Guest guest Posted October 17, 2001 Report Share Posted October 17, 2001 Respected Krushnaji, I need some clarifications on this. I hope you will be able to find time to provide these soon. 1. When you define natural samdharmis, you mention Moon and Mars, and Sun and Mars as natural samdharmis apart from Saturn and Venus. I have no question about Saturn and Venus. However, we had some discussion about the others some months ago. You had mentioned that planet A owning the 4th house from planet B becomes samdharmi to planet B. This means that it can give the result for B (provided other conditions are met and the planets A and B do not own mutually opposing houses). However, B cannot give the result for A. In other words, B commands A so A has to do B's work but the reverse is not true. In the case of Saturn and Venus, each owns the 4th house from the other so they are mutual samdharmis. However, in the case of Mars with the luminaries, Mars commands Moon but is commanded by Sun. As such, these are not mutual samdharmis but a one sided relation. In this case, Moon can stand in for Mars but Mars will not stand in for Moon (unless they are samdharmi due to some other reason). Similarly, Mars will give the result for Sun but Sun would not give the result for Mars. Please advise if this is correct or not. 2. You mention that when planets are opposing, then the planet with 4 or more points will not act as samdharmi to the other planet. However, the planet with less than 4 points will act as samdharmi. Is this true for only natural samdharmis or also for the functional ones? Also, planets if they are samdharmi because of some other reason, does one stop acting like samdharmi to the other if it is malefically aspected by the other one because of some aspect other than the 7th? I hope my question is clear. 3. In the order of the strength of samdharmi relations (point 5 of the lesson), you have only defined this for functional samdharmis. What is the strength of natural samdharmiship? 4. In point 9, you have mentioned about Jupiter. Is this only for marriage or true for all affairs in general. That is, is Jupiter in Libra bad for all affairs or only for marriage? I think in your previous mails, it was only for marriage. I just want to reconfirm. 5. In point 10, you mention that the 6th lord (except for house 1 and 9), will not act as samdharmi to any planet. However, in previous clarifications, you have generally spared Sun and Moon from the defects of 6th lord. Is that exception for Sun and Moon valid here also? That is, do Sun and Moon act as samdharmi even if they are 6th lords? 6. In point 11, you say that any planet getting any points from 6th lord will not act as samdharmi. Is this for all houses? Also, do Sun and Moon have a special status here if 6th lords? What if the planet is samdharmi to the 6th lord itself? Will it not act for the 6th lord? What about a planet which is conjunct the 6th lord? Will it not act as a samdharmi to any other planet? 7. You mention the same restrictions for the lord of 12th from B as for the 6th lord. What about the Sun and Moon? Are they exceptions? 8. We know from earlier lessons that the most malefic planet in a house gets the points of the planet/s in 4th from it. However, for samdharmi relationship, is the planet in 4th samdharmi to every planet in the 10th with less than 4 points or only to the most malefic one? As you see, if I want to confuse myself, I can find many ways :-) Hopefully you would shed some light. Kind regards Sanjay _______ Get your free @ address at Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 19, 2001 Report Share Posted October 19, 2001 Respected Krushnaji, I see that you are reading messages on the list but have not had time to reply to this one. Should I send you a reminder after a few days about these question? Kind regards Sanjay - " Sanjay Jaggia " <sanjaygg2001 Wednesday, October 17, 2001 8:07 PM lesson 25 on samdharmis Respected Krushnaji, I need some clarifications on this. I hope you will be able to find time to provide these soon. 1. When you define natural samdharmis, you mention Moon and Mars, and Sun and Mars as natural samdharmis apart from Saturn and Venus. I have no question about Saturn and Venus. However, we had some discussion about the others some months ago. You had mentioned that planet A owning the 4th house from planet B becomes samdharmi to planet B. This means that it can give the result for B (provided other conditions are met and the planets A and B do not own mutually opposing houses). However, B cannot give the result for A. In other words, B commands A so A has to do B's work but the reverse is not true. In the case of Saturn and Venus, each owns the 4th house from the other so they are mutual samdharmis. However, in the case of Mars with the luminaries, Mars commands Moon but is commanded by Sun. As such, these are not mutual samdharmis but a one sided relation. In this case, Moon can stand in for Mars but Mars will not stand in for Moon (unless they are samdharmi due to some other reason). Similarly, Mars will give the result for Sun but Sun would not give the result for Mars. Please advise if this is correct or not. 2. You mention that when planets are opposing, then the planet with 4 or more points will not act as samdharmi to the other planet. However, the planet with less than 4 points will act as samdharmi. Is this true for only natural samdharmis or also for the functional ones? Also, planets if they are samdharmi because of some other reason, does one stop acting like samdharmi to the other if it is malefically aspected by the other one because of some aspect other than the 7th? I hope my question is clear. 3. In the order of the strength of samdharmi relations (point 5 of the lesson), you have only defined this for functional samdharmis. What is the strength of natural samdharmiship? 4. In point 9, you have mentioned about Jupiter. Is this only for marriage or true for all affairs in general. That is, is Jupiter in Libra bad for all affairs or only for marriage? I think in your previous mails, it was only for marriage. I just want to reconfirm. 5. In point 10, you mention that the 6th lord (except for house 1 and 9), will not act as samdharmi to any planet. However, in previous clarifications, you have generally spared Sun and Moon from the defects of 6th lord. Is that exception for Sun and Moon valid here also? That is, do Sun and Moon act as samdharmi even if they are 6th lords? 6. In point 11, you say that any planet getting any points from 6th lord will not act as samdharmi. Is this for all houses? Also, do Sun and Moon have a special status here if 6th lords? What if the planet is samdharmi to the 6th lord itself? Will it not act for the 6th lord? What about a planet which is conjunct the 6th lord? Will it not act as a samdharmi to any other planet? 7. You mention the same restrictions for the lord of 12th from B as for the 6th lord. What about the Sun and Moon? Are they exceptions? 8. We know from earlier lessons that the most malefic planet in a house gets the points of the planet/s in 4th from it. However, for samdharmi relationship, is the planet in 4th samdharmi to every planet in the 10th with less than 4 points or only to the most malefic one? As you see, if I want to confuse myself, I can find many ways :-) Hopefully you would shed some light. Kind regards Sanjay _______ Get your free @ address at Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 20, 2001 Report Share Posted October 20, 2001 Dear Sanjay, I think I have tried to cover this in lesson 25. If it is not covered I will read it again and will explain it. Yes If any question is un answered, please remind me, Some time it may happen, I try to answer maximum possible in the available time, if any letter remains unanswered, I try to cover it up, even some time it may remain un answered. Please note it is never done deliberately. I will read your mail again, and will answer it. If possible if you can make your questions short, it will make me easy to answer. Please write the points only. krushna _______ > > Get your free @ address at Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 20, 2001 Report Share Posted October 20, 2001 Dear Sanjay, If you put one question in one mail, it will be easy for me to answer. It will take less time to answer, so in whole day as and when I will get free time, I can answer. Send one question in one mail. I think it will solve the problem. It it is big mail, I may kept it aside to answer later, and it is possible that " later " may not come. krushna , " Sanjay Jaggia " <sanjaygg2001> wrote: > Respected Krushnaji, > > I see that you are reading messages on the list but have not had time to > reply to this one. Should I send you a reminder after a few days about these > question? > > Kind regards > Sanjay > > > - > " Sanjay Jaggia " <sanjaygg2001> > > Wednesday, October 17, 2001 8:07 PM > lesson 25 on samdharmis > > > Respected Krushnaji, > > I need some clarifications on this. I hope you will be able to find time to > provide these soon. > > 1. When you define natural samdharmis, you mention Moon and Mars, and Sun > and Mars as natural samdharmis apart from Saturn and Venus. I have no > question about Saturn and Venus. However, we had some discussion about the > others some months ago. You had mentioned that planet A owning the 4th house > from planet B becomes samdharmi to planet B. This means that it can give the > result for B (provided other conditions are met and the planets A and B do > not own mutually opposing houses). However, B cannot give the result for A. > In other words, B commands A so A has to do B's work but the reverse is not > true. In the case of Saturn and Venus, each owns the 4th house from the > other so they are mutual samdharmis. However, in the case of Mars with the > luminaries, Mars commands Moon but is commanded by Sun. As such, these are > not mutual samdharmis but a one sided relation. In this case, Moon can stand > in for Mars but Mars will not stand in for Moon (unless they are samdharmi > due to some other reason). Similarly, Mars will give the result for Sun but > Sun would not give the result for Mars. Please advise if this is correct or > not. > > 2. You mention that when planets are opposing, then the planet with 4 or > more points will not act as samdharmi to the other planet. However, the > planet with less than 4 points will act as samdharmi. Is this true for only > natural samdharmis or also for the functional ones? Also, planets if they > are samdharmi because of some other reason, does one stop acting like > samdharmi to the other if it is malefically aspected by the other one > because of some aspect other than the 7th? I hope my question is clear. > > 3. In the order of the strength of samdharmi relations (point 5 of the > lesson), you have only defined this for functional samdharmis. What is the > strength of natural samdharmiship? > > 4. In point 9, you have mentioned about Jupiter. Is this only for marriage > or true for all affairs in general. That is, is Jupiter in Libra bad for all > affairs or only for marriage? I think in your previous mails, it was only > for marriage. I just want to reconfirm. > > 5. In point 10, you mention that the 6th lord (except for house 1 and 9), > will not act as samdharmi to any planet. However, in previous > clarifications, you have generally spared Sun and Moon from the defects of > 6th lord. Is that exception for Sun and Moon valid here also? That is, do > Sun and Moon act as samdharmi even if they are 6th lords? > > 6. In point 11, you say that any planet getting any points from 6th lord > will not act as samdharmi. Is this for all houses? Also, do Sun and Moon > have a special status here if 6th lords? What if the planet is samdharmi to > the 6th lord itself? Will it not act for the 6th lord? What about a planet > which is conjunct the 6th lord? Will it not act as a samdharmi to any other > planet? > > 7. You mention the same restrictions for the lord of 12th from B as for the > 6th lord. What about the Sun and Moon? Are they exceptions? > > 8. We know from earlier lessons that the most malefic planet in a house gets > the points of the planet/s in 4th from it. However, for samdharmi > relationship, is the planet in 4th samdharmi to every planet in the 10th > with less than 4 points or only to the most malefic one? > > As you see, if I want to confuse myself, I can find many ways :-) > Hopefully you would shed some light. > > Kind regards > Sanjay > > > > _______ > > Get your free @ address at > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 21, 2001 Report Share Posted October 21, 2001 Respected Krushnaji, I am sorry for putting these questions together. I put these together because they related to the same lesson. Please answer these if and when you have the time. In the meantime, I have noted your remarks about one question at a time. Kind regards Sanjay - <krushanain Sunday, October 21, 2001 1:43 AM Re: Fw: lesson 25 on samdharmis Dear Sanjay, If you put one question in one mail, it will be easy for me to answer. It will take less time to answer, so in whole day as and when I will get free time, I can answer. Send one question in one mail. I think it will solve the problem. It it is big mail, I may kept it aside to answer later, and it is possible that " later " may not come. krushna , " Sanjay Jaggia " <sanjaygg2001> wrote: > Respected Krushnaji, > > I see that you are reading messages on the list but have not had time to > reply to this one. Should I send you a reminder after a few days about these > question? > > Kind regards > Sanjay > > > - > " Sanjay Jaggia " <sanjaygg2001> > > Wednesday, October 17, 2001 8:07 PM > lesson 25 on samdharmis > > > Respected Krushnaji, > > I need some clarifications on this. I hope you will be able to find time to > provide these soon. > > 1. When you define natural samdharmis, you mention Moon and Mars, and Sun > and Mars as natural samdharmis apart from Saturn and Venus. I have no > question about Saturn and Venus. However, we had some discussion about the > others some months ago. You had mentioned that planet A owning the 4th house > from planet B becomes samdharmi to planet B. This means that it can give the > result for B (provided other conditions are met and the planets A and B do > not own mutually opposing houses). However, B cannot give the result for A. > In other words, B commands A so A has to do B's work but the reverse is not > true. In the case of Saturn and Venus, each owns the 4th house from the > other so they are mutual samdharmis. However, in the case of Mars with the > luminaries, Mars commands Moon but is commanded by Sun. As such, these are > not mutual samdharmis but a one sided relation. In this case, Moon can stand > in for Mars but Mars will not stand in for Moon (unless they are samdharmi > due to some other reason). Similarly, Mars will give the result for Sun but > Sun would not give the result for Mars. Please advise if this is correct or > not. > > 2. You mention that when planets are opposing, then the planet with 4 or > more points will not act as samdharmi to the other planet. However, the > planet with less than 4 points will act as samdharmi. Is this true for only > natural samdharmis or also for the functional ones? Also, planets if they > are samdharmi because of some other reason, does one stop acting like > samdharmi to the other if it is malefically aspected by the other one > because of some aspect other than the 7th? I hope my question is clear. > > 3. In the order of the strength of samdharmi relations (point 5 of the > lesson), you have only defined this for functional samdharmis. What is the > strength of natural samdharmiship? > > 4. In point 9, you have mentioned about Jupiter. Is this only for marriage > or true for all affairs in general. That is, is Jupiter in Libra bad for all > affairs or only for marriage? I think in your previous mails, it was only > for marriage. I just want to reconfirm. > > 5. In point 10, you mention that the 6th lord (except for house 1 and 9), > will not act as samdharmi to any planet. However, in previous > clarifications, you have generally spared Sun and Moon from the defects of > 6th lord. Is that exception for Sun and Moon valid here also? That is, do > Sun and Moon act as samdharmi even if they are 6th lords? > > 6. In point 11, you say that any planet getting any points from 6th lord > will not act as samdharmi. Is this for all houses? Also, do Sun and Moon > have a special status here if 6th lords? What if the planet is samdharmi to > the 6th lord itself? Will it not act for the 6th lord? What about a planet > which is conjunct the 6th lord? Will it not act as a samdharmi to any other > planet? > > 7. You mention the same restrictions for the lord of 12th from B as for the > 6th lord. What about the Sun and Moon? Are they exceptions? > > 8. We know from earlier lessons that the most malefic planet in a house gets > the points of the planet/s in 4th from it. However, for samdharmi > relationship, is the planet in 4th samdharmi to every planet in the 10th > with less than 4 points or only to the most malefic one? > > As you see, if I want to confuse myself, I can find many ways :-) > Hopefully you would shed some light. > > Kind regards > Sanjay > > > > _______ > > Get your free @ address at > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 29, 2001 Report Share Posted October 29, 2001 Dear Sanjay, Answer for 1) When two planets are in 4:10 relation ship, the result we are considering is is purely based on Points of the planet in the 10th house. if the planet in 10th house is having more points, they can not be samdharmi. In the case of Moon and Mars, they are natural samdharmi. Of course it is due to their natural relation 4:10. It is not due to their points. Similar is for Sun and Mars. Reason behind this may be due to the debilitated sign of Mars, and Moon, and also the other relation of 9:5, where the constellation are ruled by same planets. 2)The 7th sight is treated as sight of enmity. Other sight are considered for results. This is applicable to only natural samdharmi. When any planets are in 1:7th relation they can not be samdharmi. 3) There is no difference in the strength of natural samdharmi. 4) Jupiter in Libra, is bad for marriage, even it do not give much better results for 4th, 2nd, 12th and 8th house. In other things these houses are playing important role. In that case, the result is not achieved in full strength. For marriage, the result is not good. In my opinion marriage is a very important event of the life, it it is disturbed, Person may not be able to show, his full efficiency. If we consider result for 3rd house 7th house is C, and 10th is A. So for every successful person 7th house is having important role. 5) Sun and Moon, should not be considered as 6th lord. They may give bad result but not due to being 6th lord. 6) If any planet became powerful due to the sight of 6th lord, or being situated in the 10th house from 6th lord, with less points, then for good results such planet will should not be considered. Sun and Moon should not be treated as 6th lord. They do not adhere any quality of sixth lord. 7) Sun and Moon are not considered as sixth lord, as 12th lord, they will behave, as other planets do. For Ex. If Sun is sith lord and is situated in 7th house, here it will act as 12th from 7th house, so native will experience some deficite in the marital relations. Even suppose Sun or Moon are 9th lord and are situated in 10th house, it will reduce the success of the person. 8) If more then one planets are situated in one sign, they all became samdharmi. The planet which is situated in the 4th place, becames samdharmi to the planet having minimum points. Lastly I got time to answer your questions. As the time lapse, I took some time to search your this mail. When more questions are included in one mail, I get fear, that I will not be able to answer all the questions in available time. So it is avoided. If only one or two questions are in one mail, I can answer it easily, even if it took 5/10 min. more, may not effect. You would have marked, that other small mails, I have answered immidiately. Please send one question in one mail, you can send more mails, that will not be the problem. I may get time at different intervals, so I will complete one by one. Please try to understand me, in one sitting, answering many questions, require more time in one lenth. Which is difficult for me. krushna , " Sanjay Jaggia " <sanjaygg2001> wrote: > Respected Krushnaji, > > I need some clarifications on this. I hope you will be able to find time to > provide these soon. > > 1. When you define natural samdharmis, you mention Moon and Mars, and Sun > and Mars as natural samdharmis apart from Saturn and Venus. I have no > question about Saturn and Venus. However, we had some discussion about the > others some months ago. You had mentioned that planet A owning the 4th house > from planet B becomes samdharmi to planet B. This means that it can give the > result for B (provided other conditions are met and the planets A and B do > not own mutually opposing houses). However, B cannot give the result for A. > In other words, B commands A so A has to do B's work but the reverse is not > true. In the case of Saturn and Venus, each owns the 4th house from the > other so they are mutual samdharmis. However, in the case of Mars with the > luminaries, Mars commands Moon but is commanded by Sun. As such, these are > not mutual samdharmis but a one sided relation. In this case, Moon can stand > in for Mars but Mars will not stand in for Moon (unless they are samdharmi > due to some other reason). Similarly, Mars will give the result for Sun but > Sun would not give the result for Mars. Please advise if this is correct or > not. > > 2. You mention that when planets are opposing, then the planet with 4 or > more points will not act as samdharmi to the other planet. However, the > planet with less than 4 points will act as samdharmi. Is this true for only > natural samdharmis or also for the functional ones? Also, planets if they > are samdharmi because of some other reason, does one stop acting like > samdharmi to the other if it is malefically aspected by the other one > because of some aspect other than the 7th? I hope my question is clear. > > 3. In the order of the strength of samdharmi relations (point 5 of the > lesson), you have only defined this for functional samdharmis. What is the > strength of natural samdharmiship? > > 4. In point 9, you have mentioned about Jupiter. Is this only for marriage > or true for all affairs in general. That is, is Jupiter in Libra bad for all > affairs or only for marriage? I think in your previous mails, it was only > for marriage. I just want to reconfirm. > > 5. In point 10, you mention that the 6th lord (except for house 1 and 9), > will not act as samdharmi to any planet. However, in previous > clarifications, you have generally spared Sun and Moon from the defects of > 6th lord. Is that exception for Sun and Moon valid here also? That is, do > Sun and Moon act as samdharmi even if they are 6th lords? > > 6. In point 11, you say that any planet getting any points from 6th lord > will not act as samdharmi. Is this for all houses? Also, do Sun and Moon > have a special status here if 6th lords? What if the planet is samdharmi to > the 6th lord itself? Will it not act for the 6th lord? What about a planet > which is conjunct the 6th lord? Will it not act as a samdharmi to any other > planet? > > 7. You mention the same restrictions for the lord of 12th from B as for the > 6th lord. What about the Sun and Moon? Are they exceptions? > > 8. We know from earlier lessons that the most malefic planet in a house gets > the points of the planet/s in 4th from it. However, for samdharmi > relationship, is the planet in 4th samdharmi to every planet in the 10th > with less than 4 points or only to the most malefic one? > > As you see, if I want to confuse myself, I can find many ways :-) > Hopefully you would shed some light. > > Kind regards > Sanjay > > > > _______ > > Get your free @ address at Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 30, 2001 Report Share Posted October 30, 2001 Respected Krushnaji, Thank you for taking the time to answer these questions. You are probably not aware how much these answers have added to my understanding of the system. Some answers are very clear. In some answers, I need to ask some clarifications. However, I will read these answers several times and try to make question in less that 7-8 lines. Kind regards Sanjay - <krushanain Tuesday, October 30, 2001 2:47 AM Re: lesson 25 on samdharmis Dear Sanjay, Answer for 1) When two planets are in 4:10 relation ship, the result we are considering is is purely based on Points of the planet in the 10th house. if the planet in 10th house is having more points, they can not be samdharmi. In the case of Moon and Mars, they are natural samdharmi. Of course it is due to their natural relation 4:10. It is not due to their points. Similar is for Sun and Mars. Reason behind this may be due to the debilitated sign of Mars, and Moon, and also the other relation of 9:5, where the constellation are ruled by same planets. 2)The 7th sight is treated as sight of enmity. Other sight are considered for results. This is applicable to only natural samdharmi. When any planets are in 1:7th relation they can not be samdharmi. 3) There is no difference in the strength of natural samdharmi. 4) Jupiter in Libra, is bad for marriage, even it do not give much better results for 4th, 2nd, 12th and 8th house. In other things these houses are playing important role. In that case, the result is not achieved in full strength. For marriage, the result is not good. In my opinion marriage is a very important event of the life, it it is disturbed, Person may not be able to show, his full efficiency. If we consider result for 3rd house 7th house is C, and 10th is A. So for every successful person 7th house is having important role. 5) Sun and Moon, should not be considered as 6th lord. They may give bad result but not due to being 6th lord. 6) If any planet became powerful due to the sight of 6th lord, or being situated in the 10th house from 6th lord, with less points, then for good results such planet will should not be considered. Sun and Moon should not be treated as 6th lord. They do not adhere any quality of sixth lord. 7) Sun and Moon are not considered as sixth lord, as 12th lord, they will behave, as other planets do. For Ex. If Sun is sith lord and is situated in 7th house, here it will act as 12th from 7th house, so native will experience some deficite in the marital relations. Even suppose Sun or Moon are 9th lord and are situated in 10th house, it will reduce the success of the person. 8) If more then one planets are situated in one sign, they all became samdharmi. The planet which is situated in the 4th place, becames samdharmi to the planet having minimum points. Lastly I got time to answer your questions. As the time lapse, I took some time to search your this mail. When more questions are included in one mail, I get fear, that I will not be able to answer all the questions in available time. So it is avoided. If only one or two questions are in one mail, I can answer it easily, even if it took 5/10 min. more, may not effect. You would have marked, that other small mails, I have answered immidiately. Please send one question in one mail, you can send more mails, that will not be the problem. I may get time at different intervals, so I will complete one by one. Please try to understand me, in one sitting, answering many questions, require more time in one lenth. Which is difficult for me. krushna , " Sanjay Jaggia " <sanjaygg2001> wrote: > Respected Krushnaji, > > I need some clarifications on this. I hope you will be able to find time to > provide these soon. > > 1. When you define natural samdharmis, you mention Moon and Mars, and Sun > and Mars as natural samdharmis apart from Saturn and Venus. I have no > question about Saturn and Venus. However, we had some discussion about the > others some months ago. You had mentioned that planet A owning the 4th house > from planet B becomes samdharmi to planet B. This means that it can give the > result for B (provided other conditions are met and the planets A and B do > not own mutually opposing houses). However, B cannot give the result for A. > In other words, B commands A so A has to do B's work but the reverse is not > true. In the case of Saturn and Venus, each owns the 4th house from the > other so they are mutual samdharmis. However, in the case of Mars with the > luminaries, Mars commands Moon but is commanded by Sun. As such, these are > not mutual samdharmis but a one sided relation. In this case, Moon can stand > in for Mars but Mars will not stand in for Moon (unless they are samdharmi > due to some other reason). Similarly, Mars will give the result for Sun but > Sun would not give the result for Mars. Please advise if this is correct or > not. > > 2. You mention that when planets are opposing, then the planet with 4 or > more points will not act as samdharmi to the other planet. However, the > planet with less than 4 points will act as samdharmi. Is this true for only > natural samdharmis or also for the functional ones? Also, planets if they > are samdharmi because of some other reason, does one stop acting like > samdharmi to the other if it is malefically aspected by the other one > because of some aspect other than the 7th? I hope my question is clear. > > 3. In the order of the strength of samdharmi relations (point 5 of the > lesson), you have only defined this for functional samdharmis. What is the > strength of natural samdharmiship? > > 4. In point 9, you have mentioned about Jupiter. Is this only for marriage > or true for all affairs in general. That is, is Jupiter in Libra bad for all > affairs or only for marriage? I think in your previous mails, it was only > for marriage. I just want to reconfirm. > > 5. In point 10, you mention that the 6th lord (except for house 1 and 9), > will not act as samdharmi to any planet. However, in previous > clarifications, you have generally spared Sun and Moon from the defects of > 6th lord. Is that exception for Sun and Moon valid here also? That is, do > Sun and Moon act as samdharmi even if they are 6th lords? > > 6. In point 11, you say that any planet getting any points from 6th lord > will not act as samdharmi. Is this for all houses? Also, do Sun and Moon > have a special status here if 6th lords? What if the planet is samdharmi to > the 6th lord itself? Will it not act for the 6th lord? What about a planet > which is conjunct the 6th lord? Will it not act as a samdharmi to any other > planet? > > 7. You mention the same restrictions for the lord of 12th from B as for the > 6th lord. What about the Sun and Moon? Are they exceptions? > > 8. We know from earlier lessons that the most malefic planet in a house gets > the points of the planet/s in 4th from it. However, for samdharmi > relationship, is the planet in 4th samdharmi to every planet in the 10th > with less than 4 points or only to the most malefic one? > > As you see, if I want to confuse myself, I can find many ways :-) > Hopefully you would shed some light. > > Kind regards > Sanjay > > > > _______ > > Get your free @ address at _______ Get your free @ address at Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.