of Sun will be in Constellation of Sun and Sign of Venus. Venus here is aspecting 2nd house, As it is FK and NK, it's sight may not be taken as very serious. From your mail it seems that he is son of a wealthy father. For this we should consider 11, 2nd, 6th and 7th house. Points are 29,33,33,33 . Which indicates good financial status of father, and doing own business. As for as we consider the affliction of Sun due to Rahu, So it will be same for next 3/4 days. Even the time of birth will not change this. Yes, one minit difference will change the Ascendent, So sight of Rahu will not be on 9th. But it will effect the Saturn which will be 10th lord. With this theory, affliction of 9th lord or Sun, will not be changed for last two hours and next 4 hours. As for as the navamansha chart is conserned, For next 3 days both will remain in the same navamansha. Dear Swee, this part of Vedic do not appeal to me. Applying the same, We can see here the Jupiter lord of 9th house is in it's Uccha Rashi, and is with 7 points. Which can alsdo indicate good status of father. With this time, finencial status of father is indicated to be a wealthy person. Now if the date of marriage is 21st May, Then it is not coming as per our calculations. Yes As per my experience, the date of marriage many a times have as difference of 13 days on both sides. Still I am not aware of the reason of that. So we should take it in that way. As for as time of birth is concerned, I can say it may be on negative side. The rounded up time always have some difference. But As the father of the person is having good finencial status, I should say it can not be delayed then this time. Dear Prakash, can you put some light on date of marriage. thanks krushna , " Swee Chan " <swee@c...> wrote: > Dear Krushnaji, > > I need to correct Prakash . The native got married on the 21st May 2001 and > not on the 11th May 2001. > > Does this change things ? > > I would like to point out the a couple of observations about the time of > birth being inaccurate : > 1 ) The severe affliction of Rahu upon Sun. > 2 ) The Navamsha > Both points do not show his father's very wealthy background > > Best regards, Swee > > > > > > krushanain@h... [krushanain@h...] > 22 July 2001 17:44 > > Re: Date of Marriage, > > Dear Margarita, > I am interfering you and prakash, ( your mail is address to > him). I found some point, where I should clarify you some thing. > You say : Mercury is Main lord and not involved in > transit...... > Actually main lord is having very less importance. If it is > involved in transit, it may be due to more points it achived, but not > due to being main lord. > Please read my answer to Cliff. How result obtained in Mercury > main and Moon sub is explained. > For Transit we consider other significator. Sun is the > Samdharmi to Saturn and Mars is strong significator. Yes Jupiter is > also strong, So it can also come forward. > The chart shows delayed, but due to Saturn being in the > constellation of FK,NK ( Venus) so delay is moderated. So result can > be in the 2nd part of Moon sub period. > You also mentioned the Ascendent is in the last degree, this > is Delicate. But here the actual answer was known, and discussion was > how it happened? So there is no point to suspect the time. Yes if > such chart is coming for answer, we must go for both the ascendent. > krushna > > , " Lettens " <dmlettens@s...> > wrote: > > Hello Prakash, > > I can only agree with you about the system Krushna is teaching us. > Also for me it is giving best results. I have nevertheless a > question : > > Using Krushna's ayanamsha, I get asc at 29°55 Aries and such a > degree is always delicate because it is so close to the next sign. > > Native was running Mercury/Moon > > By taking Aries asc Moon is lord of D and can give results because > she has enough points. But Mercury as main lord is not involved and > neither is the transit of the Sun (in Sun/Mars)at that moment. > > Therefore I suppose you worked with Taurus ascendent and then main > lord Mercury is lord of A and aspects A. Moon is in C and transit of > the Sun is in house of Lord B and E. > > Could you comment on this please > > Many thanks > > Margarita > > - > > varsh126@h... > > > > Friday, July 20, 2001 6:14 PM > > Date of Marriage, > > > > > > Respected Krushnaji, and List member, > > > > In a other group, there was discussion about a chart of a > male > > having date of birth 4th Jan 1979, at 1-40 pm at Jamshedpur ( > India) > > He married on 11th May 2001. > > The discussion was : How he married on that date? > > I tried the problem with AV system, and astonished to note > the > > date he married is perfectly matches with your calculations, and > the > > system tought by you. > > I must thank you, that you are giving this devine knowledge > to > > us with out any selfishness. > > God will give you all the success and happiness in your life. > > your sishya, > > Prakash > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 24, 2001 Report Share Posted July 24, 2001 Swee, Krushnaji and other list members, The date of marriage is 11th may 2001, Please refer Satva Group message no 15538. Thanks, Prakash , " Swee Chan " <swee@c...> wrote: > Dear Krushnaji, > > I did an analysis for this particular chart. The date of marriage is correct > for 21st May 2001. > > I would like to correct the time to 1:31pm. The original time of birth was > given as 1:40pm > > Things change variedly with this time. Please have a look. > Rahu also gives exponential growth to Sun, in 9th house > And Navamsa lagna changes. I am a lot more comfortable with the birth time > after a few adjustments, and certain that the period is Sun –Ve, which also > fits in the Navamsa. > > An excerpt of the discussion from another list: > > [Dear Swee, > > Hats off to you first of all ! > After reading your email, I just rang up the person whose chart we are > discussing. Well, it seems you got most of the things correctly. As he tells > me, it was indeed a love affair resulting in marriage - > something I was unaware of up until now – > > He did marry a person from outside the caste - as he is a Gujarati (a region > on the east coast of India) whereas the wife is a Punjabi (a > region north of India) - there is a lot of cultural difference. So that is > the impact of Rahu in the 5th house. > You are right again - I didn't take the Navamsa into account. So the picture > is indeed much clearer to me now.] > > Best regards, > > Swee > > krushanain [krushanain] > 23 July 2001 21:59 > > Re: Date of Marriage, > > Dear Swee, > The Date given by Prakash is 11th may for the marriage of the > person. If it is 21st May, then transit of Sun will be in > Constellation of Sun and Sign of Venus. Venus here is aspecting 2nd > house, As it is FK and NK, it's sight may not be taken as very > serious. > From your mail it seems that he is son of a wealthy father. > For this we should consider 11, 2nd, 6th and 7th house. Points are > 29,33,33,33 . Which indicates good financial status of father, and > doing own business. > As for as we consider the affliction of Sun due to Rahu, So it > will be same for next 3/4 days. Even the time of birth will not > change this. Yes, one minit difference will change the Ascendent, So > sight of Rahu will not be on 9th. But it will effect the Saturn which > will be 10th lord. With this theory, affliction of 9th lord or Sun, > will not be changed for last two hours and next 4 hours. > As for as the navamansha chart is conserned, For next 3 days both > will remain in the same navamansha. > Dear Swee, this part of Vedic do not appeal to me. > Applying the same, We can see here the Jupiter lord of 9th house > is in it's Uccha Rashi, and is with 7 points. Which can alsdo > indicate good status of father. > With this time, finencial status of father is indicated to be a > wealthy person. > Now if the date of marriage is 21st May, Then it is not coming > as per our calculations. Yes As per my experience, the date of > marriage many a times have as difference of 13 days on both sides. > Still I am not aware of the reason of that. So we should take it in > that way. > As for as time of birth is concerned, I can say it may be on > negative side. The rounded up time always have some difference. But > As the father of the person is having good finencial status, I should > say it can not be delayed then this time. > Dear Prakash, can you put some light on date of marriage. > thanks > krushna > > , " Swee Chan " <swee@c...> wrote: > > Dear Krushnaji, > > > > I need to correct Prakash . The native got married on the 21st May > 2001 and > > not on the 11th May 2001. > > > > Does this change things ? > > > > I would like to point out the a couple of observations about the > time of > > birth being inaccurate : > > 1 ) The severe affliction of Rahu upon Sun. > > 2 ) The Navamsha > > Both points do not show his father's very wealthy background > > > > Best regards, Swee > > > > > > > > > > > > krushanain@h... [krushanain@h...] > > 22 July 2001 17:44 > > > > Re: Date of Marriage, > > > > Dear Margarita, > > I am interfering you and prakash, ( your mail is address to > > him). I found some point, where I should clarify you some thing. > > You say : Mercury is Main lord and not involved in > > transit...... > > Actually main lord is having very less importance. If it is > > involved in transit, it may be due to more points it achived, but > not > > due to being main lord. > > Please read my answer to Cliff. How result obtained in > Mercury > > main and Moon sub is explained. > > For Transit we consider other significator. Sun is the > > Samdharmi to Saturn and Mars is strong significator. Yes Jupiter is > > also strong, So it can also come forward. > > The chart shows delayed, but due to Saturn being in the > > constellation of FK,NK ( Venus) so delay is moderated. So result can > > be in the 2nd part of Moon sub period. > > You also mentioned the Ascendent is in the last degree, this > > is Delicate. But here the actual answer was known, and discussion > was > > how it happened? So there is no point to suspect the time. Yes if > > such chart is coming for answer, we must go for both the ascendent. > > krushna > > > > , " Lettens " <dmlettens@s...> > > wrote: > > > Hello Prakash, > > > I can only agree with you about the system Krushna is teaching us. > > Also for me it is giving best results. I have nevertheless a > > question : > > > Using Krushna's ayanamsha, I get asc at 29°55 Aries and such a > > degree is always delicate because it is so close to the next sign. > > > Native was running Mercury/Moon > > > By taking Aries asc Moon is lord of D and can give results because > > she has enough points. But Mercury as main lord is not involved and > > neither is the transit of the Sun (in Sun/Mars)at that moment. > > > Therefore I suppose you worked with Taurus ascendent and then main > > lord Mercury is lord of A and aspects A. Moon is in C and transit of > > the Sun is in house of Lord B and E. > > > Could you comment on this please > > > Many thanks > > > Margarita > > > - > > > varsh126@h... > > > > > > Friday, July 20, 2001 6:14 PM > > > Date of Marriage, > > > > > > > > > Respected Krushnaji, and List member, > > > > > > In a other group, there was discussion about a chart of a > > male > > > having date of birth 4th Jan 1979, at 1-40 pm at Jamshedpur ( > > India) > > > He married on 11th May 2001. > > > The discussion was : How he married on that date? > > > I tried the problem with AV system, and astonished to note > > the > > > date he married is perfectly matches with your calculations, and > > the > > > system tought by you. > > > I must thank you, that you are giving this devine knowledge > > to > > > us with out any selfishness. > > > God will give you all the success and happiness in your > life. > > > your sishya, > > > Prakash > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.