Guest guest Posted February 6, 2003 Report Share Posted February 6, 2003 Resp Sir; Attaching the discussion I had with u . U had rightly predicted the child birth (Boy born in Nov-). Does that mean that 6.50 am as calculated by u is my ACTUAL birth time?????. How are my business prospects now?. Am currently in an financial services business which is doing pretty well. But am dissatisfied by the money part. When do u think I would be really succesful, sir.?? Rgds Atul , " krushanain " <krushanain> wrote: > Dear Atul, > As your birth time is doubtful, so before going for any other > result, we must wait. If the results given for 2nd child and good > period from jan 2002, will be a check for rectification of the time. > This is a study group, not for helping in prediction, As I found your > chart not matching with the result, I have taken it for discussion. > It will be good if you study the system, and then we can have more > discussion on the matter. > This system can give the result with a good accuracy, If you > show your chart to any other person, following any other system, will > tell you, your coming period will not be good. > The important result about 2nd child birth is given, Birth of > child is not 100% in the hands of human being, but one can restrict > it. So wait and see. If you find interest in this system study it. > Good luck. > krushna > > , " atul_yh " <atul_yh> wrote: > > Resp Sir; > > > > What more deatils would U req???. > > > > I would provide the same. > > > > > > > > > > > > Rgds > > > > Atul > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > , " krushanain " > <krushanain> > > wrote: > > > Dear Atul, > > > With your rectified time, 2nd child is indicated soon. > > Your > > > period will be changing from 7th jan 2002. some better prospects > in > > > your bussiness. > > > Regarding the period you have told that from 87 to 91 > was > > > worst, in my opinion you must have experienced some bad results > for > > > different houses. Initially for service then for other matters. > > > Still I am not satisfied with your birth time > correction. > > > More events are required to tally with the chart. It's all right > > for > > > the time being. > > > If you have 2nd child in near future ( even conception) > > > then we can say we are nearer to correct birth time. > > > krushna > > > > > > > > > > > > -- In , " atul_yh " <atul_yh> > wrote: > > > > Dear sir; > > > > > > > > Quite possible. > > > > > > > > Marital relations r O.K. > > > > > > > > > > > > Completed my studies in Jan 1993. > > > > > > > > From 1987-1991 was the worst period in my life (Till now???). > > > > > > > > > > > > My peak time in career was from June 1996 to march 1997. > > > > > > > > Sir,what about my business???. > > > > > > > > Any 2nd child indicated??? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > , " krushanain " > > > <krushanain> > > > > wrote: > > > > > Dear Atul, > > > > > This indicates that your birth time is not correct. > > It > > > > > should be about 6:50 am. or 6:49am. The difference is about > 40 > > > min > > > > in > > > > > negative direction. With this new time both events that of > your > > > > > marriage and birth of child maches. Your trend for going in > > your > > > > own > > > > > business also indicated by the same. > > > > > Is there any possibilty for this time? It may > happen, > > > > that > > > > > the time might have been recorded after finishing every thing > > and > > > > > after coming out of the labour room. Or some one might have > > > > rectified > > > > > it. > > > > > As you have not written any thing about your > marrital > > > > > relations , so I take it granted that those are O.K. There > fore > > > > your > > > > > birth time should be around 6:50. > > > > > krushna > > > > > > > > > > , " atul_yh " > <atul_yh> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > Resp Sir; > > > > > > > > > > > > 72:50 Lon > > > > > > 18:58 lat. > > > > > > > > > > > > I have a daughter who was born on 20th Sept 1998. > > > > > > > > > > > > rgds > > > > > > > > > > > > atul > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > , " krushanain " > > > > > <krushanain> > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > Dear Atul, > > > > > > > Your birth time does not seems to match with your > > > > > marriage > > > > > > > date. It should be before 6:50 am. > > > > > > > With the time you have given 1) your marriage may > > not > > > > be > > > > > > > happy, or no child birth. > > > > > > > You have not given any details about your > chidren. > > > > > > > Please let us know exact position. > > > > > > > krushna > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- In , " atul_yh " > > <atul_yh> > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > NAME:- ATUL > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > DOB:- 12TH OCT 1966 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > TIME 7.35 AM > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > PLACE MUMBAI (PANVEL) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > MARRIAGE DATE 23/O5/1993. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > INQUERY REGDS :-CAREER.,NATURE, TYPE, OUTSIDE OR WITHIN > > > INDIA > > > > > > > > QUALIFICATION:- CHARTEREDACCOUNTATNT. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > DID JOB TILL 2000 AUG, GOT INTO BUSINESS SINCE THEN. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 6, 2003 Report Share Posted February 6, 2003 Dear Atul, In the message, you have missed this phrase: " It will be good if you study the system, and then we can have more discussion on the matter " . What about your study of the system? Best regards Denis Pour des renseignements sur les séminaires, les consultations et les cours par correspondance, ainsi que pour des logiciels et des leçonsd'astrologie gratuits, visitez mon site : www.astrocours.fr.st - <atul_yh Thursday, February 06, 2003 3:34 PM Accurate, much more req > Resp Sir; > Attaching the discussion I had with u . U had rightly predicted the > child birth (Boy born in Nov-). Does that mean that 6.50 am as > calculated by u is my ACTUAL birth time?????. > > How are my business prospects now?. > Am currently in an financial services business which is doing pretty > well. But am dissatisfied by the money part. When do u think I would > be really succesful, sir.?? > > Rgds > > > Atul > > > > , " krushanain " > <krushanain> wrote: > > Dear Atul, > > As your birth time is doubtful, so before going for any > other > > result, we must wait. If the results given for 2nd child and good > > period from jan 2002, will be a check for rectification of the > time. > > This is a study group, not for helping in prediction, As I found > your > > chart not matching with the result, I have taken it for discussion. > > It will be good if you study the system, and then we can have more > > discussion on the matter. > > This system can give the result with a good accuracy, If you > > show your chart to any other person, following any other system, > will > > tell you, your coming period will not be good. > > The important result about 2nd child birth is given, Birth > of > > child is not 100% in the hands of human being, but one can restrict > > it. So wait and see. If you find interest in this system study it. > > Good luck. > > krushna > > > > , " atul_yh " <atul_yh> > wrote: > > > Resp Sir; > > > > > > What more deatils would U req???. > > > > > > I would provide the same. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Rgds > > > > > > Atul > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > , " krushanain " > > <krushanain> > > > wrote: > > > > Dear Atul, > > > > With your rectified time, 2nd child is indicated > soon. > > > Your > > > > period will be changing from 7th jan 2002. some better > prospects > > in > > > > your bussiness. > > > > Regarding the period you have told that from 87 to 91 > > was > > > > worst, in my opinion you must have experienced some bad results > > for > > > > different houses. Initially for service then for other matters. > > > > Still I am not satisfied with your birth time > > correction. > > > > More events are required to tally with the chart. It's all > right > > > for > > > > the time being. > > > > If you have 2nd child in near future ( even > conception) > > > > then we can say we are nearer to correct birth time. > > > > krushna > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- In , " atul_yh " <atul_yh> > > wrote: > > > > > Dear sir; > > > > > > > > > > Quite possible. > > > > > > > > > > Marital relations r O.K. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Completed my studies in Jan 1993. > > > > > > > > > > From 1987-1991 was the worst period in my life (Till now???). > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > My peak time in career was from June 1996 to march 1997. > > > > > > > > > > Sir,what about my business???. > > > > > > > > > > Any 2nd child indicated??? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > , " krushanain " > > > > <krushanain> > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > Dear Atul, > > > > > > This indicates that your birth time is not > correct. > > > It > > > > > > should be about 6:50 am. or 6:49am. The difference is about > > 40 > > > > min > > > > > in > > > > > > negative direction. With this new time both events that of > > your > > > > > > marriage and birth of child maches. Your trend for going in > > > your > > > > > own > > > > > > business also indicated by the same. > > > > > > Is there any possibilty for this time? It may > > happen, > > > > > that > > > > > > the time might have been recorded after finishing every > thing > > > and > > > > > > after coming out of the labour room. Or some one might have > > > > > rectified > > > > > > it. > > > > > > As you have not written any thing about your > > marrital > > > > > > relations , so I take it granted that those are O.K. There > > fore > > > > > your > > > > > > birth time should be around 6:50. > > > > > > krushna > > > > > > > > > > > > , " atul_yh " > > <atul_yh> > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > Resp Sir; > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 72:50 Lon > > > > > > > 18:58 lat. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I have a daughter who was born on 20th Sept 1998. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > rgds > > > > > > > > > > > > > > atul > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > , " krushanain " > > > > > > <krushanain> > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > Dear Atul, > > > > > > > > Your birth time does not seems to match with > your > > > > > > marriage > > > > > > > > date. It should be before 6:50 am. > > > > > > > > With the time you have given 1) your marriage > may > > > not > > > > > be > > > > > > > > happy, or no child birth. > > > > > > > > You have not given any details about your > > chidren. > > > > > > > > Please let us know exact position. > > > > > > > > krushna > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- In , " atul_yh " > > > <atul_yh> > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > NAME:- ATUL > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > DOB:- 12TH OCT 1966 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > TIME 7.35 AM > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > PLACE MUMBAI (PANVEL) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > MARRIAGE DATE 23/O5/1993. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > INQUERY REGDS :-CAREER.,NATURE, TYPE, OUTSIDE OR > WITHIN > > > > INDIA > > > > > > > > > QUALIFICATION:- CHARTEREDACCOUNTATNT. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > DID JOB TILL 2000 AUG, GOT INTO BUSINESS SINCE THEN. > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 6, 2003 Report Share Posted February 6, 2003 U are right. Apologies. But curosity always overpowers!!!.. Rgds Atul , Denis Labouré <Laboure@W...> wrote: > Dear Atul, > > In the message, you have missed this phrase: " It will be good if you study > the system, and then we can have more > discussion on the matter " . > What about your study of the system? > > Best regards > Denis > > > Pour des renseignements sur les séminaires, les consultations et les cours > par correspondance, ainsi que pour des logiciels et des leçonsd'astrologie > gratuits, visitez mon site : www.astrocours.fr.st > - > <atul_yh> > > Thursday, February 06, 2003 3:34 PM > Accurate, much more req > > > > Resp Sir; > > Attaching the discussion I had with u . U had rightly predicted the > > child birth (Boy born in Nov-). Does that mean that 6.50 am as > > calculated by u is my ACTUAL birth time?????. > > > > How are my business prospects now?. > > Am currently in an financial services business which is doing pretty > > well. But am dissatisfied by the money part. When do u think I would > > be really succesful, sir.?? > > > > Rgds > > > > > > Atul > > > > > > > > , " krushanain " > > <krushanain> wrote: > > > Dear Atul, > > > As your birth time is doubtful, so before going for any > > other > > > result, we must wait. If the results given for 2nd child and good > > > period from jan 2002, will be a check for rectification of the > > time. > > > This is a study group, not for helping in prediction, As I found > > your > > > chart not matching with the result, I have taken it for discussion. > > > It will be good if you study the system, and then we can have more > > > discussion on the matter. > > > This system can give the result with a good accuracy, If you > > > show your chart to any other person, following any other system, > > will > > > tell you, your coming period will not be good. > > > The important result about 2nd child birth is given, Birth > > of > > > child is not 100% in the hands of human being, but one can restrict > > > it. So wait and see. If you find interest in this system study it. > > > Good luck. > > > krushna > > > > > > , " atul_yh " <atul_yh> > > wrote: > > > > Resp Sir; > > > > > > > > What more deatils would U req???. > > > > > > > > I would provide the same. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Rgds > > > > > > > > Atul > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > , " krushanain " > > > <krushanain> > > > > wrote: > > > > > Dear Atul, > > > > > With your rectified time, 2nd child is indicated > > soon. > > > > Your > > > > > period will be changing from 7th jan 2002. some better > > prospects > > > in > > > > > your bussiness. > > > > > Regarding the period you have told that from 87 to 91 > > > was > > > > > worst, in my opinion you must have experienced some bad results > > > for > > > > > different houses. Initially for service then for other matters. > > > > > Still I am not satisfied with your birth time > > > correction. > > > > > More events are required to tally with the chart. It's all > > right > > > > for > > > > > the time being. > > > > > If you have 2nd child in near future ( even > > conception) > > > > > then we can say we are nearer to correct birth time. > > > > > krushna > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- In , " atul_yh " <atul_yh> > > > wrote: > > > > > > Dear sir; > > > > > > > > > > > > Quite possible. > > > > > > > > > > > > Marital relations r O.K. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Completed my studies in Jan 1993. > > > > > > > > > > > > From 1987-1991 was the worst period in my life (Till now???). > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > My peak time in career was from June 1996 to march 1997. > > > > > > > > > > > > Sir,what about my business???. > > > > > > > > > > > > Any 2nd child indicated??? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > , " krushanain " > > > > > <krushanain> > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > Dear Atul, > > > > > > > This indicates that your birth time is not > > correct. > > > > It > > > > > > > should be about 6:50 am. or 6:49am. The difference is about > > > 40 > > > > > min > > > > > > in > > > > > > > negative direction. With this new time both events that of > > > your > > > > > > > marriage and birth of child maches. Your trend for going in > > > > your > > > > > > own > > > > > > > business also indicated by the same. > > > > > > > Is there any possibilty for this time? It may > > > happen, > > > > > > that > > > > > > > the time might have been recorded after finishing every > > thing > > > > and > > > > > > > after coming out of the labour room. Or some one might have > > > > > > rectified > > > > > > > it. > > > > > > > As you have not written any thing about your > > > marrital > > > > > > > relations , so I take it granted that those are O.K. There > > > fore > > > > > > your > > > > > > > birth time should be around 6:50. > > > > > > > krushna > > > > > > > > > > > > > > , " atul_yh " > > > <atul_yh> > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > Resp Sir; > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 72:50 Lon > > > > > > > > 18:58 lat. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I have a daughter who was born on 20th Sept 1998. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > rgds > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > atul > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > , " krushanain " > > > > > > > <krushanain> > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > Dear Atul, > > > > > > > > > Your birth time does not seems to match with > > your > > > > > > > marriage > > > > > > > > > date. It should be before 6:50 am. > > > > > > > > > With the time you have given 1) your marriage > > may > > > > not > > > > > > be > > > > > > > > > happy, or no child birth. > > > > > > > > > You have not given any details about your > > > chidren. > > > > > > > > > Please let us know exact position. > > > > > > > > > krushna > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- In , " atul_yh " > > > > <atul_yh> > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > NAME:- ATUL > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > DOB:- 12TH OCT 1966 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > TIME 7.35 AM > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > PLACE MUMBAI (PANVEL) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > MARRIAGE DATE 23/O5/1993. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > INQUERY REGDS :-CAREER.,NATURE, TYPE, OUTSIDE OR > > WITHIN > > > > > INDIA > > > > > > > > > > QUALIFICATION:- CHARTEREDACCOUNTATNT. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > DID JOB TILL 2000 AUG, GOT INTO BUSINESS SINCE THEN. > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.