Query about a very basic point

April 23, 2006

Hello everybody

I was reading through contents on a website and noted that it meantioned

" Bhukti " and " antardasa " separately(i.e.

MD - Bhukti - antardasa

MERC MERC SATN

This confused me. Gosh if Antardasa and bhukti are indeed different then

back to the primary school for me:)

Could somebody comment about the difference between bhukti and antardasa?

regards,

Amitabh.

April 23, 2006

Dear Amitabh,

MD - Bhukti - antardasa

> MERC MERC SATN

It indicates three-level dasa, 1/Maha dasa (Mercury 17 yrs), 2/

Bhukti dasa (Mercury bhukti 2y:4m:27d), 3/ Antara dasa (Saturn

Antara 4m:17d) [4/ fourth level dasa eg Venus pyatandra/sookshma

Me/Me/Sa/Ve 23 days]

Regards,

tw

, " Amitabh Choudhury "

<amitabh.choudhury wrote:

>

> Hello everybody

>

> I was reading through contents on a website and noted that it

meantioned

> " Bhukti " and " antardasa " separately(i.e.

> MD - Bhukti - antardasa

> MERC MERC SATN

>

> This confused me. Gosh if Antardasa and bhukti are indeed

different then

> back to the primary school for me:)

> Could somebody comment about the difference between bhukti and

antardasa?

>

> regards,

> Amitabh.

>

April 23, 2006

Dear Amitabh, TW and List Members,

Its post like these that causes that would cause any Moderator Worry.

This is a KAS list, and as per KAS we do not use levels below MD and

AD. MD = Mahadashsa and AD = Antar Dashsa. Period. After that to

narrow it down we use sectors and then suns transit to narrow it

down to within 13 days of the event.

We also use Krushnas Ayanamsa on this list.

Yes, in a quiz, people are free to use any system, and if their

answer is correct, they maybe requested to explain the method they

have used, thereby respecting all.

At the same time, we all must be cognescant of the fact that this is

a KAS list where the methodology and techniques as taught by

Krushanji can be practiced and learnt.

So please let us stick to KAS on this list. I am sure there are

many who know a myraid of techiques to solve a chart so if u are

learning KAS then by all means u can verify results off list.

Going forward please let us stick to KAS on this list.

Thanks for your co-operation.

Cheers !!!

Ash

(Wearing my Moderator Cap).

, " Amitabh Choudhury "

<amitabh.choudhury wrote:

>

> Hello everybody

>

> I was reading through contents on a website and noted that it

meantioned

> " Bhukti " and " antardasa " separately(i.e.

> MD - Bhukti - antardasa

> MERC MERC SATN

>

> This confused me. Gosh if Antardasa and bhukti are indeed

different then

> back to the primary school for me:)

> Could somebody comment about the difference between bhukti and

antardasa?

>

> regards,

> Amitabh.

>

April 23, 2006

> Its post like these that causes that would cause any Moderator Worry.

Hello Ash

I hadnt hear about antardasa till I started understanding KAS.

Checking through the many posts I came to conclusion that what is termed as

antardasa is same as the term bhukti.

From message of TW I come to understand that the term bhukti has a different

meaning from antardasa.

Do correct me if I am wrong.

>Cheers !!!

>Ash

>(Wearing my Moderator Cap).

By the way, caps and hats keeps the mind cool aint it?

regards,

Amitabh.

On 4/23/06, ashsam73 <ashsam73 wrote:

>

> Dear Amitabh, TW and List Members,

>

> Its post like these that causes that would cause any Moderator Worry.

>

> This is a KAS list, and as per KAS we do not use levels below MD and

> AD. MD = Mahadashsa and AD = Antar Dashsa. Period. After that to

> narrow it down we use sectors and then suns transit to narrow it

> down to within 13 days of the event.

>

> We also use Krushnas Ayanamsa on this list.

>

> Yes, in a quiz, people are free to use any system, and if their

> answer is correct, they maybe requested to explain the method they

> have used, thereby respecting all.

>

> At the same time, we all must be cognescant of the fact that this is

> a KAS list where the methodology and techniques as taught by

> Krushanji can be practiced and learnt.

>

> So please let us stick to KAS on this list. I am sure there are

> many who know a myraid of techiques to solve a chart so if u are

> learning KAS then by all means u can verify results off list.

>

> Going forward please let us stick to KAS on this list.

>

> Thanks for your co-operation.

>

> Cheers !!!

> Ash

> (Wearing my Moderator Cap).

>

> , " Amitabh Choudhury "

> <amitabh.choudhury wrote:

> >

> > Hello everybody

> >

> > I was reading through contents on a website and noted that it

> meantioned

> > " Bhukti " and " antardasa " separately(i.e.

> > MD - Bhukti - antardasa

> > MERC MERC SATN

> >

> > This confused me. Gosh if Antardasa and bhukti are indeed

> different then

> > back to the primary school for me:)

> > Could somebody comment about the difference between bhukti and

> antardasa?

> >

> > regards,

> > Amitabh.

> >

April 23, 2006

Dear Amitabh,

Some schools of astrology call the Pratyantara Dasa (PD or Sub-Sub) as " Antara "

- and they call the Sub Period as " Bhukti " .

However, other schools call the Sub Period (Bhukti) as " Antara " .

Hence this sometimes causes confusion.

In a System that uses 3 (or more) levels of Dasa - be aware that some may call

the Sub-Sub period (PD) as Pratyantara - whereas others will call it Antara. It

is a common area of confusion, but in my opinion neither is " wrong " - it is just

a different way of referring to the Sub-Sub Period.

In a System that uses only 2 levels (e.g. KAS) the point becomes moot, as there

is no 3rd Level of Dasa to consider, as KAS only uses 2 Levels.

Hope this clarifies :-) .

Cheers - Sateesh.

========

, " Amitabh Choudhury "

<amitabh.choudhury wrote:

>

> Hello everybody

>

> I was reading through contents on a website and noted that it

meantioned

> " Bhukti " and " antardasa " separately(i.e.

> MD - Bhukti - antardasa

> MERC MERC SATN

>

> This confused me. Gosh if Antardasa and bhukti are indeed

different then

> back to the primary school for me:)

> Could somebody comment about the difference between bhukti and

antardasa?

>

> regards,

> Amitabh.

April 23, 2006

Dear Ash,

I'm very sorry for causing you worry by explaining sub-sub division

of Vimsottari Dasa (Parasara's key to prognostication) according the

inventor's allocation of years to each planet as follows:

Out of total 120 years shares are given 6y to Sun, 10y Moon, 7y

Mars, 18y Rahu, 16y Jupiter, 19y Sturn, 17y Mercury, 7y Ketu and 20y

to Venus. These shares hold the same propotion in all periods, Dasha,

Bhukti, Anthara, Sookshama and so on (B. SURYANARAIN RAO, see note

below), giving Bhukti= Dasha period (Bhukti /120); Anthara= D (B/120)

(Anthara /120); Sukshama= D (B/120) (A/120) (Sukshama/120) and so

on, e.g.. Venus Dasa/ Saturn Bhukti= 20 (19/120)= 3.166667= 3y +

0.166667x12=3y:2m; Venus Dasa/ Satrun Bhukti/Jupiter Anthara= 20

(19/120)(16/120)= 0.422222y= 0.422222x12= 5m:0.066666x30d= 5m:2d;

Ven/Jup/Rahu/ Sat= 20(16/120)(18/120)(19/120)= 0.063333yx 12x30= 23d;

Mer/Ven/Sat/Jup/Mer= 17(20/120)(19/120)(16/120)(17/120)=

0.0084737yx12x30= 3d or up to 6th level Mer/Ven/Sat/Jup/Mer/ Rah=

0.0084737(18/120)x12x30= 11 hours and so on. This simple rathematics

will give the same durations of Bhukti, Anthara, Sukshama and so on

in any dasa duration table, KSK Readers, KP Emphemeris, Lahiri

Emphemeris, KAS SW, any astrology text book of J. N. Bhasin, James

T. Braha, David Frawley, Hart de Foue & Robert Svoboda, B.V. Raman,

All India Astrological Services etc. If anything different from this

simple calculations, there is an error for correction not for

discussion. In other words, all tables should be the same.

Note: Suryanarain Rao: Strijataka or Female Horoscopy, 1964, p 154

http://www.sulekha.com/content/epress/samples/EB_RAMAN_015_S.pdf

Regards,

tw

, " ashsam73 "

<ashsam73 wrote:

>

> Dear Amitabh, TW and List Members,

>

> Its post like these that causes that would cause any Moderator

Worry.

>

> This is a KAS list, and as per KAS we do not use levels below MD

and

> AD. MD = Mahadashsa and AD = Antar Dashsa. Period. After that

to

> narrow it down we use sectors and then suns transit to narrow it

> down to within 13 days of the event.

>

> We also use Krushnas Ayanamsa on this list.

>

> Yes, in a quiz, people are free to use any system, and if their

> answer is correct, they maybe requested to explain the method they

> have used, thereby respecting all.

>

> At the same time, we all must be cognescant of the fact that this

is

> a KAS list where the methodology and techniques as taught by

> Krushanji can be practiced and learnt.

>

> So please let us stick to KAS on this list. I am sure there are

> many who know a myraid of techiques to solve a chart so if u are

> learning KAS then by all means u can verify results off list.

>

> Going forward please let us stick to KAS on this list.

>

> Thanks for your co-operation.

>

> Cheers !!!

> Ash

> (Wearing my Moderator Cap).

>

> , " Amitabh

Choudhury "

> <amitabh.choudhury@> wrote:

> >

> > Hello everybody

> >

> > I was reading through contents on a website and noted that it

> meantioned

> > " Bhukti " and " antardasa " separately(i.e.

> > MD - Bhukti - antardasa

> > MERC MERC SATN

> >

> > This confused me. Gosh if Antardasa and bhukti are indeed

> different then

> > back to the primary school for me:)

> > Could somebody comment about the difference between bhukti and

> antardasa?

> >

> > regards,

> > Amitabh.

> >

April 23, 2006

Dear TW,

I do not understand a simple fact. We do not use sub-sub divisions

or sub-sub-sub divisions or even upto a level that gives in hours.

We also do not use KP Ayanansa or Lahiri here. We are using

Krushnas Ayanamsa only. This is part and parcel of this system.

Sub-Sub, or Sub-Sub-Sub etc are not used in KAS. We are using MD

and AD and calculations of that u can get from Lesson 9.

http://krushna.sageasita.com/pdf/lesson09.pdf

As per KAS we are timing events using the following.

1) Vinshottari dashsa and only 2 Levels. MD = Mahadasha and AD =

antar dashsa. (This is what we call it here).

2) Once we find the antar dashsa to narrow it we divide the antra

(AD) into 3 equal sectors.

3) We then find in which sectors the event will fall in.

4) After finding the proper sector, we then narrow the event down to

within 13 days using Suns transit over powerful planets as per the

WS (Ashtakvarg power)

From this you can clearly see, that there is no sub-sub or sub-sub-

sub etc.

Such things might be used by other schools of Jyotish Shastra which

is fine as per their systems.

This list has been created by Krushaji so that KAS can be brought

forward to world and here KAS learners can learn KAS and how to time

events using this unique technique.

There are many system, schools of thoughts and many different

approaches and systems and all systems are good and I am sure if

used properly using any systems one can time events perfectly.

Here on this list, please let us stick to KAS for benefit for

members so that such confusions do not arise.

I hope you understand.

Thank you for your co-operation.

Cheers !!!

Ash

, " tw853 " <tw853

wrote:

>

> Dear Ash,

>

> I'm very sorry for causing you worry by explaining sub-sub

division

> of Vimsottari Dasa (Parasara's key to prognostication) according

the

> inventor's allocation of years to each planet as follows:

>

> Out of total 120 years shares are given 6y to Sun, 10y Moon, 7y

> Mars, 18y Rahu, 16y Jupiter, 19y Sturn, 17y Mercury, 7y Ketu and

20y

> to Venus. These shares hold the same propotion in all periods,

Dasha,

> Bhukti, Anthara, Sookshama and so on (B. SURYANARAIN RAO, see note

> below), giving Bhukti= Dasha period (Bhukti /120); Anthara= D

(B/120)

> (Anthara /120); Sukshama= D (B/120) (A/120) (Sukshama/120) and so

> on, e.g.. Venus Dasa/ Saturn Bhukti= 20 (19/120)= 3.166667= 3y +

> 0.166667x12=3y:2m; Venus Dasa/ Satrun Bhukti/Jupiter Anthara= 20

> (19/120)(16/120)= 0.422222y= 0.422222x12= 5m:0.066666x30d= 5m:2d;

> Ven/Jup/Rahu/ Sat= 20(16/120)(18/120)(19/120)= 0.063333yx 12x30=

23d;

> Mer/Ven/Sat/Jup/Mer= 17(20/120)(19/120)(16/120)(17/120)=

> 0.0084737yx12x30= 3d or up to 6th level Mer/Ven/Sat/Jup/Mer/ Rah=

> 0.0084737(18/120)x12x30= 11 hours and so on. This simple

rathematics

> will give the same durations of Bhukti, Anthara, Sukshama and so on

> in any dasa duration table, KSK Readers, KP Emphemeris, Lahiri

> Emphemeris, KAS SW, any astrology text book of J. N. Bhasin,

James

> T. Braha, David Frawley, Hart de Foue & Robert Svoboda, B.V.

Raman,

> All India Astrological Services etc. If anything different from

this

> simple calculations, there is an error for correction not for

> discussion. In other words, all tables should be the same.

>

> Note: Suryanarain Rao: Strijataka or Female Horoscopy, 1964, p 154

>

> http://www.sulekha.com/content/epress/samples/EB_RAMAN_015_S.pdf

>

> Regards,

>

> tw

>

> , " ashsam73 "

> <ashsam73@> wrote:

> >

> > Dear Amitabh, TW and List Members,

> >

> > Its post like these that causes that would cause any Moderator

> Worry.

> >

> > This is a KAS list, and as per KAS we do not use levels below MD

> and

> > AD. MD = Mahadashsa and AD = Antar Dashsa. Period. After that

> to

> > narrow it down we use sectors and then suns transit to narrow it

> > down to within 13 days of the event.

> >

> > We also use Krushnas Ayanamsa on this list.

> >

> > Yes, in a quiz, people are free to use any system, and if their

> > answer is correct, they maybe requested to explain the method

they

> > have used, thereby respecting all.

> >

> > At the same time, we all must be cognescant of the fact that

this

> is

> > a KAS list where the methodology and techniques as taught by

> > Krushanji can be practiced and learnt.

> >

> > So please let us stick to KAS on this list. I am sure there are

> > many who know a myraid of techiques to solve a chart so if u are

> > learning KAS then by all means u can verify results off list.

> >

> > Going forward please let us stick to KAS on this list.

> >

> > Thanks for your co-operation.

> >

> > Cheers !!!

> > Ash

> > (Wearing my Moderator Cap).

> >

> > , " Amitabh

> Choudhury "

> > <amitabh.choudhury@> wrote:

> > >

> > > Hello everybody

> > >

> > > I was reading through contents on a website and noted that it

> > meantioned

> > > " Bhukti " and " antardasa " separately(i.e.

> > > MD - Bhukti - antardasa

> > > MERC MERC SATN

> > >

> > > This confused me. Gosh if Antardasa and bhukti are indeed

> > different then

> > > back to the primary school for me:)

> > > Could somebody comment about the difference between bhukti and

> > antardasa?

> > >

> > > regards,

> > > Amitabh.

> > >

April 23, 2006

Dear Ash,

There is only and the only one Vimsottari Dasa prevented by

Parasara, Father Hindu Predictive astrology, which can not be a

monopoly by any school of thought. It is and can be devided to sub

divivision as much as desired. You're using sub as per Prasara and

sub-sub as per your own way of devision. I am not advocating to use

standard sub-sub division in this forum. What I am saying is about

original division of Prasara's Vimsottari Dasa but not making

confusion as you are saying.

Regards,

tw

, " ashsam73 "

<ashsam73 wrote:

>

> Dear TW,

>

> I do not understand a simple fact. We do not use sub-sub

divisions

> or sub-sub-sub divisions or even upto a level that gives in

hours.

> We also do not use KP Ayanansa or Lahiri here. We are using

> Krushnas Ayanamsa only. This is part and parcel of this system.

>

> Sub-Sub, or Sub-Sub-Sub etc are not used in KAS. We are using MD

> and AD and calculations of that u can get from Lesson 9.

>

> http://krushna.sageasita.com/pdf/lesson09.pdf

>

> As per KAS we are timing events using the following.

>

> 1) Vinshottari dashsa and only 2 Levels. MD = Mahadasha and AD =

> antar dashsa. (This is what we call it here).

>

> 2) Once we find the antar dashsa to narrow it we divide the antra

> (AD) into 3 equal sectors.

>

> 3) We then find in which sectors the event will fall in.

>

> 4) After finding the proper sector, we then narrow the event down

to

> within 13 days using Suns transit over powerful planets as per the

> WS (Ashtakvarg power)

>

> From this you can clearly see, that there is no sub-sub or sub-sub-

> sub etc.

>

> Such things might be used by other schools of Jyotish Shastra

which

> is fine as per their systems.

>

> This list has been created by Krushaji so that KAS can be brought

> forward to world and here KAS learners can learn KAS and how to

time

> events using this unique technique.

>

> There are many system, schools of thoughts and many different

> approaches and systems and all systems are good and I am sure if

> used properly using any systems one can time events perfectly.

>

> Here on this list, please let us stick to KAS for benefit for

> members so that such confusions do not arise.

>

> I hope you understand.

>

> Thank you for your co-operation.

> Cheers !!!

> Ash

>

> , " tw853 " <tw853@>

> wrote:

> >

> > Dear Ash,

> >

> > I'm very sorry for causing you worry by explaining sub-sub

> division

> > of Vimsottari Dasa (Parasara's key to prognostication) according

> the

> > inventor's allocation of years to each planet as follows:

> >

> > Out of total 120 years shares are given 6y to Sun, 10y Moon, 7y

> > Mars, 18y Rahu, 16y Jupiter, 19y Sturn, 17y Mercury, 7y Ketu and

> 20y

> > to Venus. These shares hold the same propotion in all periods,

> Dasha,

> > Bhukti, Anthara, Sookshama and so on (B. SURYANARAIN RAO, see

note

> > below), giving Bhukti= Dasha period (Bhukti /120); Anthara= D

> (B/120)

> > (Anthara /120); Sukshama= D (B/120) (A/120) (Sukshama/120) and

so

> > on, e.g.. Venus Dasa/ Saturn Bhukti= 20 (19/120)= 3.166667= 3y +

> > 0.166667x12=3y:2m; Venus Dasa/ Satrun Bhukti/Jupiter Anthara= 20

> > (19/120)(16/120)= 0.422222y= 0.422222x12= 5m:0.066666x30d= 5m:2d;

> > Ven/Jup/Rahu/ Sat= 20(16/120)(18/120)(19/120)= 0.063333yx 12x30=

> 23d;

> > Mer/Ven/Sat/Jup/Mer= 17(20/120)(19/120)(16/120)(17/120)=

> > 0.0084737yx12x30= 3d or up to 6th level Mer/Ven/Sat/Jup/Mer/ Rah=

> > 0.0084737(18/120)x12x30= 11 hours and so on. This simple

> rathematics

> > will give the same durations of Bhukti, Anthara, Sukshama and so

on

> > in any dasa duration table, KSK Readers, KP Emphemeris, Lahiri

> > Emphemeris, KAS SW, any astrology text book of J. N. Bhasin,

> James

> > T. Braha, David Frawley, Hart de Foue & Robert Svoboda, B.V.

> Raman,

> > All India Astrological Services etc. If anything different from

> this

> > simple calculations, there is an error for correction not for

> > discussion. In other words, all tables should be the same.

> >

> > Note: Suryanarain Rao: Strijataka or Female Horoscopy, 1964, p

154

> >

> > http://www.sulekha.com/content/epress/samples/EB_RAMAN_015_S.pdf

> >

> > Regards,

> >

> > tw

> >

> > , " ashsam73 "

> > <ashsam73@> wrote:

> > >

> > > Dear Amitabh, TW and List Members,

> > >

> > > Its post like these that causes that would cause any Moderator

> > Worry.

> > >

> > > This is a KAS list, and as per KAS we do not use levels below

MD

> > and

> > > AD. MD = Mahadashsa and AD = Antar Dashsa. Period. After

that

> > to

> > > narrow it down we use sectors and then suns transit to narrow

it

> > > down to within 13 days of the event.

> > >

> > > We also use Krushnas Ayanamsa on this list.

> > >

> > > Yes, in a quiz, people are free to use any system, and if

their

> > > answer is correct, they maybe requested to explain the method

> they

> > > have used, thereby respecting all.

> > >

> > > At the same time, we all must be cognescant of the fact that

> this

> > is

> > > a KAS list where the methodology and techniques as taught by

> > > Krushanji can be practiced and learnt.

> > >

> > > So please let us stick to KAS on this list. I am sure there

are

> > > many who know a myraid of techiques to solve a chart so if u

are

> > > learning KAS then by all means u can verify results off list.

> > >

> > > Going forward please let us stick to KAS on this list.

> > >

> > > Thanks for your co-operation.

> > >

> > > Cheers !!!

> > > Ash

> > > (Wearing my Moderator Cap).

> > >

> > > , " Amitabh

> > Choudhury "

> > > <amitabh.choudhury@> wrote:

> > > >

> > > > Hello everybody

> > > >

> > > > I was reading through contents on a website and noted that

it

> > > meantioned

> > > > " Bhukti " and " antardasa " separately(i.e.

> > > > MD - Bhukti - antardasa

> > > > MERC MERC SATN

> > > >

> > > > This confused me. Gosh if Antardasa and bhukti are indeed

> > > different then

> > > > back to the primary school for me:)

> > > > Could somebody comment about the difference between bhukti

and

> > > antardasa?

> > > >

> > > > regards,

> > > > Amitabh.

> > > >

April 23, 2006

Dear TW,

I am sure you must be aware that there are school of thought that use

Vinshottari dashsa starting from Sun, From moon, from lagna etc etc etc.

As per KAS we are using Vinshottari dashsa starting only from Moon.

I hope its clear.

I hope its also clear that we are not using sub-sub divisions and the naming

conventions that we are using here on this list.

Going forward that will not be a confusion.

Yes, one more thing, here we are using the BAV definition as given by

Varhararmira and not Parasara.

My only point is that lets stick to KAS and its technique here on this list so

that there are no confusions.

Cheers !!!

Ash

tw853 <tw853 wrote:

Dear Ash,

There is only and the only one Vimsottari Dasa prevented by

Parasara, Father Hindu Predictive astrology, which can not be a

monopoly by any school of thought. It is and can be devided to sub

divivision as much as desired. You're using sub as per Prasara and

sub-sub as per your own way of devision. I am not advocating to use

standard sub-sub division in this forum. What I am saying is about

original division of Prasara's Vimsottari Dasa but not making

confusion as you are saying.

Regards,

tw

, " ashsam73 "

wrote:

>

> Dear TW,

>

> I do not understand a simple fact. We do not use sub-sub

divisions

> or sub-sub-sub divisions or even upto a level that gives in

hours.

> We also do not use KP Ayanansa or Lahiri here. We are using

> Krushnas Ayanamsa only. This is part and parcel of this system.

>

> Sub-Sub, or Sub-Sub-Sub etc are not used in KAS. We are using MD

> and AD and calculations of that u can get from Lesson 9.

>

> http://krushna.sageasita.com/pdf/lesson09.pdf

>

> As per KAS we are timing events using the following.

>

> 1) Vinshottari dashsa and only 2 Levels. MD = Mahadasha and AD =

> antar dashsa. (This is what we call it here).

>

> 2) Once we find the antar dashsa to narrow it we divide the antra

> (AD) into 3 equal sectors.

>

> 3) We then find in which sectors the event will fall in.

>

> 4) After finding the proper sector, we then narrow the event down

to

> within 13 days using Suns transit over powerful planets as per the

> WS (Ashtakvarg power)

>

> From this you can clearly see, that there is no sub-sub or sub-sub-

> sub etc.

>

> Such things might be used by other schools of Jyotish Shastra

which

> is fine as per their systems.

>

> This list has been created by Krushaji so that KAS can be brought

> forward to world and here KAS learners can learn KAS and how to

time

> events using this unique technique.

>

> There are many system, schools of thoughts and many different

> approaches and systems and all systems are good and I am sure if

> used properly using any systems one can time events perfectly.

>

> Here on this list, please let us stick to KAS for benefit for

> members so that such confusions do not arise.

>

> I hope you understand.

>

> Thank you for your co-operation.

> Cheers !!!

> Ash

>

> , " tw853 "

> wrote:

> >

> > Dear Ash,

> >

> > I'm very sorry for causing you worry by explaining sub-sub

> division

> > of Vimsottari Dasa (Parasara's key to prognostication) according

> the

> > inventor's allocation of years to each planet as follows:

> >

> > Out of total 120 years shares are given 6y to Sun, 10y Moon, 7y

> > Mars, 18y Rahu, 16y Jupiter, 19y Sturn, 17y Mercury, 7y Ketu and

> 20y

> > to Venus. These shares hold the same propotion in all periods,

> Dasha,

> > Bhukti, Anthara, Sookshama and so on (B. SURYANARAIN RAO, see

note

> > below), giving Bhukti= Dasha period (Bhukti /120); Anthara= D

> (B/120)

> > (Anthara /120); Sukshama= D (B/120) (A/120) (Sukshama/120) and

so

> > on, e.g.. Venus Dasa/ Saturn Bhukti= 20 (19/120)= 3.166667= 3y +

> > 0.166667x12=3y:2m; Venus Dasa/ Satrun Bhukti/Jupiter Anthara= 20

> > (19/120)(16/120)= 0.422222y= 0.422222x12= 5m:0.066666x30d= 5m:2d;

> > Ven/Jup/Rahu/ Sat= 20(16/120)(18/120)(19/120)= 0.063333yx 12x30=

> 23d;

> > Mer/Ven/Sat/Jup/Mer= 17(20/120)(19/120)(16/120)(17/120)=

> > 0.0084737yx12x30= 3d or up to 6th level Mer/Ven/Sat/Jup/Mer/ Rah=

> > 0.0084737(18/120)x12x30= 11 hours and so on. This simple

> rathematics

> > will give the same durations of Bhukti, Anthara, Sukshama and so

on

> > in any dasa duration table, KSK Readers, KP Emphemeris, Lahiri

> > Emphemeris, KAS SW, any astrology text book of J. N. Bhasin,

> James

> > T. Braha, David Frawley, Hart de Foue & Robert Svoboda, B.V.

> Raman,

> > All India Astrological Services etc. If anything different from

> this

> > simple calculations, there is an error for correction not for

> > discussion. In other words, all tables should be the same.

> >

> > Note: Suryanarain Rao: Strijataka or Female Horoscopy, 1964, p

154

> >

> > http://www.sulekha.com/content/epress/samples/EB_RAMAN_015_S.pdf

> >

> > Regards,

> >

> > tw

> >

> > , " ashsam73 "

> > wrote:

> > >

> > > Dear Amitabh, TW and List Members,

> > >

> > > Its post like these that causes that would cause any Moderator

> > Worry.

> > >

> > > This is a KAS list, and as per KAS we do not use levels below

MD

> > and

> > > AD. MD = Mahadashsa and AD = Antar Dashsa. Period. After

that

> > to

> > > narrow it down we use sectors and then suns transit to narrow

it

> > > down to within 13 days of the event.

> > >

> > > We also use Krushnas Ayanamsa on this list.

> > >

> > > Yes, in a quiz, people are free to use any system, and if

their

> > > answer is correct, they maybe requested to explain the method

> they

> > > have used, thereby respecting all.

> > >

> > > At the same time, we all must be cognescant of the fact that

> this

> > is

> > > a KAS list where the methodology and techniques as taught by

> > > Krushanji can be practiced and learnt.

> > >

> > > So please let us stick to KAS on this list. I am sure there

are

> > > many who know a myraid of techiques to solve a chart so if u

are

> > > learning KAS then by all means u can verify results off list.

> > >

> > > Going forward please let us stick to KAS on this list.

> > >

> > > Thanks for your co-operation.

> > >

> > > Cheers !!!

> > > Ash

> > > (Wearing my Moderator Cap).

> > >

> > > , " Amitabh

> > Choudhury "

> > > wrote:

> > > >

> > > > Hello everybody

> > > >

> > > > I was reading through contents on a website and noted that

it

> > > meantioned

> > > > " Bhukti " and " antardasa " separately(i.e.

> > > > MD - Bhukti - antardasa

> > > > MERC MERC SATN

> > > >

> > > > This confused me. Gosh if Antardasa and bhukti are indeed

> > > different then

> > > > back to the primary school for me:)

> > > > Could somebody comment about the difference between bhukti

and

> > > antardasa?

> > > >

> > > > regards,

> > > > Amitabh.

> > > >

April 23, 2006

, Ash <ashsam73

wrote:

>

> Dear TW,

>

> I am sure you must be aware that there are school of thought

that use Vinshottari dashsa starting from Sun, From moon, from lagna

etc etc etc.

>

> As per KAS we are using Vinshottari dashsa starting only from

Moon.

>

> I hope its clear.

>

> I hope its also clear that we are not using sub-sub divisions

and the naming conventions that we are using here on this list.

>

> Going forward that will not be a confusion.

>

> Yes, one more thing, here we are using the BAV definition as

given by Varhararmira and not Parasara.

>

> My only point is that lets stick to KAS and its technique here

on this list so that there are no confusions.

>

> Cheers !!!

> Ash

>

> tw853 <tw853 wrote:

> Dear Ash,

>

> There is only and the only one Vimsottari Dasa prevented by

> Parasara, Father Hindu Predictive astrology, which can not be a

> monopoly by any school of thought. It is and can be devided to sub

> divivision as much as desired. You're using sub as per Prasara and

> sub-sub as per your own way of devision. I am not advocating to

use

> standard sub-sub division in this forum. What I am saying is about

> original division of Prasara's Vimsottari Dasa but not making

> confusion as you are saying.

>

> Regards,

>

> tw

>

> , " ashsam73 "

> wrote:

> >

> > Dear TW,

> >

> > I do not understand a simple fact. We do not use sub-sub

> divisions

> > or sub-sub-sub divisions or even upto a level that gives in

> hours.

> > We also do not use KP Ayanansa or Lahiri here. We are using

> > Krushnas Ayanamsa only. This is part and parcel of this system.

> >

> > Sub-Sub, or Sub-Sub-Sub etc are not used in KAS. We are using MD

> > and AD and calculations of that u can get from Lesson 9.

> >

> > http://krushna.sageasita.com/pdf/lesson09.pdf

> >

> > As per KAS we are timing events using the following.

> >

> > 1) Vinshottari dashsa and only 2 Levels. MD = Mahadasha and AD =

> > antar dashsa. (This is what we call it here).

> >

> > 2) Once we find the antar dashsa to narrow it we divide the

antra

> > (AD) into 3 equal sectors.

> >

> > 3) We then find in which sectors the event will fall in.

> >

> > 4) After finding the proper sector, we then narrow the event

down

> to

> > within 13 days using Suns transit over powerful planets as per

the

> > WS (Ashtakvarg power)

> >

> > From this you can clearly see, that there is no sub-sub or sub-

sub-

> > sub etc.

> >

> > Such things might be used by other schools of Jyotish Shastra

> which

> > is fine as per their systems.

> >

> > This list has been created by Krushaji so that KAS can be

brought

> > forward to world and here KAS learners can learn KAS and how to

> time

> > events using this unique technique.

> >

> > There are many system, schools of thoughts and many different

> > approaches and systems and all systems are good and I am sure if

> > used properly using any systems one can time events perfectly.

> >

> > Here on this list, please let us stick to KAS for benefit for

> > members so that such confusions do not arise.

> >

> > I hope you understand.

> >

> > Thank you for your co-operation.

> > Cheers !!!

> > Ash

> >

> > , " tw853 "

> > wrote:

> > >

> > > Dear Ash,

> > >

> > > I'm very sorry for causing you worry by explaining sub-sub

> > division

> > > of Vimsottari Dasa (Parasara's key to prognostication)

according

> > the

> > > inventor's allocation of years to each planet as follows:

> > >

> > > Out of total 120 years shares are given 6y to Sun, 10y Moon, 7y

> > > Mars, 18y Rahu, 16y Jupiter, 19y Sturn, 17y Mercury, 7y Ketu

and

> > 20y

> > > to Venus. These shares hold the same propotion in all periods,

> > Dasha,

> > > Bhukti, Anthara, Sookshama and so on (B. SURYANARAIN RAO, see

> note

> > > below), giving Bhukti= Dasha period (Bhukti /120); Anthara= D

> > (B/120)

> > > (Anthara /120); Sukshama= D (B/120) (A/120) (Sukshama/120) and

> so

> > > on, e.g.. Venus Dasa/ Saturn Bhukti= 20 (19/120)= 3.166667= 3y

+

> > > 0.166667x12=3y:2m; Venus Dasa/ Satrun Bhukti/Jupiter Anthara=

20

> > > (19/120)(16/120)= 0.422222y= 0.422222x12= 5m:0.066666x30d=

5m:2d;

> > > Ven/Jup/Rahu/ Sat= 20(16/120)(18/120)(19/120)= 0.063333yx

12x30=

> > 23d;

> > > Mer/Ven/Sat/Jup/Mer= 17(20/120)(19/120)(16/120)(17/120)=

> > > 0.0084737yx12x30= 3d or up to 6th level Mer/Ven/Sat/Jup/Mer/

Rah=

> > > 0.0084737(18/120)x12x30= 11 hours and so on. This simple

> > rathematics

> > > will give the same durations of Bhukti, Anthara, Sukshama and

so

> on

> > > in any dasa duration table, KSK Readers, KP Emphemeris, Lahiri

> > > Emphemeris, KAS SW, any astrology text book of J. N. Bhasin,

> > James

> > > T. Braha, David Frawley, Hart de Foue & Robert Svoboda, B.V.

> > Raman,

> > > All India Astrological Services etc. If anything different

from

> > this

> > > simple calculations, there is an error for correction not for

> > > discussion. In other words, all tables should be the same.

> > >

> > > Note: Suryanarain Rao: Strijataka or Female Horoscopy, 1964, p

> 154

> > >

http://www.sulekha.com/content/epress/samples/EB_RAMAN_015_S.pdf

> > >

> > > Regards,

> > >

> > > tw

> > >

> > > , " ashsam73 "

> > > wrote:

> > > >

> > > > Dear Amitabh, TW and List Members,

> > > >

> > > > Its post like these that causes that would cause any

Moderator

> > > Worry.

> > > >

> > > > This is a KAS list, and as per KAS we do not use levels

below

> MD

> > > and

> > > > AD. MD = Mahadashsa and AD = Antar Dashsa. Period. After

> that

> > > to

> > > > narrow it down we use sectors and then suns transit to

narrow

> it

> > > > down to within 13 days of the event.

> > > >

> > > > We also use Krushnas Ayanamsa on this list.

> > > >

> > > > Yes, in a quiz, people are free to use any system, and if

> their

> > > > answer is correct, they maybe requested to explain the

method

> > they

> > > > have used, thereby respecting all.

> > > >

> > > > At the same time, we all must be cognescant of the fact that

> > this

> > > is

> > > > a KAS list where the methodology and techniques as taught by

> > > > Krushanji can be practiced and learnt.

> > > >

> > > > So please let us stick to KAS on this list. I am sure there

> are

> > > > many who know a myraid of techiques to solve a chart so if u

> are

> > > > learning KAS then by all means u can verify results off list.

> > > >

> > > > Going forward please let us stick to KAS on this list.

> > > >

> > > > Thanks for your co-operation.

> > > >

> > > > Cheers !!!

> > > > Ash

> > > > (Wearing my Moderator Cap).

> > > >

> > > > , " Amitabh

> > > Choudhury "

> > > > wrote:

> > > > >

> > > > > Hello everybody

> > > > >

> > > > > I was reading through contents on a website and noted that

> it

> > > > meantioned

> > > > > " Bhukti " and " antardasa " separately(i.e.

> > > > > MD - Bhukti - antardasa

> > > > > MERC MERC SATN

> > > > >

> > > > > This confused me. Gosh if Antardasa and bhukti are indeed

> > > > different then

> > > > > back to the primary school for me:)

> > > > > Could somebody comment about the difference between bhukti

> and

> > > > antardasa?

> > > > >

> > > > > regards,

> > > > > Amitabh.

> > > > >

April 23, 2006

Dear Ash,

For general knowledge could you kindly mention specific schools of

thought practiaclly using Vinshottari dashsa starting from other

than moon which is easy now a days very easywith the help of SWs.

Thanks and regards,

tw

, " tw853 " <tw853

wrote:

>

> , Ash <ashsam73@>

> wrote:

> >

> > Dear TW,

> >

> > I am sure you must be aware that there are school of thought

> that use Vinshottari dashsa starting from Sun, From moon, from

lagna

> etc etc etc.

> >

> > As per KAS we are using Vinshottari dashsa starting only from

> Moon.

> >

> > I hope its clear.

> >

> > I hope its also clear that we are not using sub-sub divisions

> and the naming conventions that we are using here on this list.

> >

> > Going forward that will not be a confusion.

> >

> > Yes, one more thing, here we are using the BAV definition as

> given by Varhararmira and not Parasara.

> >

> > My only point is that lets stick to KAS and its technique here

> on this list so that there are no confusions.

> >

> > Cheers !!!

> > Ash

> >

> > tw853 <tw853@> wrote:

> > Dear Ash,

> >

> > There is only and the only one Vimsottari Dasa prevented by

> > Parasara, Father Hindu Predictive astrology, which can not be a

> > monopoly by any school of thought. It is and can be devided to

sub

> > divivision as much as desired. You're using sub as per Prasara

and

> > sub-sub as per your own way of devision. I am not advocating to

> use

> > standard sub-sub division in this forum. What I am saying is

about

> > original division of Prasara's Vimsottari Dasa but not making

> > confusion as you are saying.

> >

> > Regards,

> >

> > tw

> >

> > , " ashsam73 "

> > wrote:

> > >

> > > Dear TW,

> > >

> > > I do not understand a simple fact. We do not use sub-sub

> > divisions

> > > or sub-sub-sub divisions or even upto a level that gives in

> > hours.

> > > We also do not use KP Ayanansa or Lahiri here. We are using

> > > Krushnas Ayanamsa only. This is part and parcel of this

system.

> > >

> > > Sub-Sub, or Sub-Sub-Sub etc are not used in KAS. We are using

MD

> > > and AD and calculations of that u can get from Lesson 9.

> > >

> > > http://krushna.sageasita.com/pdf/lesson09.pdf

> > >

> > > As per KAS we are timing events using the following.

> > >

> > > 1) Vinshottari dashsa and only 2 Levels. MD = Mahadasha and AD

=

> > > antar dashsa. (This is what we call it here).

> > >

> > > 2) Once we find the antar dashsa to narrow it we divide the

> antra

> > > (AD) into 3 equal sectors.

> > >

> > > 3) We then find in which sectors the event will fall in.

> > >

> > > 4) After finding the proper sector, we then narrow the event

> down

> > to

> > > within 13 days using Suns transit over powerful planets as per

> the

> > > WS (Ashtakvarg power)

> > >

> > > From this you can clearly see, that there is no sub-sub or sub-

> sub-

> > > sub etc.

> > >

> > > Such things might be used by other schools of Jyotish Shastra

> > which

> > > is fine as per their systems.

> > >

> > > This list has been created by Krushaji so that KAS can be

> brought

> > > forward to world and here KAS learners can learn KAS and how

to

> > time

> > > events using this unique technique.

> > >

> > > There are many system, schools of thoughts and many different

> > > approaches and systems and all systems are good and I am sure

if

> > > used properly using any systems one can time events perfectly.

> > >

> > > Here on this list, please let us stick to KAS for benefit for

> > > members so that such confusions do not arise.

> > >

> > > I hope you understand.

> > >

> > > Thank you for your co-operation.

> > > Cheers !!!

> > > Ash

> > >

> > > , " tw853 "

> > > wrote:

> > > >

> > > > Dear Ash,

> > > >

> > > > I'm very sorry for causing you worry by explaining sub-sub

> > > division

> > > > of Vimsottari Dasa (Parasara's key to prognostication)

> according

> > > the

> > > > inventor's allocation of years to each planet as follows:

> > > >

> > > > Out of total 120 years shares are given 6y to Sun, 10y Moon,

7y

> > > > Mars, 18y Rahu, 16y Jupiter, 19y Sturn, 17y Mercury, 7y Ketu

> and

> > > 20y

> > > > to Venus. These shares hold the same propotion in all

periods,

> > > Dasha,

> > > > Bhukti, Anthara, Sookshama and so on (B. SURYANARAIN RAO,

see

> > note

> > > > below), giving Bhukti= Dasha period (Bhukti /120); Anthara=

D

> > > (B/120)

> > > > (Anthara /120); Sukshama= D (B/120) (A/120) (Sukshama/120)

and

> > so

> > > > on, e.g.. Venus Dasa/ Saturn Bhukti= 20 (19/120)= 3.166667=

3y

> +

> > > > 0.166667x12=3y:2m; Venus Dasa/ Satrun Bhukti/Jupiter

Anthara=

> 20

> > > > (19/120)(16/120)= 0.422222y= 0.422222x12= 5m:0.066666x30d=

> 5m:2d;

> > > > Ven/Jup/Rahu/ Sat= 20(16/120)(18/120)(19/120)= 0.063333yx

> 12x30=

> > > 23d;

> > > > Mer/Ven/Sat/Jup/Mer= 17(20/120)(19/120)(16/120)(17/120)=

> > > > 0.0084737yx12x30= 3d or up to 6th level Mer/Ven/Sat/Jup/Mer/

> Rah=

> > > > 0.0084737(18/120)x12x30= 11 hours and so on. This simple

> > > rathematics

> > > > will give the same durations of Bhukti, Anthara, Sukshama

and

> so

> > on

> > > > in any dasa duration table, KSK Readers, KP Emphemeris,

Lahiri

> > > > Emphemeris, KAS SW, any astrology text book of J. N. Bhasin,

> > > James

> > > > T. Braha, David Frawley, Hart de Foue & Robert Svoboda, B.V.

> > > Raman,

> > > > All India Astrological Services etc. If anything different

> from

> > > this

> > > > simple calculations, there is an error for correction not

for

> > > > discussion. In other words, all tables should be the same.

> > > >

> > > > Note: Suryanarain Rao: Strijataka or Female Horoscopy, 1964,

p

> > 154

> > > >

> http://www.sulekha.com/content/epress/samples/EB_RAMAN_015_S.pdf

> > > >

> > > > Regards,

> > > >

> > > > tw

> > > >

> > > > , " ashsam73 "

> > > > wrote:

> > > > >

> > > > > Dear Amitabh, TW and List Members,

> > > > >

> > > > > Its post like these that causes that would cause any

> Moderator

> > > > Worry.

> > > > >

> > > > > This is a KAS list, and as per KAS we do not use levels

> below

> > MD

> > > > and

> > > > > AD. MD = Mahadashsa and AD = Antar Dashsa. Period. After

> > that

> > > > to

> > > > > narrow it down we use sectors and then suns transit to

> narrow

> > it

> > > > > down to within 13 days of the event.

> > > > >

> > > > > We also use Krushnas Ayanamsa on this list.

> > > > >

> > > > > Yes, in a quiz, people are free to use any system, and if

> > their

> > > > > answer is correct, they maybe requested to explain the

> method

> > > they

> > > > > have used, thereby respecting all.

> > > > >

> > > > > At the same time, we all must be cognescant of the fact

that

> > > this

> > > > is

> > > > > a KAS list where the methodology and techniques as taught

by

> > > > > Krushanji can be practiced and learnt.

> > > > >

> > > > > So please let us stick to KAS on this list. I am sure

there

> > are

> > > > > many who know a myraid of techiques to solve a chart so if

u

> > are

> > > > > learning KAS then by all means u can verify results off

list.

> > > > >

> > > > > Going forward please let us stick to KAS on this list.

> > > > >

> > > > > Thanks for your co-operation.

> > > > >

> > > > > Cheers !!!

> > > > > Ash

> > > > > (Wearing my Moderator Cap).

> > > > >

> > > > > , " Amitabh

> > > > Choudhury "

> > > > > wrote:

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Hello everybody

> > > > > >

> > > > > > I was reading through contents on a website and noted

that

> > it

> > > > > meantioned

> > > > > > " Bhukti " and " antardasa " separately(i.e.

> > > > > > MD - Bhukti - antardasa

> > > > > > MERC MERC SATN

> > > > > >

> > > > > > This confused me. Gosh if Antardasa and bhukti are

indeed

> > > > > different then

> > > > > > back to the primary school for me:)

> > > > > > Could somebody comment about the difference between

bhukti

> > and

> > > > > antardasa?

> > > > > >

> > > > > > regards,

> > > > > > Amitabh.

> > > > > >

April 23, 2006

Dear TW,

Kindly Check JHL. In that visit the Dashas, Nakshatra Dasha and

Click on options. You will see that you can start Visnshottari

dashsa from 17 different starting point.

Cheers !!!

Ash

, " tw853 " <tw853

wrote:

>

> Dear Ash,

>

> For general knowledge could you kindly mention specific schools of

> thought practiaclly using Vinshottari dashsa starting from other

> than moon which is easy now a days very easywith the help of SWs.

>

> Thanks and regards,

>

> tw

>

> , " tw853 " <tw853@>

> wrote:

> >

> > , Ash <ashsam73@>

> > wrote:

> > >

> > > Dear TW,

> > >

> > > I am sure you must be aware that there are school of thought

> > that use Vinshottari dashsa starting from Sun, From moon, from

> lagna

> > etc etc etc.

> > >

> > > As per KAS we are using Vinshottari dashsa starting only

from

> > Moon.

> > >

> > > I hope its clear.

> > >

> > > I hope its also clear that we are not using sub-sub

divisions

> > and the naming conventions that we are using here on this list.

> > >

> > > Going forward that will not be a confusion.

> > >

> > > Yes, one more thing, here we are using the BAV definition as

> > given by Varhararmira and not Parasara.

> > >

> > > My only point is that lets stick to KAS and its technique

here

> > on this list so that there are no confusions.

> > >

> > > Cheers !!!

> > > Ash

> > >

> > > tw853 <tw853@> wrote:

> > > Dear Ash,

> > >

> > > There is only and the only one Vimsottari Dasa prevented by

> > > Parasara, Father Hindu Predictive astrology, which can not be

a

> > > monopoly by any school of thought. It is and can be devided to

> sub

> > > divivision as much as desired. You're using sub as per Prasara

> and

> > > sub-sub as per your own way of devision. I am not advocating

to

> > use

> > > standard sub-sub division in this forum. What I am saying is

> about

> > > original division of Prasara's Vimsottari Dasa but not making

> > > confusion as you are saying.

> > >

> > > Regards,

> > >

> > > tw

> > >

> > > , " ashsam73 "

> > > wrote:

> > > >

> > > > Dear TW,

> > > >

> > > > I do not understand a simple fact. We do not use sub-sub

> > > divisions

> > > > or sub-sub-sub divisions or even upto a level that gives in

> > > hours.

> > > > We also do not use KP Ayanansa or Lahiri here. We are using

> > > > Krushnas Ayanamsa only. This is part and parcel of this

> system.

> > > >

> > > > Sub-Sub, or Sub-Sub-Sub etc are not used in KAS. We are

using

> MD

> > > > and AD and calculations of that u can get from Lesson 9.

> > > >

> > > > http://krushna.sageasita.com/pdf/lesson09.pdf

> > > >

> > > > As per KAS we are timing events using the following.

> > > >

> > > > 1) Vinshottari dashsa and only 2 Levels. MD = Mahadasha and

AD

> =

> > > > antar dashsa. (This is what we call it here).

> > > >

> > > > 2) Once we find the antar dashsa to narrow it we divide the

> > antra

> > > > (AD) into 3 equal sectors.

> > > >

> > > > 3) We then find in which sectors the event will fall in.

> > > >

> > > > 4) After finding the proper sector, we then narrow the event

> > down

> > > to

> > > > within 13 days using Suns transit over powerful planets as

per

> > the

> > > > WS (Ashtakvarg power)

> > > >

> > > > From this you can clearly see, that there is no sub-sub or

sub-

> > sub-

> > > > sub etc.

> > > >

> > > > Such things might be used by other schools of Jyotish

Shastra

> > > which

> > > > is fine as per their systems.

> > > >

> > > > This list has been created by Krushaji so that KAS can be

> > brought

> > > > forward to world and here KAS learners can learn KAS and how

> to

> > > time

> > > > events using this unique technique.

> > > >

> > > > There are many system, schools of thoughts and many

different

> > > > approaches and systems and all systems are good and I am

sure

> if

> > > > used properly using any systems one can time events

perfectly.

> > > >

> > > > Here on this list, please let us stick to KAS for benefit

for

> > > > members so that such confusions do not arise.

> > > >

> > > > I hope you understand.

> > > >

> > > > Thank you for your co-operation.

> > > > Cheers !!!

> > > > Ash

> > > >

> > > > , " tw853 "

> > > > wrote:

> > > > >

> > > > > Dear Ash,

> > > > >

> > > > > I'm very sorry for causing you worry by explaining sub-sub

> > > > division

> > > > > of Vimsottari Dasa (Parasara's key to prognostication)

> > according

> > > > the

> > > > > inventor's allocation of years to each planet as follows:

> > > > >

> > > > > Out of total 120 years shares are given 6y to Sun, 10y

Moon,

> 7y

> > > > > Mars, 18y Rahu, 16y Jupiter, 19y Sturn, 17y Mercury, 7y

Ketu

> > and

> > > > 20y

> > > > > to Venus. These shares hold the same propotion in all

> periods,

> > > > Dasha,

> > > > > Bhukti, Anthara, Sookshama and so on (B. SURYANARAIN RAO,

> see

> > > note

> > > > > below), giving Bhukti= Dasha period (Bhukti /120);

Anthara=

> D

> > > > (B/120)

> > > > > (Anthara /120); Sukshama= D (B/120) (A/120) (Sukshama/120)

> and

> > > so

> > > > > on, e.g.. Venus Dasa/ Saturn Bhukti= 20 (19/120)=

3.166667=

> 3y

> > +

> > > > > 0.166667x12=3y:2m; Venus Dasa/ Satrun Bhukti/Jupiter

> Anthara=

> > 20

> > > > > (19/120)(16/120)= 0.422222y= 0.422222x12= 5m:0.066666x30d=

> > 5m:2d;

> > > > > Ven/Jup/Rahu/ Sat= 20(16/120)(18/120)(19/120)= 0.063333yx

> > 12x30=

> > > > 23d;

> > > > > Mer/Ven/Sat/Jup/Mer= 17(20/120)(19/120)(16/120)(17/120)=

> > > > > 0.0084737yx12x30= 3d or up to 6th level

Mer/Ven/Sat/Jup/Mer/

> > Rah=

> > > > > 0.0084737(18/120)x12x30= 11 hours and so on. This simple

> > > > rathematics

> > > > > will give the same durations of Bhukti, Anthara, Sukshama

> and

> > so

> > > on

> > > > > in any dasa duration table, KSK Readers, KP Emphemeris,

> Lahiri

> > > > > Emphemeris, KAS SW, any astrology text book of J. N.

Bhasin,

> > > > James

> > > > > T. Braha, David Frawley, Hart de Foue & Robert Svoboda,

B.V.

> > > > Raman,

> > > > > All India Astrological Services etc. If anything different

> > from

> > > > this

> > > > > simple calculations, there is an error for correction not

> for

> > > > > discussion. In other words, all tables should be the same.

> > > > >

> > > > > Note: Suryanarain Rao: Strijataka or Female Horoscopy,

1964,

> p

> > > 154

> > > > >

> > http://www.sulekha.com/content/epress/samples/EB_RAMAN_015_S.pdf

> > > > >

> > > > > Regards,

> > > > >

> > > > > tw

> > > > >

> > > > > --- In

, " ashsam73 "

> > > > > wrote:

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Dear Amitabh, TW and List Members,

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Its post like these that causes that would cause any

> > Moderator

> > > > > Worry.

> > > > > >

> > > > > > This is a KAS list, and as per KAS we do not use levels

> > below

> > > MD

> > > > > and

> > > > > > AD. MD = Mahadashsa and AD = Antar Dashsa. Period. After

> > > that

> > > > > to

> > > > > > narrow it down we use sectors and then suns transit to

> > narrow

> > > it

> > > > > > down to within 13 days of the event.

> > > > > >

> > > > > > We also use Krushnas Ayanamsa on this list.

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Yes, in a quiz, people are free to use any system, and

if

> > > their

> > > > > > answer is correct, they maybe requested to explain the

> > method

> > > > they

> > > > > > have used, thereby respecting all.

> > > > > >

> > > > > > At the same time, we all must be cognescant of the fact

> that

> > > > this

> > > > > is

> > > > > > a KAS list where the methodology and techniques as

taught

> by

> > > > > > Krushanji can be practiced and learnt.

> > > > > >

> > > > > > So please let us stick to KAS on this list. I am sure

> there

> > > are

> > > > > > many who know a myraid of techiques to solve a chart so

if

> u

> > > are

> > > > > > learning KAS then by all means u can verify results off

> list.

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Going forward please let us stick to KAS on this list.

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Thanks for your co-operation.

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Cheers !!!

> > > > > > Ash

> > > > > > (Wearing my Moderator Cap).

> > > > > >

> > > > > > --- In

, " Amitabh

> > > > > Choudhury "

> > > > > > wrote:

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > Hello everybody

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > I was reading through contents on a website and noted

> that

> > > it

> > > > > > meantioned

> > > > > > > " Bhukti " and " antardasa " separately(i.e.

> > > > > > > MD - Bhukti - antardasa

> > > > > > > MERC MERC SATN

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > This confused me. Gosh if Antardasa and bhukti are

> indeed

> > > > > > different then

> > > > > > > back to the primary school for me:)

> > > > > > > Could somebody comment about the difference between

> bhukti

> > > and

> > > > > > antardasa?

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > regards,

> > > > > > > Amitabh.

> > > > > > >

April 23, 2006

Dear Ash,

This is a showdown of SWs, of which only some are in line with

Parasara's Vimshotarri Dasa guidelines regarding starting dasa.

My request is about the specific names of schools of thoughts, you

mentioned in general, that are practically using Vimshotarri Dasa

starting from other than Moon.

Please names of schools in practice not in theory.

Thanks and regards,

tw

, " ashsam73 "

<ashsam73 wrote:

>

> Dear TW,

> Kindly Check JHL. In that visit the Dashas, Nakshatra Dasha and

> Click on options. You will see that you can start Visnshottari

> dashsa from 17 different starting point.

> Cheers !!!

> Ash

>

> , " tw853 " <tw853@>

> wrote:

> >

> > Dear Ash,

> >

> > For general knowledge could you kindly mention specific schools

of

> > thought practiaclly using Vinshottari dashsa starting from other

> > than moon which is easy now a days very easywith the help of

SWs.

> >

> > Thanks and regards,

> >

> > tw

> >

> > , " tw853 "

<tw853@>

> > wrote:

> > >

> > > , Ash

<ashsam73@>

> > > wrote:

> > > >

> > > > Dear TW,

> > > >

> > > > I am sure you must be aware that there are school of

thought

> > > that use Vinshottari dashsa starting from Sun, From moon, from

> > lagna

> > > etc etc etc.

> > > >

> > > > As per KAS we are using Vinshottari dashsa starting only

> from

> > > Moon.

> > > >

> > > > I hope its clear.

> > > >

> > > > I hope its also clear that we are not using sub-sub

> divisions

> > > and the naming conventions that we are using here on this list.

> > > >

> > > > Going forward that will not be a confusion.

> > > >

> > > > Yes, one more thing, here we are using the BAV definition

as

> > > given by Varhararmira and not Parasara.

> > > >

> > > > My only point is that lets stick to KAS and its technique

> here

> > > on this list so that there are no confusions.

> > > >

> > > > Cheers !!!

> > > > Ash

> > > >

> > > > tw853 <tw853@> wrote:

> > > > Dear Ash,

> > > >

> > > > There is only and the only one Vimsottari Dasa prevented by

> > > > Parasara, Father Hindu Predictive astrology, which can not

be

> a

> > > > monopoly by any school of thought. It is and can be devided

to

> > sub

> > > > divivision as much as desired. You're using sub as per

Prasara

> > and

> > > > sub-sub as per your own way of devision. I am not advocating

> to

> > > use

> > > > standard sub-sub division in this forum. What I am saying is

> > about

> > > > original division of Prasara's Vimsottari Dasa but not

making

> > > > confusion as you are saying.

> > > >

> > > > Regards,

> > > >

> > > > tw

> > > >

> > > > , " ashsam73 "

> > > > wrote:

> > > > >

> > > > > Dear TW,

> > > > >

> > > > > I do not understand a simple fact. We do not use sub-sub

> > > > divisions

> > > > > or sub-sub-sub divisions or even upto a level that gives

in

> > > > hours.

> > > > > We also do not use KP Ayanansa or Lahiri here. We are

using

> > > > > Krushnas Ayanamsa only. This is part and parcel of this

> > system.

> > > > >

> > > > > Sub-Sub, or Sub-Sub-Sub etc are not used in KAS. We are

> using

> > MD

> > > > > and AD and calculations of that u can get from Lesson 9.

> > > > >

> > > > > http://krushna.sageasita.com/pdf/lesson09.pdf

> > > > >

> > > > > As per KAS we are timing events using the following.

> > > > >

> > > > > 1) Vinshottari dashsa and only 2 Levels. MD = Mahadasha

and

> AD

> > =

> > > > > antar dashsa. (This is what we call it here).

> > > > >

> > > > > 2) Once we find the antar dashsa to narrow it we divide

the

> > > antra

> > > > > (AD) into 3 equal sectors.

> > > > >

> > > > > 3) We then find in which sectors the event will fall in.

> > > > >

> > > > > 4) After finding the proper sector, we then narrow the

event

> > > down

> > > > to

> > > > > within 13 days using Suns transit over powerful planets as

> per

> > > the

> > > > > WS (Ashtakvarg power)

> > > > >

> > > > > From this you can clearly see, that there is no sub-sub or

> sub-

> > > sub-

> > > > > sub etc.

> > > > >

> > > > > Such things might be used by other schools of Jyotish

> Shastra

> > > > which

> > > > > is fine as per their systems.

> > > > >

> > > > > This list has been created by Krushaji so that KAS can be

> > > brought

> > > > > forward to world and here KAS learners can learn KAS and

how

> > to

> > > > time

> > > > > events using this unique technique.

> > > > >

> > > > > There are many system, schools of thoughts and many

> different

> > > > > approaches and systems and all systems are good and I am

> sure

> > if

> > > > > used properly using any systems one can time events

> perfectly.

> > > > >

> > > > > Here on this list, please let us stick to KAS for benefit

> for

> > > > > members so that such confusions do not arise.

> > > > >

> > > > > I hope you understand.

> > > > >

> > > > > Thank you for your co-operation.

> > > > > Cheers !!!

> > > > > Ash

> > > > >

> > > > > , " tw853 "

> > > > > wrote:

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Dear Ash,

> > > > > >

> > > > > > I'm very sorry for causing you worry by explaining sub-

sub

> > > > > division

> > > > > > of Vimsottari Dasa (Parasara's key to prognostication)

> > > according

> > > > > the

> > > > > > inventor's allocation of years to each planet as follows:

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Out of total 120 years shares are given 6y to Sun, 10y

> Moon,

> > 7y

> > > > > > Mars, 18y Rahu, 16y Jupiter, 19y Sturn, 17y Mercury, 7y

> Ketu

> > > and

> > > > > 20y

> > > > > > to Venus. These shares hold the same propotion in all

> > periods,

> > > > > Dasha,

> > > > > > Bhukti, Anthara, Sookshama and so on (B. SURYANARAIN

RAO,

> > see

> > > > note

> > > > > > below), giving Bhukti= Dasha period (Bhukti /120);

> Anthara=

> > D

> > > > > (B/120)

> > > > > > (Anthara /120); Sukshama= D (B/120) (A/120)

(Sukshama/120)

> > and

> > > > so

> > > > > > on, e.g.. Venus Dasa/ Saturn Bhukti= 20 (19/120)=

> 3.166667=

> > 3y

> > > +

> > > > > > 0.166667x12=3y:2m; Venus Dasa/ Satrun Bhukti/Jupiter

> > Anthara=

> > > 20

> > > > > > (19/120)(16/120)= 0.422222y= 0.422222x12=

5m:0.066666x30d=

> > > 5m:2d;

> > > > > > Ven/Jup/Rahu/ Sat= 20(16/120)(18/120)(19/120)=

0.063333yx

> > > 12x30=

> > > > > 23d;

> > > > > > Mer/Ven/Sat/Jup/Mer= 17(20/120)(19/120)(16/120)(17/120)=

> > > > > > 0.0084737yx12x30= 3d or up to 6th level

> Mer/Ven/Sat/Jup/Mer/

> > > Rah=

> > > > > > 0.0084737(18/120)x12x30= 11 hours and so on. This simple

> > > > > rathematics

> > > > > > will give the same durations of Bhukti, Anthara,

Sukshama

> > and

> > > so

> > > > on

> > > > > > in any dasa duration table, KSK Readers, KP Emphemeris,

> > Lahiri

> > > > > > Emphemeris, KAS SW, any astrology text book of J. N.

> Bhasin,

> > > > > James

> > > > > > T. Braha, David Frawley, Hart de Foue & Robert Svoboda,

> B.V.

> > > > > Raman,

> > > > > > All India Astrological Services etc. If anything

different

> > > from

> > > > > this

> > > > > > simple calculations, there is an error for correction

not

> > for

> > > > > > discussion. In other words, all tables should be the

same.

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Note: Suryanarain Rao: Strijataka or Female Horoscopy,

> 1964,

> > p

> > > > 154

> > > > > >

> > >

http://www.sulekha.com/content/epress/samples/EB_RAMAN_015_S.pdf

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Regards,

> > > > > >

> > > > > > tw

> > > > > >

> > > > > > --- In

> , " ashsam73 "

> > > > > > wrote:

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > Dear Amitabh, TW and List Members,

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > Its post like these that causes that would cause any

> > > Moderator

> > > > > > Worry.

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > This is a KAS list, and as per KAS we do not use

levels

> > > below

> > > > MD

> > > > > > and

> > > > > > > AD. MD = Mahadashsa and AD = Antar Dashsa. Period.

After

> > > > that

> > > > > > to

> > > > > > > narrow it down we use sectors and then suns transit to

> > > narrow

> > > > it

> > > > > > > down to within 13 days of the event.

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > We also use Krushnas Ayanamsa on this list.

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > Yes, in a quiz, people are free to use any system, and

> if

> > > > their

> > > > > > > answer is correct, they maybe requested to explain the

> > > method

> > > > > they

> > > > > > > have used, thereby respecting all.

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > At the same time, we all must be cognescant of the

fact

> > that

> > > > > this

> > > > > > is

> > > > > > > a KAS list where the methodology and techniques as

> taught

> > by

> > > > > > > Krushanji can be practiced and learnt.

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > So please let us stick to KAS on this list. I am sure

> > there

> > > > are

> > > > > > > many who know a myraid of techiques to solve a chart

so

> if

> > u

> > > > are

> > > > > > > learning KAS then by all means u can verify results

off

> > list.

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > Going forward please let us stick to KAS on this list.

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > Thanks for your co-operation.

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > Cheers !!!

> > > > > > > Ash

> > > > > > > (Wearing my Moderator Cap).

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > --- In

> , " Amitabh

> > > > > > Choudhury "

> > > > > > > wrote:

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > Hello everybody

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > I was reading through contents on a website and

noted

> > that

> > > > it

> > > > > > > meantioned

> > > > > > > > " Bhukti " and " antardasa " separately(i.e.

> > > > > > > > MD - Bhukti - antardasa

> > > > > > > > MERC MERC SATN

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > This confused me. Gosh if Antardasa and bhukti are

> > indeed

> > > > > > > different then

> > > > > > > > back to the primary school for me:)

> > > > > > > > Could somebody comment about the difference between

> > bhukti

> > > > and

> > > > > > > antardasa?

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > regards,

> > > > > > > > Amitabh.

> > > > > > > >

April 23, 2006

Dear TW,

I am not interested in such a conversation. You asked for where its

used and I have showed u and I am sure u must have seen 17 different

ways Vimshottari dashsa can be started on.

I do not intend to continue this disucsion further as this is not

related to KAS and getting reherotical.

Lets get back to KAS please.

Thanks,

Cheers !!!

Ash

, " tw853 " <tw853

wrote:

>

> Dear Ash,

>

> This is a showdown of SWs, of which only some are in line with

> Parasara's Vimshotarri Dasa guidelines regarding starting dasa.

>

> My request is about the specific names of schools of thoughts, you

> mentioned in general, that are practically using Vimshotarri Dasa

> starting from other than Moon.

>

> Please names of schools in practice not in theory.

>

> Thanks and regards,

>

> tw

>

> , " ashsam73 "

> <ashsam73@> wrote:

> >

> > Dear TW,

> > Kindly Check JHL. In that visit the Dashas, Nakshatra Dasha and

> > Click on options. You will see that you can start Visnshottari

> > dashsa from 17 different starting point.

> > Cheers !!!

> > Ash

> >

> > , " tw853 "

<tw853@>

> > wrote:

> > >

> > > Dear Ash,

> > >

> > > For general knowledge could you kindly mention specific

schools

> of

> > > thought practiaclly using Vinshottari dashsa starting from

other

> > > than moon which is easy now a days very easywith the help of

> SWs.

> > >

> > > Thanks and regards,

> > >

> > > tw

> > >

> > > , " tw853 "

> <tw853@>

> > > wrote:

> > > >

> > > > , Ash

> <ashsam73@>

> > > > wrote:

> > > > >

> > > > > Dear TW,

> > > > >

> > > > > I am sure you must be aware that there are school of

> thought

> > > > that use Vinshottari dashsa starting from Sun, From moon,

from

> > > lagna

> > > > etc etc etc.

> > > > >

> > > > > As per KAS we are using Vinshottari dashsa starting only

> > from

> > > > Moon.

> > > > >

> > > > > I hope its clear.

> > > > >

> > > > > I hope its also clear that we are not using sub-sub

> > divisions

> > > > and the naming conventions that we are using here on this

list.

> > > > >

> > > > > Going forward that will not be a confusion.

> > > > >

> > > > > Yes, one more thing, here we are using the BAV

definition

> as

> > > > given by Varhararmira and not Parasara.

> > > > >

> > > > > My only point is that lets stick to KAS and its

technique

> > here

> > > > on this list so that there are no confusions.

> > > > >

> > > > > Cheers !!!

> > > > > Ash

> > > > >

> > > > > tw853 <tw853@> wrote:

> > > > > Dear Ash,

> > > > >

> > > > > There is only and the only one Vimsottari Dasa prevented

by

> > > > > Parasara, Father Hindu Predictive astrology, which can not

> be

> > a

> > > > > monopoly by any school of thought. It is and can be

devided

> to

> > > sub

> > > > > divivision as much as desired. You're using sub as per

> Prasara

> > > and

> > > > > sub-sub as per your own way of devision. I am not

advocating

> > to

> > > > use

> > > > > standard sub-sub division in this forum. What I am saying

is

> > > about

> > > > > original division of Prasara's Vimsottari Dasa but not

> making

> > > > > confusion as you are saying.

> > > > >

> > > > > Regards,

> > > > >

> > > > > tw

> > > > >

> > > > > --- In

, " ashsam73 "

> > > > > wrote:

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Dear TW,

> > > > > >

> > > > > > I do not understand a simple fact. We do not use sub-sub

> > > > > divisions

> > > > > > or sub-sub-sub divisions or even upto a level that gives

> in

> > > > > hours.

> > > > > > We also do not use KP Ayanansa or Lahiri here. We are

> using

> > > > > > Krushnas Ayanamsa only. This is part and parcel of this

> > > system.

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Sub-Sub, or Sub-Sub-Sub etc are not used in KAS. We are

> > using

> > > MD

> > > > > > and AD and calculations of that u can get from Lesson 9.

> > > > > >

> > > > > > http://krushna.sageasita.com/pdf/lesson09.pdf

> > > > > >

> > > > > > As per KAS we are timing events using the following.

> > > > > >

> > > > > > 1) Vinshottari dashsa and only 2 Levels. MD = Mahadasha

> and

> > AD

> > > =

> > > > > > antar dashsa. (This is what we call it here).

> > > > > >

> > > > > > 2) Once we find the antar dashsa to narrow it we divide

> the

> > > > antra

> > > > > > (AD) into 3 equal sectors.

> > > > > >

> > > > > > 3) We then find in which sectors the event will fall in.

> > > > > >

> > > > > > 4) After finding the proper sector, we then narrow the

> event

> > > > down

> > > > > to

> > > > > > within 13 days using Suns transit over powerful planets

as

> > per

> > > > the

> > > > > > WS (Ashtakvarg power)

> > > > > >

> > > > > > From this you can clearly see, that there is no sub-sub

or

> > sub-

> > > > sub-

> > > > > > sub etc.

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Such things might be used by other schools of Jyotish

> > Shastra

> > > > > which

> > > > > > is fine as per their systems.

> > > > > >

> > > > > > This list has been created by Krushaji so that KAS can

be

> > > > brought

> > > > > > forward to world and here KAS learners can learn KAS and

> how

> > > to

> > > > > time

> > > > > > events using this unique technique.

> > > > > >

> > > > > > There are many system, schools of thoughts and many

> > different

> > > > > > approaches and systems and all systems are good and I am

> > sure

> > > if

> > > > > > used properly using any systems one can time events

> > perfectly.

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Here on this list, please let us stick to KAS for

benefit

> > for

> > > > > > members so that such confusions do not arise.

> > > > > >

> > > > > > I hope you understand.

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Thank you for your co-operation.

> > > > > > Cheers !!!

> > > > > > Ash

> > > > > >

> > > > > > , " tw853 "

> > > > > > wrote:

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > Dear Ash,

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > I'm very sorry for causing you worry by explaining sub-

> sub

> > > > > > division

> > > > > > > of Vimsottari Dasa (Parasara's key to prognostication)

> > > > according

> > > > > > the

> > > > > > > inventor's allocation of years to each planet as

follows:

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > Out of total 120 years shares are given 6y to Sun, 10y

> > Moon,

> > > 7y

> > > > > > > Mars, 18y Rahu, 16y Jupiter, 19y Sturn, 17y Mercury,

7y

> > Ketu

> > > > and

> > > > > > 20y

> > > > > > > to Venus. These shares hold the same propotion in all

> > > periods,

> > > > > > Dasha,

> > > > > > > Bhukti, Anthara, Sookshama and so on (B. SURYANARAIN

> RAO,

> > > see

> > > > > note

> > > > > > > below), giving Bhukti= Dasha period (Bhukti /120);

> > Anthara=

> > > D

> > > > > > (B/120)

> > > > > > > (Anthara /120); Sukshama= D (B/120) (A/120)

> (Sukshama/120)

> > > and

> > > > > so

> > > > > > > on, e.g.. Venus Dasa/ Saturn Bhukti= 20 (19/120)=

> > 3.166667=

> > > 3y

> > > > +

> > > > > > > 0.166667x12=3y:2m; Venus Dasa/ Satrun Bhukti/Jupiter

> > > Anthara=

> > > > 20

> > > > > > > (19/120)(16/120)= 0.422222y= 0.422222x12=

> 5m:0.066666x30d=

> > > > 5m:2d;

> > > > > > > Ven/Jup/Rahu/ Sat= 20(16/120)(18/120)(19/120)=

> 0.063333yx

> > > > 12x30=

> > > > > > 23d;

> > > > > > > Mer/Ven/Sat/Jup/Mer= 17(20/120)(19/120)(16/120)(17/120)

=

> > > > > > > 0.0084737yx12x30= 3d or up to 6th level

> > Mer/Ven/Sat/Jup/Mer/

> > > > Rah=

> > > > > > > 0.0084737(18/120)x12x30= 11 hours and so on. This

simple

> > > > > > rathematics

> > > > > > > will give the same durations of Bhukti, Anthara,

> Sukshama

> > > and

> > > > so

> > > > > on

> > > > > > > in any dasa duration table, KSK Readers, KP

Emphemeris,

> > > Lahiri

> > > > > > > Emphemeris, KAS SW, any astrology text book of J. N.

> > Bhasin,

> > > > > > James

> > > > > > > T. Braha, David Frawley, Hart de Foue & Robert

Svoboda,

> > B.V.

> > > > > > Raman,

> > > > > > > All India Astrological Services etc. If anything

> different

> > > > from

> > > > > > this

> > > > > > > simple calculations, there is an error for correction

> not

> > > for

> > > > > > > discussion. In other words, all tables should be the

> same.

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > Note: Suryanarain Rao: Strijataka or Female Horoscopy,

> > 1964,

> > > p

> > > > > 154

> > > > > > >

> > > >

> http://www.sulekha.com/content/epress/samples/EB_RAMAN_015_S.pdf

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > Regards,

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > tw

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > --- In

> > , " ashsam73 "

> > > > > > > wrote:

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > Dear Amitabh, TW and List Members,

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > Its post like these that causes that would cause any

> > > > Moderator

> > > > > > > Worry.

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > This is a KAS list, and as per KAS we do not use

> levels

> > > > below

> > > > > MD

> > > > > > > and

> > > > > > > > AD. MD = Mahadashsa and AD = Antar Dashsa. Period.

> After

> > > > > that

> > > > > > > to

> > > > > > > > narrow it down we use sectors and then suns transit

to

> > > > narrow

> > > > > it

> > > > > > > > down to within 13 days of the event.

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > We also use Krushnas Ayanamsa on this list.

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > Yes, in a quiz, people are free to use any system,

and

> > if

> > > > > their

> > > > > > > > answer is correct, they maybe requested to explain

the

> > > > method

> > > > > > they

> > > > > > > > have used, thereby respecting all.

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > At the same time, we all must be cognescant of the

> fact

> > > that

> > > > > > this

> > > > > > > is

> > > > > > > > a KAS list where the methodology and techniques as

> > taught

> > > by

> > > > > > > > Krushanji can be practiced and learnt.

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > So please let us stick to KAS on this list. I am

sure

> > > there

> > > > > are

> > > > > > > > many who know a myraid of techiques to solve a chart

> so

> > if

> > > u

> > > > > are

> > > > > > > > learning KAS then by all means u can verify results

> off

> > > list.

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > Going forward please let us stick to KAS on this

list.

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > Thanks for your co-operation.

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > Cheers !!!

> > > > > > > > Ash

> > > > > > > > (Wearing my Moderator Cap).

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > --- In

> > , " Amitabh

> > > > > > > Choudhury "

> > > > > > > > wrote:

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > Hello everybody

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > I was reading through contents on a website and

> noted

> > > that

> > > > > it

> > > > > > > > meantioned

> > > > > > > > > " Bhukti " and " antardasa " separately(i.e.

> > > > > > > > > MD - Bhukti - antardasa

> > > > > > > > > MERC MERC SATN

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > This confused me. Gosh if Antardasa and bhukti are

> > > indeed

> > > > > > > > different then

> > > > > > > > > back to the primary school for me:)

> > > > > > > > > Could somebody comment about the difference

between

> > > bhukti

> > > > > and

> > > > > > > > antardasa?

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > regards,

> > > > > > > > > Amitabh.

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been

removed]

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > >

> > > > > >

> > > > >

April 23, 2006

Dear Ash,

Same to me.

> > > > > > I am sure you must be aware that there are school of

> > thought

> > > > > that use Vinshottari dashsa starting from Sun, From moon,

> from

> > > > lagna

> > > > > etc etc etc.

Regards,

tw

, " ashsam73 "

<ashsam73 wrote:

>

> Dear TW,

> I am not interested in such a conversation. You asked for where

its

> used and I have showed u and I am sure u must have seen 17

different

> ways Vimshottari dashsa can be started on.

> I do not intend to continue this disucsion further as this is not

> related to KAS and getting reherotical.

> Lets get back to KAS please.

> Thanks,

> Cheers !!!

> Ash

>

> , " tw853 " <tw853@>

> wrote:

> >

> > Dear Ash,

> >

> > This is a showdown of SWs, of which only some are in line with

> > Parasara's Vimshotarri Dasa guidelines regarding starting dasa.

> >

> > My request is about the specific names of schools of thoughts,

you

> > mentioned in general, that are practically using Vimshotarri

Dasa

> > starting from other than Moon.

> >

> > Please names of schools in practice not in theory.

> >

> > Thanks and regards,

> >

> > tw

> >

> > , " ashsam73 "

> > <ashsam73@> wrote:

> > >

> > > Dear TW,

> > > Kindly Check JHL. In that visit the Dashas, Nakshatra Dasha

and

> > > Click on options. You will see that you can start

Visnshottari

> > > dashsa from 17 different starting point.

> > > Cheers !!!

> > > Ash

> > >

> > > , " tw853 "

> <tw853@>

> > > wrote:

> > > >

> > > > Dear Ash,

> > > >

> > > > For general knowledge could you kindly mention specific

> schools

> > of

> > > > thought practiaclly using Vinshottari dashsa starting from

> other

> > > > than moon which is easy now a days very easywith the help of

> > SWs.

> > > >

> > > > Thanks and regards,

> > > >

> > > > tw

> > > >

> > > > , " tw853 "

> > <tw853@>

> > > > wrote:

> > > > >

> > > > > , Ash

> > <ashsam73@>

> > > > > wrote:

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Dear TW,

> > > > > >

> > > > > > I am sure you must be aware that there are school of

> > thought

> > > > > that use Vinshottari dashsa starting from Sun, From moon,

> from

> > > > lagna

> > > > > etc etc etc.

> > > > > >

> > > > > > As per KAS we are using Vinshottari dashsa starting

only

> > > from

> > > > > Moon.

> > > > > >

> > > > > > I hope its clear.

> > > > > >

> > > > > > I hope its also clear that we are not using sub-sub

> > > divisions

> > > > > and the naming conventions that we are using here on this

> list.

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Going forward that will not be a confusion.

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Yes, one more thing, here we are using the BAV

> definition

> > as

> > > > > given by Varhararmira and not Parasara.

> > > > > >

> > > > > > My only point is that lets stick to KAS and its

> technique

> > > here

> > > > > on this list so that there are no confusions.

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Cheers !!!

> > > > > > Ash

> > > > > >

> > > > > > tw853 <tw853@> wrote:

> > > > > > Dear Ash,

> > > > > >

> > > > > > There is only and the only one Vimsottari Dasa prevented

> by

> > > > > > Parasara, Father Hindu Predictive astrology, which can

not

> > be

> > > a

> > > > > > monopoly by any school of thought. It is and can be

> devided

> > to

> > > > sub

> > > > > > divivision as much as desired. You're using sub as per

> > Prasara

> > > > and

> > > > > > sub-sub as per your own way of devision. I am not

> advocating

> > > to

> > > > > use

> > > > > > standard sub-sub division in this forum. What I am

saying

> is

> > > > about

> > > > > > original division of Prasara's Vimsottari Dasa but not

> > making

> > > > > > confusion as you are saying.

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Regards,

> > > > > >

> > > > > > tw

> > > > > >

> > > > > > --- In

> , " ashsam73 "

> > > > > > wrote:

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > Dear TW,

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > I do not understand a simple fact. We do not use sub-

sub

> > > > > > divisions

> > > > > > > or sub-sub-sub divisions or even upto a level that

gives

> > in

> > > > > > hours.

> > > > > > > We also do not use KP Ayanansa or Lahiri here. We are

> > using

> > > > > > > Krushnas Ayanamsa only. This is part and parcel of

this

> > > > system.

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > Sub-Sub, or Sub-Sub-Sub etc are not used in KAS. We

are

> > > using

> > > > MD

> > > > > > > and AD and calculations of that u can get from Lesson

9.

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > http://krushna.sageasita.com/pdf/lesson09.pdf

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > As per KAS we are timing events using the following.

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > 1) Vinshottari dashsa and only 2 Levels. MD =

Mahadasha

> > and

> > > AD

> > > > =

> > > > > > > antar dashsa. (This is what we call it here).

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > 2) Once we find the antar dashsa to narrow it we

divide

> > the

> > > > > antra

> > > > > > > (AD) into 3 equal sectors.

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > 3) We then find in which sectors the event will fall

in.

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > 4) After finding the proper sector, we then narrow the

> > event

> > > > > down

> > > > > > to

> > > > > > > within 13 days using Suns transit over powerful

planets

> as

> > > per

> > > > > the

> > > > > > > WS (Ashtakvarg power)

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > From this you can clearly see, that there is no sub-

sub

> or

> > > sub-

> > > > > sub-

> > > > > > > sub etc.

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > Such things might be used by other schools of Jyotish

> > > Shastra

> > > > > > which

> > > > > > > is fine as per their systems.

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > This list has been created by Krushaji so that KAS can

> be

> > > > > brought

> > > > > > > forward to world and here KAS learners can learn KAS

and

> > how

> > > > to

> > > > > > time

> > > > > > > events using this unique technique.

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > There are many system, schools of thoughts and many

> > > different

> > > > > > > approaches and systems and all systems are good and I

am

> > > sure

> > > > if

> > > > > > > used properly using any systems one can time events

> > > perfectly.

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > Here on this list, please let us stick to KAS for

> benefit

> > > for

> > > > > > > members so that such confusions do not arise.

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > I hope you understand.

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > Thank you for your co-operation.

> > > > > > > Cheers !!!

> > > > > > > Ash

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > --- In

, " tw853 "

> > > > > > > wrote:

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > Dear Ash,

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > I'm very sorry for causing you worry by explaining

sub-

> > sub

> > > > > > > division

> > > > > > > > of Vimsottari Dasa (Parasara's key to

prognostication)

> > > > > according

> > > > > > > the

> > > > > > > > inventor's allocation of years to each planet as

> follows:

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > Out of total 120 years shares are given 6y to Sun,

10y

> > > Moon,

> > > > 7y

> > > > > > > > Mars, 18y Rahu, 16y Jupiter, 19y Sturn, 17y Mercury,

> 7y

> > > Ketu

> > > > > and

> > > > > > > 20y

> > > > > > > > to Venus. These shares hold the same propotion in

all

> > > > periods,

> > > > > > > Dasha,

> > > > > > > > Bhukti, Anthara, Sookshama and so on (B. SURYANARAIN

> > RAO,

> > > > see

> > > > > > note

> > > > > > > > below), giving Bhukti= Dasha period (Bhukti /120);

> > > Anthara=

> > > > D

> > > > > > > (B/120)

> > > > > > > > (Anthara /120); Sukshama= D (B/120) (A/120)

> > (Sukshama/120)

> > > > and

> > > > > > so

> > > > > > > > on, e.g.. Venus Dasa/ Saturn Bhukti= 20 (19/120)=

> > > 3.166667=

> > > > 3y

> > > > > +

> > > > > > > > 0.166667x12=3y:2m; Venus Dasa/ Satrun Bhukti/Jupiter

> > > > Anthara=

> > > > > 20

> > > > > > > > (19/120)(16/120)= 0.422222y= 0.422222x12=

> > 5m:0.066666x30d=

> > > > > 5m:2d;

> > > > > > > > Ven/Jup/Rahu/ Sat= 20(16/120)(18/120)(19/120)=

> > 0.063333yx

> > > > > 12x30=

> > > > > > > 23d;

> > > > > > > > Mer/Ven/Sat/Jup/Mer= 17(20/120)(19/120)(16/120)

(17/120)

> =

> > > > > > > > 0.0084737yx12x30= 3d or up to 6th level

> > > Mer/Ven/Sat/Jup/Mer/

> > > > > Rah=

> > > > > > > > 0.0084737(18/120)x12x30= 11 hours and so on. This

> simple

> > > > > > > rathematics

> > > > > > > > will give the same durations of Bhukti, Anthara,

> > Sukshama

> > > > and

> > > > > so

> > > > > > on

> > > > > > > > in any dasa duration table, KSK Readers, KP

> Emphemeris,

> > > > Lahiri

> > > > > > > > Emphemeris, KAS SW, any astrology text book of J. N.

> > > Bhasin,

> > > > > > > James

> > > > > > > > T. Braha, David Frawley, Hart de Foue & Robert

> Svoboda,

> > > B.V.

> > > > > > > Raman,

> > > > > > > > All India Astrological Services etc. If anything

> > different

> > > > > from

> > > > > > > this

> > > > > > > > simple calculations, there is an error for

correction

> > not

> > > > for

> > > > > > > > discussion. In other words, all tables should be the

> > same.

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > Note: Suryanarain Rao: Strijataka or Female

Horoscopy,

> > > 1964,

> > > > p

> > > > > > 154

> > > > > > > >

> > > > >

> > http://www.sulekha.com/content/epress/samples/EB_RAMAN_015_S.pdf

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > Regards,

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > tw

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > --- In

> > > , " ashsam73 "

> > > > > > > > wrote:

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > Dear Amitabh, TW and List Members,

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > Its post like these that causes that would cause

any

> > > > > Moderator

> > > > > > > > Worry.

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > This is a KAS list, and as per KAS we do not use

> > levels

> > > > > below

> > > > > > MD

> > > > > > > > and

> > > > > > > > > AD. MD = Mahadashsa and AD = Antar Dashsa. Period.

> > After

> > > > > > that

> > > > > > > > to

> > > > > > > > > narrow it down we use sectors and then suns

transit

> to

> > > > > narrow

> > > > > > it

> > > > > > > > > down to within 13 days of the event.

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > We also use Krushnas Ayanamsa on this list.

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > Yes, in a quiz, people are free to use any system,

> and

> > > if

> > > > > > their

> > > > > > > > > answer is correct, they maybe requested to explain

> the

> > > > > method

> > > > > > > they

> > > > > > > > > have used, thereby respecting all.

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > At the same time, we all must be cognescant of the

> > fact

> > > > that

> > > > > > > this

> > > > > > > > is

> > > > > > > > > a KAS list where the methodology and techniques as

> > > taught

> > > > by

> > > > > > > > > Krushanji can be practiced and learnt.

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > So please let us stick to KAS on this list. I am

> sure

> > > > there

> > > > > > are

> > > > > > > > > many who know a myraid of techiques to solve a

chart

> > so

> > > if

> > > > u

> > > > > > are

> > > > > > > > > learning KAS then by all means u can verify

results

> > off

> > > > list.

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > Going forward please let us stick to KAS on this

> list.

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > Thanks for your co-operation.

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > Cheers !!!

> > > > > > > > > Ash

> > > > > > > > > (Wearing my Moderator Cap).

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > --- In

> > > , " Amitabh

> > > > > > > > Choudhury "

> > > > > > > > > wrote:

> > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > Hello everybody

> > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > I was reading through contents on a website and

> > noted

> > > > that

> > > > > > it

> > > > > > > > > meantioned

> > > > > > > > > > " Bhukti " and " antardasa " separately(i.e.

> > > > > > > > > > MD - Bhukti - antardasa

> > > > > > > > > > MERC MERC SATN

> > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > This confused me. Gosh if Antardasa and bhukti

are

> > > > indeed

> > > > > > > > > different then

> > > > > > > > > > back to the primary school for me:)

> > > > > > > > > > Could somebody comment about the difference

> between

> > > > bhukti

> > > > > > and

> > > > > > > > > antardasa?

> > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > regards,

> > > > > > > > > > Amitabh.

> > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been

> removed]

> > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > >

> > > > > >

April 23, 2006

Hello members-

Guess I will drop my idea about going back to the primary school and

continue with the KAS school.

Sateesh- Thanks for the information. The points mentioned in your mail gave

me the information missing in my knowledgebase.

Ash- I am in the KAS school now. Any further search about Vimsottari Dasa

(or other school of thoughts) is gonna be my own search.

TW- thanks for the information about Vimsottari Dasa. I very much appreciate

your efforts.

Other members, whose mailbox was getting filled with mails regarding the

above mentioned subject, thanks for bearing with the conversation.

My query is closed now.

Thanks.

regards,

Amitabh.

On 4/23/06, tw853 <tw853 wrote:

>

> Dear Ash,

>

> Same to me.

>

> > > > > > > I am sure you must be aware that there are school of

> > > thought

> > > > > > that use Vinshottari dashsa starting from Sun, From moon,

> > from

> > > > > lagna

> > > > > > etc etc etc.

>

> Regards,

>

> tw

>

> , " ashsam73 "

> <ashsam73 wrote:

> >

> > Dear TW,

> > I am not interested in such a conversation. You asked for where

> its

> > used and I have showed u and I am sure u must have seen 17

> different

> > ways Vimshottari dashsa can be started on.

> > I do not intend to continue this disucsion further as this is not

> > related to KAS and getting reherotical.

> > Lets get back to KAS please.

> > Thanks,

> > Cheers !!!

> > Ash

> >

> > , " tw853 " <tw853@>

> > wrote:

> > >

> > > Dear Ash,

> > >

> > > This is a showdown of SWs, of which only some are in line with

> > > Parasara's Vimshotarri Dasa guidelines regarding starting dasa.

> > >

> > > My request is about the specific names of schools of thoughts,

> you

> > > mentioned in general, that are practically using Vimshotarri

> Dasa

> > > starting from other than Moon.

> > >

> > > Please names of schools in practice not in theory.

> > >

> > > Thanks and regards,

> > >

> > > tw

> > >

> > > , " ashsam73 "

> > > <ashsam73@> wrote:

> > > >

> > > > Dear TW,

> > > > Kindly Check JHL. In that visit the Dashas, Nakshatra Dasha

> and

> > > > Click on options. You will see that you can start

> Visnshottari

> > > > dashsa from 17 different starting point.

> > > > Cheers !!!

> > > > Ash

> > > >

> > > > , " tw853 "

> > <tw853@>

> > > > wrote:

> > > > >

> > > > > Dear Ash,

> > > > >

> > > > > For general knowledge could you kindly mention specific

> > schools

> > > of

> > > > > thought practiaclly using Vinshottari dashsa starting from

> > other

> > > > > than moon which is easy now a days very easywith the help of

> > > SWs.

> > > > >

> > > > > Thanks and regards,

> > > > >

> > > > > tw

> > > > >

> > > > > , " tw853 "

> > > <tw853@>

> > > > > wrote:

> > > > > >

> > > > > > , Ash

> > > <ashsam73@>

> > > > > > wrote:

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > Dear TW,

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > I am sure you must be aware that there are school of

> > > thought

> > > > > > that use Vinshottari dashsa starting from Sun, From moon,

> > from

> > > > > lagna

> > > > > > etc etc etc.

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > As per KAS we are using Vinshottari dashsa starting

> only

> > > > from

> > > > > > Moon.

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > I hope its clear.

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > I hope its also clear that we are not using sub-sub

> > > > divisions

> > > > > > and the naming conventions that we are using here on this

> > list.

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > Going forward that will not be a confusion.

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > Yes, one more thing, here we are using the BAV

> > definition

> > > as

> > > > > > given by Varhararmira and not Parasara.

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > My only point is that lets stick to KAS and its

> > technique

> > > > here

> > > > > > on this list so that there are no confusions.

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > Cheers !!!

> > > > > > > Ash

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > tw853 <tw853@> wrote:

> > > > > > > Dear Ash,

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > There is only and the only one Vimsottari Dasa prevented

> > by

> > > > > > > Parasara, Father Hindu Predictive astrology, which can

> not

> > > be

> > > > a

> > > > > > > monopoly by any school of thought. It is and can be

> > devided

> > > to

> > > > > sub

> > > > > > > divivision as much as desired. You're using sub as per

> > > Prasara

> > > > > and

> > > > > > > sub-sub as per your own way of devision. I am not

> > advocating

> > > > to

> > > > > > use

> > > > > > > standard sub-sub division in this forum. What I am

> saying

> > is

> > > > > about

> > > > > > > original division of Prasara's Vimsottari Dasa but not

> > > making

> > > > > > > confusion as you are saying.

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > Regards,

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > tw

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > --- In

> > , " ashsam73 "

> > > > > > > wrote:

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > Dear TW,

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > I do not understand a simple fact. We do not use sub-

> sub

> > > > > > > divisions

> > > > > > > > or sub-sub-sub divisions or even upto a level that

> gives

> > > in

> > > > > > > hours.

> > > > > > > > We also do not use KP Ayanansa or Lahiri here. We are

> > > using

> > > > > > > > Krushnas Ayanamsa only. This is part and parcel of

> this

> > > > > system.

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > Sub-Sub, or Sub-Sub-Sub etc are not used in KAS. We

> are

> > > > using

> > > > > MD

> > > > > > > > and AD and calculations of that u can get from Lesson

> 9.

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > http://krushna.sageasita.com/pdf/lesson09.pdf

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > As per KAS we are timing events using the following.

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > 1) Vinshottari dashsa and only 2 Levels. MD =

> Mahadasha

> > > and

> > > > AD

> > > > > =

> > > > > > > > antar dashsa. (This is what we call it here).

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > 2) Once we find the antar dashsa to narrow it we

> divide

> > > the

> > > > > > antra

> > > > > > > > (AD) into 3 equal sectors.

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > 3) We then find in which sectors the event will fall

> in.

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > 4) After finding the proper sector, we then narrow the

> > > event

> > > > > > down

> > > > > > > to

> > > > > > > > within 13 days using Suns transit over powerful

> planets

> > as

> > > > per

> > > > > > the

> > > > > > > > WS (Ashtakvarg power)

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > From this you can clearly see, that there is no sub-

> sub

> > or

> > > > sub-

> > > > > > sub-

> > > > > > > > sub etc.

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > Such things might be used by other schools of Jyotish

> > > > Shastra

> > > > > > > which

> > > > > > > > is fine as per their systems.

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > This list has been created by Krushaji so that KAS can

> > be

> > > > > > brought

> > > > > > > > forward to world and here KAS learners can learn KAS

> and

> > > how

> > > > > to

> > > > > > > time

> > > > > > > > events using this unique technique.

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > There are many system, schools of thoughts and many

> > > > different

> > > > > > > > approaches and systems and all systems are good and I

> am

> > > > sure

> > > > > if

> > > > > > > > used properly using any systems one can time events

> > > > perfectly.

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > Here on this list, please let us stick to KAS for

> > benefit

> > > > for

> > > > > > > > members so that such confusions do not arise.

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > I hope you understand.

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > Thank you for your co-operation.

> > > > > > > > Cheers !!!

> > > > > > > > Ash

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > --- In

> , " tw853 "

> > > > > > > > wrote:

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > Dear Ash,

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > I'm very sorry for causing you worry by explaining

> sub-

> > > sub

> > > > > > > > division

> > > > > > > > > of Vimsottari Dasa (Parasara's key to

> prognostication)

> > > > > > according

> > > > > > > > the

> > > > > > > > > inventor's allocation of years to each planet as

> > follows:

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > Out of total 120 years shares are given 6y to Sun,

> 10y

> > > > Moon,

> > > > > 7y

> > > > > > > > > Mars, 18y Rahu, 16y Jupiter, 19y Sturn, 17y Mercury,

> > 7y

> > > > Ketu

> > > > > > and

> > > > > > > > 20y

> > > > > > > > > to Venus. These shares hold the same propotion in

> all

> > > > > periods,

> > > > > > > > Dasha,

> > > > > > > > > Bhukti, Anthara, Sookshama and so on (B. SURYANARAIN

> > > RAO,

> > > > > see

> > > > > > > note

> > > > > > > > > below), giving Bhukti= Dasha period (Bhukti /120);

> > > > Anthara=

> > > > > D

> > > > > > > > (B/120)

> > > > > > > > > (Anthara /120); Sukshama= D (B/120) (A/120)

> > > (Sukshama/120)

> > > > > and

> > > > > > > so

> > > > > > > > > on, e.g.. Venus Dasa/ Saturn Bhukti= 20 (19/120)=

> > > > 3.166667=

> > > > > 3y

> > > > > > +

> > > > > > > > > 0.166667x12=3y:2m; Venus Dasa/ Satrun Bhukti/Jupiter

> > > > > Anthara=

> > > > > > 20

> > > > > > > > > (19/120)(16/120)= 0.422222y= 0.422222x12=

> > > 5m:0.066666x30d=

> > > > > > 5m:2d;

> > > > > > > > > Ven/Jup/Rahu/ Sat= 20(16/120)(18/120)(19/120)=

> > > 0.063333yx

> > > > > > 12x30=

> > > > > > > > 23d;

> > > > > > > > > Mer/Ven/Sat/Jup/Mer= 17(20/120)(19/120)(16/120)

> (17/120)

> > =

> > > > > > > > > 0.0084737yx12x30= 3d or up to 6th level

> > > > Mer/Ven/Sat/Jup/Mer/

> > > > > > Rah=

> > > > > > > > > 0.0084737(18/120)x12x30= 11 hours and so on. This

> > simple

> > > > > > > > rathematics

> > > > > > > > > will give the same durations of Bhukti, Anthara,

> > > Sukshama

> > > > > and

> > > > > > so

> > > > > > > on

> > > > > > > > > in any dasa duration table, KSK Readers, KP

> > Emphemeris,

> > > > > Lahiri

> > > > > > > > > Emphemeris, KAS SW, any astrology text book of J. N.

> > > > Bhasin,

> > > > > > > > James

> > > > > > > > > T. Braha, David Frawley, Hart de Foue & Robert

> > Svoboda,

> > > > B.V.

> > > > > > > > Raman,

> > > > > > > > > All India Astrological Services etc. If anything

> > > different

> > > > > > from

> > > > > > > > this

> > > > > > > > > simple calculations, there is an error for

> correction

> > > not

> > > > > for

> > > > > > > > > discussion. In other words, all tables should be the

> > > same.

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > Note: Suryanarain Rao: Strijataka or Female

> Horoscopy,

> > > > 1964,

> > > > > p

> > > > > > > 154

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > >

> > > http://www.sulekha.com/content/epress/samples/EB_RAMAN_015_S.pdf

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > Regards,

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > tw

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > --- In

> > > > , " ashsam73 "

> > > > > > > > > wrote:

> > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > Dear Amitabh, TW and List Members,

> > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > Its post like these that causes that would cause

> any

> > > > > > Moderator

> > > > > > > > > Worry.

> > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > This is a KAS list, and as per KAS we do not use

> > > levels

> > > > > > below

> > > > > > > MD

> > > > > > > > > and

> > > > > > > > > > AD. MD = Mahadashsa and AD = Antar Dashsa. Period.

> > > After

> > > > > > > that

> > > > > > > > > to

> > > > > > > > > > narrow it down we use sectors and then suns

> transit

> > to

> > > > > > narrow

> > > > > > > it

> > > > > > > > > > down to within 13 days of the event.

> > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > We also use Krushnas Ayanamsa on this list.

> > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > Yes, in a quiz, people are free to use any system,

> > and

> > > > if

> > > > > > > their

> > > > > > > > > > answer is correct, they maybe requested to explain

> > the

> > > > > > method

> > > > > > > > they

> > > > > > > > > > have used, thereby respecting all.

> > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > At the same time, we all must be cognescant of the

> > > fact

> > > > > that

> > > > > > > > this

> > > > > > > > > is

> > > > > > > > > > a KAS list where the methodology and techniques as

> > > > taught

> > > > > by

> > > > > > > > > > Krushanji can be practiced and learnt.

> > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > So please let us stick to KAS on this list. I am

> > sure

> > > > > there

> > > > > > > are

> > > > > > > > > > many who know a myraid of techiques to solve a

> chart

> > > so

> > > > if

> > > > > u

> > > > > > > are

> > > > > > > > > > learning KAS then by all means u can verify

> results

> > > off

> > > > > list.

> > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > Going forward please let us stick to KAS on this

> > list.

> > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > Thanks for your co-operation.

> > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > Cheers !!!

> > > > > > > > > > Ash

> > > > > > > > > > (Wearing my Moderator Cap).

> > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > --- In

> > > > , " Amitabh

> > > > > > > > > Choudhury "

> > > > > > > > > > wrote:

> > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > Hello everybody

> > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > I was reading through contents on a website and

> > > noted

> > > > > that

> > > > > > > it

> > > > > > > > > > meantioned

> > > > > > > > > > > " Bhukti " and " antardasa " separately(i.e.

> > > > > > > > > > > MD - Bhukti - antardasa

> > > > > > > > > > > MERC MERC SATN

> > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > This confused me. Gosh if Antardasa and bhukti

> are

> > > > > indeed

> > > > > > > > > > different then

> > > > > > > > > > > back to the primary school for me:)

> > > > > > > > > > > Could somebody comment about the difference

> > between

> > > > > bhukti

> > > > > > > and

> > > > > > > > > > antardasa?

> > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > regards,

> > > > > > > > > > > Amitabh.

> > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been

> > removed]

> > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > >

Query about a very basic point

Recommended Posts

Guest guest

Link to comment

Share on other sites

Guest guest

Link to comment

Share on other sites

Guest guest

Link to comment

Share on other sites

Guest guest

Link to comment

Share on other sites

Guest guest

Link to comment

Share on other sites

Guest guest

Link to comment

Share on other sites

Guest guest

Link to comment

Share on other sites

Guest guest

Link to comment

Share on other sites

Guest guest

Link to comment

Share on other sites

Guest guest

Link to comment

Share on other sites

Guest guest

Link to comment

Share on other sites

Guest guest

Link to comment

Share on other sites

Guest guest

Link to comment

Share on other sites

Guest guest

Link to comment

Share on other sites

Guest guest

Link to comment

Share on other sites

Guest guest

Link to comment

Share on other sites

Join the conversation

Support the Ashram

Join Groups

Top Downloads