Unsubscribe me

[Guest guest]

--- ashsam73 <ashsam73 wrote:

> Dear Philippe,

>

> I think there is come confusion. Mars in 4th house

> in Capricorn with

> high points lets take example that Mars is in

> capricorn with 5 bindus

> which is 4th house.

> So this mars is in House D with high bindus. So it

> will try to give

> results. At the same time it will " Reduce " 7th

> house matters due to

> its aspect on 7th house. That ends point one.

> Point 2 is the feel. Like its been discussed that

> planets in

> exaltation aspect even with more maleficance. So

> Such an exalted

> Mars will aspect with and its effects " felt " will be

> like -7.

>

> For event to happen u consider mars's dristi of -4.

> For event to

> happen also check Mars is in House D with 5 bindus.

> The cummulative

> effect felt for event to happen is what u select

> from points in the

> WS. But the feeling or results and the force with

> with it will give,

> multiply that effect with 1.4. So if there were to

> be any problems

> they would be aggrivated in a more malefic manner.

>

> Here we will consider Aspect of Mars on 7th house if

> Mars is in

> capricorn and in 4th house as compared to if Mars

> were to be in

> Scorpio in 4th with high bindus as its LoD and we do

> not consider

> dristi of LoD to be Malefic. So if you multiply

> with 1.4 then

> effects would be felt were better as the whole part

> of that Malefic

> dristi on 7th house is taken off so only better

> results will happen

> from WS and felt by multiplication factor.

>

> Sorry if I caused confusion.

>

> I did not understand clearly the last part of the

> mail and your

> confusion. From what I could understand. Consider

> the sign to give

> backing to the event. The event to happen or not

> you check from WS

> but the " quality " and " backing " to the event i.e.

> how it will be felt

> to the native check from multiplication factor.

>

> so Guru in Cancer will get 1.4 times the backing as

> compared to Guru

> in capricorn where the backing from the sign will be

> of 0.5.

>

> Yes these are for antra only. Even in the example

> for MArs in 4th

> with high bindus in capricorn and scorpio as 4th, I

> had asked for

> effect in Mars antar only. As when a planets antra

> comes in

> vimshottari dasha it gets power to act like coming

> under the spot

> light. Now what events will that give is from WS

> and what backing it

> gets so the feeling of the native in that antra is

> from

> multiplification factor.

>

> Maybe a person say " Gets a house " but " he has to

> undergo stress from

> lawyers or builders " if that planet has less backing

> from the house

> it is placed in. But event of getting house

> happened.

>

> I hope that clears things up.

> Thanking you,

> Cheers !!!

> Ash

>

> ,

> " philippe bonin "

> <philippe.bonin@w...> wrote:

> > Hello Margarita and Ash,

> >

> > thank you for your very interesting comments on

> the use of the

> > multiplication factor. Actually, I thought it

> could be used in two

> different

> > ways:

> > - evaluating the quality of the result during the

> antra of a planet

> (that's

> > what you underlined);

> > -evaluating the overall effect of the planet's

> placement in a chart

> > regardless of the antra. That's the way I used it

> when I commented

> the two

> > charts. Maybe my understanding is wrong on that

> but I thought it was

> > possible after reading a recent mail from Ash to

> the list where he

> gave the

> > example of the effect Mars could have in 4th house

> with 5 points

> for two

> > different lagnas (Leo and Libra).

> > For Leo lagna the placement is very good because

> being LOD Mars

> cannot harm

> > seventh house by its aspect but for Libra lagna

> Mars is aspecting

> its own

> > sign Aries with a -5 point aspect which will be

> felt as -7 due to

> the

> > multiplication factor 1.4. So Mars can give

> marriage in its antra

> but this

> > marriage will have to undergo tensions and

> conflicts due to the

> aspect of

> > Mars on seventh house. I had understood this

> problem would affect

> marriage

> > not only in Mars' antra but that this prediction

> belonged to the

> overall

> > analysis of the chart. Maybe that's where I made a

> mistake. Could

> you please

> > correct my understanding?

> >

> > From your examples (getting at the station or the

> airport) there's

> also a

> > point I'm not sure I've got: during the antra of

> the planet, will a

> bad

> > multiplication factor make the result more

> difficult to get or

> spoil the

> > quality of the result even if we know it happens?

> I had understood

> it the

> > second way.

> >

> > Thanks a lot for your help.

> >

> > Best regards

> >

> > Philippe

>

>

 

 

 

 

The New with improved product search