Guest guest Posted May 15, 2006 Report Share Posted May 15, 2006 Hi Ash & Group, A basic doubt: In below chart, is saturn's delay there? According to me, Sa's delay is there and unchecked by Jupiter. Sa aspects LoA & LoC (Ju) in rasi and Sa aspects LoB (su) in navamsa. Jupiter does not aspect Sa. There is no nav-pancham yog. 3rd Jan 1977 10:42am Mumbai Male sa delay is of 25.5 yrs in chart above. Is that correct? Thanks & Regards, Manu Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 15, 2006 Report Share Posted May 15, 2006 Dear Manu, I do not have the program to cast the chart at the moment, but yes, there is delay as all 3 lords are affected by Shani in rasi or navamsa. So take the place where Shani is situated. Say Sa is in libra then delay will get over of Shani when Sa comes to 0 deg virgo. Cheers !!! Ash , " Manu Batura " <manubatura wrote: > > Hi Ash & Group, > > A basic doubt: > > In below chart, is saturn's delay there? According to me, Sa's delay > is there and unchecked by Jupiter. Sa aspects LoA & LoC (Ju) in rasi > and Sa aspects LoB (su) in navamsa. Jupiter does not aspect Sa. There > is no nav-pancham yog. > > 3rd Jan 1977 > 10:42am > Mumbai > Male > > sa delay is of 25.5 yrs in chart above. Is that correct? > > Thanks & Regards, > Manu > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 15, 2006 Report Share Posted May 15, 2006 Hi Ash, This chart seems weird to me because the actual date of marriage is 3 months before sa's delay gets over. Maybe I am not doing something right or maybe the chart needs rectification. Please have a look at this chart when you have the worksheet. I would need some help here. Thanks & Regards, Manu , " ashsam73 " <ashsam73 wrote: > > Dear Manu, > > I do not have the program to cast the chart at the moment, but yes, > there is delay as all 3 lords are affected by Shani in rasi or > navamsa. > > So take the place where Shani is situated. Say Sa is in libra then > delay will get over of Shani when Sa comes to 0 deg virgo. > > Cheers !!! > Ash > > , " Manu Batura " > <manubatura@> wrote: > > > > Hi Ash & Group, > > > > A basic doubt: > > > > In below chart, is saturn's delay there? According to me, Sa's > delay > > is there and unchecked by Jupiter. Sa aspects LoA & LoC (Ju) in > rasi > > and Sa aspects LoB (su) in navamsa. Jupiter does not aspect Sa. > There > > is no nav-pancham yog. > > > > 3rd Jan 1977 > > 10:42am > > Mumbai > > Male > > > > sa delay is of 25.5 yrs in chart above. Is that correct? > > > > Thanks & Regards, > > Manu > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 15, 2006 Report Share Posted May 15, 2006 Dear Manu, Ok, I downloaded KAS2006 program and casted teh chart. Manu, Ju is in 10th from Sa. Sa = 5 bindus and Ju = 2. Ju is boss and Sa has to listen to Ju. So Ju will moderate delay here. So Ju/Ju should give marraige. Study 4:10 closely also Manu. Ju is boss of Sa. So sa is a nice worker (5 bindsu) and Ju is a strict boss. So here Sa has to listen to a strict boss. So Ju will check delay of Sa here. Here Ju is not in sign, nav, nak of shani. i.e. study Status of Ju closely. Cheers !!! Ash , " Manu Batura " <manubatura wrote: > > Hi Ash, > > This chart seems weird to me because the actual date of marriage is 3 > months before sa's delay gets over. Maybe I am not doing something > right or maybe the chart needs rectification. Please have a look at > this chart when you have the worksheet. I would need some help here. > > Thanks & Regards, > Manu > > > > > > , " ashsam73 " > <ashsam73@> wrote: > > > > Dear Manu, > > > > I do not have the program to cast the chart at the moment, but yes, > > there is delay as all 3 lords are affected by Shani in rasi or > > navamsa. > > > > So take the place where Shani is situated. Say Sa is in libra then > > delay will get over of Shani when Sa comes to 0 deg virgo. > > > > Cheers !!! > > Ash > > > > , " Manu Batura " > > <manubatura@> wrote: > > > > > > Hi Ash & Group, > > > > > > A basic doubt: > > > > > > In below chart, is saturn's delay there? According to me, Sa's > > delay > > > is there and unchecked by Jupiter. Sa aspects LoA & LoC (Ju) in > > rasi > > > and Sa aspects LoB (su) in navamsa. Jupiter does not aspect Sa. > > There > > > is no nav-pancham yog. > > > > > > 3rd Jan 1977 > > > 10:42am > > > Mumbai > > > Male > > > > > > sa delay is of 25.5 yrs in chart above. Is that correct? > > > > > > Thanks & Regards, > > > Manu > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 15, 2006 Report Share Posted May 15, 2006 Hi Ash, Cool. Thanks a lot. Would the same happen if: 1. ju is with < 4 points and sa points are > ju points (even if not greater than 4). 2. ju is with 4 points and sa points are > ju points and ju is LoD or LoE. 3. Also, if there are other planets with Saturn in its house, then saturn should be the most malefic in the house. Are the above points correct? Thanks & Regards, Manu , " ashsam73 " <ashsam73 wrote: > > Dear Manu, > Ok, I downloaded KAS2006 program and casted teh chart. Manu, Ju is > in 10th from Sa. Sa = 5 bindus and Ju = 2. > Ju is boss and Sa has to listen to Ju. So Ju will moderate delay > here. So Ju/Ju should give marraige. > Study 4:10 closely also Manu. Ju is boss of Sa. So sa is a nice > worker (5 bindsu) and Ju is a strict boss. So here Sa has to listen > to a strict boss. So Ju will check delay of Sa here. Here Ju is not > in sign, nav, nak of shani. i.e. study Status of Ju closely. > Cheers !!! > Ash > > > , " Manu Batura " > <manubatura@> wrote: > > > > Hi Ash, > > > > This chart seems weird to me because the actual date of marriage > is 3 > > months before sa's delay gets over. Maybe I am not doing something > > right or maybe the chart needs rectification. Please have a look at > > this chart when you have the worksheet. I would need some help > here. > > > > Thanks & Regards, > > Manu > > > > > > > > > > > > , " ashsam73 " > > <ashsam73@> wrote: > > > > > > Dear Manu, > > > > > > I do not have the program to cast the chart at the moment, but > yes, > > > there is delay as all 3 lords are affected by Shani in rasi or > > > navamsa. > > > > > > So take the place where Shani is situated. Say Sa is in libra > then > > > delay will get over of Shani when Sa comes to 0 deg virgo. > > > > > > Cheers !!! > > > Ash > > > > > > , " Manu Batura " > > > <manubatura@> wrote: > > > > > > > > Hi Ash & Group, > > > > > > > > A basic doubt: > > > > > > > > In below chart, is saturn's delay there? According to me, Sa's > > > delay > > > > is there and unchecked by Jupiter. Sa aspects LoA & LoC (Ju) > in > > > rasi > > > > and Sa aspects LoB (su) in navamsa. Jupiter does not aspect > Sa. > > > There > > > > is no nav-pancham yog. > > > > > > > > 3rd Jan 1977 > > > > 10:42am > > > > Mumbai > > > > Male > > > > > > > > sa delay is of 25.5 yrs in chart above. Is that correct? > > > > > > > > Thanks & Regards, > > > > Manu > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 15, 2006 Report Share Posted May 15, 2006 Hi Ash, Also, when we say ju checks sa's delay, do we mean sa's delay is completely nullified? or does it just get reduced by a certain amount? Basic questions!!! Thanks & Regards, Manu , " Manu Batura " <manubatura wrote: > > Hi Ash, > > Cool. Thanks a lot. > > Would the same happen if: > > 1. ju is with < 4 points and sa points are > ju points (even if not > greater than 4). > 2. ju is with 4 points and sa points are > ju points and ju is LoD or LoE. > 3. Also, if there are other planets with Saturn in its house, then > saturn should be the most malefic in the house. > > Are the above points correct? > > Thanks & Regards, > Manu > > > > , " ashsam73 " > <ashsam73@> wrote: > > > > Dear Manu, > > Ok, I downloaded KAS2006 program and casted teh chart. Manu, Ju is > > in 10th from Sa. Sa = 5 bindus and Ju = 2. > > Ju is boss and Sa has to listen to Ju. So Ju will moderate delay > > here. So Ju/Ju should give marraige. > > Study 4:10 closely also Manu. Ju is boss of Sa. So sa is a nice > > worker (5 bindsu) and Ju is a strict boss. So here Sa has to listen > > to a strict boss. So Ju will check delay of Sa here. Here Ju is not > > in sign, nav, nak of shani. i.e. study Status of Ju closely. > > Cheers !!! > > Ash > > > > > > , " Manu Batura " > > <manubatura@> wrote: > > > > > > Hi Ash, > > > > > > This chart seems weird to me because the actual date of marriage > > is 3 > > > months before sa's delay gets over. Maybe I am not doing something > > > right or maybe the chart needs rectification. Please have a look at > > > this chart when you have the worksheet. I would need some help > > here. > > > > > > Thanks & Regards, > > > Manu > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > , " ashsam73 " > > > <ashsam73@> wrote: > > > > > > > > Dear Manu, > > > > > > > > I do not have the program to cast the chart at the moment, but > > yes, > > > > there is delay as all 3 lords are affected by Shani in rasi or > > > > navamsa. > > > > > > > > So take the place where Shani is situated. Say Sa is in libra > > then > > > > delay will get over of Shani when Sa comes to 0 deg virgo. > > > > > > > > Cheers !!! > > > > Ash > > > > > > > > , " Manu Batura " > > > > <manubatura@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Hi Ash & Group, > > > > > > > > > > A basic doubt: > > > > > > > > > > In below chart, is saturn's delay there? According to me, Sa's > > > > delay > > > > > is there and unchecked by Jupiter. Sa aspects LoA & LoC (Ju) > > in > > > > rasi > > > > > and Sa aspects LoB (su) in navamsa. Jupiter does not aspect > > Sa. > > > > There > > > > > is no nav-pancham yog. > > > > > > > > > > 3rd Jan 1977 > > > > > 10:42am > > > > > Mumbai > > > > > Male > > > > > > > > > > sa delay is of 25.5 yrs in chart above. Is that correct? > > > > > > > > > > Thanks & Regards, > > > > > Manu > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 15, 2006 Report Share Posted May 15, 2006 Dear Manu, Just apply yourself. In short, Ju must have its say over Sa or control it or aspect it and check it. Sa must be controlled by Ju at the same time Ju must not be in sign sav nak of Sa or libra etc. Just apply yourself. Take Ju and closely study its status. The basic rule is that , If Ju is boss of Sa, it means that Sa has to submit its points to Jupiter and it becomes a subordinate and very powerful Samdhamri so here Sa has to listen to Ju or boss. If Ju is aspecting Shani then its checking it too. Provided Ju is capable of checking delay of Sa. Think over it and let it marinate for a bit. I think u will get it. Cheers !!! Ash , " Manu Batura " <manubatura wrote: > > Hi Ash, > > Cool. Thanks a lot. > > Would the same happen if: > > 1. ju is with < 4 points and sa points are > ju points (even if not > greater than 4). > 2. ju is with 4 points and sa points are > ju points and ju is LoD or LoE. > 3. Also, if there are other planets with Saturn in its house, then > saturn should be the most malefic in the house. > > Are the above points correct? > > Thanks & Regards, > Manu > > > > , " ashsam73 " > <ashsam73@> wrote: > > > > Dear Manu, > > Ok, I downloaded KAS2006 program and casted teh chart. Manu, Ju is > > in 10th from Sa. Sa = 5 bindus and Ju = 2. > > Ju is boss and Sa has to listen to Ju. So Ju will moderate delay > > here. So Ju/Ju should give marraige. > > Study 4:10 closely also Manu. Ju is boss of Sa. So sa is a nice > > worker (5 bindsu) and Ju is a strict boss. So here Sa has to listen > > to a strict boss. So Ju will check delay of Sa here. Here Ju is not > > in sign, nav, nak of shani. i.e. study Status of Ju closely. > > Cheers !!! > > Ash > > > > > > , " Manu Batura " > > <manubatura@> wrote: > > > > > > Hi Ash, > > > > > > This chart seems weird to me because the actual date of marriage > > is 3 > > > months before sa's delay gets over. Maybe I am not doing something > > > right or maybe the chart needs rectification. Please have a look at > > > this chart when you have the worksheet. I would need some help > > here. > > > > > > Thanks & Regards, > > > Manu > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > , " ashsam73 " > > > <ashsam73@> wrote: > > > > > > > > Dear Manu, > > > > > > > > I do not have the program to cast the chart at the moment, but > > yes, > > > > there is delay as all 3 lords are affected by Shani in rasi or > > > > navamsa. > > > > > > > > So take the place where Shani is situated. Say Sa is in libra > > then > > > > delay will get over of Shani when Sa comes to 0 deg virgo. > > > > > > > > Cheers !!! > > > > Ash > > > > > > > > , " Manu Batura " > > > > <manubatura@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Hi Ash & Group, > > > > > > > > > > A basic doubt: > > > > > > > > > > In below chart, is saturn's delay there? According to me, Sa's > > > > delay > > > > > is there and unchecked by Jupiter. Sa aspects LoA & LoC (Ju) > > in > > > > rasi > > > > > and Sa aspects LoB (su) in navamsa. Jupiter does not aspect > > Sa. > > > > There > > > > > is no nav-pancham yog. > > > > > > > > > > 3rd Jan 1977 > > > > > 10:42am > > > > > Mumbai > > > > > Male > > > > > > > > > > sa delay is of 25.5 yrs in chart above. Is that correct? > > > > > > > > > > Thanks & Regards, > > > > > Manu > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 15, 2006 Report Share Posted May 15, 2006 Hi Ash, Placement of sa with LoA of rasi in rasi or navamsa should not be checked for delay. Is that correct? And the same for jupiter? Thanks & Regards, Manu , " Manu Batura " <manubatura wrote: > > Hi Ash, > > Also, when we say ju checks sa's delay, do we mean sa's delay is > completely nullified? or does it just get reduced by a certain amount? > Basic questions!!! > > Thanks & Regards, > Manu > > > , " Manu Batura " > <manubatura@> wrote: > > > > Hi Ash, > > > > Cool. Thanks a lot. > > > > Would the same happen if: > > > > 1. ju is with < 4 points and sa points are > ju points (even if not > > greater than 4). > > 2. ju is with 4 points and sa points are > ju points and ju is LoD > or LoE. > > 3. Also, if there are other planets with Saturn in its house, then > > saturn should be the most malefic in the house. > > > > Are the above points correct? > > > > Thanks & Regards, > > Manu > > > > > > > > , " ashsam73 " > > <ashsam73@> wrote: > > > > > > Dear Manu, > > > Ok, I downloaded KAS2006 program and casted teh chart. Manu, Ju is > > > in 10th from Sa. Sa = 5 bindus and Ju = 2. > > > Ju is boss and Sa has to listen to Ju. So Ju will moderate delay > > > here. So Ju/Ju should give marraige. > > > Study 4:10 closely also Manu. Ju is boss of Sa. So sa is a nice > > > worker (5 bindsu) and Ju is a strict boss. So here Sa has to listen > > > to a strict boss. So Ju will check delay of Sa here. Here Ju is not > > > in sign, nav, nak of shani. i.e. study Status of Ju closely. > > > Cheers !!! > > > Ash > > > > > > > > > , " Manu Batura " > > > <manubatura@> wrote: > > > > > > > > Hi Ash, > > > > > > > > This chart seems weird to me because the actual date of marriage > > > is 3 > > > > months before sa's delay gets over. Maybe I am not doing something > > > > right or maybe the chart needs rectification. Please have a look at > > > > this chart when you have the worksheet. I would need some help > > > here. > > > > > > > > Thanks & Regards, > > > > Manu > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > , " ashsam73 " > > > > <ashsam73@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Dear Manu, > > > > > > > > > > I do not have the program to cast the chart at the moment, but > > > yes, > > > > > there is delay as all 3 lords are affected by Shani in rasi or > > > > > navamsa. > > > > > > > > > > So take the place where Shani is situated. Say Sa is in libra > > > then > > > > > delay will get over of Shani when Sa comes to 0 deg virgo. > > > > > > > > > > Cheers !!! > > > > > Ash > > > > > > > > > > , " Manu Batura " > > > > > <manubatura@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi Ash & Group, > > > > > > > > > > > > A basic doubt: > > > > > > > > > > > > In below chart, is saturn's delay there? According to me, Sa's > > > > > delay > > > > > > is there and unchecked by Jupiter. Sa aspects LoA & LoC (Ju) > > > in > > > > > rasi > > > > > > and Sa aspects LoB (su) in navamsa. Jupiter does not aspect > > > Sa. > > > > > There > > > > > > is no nav-pancham yog. > > > > > > > > > > > > 3rd Jan 1977 > > > > > > 10:42am > > > > > > Mumbai > > > > > > Male > > > > > > > > > > > > sa delay is of 25.5 yrs in chart above. Is that correct? > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks & Regards, > > > > > > Manu > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 15, 2006 Report Share Posted May 15, 2006 Thanks Ash. I will try. Regards, Manu , " ashsam73 " <ashsam73 wrote: > > Dear Manu, > Just apply yourself. In short, Ju must have its say over Sa or > control it or aspect it and check it. Sa must be controlled by Ju > at the same time Ju must not be in sign sav nak of Sa or libra etc. > Just apply yourself. Take Ju and closely study its status. > The basic rule is that , If Ju is boss of Sa, it means that Sa has > to submit its points to Jupiter and it becomes a subordinate and > very powerful Samdhamri so here Sa has to listen to Ju or boss. If > Ju is aspecting Shani then its checking it too. Provided Ju is > capable of checking delay of Sa. > Think over it and let it marinate for a bit. I think u will get > it. > Cheers !!! > Ash > > , " Manu Batura " > <manubatura@> wrote: > > > > Hi Ash, > > > > Cool. Thanks a lot. > > > > Would the same happen if: > > > > 1. ju is with < 4 points and sa points are > ju points (even if not > > greater than 4). > > 2. ju is with 4 points and sa points are > ju points and ju is LoD > or LoE. > > 3. Also, if there are other planets with Saturn in its house, then > > saturn should be the most malefic in the house. > > > > Are the above points correct? > > > > Thanks & Regards, > > Manu > > > > > > > > , " ashsam73 " > > <ashsam73@> wrote: > > > > > > Dear Manu, > > > Ok, I downloaded KAS2006 program and casted teh chart. Manu, Ju > is > > > in 10th from Sa. Sa = 5 bindus and Ju = 2. > > > Ju is boss and Sa has to listen to Ju. So Ju will moderate > delay > > > here. So Ju/Ju should give marraige. > > > Study 4:10 closely also Manu. Ju is boss of Sa. So sa is a > nice > > > worker (5 bindsu) and Ju is a strict boss. So here Sa has to > listen > > > to a strict boss. So Ju will check delay of Sa here. Here Ju is > not > > > in sign, nav, nak of shani. i.e. study Status of Ju closely. > > > Cheers !!! > > > Ash > > > > > > > > > , " Manu Batura " > > > <manubatura@> wrote: > > > > > > > > Hi Ash, > > > > > > > > This chart seems weird to me because the actual date of > marriage > > > is 3 > > > > months before sa's delay gets over. Maybe I am not doing > something > > > > right or maybe the chart needs rectification. Please have a > look at > > > > this chart when you have the worksheet. I would need some help > > > here. > > > > > > > > Thanks & Regards, > > > > Manu > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > , " ashsam73 " > > > > <ashsam73@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Dear Manu, > > > > > > > > > > I do not have the program to cast the chart at the moment, > but > > > yes, > > > > > there is delay as all 3 lords are affected by Shani in rasi > or > > > > > navamsa. > > > > > > > > > > So take the place where Shani is situated. Say Sa is in > libra > > > then > > > > > delay will get over of Shani when Sa comes to 0 deg virgo. > > > > > > > > > > Cheers !!! > > > > > Ash > > > > > > > > > > , " Manu > Batura " > > > > > <manubatura@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi Ash & Group, > > > > > > > > > > > > A basic doubt: > > > > > > > > > > > > In below chart, is saturn's delay there? According to me, > Sa's > > > > > delay > > > > > > is there and unchecked by Jupiter. Sa aspects LoA & LoC > (Ju) > > > in > > > > > rasi > > > > > > and Sa aspects LoB (su) in navamsa. Jupiter does not > aspect > > > Sa. > > > > > There > > > > > > is no nav-pancham yog. > > > > > > > > > > > > 3rd Jan 1977 > > > > > > 10:42am > > > > > > Mumbai > > > > > > Male > > > > > > > > > > > > sa delay is of 25.5 yrs in chart above. Is that correct? > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks & Regards, > > > > > > Manu > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 15, 2006 Report Share Posted May 15, 2006 Hi Ash, I was wondering, there is Jupiter delay too in this chart. Ju aspects house B and is LoA. So, shouldn't that be included too? Thanks & regards, Manu , " ashsam73 " <ashsam73 wrote: > > Dear Manu, > Ok, I downloaded KAS2006 program and casted teh chart. Manu, Ju is > in 10th from Sa. Sa = 5 bindus and Ju = 2. > Ju is boss and Sa has to listen to Ju. So Ju will moderate delay > here. So Ju/Ju should give marraige. > Study 4:10 closely also Manu. Ju is boss of Sa. So sa is a nice > worker (5 bindsu) and Ju is a strict boss. So here Sa has to listen > to a strict boss. So Ju will check delay of Sa here. Here Ju is not > in sign, nav, nak of shani. i.e. study Status of Ju closely. > Cheers !!! > Ash > > > , " Manu Batura " > <manubatura@> wrote: > > > > Hi Ash, > > > > This chart seems weird to me because the actual date of marriage > is 3 > > months before sa's delay gets over. Maybe I am not doing something > > right or maybe the chart needs rectification. Please have a look at > > this chart when you have the worksheet. I would need some help > here. > > > > Thanks & Regards, > > Manu > > > > > > > > > > > > , " ashsam73 " > > <ashsam73@> wrote: > > > > > > Dear Manu, > > > > > > I do not have the program to cast the chart at the moment, but > yes, > > > there is delay as all 3 lords are affected by Shani in rasi or > > > navamsa. > > > > > > So take the place where Shani is situated. Say Sa is in libra > then > > > delay will get over of Shani when Sa comes to 0 deg virgo. > > > > > > Cheers !!! > > > Ash > > > > > > , " Manu Batura " > > > <manubatura@> wrote: > > > > > > > > Hi Ash & Group, > > > > > > > > A basic doubt: > > > > > > > > In below chart, is saturn's delay there? According to me, Sa's > > > delay > > > > is there and unchecked by Jupiter. Sa aspects LoA & LoC (Ju) > in > > > rasi > > > > and Sa aspects LoB (su) in navamsa. Jupiter does not aspect > Sa. > > > There > > > > is no nav-pancham yog. > > > > > > > > 3rd Jan 1977 > > > > 10:42am > > > > Mumbai > > > > Male > > > > > > > > sa delay is of 25.5 yrs in chart above. Is that correct? > > > > > > > > Thanks & Regards, > > > > Manu > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 15, 2006 Report Share Posted May 15, 2006 Dear Manu, I dont know if u got u properly. LEts take LEo lagna. Me is 2nd and 11th lord. If Sa conjoins Mercury in Navamsa measn there will be full delay. Atleast that is my understanding. Cheers !!! Ash , " Manu Batura " <manubatura wrote: > > Hi Ash, > > Placement of sa with LoA of rasi in rasi or navamsa should not be > checked for delay. Is that correct? > > And the same for jupiter? > > Thanks & Regards, > Manu > > > , " Manu Batura " > <manubatura@> wrote: > > > > Hi Ash, > > > > Also, when we say ju checks sa's delay, do we mean sa's delay is > > completely nullified? or does it just get reduced by a certain amount? > > Basic questions!!! > > > > Thanks & Regards, > > Manu > > > > > > , " Manu Batura " > > <manubatura@> wrote: > > > > > > Hi Ash, > > > > > > Cool. Thanks a lot. > > > > > > Would the same happen if: > > > > > > 1. ju is with < 4 points and sa points are > ju points (even if not > > > greater than 4). > > > 2. ju is with 4 points and sa points are > ju points and ju is LoD > > or LoE. > > > 3. Also, if there are other planets with Saturn in its house, then > > > saturn should be the most malefic in the house. > > > > > > Are the above points correct? > > > > > > Thanks & Regards, > > > Manu > > > > > > > > > > > > , " ashsam73 " > > > <ashsam73@> wrote: > > > > > > > > Dear Manu, > > > > Ok, I downloaded KAS2006 program and casted teh chart. Manu, Ju is > > > > in 10th from Sa. Sa = 5 bindus and Ju = 2. > > > > Ju is boss and Sa has to listen to Ju. So Ju will moderate delay > > > > here. So Ju/Ju should give marraige. > > > > Study 4:10 closely also Manu. Ju is boss of Sa. So sa is a nice > > > > worker (5 bindsu) and Ju is a strict boss. So here Sa has to > listen > > > > to a strict boss. So Ju will check delay of Sa here. Here Ju is > not > > > > in sign, nav, nak of shani. i.e. study Status of Ju closely. > > > > Cheers !!! > > > > Ash > > > > > > > > > > > > , " Manu Batura " > > > > <manubatura@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Hi Ash, > > > > > > > > > > This chart seems weird to me because the actual date of marriage > > > > is 3 > > > > > months before sa's delay gets over. Maybe I am not doing something > > > > > right or maybe the chart needs rectification. Please have a > look at > > > > > this chart when you have the worksheet. I would need some help > > > > here. > > > > > > > > > > Thanks & Regards, > > > > > Manu > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > , " ashsam73 " > > > > > <ashsam73@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Manu, > > > > > > > > > > > > I do not have the program to cast the chart at the moment, but > > > > yes, > > > > > > there is delay as all 3 lords are affected by Shani in rasi or > > > > > > navamsa. > > > > > > > > > > > > So take the place where Shani is situated. Say Sa is in libra > > > > then > > > > > > delay will get over of Shani when Sa comes to 0 deg virgo. > > > > > > > > > > > > Cheers !!! > > > > > > Ash > > > > > > > > > > > > , " Manu Batura " > > > > > > <manubatura@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi Ash & Group, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > A basic doubt: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > In below chart, is saturn's delay there? According to me, > Sa's > > > > > > delay > > > > > > > is there and unchecked by Jupiter. Sa aspects LoA & LoC (Ju) > > > > in > > > > > > rasi > > > > > > > and Sa aspects LoB (su) in navamsa. Jupiter does not aspect > > > > Sa. > > > > > > There > > > > > > > is no nav-pancham yog. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 3rd Jan 1977 > > > > > > > 10:42am > > > > > > > Mumbai > > > > > > > Male > > > > > > > > > > > > > > sa delay is of 25.5 yrs in chart above. Is that correct? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks & Regards, > > > > > > > Manu > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.