Krushna ayanamsha Precession

[Guest guest]

Dear Francois Carriere and all list members, If you are interested in the Rate of precession you may take it as follows The preccession as given to me by Krushnaji is as follows. For year 1900 to 2000 it is 50.96 For year 2000 to 2100 it is 51.00 For year 2100 to 2200 it is 51.05 For year 2200 to 2300 it is 51.08 For year 2300 to 2400 it is 51.14 I hope

information helps you, Cheers !!! AshFRANCOIS CARRIERE <shaula001 wrote: Hello Ash,Thank you again for you kind answer and patience! ;-)I wish to make clear that I do not at all disparage nor do I put in question Krushna's ayanamsha. It has proven to be very efficient. I just wish to understand better. Most softwares I use have the modern way to compute charts and ayanamsha, and they will not work with the way KAY is computed. So I need to do it by hands, at least to get a good approximation of the KAY for a given date (if not available through the worksheet, from 1900 to 2400). One last question on this subject, then:Ash écrivit:[...]> 1) Starting date for Krushnas

Ayanamsa or the date when the split> took place is 24th February 366 AD.>> 2) The value of Krushnas Ayanamsa on 1st January 1900 is 21:33:23.>> You can take it from here and find out how the ayanamsa reached> 21:33:23 in 1900/01/01 from 24th Feb 366 AD when the value was> 0:00:00.If I compute the ayanamsha for the next centuries, i.e. 1900, 2000, 2100, 2200, 2300 and 2400 on january 1st, will I get the correct Krushna ayanamsha? This may help me to understand how to go back to the 0 date of february 24, 366. At least it may help me to understand how the precession rate is processed, since no other software I own can give the same results as the KAS worksheet. That is very annoying.For now I get:1900: 21:33:232000: 22:57:112100: 24:21:012200: 25:44:532300: 27:08:472400: 28:32:43Thank you for your kind patience.-- With my best regards,François

Carrièremailto : shaula001 @ gmail dot commailto : francois dot carriere @ gmail dot com