Guest guest Posted January 1, 1980 Report Share Posted January 1, 1980 Dear Sandy, I am giving below the birth details of a person whose married life whose married life is a never ending humiliations from his wife who never mises an oppurtunity to deride him,ridicule him or pick up bitter quarrels with him.He is an Indian and tells me that divorce is an option that is unthinkable for him. Nov 1st 1958,Port Blair,5.14 am,zone +5.30 93E43 11N41 Yes,his Jup is in Libra! I also went through the example charts in one of the SA books on marriage and there about 15 charts with Jup in Libra and and all of them are in very bad relationship level except one.Since SA does not recognise this concept,I thought this is interesting.All the charts are of Indians. You had given a description about the state of relationships in USA in one of the earlier mails.If that is the case,marriage,child birth,etc are all non events and very difficult to be related to Vedic astrology. Regards Kaimal - Sandy Crowther Thursday, March 18, 2004 11:07 AM Ash: Venus/Jupiter findings Dear Ash and Group, Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 17, 2004 Report Share Posted March 17, 2004 Dear Ash and Group, After thinking on this as far as how to most accurately and efficiently accommodate your request, I settled on what would be the easiest and quickest way for me to handle this task. My research was therefore done primarily by looking at several of my databases available on one of my software programs so that I could be certain there were not any duplicate charts involved. (I often enter charts in more than one software program). So I settled (primarily) on SJS (Shri Jyoti Star) for both the research quickness capabilities, and also because in SJS I currently make use of several databases as far as specific charts entered in one place. It is also an easy one step to convert the value at epoch and the annual precession from Lahiri to Krushna's ayanamsa to get the most accurate results for the charts, so I was able to batch check and quickly scroll to double check the data to see what applied to what charts without entering different offsets for each chart - which is what would be required if I also searched my PL6 database - so I didn't thoroughly search that database because of time constraints. And I didn't even open GJ. So keeping all of the above in mind, and also knowing that I didn't look at several other programs where legit data is also available, here are my findings, and I hope they are useful to you... All total, I did look at 1042 charts, of which I disqualified 105 of those charts for various reasons. These are mainly charts of clients, but my database also includes charts of friends, family members, and a few charts are from miscellaneous data that I collected for purposes that interested me - because the facts were revealed about the charts relative to marriage, etc, and therefore good for study purposes using different systems. Anyway, perhaps after this I will work on getting more organized - even though organization is useless when you don't back-up your data, and your hard drive suddenly goes ballistic. (Nothing is permanent - that's the way I really see it. :-) It's late - Hopefully I didn't make any serious errors - mathematical or otherwise. I've invested all the time that I am able to on this project for now, and need to call it a day. So here's what I got... Statistical Breakdown for 1042 Charts : With Relationship Problems: AND Without Relationship Problems: Venus in Krittika: 4% (42 people) 1% (15 people) Venus in Ardra: 3.8% (40 people) 2% (18 people) Venus in Mula: 3% (31 people) 2% (19 people) Jupiter in Libra: 21% (219 people) 6% (63 people) _____________________________ Totals: 32% (rounded off) 332 People 11% or 115 People 332 Problematic Relationships 115 Non-problematic Relationships 447 Charts Met the Criteria above or 43%, with 11% of these charts not bringing expected results. This leaves 595 charts remaining out of 1042; with remainders divided as follows: 332 charts met criteria and HAVE or HAD marital/relationship problems 32% 115 additional charts met criteria but DO NOT have marital/relationship problems 11% 490 charts did NOT meet any of the above criteria, but DO HAVE marital/relationship problems 47% 105 charts were disqualified based on age, sexual preference, lifestyle, etc.. 10% So to sum it up, 79% of Americans in my database have experienced marital infidelity issues or relationship problems. What is important to realize is that ALL these relationships/marriages that have had problems, do not, however, all result in divorce/separation. Some leave, while others stay and try to work things out. Also, for what it's worth, I couldn't help but take note that Venus posited in the other two Nakshatras ruled by the Sun (Uttara Phalguni and Uttarashadha) seemed additionally adverse for promoting sexual monogamy, but I did not track the numbers. Interestingly enough I just heard on Oprah yesterday that 80% of marriages experience some form of cheating and/or infidelity in their marriage...I thought that those stats were high when I heard her say that, but now they do seem relevant in comparison to my findings. ~Namaste~ Sandy Crowther http://www.jupitersweb.com Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 18, 2004 Report Share Posted March 18, 2004 Dear Sandy, Very nice finding. From this I can see other way. 1) The charts where Venus and Jupiter are in perticular position the result is as follows: It means 332 charts were having Criteria given and 74.27% were having Problem. 2) Here there is no effect of Ve and Ju, for 595 Charts. Similarly 595 charts were not having above criteria, but about 82% were having marital problem. Request: Can you check 595 charts, from the WS, if the planets shows less points for 7th house, and there is any link betwwen the points of the WS, and problem in the marital relation. Of course this is a big job. If you can give me some charts, Data only, in my lazor time I will help you. I hope, Ash, Margarita, and other members will also feel happy in helping. So you can send 25 birth datas with the timing event when the problem arised, in personal mail. Or can give on list, so every body will enjoy working It will be a good research work. Once again I must thank you for such a good job. krushna -- In , " Sandy Crowther " <sandy@t...> wrote: > Dear Ash and Group, > > After thinking on this as far as how to most accurately and efficiently > accommodate your request, I settled on what would be the easiest and > quickest way for me to handle this task. My research was therefore done > primarily by looking at several of my databases available on one of my > software programs so that I could be certain there were not any duplicate > charts involved. (I often enter charts in more than one software program). > So I settled (primarily) on SJS (Shri Jyoti Star) for both the research > quickness capabilities, and also because in SJS I currently make use of > several databases as far as specific charts entered in one place. It is also > an easy one step to convert the value at epoch and the annual precession > from Lahiri to Krushna's ayanamsa to get the most accurate results for the > charts, so I was able to batch check and quickly scroll to double check the > data to see what applied to what charts without entering different offsets > for each chart - which is what would be required if I also searched my PL6 > database - so I didn't thoroughly search that database because of time > constraints. And I didn't even open GJ. So keeping all of the above in mind, > and also knowing that I didn't look at several other programs where legit > data is also available, here are my findings, and I hope they are useful to > you... > > All total, I did look at 1042 charts, of which I disqualified 105 of those > charts for various reasons. > > These are mainly charts of clients, but my database also includes charts of > friends, family members, and a few charts are from miscellaneous data that I > collected for purposes that interested me - because the facts were revealed > about the charts relative to marriage, etc, and therefore good for study > purposes using different systems. Anyway, perhaps after this I will work on > getting more organized - even though organization is useless when you don't > back-up your data, and your hard drive suddenly goes ballistic. (Nothing is > permanent - that's the way I really see it. :-) > > It's late - Hopefully I didn't make any serious errors - mathematical or > otherwise. I've invested all the time that I am able to on this project for > now, and need to call it a day. So here's what I got... > > Statistical Breakdown for 1042 Charts : > > With Relationship Problems: AND Without > Relationship Problems: > > Venus in Krittika: 4% (42 people) > 1% (15 people) > Venus in Ardra: 3.8% (40 people) 2% > (18 people) > Venus in Mula: 3% (31 people) 2% > (19 people) > Jupiter in Libra: 21% (219 people) > 6% (63 people) > ____________________ ______ > ___ > Totals: 32% (rounded off) 332 People 11% or > 115 People > > 332 Problematic Relationships > 115 Non-problematic Relationships > 447 Charts Met the Criteria above or 43%, with 11% of these charts not > bringing expected results. > > This leaves 595 charts remaining out of 1042; with remainders divided as > follows: > > 332 charts met criteria and HAVE or HAD marital/relationship problems > 32% > 115 additional charts met criteria but DO NOT have marital/relationship > problems 11% > 490 charts did NOT meet any of the above criteria, but DO HAVE > marital/relationship problems 47% > 105 charts were disqualified based on age, sexual preference, lifestyle, > etc.. 10% > > So to sum it up, 79% of Americans in my database have experienced marital > infidelity issues or relationship problems. What is important to realize is > that ALL these relationships/marriages that have had problems, do not, > however, all result in divorce/separation. Some leave, while others stay and > try to work things out. Also, for what it's worth, I couldn't help but take > note that Venus posited in the other two Nakshatras ruled by the Sun (Uttara > Phalguni and Uttarashadha) seemed additionally adverse for promoting sexual > monogamy, but I did not track the numbers. > > Interestingly enough I just heard on Oprah yesterday that 80% of marriages > experience some form of cheating and/or infidelity in their marriage...I > thought that those stats were high when I heard her say that, but now they > do seem relevant in comparison to my findings. > > > ~Namaste~ > Sandy Crowther > http://www.jupitersweb.com Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 18, 2004 Report Share Posted March 18, 2004 Dear Sandy - Wow! What a great job! Congratulations for a super analysis! You are just too good for the room sometimes! This can also be a great addition to the FAQ section! Donna Dear Ash and Group, After thinking on this as far as how to most accurately and efficiently accommodate your request, I settled on what would be the easiest and quickest way for me to handle this task. My research was therefore done primarily by looking at several of my databases available on one of my software programs so that I could be certain there were not any duplicate charts involved. (I often enter charts in more than one software program). So I settled (primarily) on SJS (Shri Jyoti Star) for both the research quickness capabilities, and also because in SJS I currently make use of several databases as far as specific charts entered in one place. It is also an easy one step to convert the value at epoch and the annual precession from Lahiri to Krushna's ayanamsa to get the most accurate results for the charts, so I was able to batch check and quickly scroll to double check the data to see what applied to what charts without entering different offsets for each chart - which is what would be required if I also searched my PL6 database - so I didn't thoroughly search that database because of time constraints. And I didn't even open GJ. So keeping all of the above in mind, and also knowing that I didn't look at several other programs where legit data is also available, here are my findings, and I hope they are useful to you... All total, I did look at 1042 charts, of which I disqualified 105 of those charts for various reasons. These are mainly charts of clients, but my database also includes charts of friends, family members, and a few charts are from miscellaneous data that I collected for purposes that interested me - because the facts were revealed about the charts relative to marriage, etc, and therefore good for study purposes using different systems. Anyway, perhaps after this I will work on getting more organized - even though organization is useless when you don't back-up your data, and your hard drive suddenly goes ballistic. (Nothing is permanent - that's the way I really see it. :-) It's late - Hopefully I didn't make any serious errors - mathematical or otherwise. I've invested all the time that I am able to on this project for now, and need to call it a day. So here's what I got... Statistical Breakdown for 1042 Charts : With Relationship Problems: AND Without Relationship Problems: Venus in Krittika: 4% (42 people) 1% (15 people) Venus in Ardra: 3.8% (40 people) 2% (18 people) Venus in Mula: 3% (31 people) 2% (19 people) Jupiter in Libra: 21% (219 people) 6% (63 people) _____________________________ Totals: 32% (rounded off) 332 People 11% or 115 People 332 Problematic Relationships 115 Non-problematic Relationships 447 Charts Met the Criteria above or 43%, with 11% of these charts not bringing expected results. This leaves 595 charts remaining out of 1042; with remainders divided as follows: 332 charts met criteria and HAVE or HAD marital/relationship problems 32% 115 additional charts met criteria but DO NOT have marital/relationship problems 11% 490 charts did NOT meet any of the above criteria, but DO HAVE marital/relationship problems 47% 105 charts were disqualified based on age, sexual preference, lifestyle, etc.. 10% So to sum it up, 79% of Americans in my database have experienced marital infidelity issues or relationship problems. What is important to realize is that ALL these relationships/marriages that have had problems, do not, however, all result in divorce/separation. Some leave, while others stay and try to work things out. Also, for what it's worth, I couldn't help but take note that Venus posited in the other two Nakshatras ruled by the Sun (Uttara Phalguni and Uttarashadha) seemed additionally adverse for promoting sexual monogamy, but I did not track the numbers. Interestingly enough I just heard on Oprah yesterday that 80% of marriages experience some form of cheating and/or infidelity in their marriage...I thought that those stats were high when I heard her say that, but now they do seem relevant in comparison to my findings. ~Namaste~ Sandy Crowther http://www.jupitersweb.com Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 18, 2004 Report Share Posted March 18, 2004 Dear Sandy and Krushnaji, Wow... This is amazing job and in such a short period of time... I second Donna in her choice of words... This is the kind of research that is certainly a good candidate for FAQ as it will highlight the importance of such laws. Simply Brilliant !!! Sandy, you have also raised an important observation about Venus in other 2 nakshatra of Sun. There is also a law which we see in Addition to Venus in Krittika, Aadra, Moola. These are 1) Venus in Jayashta (causes multiple relations) 2) Venus gets spoilt IN ALL nakshtras of Sun OF WHICH Krittika is worst. TWO Additional laws also can spell disaster for marriage are 1) Venus to Sun distance < 3deg20. Here persons with such combinations loose their venusian qualities. If such a venus is retrogate then it may have some aditional power. 2) Venus to Sun distance > 43deg20 and if such a venus is aspected by Shani then it enhances the qualities of Venus and aspect of Shani enhances " BAD " qualities of Venus and in addition if Shani aspects Moon or Sun in rasi or navamsa then it destroys venus making it totally out of control. Yes, Sandy, If you can send the charts that Krushnaji has requested I volunteer to help and cast the Worksheets and see the link that Krushnaji had requested in the charts. Thanks once again for this humongous task, Cheers !!! Ash , " Sandy Crowther " <sandy@t...> wrote: > Dear Ash and Group, > > After thinking on this as far as how to most accurately and efficiently > accommodate your request, I settled on what would be the easiest and > quickest way for me to handle this task. My research was therefore done > primarily by looking at several of my databases available on one of my > software programs so that I could be certain there were not any duplicate > charts involved. (I often enter charts in more than one software program). > So I settled (primarily) on SJS (Shri Jyoti Star) for both the research > quickness capabilities, and also because in SJS I currently make use of > several databases as far as specific charts entered in one place. It is also > an easy one step to convert the value at epoch and the annual precession > from Lahiri to Krushna's ayanamsa to get the most accurate results for the > charts, so I was able to batch check and quickly scroll to double check the > data to see what applied to what charts without entering different offsets > for each chart - which is what would be required if I also searched my PL6 > database - so I didn't thoroughly search that database because of time > constraints. And I didn't even open GJ. So keeping all of the above in mind, > and also knowing that I didn't look at several other programs where legit > data is also available, here are my findings, and I hope they are useful to > you... > > All total, I did look at 1042 charts, of which I disqualified 105 of those > charts for various reasons. > > These are mainly charts of clients, but my database also includes charts of > friends, family members, and a few charts are from miscellaneous data that I > collected for purposes that interested me - because the facts were revealed > about the charts relative to marriage, etc, and therefore good for study > purposes using different systems. Anyway, perhaps after this I will work on > getting more organized - even though organization is useless when you don't > back-up your data, and your hard drive suddenly goes ballistic. (Nothing is > permanent - that's the way I really see it. :-) > > It's late - Hopefully I didn't make any serious errors - mathematical or > otherwise. I've invested all the time that I am able to on this project for > now, and need to call it a day. So here's what I got... > > Statistical Breakdown for 1042 Charts : > > With Relationship Problems: AND Without > Relationship Problems: > > Venus in Krittika: 4% (42 people) > 1% (15 people) > Venus in Ardra: 3.8% (40 people) 2% > (18 people) > Venus in Mula: 3% (31 people) 2% > (19 people) > Jupiter in Libra: 21% (219 people) > 6% (63 people) > ____________________ ______ > ___ > Totals: 32% (rounded off) 332 People 11% or > 115 People > > 332 Problematic Relationships > 115 Non-problematic Relationships > 447 Charts Met the Criteria above or 43%, with 11% of these charts not > bringing expected results. > > This leaves 595 charts remaining out of 1042; with remainders divided as > follows: > > 332 charts met criteria and HAVE or HAD marital/relationship problems > 32% > 115 additional charts met criteria but DO NOT have marital/relationship > problems 11% > 490 charts did NOT meet any of the above criteria, but DO HAVE > marital/relationship problems 47% > 105 charts were disqualified based on age, sexual preference, lifestyle, > etc.. 10% > > So to sum it up, 79% of Americans in my database have experienced marital > infidelity issues or relationship problems. What is important to realize is > that ALL these relationships/marriages that have had problems, do not, > however, all result in divorce/separation. Some leave, while others stay and > try to work things out. Also, for what it's worth, I couldn't help but take > note that Venus posited in the other two Nakshatras ruled by the Sun (Uttara > Phalguni and Uttarashadha) seemed additionally adverse for promoting sexual > monogamy, but I did not track the numbers. > > Interestingly enough I just heard on Oprah yesterday that 80% of marriages > experience some form of cheating and/or infidelity in their marriage...I > thought that those stats were high when I heard her say that, but now they > do seem relevant in comparison to my findings. > > > ~Namaste~ > Sandy Crowther > http://www.jupitersweb.com Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 18, 2004 Report Share Posted March 18, 2004 Dear Krushna, Donna, Ash, Kaimal, and Group, Thank you all for your kind words, and thanks Kaimal for the additional data and feedback. Krushna – seeing things from another angle is certainly informative also. Thanks. Now with respect to your request, I will try to get myself more organized over the next several weeks as time permits, and take a second look at some of these remaining charts that did not meet with the criteria, as data is entered in their respective worksheets. My note keeping records have not been great over the years, and although I’m still pretty good at remembering what clients/friends/family members/etc have or had marital problems due to issues of infidelity, I can not be so confident in my abilities to remember the dates that the problems began for a good majority of them. But give me a couple weeks at the very least, and I’ll see what charts I can remember with respect to the time period when the infidelity issues arose, and I’ll work on some of these charts, and send the data of others out in a personal email to you Krushna, or Ash, or anyone who has time – or if I have already received permission from the chart owners in the past – I can post their data to the list. Yes - This is a big job, but could potentially result in some good research, so I’ll give it my best and see what I can do to help. I just need time because I have a lot on my plate right now. Out of state Court battles are requiring me to periodically fly in and out of state – battles involving protection and support issues with respect to my 6 year old grandson - of whom I am his legal permanent guardian, and any issues involving him are always first and foremost on my priority list - above all else in life. Also, I am trying to personally regulate health conditions involving more ‘new and unexpected’ health news that I was just recently made aware of and that I must now address (just when I thought everything was hunky dory health wise – my body begins yet another wild dance – this time with the blood pressure and cholesterol cards acting way up – even when on medication – so go figure. But I am paying attention to this one because my Dad dropped dead instantly in one day with the same identical conditions in place, at the age of 58. I am 55, and therefore must pay attention so I can do astrology for longer than just a few more years before I check out.) J Currently I am also very concerned with the health of my dog and just got back from the vet, as he is experiencing digestive upsets, is dehydrated, and is therefore getting tested medically for several things because he’s only 11 pounds and cannot afford to lose weight. He was given fluids through IV, and now I have to give him Pepcid Ac to reduce acidity. There are currently more conditions and circumstances going on in my life that remove me from doing as much as I want to with respect to all things astrological – but I won’t bore you all any further. So other than also having my mind and hands involved in everything astrological I can think of at my every free moment (my passion in life) J – I don’t have a lot of extra time these days…but things will eventually change – they always do. J So just please bear with me, and hopefully we’ll take it further. Anyway, I should have kept better records and notes throughout the years of collecting the data that I collected, and I regret not having done that. I guess I just never envisioned myself doing any research because I never envisioned what kind of number crunching capacities these software programmers were capable of - with respect to their research capabilities. They are wonderful. But I wish the “Note” boxes were larger on some of the newer Jyotish software programs because that feature really is invaluable. PL6 limits that capacity, and SJS is featured in the entry dialogue box. I wish for ‘unlimited’ note capacity, and an option for showing the note box on the main screen. J Anyway, younger members – please take note of the above, and prepare your database notes for anything you may be doing 30 years down the road. And hard copies of data are certainly a help in the event your hard drive crashes before it has been ghosted. All the Best, Sandy Crowther http://www.jupitersweb.com " krushanain " <krushanain> Thu Mar 18, 2004 6:21 am Re: Ash: Venus/Jupiter findings Dear Sandy, Very nice finding. From this I can see other way. 1) The charts where Venus and Jupiter are in perticular position the result is as follows: It means 332 charts were having Criteria given and 74.27% were having Problem. 2) Here there is no effect of Ve and Ju, for 595 Charts. Similarly 595 charts were not having above criteria, but about 82% were having marital problem. Request: Can you check 595 charts, from the WS, if the planets shows less points for 7th house, and there is any link betwwen the points of the WS, and problem in the marital relation. Of course this is a big job. If you can give me some charts, Data only, in my lazor time I will help you. I hope, Ash, Margarita, and other members will also feel happy in helping. So you can send 25 birth datas with the timing event when the problem arised, in personal mail. Or can give on list, so every body will enjoy working It will be a good research work. Once again I must thank you for such a good job. krushna -- In , " Sandy Crowther " <sandy@t...> wrote: Sandy Crowther [sandy] Thursday, March 18, 2004 12:38 AM To: Subject: Ash: Venus/Jupiter findings Dear Ash and Group, After thinking on this as far as how to most accurately and efficiently accommodate your request, I settled on what would be the easiest and quickest way for me to handle this task. My research was therefore done primarily by looking at several of my databases available on one of my software programs so that I could be certain there were not any duplicate charts involved. (I often enter charts in more than one software program). So I settled (primarily) on SJS (Shri Jyoti Star) for both the research quickness capabilities, and also because in SJS I currently make use of several databases as far as specific charts entered in one place. It is also an easy one step to convert the value at epoch and the annual precession from Lahiri to Krushna's ayanamsa to get the most accurate results for the charts, so I was able to batch check and quickly scroll to double check the data to see what applied to what charts without entering different offsets for each chart - which is what would be required if I also searched my PL6 database - so I didn't thoroughly search that database because of time constraints. And I didn't even open GJ. So keeping all of the above in mind, and also knowing that I didn't look at several other programs where legit data is also available, here are my findings, and I hope they are useful to you... All total, I did look at 1042 charts, of which I disqualified 105 of those charts for various reasons. These are mainly charts of clients, but my database also includes charts of friends, family members, and a few charts are from miscellaneous data that I collected for purposes that interested me - because the facts were revealed about the charts relative to marriage, etc, and therefore good for study purposes using different systems. Anyway, perhaps after this I will work on getting more organized - even though organization is useless when you don't back-up your data, and your hard drive suddenly goes ballistic. (Nothing is permanent - that's the way I really see it. :-) It's late - Hopefully I didn't make any serious errors - mathematical or otherwise. I've invested all the time that I am able to on this project for now, and need to call it a day. So here's what I got... Statistical Breakdown for 1042 Charts : With Relationship Problems: AND Without Relationship Problems: Venus in Krittika: 4% (42 people) 1% (15 people) Venus in Ardra: 3.8% (40 people) 2% (18 people) Venus in Mula: 3% (31 people) 2% (19 people) Jupiter in Libra: 21% (219 people) 6% (63 people) _____________________________ Totals: 32% (rounded off) 332 People 11% or 115 People 332 Problematic Relationships 115 Non-problematic Relationships 447 Charts Met the Criteria above or 43%, with 11% of these charts not bringing expected results. This leaves 595 charts remaining out of 1042; with remainders divided as follows: 332 charts met criteria and HAVE or HAD marital/relationship problems 32% 115 additional charts met criteria but DO NOT have marital/relationship problems 11% 490 charts did NOT meet any of the above criteria, but DO HAVE marital/relationship problems 47% 105 charts were disqualified based on age, sexual preference, lifestyle, etc.. 10% So to sum it up, 79% of Americans in my database have experienced marital infidelity issues or relationship problems. What is important to realize is that ALL these relationships/marriages that have had problems, do not, however, all result in divorce/separation. Some leave, while others stay and try to work things out. Also, for what it's worth, I couldn't help but take note that Venus posited in the other two Nakshatras ruled by the Sun (Uttara Phalguni and Uttarashadha) seemed additionally adverse for promoting sexual monogamy, but I did not track the numbers. Interestingly enough I just heard on Oprah yesterday that 80% of marriages experience some form of cheating and/or infidelity in their marriage...I thought that those stats were high when I heard her say that, but now they do seem relevant in comparison to my findings. ~Namaste~ Sandy Crowther http://www.jupitersweb.com Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 18, 2004 Report Share Posted March 18, 2004 Dear Sandy, What you have done is tremendous!I am only too happy to put in any help to carry it forward.I have an advantage in that I am totally free with plenty of time in hand and a cable connection so that I can be online 24hrs. Regards Kaimal - Sandy Crowther Thursday, March 18, 2004 10:56 PM RE: Ash: Venus/Jupiter findings Dear Krushna, Donna, Ash, Kaimal, and Group, Thank you all for your kind words, and thanks Kaimal for the additional data and feedback. Krushna – seeing things from another angle is certainly informative also. Thanks. Now with respect to your request, I will try to get myself more organized over the next several weeks as time permits, and take a second look at some of these remaining charts that did not meet with the criteria, as data is entered in their respective worksheets. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.