Guest guest Posted July 20, 2006 Report Share Posted July 20, 2006 Dear All and Krushna ji, The lady is divorced...which I could not see from the chart. I would like to have more opinions on this. Planet Degrees As 14 Vi 43 Su 27 Aq 18 Mo 10 Ta 20 Ma 25 Sg 54 MeR 3 Pi 25 Ju 10 Cp 31 Ve 19 Aq 40 Sa 21 Ta 38 Ra 21 Sg 2 Ke 21 Ge 2 Marriage timing: Saturn is causing delay and jupiter is aspecting saturn. Jupiter is in Saturn sign so will it reduce dalay? lets s ee other qualities of jupiter too. It is in moon nakshatra, mars navamsa, aspected by 6th lord saturn. She got married in 1994 november (if you take delay moderation by jupiter in consideration, marriage time is right). Yes Ramesh, it was a love marriage...against her parents wishes (as people said), though the parents disagree that they were against it. child was born in 1996 june (saturn has high points for 11th house, 5th house points are low indicating a girl child). separation in year 2000 legal separation (divorce) in 2006 March Acquired property(house) in 2005 April (sun antra with high points for 4th) has done masters in personal management and also English. She is working. Is in India. First job sometime in 1996-97. How do we judge this chart? --Manoshi , ramesh mishra <aarceemastro2002 wrote: > > Hello Manoshi, Namaskar, > The lagna of this native is rising with 14 Vi 43. The Su to Ve distance is OK < 43 deg but Ve is ahead of Su. Therefore Ve is weak and combust. > NK and FK both is Ve who has gone to 6th house and aspected by 6th lord Sa, > it seems that native is not interested in material enjoyment. > There is one zero in SAV chart contributed by Su in 8th house. > Me/Ve 2/12 and 6/8 in navamsa, Me/Ju 3/11 and 5/9 . Su/Sa 4/10 and 2/12, Ma/Ve 3/11 and 5/9 > Ve has gone to the navamsa of Ju who is LoD for 7th > There is full delay caused by Sa, though delay is moderated by the aspect of Ju on Sa it is cancelled due to presence of Ju in Sa sign. Therefore delay will be over when Sa enters aries sometime in Apr last week of 1998. That time native was passing through Me antara in Ra main period .Next antara is followed by Ke. Ke is SD to Me and Me is weak for 7th house hence elminated.Next comes the antara of Ve . Ve is 2nd lord and aspected by Sa , so looses its quality. Therefore Ve antara is also eliminated. Su antara is running through 26 Jun 2004 till 20 May 2005. Sun is LoE and has 17 points for 7th house in WS. Su might have given marriage in its third sector in between Feb/2005 to May/2005. > Most probably in the month of Mar 2005 when Su was transiting in Pisces. > I do not know what is the fact. Manoshi please guide me if I am wrong anywhere. > This chart is showing love marriage. I guess native might have gone against the will of his/her father and married. > The native has good relationship with his/her spouse and I do not find any multiple relationship. > There may be some insatisfactory relationship between them due to the aspect of Sa on both the luminaries and karak Ve. > I may be totally wrong also but the fact may be highlighted by Manoshi. > Thanks and regards. > Ramesh Mishra > > Manoshi Chatterjee khallopapa wrote: > Dear All, > > I got this chart yesterday. I have to confirm the marriage date yet. > Chart seems to be right as I matched a few events. I want to discuss > about what you can predict about the married life, what about > multilple relationships/marriage, if anything can be seen from the > chart. I would like to request Ash as well to give his inputs for > learning purpose. > > 10th March 1973 > 19:57 > Bombay > > I will post about what I could see and what I couldnt in a day or > two. > > thanks > Manoshi > Find out what India is talking about on Answers India. > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 20, 2006 Report Share Posted July 20, 2006 Dear Manoshi, I did say in my mail, that if the chart was female more chances of marriage in Ju antra which is the exact antra she got married in. /message/12365 Manoshi, here Ju is in capricorn so it can't check the delay of Sa. However, in this case, I had selected Ju antra based on 2 points one that the chart was that of a female and secondly lagna and 9th lord of navamsa are in 5:9 so there is blessing which might reduce delay. Cheers !!! Ash , " Manoshi Chatterjee " <khallopapa wrote: > > > Dear All and Krushna ji, > > The lady is divorced...which I could not see from the chart. I would > like to have more opinions on this. > > Planet Degrees > As 14 Vi 43 > Su 27 Aq 18 > Mo 10 Ta 20 > Ma 25 Sg 54 > MeR 3 Pi 25 > Ju 10 Cp 31 > Ve 19 Aq 40 > Sa 21 Ta 38 > Ra 21 Sg 2 > Ke 21 Ge 2 > > Marriage timing: > > Saturn is causing delay and jupiter is aspecting saturn. Jupiter is in > Saturn sign so will it reduce dalay? lets s ee other qualities of > jupiter too. It is in moon nakshatra, mars navamsa, aspected by 6th lord > saturn. > > She got married in 1994 november (if you take delay moderation by > jupiter in consideration, marriage time is right). Yes Ramesh, it was a > love marriage...against her parents wishes (as people said), though the > parents disagree that they were against it. > > child was born in 1996 june (saturn has high points for 11th house, 5th > house points are low indicating a girl child). > > separation in year 2000 > > legal separation (divorce) in 2006 March > > Acquired property(house) in 2005 April (sun antra with high points for > 4th) > > has done masters in personal management and also English. She is > working. Is in India. First job sometime in 1996-97. > > How do we judge this chart? > > > --Manoshi , ramesh mishra > <aarceemastro2002@> wrote: > > > > Hello Manoshi, Namaskar, > > The lagna of this native is rising with 14 Vi 43. The Su to Ve > distance is OK < 43 deg but Ve is ahead of Su. Therefore Ve is weak and > combust. > > NK and FK both is Ve who has gone to 6th house and aspected by 6th > lord Sa, > > it seems that native is not interested in material enjoyment. > > There is one zero in SAV chart contributed by Su in 8th house. > > Me/Ve 2/12 and 6/8 in navamsa, Me/Ju 3/11 and 5/9 . Su/Sa 4/10 and > 2/12, Ma/Ve 3/11 and 5/9 > > Ve has gone to the navamsa of Ju who is LoD for 7th > > There is full delay caused by Sa, though delay is moderated by the > aspect of Ju on Sa it is cancelled due to presence of Ju in Sa sign. > Therefore delay will be over when Sa enters aries sometime in Apr last > week of 1998. That time native was passing through Me antara in Ra main > period .Next antara is followed by Ke. Ke is SD to Me and Me is weak for > 7th house hence elminated.Next comes the antara of Ve . Ve is 2nd lord > and aspected by Sa , so looses its quality. Therefore Ve antara is also > eliminated. Su antara is running through 26 Jun 2004 till 20 May 2005. > Sun is LoE and has 17 points for 7th house in WS. Su might have given > marriage in its third sector in between Feb/2005 to May/2005. > > Most probably in the month of Mar 2005 when Su was transiting in > Pisces. > > I do not know what is the fact. Manoshi please guide me if I am wrong > anywhere. > > This chart is showing love marriage. I guess native might have gone > against the will of his/her father and married. > > The native has good relationship with his/her spouse and I do not find > any multiple relationship. > > There may be some insatisfactory relationship between them due to the > aspect of Sa on both the luminaries and karak Ve. > > I may be totally wrong also but the fact may be highlighted by > Manoshi. > > Thanks and regards. > > Ramesh Mishra > > > > Manoshi Chatterjee khallopapa@ wrote: > > Dear All, > > > > I got this chart yesterday. I have to confirm the marriage date yet. > > Chart seems to be right as I matched a few events. I want to discuss > > about what you can predict about the married life, what about > > multilple relationships/marriage, if anything can be seen from the > > chart. I would like to request Ash as well to give his inputs for > > learning purpose. > > > > 10th March 1973 > > 19:57 > > Bombay > > > > I will post about what I could see and what I couldnt in a day or > > two. > > > > thanks > > Manoshi > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Find out what India is talking about on Answers India. > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 20, 2006 Report Share Posted July 20, 2006 Yes Ash. Congrats! but what if it's jupiter then could you please explain why would it reduce delay in female chart, why not male? Do you find other events matching? like separation, divorce etc. and why? parents are pretty sure about the birth time though. looking forward to your response. --Manoshi , " ashsam73 " <ashsam73 wrote: > > Dear Manoshi, > > I did say in my mail, that if the chart was female more chances of > marriage in Ju antra which is the exact antra she got married in. > > /message/12365 > > Manoshi, here Ju is in capricorn so it can't check the delay of Sa. > However, in this case, I had selected Ju antra based on 2 points one > that the chart was that of a female and secondly lagna and 9th lord > of navamsa are in 5:9 so there is blessing which might reduce delay. > > Cheers !!! > Ash > > > , " Manoshi > Chatterjee " <khallopapa@> wrote: > > > > > > Dear All and Krushna ji, > > > > The lady is divorced...which I could not see from the chart. I > would > > like to have more opinions on this. > > > > Planet Degrees > > As 14 Vi 43 > > Su 27 Aq 18 > > Mo 10 Ta 20 > > Ma 25 Sg 54 > > MeR 3 Pi 25 > > Ju 10 Cp 31 > > Ve 19 Aq 40 > > Sa 21 Ta 38 > > Ra 21 Sg 2 > > Ke 21 Ge 2 > > > > Marriage timing: > > > > Saturn is causing delay and jupiter is aspecting saturn. Jupiter > is in > > Saturn sign so will it reduce dalay? lets s ee other qualities of > > jupiter too. It is in moon nakshatra, mars navamsa, aspected by > 6th lord > > saturn. > > > > She got married in 1994 november (if you take delay moderation by > > jupiter in consideration, marriage time is right). Yes Ramesh, it > was a > > love marriage...against her parents wishes (as people said), > though the > > parents disagree that they were against it. > > > > child was born in 1996 june (saturn has high points for 11th > house, 5th > > house points are low indicating a girl child). > > > > separation in year 2000 > > > > legal separation (divorce) in 2006 March > > > > Acquired property(house) in 2005 April (sun antra with high points > for > > 4th) > > > > has done masters in personal management and also English. She is > > working. Is in India. First job sometime in 1996-97. > > > > How do we judge this chart? > > > > > > --Manoshi > > > > > > > > > > > > > > , ramesh mishra > > <aarceemastro2002@> wrote: > > > > > > Hello Manoshi, Namaskar, > > > The lagna of this native is rising with 14 Vi 43. The Su to Ve > > distance is OK < 43 deg but Ve is ahead of Su. Therefore Ve is > weak and > > combust. > > > NK and FK both is Ve who has gone to 6th house and aspected by > 6th > > lord Sa, > > > it seems that native is not interested in material enjoyment. > > > There is one zero in SAV chart contributed by Su in 8th house. > > > Me/Ve 2/12 and 6/8 in navamsa, Me/Ju 3/11 and 5/9 . Su/Sa 4/10 > and > > 2/12, Ma/Ve 3/11 and 5/9 > > > Ve has gone to the navamsa of Ju who is LoD for 7th > > > There is full delay caused by Sa, though delay is moderated by > the > > aspect of Ju on Sa it is cancelled due to presence of Ju in Sa > sign. > > Therefore delay will be over when Sa enters aries sometime in Apr > last > > week of 1998. That time native was passing through Me antara in Ra > main > > period .Next antara is followed by Ke. Ke is SD to Me and Me is > weak for > > 7th house hence elminated.Next comes the antara of Ve . Ve is 2nd > lord > > and aspected by Sa , so looses its quality. Therefore Ve antara is > also > > eliminated. Su antara is running through 26 Jun 2004 till 20 May > 2005. > > Sun is LoE and has 17 points for 7th house in WS. Su might have > given > > marriage in its third sector in between Feb/2005 to May/2005. > > > Most probably in the month of Mar 2005 when Su was transiting in > > Pisces. > > > I do not know what is the fact. Manoshi please guide me if I am > wrong > > anywhere. > > > This chart is showing love marriage. I guess native might have > gone > > against the will of his/her father and married. > > > The native has good relationship with his/her spouse and I do > not find > > any multiple relationship. > > > There may be some insatisfactory relationship between them due > to the > > aspect of Sa on both the luminaries and karak Ve. > > > I may be totally wrong also but the fact may be highlighted by > > Manoshi. > > > Thanks and regards. > > > Ramesh Mishra > > > > > > Manoshi Chatterjee khallopapa@ wrote: > > > Dear All, > > > > > > I got this chart yesterday. I have to confirm the marriage date > yet. > > > Chart seems to be right as I matched a few events. I want to > discuss > > > about what you can predict about the married life, what about > > > multilple relationships/marriage, if anything can be seen from > the > > > chart. I would like to request Ash as well to give his inputs for > > > learning purpose. > > > > > > 10th March 1973 > > > 19:57 > > > Bombay > > > > > > I will post about what I could see and what I couldnt in a day or > > > two. > > > > > > thanks > > > Manoshi > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Find out what India is talking about on Answers India. > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 20, 2006 Report Share Posted July 20, 2006 Manoshi, If possible, please post the birth details of the husband also. Let's look at the compatibility. -Gita , " Manoshi Chatterjee " <khallopapa wrote: > > Yes Ash. Congrats! but what if it's jupiter then could you please > explain why would it reduce delay in female chart, why not male? > > Do you find other events matching? like separation, divorce etc. and > why? parents are pretty sure about the birth time though. > > looking forward to your response. > > --Manoshi > > > , " ashsam73 " > <ashsam73@> wrote: > > > > Dear Manoshi, > > > > I did say in my mail, that if the chart was female more chances of > > marriage in Ju antra which is the exact antra she got married in. > > > > > /message/12365 > > > > Manoshi, here Ju is in capricorn so it can't check the delay of > Sa. > > However, in this case, I had selected Ju antra based on 2 points > one > > that the chart was that of a female and secondly lagna and 9th > lord > > of navamsa are in 5:9 so there is blessing which might reduce > delay. > > > > Cheers !!! > > Ash > > > > > > , " Manoshi > > Chatterjee " <khallopapa@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > Dear All and Krushna ji, > > > > > > The lady is divorced...which I could not see from the chart. I > > would > > > like to have more opinions on this. > > > > > > Planet Degrees > > > As 14 Vi 43 > > > Su 27 Aq 18 > > > Mo 10 Ta 20 > > > Ma 25 Sg 54 > > > MeR 3 Pi 25 > > > Ju 10 Cp 31 > > > Ve 19 Aq 40 > > > Sa 21 Ta 38 > > > Ra 21 Sg 2 > > > Ke 21 Ge 2 > > > > > > Marriage timing: > > > > > > Saturn is causing delay and jupiter is aspecting saturn. Jupiter > > is in > > > Saturn sign so will it reduce dalay? lets s ee other qualities of > > > jupiter too. It is in moon nakshatra, mars navamsa, aspected by > > 6th lord > > > saturn. > > > > > > She got married in 1994 november (if you take delay moderation > by > > > jupiter in consideration, marriage time is right). Yes Ramesh, > it > > was a > > > love marriage...against her parents wishes (as people said), > > though the > > > parents disagree that they were against it. > > > > > > child was born in 1996 june (saturn has high points for 11th > > house, 5th > > > house points are low indicating a girl child). > > > > > > separation in year 2000 > > > > > > legal separation (divorce) in 2006 March > > > > > > Acquired property(house) in 2005 April (sun antra with high > points > > for > > > 4th) > > > > > > has done masters in personal management and also English. She is > > > working. Is in India. First job sometime in 1996-97. > > > > > > How do we judge this chart? > > > > > > > > > --Manoshi > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > , ramesh mishra > > > <aarceemastro2002@> wrote: > > > > > > > > Hello Manoshi, Namaskar, > > > > The lagna of this native is rising with 14 Vi 43. The Su to Ve > > > distance is OK < 43 deg but Ve is ahead of Su. Therefore Ve is > > weak and > > > combust. > > > > NK and FK both is Ve who has gone to 6th house and aspected by > > 6th > > > lord Sa, > > > > it seems that native is not interested in material enjoyment. > > > > There is one zero in SAV chart contributed by Su in 8th house. > > > > Me/Ve 2/12 and 6/8 in navamsa, Me/Ju 3/11 and 5/9 . Su/Sa 4/10 > > and > > > 2/12, Ma/Ve 3/11 and 5/9 > > > > Ve has gone to the navamsa of Ju who is LoD for 7th > > > > There is full delay caused by Sa, though delay is moderated by > > the > > > aspect of Ju on Sa it is cancelled due to presence of Ju in Sa > > sign. > > > Therefore delay will be over when Sa enters aries sometime in > Apr > > last > > > week of 1998. That time native was passing through Me antara in > Ra > > main > > > period .Next antara is followed by Ke. Ke is SD to Me and Me is > > weak for > > > 7th house hence elminated.Next comes the antara of Ve . Ve is > 2nd > > lord > > > and aspected by Sa , so looses its quality. Therefore Ve antara > is > > also > > > eliminated. Su antara is running through 26 Jun 2004 till 20 May > > 2005. > > > Sun is LoE and has 17 points for 7th house in WS. Su might have > > given > > > marriage in its third sector in between Feb/2005 to May/2005. > > > > Most probably in the month of Mar 2005 when Su was transiting > in > > > Pisces. > > > > I do not know what is the fact. Manoshi please guide me if I > am > > wrong > > > anywhere. > > > > This chart is showing love marriage. I guess native might have > > gone > > > against the will of his/her father and married. > > > > The native has good relationship with his/her spouse and I do > > not find > > > any multiple relationship. > > > > There may be some insatisfactory relationship between them due > > to the > > > aspect of Sa on both the luminaries and karak Ve. > > > > I may be totally wrong also but the fact may be highlighted by > > > Manoshi. > > > > Thanks and regards. > > > > Ramesh Mishra > > > > > > > > Manoshi Chatterjee khallopapa@ wrote: > > > > Dear All, > > > > > > > > I got this chart yesterday. I have to confirm the marriage > date > > yet. > > > > Chart seems to be right as I matched a few events. I want to > > discuss > > > > about what you can predict about the married life, what about > > > > multilple relationships/marriage, if anything can be seen from > > the > > > > chart. I would like to request Ash as well to give his inputs > for > > > > learning purpose. > > > > > > > > 10th March 1973 > > > > 19:57 > > > > Bombay > > > > > > > > I will post about what I could see and what I couldnt in a day > or > > > > two. > > > > > > > > thanks > > > > Manoshi > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Find out what India is talking about on Answers India. > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 20, 2006 Report Share Posted July 20, 2006 sorry Gita, I dont have the details of the husband. and I dont think I could get it either. --Manoshi , " kaslearner " <kaslearner wrote: > > Manoshi, > > If possible, please post the birth details of the husband also. > Let's look at the compatibility. > > -Gita > > , " Manoshi > Chatterjee " <khallopapa@> wrote: > > > > Yes Ash. Congrats! but what if it's jupiter then could you please > > explain why would it reduce delay in female chart, why not male? > > > > Do you find other events matching? like separation, divorce etc. > and > > why? parents are pretty sure about the birth time though. > > > > looking forward to your response. > > > > --Manoshi > > > > > > , " ashsam73 " > > <ashsam73@> wrote: > > > > > > Dear Manoshi, > > > > > > I did say in my mail, that if the chart was female more chances > of > > > marriage in Ju antra which is the exact antra she got married in. > > > > > > > > > /message/12365 > > > > > > Manoshi, here Ju is in capricorn so it can't check the delay of > > Sa. > > > However, in this case, I had selected Ju antra based on 2 points > > one > > > that the chart was that of a female and secondly lagna and 9th > > lord > > > of navamsa are in 5:9 so there is blessing which might reduce > > delay. > > > > > > Cheers !!! > > > Ash > > > > > > > > > , " Manoshi > > > Chatterjee " <khallopapa@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear All and Krushna ji, > > > > > > > > The lady is divorced...which I could not see from the chart. I > > > would > > > > like to have more opinions on this. > > > > > > > > Planet Degrees > > > > As 14 Vi 43 > > > > Su 27 Aq 18 > > > > Mo 10 Ta 20 > > > > Ma 25 Sg 54 > > > > MeR 3 Pi 25 > > > > Ju 10 Cp 31 > > > > Ve 19 Aq 40 > > > > Sa 21 Ta 38 > > > > Ra 21 Sg 2 > > > > Ke 21 Ge 2 > > > > > > > > Marriage timing: > > > > > > > > Saturn is causing delay and jupiter is aspecting saturn. > Jupiter > > > is in > > > > Saturn sign so will it reduce dalay? lets s ee other qualities > of > > > > jupiter too. It is in moon nakshatra, mars navamsa, aspected > by > > > 6th lord > > > > saturn. > > > > > > > > She got married in 1994 november (if you take delay > moderation > > by > > > > jupiter in consideration, marriage time is right). Yes Ramesh, > > it > > > was a > > > > love marriage...against her parents wishes (as people said), > > > though the > > > > parents disagree that they were against it. > > > > > > > > child was born in 1996 june (saturn has high points for 11th > > > house, 5th > > > > house points are low indicating a girl child). > > > > > > > > separation in year 2000 > > > > > > > > legal separation (divorce) in 2006 March > > > > > > > > Acquired property(house) in 2005 April (sun antra with high > > points > > > for > > > > 4th) > > > > > > > > has done masters in personal management and also English. She > is > > > > working. Is in India. First job sometime in 1996-97. > > > > > > > > How do we judge this chart? > > > > > > > > > > > > --Manoshi > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > , ramesh mishra > > > > <aarceemastro2002@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Hello Manoshi, Namaskar, > > > > > The lagna of this native is rising with 14 Vi 43. The Su to > Ve > > > > distance is OK < 43 deg but Ve is ahead of Su. Therefore Ve is > > > weak and > > > > combust. > > > > > NK and FK both is Ve who has gone to 6th house and aspected > by > > > 6th > > > > lord Sa, > > > > > it seems that native is not interested in material enjoyment. > > > > > There is one zero in SAV chart contributed by Su in 8th > house. > > > > > Me/Ve 2/12 and 6/8 in navamsa, Me/Ju 3/11 and 5/9 . Su/Sa > 4/10 > > > and > > > > 2/12, Ma/Ve 3/11 and 5/9 > > > > > Ve has gone to the navamsa of Ju who is LoD for 7th > > > > > There is full delay caused by Sa, though delay is moderated > by > > > the > > > > aspect of Ju on Sa it is cancelled due to presence of Ju in Sa > > > sign. > > > > Therefore delay will be over when Sa enters aries sometime in > > Apr > > > last > > > > week of 1998. That time native was passing through Me antara > in > > Ra > > > main > > > > period .Next antara is followed by Ke. Ke is SD to Me and Me > is > > > weak for > > > > 7th house hence elminated.Next comes the antara of Ve . Ve is > > 2nd > > > lord > > > > and aspected by Sa , so looses its quality. Therefore Ve > antara > > is > > > also > > > > eliminated. Su antara is running through 26 Jun 2004 till 20 > May > > > 2005. > > > > Sun is LoE and has 17 points for 7th house in WS. Su might > have > > > given > > > > marriage in its third sector in between Feb/2005 to May/2005. > > > > > Most probably in the month of Mar 2005 when Su was > transiting > > in > > > > Pisces. > > > > > I do not know what is the fact. Manoshi please guide me if I > > am > > > wrong > > > > anywhere. > > > > > This chart is showing love marriage. I guess native might > have > > > gone > > > > against the will of his/her father and married. > > > > > The native has good relationship with his/her spouse and I > do > > > not find > > > > any multiple relationship. > > > > > There may be some insatisfactory relationship between them > due > > > to the > > > > aspect of Sa on both the luminaries and karak Ve. > > > > > I may be totally wrong also but the fact may be highlighted > by > > > > Manoshi. > > > > > Thanks and regards. > > > > > Ramesh Mishra > > > > > > > > > > Manoshi Chatterjee khallopapa@ wrote: > > > > > Dear All, > > > > > > > > > > I got this chart yesterday. I have to confirm the marriage > > date > > > yet. > > > > > Chart seems to be right as I matched a few events. I want to > > > discuss > > > > > about what you can predict about the married life, what about > > > > > multilple relationships/marriage, if anything can be seen > from > > > the > > > > > chart. I would like to request Ash as well to give his > inputs > > for > > > > > learning purpose. > > > > > > > > > > 10th March 1973 > > > > > 19:57 > > > > > Bombay > > > > > > > > > > I will post about what I could see and what I couldnt in a > day > > or > > > > > two. > > > > > > > > > > thanks > > > > > Manoshi > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Find out what India is talking about on Answers India. > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 21, 2006 Report Share Posted July 21, 2006 Hello Manoshi, May I bother to comment your analysis ? Please do not mind for this. If you do not agree you may correct me with your replay.I think this may be good for learning. You said marriage took place after considering the moderation of delay. When you consider the moderation by Jup then the delay is over in the month of Dec 1997. But marriage was much before this. I think Ash is correct taking advantage of nullification of delay caused due to lagna and 9th lord in navamsa in 5:9 combination. This point I overlooked so I considered full delay. When the delay is nullified then immediately Ju antara was following and Jup gave her marriage. Next point is for the child birth. As you mentioned birth of a child took place in Jun 1996 i.e. during Sa antara. It means she might have conceive sometime in the month of Sep 1995 in Sa antara itself. Ve is LoD and Sa is LoE for 12th house of conception. Sa causes delay in conception . Sa has less point and Ve has strong point for 12th house but Sa is NSD as well as SD for Ve, so conception might be in this antara. Now for child birth Ve is LoD and Me is LoE for 5th house .Sa ia LoB, Su is LoA and Ve is LoC.Sa is in house C, Sa is himself LoB and Sa aspects LoA so full delay is caused by Sa .Birth took place in Sa antara though SD of Ve and Ve has highest point 42 for 5th house. I could not understand how Sa gave birth of a child being delay causing planet. When you consider 11th house as B then Mo is LoB, Sa is himself LoA, Ma is LoC all these houses or planet is aspected by Sa means delay. LoD is Ma and LoE is Ju . For 11th all the planets are >12 in WS. Sa is SD to Ju. Can Sa give birth of child. In marriage we do not consider the reduction of delay by Ju so here also. For 12th house also Sa is playing same role . But difference is here that Sa is LoE and SD to Ve so conception took place. Once conception is achieved then birth has to take place. Ju is in 5th with strong points and this is the saving grace. Now I am going out of time so more in next mail. You may correct me if I am wrong anywhere.Thanks and regards. Ramesh Mishra Manoshi Chatterjee <khallopapa wrote: sorry Gita, I dont have the details of the husband. and I dont think I could get it either. --Manoshi , " kaslearner " <kaslearner wrote: > > Manoshi, > > If possible, please post the birth details of the husband also. > Let's look at the compatibility. > > -Gita > > , " Manoshi > Chatterjee " <khallopapa@> wrote: > > > > Yes Ash. Congrats! but what if it's jupiter then could you please > > explain why would it reduce delay in female chart, why not male? > > > > Do you find other events matching? like separation, divorce etc. > and > > why? parents are pretty sure about the birth time though. > > > > looking forward to your response. > > > > --Manoshi > > > > > > , " ashsam73 " > > <ashsam73@> wrote: > > > > > > Dear Manoshi, > > > > > > I did say in my mail, that if the chart was female more chances > of > > > marriage in Ju antra which is the exact antra she got married in. > > > > > > > > > /message/12365 > > > > > > Manoshi, here Ju is in capricorn so it can't check the delay of > > Sa. > > > However, in this case, I had selected Ju antra based on 2 points > > one > > > that the chart was that of a female and secondly lagna and 9th > > lord > > > of navamsa are in 5:9 so there is blessing which might reduce > > delay. > > > > > > Cheers !!! > > > Ash > > > > > > > > > , " Manoshi > > > Chatterjee " <khallopapa@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear All and Krushna ji, > > > > > > > > The lady is divorced...which I could not see from the chart. I > > > would > > > > like to have more opinions on this. > > > > > > > > Planet Degrees > > > > As 14 Vi 43 > > > > Su 27 Aq 18 > > > > Mo 10 Ta 20 > > > > Ma 25 Sg 54 > > > > MeR 3 Pi 25 > > > > Ju 10 Cp 31 > > > > Ve 19 Aq 40 > > > > Sa 21 Ta 38 > > > > Ra 21 Sg 2 > > > > Ke 21 Ge 2 > > > > > > > > Marriage timing: > > > > > > > > Saturn is causing delay and jupiter is aspecting saturn. > Jupiter > > > is in > > > > Saturn sign so will it reduce dalay? lets s ee other qualities > of > > > > jupiter too. It is in moon nakshatra, mars navamsa, aspected > by > > > 6th lord > > > > saturn. > > > > > > > > She got married in 1994 november (if you take delay > moderation > > by > > > > jupiter in consideration, marriage time is right). Yes Ramesh, > > it > > > was a > > > > love marriage...against her parents wishes (as people said), > > > though the > > > > parents disagree that they were against it. > > > > > > > > child was born in 1996 june (saturn has high points for 11th > > > house, 5th > > > > house points are low indicating a girl child). > > > > > > > > separation in year 2000 > > > > > > > > legal separation (divorce) in 2006 March > > > > > > > > Acquired property(house) in 2005 April (sun antra with high > > points > > > for > > > > 4th) > > > > > > > > has done masters in personal management and also English. She > is > > > > working. Is in India. First job sometime in 1996-97. > > > > > > > > How do we judge this chart? > > > > > > > > > > > > --Manoshi > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > , ramesh mishra > > > > <aarceemastro2002@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Hello Manoshi, Namaskar, > > > > > The lagna of this native is rising with 14 Vi 43. The Su to > Ve > > > > distance is OK < 43 deg but Ve is ahead of Su. Therefore Ve is > > > weak and > > > > combust. > > > > > NK and FK both is Ve who has gone to 6th house and aspected > by > > > 6th > > > > lord Sa, > > > > > it seems that native is not interested in material enjoyment. > > > > > There is one zero in SAV chart contributed by Su in 8th > house. > > > > > Me/Ve 2/12 and 6/8 in navamsa, Me/Ju 3/11 and 5/9 . Su/Sa > 4/10 > > > and > > > > 2/12, Ma/Ve 3/11 and 5/9 > > > > > Ve has gone to the navamsa of Ju who is LoD for 7th > > > > > There is full delay caused by Sa, though delay is moderated > by > > > the > > > > aspect of Ju on Sa it is cancelled due to presence of Ju in Sa > > > sign. > > > > Therefore delay will be over when Sa enters aries sometime in > > Apr > > > last > > > > week of 1998. That time native was passing through Me antara > in > > Ra > > > main > > > > period .Next antara is followed by Ke. Ke is SD to Me and Me > is > > > weak for > > > > 7th house hence elminated.Next comes the antara of Ve . Ve is > > 2nd > > > lord > > > > and aspected by Sa , so looses its quality. Therefore Ve > antara > > is > > > also > > > > eliminated. Su antara is running through 26 Jun 2004 till 20 > May > > > 2005. > > > > Sun is LoE and has 17 points for 7th house in WS. Su might > have > > > given > > > > marriage in its third sector in between Feb/2005 to May/2005. > > > > > Most probably in the month of Mar 2005 when Su was > transiting > > in > > > > Pisces. > > > > > I do not know what is the fact. Manoshi please guide me if I > > am > > > wrong > > > > anywhere. > > > > > This chart is showing love marriage. I guess native might > have > > > gone > > > > against the will of his/her father and married. > > > > > The native has good relationship with his/her spouse and I > do > > > not find > > > > any multiple relationship. > > > > > There may be some insatisfactory relationship between them > due > > > to the > > > > aspect of Sa on both the luminaries and karak Ve. > > > > > I may be totally wrong also but the fact may be highlighted > by > > > > Manoshi. > > > > > Thanks and regards. > > > > > Ramesh Mishra > > > > > > > > > > Manoshi Chatterjee khallopapa@ wrote: > > > > > Dear All, > > > > > > > > > > I got this chart yesterday. I have to confirm the marriage > > date > > > yet. > > > > > Chart seems to be right as I matched a few events. I want to > > > discuss > > > > > about what you can predict about the married life, what about > > > > > multilple relationships/marriage, if anything can be seen > from > > > the > > > > > chart. I would like to request Ash as well to give his > inputs > > for > > > > > learning purpose. > > > > > > > > > > 10th March 1973 > > > > > 19:57 > > > > > Bombay > > > > > > > > > > I will post about what I could see and what I couldnt in a > day > > or > > > > > two. > > > > > > > > > > thanks > > > > > Manoshi > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Find out what India is talking about on Answers India. > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 21, 2006 Report Share Posted July 21, 2006 Dear Manoshi, How did you come to a conclusion that high points in 11th and low points in 5th gave a girl child? I have never read or heard Krushanji say that low points in 5th house would indicate girl. The points in the WS indicate power. When the power is less it means that particular house for that particular planet is weak so there is less happiness or we say that there is not enough power for event to happen. So here we talk of child birth so when points are low it means that there is not enough power for the planet to furnish the timing of event. High points in 11th might give conception, means 11th house has good power, so more power means event can take place. For sex of the child, you must find the running age of the mother and the conception time i.e with that you can find the nakshtra that conception took place in. That should give u the data to identify the sex of the child. Unless, Krushnaji himself has told u personally that low points would mean girl child, then you can please let us know. Thanks, Cheers !!! Ash , " Manoshi Chatterjee " <khallopapa wrote: > > > Dear All and Krushna ji, > > The lady is divorced...which I could not see from the chart. I would > like to have more opinions on this. > > Planet Degrees > As 14 Vi 43 > Su 27 Aq 18 > Mo 10 Ta 20 > Ma 25 Sg 54 > MeR 3 Pi 25 > Ju 10 Cp 31 > Ve 19 Aq 40 > Sa 21 Ta 38 > Ra 21 Sg 2 > Ke 21 Ge 2 > > Marriage timing: > > Saturn is causing delay and jupiter is aspecting saturn. Jupiter is in > Saturn sign so will it reduce dalay? lets s ee other qualities of > jupiter too. It is in moon nakshatra, mars navamsa, aspected by 6th lord > saturn. > > She got married in 1994 november (if you take delay moderation by > jupiter in consideration, marriage time is right). Yes Ramesh, it was a > love marriage...against her parents wishes (as people said), though the > parents disagree that they were against it. > > child was born in 1996 june (saturn has high points for 11th house, 5th > house points are low indicating a girl child). > > separation in year 2000 > > legal separation (divorce) in 2006 March > > Acquired property(house) in 2005 April (sun antra with high points for > 4th) > > has done masters in personal management and also English. She is > working. Is in India. First job sometime in 1996-97. > > How do we judge this chart? > > > --Manoshi , ramesh mishra > <aarceemastro2002@> wrote: > > > > Hello Manoshi, Namaskar, > > The lagna of this native is rising with 14 Vi 43. The Su to Ve > distance is OK < 43 deg but Ve is ahead of Su. Therefore Ve is weak and > combust. > > NK and FK both is Ve who has gone to 6th house and aspected by 6th > lord Sa, > > it seems that native is not interested in material enjoyment. > > There is one zero in SAV chart contributed by Su in 8th house. > > Me/Ve 2/12 and 6/8 in navamsa, Me/Ju 3/11 and 5/9 . Su/Sa 4/10 and > 2/12, Ma/Ve 3/11 and 5/9 > > Ve has gone to the navamsa of Ju who is LoD for 7th > > There is full delay caused by Sa, though delay is moderated by the > aspect of Ju on Sa it is cancelled due to presence of Ju in Sa sign. > Therefore delay will be over when Sa enters aries sometime in Apr last > week of 1998. That time native was passing through Me antara in Ra main > period .Next antara is followed by Ke. Ke is SD to Me and Me is weak for > 7th house hence elminated.Next comes the antara of Ve . Ve is 2nd lord > and aspected by Sa , so looses its quality. Therefore Ve antara is also > eliminated. Su antara is running through 26 Jun 2004 till 20 May 2005. > Sun is LoE and has 17 points for 7th house in WS. Su might have given > marriage in its third sector in between Feb/2005 to May/2005. > > Most probably in the month of Mar 2005 when Su was transiting in > Pisces. > > I do not know what is the fact. Manoshi please guide me if I am wrong > anywhere. > > This chart is showing love marriage. I guess native might have gone > against the will of his/her father and married. > > The native has good relationship with his/her spouse and I do not find > any multiple relationship. > > There may be some insatisfactory relationship between them due to the > aspect of Sa on both the luminaries and karak Ve. > > I may be totally wrong also but the fact may be highlighted by > Manoshi. > > Thanks and regards. > > Ramesh Mishra > > > > Manoshi Chatterjee khallopapa@ wrote: > > Dear All, > > > > I got this chart yesterday. I have to confirm the marriage date yet. > > Chart seems to be right as I matched a few events. I want to discuss > > about what you can predict about the married life, what about > > multilple relationships/marriage, if anything can be seen from the > > chart. I would like to request Ash as well to give his inputs for > > learning purpose. > > > > 10th March 1973 > > 19:57 > > Bombay > > > > I will post about what I could see and what I couldnt in a day or > > two. > > > > thanks > > Manoshi > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Find out what India is talking about on Answers India. > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 21, 2006 Report Share Posted July 21, 2006 Dear Ash, one day whole talking Krushna ji had indicated about this. But I dont know the depth of it, so I said (MAY indicate a girl child) --Manoshi , " ashsam73 " <ashsam73 wrote: > > Dear Manoshi, > How did you come to a conclusion that high points in 11th and low > points in 5th gave a girl child? > > I have never read or heard Krushanji say that low points in 5th > house would indicate girl. > > The points in the WS indicate power. When the power is less it > means that particular house for that particular planet is weak so > there is less happiness or we say that there is not enough power for > event to happen. So here we talk of child birth so when points are > low it means that there is not enough power for the planet to > furnish the timing of event. > > High points in 11th might give conception, means 11th house has good > power, so more power means event can take place. > > For sex of the child, you must find the running age of the mother > and the conception time i.e with that you can find the nakshtra that > conception took place in. That should give u the data to identify > the sex of the child. > > Unless, Krushnaji himself has told u personally that low points > would mean girl child, then you can please let us know. > > Thanks, > Cheers !!! > Ash > > , " Manoshi > Chatterjee " <khallopapa@> wrote: > > > > > > Dear All and Krushna ji, > > > > The lady is divorced...which I could not see from the chart. I > would > > like to have more opinions on this. > > > > Planet Degrees > > As 14 Vi 43 > > Su 27 Aq 18 > > Mo 10 Ta 20 > > Ma 25 Sg 54 > > MeR 3 Pi 25 > > Ju 10 Cp 31 > > Ve 19 Aq 40 > > Sa 21 Ta 38 > > Ra 21 Sg 2 > > Ke 21 Ge 2 > > > > Marriage timing: > > > > Saturn is causing delay and jupiter is aspecting saturn. Jupiter > is in > > Saturn sign so will it reduce dalay? lets s ee other qualities of > > jupiter too. It is in moon nakshatra, mars navamsa, aspected by > 6th lord > > saturn. > > > > She got married in 1994 november (if you take delay moderation by > > jupiter in consideration, marriage time is right). Yes Ramesh, it > was a > > love marriage...against her parents wishes (as people said), > though the > > parents disagree that they were against it. > > > > child was born in 1996 june (saturn has high points for 11th > house, 5th > > house points are low indicating a girl child). > > > > separation in year 2000 > > > > legal separation (divorce) in 2006 March > > > > Acquired property(house) in 2005 April (sun antra with high points > for > > 4th) > > > > has done masters in personal management and also English. She is > > working. Is in India. First job sometime in 1996-97. > > > > How do we judge this chart? > > > > > > --Manoshi > > > > > > > > > > > > > > , ramesh mishra > > <aarceemastro2002@> wrote: > > > > > > Hello Manoshi, Namaskar, > > > The lagna of this native is rising with 14 Vi 43. The Su to Ve > > distance is OK < 43 deg but Ve is ahead of Su. Therefore Ve is > weak and > > combust. > > > NK and FK both is Ve who has gone to 6th house and aspected by > 6th > > lord Sa, > > > it seems that native is not interested in material enjoyment. > > > There is one zero in SAV chart contributed by Su in 8th house. > > > Me/Ve 2/12 and 6/8 in navamsa, Me/Ju 3/11 and 5/9 . Su/Sa 4/10 > and > > 2/12, Ma/Ve 3/11 and 5/9 > > > Ve has gone to the navamsa of Ju who is LoD for 7th > > > There is full delay caused by Sa, though delay is moderated by > the > > aspect of Ju on Sa it is cancelled due to presence of Ju in Sa > sign. > > Therefore delay will be over when Sa enters aries sometime in Apr > last > > week of 1998. That time native was passing through Me antara in Ra > main > > period .Next antara is followed by Ke. Ke is SD to Me and Me is > weak for > > 7th house hence elminated.Next comes the antara of Ve . Ve is 2nd > lord > > and aspected by Sa , so looses its quality. Therefore Ve antara is > also > > eliminated. Su antara is running through 26 Jun 2004 till 20 May > 2005. > > Sun is LoE and has 17 points for 7th house in WS. Su might have > given > > marriage in its third sector in between Feb/2005 to May/2005. > > > Most probably in the month of Mar 2005 when Su was transiting in > > Pisces. > > > I do not know what is the fact. Manoshi please guide me if I am > wrong > > anywhere. > > > This chart is showing love marriage. I guess native might have > gone > > against the will of his/her father and married. > > > The native has good relationship with his/her spouse and I do > not find > > any multiple relationship. > > > There may be some insatisfactory relationship between them due > to the > > aspect of Sa on both the luminaries and karak Ve. > > > I may be totally wrong also but the fact may be highlighted by > > Manoshi. > > > Thanks and regards. > > > Ramesh Mishra > > > > > > Manoshi Chatterjee khallopapa@ wrote: > > > Dear All, > > > > > > I got this chart yesterday. I have to confirm the marriage date > yet. > > > Chart seems to be right as I matched a few events. I want to > discuss > > > about what you can predict about the married life, what about > > > multilple relationships/marriage, if anything can be seen from > the > > > chart. I would like to request Ash as well to give his inputs for > > > learning purpose. > > > > > > 10th March 1973 > > > 19:57 > > > Bombay > > > > > > I will post about what I could see and what I couldnt in a day or > > > two. > > > > > > thanks > > > Manoshi > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Find out what India is talking about on Answers India. > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 21, 2006 Report Share Posted July 21, 2006 Dear Ramesh, I would study the chart more and give feedback. I am going very busy now a days..so please wait for a day or two. I apologize for this delay. thanks Manoshi , ramesh mishra <aarceemastro2002 wrote: > > Hello Manoshi, > May I bother to comment your analysis ? Please do not mind for this. If you do not agree you may correct me with your replay.I think this may be good for learning. > You said marriage took place after considering the moderation of delay. When you consider the moderation by Jup then the delay is over in the month of Dec 1997. But marriage was much before this. I think Ash is correct taking advantage of nullification of delay caused due to lagna and 9th lord in navamsa in 5:9 combination. This point I overlooked so I considered full delay. When the delay is nullified then immediately Ju antara was following and Jup gave her marriage. > Next point is for the child birth. As you mentioned birth of a child took place in Jun 1996 i.e. during Sa antara. It means she might have conceive sometime in the month of Sep 1995 in Sa antara itself. Ve is LoD and Sa is LoE for 12th house of conception. Sa causes delay in conception . Sa has less point and Ve has strong point for 12th house but Sa is NSD as well as SD for Ve, so conception might be in this antara. Now for child birth Ve is LoD and Me is LoE for 5th house .Sa ia LoB, Su is LoA and Ve is LoC.Sa is in house C, Sa is himself LoB and Sa aspects LoA so full delay is caused by Sa .Birth took place in Sa antara though SD of Ve and Ve has highest point 42 for 5th house. I could not understand how Sa gave birth of a child being delay causing planet. > When you consider 11th house as B then Mo is LoB, Sa is himself LoA, Ma is LoC all these houses or planet is aspected by Sa means delay. LoD is Ma and LoE is Ju . For 11th all the planets are >12 in WS. Sa is SD to Ju. Can Sa give birth of child. In marriage we do not consider the reduction of delay by Ju so here also. > For 12th house also Sa is playing same role . But difference is here that Sa is LoE and SD to Ve so conception took place. Once conception is achieved then birth has to take place. Ju is in 5th with strong points and this is the saving grace. > Now I am going out of time so more in next mail. You may correct me if I am wrong anywhere.Thanks and regards. > Ramesh Mishra > > Manoshi Chatterjee <khallopapa wrote: > sorry Gita, I dont have the details of the husband. and I dont think > I could get it either. > > --Manoshi > > , " kaslearner " > <kaslearner@> wrote: > > > > Manoshi, > > > > If possible, please post the birth details of the husband also. > > Let's look at the compatibility. > > > > -Gita > > > > , " Manoshi > > Chatterjee " <khallopapa@> wrote: > > > > > > Yes Ash. Congrats! but what if it's jupiter then could you > please > > > explain why would it reduce delay in female chart, why not male? > > > > > > Do you find other events matching? like separation, divorce etc. > > and > > > why? parents are pretty sure about the birth time though. > > > > > > looking forward to your response. > > > > > > --Manoshi > > > > > > > > > , " ashsam73 " > > > <ashsam73@> wrote: > > > > > > > > Dear Manoshi, > > > > > > > > I did say in my mail, that if the chart was female more > chances > > of > > > > marriage in Ju antra which is the exact antra she got married > in. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > /message/12365 > > > > > > > > Manoshi, here Ju is in capricorn so it can't check the delay > of > > > Sa. > > > > However, in this case, I had selected Ju antra based on 2 > points > > > one > > > > that the chart was that of a female and secondly lagna and > 9th > > > lord > > > > of navamsa are in 5:9 so there is blessing which might reduce > > > delay. > > > > > > > > Cheers !!! > > > > Ash > > > > > > > > > > > > , " Manoshi > > > > Chatterjee " <khallopapa@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear All and Krushna ji, > > > > > > > > > > The lady is divorced...which I could not see from the chart. > I > > > > would > > > > > like to have more opinions on this. > > > > > > > > > > Planet Degrees > > > > > As 14 Vi 43 > > > > > Su 27 Aq 18 > > > > > Mo 10 Ta 20 > > > > > Ma 25 Sg 54 > > > > > MeR 3 Pi 25 > > > > > Ju 10 Cp 31 > > > > > Ve 19 Aq 40 > > > > > Sa 21 Ta 38 > > > > > Ra 21 Sg 2 > > > > > Ke 21 Ge 2 > > > > > > > > > > Marriage timing: > > > > > > > > > > Saturn is causing delay and jupiter is aspecting saturn. > > Jupiter > > > > is in > > > > > Saturn sign so will it reduce dalay? lets s ee other > qualities > > of > > > > > jupiter too. It is in moon nakshatra, mars navamsa, aspected > > by > > > > 6th lord > > > > > saturn. > > > > > > > > > > She got married in 1994 november (if you take delay > > moderation > > > by > > > > > jupiter in consideration, marriage time is right). Yes > Ramesh, > > > it > > > > was a > > > > > love marriage...against her parents wishes (as people > said), > > > > though the > > > > > parents disagree that they were against it. > > > > > > > > > > child was born in 1996 june (saturn has high points for 11th > > > > house, 5th > > > > > house points are low indicating a girl child). > > > > > > > > > > separation in year 2000 > > > > > > > > > > legal separation (divorce) in 2006 March > > > > > > > > > > Acquired property(house) in 2005 April (sun antra with high > > > points > > > > for > > > > > 4th) > > > > > > > > > > has done masters in personal management and also English. > She > > is > > > > > working. Is in India. First job sometime in 1996-97. > > > > > > > > > > How do we judge this chart? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --Manoshi > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > , ramesh > mishra > > > > > <aarceemastro2002@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > Hello Manoshi, Namaskar, > > > > > > The lagna of this native is rising with 14 Vi 43. The Su > to > > Ve > > > > > distance is OK < 43 deg but Ve is ahead of Su. Therefore Ve > is > > > > weak and > > > > > combust. > > > > > > NK and FK both is Ve who has gone to 6th house and > aspected > > by > > > > 6th > > > > > lord Sa, > > > > > > it seems that native is not interested in material > enjoyment. > > > > > > There is one zero in SAV chart contributed by Su in 8th > > house. > > > > > > Me/Ve 2/12 and 6/8 in navamsa, Me/Ju 3/11 and 5/9 . Su/Sa > > 4/10 > > > > and > > > > > 2/12, Ma/Ve 3/11 and 5/9 > > > > > > Ve has gone to the navamsa of Ju who is LoD for 7th > > > > > > There is full delay caused by Sa, though delay is > moderated > > by > > > > the > > > > > aspect of Ju on Sa it is cancelled due to presence of Ju in > Sa > > > > sign. > > > > > Therefore delay will be over when Sa enters aries sometime > in > > > Apr > > > > last > > > > > week of 1998. That time native was passing through Me antara > > in > > > Ra > > > > main > > > > > period .Next antara is followed by Ke. Ke is SD to Me and Me > > is > > > > weak for > > > > > 7th house hence elminated.Next comes the antara of Ve . Ve > is > > > 2nd > > > > lord > > > > > and aspected by Sa , so looses its quality. Therefore Ve > > antara > > > is > > > > also > > > > > eliminated. Su antara is running through 26 Jun 2004 till 20 > > May > > > > 2005. > > > > > Sun is LoE and has 17 points for 7th house in WS. Su might > > have > > > > given > > > > > marriage in its third sector in between Feb/2005 to May/2005. > > > > > > Most probably in the month of Mar 2005 when Su was > > transiting > > > in > > > > > Pisces. > > > > > > I do not know what is the fact. Manoshi please guide me if > I > > > am > > > > wrong > > > > > anywhere. > > > > > > This chart is showing love marriage. I guess native might > > have > > > > gone > > > > > against the will of his/her father and married. > > > > > > The native has good relationship with his/her spouse and I > > do > > > > not find > > > > > any multiple relationship. > > > > > > There may be some insatisfactory relationship between them > > due > > > > to the > > > > > aspect of Sa on both the luminaries and karak Ve. > > > > > > I may be totally wrong also but the fact may be > highlighted > > by > > > > > Manoshi. > > > > > > Thanks and regards. > > > > > > Ramesh Mishra > > > > > > > > > > > > Manoshi Chatterjee khallopapa@ wrote: > > > > > > Dear All, > > > > > > > > > > > > I got this chart yesterday. I have to confirm the marriage > > > date > > > > yet. > > > > > > Chart seems to be right as I matched a few events. I want > to > > > > discuss > > > > > > about what you can predict about the married life, what > about > > > > > > multilple relationships/marriage, if anything can be seen > > from > > > > the > > > > > > chart. I would like to request Ash as well to give his > > inputs > > > for > > > > > > learning purpose. > > > > > > > > > > > > 10th March 1973 > > > > > > 19:57 > > > > > > Bombay > > > > > > > > > > > > I will post about what I could see and what I couldnt in a > > day > > > or > > > > > > two. > > > > > > > > > > > > thanks > > > > > > Manoshi > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Find out what India is talking about on Answers > India. > > > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 22, 2006 Report Share Posted July 22, 2006 Dear Ash, Manoshi, Gita and list members, In my earlier mail I tried to verify the marriage date and birth of child. In this I would like to see the conditions of separation and then legally divorced. In case of separation I am taking 2nd house as B .Venus is the karak for 2nd and this Ve is in the navamsa of Jup who is LoB for 7th and Ve is in 6th house with Su. Ve is malefic in 6th house so it is malefic and spoiled being in the sign of Sa and conjunct with Su in 6th house. Me is 12th lord for 2nd and occupies house B for 7th. Me is powerful in 7th house and cast his malefic aspect on lagna. It means something going to be adverse with the native. Me is also weak for 2nd in WS. Therefore something adverse is going to happen with native during Me antara. Ma is in 10th from Me and he casts a malefic aspect on 7th and Me as well. Me is also SD to Ma. Ma is in 7th house in navamsa.. Ve is LoA and LoB who is in house C for 2nd . Sa LoC is in house A and aspect Ve.Therefore these planetary combinations fulfull the cause of separation. The separation might have taken place in Me antara .As I told above that Me has <12 points for 2nd in WS Then the following antaras of Ke, Ve and Su followed who are not in good conditions. Ke is SD to Me so he acts like Me. For legal action Mo is LoE and for fructification of legally divorce or permanent separation Mo is LoD.Therefore during Mo antara she got the legal divorce. If anything is wrong in my assessment please do correct me with adequate explanation.Thanks and regards. Ramesh Mishra. Manoshi Chatterjee <khallopapa wrote: Dear All and Krushna ji, The lady is divorced...which I could not see from the chart. I would like to have more opinions on this. Planet Degrees As 14 Vi 43 Su 27 Aq 18 Mo 10 Ta 20 Ma 25 Sg 54 MeR 3 Pi 25 Ju 10 Cp 31 Ve 19 Aq 40 Sa 21 Ta 38 Ra 21 Sg 2 Ke 21 Ge 2 Marriage timing: Saturn is causing delay and jupiter is aspecting saturn. Jupiter is in Saturn sign so will it reduce dalay? lets s ee other qualities of jupiter too. It is in moon nakshatra, mars navamsa, aspected by 6th lord saturn. She got married in 1994 november (if you take delay moderation by jupiter in consideration, marriage time is right). Yes Ramesh, it was a love marriage...against her parents wishes (as people said), though the parents disagree that they were against it. child was born in 1996 june (saturn has high points for 11th house, 5th house points are low indicating a girl child). separation in year 2000 legal separation (divorce) in 2006 March Acquired property(house) in 2005 April (sun antra with high points for 4th) has done masters in personal management and also English. She is working. Is in India. First job sometime in 1996-97. How do we judge this chart? --Manoshi , ramesh mishra <aarceemastro2002 wrote: > > Hello Manoshi, Namaskar, > The lagna of this native is rising with 14 Vi 43. The Su to Ve distance is OK < 43 deg but Ve is ahead of Su. Therefore Ve is weak and combust. > NK and FK both is Ve who has gone to 6th house and aspected by 6th lord Sa, > it seems that native is not interested in material enjoyment. > There is one zero in SAV chart contributed by Su in 8th house. > Me/Ve 2/12 and 6/8 in navamsa, Me/Ju 3/11 and 5/9 . Su/Sa 4/10 and 2/12, Ma/Ve 3/11 and 5/9 > Ve has gone to the navamsa of Ju who is LoD for 7th > There is full delay caused by Sa, though delay is moderated by the aspect of Ju on Sa it is cancelled due to presence of Ju in Sa sign. Therefore delay will be over when Sa enters aries sometime in Apr last week of 1998. That time native was passing through Me antara in Ra main period .Next antara is followed by Ke. Ke is SD to Me and Me is weak for 7th house hence elminated.Next comes the antara of Ve . Ve is 2nd lord and aspected by Sa , so looses its quality. Therefore Ve antara is also eliminated. Su antara is running through 26 Jun 2004 till 20 May 2005. Sun is LoE and has 17 points for 7th house in WS. Su might have given marriage in its third sector in between Feb/2005 to May/2005. > Most probably in the month of Mar 2005 when Su was transiting in Pisces. > I do not know what is the fact. Manoshi please guide me if I am wrong anywhere. > This chart is showing love marriage. I guess native might have gone against the will of his/her father and married. > The native has good relationship with his/her spouse and I do not find any multiple relationship. > There may be some insatisfactory relationship between them due to the aspect of Sa on both the luminaries and karak Ve. > I may be totally wrong also but the fact may be highlighted by Manoshi. > Thanks and regards. > Ramesh Mishra > > Manoshi Chatterjee khallopapa wrote: > Dear All, > > I got this chart yesterday. I have to confirm the marriage date yet. > Chart seems to be right as I matched a few events. I want to discuss > about what you can predict about the married life, what about > multilple relationships/marriage, if anything can be seen from the > chart. I would like to request Ash as well to give his inputs for > learning purpose. > > 10th March 1973 > 19:57 > Bombay > > I will post about what I could see and what I couldnt in a day or > two. > > thanks > Manoshi > Find out what India is talking about on Answers India. > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.