Guest guest Posted October 15, 2001 Report Share Posted October 15, 2001 Hello Sandy, To answer your question about the relationship between dasha and bukhti lord, I think I got it wrong also. I remembered Krushna saying something about that but couldn't find the message back. Now I found it and it was written in a comment on Donna's chart with subject " death of the father " , dated september 30. Well, there he states that : " the lord of A should be connected to the main dasha lord " . So I better check the charts again ! I have the impression that the more I learn the more things become complicated, unless it's me ?? Best regards Margarita Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 15, 2001 Report Share Posted October 15, 2001 Dear Margarita and Sandy, We do not consider the relations between Main lord and Sub lord. There is no effect if they are in 6:8 or 2:12 relation. In the case of " Death " , it can not happen in sub of powerful significator, in any main period. For this case the Main lord should be sumdharmi to Lord of 3rd house from the house represented the person. In other words the lord of 'A'( for 8th house " B " ) should be sumdharmi to Main period lord. krushna , " dmlettens " <dmlettens@s...> wrote: > Hello Sandy, > To answer your question about the relationship between dasha and bukhti > lord, I think I got it wrong also. I remembered Krushna saying something > about that but couldn't find the message back. Now I found it and it was > written in a comment on Donna's chart with subject " death of the father " , > dated september 30. > Well, there he states that : " the lord of A should be connected to the main > dasha lord " . > So I better check the charts again ! I have the impression that the more I > learn the more things become complicated, unless it's me ?? > Best regards > Margarita Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 16, 2001 Report Share Posted October 16, 2001 Thanks so much Krushna. Yes I was confused but got it right. I have to go through the divorce charts again. Best regards Margarita krushanain [krushanain]Monday, October 15, 2001 7:42 PM Subject: Re: dasha and bukti lordDear Margarita and Sandy, We do not consider the relations between Main lord and Sub lord. There is no effect if they are in 6:8 or 2:12 relation. In the case of "Death", it can not happen in sub of powerful significator, in any main period. For this case the Main lord should be sumdharmi to Lord of 3rd house from the house represented the person. In other words the lord of 'A'( for 8th house"B" ) should be sumdharmi to Main period lord. krushna , "dmlettens" <dmlettens@s...> wrote:> Hello Sandy,> To answer your question about the relationship between dasha and bukhti> lord, I think I got it wrong also. I remembered Krushna saying something> about that but couldn't find the message back. Now I found it and it was> written in a comment on Donna's chart with subject "death of the father",> dated september 30.> Well, there he states that : "the lord of A should be connected to the main> dasha lord".> So I better check the charts again ! I have the impression that the more I> learn the more things become complicated, unless it's me ??> Best regards> Margarita Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.