Guest guest Posted January 16, 2003 Report Share Posted January 16, 2003 Hello Ash, About the husband's chart perhaps we could consider his marriage a 5/12th house affair. Jupiter who is samdharmi to Venus has good points for the 5th and 12th houses but Venus' period comes first, so I think she acted for Jupiter who comes only as last in this period. Venus also becomes a strong significator for the 5th and 12th houses. I think this relationship is kept together through ties (friendship) because of the aspects between mutual Saturn/Mars/Venus. The husband probably also has a lot of charm because according to the 8 points of Venus in Gemini, he should have more " sex appeal " . All planets(except Saturn, and Mars as lord of the 6th in the 6th)) in this chart cast negative aspects so this gives rather low points in the worksheet. Moon especially suffers from Mercury and Jupiter. Best regards Margarita --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.441 / Virus Database: 247 - Release Date: 1/9/2003 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 16, 2003 Report Share Posted January 16, 2003 Dear Krushnaji, Margarita and Philippe, Just 1 points, Venus is LOE for 7th house (Sco ascendent), so it does not matter how many points it has in the worksheet, it would still be eager to give result. Now with Venus also contributing more points to 5th and 12th its even better. My concern were 2 things. First one was Guru is in libra and vargottam so its spoilt and second one was that Venus is in the Navamsa of 6th lord in Rasi so this could indicate break in the relationship. Actually I would like to discuss as to Why Venus gave marriage to begin with ? 1) Venus is LOE and eager to give result, BUT it is in the Navamsa of 6th lord or rasi, so it should not have given result. 2) Did Venus give result because, FK is spoilt (Guru in libra) ? 3) Could it have been because Malefic Guru is aspecting NK Venus both in Rasi and Navamsa ? The reason for me questioning Venus or trying to understand why Venus gave marriage is because if you remember when we discussed Peter's chart regarding child birth, Krushnaji pointed out the fact that if in the divisional chart the planet that is eager to give result in rasi (in Peters case it was LOD or LOE), but placed in the sign of 6th lord (Sign Cancer in Peters case in Saptamsa) then despite it being LOD or LOE and aspecting house A,B or C it would not give result. So for marriage, we can take Navamsa as the divisional chart being Dharmamsa and if Venus in our case is aspecting House A in Rasi and being placed in the sign of 6th lord then why did it give result ? (based on the same principles) I think this is a finer point and worth discussing. Maybe you or Krushnaji and even Philippe can provide an explanation ? Maybe the answer is straight forward but I cant see it. Thanking you, Cheers !!! Ash , " dmlettens " <dmlettens@s...> wrote: > Hello Ash, > About the husband's chart perhaps we could consider his > marriage a 5/12th house affair. Jupiter who is samdharmi > to Venus has good points for the 5th and 12th houses but > Venus' period comes first, so I think she acted for Jupiter > who comes only as last in this period. Venus also becomes a > strong significator for the 5th and 12th houses. > I think this relationship is kept together through ties > (friendship) because of the aspects between mutual > Saturn/Mars/Venus. The husband probably also has a lot of > charm because according to the 8 points of Venus in Gemini, > he should have more " sex appeal " . All planets(except > Saturn, and Mars as lord of the 6th in the 6th)) in this > chart cast negative aspects so this gives rather low points > in the worksheet. Moon especially suffers from Mercury and > Jupiter. > Best regards > Margarita > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 16, 2003 Report Share Posted January 16, 2003 Hello Margarita, thank you for your encouragements. You're right, one could hesitate a lot, in the husband's chart , between Libra and Scorpio ascendant. Knowing the man (who is a friend of mine) I had finally taken the Scorpio ascendant because it seems to fit his temper better. As for his first child, Mars is samdharmi to the Sun (it is in Sun's navamsa for the rectified TOB) and the Sun is lord of D for house V=B. Mars is aspecting house A and C but I thought that for samdharmis it didn't prevent them from giving the event. Concerning his wife's accident when she was young, you wrote that the main lord is often connected to lord of A. From your analysis, it seems that it doesn't have to be samdharmi to lord of A, it can just occupy its sign (or perhaps also its nakshatra ?) Am I right? As for the father's death in the wife's chart, I don't understand how the Moon could act for Saturn. I thought, Saturn being in Moon's navamsa, that Saturn could act for the Moon but not the contrary. Could you please correct me ? Thank you for your analysis on these charts. Best regards Philippe Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 16, 2003 Report Share Posted January 16, 2003 Dear Ash, thank you for this calculation of the delay on the husband's chart. I see you are making a link between temporary arrangements and connections to 6th lord. Are there some rules about this particular point ? I don't get the same scores for the planets in the worksheet. I find that only Mercury and Jupiter have more than 12 points for house VII. I checked but couldn't find a mistake. Did I neglect something ? I also would like to ask you a question about 6th lord in VI (this is the case here). I know one should take 8-bindus it gets and also revert the points for the aspects but for 7th house, as 6th lord is also lord of 12th from B, do we have to do so, ie consider its aspects in a reverse way ? Thanks for your help. Best regards Philippe Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 16, 2003 Report Share Posted January 16, 2003 Dear Philippe, I did not know if you and I meant the same thing when I said temporary. When I say temporary, what I mean is that the result will happen but it would be temporary and will revert later on making it feel like a temporary arrangement. 6th lord is 12th from 7th house so indicates loss to house 7th. If 6th lord is connected to 7th lord then it could indicate that if a planet is strong enough or eager to give result, then the result will happen but it will have flavour of 6th or seperation can occur, or there can be some problem. In an old discussion, Krushnaji had mentioned that its better to have the 12th lord from a house to have low points in the worksheet also. 6th lord in the 6th I did take 8-bindus. In our case Mars has 5 bindus and is in 6th house, so I took Mars to have 3 bindus and then taken the aspect of +5 so basically compute the worksheet considering Mars having 3 bindus and not 5. So mars will strengthen other planets. Even planets in 6th house will reverse its quality. So 6th house and planets in 6th and its lord, I think we have to be very careful. As we discuss more and more, I think it will get more clear. Thanking you, Cheers !!! Ash , " philippe bonin " <philippe.bonin@w...> wrote: > Dear Ash, > > thank you for this calculation of the delay on the husband's chart. > I see you are making a link between temporary arrangements and connections > to 6th lord. Are there some rules about this particular point ? > > I don't get the same scores for the planets in the worksheet. I find that > only Mercury and Jupiter have more than 12 points for house VII. I checked > but couldn't find a mistake. Did I neglect something ? > I also would like to ask you a question about 6th lord in VI (this is the > case here). I know one should take 8-bindus it gets and also revert the > points for the aspects but for 7th house, as 6th lord is also lord of 12th > from B, do we have to do so, ie consider its aspects in a reverse way ? > > Thanks for your help. > Best regards > Philippe Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 17, 2003 Report Share Posted January 17, 2003 Hello Philippe, As for the mainlord, Yes, being in sign or nakshatra or navamsa is OK , the relationship does’nt have to be samdharmi necessarily. So for death, if the mainlord is related : in sign, nakshatra, navamsa, conjunct (I suppose also works) or samdharmi. As for her father’s death Krushna pointed out that Saturn was in Moon sign, so Moon will act for Saturn. Samdharmi means that planets can have “same action”. I overlooked that. Best regards Margarita -----Original Message----- philippe bonin [philippe.bonin] Thursday, January 16, 2003 6:49 PM To: Subject: Re:Question about a chart Hello Margarita, thank you for your encouragements. You're right, one could hesitate a lot, in the husband's chart , between Libra and Scorpio ascendant. Knowing the man (who is a friend of mine) I had finally taken the Scorpio ascendant because it seems to fit his temper better. As for his first child, Mars is samdharmi to the Sun (it is in Sun's navamsa for the rectified TOB) and the Sun is lord of D for house V=B. Mars is aspecting house A and C but I thought that for samdharmis it didn't prevent them from giving the event. Concerning his wife's accident when she was young, you wrote that the main lord is often connected to lord of A. From your analysis, it seems that it doesn't have to be samdharmi to lord of A, it can just occupy its sign (or perhaps also its nakshatra ?) Am I right? As for the father's death in the wife's chart, I don't understand how the Moon could act for Saturn. I thought, Saturn being in Moon's navamsa, that Saturn could act for the Moon but not the contrary. Could you please correct me ? Thank you for your analysis on these charts. Best regards Philippe Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 17, 2003 Report Share Posted January 17, 2003 Dear Margarita and Ash, thanks a lot for sharing your experience on these charts. Margarita, thank you for the clarifications about main lord, I think I got the point now. Ash, thank you for your comments about 6th house and planets in 6th. As you pointed out, dealing with the effects of 6th house seems to require a lot of caution. I don't understand either why in the husband's chart, the rule given by Krushna seems to be violated. Maybe Krushna could clear the point when he gets some more time. Hoping we'll work together on more cases through this list. Best regards Philippe Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 17, 2003 Report Share Posted January 17, 2003 Dear Philippe, I am with Margarita on that one... I am glad that you joined the band wagon. Yes, you have a good knowledge of the system and by us discussing charts we all will learn. The best part is that this system is such that all of us should ideally come up with the same answer because its so mathematical. Cheers !!! Happy Makar Sankranti to all, Ash , " philippe bonin " <philippe.bonin@w...> wrote: > > Dear Margarita and Ash, > > thanks a lot for sharing your experience on these charts. > Margarita, thank you for the clarifications about main lord, I think I got > the point now. > Ash, thank you for your comments about 6th house and planets in 6th. As you > pointed out, dealing with the effects of 6th house seems to require a lot of > caution. I don't understand either why in the husband's chart, the rule > given by Krushna seems to be violated. Maybe Krushna could clear the point > when he gets some more time. > > Hoping we'll work together on more cases through this list. > > Best regards > Philippe Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.