DCs , samdharmi, rectification

[Guest guest]

Dear Krushna, Ash, Anurag, Kaimail and all,

I am very far from being an experienced member, but I think Ash may

be right on this one. Concerning the twins, I haven't noticed any

significant changes with the main DCs (D9, perhaps D6 for disease)

between the two twins, using the Krushna ayanamsha, but it would

seem to be a line to explore. As you say, I hope we get a lesson on

it.

I was looking back in my notes to a message from Krushna on April 7

2001, on the DCs, which may have bearing on current discussion. (As

Krushna makes clear, the nadi changes, as well as representing

change of 150th division, will be almost certainly be reflected in

changes of ascendant in one or other of the lesser divisions of DCs):

" Dear Margarita,

Yes, this system can be applied to all the 16 charts. In 120 minutes

approximately about 150 Nadies are there. When any of the chart from

16

charts changes Nadi changes. The time period is ranging from 8 secs

to

maximum 75 secs aproximatly. For rectifying the Birth time Nadi is

most

important factor. For delicate questions We must refer to indicated

chart.

This system is basically for finding the strength of the planets.

For Rashi chart we apply it for finding the strengths of the planets

for

each house.

By applying it to all the charts and finding the basic strength

only, ( total of A+B+C) and getting cumulative strength of the

planet (total of all the planets for all the houses, Vertical

column) can give hidden strength of the planets. Here we do not

consider the effect of sight or 4:10th relationship. For Dual birth

the difference of time is very less. In such cases, divisional

charts are very useful. Basic Strength of each div. chart can give

the strength for the event indicated by the div. chart.

Calculating the Basic strength of all the charts manually is very

difficult. Now with the help of this computerised program we can

find the

strength of each planet in all the div. charts. These charts can be

used

particularly for finding the strength of the Karak planets (lord of

A) So

we can justify the results.

If the karak planet is getting more then 96 points then it can be

treated as good.

Similarly If we get total for each house by each planets more then

72 points the strength can be treated as good.

For Div. Charts we take only the total of A+B+C = Basic strength.

Only first portion of the worksheet can be used. --- Krushna "

 

This may also give a line of approach for Kaimal's questions

concerning rectification. I've noticed that in the charts of which

I'm most sure of birth time, the DCs seem to give remarkably

consistent results for some key events such as birth of children and

death of parents, results which correspond to and confirm the

results obtained from the rashi chart. This would seem to confirm

the birth times in these cases, as well of course as confirming the

validity of the system.

Krushna makes it clear that if analysing DCs we are only to consider

the first part of the worksheet (basic strength of ABC) and not the

modifications introduced by 4:10 sight or by aspect, as those are

valid only in rashi.

I would very much like to know what Krushna's view is concerning

samdharmi planets when working with DCs.

I presume that natural SDs would still hold good in the DCs, and

probably that the 4:10 SDs would be " carried over " from the D1

rather than being re-calculated for each DC (because the 4:10 part

of worksheet has been rejected by Krushna for working with DCs).

I would be grateful for any confirmation about this from Krushna, if

he has time, and if possible an answer to the following questions

about the other SD rules:

- in DCs, could two planets still be SD if they occupy same original

nakshatra (in rashi, of course)?

- in DCs, could two planets be SD if they occupy same sign in the

DC, or in the original rashi?

- in DCs other than navamsa, would the law of SD for two planets in

same navamsa still hold?

- in DCs other than navamsa, would a planet still be equivalent to

its dispositor in navamsa (or would it perhaps be equivalent to its

dispositor in the DC under examination, or both)?

- Am I right that any 4:10 equivalence is to be taken from the

rashi, not from the DC, and would hold good for all the DCs? If so,

would this " carrying over " from rashi be good even if the SD planet

is lord 6 or lord of 12th from B in DC?

 

Of course ashatakavarga scores would also be involved in some of

these rules, recalculated when appropriate for each DC, now easy

with the WS.

 

Many thanks to Krushna if he has time to answer, or to anyone else

who may have some provisional ideas on these questions.

Graham

 

 

 

, " ashsam73 "

<ashsam73> wrote:

> Dear Anurag,

> I think your question about twins can be made clear with the use

of

> Nadis and DCharts along with Ashtakvarg.

> Since we have not had much experience as we have not as yet

received

> a lesson with the above I shall hold back on my answer.

> Hopefully, others more experienced members on the list may be able

to

> contribute.

> Thanking you,

> Cheers !!!

> Ash

>

> , " Anurag

Agnihotri "

> <agneyastra> wrote:

> > Dear Ash, Margrita and List members,

> >

> > Sometime back I had posted some querries about birth of twins.

> > I had also announced birth of twin boys in the first week of

> Dec. '03.

> >

> > I am giving below birth details of these infant twin brothers :

> >

> > DOB : 3rd Dec. 2003

> > Time : 10:40 am and 10:42 or 10:43 am (born through operation)

> > Place : jaipur (75E52 & 26N55)

> >

> > The elder one was diagnosed jaundice after 3-4 days of his birth.

> > parents who had waited for birth of their children for 11 long

years

> > thought that he has recuperated from jaundice after intensive

> medical

> > treatment only to note that perhaps this child has lost his

hearing

> &

> > speech capacity (perhaps dur to severe jaundice).

> > One can only imagine the plight of parents of these twins.

> >

> > Request you to kindly help in predicting the time for

improvement in

> > this infant's life.

> > Your insightful analysis of the calamity will help us list

members.

> >

> > The younger one who was born only a few minutes later is having

no

> > problems - how can we expalin it ?

> >

> >

> > Looking forward to your kind analysis and advice,

> >

> > With best regards,

> >

> > - Anurag