another complicated chart--ALL--ignore

[Guest guest]

Dear All,

 

Please ignore the chart I posted. After telling the native to check

the birth time again, he is not sure now, as I didnt think the

marriage could be in the antra I was timing it. So its better not to

do chart which we are not sure of the birth time. sorry to

unnecessarily waste time.

 

--Manoshi , " Manoshi

Chatterjee " <khallopapa wrote:

>

> Dear Manu,

>

> How did you come to the conclusion? Could you please give an

> explanation? yThe native got married in 2003 April, which is in

line

> with your prediction? WOW...

>

>

> awaiting explanation

>

> --Manoshi

>

> , " Manu Batura "

> <manubatura@> wrote:

> >

> > Hi Manoshi,

> >

> > My attempt assuming rectified birth time is:

> >

> > Approx 1 -> Ke antra (5/2002 - 7/2003)

> > Approx 2 -> 1st sector (5/2002 - 10/2002)

> > Approx 3 -> su over mo/me (8/3/2002 - 8/16/2002)

> >

> > Thanks & Regards,

> > Manu

> >

> >

> >

> > , " Manoshi

> Chatterjee "

> > <khallopapa@> wrote:

> > >

> > > Dear Ash, Sri Rayadu, Bala, Manu, Ramesh, and other memebers,

> > >

> > > I came across this chart and found complicated. The lagna is

in

> > > border but i dont think the chart needs rectification as the

> native

> > > is married before the delay period is over (if there is a

> delay).

> > >

> > > 1)I would like to know based on all the combinations etc in

the

> > > chart, when might have the native got married. (I couldnt time

> it)

> > >

> > > 2)How must be the married life?

> > >

> > > 3)Child birth

> > >

> > > Please dont take it as a quiz, but after I get responses, we

can

> > > discuss on this chart.

> > >

> > > Birth details

> > >

> > > female

> > > 16Oct1978

> > >

> > > 19H 30M

> > >

> > > Amritsar, India

> > >

> > > 31N35

> > >

> > > 74E53

> > >

> > > thanks

> > > Manoshi

> > >

> >

>