Guest guest Posted February 15, 2003 Report Share Posted February 15, 2003 Dear Sir, In line with my realisation that selfstudy need to precede questions, I have downloaded all the lessons form the group site as well as the worksheets. On inputing the factors (plus the new birth timing and the new ayanamsa), Venus and Jupiter appears to be the strongest planets . This has been derived from the worksheet " master worksheet 4.09 " . Two problems:- Does venus get neechbhanga??. If not then isnt there a contradiction with the traditional canons of astrology??. Venes being one of the strongest according to astavarga system, but being neech in lagna. How would the antra unfold (in Rahu dasa??) More questions, but as I go ahead. Rgds Atul , " atul_yh <atul_yh> " <atul_yh> wrote: > Resp Sir; > Attaching the discussion I had with u . U had rightly predicted the > child birth (Boy born in Nov-). Does that mean that 6.50 am as > calculated by u is my ACTUAL birth time?????. > > How are my business prospects now?. > Am currently in an financial services business which is doing pretty > well. But am dissatisfied by the money part. When do u think I would > be really succesful, sir.?? > > Rgds > > > Atul > > > > , " krushanain " > <krushanain> wrote: > > Dear Atul, > > As your birth time is doubtful, so before going for any > other > > result, we must wait. If the results given for 2nd child and good > > period from jan 2002, will be a check for rectification of the > time. > > This is a study group, not for helping in prediction, As I found > your > > chart not matching with the result, I have taken it for discussion. > > It will be good if you study the system, and then we can have more > > discussion on the matter. > > This system can give the result with a good accuracy, If you > > show your chart to any other person, following any other system, > will > > tell you, your coming period will not be good. > > The important result about 2nd child birth is given, Birth > of > > child is not 100% in the hands of human being, but one can restrict > > it. So wait and see. If you find interest in this system study it. > > Good luck. > > krushna > > > > , " atul_yh " <atul_yh> > wrote: > > > Resp Sir; > > > > > > What more deatils would U req???. > > > > > > I would provide the same. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Rgds > > > > > > Atul > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > , " krushanain " > > <krushanain> > > > wrote: > > > > Dear Atul, > > > > With your rectified time, 2nd child is indicated > soon. > > > Your > > > > period will be changing from 7th jan 2002. some better > prospects > > in > > > > your bussiness. > > > > Regarding the period you have told that from 87 to 91 > > was > > > > worst, in my opinion you must have experienced some bad results > > for > > > > different houses. Initially for service then for other matters. > > > > Still I am not satisfied with your birth time > > correction. > > > > More events are required to tally with the chart. It's all > right > > > for > > > > the time being. > > > > If you have 2nd child in near future ( even > conception) > > > > then we can say we are nearer to correct birth time. > > > > krushna > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- In , " atul_yh " <atul_yh> > > wrote: > > > > > Dear sir; > > > > > > > > > > Quite possible. > > > > > > > > > > Marital relations r O.K. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Completed my studies in Jan 1993. > > > > > > > > > > From 1987-1991 was the worst period in my life (Till now???). > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > My peak time in career was from June 1996 to march 1997. > > > > > > > > > > Sir,what about my business???. > > > > > > > > > > Any 2nd child indicated??? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > , " krushanain " > > > > <krushanain> > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > Dear Atul, > > > > > > This indicates that your birth time is not > correct. > > > It > > > > > > should be about 6:50 am. or 6:49am. The difference is about > > 40 > > > > min > > > > > in > > > > > > negative direction. With this new time both events that of > > your > > > > > > marriage and birth of child maches. Your trend for going in > > > your > > > > > own > > > > > > business also indicated by the same. > > > > > > Is there any possibilty for this time? It may > > happen, > > > > > that > > > > > > the time might have been recorded after finishing every > thing > > > and > > > > > > after coming out of the labour room. Or some one might have > > > > > rectified > > > > > > it. > > > > > > As you have not written any thing about your > > marrital > > > > > > relations , so I take it granted that those are O.K. There > > fore > > > > > your > > > > > > birth time should be around 6:50. > > > > > > krushna > > > > > > > > > > > > , " atul_yh " > > <atul_yh> > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > Resp Sir; > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 72:50 Lon > > > > > > > 18:58 lat. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I have a daughter who was born on 20th Sept 1998. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > rgds > > > > > > > > > > > > > > atul > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > , " krushanain " > > > > > > <krushanain> > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > Dear Atul, > > > > > > > > Your birth time does not seems to match with > your > > > > > > marriage > > > > > > > > date. It should be before 6:50 am. > > > > > > > > With the time you have given 1) your marriage > may > > > not > > > > > be > > > > > > > > happy, or no child birth. > > > > > > > > You have not given any details about your > > chidren. > > > > > > > > Please let us know exact position. > > > > > > > > krushna > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- In , " atul_yh " > > > <atul_yh> > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > NAME:- ATUL > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > DOB:- 12TH OCT 1966 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > TIME 7.35 AM > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > PLACE MUMBAI (PANVEL) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > MARRIAGE DATE 23/O5/1993. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > INQUERY REGDS :-CAREER.,NATURE, TYPE, OUTSIDE OR > WITHIN > > > > INDIA > > > > > > > > > QUALIFICATION:- CHARTEREDACCOUNTATNT. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > DID JOB TILL 2000 AUG, GOT INTO BUSINESS SINCE THEN. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 16, 2003 Report Share Posted February 16, 2003 Dear Atul, Ashtakavarga is a part of Vedic Astrology. Venus by virtue of getting high points in the worksheet is capable of giving result during its antardasa. Find out where Venus is placed in Navamsa, and Venus then becomes samdharmi to the lord of sign where its placed in Navamsa. You do not have to consider Neechbhanga yoga seperately. The worksheet gives the actual strenght. From the worksheet you can at a glance see based on the position of Venus in Rasi on how it will act for all 12 houses. Venus will not be bad even if it has low points for houses for who it is lord of D and E and you have to be careful in judgement if Venus is Lord of 12th house and has high points of if its lord of 6th house. Venus will also not give result itself for the house it aspects House A, B or C but its samdharmi will come forward and give the result. For Main period, Rahu in your case, find out who rahu respresnts i.e. sign lord and nakshatra lord and see which house they own and the karaktwa goes to which house. The result will be linked to those house. Thanking you, Cheers !!! Ash , " atul_yh <atul_yh> " <atul_yh> wrote: > Dear Sir, > In line with my realisation that selfstudy need to precede questions, > I have downloaded all the lessons form the group site as well as the > worksheets. > > On inputing the factors (plus the new birth timing and the new > ayanamsa), Venus and Jupiter appears to be the strongest planets . > This has been derived from the worksheet " master worksheet 4.09 " . > Two problems:- > > Does venus get neechbhanga??. If not then isnt there a contradiction > with the traditional canons of astrology??. Venes being one of the > strongest according to astavarga system, but being neech in lagna. > How would the antra unfold (in Rahu dasa??) > > More questions, but as I go ahead. > > Rgds > Atul > , " atul_yh > <atul_yh> " <atul_yh> wrote: > > Resp Sir; > > Attaching the discussion I had with u . U had rightly predicted the > > child birth (Boy born in Nov-). Does that mean that 6.50 am as > > calculated by u is my ACTUAL birth time?????. > > > > How are my business prospects now?. > > Am currently in an financial services business which is doing > pretty > > well. But am dissatisfied by the money part. When do u think I > would > > be really succesful, sir.?? > > > > Rgds > > > > > > Atul > > > > > > > > , " krushanain " > > <krushanain> wrote: > > > Dear Atul, > > > As your birth time is doubtful, so before going for any > > other > > > result, we must wait. If the results given for 2nd child and good > > > period from jan 2002, will be a check for rectification of the > > time. > > > This is a study group, not for helping in prediction, As I found > > your > > > chart not matching with the result, I have taken it for > discussion. > > > It will be good if you study the system, and then we can have > more > > > discussion on the matter. > > > This system can give the result with a good accuracy, If > you > > > show your chart to any other person, following any other system, > > will > > > tell you, your coming period will not be good. > > > The important result about 2nd child birth is given, Birth > > of > > > child is not 100% in the hands of human being, but one can > restrict > > > it. So wait and see. If you find interest in this system study > it. > > > Good luck. > > > krushna > > > > > > , " atul_yh " <atul_yh> > > wrote: > > > > Resp Sir; > > > > > > > > What more deatils would U req???. > > > > > > > > I would provide the same. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Rgds > > > > > > > > Atul > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > , " krushanain " > > > <krushanain> > > > > wrote: > > > > > Dear Atul, > > > > > With your rectified time, 2nd child is indicated > > soon. > > > > Your > > > > > period will be changing from 7th jan 2002. some better > > prospects > > > in > > > > > your bussiness. > > > > > Regarding the period you have told that from 87 to > 91 > > > was > > > > > worst, in my opinion you must have experienced some bad > results > > > for > > > > > different houses. Initially for service then for other > matters. > > > > > Still I am not satisfied with your birth time > > > correction. > > > > > More events are required to tally with the chart. It's all > > right > > > > for > > > > > the time being. > > > > > If you have 2nd child in near future ( even > > conception) > > > > > then we can say we are nearer to correct birth time. > > > > > krushna > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- In , " atul_yh " <atul_yh> > > > wrote: > > > > > > Dear sir; > > > > > > > > > > > > Quite possible. > > > > > > > > > > > > Marital relations r O.K. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Completed my studies in Jan 1993. > > > > > > > > > > > > From 1987-1991 was the worst period in my life (Till > now???). > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > My peak time in career was from June 1996 to march 1997. > > > > > > > > > > > > Sir,what about my business???. > > > > > > > > > > > > Any 2nd child indicated??? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > , " krushanain " > > > > > <krushanain> > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > Dear Atul, > > > > > > > This indicates that your birth time is not > > correct. > > > > It > > > > > > > should be about 6:50 am. or 6:49am. The difference is > about > > > 40 > > > > > min > > > > > > in > > > > > > > negative direction. With this new time both events that > of > > > your > > > > > > > marriage and birth of child maches. Your trend for going > in > > > > your > > > > > > own > > > > > > > business also indicated by the same. > > > > > > > Is there any possibilty for this time? It may > > > happen, > > > > > > that > > > > > > > the time might have been recorded after finishing every > > thing > > > > and > > > > > > > after coming out of the labour room. Or some one might > have > > > > > > rectified > > > > > > > it. > > > > > > > As you have not written any thing about your > > > marrital > > > > > > > relations , so I take it granted that those are O.K. > There > > > fore > > > > > > your > > > > > > > birth time should be around 6:50. > > > > > > > krushna > > > > > > > > > > > > > > , " atul_yh " > > > <atul_yh> > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > Resp Sir; > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 72:50 Lon > > > > > > > > 18:58 lat. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I have a daughter who was born on 20th Sept 1998. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > rgds > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > atul > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > , " krushanain " > > > > > > > <krushanain> > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > Dear Atul, > > > > > > > > > Your birth time does not seems to match with > > your > > > > > > > marriage > > > > > > > > > date. It should be before 6:50 am. > > > > > > > > > With the time you have given 1) your marriage > > may > > > > not > > > > > > be > > > > > > > > > happy, or no child birth. > > > > > > > > > You have not given any details about your > > > chidren. > > > > > > > > > Please let us know exact position. > > > > > > > > > krushna > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- In , " atul_yh " > > > > <atul_yh> > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > NAME:- ATUL > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > DOB:- 12TH OCT 1966 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > TIME 7.35 AM > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > PLACE MUMBAI (PANVEL) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > MARRIAGE DATE 23/O5/1993. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > INQUERY REGDS :-CAREER.,NATURE, TYPE, OUTSIDE OR > > WITHIN > > > > > INDIA > > > > > > > > > > QUALIFICATION:- CHARTEREDACCOUNTATNT. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > DID JOB TILL 2000 AUG, GOT INTO BUSINESS SINCE THEN. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.