Another chart--timing marriage--Ash/Ramesh/Amitabh/all

[Guest guest]

Deat Ash and all,

 

Yes, you are right Ash, I saw that wrong, venus is not with saturn

but mars(not venus). so still more no delay.

 

Now, as Ramesh said, there will be some delay as Satrun

aspects/conjoins A and B (though not C), but theories dont say

that. It has to have relation with all A, B and C or their lords.

 

Ramesh, you have considered house A, B and C in navamsa too, but in

navamsa, the relationship among the planets are judged, not position

or houses.

 

Amitabh, if you consider full delay ( which the chart doesnt show)

then we take 27.5 years of saturn delay in general, but it depends

on the degree of the saturn too. now, if there is a full delay then

of course, what you have predicted is right.

 

he got married on 7th January 1994.

had a baby on 27th november 1994.

 

--Manoshi

, " ashsam73 "

<ashsam73> wrote:

> Dear Manoshi,

>

> How are you getting Ve conjoined Sa in Navamsa.

>

> I am getting Ve Conjoined Mars and Sun in navamsa and in Rasi too ?

>

> I am getting Sa in libra navamsa and Ve in Scorpio.

>

> If Sa and Ve are conjoined then there would be full delay as Sa is

> LoB, Ve is LoC and Sa aspects House A.

>

> I agree with all other points but I am not getting any delay in

this

> chart.

>

> No delay due to Sa as Sa is not touching Venus who is LoC.

>

> Lagna and 9th lords (of Rasi) are in 5:9 in navamsa indicating

> blessings of father and guru.

>

> Ve is with Mars so more chances of affairs. Ma, Sa and Me are

> having some relation i.e. 5th, 7th and 12th lords. Ma and Sa are

> conjoined Rasi and Navamsa and Me is in 7th aspect in Navamsa. So

> again chances of love marriage.

>

> However I am not getting any major delays.

>

> I had timed the marriage in Mercury MD and Ju AD as an early

> marriage.

>

> Now w.r.t job and promotions etc. Some things are not matching

such

> as Venus antra giving good authority but it has less points for

10th

> house.

>

> In any case, I hope to learn from this exercise as all signs of

> early marriage are there in this chart.

>

> Cheers !!!

> Ash

>

>

>

> , " Manoshi

> Chatterjee " <khallopapa> wrote:

> > Dear Ash/Ramesh/all,

> >

> > Here is my analysis...though it doesnt match...

> >

> > Planet Degrees

> > As 10 Cn 5

> > Su 4 Aq 19

> > Mo 10 Pi 26

> > Ma 4 Aq 28

> > Me 15 Cp 39

> > Ju 25 Pi 6

> > Ve 14 Pi 9

> > Sa 3 Aq 16

> > Ra 16 Ge 27

> > Ke 16 Sg 27

> >

> > To look at the delay, lets look at the planet Saturn:

> >

> > Saturn is in 8th house with Sun (LoA) and Mars.

> > Saturn aspects house A in Rasi chart.

> > Saturn is with moon, aspects House B in navamsa.

> > House C or LoC is not affected.

> >

> > SO NO DELAY DUE TO SATURN...is that right?

> >

> > Now, Jupiter is also aspecting Saturn in navamsa chart so It

> should

> > reduce the delay effect....but it's a male chart and lessons say

> > that jupiter delay is judged in female charts only because

jupiter

> > is the karak for child for males...so effect of jupiter I am not

> > judging.

> > Venus is with saturn in navamsa and in lessons it is given that

> (for

> > females), it can cause delay. I am considering it should go for

> the

> > male chart as well as Venus is an important planet for male

> marriage

> > too.

> >

> > Now, there is a 5:9 relationship between 1st and 9th lord in

> > navamsa, in conjunction in rasi chart..so father's blessings,

> > marriage should occur early.

> >

> > I am totally confused...there is no straight forward delay due

to

> > saturn, though association of venus with saturn may cause delay

> BUT

> > father's blessings are there. In reality, marriage takes place

> > pretty late in life, though he was emotionally attached to the

> girl

> > at the age of 25.

> >

> > I was trying to check the job periods.

> >

> > He got his first job, changed jobs in mer/jup and jupiter is SD

to

> > mercury (nakshatra) and Merc is LoD for 6th. so thats fine.

> >

> > his major job change took place in Ve/Ve and venus is the LoE

for

> > 6th house. that matches too. but I was wondering if venus

should

> > give authority, as it has 11 points for 10th house, then to look

> at

> > the SD planets, ( may be I am wrong here and trying to justify

> > events) mercury is SD to venus as Me is in taurus in navamsa and

> > mercury has 22 points for 10th house, so it is giving authority

by

> > relation to mercury....not sure about this.

> >

> > I think I should wait for guidance...

> >

> > --Manoshi

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> > , " Manoshi

> > Chatterjee " <khallopapa> wrote:

> > > Ramesh you are close, but not really, but could you please

tell

> > how

> > > you came to the conclusion, because I am totally lost in this

> > case.

> > > I will disclose the date later and give my attempts too.

> > >

> > > --Manoshi

> > >

> > >

> > > , ramesh mishra

> > > <aarceemastro2002> wrote:

> > > > Dear Ash and Manoshi, Well Wishes,

> > > > I tried to attempt the chart whose DOB is 16 Feb 1964. Pls

> tell

> > me

> > > whether my attempt is correct. The marriage of this chart

might

> > have

> > > taken place during MD of Ketu and AD of Venus in third sector

> i.e.

> > > sometime between Apr 91 to 10-11 Jun 1991.Your feedback may

help

> > me.

> > > > Thanks and best regard.

> > > > Ramesh Mishra

> > > >

> > > > Ash <ashsam73> wrote:

> > > > Dear Manoshi,

> > > > Why wont you do justice to the system? You have done many

> > > analysis very well in the past. Each chart is different and

may

> > > bring up something that you or I do not know or understand or

> > > overlooked.

> > > >

> > > > I guess it will take us decades to do charts like Krushnaji

> does

> > > or reads but till then we must work hard, solve many many

charts

> > > (with proper birth times date etc) and then with practice many

> > > things will get cleared.

> > > >

> > > > Like you, I am also a student. I also make attempts and

dont

> > > worry about the answer if its right or wrong..... I think its

> > better

> > > to make a sincere attempt and make a mistake now and then find

> out

> > > where we went wrong, in that way the next chart we see the

> > previous

> > > experience will help us. If you and I and list members are

> stuck

> > > we can ask Krushnaji to guide us in that way we are lucky.

> > > >

> > > > I shall look forward to your attempt and please do not worry

> > about

> > > other things.

> > > >

> > > > Just as I have learnt from the other charts that you have

> posted

> > I

> > > am eager to learn from this one too.

> > > >

> > > > Cheers !!!

> > > > Ash

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > Manoshi Chatterjee <khallopapa> wrote:

> > > > some events to verify the chart:

> > > >

> > > > joined first job in 1986 later in the year. Change of job

for

> > > > better in 1987 in June-July sometime. No job loss. Changed

> again

> > > in

> > > > 1999 early that year ( got offer in 1998 end) for a big

jump.

> > That

> > > > job gave very good authority, income increase etc. 2003,

> bought

> > a

> > > > house (dont know the month exactly). He has a daughter.

> > > >

> > > > I will give my analysis on this chart too...but I know I

> couldnt

> > > do

> > > > justice to the system.

> > > >

> > > > --Manoshi

> > > >

> > > > , " ashsam73 "

> > > > wrote:

> > > > > Dear Manoshi,

> > > > > I also forgot to add, Please also give some important

events

> > so

> > > > that

> > > > > it will help in chart verifications.

> > > > > Cheers !!!

> > > > > Ash

> > > > >

> > > > > --- In

, " ashsam73 "

> > > > > wrote:

> > > > > > Dear Manoshi,

> > > > > > Also please clearly give the degree positions of the

> planets.

> > > > > > It will help others tally if the planetary positions are

> > > > accurate.

> > > > > > Sometimes we make mistakes in typing AM and PM or in

some

> > > cases

> > > > > > people type 9/8/1950 for example and its never clear if

> its

> > > 9th

> > > > > > August or 8th September etc. Such things can be made

clear

> > if

> > > > > > degree of planets are given.

> > > > > > Thanks,

> > > > > > Cheers !!!

> > > > > > Ash

> > > > > >

> > > > > > , Ash

> > > > >

> > > > > > wrote:

> > > > > > > Dear Manoshi,

> > > > > > > Please give your detailed attempt and all factors you

> > > > considred

> > > > > > along with your mail.

> > > > > > > It will help others learn.

> > > > > > > Thanks,

> > > > > > > Cheers !!!

> > > > > > > Ash

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > Manoshi Chatterjee wrote:

> > > > > > > Here is another chart which I was not able to time

> > marriage

> > > > > > > correctly. Now, this person is a relative of mine and

> Ash

> > > > always

> > > > > > > tells to take the charts of unknown people may be

> because

> > we

> > > > > tend

> > > > > > to

> > > > > > > get biassed. But here I just want to time the marriage.

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > date of birth: 16 feb 1964

> > > > > > > time: 15:40

> > > > > > > place: calcutta

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > time is correct with 3 minutes +/- ( birth certificate)

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > --Manoshi

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > >