Guest guest Posted November 6, 2004 Report Share Posted November 6, 2004 Hello all, Please excuse me if this question has recently been answered or seems obvious. I understand the use of karakas (Ld of A, natural and fuctional) to determine the major period when beneficial events related to a particular house are likely to occur (before going into detail with bhuktis, lords of D and E and worksheet points). I would like confirmation that these NKs and FKs can/should also be used to make a static analysis of the chart (e.g. favourable or unfavourable prognostic for children, marriage etc), and for transits. Is it better, for example, to look for benefic/malefic aspects or conjunctions to the karakas (NK or FK) of a house (i.e house B for a given domain), or to consider aspects etc. to the traditional sign ruler of that house? I.e. for Cancer ascendant, to look for a favourable configuration or transit regarding children, would you look at aspects/conjuctions of benefic planets to Mars (ruler of house 5) or to Mercury (FK of 5) and Jupiter (NK of 5)? And if the latter is true (to check primarily the karakas), can the samdharmi of the karaka sometimes require checking instead of the karaka itself? (again, I mean in static or transit analysis - I think I know when to use samdharmi for event triggering by dasha/bhukti). Many thanks for any help, or references to messages where this has been dealt with. Graham Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 6, 2004 Report Share Posted November 6, 2004 Dear Graham and list members, Before going for any result, the status of the karak planets must be checked. If it is powerful, then and then perticular result can be achieved. In any case if it aspects the A,B,or C house then some SD planet can give the result. The Status is judged from the sign, Navmansha it is situated, and planets with it. Thanks and regards krushna Graham Fox <fox.graham wrote: Hello all, Please excuse me if this question has recently been answered or seems obvious.I understand the use of karakas (Ld of A, natural and fuctional) to determine the major period when beneficial events related to a particular house are likely to occur (before going into detail with bhuktis, lords of D and E and worksheet points).I would like confirmation that these NKs and FKs can/should also be used to make a static analysis of the chart (e.g. favourable or unfavourable prognostic for children, marriage etc), and for transits. Is it better, for example, to look for benefic/malefic aspects or conjunctions to the karakas (NK or FK) of a house (i.e house B for a given domain), or to consider aspects etc. to the traditional sign ruler of that house? I.e. for Cancer ascendant, to look for a favourable configuration or transit regarding children, would you look at aspects/conjuctions of benefic planets to Mars(ruler of house 5) or to Mercury (FK of 5) and Jupiter (NK of 5)?And if the latter is true (to check primarily the karakas), can the samdharmi of the karaka sometimes require checking instead of the karaka itself? (again, I mean in static or transit analysis - I think I know when to use samdharmi for event triggering by dasha/bhukti).Many thanks for any help, or references to messages where this has been dealt with.Graham Check out the new Front Page. www. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 7, 2004 Report Share Posted November 7, 2004 Dear Krushna, Many thanks for this speedy, succinct and clear answer. Just one furhter question in response to your answer: if both the karak and its potential samdharmis aspect ABC, would you expect the graha with the fewest overall aspects on ABC to give the result, or would you give priority to the one which doesn't aspect A (or maybe the one which doesn't aspect B)? Thanks again Graham , krushna jugalkalani <krushanain> wrote: > Dear Graham and list members, > Before going for any result, the status of the karak planets must be checked. If it is powerful, then and then perticular result can be achieved. In any case if it aspects the A,B,or C house then some SD planet can give the result. > The Status is judged from the sign, Navmansha it is situated, and planets with it. > Thanks and regards > krushna > > > Graham Fox <fox.graham@w...> wrote: > > Hello all, > Please excuse me if this question has recently been answered or > seems obvious. > I understand the use of karakas (Ld of A, natural and fuctional) to > determine the major period when beneficial events related to a > particular house are likely to occur (before going into detail with > bhuktis, lords of D and E and worksheet points). > I would like confirmation that these NKs and FKs can/should also be > used to make a static analysis of the chart (e.g. favourable or > unfavourable prognostic for children, marriage etc), and for > transits. Is it better, for example, to look for benefic/malefic > aspects or conjunctions to the karakas (NK or FK) of a house (i.e > house B for a given domain), or to consider aspects etc. to the > traditional sign ruler of that house? I.e. for Cancer ascendant, to > look for a favourable configuration or transit regarding children, > would you look at aspects/conjuctions of benefic planets to Mars > (ruler of house 5) or to Mercury (FK of 5) and Jupiter (NK of 5)? > And if the latter is true (to check primarily the karakas), can the > samdharmi of the karaka sometimes require checking instead of the > karaka itself? (again, I mean in static or transit analysis - I > think I know when to use samdharmi for event triggering by > dasha/bhukti). > Many thanks for any help, or references to messages where this has > been dealt with. > Graham > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 7, 2004 Report Share Posted November 7, 2004 Dear Graham, When Karak planet ( lord of house A ) aspects, Then we take Sd to replace this. For SD planet we do not consider the aspect. Yes if more then two planets are SD, in that case we select the planet not aspecting. Regarding the Root strength of the karak planet i will give a lesson. That will be more help ful in selecting the karak. Thanks krushna Graham Fox <fox.graham wrote: Dear Krushna,Many thanks for this speedy, succinct and clear answer. Just one furhter question in response to your answer: if both the karak and its potential samdharmis aspect ABC, would you expect the graha with the fewest overall aspects on ABC to give the result, or would you give priority to the one which doesn't aspect A (or maybe the one which doesn't aspect B)?Thanks againGraham , krushna jugalkalani <krushanain> wrote:> Dear Graham and list members,> Before going for any result, the status of the karak planets must be checked. If it is powerful, then and then perticular result can be achieved. In any case if it aspects the A,B,or C house then some SD planet can give the result. > The Status is judged from the sign, Navmansha it is situated, and planets with it. > Thanks and regards> krushna> > > Graham Fox <fox.graham@w...> wrote:> > Hello all, > Please excuse me if this question has recently been answered or > seems obvious.> I understand the use of karakas (Ld of A, natural and fuctional) to > determine the major period when beneficial events related to a > particular house are likely to occur (before going into detail with > bhuktis, lords of D and E and worksheet points).> I would like confirmation that these NKs and FKs can/should also be > used to make a static analysis of the chart (e.g. favourable or > unfavourable prognostic for children, marriage etc), and for > transits. Is it better, for example, to look for benefic/malefic > aspects or conjunctions to the karakas (NK or FK) of a house (i.e > house B for a given domain), or to consider aspects etc. to the > traditional sign ruler of that house? I.e. for Cancer ascendant, to > look for a favourable configuration or transit regarding children, > would you look at aspects/conjuctions of benefic planets to Mars> (ruler of house 5) or to Mercury (FK of 5) and Jupiter (NK of 5)?> And if the latter is true (to check primarily the karakas), can the > samdharmi of the karaka sometimes require checking instead of the > karaka itself? (again, I mean in static or transit analysis - I > think I know when to use samdharmi for event triggering by > dasha/bhukti).> Many thanks for any help, or references to messages where this has > been dealt with.> Graham > > > > > Sponsor> Eliminate Your Debt!> ·Get out of Debt Now · Christian counselors available·Click here to find out how you can become free from debt.> > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 8, 2004 Report Share Posted November 8, 2004 Dear Krushna, Thank you very much for this clarification, and I very much forward to the future lesson on root strength of karaka. Graham , krushna jugalkalani <krushanain> wrote: > Dear Graham, > When Karak planet ( lord of house A ) aspects, Then we take Sd to replace this. For SD planet we do not consider the aspect. Yes if more then two planets are SD, in that case we select the planet not aspecting. > Regarding the Root strength of the karak planet i will give a lesson. That will be more help ful in selecting the karak. > Thanks > krushna > > > Graham Fox <fox.graham@w...> wrote: > > Dear Krushna, > Many thanks for this speedy, succinct and clear answer. Just one > furhter question in response to your answer: if both the karak and > its potential samdharmis aspect ABC, would you expect the graha with > the fewest overall aspects on ABC to give the result, or would you > give priority to the one which doesn't aspect A (or maybe the one > which doesn't aspect B)? > Thanks again > Graham > > , krushna jugalkalani > <krushanain> wrote: > > Dear Graham and list members, > > Before going for any result, the status of the karak > planets must be checked. If it is powerful, then and then perticular > result can be achieved. In any case if it aspects the A,B,or C house > then some SD planet can give the result. > > The Status is judged from the sign, Navmansha it is > situated, and planets with it. > > Thanks and regards > > krushna > > > > > > Graham Fox <fox.graham@w...> wrote: > > > > Hello all, > > Please excuse me if this question has recently been answered or > > seems obvious. > > I understand the use of karakas (Ld of A, natural and fuctional) > to > > determine the major period when beneficial events related to a > > particular house are likely to occur (before going into detail > with > > bhuktis, lords of D and E and worksheet points). > > I would like confirmation that these NKs and FKs can/should also > be > > used to make a static analysis of the chart (e.g. favourable or > > unfavourable prognostic for children, marriage etc), and for > > transits. Is it better, for example, to look for benefic/malefic > > aspects or conjunctions to the karakas (NK or FK) of a house (i.e > > house B for a given domain), or to consider aspects etc. to the > > traditional sign ruler of that house? I.e. for Cancer ascendant, > to > > look for a favourable configuration or transit regarding children, > > would you look at aspects/conjuctions of benefic planets to Mars > > (ruler of house 5) or to Mercury (FK of 5) and Jupiter (NK of 5)? > > And if the latter is true (to check primarily the karakas), can > the > > samdharmi of the karaka sometimes require checking instead of the > > karaka itself? (again, I mean in static or transit analysis - I > > think I know when to use samdharmi for event triggering by > > dasha/bhukti). > > Many thanks for any help, or references to messages where this has > > been dealt with. > > Graham > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.