Guest guest Posted January 20, 2003 Report Share Posted January 20, 2003 Dear Ash, I got again through Krushna's mail about Peter's chart you have referred to. If I understood it well, the planet in the subdivision of the 6th lord can give the result but then it will spoil it. So I think that's what happened here. Now this leads to a question: how can we determine whether the planet won't give the result or will give it and then spoil it ? Did the question come up in previous mails some time ago? Best regards Philippe Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 20, 2003 Report Share Posted January 20, 2003 Dear Philippe, In Peters case it did not give the result or child birth. Krushnaji, saw that from his chart. Lets wait for Margarita and other list members to comment on the same and if eventually after all brain storming we cant come up with a concrete answer, lets approach Krushnaji to guide us. Atleast in the mean time, we try to find the answers ourselves by discussing. Maybe even Dennis can throw some light on this topic from his experiences. Thanking you, Cheers !!! Ash , " philippe bonin " <philippe.bonin@w...> wrote: > Dear Ash, > > I got again through Krushna's mail about Peter's chart you have referred to. > If I understood it well, the planet in the subdivision of the 6th lord can > give the result but then it will spoil it. So I think that's what happened > here. > Now this leads to a question: how can we determine whether the planet won't > give the result or will give it and then spoil it ? Did the question come up > in previous mails some time ago? > > Best regards > Philippe Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 20, 2003 Report Share Posted January 20, 2003 Dear Peter, I hope that you did not feel bad for our discussion and me referring to your chart as an example and as an learning opportunity. I am sorry, if you have felt bad as that is not my intention. Thanking you, Ash , " ashsam73 <ashsam73@h...> " <ashsam73@h...> wrote: > Dear Philippe, > In Peters case it did not give the result or child birth. Krushnaji, > saw that from his chart. > Lets wait for Margarita and other list members to comment on the same > and if eventually after all brain storming we cant come up with a > concrete answer, lets approach Krushnaji to guide us. > Atleast in the mean time, we try to find the answers ourselves by > discussing. Maybe even Dennis can throw some light on this topic > from his experiences. > Thanking you, > Cheers !!! > Ash > > , " philippe bonin " > <philippe.bonin@w...> wrote: > > Dear Ash, > > > > I got again through Krushna's mail about Peter's chart you have > referred to. > > If I understood it well, the planet in the subdivision of the 6th > lord can > > give the result but then it will spoil it. So I think that's what > happened > > here. > > Now this leads to a question: how can we determine whether the > planet won't > > give the result or will give it and then spoil it ? Did the > question come up > > in previous mails some time ago? > > > > Best regards > > Philippe Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 20, 2003 Report Share Posted January 20, 2003 Hi all, In my chart Venus was in the 6th house and Krushna said it was unable to gifve a result, on theother hand he did say that it often caused diabetes which in fact I have had for the last 7 or 8 years. Peter Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 20, 2003 Report Share Posted January 20, 2003 Hi Ash, I don't mind in the least that you are using my chart as a learning example, in fact I told Krushna that this was the case. He himself did a very good analysis of my whole life, he missed out on a couple of things which had happened but those he did mention were all very accurate. Margarita also tried several things frommy chart and I believe my wife's but this was in her early days and she had quite a few problems with it. Peter Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 21, 2003 Report Share Posted January 21, 2003 Hello Ash, I dug up Peter’s chart but only have the first mail Krushna made about it saying that the only planets that could give children were Sun and Mars because they have enough points. I lost the other mails on my computer and didn’t print them. But in fact Peter has no children, or better his wife couldn’t get any. I remember discussing his wife’s chart and having a lot of trouble until Krushna changed the lagna from Capricorn to Aqaurius; then things seemed fine. So his wife’s chart was responsible for not having children. I suppose we have to look at both charts, wife and husband. We must not overlook the fact that someone can have no legitimate children but a lot of natural ones perhaps without him knowing about it …. Best regards Margarita -----Original Message----- ashsam73 <ashsam73 [ashsam73] Monday, January 20, 2003 5:58 PM To: Subject: Re:Any thoughts? Dear Philippe, In Peters case it did not give the result or child birth. Krushnaji, saw that from his chart. Lets wait for Margarita and other list members to comment on the same and if eventually after all brain storming we cant come up with a concrete answer, lets approach Krushnaji to guide us. Atleast in the mean time, we try to find the answers ourselves by discussing. Maybe even Dennis can throw some light on this topic from his experiences. Thanking you, Cheers !!! Ash , " philippe bonin " <philippe.bonin@w...> wrote: > Dear Ash, > > I got again through Krushna's mail about Peter's chart you have referred to. > If I understood it well, the planet in the subdivision of the 6th lord can > give the result but then it will spoil it. So I think that's what happened > here. > Now this leads to a question: how can we determine whether the planet won't > give the result or will give it and then spoil it ? Did the question come up > in previous mails some time ago? > > Best regards > Philippe Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 21, 2003 Report Share Posted January 21, 2003 Dear Margarita, Actually, I had asked why Jupiter being LOD (from my memory, ) was left out as a planet as it could give children. So Krushnaji had directed us to look at the Saptamsa (D7) and look at where Jupiter was placed. Jupiter was placed in the sign of 6th house in Rasi i.e. Cancer. This ruled Jupiter out from giving children + the fact that it aspected significator house. Another point was the fact that Jupiter aspected one of the house, A, B or C and was placed in Saptamsa in sign of 6th lord of Rasi. Now period of Mars and Sun was very short if my memory serves me right in Peters chart so that could mean that during the same time if his wifes chart did not show similar reciporaction of good antra then chances would be less .. but still I am not satisfied, because Krushnaji had not seen Peter's wifes chart and he had asked indirectly so he knew from the chart so Krushnaji must have been sure of that fact only he was being polite about it ??? Margarita, I will look for those mails in the archives and If I find them I will paste them in an email so its easy reference rather than you going through your entire database. Going forward I shall do that so it makes it easy for list members to relate to old posts. ahh.. I see your point about having children but not knowing about them... good point. Thanks, Cheers !!! Ash , " dmlettens " <dmlettens@s...> wrote: > Hello Ash, > I dug up Peter's chart but only have the first mail Krushna made about it > saying that the only planets that could give children were Sun and Mars > because they have enough points. I lost the other mails on my computer and > didn't print them. But in fact Peter has no children, or better his wife > couldn't get any. I remember discussing his wife's chart and having a lot of > trouble until Krushna changed the lagna from Capricorn to Aqaurius; then > things seemed fine. So his wife's chart was responsible for not having > children. I suppose we have to look at both charts, wife and husband. We > must not overlook the fact that someone can have no legitimate children but > a lot of natural ones perhaps without him knowing about it …. > Best regards > Margarita > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 21, 2003 Report Share Posted January 21, 2003 Hi Ash, Actually Krushna did see my wifes chart very early on before the list really got going. I think he said at the time that he thought the wife's birth time was out but it was rectified and three other astrologers had said they thought the time was spot on so I was not so sure about Krushna's time. There were of course other things which tended to eliminate Krushna's time so I am still not sure. Peter S Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 22, 2003 Report Share Posted January 22, 2003 Dear Peter, Thank you for clarifying that. All your discussion happened way before I knew about this list. So right now I am going back and doing the exercises that were given, playing catch up. Peter, as I am reading the archives, I have learnt a lot from the questions you had asked. Actually I had similar questions when reading up past posts, and you and Sanjay, Margarita, Sach, Prakash, Sandy, Donna, Christine, Silvia (pardon me if I have forgotton the names of others) for had asked questions to clarify which are really helping me understand this system. I hope that more members take part in this system it truely is unique. I hope that you start contributing again. Cheers !!! Ash , " Peter " <petermay@p...> wrote: > Hi Ash, > Actually Krushna did see my wifes chart very early on before the list really > got going. I think he said at the time that he thought the wife's birth time > was out but it was rectified and three other astrologers had said they > thought the time was spot on so I was not so sure about Krushna's time. > There were of course other things which tended to eliminate Krushna's time > so I am still not sure. > > Peter S Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.