Revised points for Symantec

[Guest guest]

Dear Vijay,

 

You had stated earlier to Ash that you were not using Krushna

ayanamsa. So that should explain your discrepency with Bala's

transit results. If you use Lahiri, Saturn retrogrades to gemini on

Jan 13, KAS gives it on Jan 25. I don't have more time to look into

it, but I think that may be the main discrepancy you are facing.

 

Regards,

-Puneet

 

, " childofdevi "

<childofdevi> wrote:

>

> Dear Bala,

>

> So far so good!! I am getting some very different results and

since

> our SAV points per house are the same, one of us could be having

the

> wrong transit information. I will doublecheck my transit data

using

> HoraLite as well(was generated using PL6.0).

>

> In the meantime lets see how it goes.

>

> -Vijay

>

> ps. I assume that you are basing the data on the date of

incorporation

>

>

> , " bsosale "

> <bsosale> wrote:

> >

> > Dear List,

> >

> > Here are the transit points for Symantec from today to end of

Jan

> > 2005.

> >

> > Bala

> >

> > Date Points sa+ju

> > Jan 6th 2005 - 173 points 3

> > Jan 7th 2005 - 173 points 3

> > 10th - 182 pts 3(shuld recover)

> > 11th - 182 pts 3

> > 12th - 184 pts 3

> > 13th - 193 pts 3(shuld recover)

> > 14th - 193 pts 3

> >

> > 17th closed

> > 18th - 179 pts 3(goes down??)

> > 19th - 185 pts 3

> > 20th - 185 pts 3

> > 21st - 185 pts 3

> >

> > 24th - 186 pts 3

> > 25th - 186 pts 3

> > 26th - 187 pts 4

> > 27th - 190 pts 4

> > 28th - 199 pts 4 (Here stocks should be up)

[Guest guest]

Dear Puneet,

 

Thank you very much for this clarification. I think you are right;

Bala had previously pointed this out to me, and I used the SAV sum

with the KAS but Transits with Lahiri. Using the KAS(see below) as a

positive offset from Lahiri, I get the retrograde Sat to Gemini on

Jan 25th.

 

Just one clarification: KAS is less than Lahiri, so we must take a

negative offset from the Lahiri Ayanamsha; this would bring SatR to

Gemini at the end of December??

 

Best wishes,

Vijay

 

ps. Both you and Ash have the same results so I assume we take a

postive offset from Lahiri, but just thought to clarify anyway.

 

 

 

, " Puneet Joshi "

<puneetrph> wrote:

>

> Dear Vijay,

>

> You had stated earlier to Ash that you were not using Krushna

> ayanamsa. So that should explain your discrepency with Bala's

> transit results. If you use Lahiri, Saturn retrogrades to gemini on

> Jan 13, KAS gives it on Jan 25. I don't have more time to look into

> it, but I think that may be the main discrepancy you are facing.

>

> Regards,

> -Puneet

[Guest guest]

Dear Vijay,

 

Yes KAY is less than Lahiri. But retrograde means reverse. Think

about it. Then if you chart it out and compare, you should see the

effect.

 

Regards,

-Puneet

 

, " childofdevi "

<childofdevi> wrote:

>

> Dear Puneet,

>

> Thank you very much for this clarification. I think you are right;

> Bala had previously pointed this out to me, and I used the SAV sum

> with the KAS but Transits with Lahiri. Using the KAS(see below) as

a

> positive offset from Lahiri, I get the retrograde Sat to Gemini on

> Jan 25th.

>

> Just one clarification: KAS is less than Lahiri, so we must take a

> negative offset from the Lahiri Ayanamsha; this would bring SatR

to

> Gemini at the end of December??

>

> Best wishes,

> Vijay

>

> ps. Both you and Ash have the same results so I assume we take a

> postive offset from Lahiri, but just thought to clarify anyway.

>

>

>

> , " Puneet Joshi "

> <puneetrph> wrote:

> >

> > Dear Vijay,

> >

> > You had stated earlier to Ash that you were not using Krushna

> > ayanamsa. So that should explain your discrepency with Bala's

> > transit results. If you use Lahiri, Saturn retrogrades to gemini

on

> > Jan 13, KAS gives it on Jan 25. I don't have more time to look

into

> > it, but I think that may be the main discrepancy you are facing.

> >

> > Regards,

> > -Puneet