Dear Krushna, Peter, Margarita, Ash etc...

[Guest guest]

Dear respected list members:

 

Thanks for your reply Peter. I did what you said but I am confused

because the navamsha is not calculating as I thought it to be. I am

getting frustrated because this keeps happening, as my rahu/ketu axis

seems to be very sensitive in the navamsha to minor changes in

ayanamsha.

 

When I offset the ayanamsha in JHL to match Krushna's ayanamsha for

my birth data (-01:00:52) from Lahiri I got what seemed to be the

correct navmasha according to krushna's system. However, offsetting

the ayanamsha in PL the same it gives different position for

rahu/Ketu axis - as it does when I use -00:26:03 offsetting Raman.

I'm not sure of my birth time to seconds or even the minute, but

there is a sensitvity of the time here and getting the correct chart

is important for me now as I'm trying to get a grip on what is being

taught here. I'm giving my birth details below, I hope I can get some

help here. I don't want an analysis- that is what I want to learn to

do but I need the correct chart first.

 

my data (male)

April 25, 1975 at 15:20

east york, ontario (5:00W)

Canada

If any other events or personal characteristics are reuired please do

not hestitate to ask me, Right now my main concern is getting it

right before moving onwards.

 

Thanks,

 

Puneet

 

, " Peter "

<petermay@p...> wrote:

> Hi Puneet,

> My PL is the old version (ver 5) and I am not sure about the latest

version

> 6.

> In mine I go into Options - Calculations. Thsi brings up a box with

the

> various options including ayanamsas. In the ayanamsas I

choose " Raman " and

> at the bottom of the ayamsas it syas offset and for that I put in -

00:26:03

> and this seems to work for me. Don't forget to tick the Varanihira

box for

> the astakavarga choice.

> I hope that this helps.

>

> Peter S

[Guest guest]

Dear Punit,

Please check, there must be true nodes and mean nodes option.

Please select same option for both program

krushna

 

, " Puneet Joshi "

<sunnyjoshi25> wrote:

> Dear respected list members:

>

> Thanks for your reply Peter. I did what you said but I am confused

> because the navamsha is not calculating as I thought it to be. I am

> getting frustrated because this keeps happening, as my rahu/ketu

axis

> seems to be very sensitive in the navamsha to minor changes in

> ayanamsha.

>

> When I offset the ayanamsha in JHL to match Krushna's ayanamsha for

> my birth data (-01:00:52) from Lahiri I got what seemed to be the

> correct navmasha according to krushna's system. However, offsetting

> the ayanamsha in PL the same it gives different position for

> rahu/Ketu axis - as it does when I use -00:26:03 offsetting Raman.

> I'm not sure of my birth time to seconds or even the minute, but

> there is a sensitvity of the time here and getting the correct

chart

> is important for me now as I'm trying to get a grip on what is

being

> taught here. I'm giving my birth details below, I hope I can get

some

> help here. I don't want an analysis- that is what I want to learn

to

> do but I need the correct chart first.

>

> my data (male)

> April 25, 1975 at 15:20

> east york, ontario (5:00W)

> Canada

> If any other events or personal characteristics are reuired please

do

> not hestitate to ask me, Right now my main concern is getting it

> right before moving onwards.

>

> Thanks,

>

> Puneet

>

> , " Peter "

> <petermay@p...> wrote:

> > Hi Puneet,

> > My PL is the old version (ver 5) and I am not sure about the

latest

> version

> > 6.

> > In mine I go into Options - Calculations. Thsi brings up a box

with

> the

> > various options including ayanamsas. In the ayanamsas I

> choose " Raman " and

> > at the bottom of the ayamsas it syas offset and for that I put

in -

> 00:26:03

> > and this seems to work for me. Don't forget to tick the

Varanihira

> box for

> > the astakavarga choice.

> > I hope that this helps.

> >

> > Peter S

[Guest guest]

Hi Puneet,

I cannot tell you what is wrong with your settings. I had a great deal of

trouble just trying to get a similar chart up because the twp programs gave

different coordinates for York.

 

Looking at the ayanamsas though GJ gave it

22-29-3 and PL 22-30-18.

This is a fair difference and made much different lagnas but as I said I had

great problems even getting a decent chart up from PL.

 

Peter S

[Guest guest]

Dear Krushnaji and Peter,

 

Thanks for replying. I think I got it correct to my acceptance. I

changed the option to mean rahu/ketu and I got what I think is

correct as far as JHL was giving me with Krushna's ayanamsha. i don't

know what the difference is - but hopefully you all are using mean

rahu ketu in your studies/research.

 

In the Toronto area there is North and East York as far as classified

regions within the old York region. I am using the coordinates for

east york : 43n41, 79w20 (5:00 W back then).

 

Thanks to you both, and I feel better about going on.

 

Happy Easter!

 

Sincerely,

Puneet

 

, " krushanain "

<krushanain> wrote:

> Dear Punit,

> Please check, there must be true nodes and mean nodes option.

> Please select same option for both program

> krushna

>