Guest guest Posted December 31, 2001 Report Share Posted December 31, 2001 Respected Krushna, Thank you for this chart. I agree that the reasons given (Rahu aspecting the Moon, lord of the 12th for death of husband) are not valid because Rahu has aspected her Moon during her whole married and non married life. Now I can understand the Rahu/Saturn period for the event, Saturn acting for Mars. But why did death of the husband then happen in the first part of this period ? Rahu and Saturn are slow; Mars is faster but still not that fast; he could have made things happen in the second part but I don't understand why they happened in the first part of the bukthi. Another thought : Could Mercury be a valid candidate for death of husband ? He is lord of B, in A and also lord of D and having strong points. You see for me things are not that simple. I thank you for your kind words; they encourage my " AV struggles " . I must say that with this system I have acquired another look on astrology and I thank you for that. I'm deeply convinced it gives the best results (for me anyway). Best regards Margarita Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 1, 2002 Report Share Posted January 1, 2002 Dear Margarita, and list members, Death of the husband, generally in the main period of 9th lord or it's samdharm or the planets situated in 9th house with more points. The Sub period may be of the strongest significator for 2nd house, or lord of D or E ( 11th lord or 7th lord). Here in this case the lord of 9th is Mars, and it aspects house B, so main period may be of some other planet samdharmi to Mars or situated in 9th with more points. Here Rahu is samdharmi to Mars, and as it is situated in 9th house it's main period can give the result. Regarding Sub period Saturn is the strongest significator. ( Death occures in the sub of Strongest Significator) Here Saturn is strongest and Mercury is on 2nd step. Saturn sub in Rahu Main is the first period came after her marriage. Saturn being in 5th she must have married late. After marriage she might have Sun and Mars Main period. Sun is having less points in 9th ( 2) and as mars is aspecting house B, and there is no chance for it to give it's result in it's main period. Now it is Rahu, which is situated in 9th, so it is Karak for 2nd house. Saturn is strongest planet. so in Rahu sub, it can give the result such as death of husband. As per my calculations Saturn sub started from 15th Dec 1979. the event happened in the 2nd part of the sub period. ( Saturn have not given the result due to Mars, but it is on it's own ) Mercury is also able to give the result, but Saturn sub is first then Mercury, and as it is lord of E, it's sight on B do not effect it. If Saturn would have less points then Mercury, it was possible that the result would have been in Mercury sub. It will make the things more clear. krushna , " dmlettens " <dmlettens@s...> wrote: > Respected Krushna, > Thank you for this chart. I agree that the reasons given > (Rahu aspecting the Moon, lord of the 12th for death of > husband) are not valid because Rahu has aspected her Moon > during her whole married and non married life. > Now I can understand the Rahu/Saturn period for the event, > Saturn acting for Mars. But why did death of the husband > then happen in the first part of this period ? Rahu and > Saturn are slow; Mars is faster but still not that fast; he > could have made things happen in the second part but I > don't understand why they happened in the first part of the > bukthi. > Another thought : Could Mercury be a valid candidate for > death of husband ? He is lord of B, in A and also lord of D > and having strong points. You see for me things are not > that simple. I thank you for your kind words; they > encourage my " AV struggles " . I must say that with this > system I have acquired another look on astrology and I > thank you for that. I'm deeply convinced it gives the best > results (for me anyway). > Best regards > Margarita Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 1, 2002 Report Share Posted January 1, 2002 Thank you Krushna for the comments. Yes, 9th house is 3th for the husband or his house A As to the right period. Well, according to my sources, there was a summer time between 12april and 4 october 1930, so my program calculated that automaticly and I got 10°32 Leo ascendent. Whatever it may be, and we never know if this time really was valid at that time the asc stays Leo but Rahu/Saturn the starts on 21/03/80. So probably your ascendent is more correct then mine and I will correct the chart. Best regards Margarita -----Original Message----- krushanain [krushanain] Tuesday, January 01, 2002 4:55 PM To: Subject: Re: chart 31.12.01 death of husband Dear Margarita, and list members, Death of the husband, generally in the main period of 9th lord or it's samdharm or the planets situated in 9th house with more points. The Sub period may be of the strongest significator for 2nd house, or lord of D or E ( 11th lord or 7th lord). Here in this case the lord of 9th is Mars, and it aspects house B, so main period may be of some other planet samdharmi to Mars or situated in 9th with more points. Here Rahu is samdharmi to Mars, and as it is situated in 9th house it's main period can give the result. Regarding Sub period Saturn is the strongest significator. ( Death occures in the sub of Strongest Significator) Here Saturn is strongest and Mercury is on 2nd step. Saturn sub in Rahu Main is the first period came after her marriage. Saturn being in 5th she must have married late. After marriage she might have Sun and Mars Main period. Sun is having less points in 9th ( 2) and as mars is aspecting house B, and there is no chance for it to give it's result in it's main period. Now it is Rahu, which is situated in 9th, so it is Karak for 2nd house. Saturn is strongest planet. so in Rahu sub, it can give the result such as death of husband. As per my calculations Saturn sub started from 15th Dec 1979. the event happened in the 2nd part of the sub period. ( Saturn have not given the result due to Mars, but it is on it's own ) Mercury is also able to give the result, but Saturn sub is first then Mercury, and as it is lord of E, it's sight on B do not effect it. If Saturn would have less points then Mercury, it was possible that the result would have been in Mercury sub. It will make the things more clear. krushna , " dmlettens " <dmlettens@s...> wrote: > Respected Krushna, > Thank you for this chart. I agree that the reasons given > (Rahu aspecting the Moon, lord of the 12th for death of > husband) are not valid because Rahu has aspected her Moon > during her whole married and non married life. > Now I can understand the Rahu/Saturn period for the event, > Saturn acting for Mars. But why did death of the husband > then happen in the first part of this period ? Rahu and > Saturn are slow; Mars is faster but still not that fast; he > could have made things happen in the second part but I > don't understand why they happened in the first part of the > bukthi. > Another thought : Could Mercury be a valid candidate for > death of husband ? He is lord of B, in A and also lord of D > and having strong points. You see for me things are not > that simple. I thank you for your kind words; they > encourage my " AV struggles " . I must say that with this > system I have acquired another look on astrology and I > thank you for that. I'm deeply convinced it gives the best > results (for me anyway). > Best regards > Margarita Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 1, 2002 Report Share Posted January 1, 2002 Dear Margarita, In the chart I have mentioned that no DST, means the time given is considering DST. So no DST is to be considered. You are correct for DST, as per my record, in 1930 DST was from 13th April from 2 am to 5th Oct 2 am. As the time for the chart was given deducting DST so not to deduct again. For your program you should have added it for this perticular chart. krushna , " dmlettens " <dmlettens@s...> wrote: > Thank you Krushna for the comments. > Yes, 9th house is 3th for the husband or his house A > As to the right period. Well, according to my sources, there was a summer > time between 12april and 4 october 1930, so my program calculated that > automaticly and I got 10?32 Leo ascendent. Whatever it may be, and we never > know if this time really was valid at that time the asc stays Leo but > Rahu/Saturn the starts on 21/03/80. So probably your ascendent is more > correct then mine and I will correct the chart. > Best regards > Margarita > > > krushanain [krushanain] > Tuesday, January 01, 2002 4:55 PM > > Re: chart 31.12.01 death of husband > > Dear Margarita, and list members, > Death of the husband, generally in the main period of 9th > lord or it's samdharm or the planets situated in 9th house with more > points. The Sub period may be of the strongest significator for 2nd > house, or lord of D or E ( 11th lord or 7th lord). Here in this case > the lord of 9th is Mars, and it aspects house B, so main period may > be of some other planet samdharmi to Mars or situated in 9th with > more points. Here Rahu is samdharmi to Mars, and as it is situated in > 9th house it's main period can give the result. Regarding Sub period > Saturn is the strongest significator. ( Death occures in the sub of > Strongest Significator) Here Saturn is strongest and Mercury is on > 2nd step. Saturn sub in Rahu Main is the first period came after her > marriage. Saturn being in 5th she must have married late. After > marriage she might have Sun and Mars Main period. Sun is having less > points in 9th ( 2) and as mars is aspecting house B, and there is no > chance for it to give it's result in it's main period. > Now it is Rahu, which is situated in 9th, so it is Karak > for 2nd house. Saturn is strongest planet. so in Rahu sub, it can > give the result such as death of husband. As per my calculations > Saturn sub started from 15th Dec 1979. the event happened in the 2nd > part of the sub period. ( Saturn have not given the result due to > Mars, but it is on it's own ) > Mercury is also able to give the result, but Saturn sub is > first then Mercury, and as it is lord of E, it's sight on B do not > effect it. If Saturn would have less points then Mercury, it was > possible that the result would have been in Mercury sub. > It will make the things more clear. > krushna > > > , " dmlettens " <dmlettens@s...> > wrote: > > Respected Krushna, > > Thank you for this chart. I agree that the reasons given > > (Rahu aspecting the Moon, lord of the 12th for death of > > husband) are not valid because Rahu has aspected her Moon > > during her whole married and non married life. > > Now I can understand the Rahu/Saturn period for the event, > > Saturn acting for Mars. But why did death of the husband > > then happen in the first part of this period ? Rahu and > > Saturn are slow; Mars is faster but still not that fast; he > > could have made things happen in the second part but I > > don't understand why they happened in the first part of the > > bukthi. > > Another thought : Could Mercury be a valid candidate for > > death of husband ? He is lord of B, in A and also lord of D > > and having strong points. You see for me things are not > > that simple. I thank you for your kind words; they > > encourage my " AV struggles " . I must say that with this > > system I have acquired another look on astrology and I > > thank you for that. I'm deeply convinced it gives the best > > results (for me anyway). > > Best regards > > Margarita > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.