Guest guest Posted March 6, 2004 Report Share Posted March 6, 2004 Hi Donna Bugs are alright, as they are part of software cycle. I am still worried on the formula validity. For example- in lesson 7, the planet in 4th's point to be added for which bindu are less than 4. In your formula, you have considered those planets also, where bindu are equal to 4. At one more place, this more than bindu logic has been not rigidly applied (sheet puts the value for which it is equal to 4 also). Further, point assignment for D and E and planet therein , if you notice - your formula skipped to add 5 points for venus , which is in d/e. (you may note this in my sheet manually done and emailed). Then, for Jupiter aspecting moon (aspect ratio point is missing) and moon aspecting its own sign cancer- you must not deduct any negative points for aspect ratio- ( this is what I interpreted in lesson 7, where in example there venus is excluded for -6 points due to aspected sign being its own sign.) Regards/Prafulla Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 6, 2004 Report Share Posted March 6, 2004 Dear Prafulla, 1) When planet is LoD or LoE and there is a planet in 4th from it with more points than it then it can take points from the planet. That is also a law. 2) Planets aspecting a house with malefic drisit, that will NOT be considered if that planet is LoD or LoE. Thanks, Cheers !!! Ash --- Prafulla Gang <prafulla.gang wrote: > Hi Donna > > Bugs are alright, as they are part of software > cycle. I am still worried > on the formula validity. For example- in lesson 7, > the planet in 4th's > point to be added for which bindu are less than 4. > In your formula, you > have considered those planets also, where bindu are > equal to 4. At one > more place, this more than bindu logic has been not > rigidly applied > (sheet puts the value for which it is equal to 4 > also). > > Further, point assignment for D and E and planet > therein , if you notice > - your formula skipped to add 5 points for venus , > which is in d/e. (you > may note this in my sheet manually done and > emailed). > > Then, for Jupiter aspecting moon (aspect ratio point > is missing) and > moon aspecting its own sign cancer- you must not > deduct any negative > points for aspect ratio- ( this is what I > interpreted in lesson 7, where > in example there venus is excluded for -6 points due > to aspected sign > being its own sign.) > > Regards/Prafulla > > Search - Find what you’re looking for faster http://search. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 6, 2004 Report Share Posted March 6, 2004 Hi Ash and all Happy Holi to you all. I understood. However for 4th aspect, except for overriding rules, it can not take equal to 4. It got to look for less than 4. Next, for aspect, if the planet is aspecting its own sign, then still do we need to assign negative aspect ratio !! (malefic/benefic can be determined on case to case basis) regards/Prafulla -- In , Ash Sam <ashsam73> wrote: > Dear Prafulla, > > 1) When planet is LoD or LoE and there is a planet in > 4th from it with more points than it then it can take > points from the planet. That is also a law. > > 2) Planets aspecting a house with malefic drisit, that > will NOT be considered if that planet is LoD or LoE. > > Thanks, > Cheers !!! > Ash > > > > > --- Prafulla Gang <prafulla.gang@r...> wrote: > > Hi Donna > > > > Bugs are alright, as they are part of software > > cycle. I am still worried > > on the formula validity. For example- in lesson 7, > > the planet in 4th's > > point to be added for which bindu are less than 4. > > In your formula, you > > have considered those planets also, where bindu are > > equal to 4. At one > > more place, this more than bindu logic has been not > > rigidly applied > > (sheet puts the value for which it is equal to 4 > > also). > > > > Further, point assignment for D and E and planet > > therein , if you notice > > - your formula skipped to add 5 points for venus , > > which is in d/e. (you > > may note this in my sheet manually done and > > emailed). > > > > Then, for Jupiter aspecting moon (aspect ratio point > > is missing) and > > moon aspecting its own sign cancer- you must not > > deduct any negative > > points for aspect ratio- ( this is what I > > interpreted in lesson 7, where > > in example there venus is excluded for -6 points due > > to aspected sign > > being its own sign.) > > > > Regards/Prafulla > > > > > > > > > Search - Find what you're looking for faster > http://search. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 7, 2004 Report Share Posted March 7, 2004 Dear Prafulla, Happy Holi to you and all group members. I did not understand your query. I checked the points that you are getting in your chart via the worksheet and its proper. To answer your question. The law is this 1) Planet in 10th place must have Less than 4 points except for which the planet is LoD or LoE in that special case it can Have 4 points. AND AT THE SAME TIME 2) The planet in 4th from it should have MORE POINTS THAN PLANET IN 10TH. These 2 parts of law are TOGETHER and both conditions must be met. Now coming to aspect on own house. Yes if Moon is in Capricorn with say 6 bindus then it WILL aspect 2nd house with -6 bindus EXCEPT for Libra and Aquarius as for Libra, Moon becomes LoD and for Aquarius moon becomes LoE so ONLY for these 2 houses, dristi of Moon will not be -6. This is taken care in the Worksheet. I dont know if the above answered your question. If not please give me which chart you are looking at and which house. Cheers !!! Ash , " Prafulla Gang " <prafulla.gang@r...> wrote: > Hi Ash and all > > Happy Holi to you all. > > I understood. However for 4th aspect, except for overriding rules, > it can not take equal to 4. It got to look for less than 4. > > Next, for aspect, if the planet is aspecting its own sign, then > still do we need to assign negative aspect ratio !! (malefic/benefic > can be determined on case to case basis) > > regards/Prafulla > -- In , Ash Sam > <ashsam73> wrote: > > Dear Prafulla, > > > > 1) When planet is LoD or LoE and there is a planet in > > 4th from it with more points than it then it can take > > points from the planet. That is also a law. > > > > 2) Planets aspecting a house with malefic drisit, that > > will NOT be considered if that planet is LoD or LoE. > > > > Thanks, > > Cheers !!! > > Ash > > > > > > > > > > --- Prafulla Gang <prafulla.gang@r...> wrote: > > > Hi Donna > > > > > > Bugs are alright, as they are part of software > > > cycle. I am still worried > > > on the formula validity. For example- in lesson 7, > > > the planet in 4th's > > > point to be added for which bindu are less than 4. > > > In your formula, you > > > have considered those planets also, where bindu are > > > equal to 4. At one > > > more place, this more than bindu logic has been not > > > rigidly applied > > > (sheet puts the value for which it is equal to 4 > > > also). > > > > > > Further, point assignment for D and E and planet > > > therein , if you notice > > > - your formula skipped to add 5 points for venus , > > > which is in d/e. (you > > > may note this in my sheet manually done and > > > emailed). > > > > > > Then, for Jupiter aspecting moon (aspect ratio point > > > is missing) and > > > moon aspecting its own sign cancer- you must not > > > deduct any negative > > > points for aspect ratio- ( this is what I > > > interpreted in lesson 7, where > > > in example there venus is excluded for -6 points due > > > to aspected sign > > > being its own sign.) > > > > > > Regards/Prafulla > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Search - Find what you're looking for faster > > http://search. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.