Children in Chart

[Guest guest]

Dear Krushna, Margarita and list members,

If my memory serves me well, in the archives when Krushna did an

analysis of Peters chart he indirectly asked peter about children.

He said that children was possible in Mars or Sun's antar dasa. But

the total period of Mars and Sun was less than 9 months.

 

So my question is that in order to find if a couple could have

children, shouldnt we consider both the charts of husband and wife to

see the indication of children. There could be a case in which the

indications are there for a Male to have children but the wife for

some reason cannot concieve or vice versa. There also could be a

case of multiple marriages wherein a person can have children from

someone other than wife. How do we analyse this.

 

Thanks,

Cheers !!!

Ash

 

ps : The reason I ask this is because this is linked to the different

cultures and relegious beliefs and difference that lie in the East as

compared to West.

 

-- In , " dmlettens " <dmlettens@s...>

wrote:

> Thank you Krushna, I understand what you say, but nothing in the

chart

> indicated that she could not have children. Of course I only

focused on the

> rules concerning Mars and Rahu, but perhaps there are other laws

involved ?

> Thanks again

> Margarita

>

> krushanain@h... [krushanain@h...]

> Wednesday, November 07, 2001 7:53 PM

>

> Re: death of parents in your

wife's

> shart (Rectification required)

>

>

> Dear Margarita, and other list members,

> Before calculating the results of any chart, and

perticularly

> charts of old aged persons, ( also for current period) the birth

time

> should be rectified. Once should check when the Ascendent is on

the

> cusp chart for both sign should be checked.

> This chart should be corrected for B.O.T. If you take birth

> time 12:09 pm you will find much easier to find the events.

> The marriage, when no child is there, generally happens in

> the sub of the planet having less points.

> Any how your effort is very nice, and you remember all the

> laws. I have not read all your messages, I will read them and will

> give comment on them. Please alway note that when any

perticular

> law is not applying there must be some problem with the B.O.T.

>

> Thanks

> krushna

>

>

>

> , " dmlettens " <dmlettens@s...>

> wrote:

> >

> > OK Peter, Your reasoning is much easier to follow. Perhaps I

have

> the art to

> > complicate things. Yes, the 3th lord from any house becomes the

> significator

> > for the " death " of that house (which is house A for the 8th).

Now

> if her

> > father died in 1963. I agree that Venus cannot give results

because

> she

> > lacks the points. So my eye just felt on the 8th house, which is

> the 12th

> > fomr the 9th. There Jupiter and Venus stand out as main

culprits ;

> Jupiter

> > Lord of A and C and Venus lord of D with 19 points. We probably

> have to look

> > at more houses, but I don't know if my brain can cope ????

> > As for the mother. If you take the 5th house, the Jupiter is

lord

> of A, as

> > mainlord he is OK. But Krushna told us that the mainlord is not

> always

> > related to house A, but Venus and Moon have enough points but

Venus

> aspects

> > house A for the 10th as B so I suppose it was Jupiter/Moon????

> > Best regards

> > Margarita

> >

> > Peter [petermay@p...]

> > Wednesday, November 07, 2001 11:10 AM

> > Margarita Lettens

> > Re: death of parents in your

> wife's

> > shart

> >

> >

> > Dear Margarita,

> > I will try and follow your example by following the points in

short

> letters

> > one by one. By the way my letters are not coming through today

on

> the list

> > letters (it changes day by day) so could you post my replies to

the

> list so

> > that they all get the answers.

> > Now looking at the death of her father first. You say that you

will

> first

> > look at those planets with low points in the 9th and they are

the

> Sun and

> > Venus. This is true but you then do not mention these planets

again

> so what

> > was the point of looking at them in the first place.

> > Next I was able to follow the rest of your arumen but

unfortunately

> it did

> > not lead to the correct answer.

> > Now using the technique which I read from the letter by Krushna

I

> came up

> > with the following. With 9th representing the father the lord

of,

> or planets

> > in the 11th (3rd from the 9th) will give the sub-period for

death

> which

> > gives either Mars (ruler, Sun, or Venus) of those Venus has the

> lowest

> > points in the 11th and is the Lord of the 12th for 11th so

cannot

> do good. I

> > would opt for Venus sub-period. Of course I know that it is in

> fact during

> > the Venus sub-period so perhaps I'm cheating a bit here. I could

> not find

> > any reason for the main period which is Jupiter ( Death 15 March

> 1963) -

> > perhaps you can.

> > Using the same technique for the mother the 5th is the 3rd from

the

> 3rd and

> > is Taurus ruled by Venus and containing the Moon so it could be

> either Moon

> > or Venus. As Venus is Lord of E it wants to give a result so

again

> I opt for

> > Venus, again I cannot find a reason for the main period which is

> again

> > Jupiter. Jupiter is however Lord of the 12th in the Rasi so

perhaps

> that has

> > something to do with it.

> >

> > Peter Namaste

>

>

>