A Question for Krushnaji

[Guest guest]

Pranam Krushnaji and list members,

 

Hope that All's well.

 

I have been going through the first few lessons and I have a question

that has been nagging me for a while now.

 

It is on the lesson of Aspects of Malefic and Benefic's as per

Ashtavarga Analysis.

 

My thoughts :

 

Assume a planet is Benefic eg. Jupiter (with 5 points) placed in a

house. It casts it graha dristi with malefic of -5 *EACH* to 5th,

7th and 9th houses from where it is placed. It is only benefic of +5

to the house it is situated in and malefic to the house it is

situated in with 8-5 = 3 rekhas.

 

This is where I get confused.

 

We say that Jupiter because it has 5 points is a benefic - I agree

Jupiter is malefic to the house it is situated with 3 rekhas - I agree

 

Now, Since Jupiter is benefic with 5 points its casting malefic

dristi of -5 *EACH* to 3 houses and it is malefic with -3 to the

house it is placed in assuming Jupiter is getting 5 points.

 

So basically 3 houses suffer + the house it is situated in get some

malificance of 8-5 = 3 points hence not making it 100% benefic even

for the house it is placed in.

 

So shouldnt that make Jupiter more malefic than benefic in the

overall sense.

 

If jupiter were to cast a dristi of -5 points to 3 houses it cast its

graha dristi on then that becomes -15 points divided into 3 houses,

plus -3 points for the house it is in.

There by making it -18. So basically Jupiter if it were to receive 5

points would cast a dristi of -18 and a + of 5 points.

 

Based on the above factor, shouldnt one then expect that a planet

with lesser points is more beneficial as it would affect 3 houses

with positive dristi, be malefic to the house it is placed in,

thereby making it 75% beneficial and 25% malefic.

 

Could you please clarify my thought process and where am I going

wrong in understanding this concept, I would really appreciate it.

 

Even the more experienced members of this list can help me out here

as I am very keen to understand the fundamentals of this system.

 

 

One last quick question.

In the above example, Jupiter with 5 points, does it cast malefic

aspect of -5 and share it on the 3 houses it has graha dristi on.

i.e -1.66 to each house or is it -5 to each house it has its sight

on ?

 

Thanking you all for your patience,

Cheers !!!

Ash

[Guest guest]

Dear Ash

My comments in Capital:

 

> My thoughts :

>

> Assume a planet is Benefic eg. Jupiter (with 5 points) placed in a

> house. It casts it graha dristi with malefic of -5 *EACH* to 5th,

> 7th and 9th houses from where it is placed. It is only benefic of

+5

> to the house it is situated in and malefic to the house it is

> situated in with 8-5 = 3 rekhas. YOU ARE CORRECT UP TILL NOW.

WE CONSIDER ONLY BENEFIC POINTS. WE DO NOT CONSIDER MALEFIC POINTS.

> > This is where I get confused.

>

> We say that Jupiter because it has 5 points is a benefic - I agree

> Jupiter is malefic to the house it is situated with 3 rekhas - I

agree. WE SHOULD CONSIDER ONLY BENEFIC. ANY PLANET GETTING 5 POINTS

MEANS IT HAVE GOR FAVOR FROM 5 PLANETS, AND THREE PLANETS ARE NOT

FAVORING IT. aS MORE PLANETS ARE IN FAVOR, THEN IT HAVE GOT GOOD

STRENGTH, TO ACT. sO IT WILL GIVE BENEFIC RESULT FOR THE HOUSE IT IS

SITUATED.

>

> Now, Since Jupiter is benefic with 5 points its casting malefic

> dristi of -5 *EACH* to 3 houses and it is malefic with -3 to the

> house it is placed in assuming Jupiter is getting 5 points. iF YOU

CONSIDER THE BENEFIC AND MALEFIC BOTH AT A TIME, THEN BENEFIC 5 LESS

MALEFIC 3 , STILL THE PLANET WILL BE BENEFIC FOR THE PLACE IT IS

SITUATED.

>

> So basically 3 houses suffer + the house it is situated in get some

> malificance of 8-5 = 3 points hence not making it 100% benefic even

> for the house it is placed in. eXPLAINED ABOVE.

>

> So shouldnt that make Jupiter more malefic than benefic in the

> overall sense. NO ONLY IT WILL GIVE MALEFIC EFFECT FOR THE HOUSE

HAVING IT'S SIGHT, AND BENEFIC EFFECT FOR THE HOUSE IT IS SITUATED.

>

> If jupiter were to cast a dristi of -5 points to 3 houses it cast

its

> graha dristi on then that becomes -15 points divided into 3 houses,

> plus -3 points for the house it is in.

> There by making it -18. So basically Jupiter if it were to receive

5

> points would cast a dristi of -18 and a + of 5 points. iF YOU

CONSIDER ONLY ONE SIDE IT WILL NOT CONFUSE YOU. ( IF A GLASS IS

FILLED HALF, IT MEANS IT IS EMPTY HALF. IT IS ASSUMED. IF YOU WILL

SAY IT HALF EMPTY, AND HALF FULL SO THE TOTAL IS NIL. +1/2 -1/2 =

ZERO. )

>

> Based on the above factor, shouldnt one then expect that a planet

> with lesser points is more beneficial as it would affect 3 houses

> with positive dristi, be malefic to the house it is placed in,

> thereby making it 75% beneficial and 25% malefic.

>

> Could you please clarify my thought process and where am I going

> wrong in understanding this concept, I would really appreciate it.

>

> Even the more experienced members of this list can help me out here

> as I am very keen to understand the fundamentals of this system.

>

>

> One last quick question.

> In the above example, Jupiter with 5 points, does it cast malefic

> aspect of -5 and share it on the 3 houses it has graha dristi on.

> i.e -1.66 to each house or is it -5 to each house it has its sight

> on ?

sO AS PER YOUR CALCULATIONS THE HALF FILLED SHOULD BE TREATED AS

EMPTY. .....KRUSHNA

> Thanking you all for your patience,

> Cheers !!!

> Ash