Guest guest Posted February 5, 2007 Report Share Posted February 5, 2007 Ash, I realized that the new article is my chart, and the conversation you and I had in 2004. The summary points for my chart that you have on your site are different from what I get using KAS 3.1.1. With the new version of the program, Mars has less than 12 points in 6th house. This has always confused me - in your prediction, the reason you had mentioned Mars and Merc was that they were two strongest planets for 6th house. Can you please check? Shashank Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 5, 2007 Report Share Posted February 5, 2007 In the new program, here are the values for Mars for my chart - 1st house - 25 2nd house - 7 3rd house - 6 4th house - 16 5th house - 12 6th house - 10 7th house - 9 8th house - 12 9th house - 24 10th house - 10 11th house - 9 12th house - 9 Thanks Shashank , " sgupta2269 " <sgupta2269 wrote: > > Ash, > > I realized that the new article is my chart, and the conversation you > and I had in 2004. > > The summary points for my chart that you have on your site are > different from what I get using KAS 3.1.1. With the new version of the > program, Mars has less than 12 points in 6th house. > > This has always confused me - in your prediction, the reason you had > mentioned Mars and Merc was that they were two strongest planets for > 6th house. > > Can you please check? > > Shashank > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 5, 2007 Report Share Posted February 5, 2007 Can somebody else please cast the chart, and let me know the points for Mars? S , " sgupta2269 " <sgupta2269 wrote: > > In the new program, here are the values for Mars for my chart - > > 1st house - 25 > 2nd house - 7 > 3rd house - 6 > 4th house - 16 > 5th house - 12 > 6th house - 10 > 7th house - 9 > 8th house - 12 > 9th house - 24 > 10th house - 10 > 11th house - 9 > 12th house - 9 > > Thanks > Shashank > > , " sgupta2269 " > <sgupta2269@> wrote: > > > > Ash, > > > > I realized that the new article is my chart, and the conversation > you > > and I had in 2004. > > > > The summary points for my chart that you have on your site are > > different from what I get using KAS 3.1.1. With the new version of > the > > program, Mars has less than 12 points in 6th house. > > > > This has always confused me - in your prediction, the reason you > had > > mentioned Mars and Merc was that they were two strongest planets > for > > 6th house. > > > > Can you please check? > > > > Shashank > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 5, 2007 Report Share Posted February 5, 2007 Shashank, I shall go back home and take a look at it again. If there is any mistake I shall rectify it. Cheers !!! Ash -> http://www.ashtro.ca , " sgupta2269 " <sgupta2269 wrote: > > Can somebody else please cast the chart, and let me know the points > for Mars? > > S > > > , " sgupta2269 " > <sgupta2269@> wrote: > > > > In the new program, here are the values for Mars for my chart - > > > > 1st house - 25 > > 2nd house - 7 > > 3rd house - 6 > > 4th house - 16 > > 5th house - 12 > > 6th house - 10 > > 7th house - 9 > > 8th house - 12 > > 9th house - 24 > > 10th house - 10 > > 11th house - 9 > > 12th house - 9 > > > > Thanks > > Shashank > > > > , " sgupta2269 " > > <sgupta2269@> wrote: > > > > > > Ash, > > > > > > I realized that the new article is my chart, and the conversation > > you > > > and I had in 2004. > > > > > > The summary points for my chart that you have on your site are > > > different from what I get using KAS 3.1.1. With the new version > of > > the > > > program, Mars has less than 12 points in 6th house. > > > > > > This has always confused me - in your prediction, the reason you > > had > > > mentioned Mars and Merc was that they were two strongest planets > > for > > > 6th house. > > > > > > Can you please check? > > > > > > Shashank > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 5, 2007 Report Share Posted February 5, 2007 Ash, Since we did not have much conversations after that, here is what happened - I joined the job on 16th June 2004, and lost it on 30th Sept 2004. However, I found another job that I joined on 18th Oct, 2004 (Venus and Mars PDF and still 3rd sector of Mer antardasha). I am still in this job. According to the new version of the program, both Venus and Mars have less than 12 points in the 6th house. Although Mer antardasha gave a job (in its 3rd sector), my job came in the PDFs of the planets with the lowest points. If we were to extend the logic of marriage in lowest points being unhappy marriage to the job situation, the new job starting in lowest points should be problematic too. Am I right? Shashank , " ashsam73 " <ashsam73 wrote: > > Shashank, > I shall go back home and take a look at it again. If there is any > mistake I shall rectify it. > Cheers !!! > Ash -> http://www.ashtro.ca > > , " sgupta2269 " > <sgupta2269@> wrote: > > > > Can somebody else please cast the chart, and let me know the points > > for Mars? > > > > S > > > > > > , " sgupta2269 " > > <sgupta2269@> wrote: > > > > > > In the new program, here are the values for Mars for my chart - > > > > > > 1st house - 25 > > > 2nd house - 7 > > > 3rd house - 6 > > > 4th house - 16 > > > 5th house - 12 > > > 6th house - 10 > > > 7th house - 9 > > > 8th house - 12 > > > 9th house - 24 > > > 10th house - 10 > > > 11th house - 9 > > > 12th house - 9 > > > > > > Thanks > > > Shashank > > > > > > , " sgupta2269 " > > > <sgupta2269@> wrote: > > > > > > > > Ash, > > > > > > > > I realized that the new article is my chart, and the conversation > > > you > > > > and I had in 2004. > > > > > > > > The summary points for my chart that you have on your site are > > > > different from what I get using KAS 3.1.1. With the new version > > of > > > the > > > > program, Mars has less than 12 points in 6th house. > > > > > > > > This has always confused me - in your prediction, the reason you > > > had > > > > mentioned Mars and Merc was that they were two strongest planets > > > for > > > > 6th house. > > > > > > > > Can you please check? > > > > > > > > Shashank > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 5, 2007 Report Share Posted February 5, 2007 Shashank, The article is proper and so are the points. I have checked my KAS program and its tallying with what I have written. Yes, I do remember that at that point in time u had said to a friend of mine that despite the correct prediction that u were not convinced about KAS :-). I also checked my records and I had also predicted the job that u got on 16th October 2004. That time u had asked me if your contract would be extended and I had said yes, or if that contract ended u would get another one as Me-Ma pdf. That was on around 5th October or maybe prior. The record I have states 5th October 2004. So your contract ended on 30th sept 2004 and u got a new or started a new contract on 16th October 2004. I pointing out Me-Ma pdf i.e. 1st contract (when you wrote to list) Me and Ma 15-Jun 20-Jun and for your second contract on 16th oct i.e. (u did not acknowledge that on list) Me and Ma 10-Oct 16-Oct is not a co-incident. The power of Me and Ma u can see from the points. Granted, that this might have been predicted using the old WS but in that old WS, the points for Mercury antra and Mars would have been proper as reflected. Its only when we had changed the 12th lord logic which was misunderstood that this current error might have crept in and that is also in a very unique case when as in your case 1st lord and 6th lord is Mars and at the same time 1st points are more than 6th house as in your case, Mars is with 6 bindus in 1st house and 2 bindus in 6th house so its more 1st lord and here we do take the aspect as benefical on 10th and 1st house which is C and A for 6th as B. We will release a new copy of the WS, where we had done this change but somehow did not get transmitted into KAS3.1.1. So I want to thank you for bringing pointing this out as it will help all. So there is nothing to be confused about in my prediction. It is all in line, even with old WS it was in line. Mars in no way can be weak for you, it is LoB and LoA and it more like 1st lord so its aspect is to be taken. Ma will aspect benefically 10th hosue and 1st house thereby increasing the points in the WS. It is not co-incidence. However, being convinced about KAS is upto u :-) In any case, your chart will help many people understand timing of job using KAS. Cheers !!! Ash -> http://www.ashtro.ca , " sgupta2269 " <sgupta2269 wrote: > > Ash, > > I realized that the new article is my chart, and the conversation you > and I had in 2004. > > The summary points for my chart that you have on your site are > different from what I get using KAS 3.1.1. With the new version of the > program, Mars has less than 12 points in 6th house. > > This has always confused me - in your prediction, the reason you had > mentioned Mars and Merc was that they were two strongest planets for > 6th house. > > Can you please check? > > Shashank > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 6, 2007 Report Share Posted February 6, 2007 , " sgupta2269 " Dear Shashank and Ash, Shashank, you are correct.The points of Ma in ws for 6th house is only 10 and not only for 6th house it has < 12 for 2nd, 3rd, 6th,7th, 10th, 11th and 12th house too. Whereas in Ash article 6th house is showing <12 points for 11th and 12th house by Ma. So due to this everybody may give wrong predictions. Either this program carries bug or something wrong with Ash programe. Ash, kindly look into it otherwise our effort will go waste. Thanks Shashank for bringing this notice. Thanks and regards. Ramesh Mishra <sgupta2269 wrote: > > Ash, > > Since we did not have much conversations after that, here is what > happened - > > I joined the job on 16th June 2004, and lost it on 30th Sept 2004. > However, I found another job that I joined on 18th Oct, 2004 (Venus > and Mars PDF and still 3rd sector of Mer antardasha). I am still in > this job. > > According to the new version of the program, both Venus and Mars have > less than 12 points in the 6th house. Although Mer antardasha gave a > job (in its 3rd sector), my job came in the PDFs of the planets with > the lowest points. > > If we were to extend the logic of marriage in lowest points being > unhappy marriage to the job situation, the new job starting in lowest > points should be problematic too. > > Am I right? > > Shashank > > > , " ashsam73 " > <ashsam73@> wrote: > > > > Shashank, > > I shall go back home and take a look at it again. If there is any > > mistake I shall rectify it. > > Cheers !!! > > Ash -> http://www.ashtro.ca > > > > , " sgupta2269 " > > <sgupta2269@> wrote: > > > > > > Can somebody else please cast the chart, and let me know the > points > > > for Mars? > > > > > > S > > > > > > > > > , " sgupta2269 " > > > <sgupta2269@> wrote: > > > > > > > > In the new program, here are the values for Mars for my chart - > > > > > > > > 1st house - 25 > > > > 2nd house - 7 > > > > 3rd house - 6 > > > > 4th house - 16 > > > > 5th house - 12 > > > > 6th house - 10 > > > > 7th house - 9 > > > > 8th house - 12 > > > > 9th house - 24 > > > > 10th house - 10 > > > > 11th house - 9 > > > > 12th house - 9 > > > > > > > > Thanks > > > > Shashank > > > > > > > > , " sgupta2269 " > > > > <sgupta2269@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Ash, > > > > > > > > > > I realized that the new article is my chart, and the > conversation > > > > you > > > > > and I had in 2004. > > > > > > > > > > The summary points for my chart that you have on your site > are > > > > > different from what I get using KAS 3.1.1. With the new > version > > > of > > > > the > > > > > program, Mars has less than 12 points in 6th house. > > > > > > > > > > This has always confused me - in your prediction, the reason > you > > > > had > > > > > mentioned Mars and Merc was that they were two strongest > planets > > > > for > > > > > 6th house. > > > > > > > > > > Can you please check? > > > > > > > > > > Shashank > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 6, 2007 Report Share Posted February 6, 2007 yes mar has 10 points in summary in ur chart i do endorse this also rest all points are tallied except of MAR. ANUP sgupta2269 <sgupta2269 wrote: Ash, Since we did not have much conversations after that, here is what happened - I joined the job on 16th June 2004, and lost it on 30th Sept 2004. However, I found another job that I joined on 18th Oct, 2004 (Venus and Mars PDF and still 3rd sector of Mer antardasha). I am still in this job. According to the new version of the program, both Venus and Mars have less than 12 points in the 6th house. Although Mer antardasha gave a job (in its 3rd sector), my job came in the PDFs of the planets with the lowest points. If we were to extend the logic of marriage in lowest points being unhappy marriage to the job situation, the new job starting in lowest points should be problematic too. Am I right? Shashank , " ashsam73 " <ashsam73 wrote: > > Shashank, > I shall go back home and take a look at it again. If there is any > mistake I shall rectify it. > Cheers !!! > Ash -> http://www.ashtro.ca > > , " sgupta2269 " > <sgupta2269@> wrote: > > > > Can somebody else please cast the chart, and let me know the points > > for Mars? > > > > S > > > > > > , " sgupta2269 " > > <sgupta2269@> wrote: > > > > > > In the new program, here are the values for Mars for my chart - > > > > > > 1st house - 25 > > > 2nd house - 7 > > > 3rd house - 6 > > > 4th house - 16 > > > 5th house - 12 > > > 6th house - 10 > > > 7th house - 9 > > > 8th house - 12 > > > 9th house - 24 > > > 10th house - 10 > > > 11th house - 9 > > > 12th house - 9 > > > > > > Thanks > > > Shashank > > > > > > , " sgupta2269 " > > > <sgupta2269@> wrote: > > > > > > > > Ash, > > > > > > > > I realized that the new article is my chart, and the conversation > > > you > > > > and I had in 2004. > > > > > > > > The summary points for my chart that you have on your site are > > > > different from what I get using KAS 3.1.1. With the new version > > of > > > the > > > > program, Mars has less than 12 points in 6th house. > > > > > > > > This has always confused me - in your prediction, the reason you > > > had > > > > mentioned Mars and Merc was that they were two strongest planets > > > for > > > > 6th house. > > > > > > > > Can you please check? > > > > > > > > Shashank > > > > > > > > > > Don't be flakey. Get Mail for Mobile and always stay connected to friends. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 6, 2007 Report Share Posted February 6, 2007 Ash, So, in the new version (soon to be released), the points for Mars in my chart will be what you have on your site. Right? My confusion was not on the merits of KAS but it was on the points for Mars - if it has less than 12 points (which we now know is erroneous), how did you predict the PDF? If Mars has more than 12 points, then there is no confusion. It all fits well. Yes, I do recall our conversations (and with Satish Batas). Ever since you made the prediction (and Satish had made the correct prediction for 16th June, 2004 too using other system), I have studied this system, and used it in many cases, albiet with moderate success. It could be just my lack of practice, though. Over the years, I have become totally convinced that this system works, and works well. I look forward to resuming our conversations to help me become better in this system. Shashank p.s. Satish, hope you are doing well. , " ashsam73 " <ashsam73 wrote: > > Shashank, > > The article is proper and so are the points. I have checked my KAS > program and its tallying with what I have written. > > Yes, I do remember that at that point in time u had said to a friend > of mine that despite the correct prediction that u were not convinced > about KAS :-). > > I also checked my records and I had also predicted the job that u got > on 16th October 2004. That time u had asked me if your contract would > be extended and I had said yes, or if that contract ended u would get > another one as Me-Ma pdf. That was on around 5th October or maybe > prior. The record I have states 5th October 2004. So your contract > ended on 30th sept 2004 and u got a new or started a new contract on > 16th October 2004. > > > I pointing out Me-Ma pdf i.e. 1st contract (when you wrote to list) > > Me and Ma 15-Jun 20-Jun > > > and for your second contract on 16th oct i.e. (u did not acknowledge > that on list) > > Me and Ma 10-Oct 16-Oct > > is not a co-incident. The power of Me and Ma u can see from the points. > > > Granted, that this might have been predicted using the old WS but in > that old WS, the points for Mercury antra and Mars would have been > proper as reflected. > > Its only when we had changed the 12th lord logic which was > misunderstood that this current error might have crept in and that is > also in a very unique case when as in your case 1st lord and 6th lord > is Mars and at the same time 1st points are more than 6th house as in > your case, Mars is with 6 bindus in 1st house and 2 bindus in 6th > house so its more 1st lord and here we do take the aspect as benefical > on 10th and 1st house which is C and A for 6th as B. > > We will release a new copy of the WS, where we had done this change > but somehow did not get transmitted into KAS3.1.1. > > So I want to thank you for bringing pointing this out as it will help all. > > So there is nothing to be confused about in my prediction. It is all > in line, even with old WS it was in line. > > Mars in no way can be weak for you, it is LoB and LoA and it more like > 1st lord so its aspect is to be taken. Ma will aspect benefically > 10th hosue and 1st house thereby increasing the points in the WS. > > It is not co-incidence. However, being convinced about KAS is upto u :-) > > In any case, your chart will help many people understand timing of job > using KAS. > > Cheers !!! > Ash -> http://www.ashtro.ca > > > > , " sgupta2269 " > <sgupta2269@> wrote: > > > > Ash, > > > > I realized that the new article is my chart, and the conversation you > > and I had in 2004. > > > > The summary points for my chart that you have on your site are > > different from what I get using KAS 3.1.1. With the new version of the > > program, Mars has less than 12 points in 6th house. > > > > This has always confused me - in your prediction, the reason you had > > mentioned Mars and Merc was that they were two strongest planets for > > 6th house. > > > > Can you please check? > > > > Shashank > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 6, 2007 Report Share Posted February 6, 2007 Shashank and Ramesh, Actually, KAS3.1.1 works just fine, its only that your chart has brought up a very peculiar case i.e. 1st and 6th lord is Mars and in your particular case Mars points for 1st house is more than that of 6th and here I mean SAV points. So this is a unique case and for some reason I had already programmed this and that is avaiable in my program which I had used to cast your chart and everything seemed all proper, however since my program is more advanced than KAS3.1.1 this particular did not go over into KAS3.1.1 so for all other charts it should work well. Ramesh, in 99% of cases KAS3.1.1 should work just as fine and in my spot checks I did compare my program results with that of KAS3.1.1 and they were all in line. I mean, one thing, this thing baffled me as my program gave the right result and I worked till about 10 p.m EST on this on my own time. This is a free program and even commercial programs that one pays for will not change their code as fast as Donna and Myself are doing. Each time we find out some issue with code, we work on our time and try to fix it up so that it benefits all and this we do from our heart. So, nothing is perfect, however the hope is there to make KAS Program perfect. Sometimes we go to fix one thing and that might broke another. But then such is life in software world. :-) any of the tecchies out there can vouch for what i have said lol..... However, let us not forget and keep those teeth sharpened and on occasion use the Manual calculations. That will highlight more things and will make u think, which is what I did in this case of Shashank. Man that guy makes me work hard lol.... and that too just when i was going to kick back into an ice evening at home with temperatures of -27 degres celcius, I was working up a sweat working at this issue lol... oh well c'est la vie... In any case, Ramesh and Shashank, for now you can use the manual worksheet, and rest assured, that KAS3.1.1 works in most of the cases so need not worry. We shall have a new version of KAS out, which will include this, which incidentally was done but did not get transmitted, and now will in the new version. Give, Donna a break, she has been working round the clock too. Cheers !!! Ash -> http://www.ashtro.ca , " sgupta2269 " <sgupta2269 wrote: > > Ash, > > So, in the new version (soon to be released), the points for Mars in > my chart will be what you have on your site. Right? > > My confusion was not on the merits of KAS but it was on the points > for Mars - if it has less than 12 points (which we now know is > erroneous), how did you predict the PDF? > > If Mars has more than 12 points, then there is no confusion. It all > fits well. > > Yes, I do recall our conversations (and with Satish Batas). Ever > since you made the prediction (and Satish had made the correct > prediction for 16th June, 2004 too using other system), I have > studied this system, and used it in many cases, albiet with moderate > success. It could be just my lack of practice, though. Over the > years, I have become totally convinced that this system works, and > works well. > > I look forward to resuming our conversations to help me become better > in this system. > > Shashank > > p.s. Satish, hope you are doing well. > > > , " ashsam73 " > <ashsam73@> wrote: > > > > Shashank, > > > > The article is proper and so are the points. I have checked my KAS > > program and its tallying with what I have written. > > > > Yes, I do remember that at that point in time u had said to a friend > > of mine that despite the correct prediction that u were not > convinced > > about KAS :-). > > > > I also checked my records and I had also predicted the job that u > got > > on 16th October 2004. That time u had asked me if your contract > would > > be extended and I had said yes, or if that contract ended u would > get > > another one as Me-Ma pdf. That was on around 5th October or maybe > > prior. The record I have states 5th October 2004. So your contract > > ended on 30th sept 2004 and u got a new or started a new contract on > > 16th October 2004. > > > > > > I pointing out Me-Ma pdf i.e. 1st contract (when you wrote to list) > > > > Me and Ma 15-Jun 20-Jun > > > > > > and for your second contract on 16th oct i.e. (u did not > acknowledge > > that on list) > > > > Me and Ma 10-Oct 16-Oct > > > > is not a co-incident. The power of Me and Ma u can see from the > points. > > > > > > Granted, that this might have been predicted using the old WS but in > > that old WS, the points for Mercury antra and Mars would have been > > proper as reflected. > > > > Its only when we had changed the 12th lord logic which was > > misunderstood that this current error might have crept in and that > is > > also in a very unique case when as in your case 1st lord and 6th > lord > > is Mars and at the same time 1st points are more than 6th house as > in > > your case, Mars is with 6 bindus in 1st house and 2 bindus in 6th > > house so its more 1st lord and here we do take the aspect as > benefical > > on 10th and 1st house which is C and A for 6th as B. > > > > We will release a new copy of the WS, where we had done this change > > but somehow did not get transmitted into KAS3.1.1. > > > > So I want to thank you for bringing pointing this out as it will > help all. > > > > So there is nothing to be confused about in my prediction. It is > all > > in line, even with old WS it was in line. > > > > Mars in no way can be weak for you, it is LoB and LoA and it more > like > > 1st lord so its aspect is to be taken. Ma will aspect benefically > > 10th hosue and 1st house thereby increasing the points in the WS. > > > > It is not co-incidence. However, being convinced about KAS is upto > u :-) > > > > In any case, your chart will help many people understand timing of > job > > using KAS. > > > > Cheers !!! > > Ash -> http://www.ashtro.ca > > > > > > > > , " sgupta2269 " > > <sgupta2269@> wrote: > > > > > > Ash, > > > > > > I realized that the new article is my chart, and the conversation > you > > > and I had in 2004. > > > > > > The summary points for my chart that you have on your site are > > > different from what I get using KAS 3.1.1. With the new version > of the > > > program, Mars has less than 12 points in 6th house. > > > > > > This has always confused me - in your prediction, the reason you > had > > > mentioned Mars and Merc was that they were two strongest planets > for > > > 6th house. > > > > > > Can you please check? > > > > > > Shashank > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 6, 2007 Report Share Posted February 6, 2007 Ash, If it makes you feel better, Chicago had similar temperature last night. And, I was busy doing the calculations manually!!! How quickly we get used to the new spreadsheets, programs ... and forget the manual calculations!!! Shashank , " ashsam73 " <ashsam73 wrote: > > Shashank and Ramesh, > > Actually, KAS3.1.1 works just fine, its only that your chart has > brought up a very peculiar case i.e. 1st and 6th lord is Mars and in > your particular case Mars points for 1st house is more than that of > 6th and here I mean SAV points. > So this is a unique case and for some reason I had already programmed > this and that is avaiable in my program which I had used to cast your > chart and everything seemed all proper, however since my program is > more advanced than KAS3.1.1 this particular did not go over into > KAS3.1.1 so for all other charts it should work well. > > Ramesh, in 99% of cases KAS3.1.1 should work just as fine and in my > spot checks I did compare my program results with that of KAS3.1.1 and > they were all in line. > > I mean, one thing, this thing baffled me as my program gave the right > result and I worked till about 10 p.m EST on this on my own time. > > This is a free program and even commercial programs that one pays for > will not change their code as fast as Donna and Myself are doing. > > Each time we find out some issue with code, we work on our time and > try to fix it up so that it benefits all and this we do from our heart. > > So, nothing is perfect, however the hope is there to make KAS Program > perfect. > > Sometimes we go to fix one thing and that might broke another. But > then such is life in software world. :-) any of the tecchies out there > can vouch for what i have said lol..... > > However, let us not forget and keep those teeth sharpened and on > occasion use the Manual calculations. That will highlight more things > and will make u think, which is what I did in this case of Shashank. > Man that guy makes me work hard lol.... and that too just when i was > going to kick back into an ice evening at home with temperatures of > -27 degres celcius, I was working up a sweat working at this issue > lol... oh well c'est la vie... > > In any case, Ramesh and Shashank, for now you can use the manual > worksheet, and rest assured, that KAS3.1.1 works in most of the cases > so need not worry. > > We shall have a new version of KAS out, which will include this, which > incidentally was done but did not get transmitted, and now will in the > new version. > > Give, Donna a break, she has been working round the clock too. > > Cheers !!! > Ash -> http://www.ashtro.ca > > , " sgupta2269 " > <sgupta2269@> wrote: > > > > Ash, > > > > So, in the new version (soon to be released), the points for Mars in > > my chart will be what you have on your site. Right? > > > > My confusion was not on the merits of KAS but it was on the points > > for Mars - if it has less than 12 points (which we now know is > > erroneous), how did you predict the PDF? > > > > If Mars has more than 12 points, then there is no confusion. It all > > fits well. > > > > Yes, I do recall our conversations (and with Satish Batas). Ever > > since you made the prediction (and Satish had made the correct > > prediction for 16th June, 2004 too using other system), I have > > studied this system, and used it in many cases, albiet with moderate > > success. It could be just my lack of practice, though. Over the > > years, I have become totally convinced that this system works, and > > works well. > > > > I look forward to resuming our conversations to help me become better > > in this system. > > > > Shashank > > > > p.s. Satish, hope you are doing well. > > > > > > , " ashsam73 " > > <ashsam73@> wrote: > > > > > > Shashank, > > > > > > The article is proper and so are the points. I have checked my KAS > > > program and its tallying with what I have written. > > > > > > Yes, I do remember that at that point in time u had said to a friend > > > of mine that despite the correct prediction that u were not > > convinced > > > about KAS :-). > > > > > > I also checked my records and I had also predicted the job that u > > got > > > on 16th October 2004. That time u had asked me if your contract > > would > > > be extended and I had said yes, or if that contract ended u would > > get > > > another one as Me-Ma pdf. That was on around 5th October or maybe > > > prior. The record I have states 5th October 2004. So your contract > > > ended on 30th sept 2004 and u got a new or started a new contract on > > > 16th October 2004. > > > > > > > > > I pointing out Me-Ma pdf i.e. 1st contract (when you wrote to list) > > > > > > Me and Ma 15-Jun 20-Jun > > > > > > > > > and for your second contract on 16th oct i.e. (u did not > > acknowledge > > > that on list) > > > > > > Me and Ma 10-Oct 16-Oct > > > > > > is not a co-incident. The power of Me and Ma u can see from the > > points. > > > > > > > > > Granted, that this might have been predicted using the old WS but in > > > that old WS, the points for Mercury antra and Mars would have been > > > proper as reflected. > > > > > > Its only when we had changed the 12th lord logic which was > > > misunderstood that this current error might have crept in and that > > is > > > also in a very unique case when as in your case 1st lord and 6th > > lord > > > is Mars and at the same time 1st points are more than 6th house as > > in > > > your case, Mars is with 6 bindus in 1st house and 2 bindus in 6th > > > house so its more 1st lord and here we do take the aspect as > > benefical > > > on 10th and 1st house which is C and A for 6th as B. > > > > > > We will release a new copy of the WS, where we had done this change > > > but somehow did not get transmitted into KAS3.1.1. > > > > > > So I want to thank you for bringing pointing this out as it will > > help all. > > > > > > So there is nothing to be confused about in my prediction. It is > > all > > > in line, even with old WS it was in line. > > > > > > Mars in no way can be weak for you, it is LoB and LoA and it more > > like > > > 1st lord so its aspect is to be taken. Ma will aspect benefically > > > 10th hosue and 1st house thereby increasing the points in the WS. > > > > > > It is not co-incidence. However, being convinced about KAS is upto > > u :-) > > > > > > In any case, your chart will help many people understand timing of > > job > > > using KAS. > > > > > > Cheers !!! > > > Ash -> http://www.ashtro.ca > > > > > > > > > > > > , " sgupta2269 " > > > <sgupta2269@> wrote: > > > > > > > > Ash, > > > > > > > > I realized that the new article is my chart, and the conversation > > you > > > > and I had in 2004. > > > > > > > > The summary points for my chart that you have on your site are > > > > different from what I get using KAS 3.1.1. With the new version > > of the > > > > program, Mars has less than 12 points in 6th house. > > > > > > > > This has always confused me - in your prediction, the reason you > > had > > > > mentioned Mars and Merc was that they were two strongest planets > > for > > > > 6th house. > > > > > > > > Can you please check? > > > > > > > > Shashank > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 6, 2007 Report Share Posted February 6, 2007 Shashank, I have already replied to this. In the old program, that I used in Feb 2004, did compute your Mars correctly. So that is why I have predicted the pdf. I have given that in my mail. Just check the power of Mars and Mercury on my website and I think u will get the answer. Cheers !!! Ash -> http://www.ashtro.ca , " sgupta2269 " <sgupta2269 wrote: > > Ash, > > So, in the new version (soon to be released), the points for Mars in > my chart will be what you have on your site. Right? > > My confusion was not on the merits of KAS but it was on the points > for Mars - if it has less than 12 points (which we now know is > erroneous), how did you predict the PDF? > > If Mars has more than 12 points, then there is no confusion. It all > fits well. > > Yes, I do recall our conversations (and with Satish Batas). Ever > since you made the prediction (and Satish had made the correct > prediction for 16th June, 2004 too using other system), I have > studied this system, and used it in many cases, albiet with moderate > success. It could be just my lack of practice, though. Over the > years, I have become totally convinced that this system works, and > works well. > > I look forward to resuming our conversations to help me become better > in this system. > > Shashank > > p.s. Satish, hope you are doing well. > > > , " ashsam73 " > <ashsam73@> wrote: > > > > Shashank, > > > > The article is proper and so are the points. I have checked my KAS > > program and its tallying with what I have written. > > > > Yes, I do remember that at that point in time u had said to a friend > > of mine that despite the correct prediction that u were not > convinced > > about KAS :-). > > > > I also checked my records and I had also predicted the job that u > got > > on 16th October 2004. That time u had asked me if your contract > would > > be extended and I had said yes, or if that contract ended u would > get > > another one as Me-Ma pdf. That was on around 5th October or maybe > > prior. The record I have states 5th October 2004. So your contract > > ended on 30th sept 2004 and u got a new or started a new contract on > > 16th October 2004. > > > > > > I pointing out Me-Ma pdf i.e. 1st contract (when you wrote to list) > > > > Me and Ma 15-Jun 20-Jun > > > > > > and for your second contract on 16th oct i.e. (u did not > acknowledge > > that on list) > > > > Me and Ma 10-Oct 16-Oct > > > > is not a co-incident. The power of Me and Ma u can see from the > points. > > > > > > Granted, that this might have been predicted using the old WS but in > > that old WS, the points for Mercury antra and Mars would have been > > proper as reflected. > > > > Its only when we had changed the 12th lord logic which was > > misunderstood that this current error might have crept in and that > is > > also in a very unique case when as in your case 1st lord and 6th > lord > > is Mars and at the same time 1st points are more than 6th house as > in > > your case, Mars is with 6 bindus in 1st house and 2 bindus in 6th > > house so its more 1st lord and here we do take the aspect as > benefical > > on 10th and 1st house which is C and A for 6th as B. > > > > We will release a new copy of the WS, where we had done this change > > but somehow did not get transmitted into KAS3.1.1. > > > > So I want to thank you for bringing pointing this out as it will > help all. > > > > So there is nothing to be confused about in my prediction. It is > all > > in line, even with old WS it was in line. > > > > Mars in no way can be weak for you, it is LoB and LoA and it more > like > > 1st lord so its aspect is to be taken. Ma will aspect benefically > > 10th hosue and 1st house thereby increasing the points in the WS. > > > > It is not co-incidence. However, being convinced about KAS is upto > u :-) > > > > In any case, your chart will help many people understand timing of > job > > using KAS. > > > > Cheers !!! > > Ash -> http://www.ashtro.ca > > > > > > > > , " sgupta2269 " > > <sgupta2269@> wrote: > > > > > > Ash, > > > > > > I realized that the new article is my chart, and the conversation > you > > > and I had in 2004. > > > > > > The summary points for my chart that you have on your site are > > > different from what I get using KAS 3.1.1. With the new version > of the > > > program, Mars has less than 12 points in 6th house. > > > > > > This has always confused me - in your prediction, the reason you > had > > > mentioned Mars and Merc was that they were two strongest planets > for > > > 6th house. > > > > > > Can you please check? > > > > > > Shashank > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.