Guest guest Posted April 16, 2007 Report Share Posted April 16, 2007 Hi all, The following is a data of one of my cousins. She is 32 years old now and still not married. I don't get an unmarrital state. The fk and Nk are not that spoilt either. Here are the details: 22 Nov 1974 13:40 PM 13N5 and 80E13. I tried changing from Aquarius lagna to Pisces but that did not help. All her delays get over 2002, both Sa and Ju. I don't understand why Sa being LOD and with 31 points for H7 could not give marriage. I am sure I am missing something. If someone could point out that would be great! Thanks, Sindhu Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 17, 2007 Report Share Posted April 17, 2007 Dear Sindu, I observed the following combinations.Probably these may be the reason for delaying. But I am not sure. You are correct that delay caused by Sa and Ju both ends on 31 May 2000 (when lagna is Aq) during Ju- Ra. Sa antara in Sa main should have given marriage. The fact is, it did not do so. 1. No blessings in the chart.Lagna lord and 9th lord is in 6/8 both in rasi and navamsa. 2. Full delay by Sa and Ju both. 3.No moderation of delay. 4.Su to Ve distance is only 3 deg 55 min. so Ve is weak and combust. Ve is very close to Su. This might be one of the reason. Remember Ve is NK for 7th. Ju the FK is in 12th from its karaksthaan and makes relationship with 6th lord Mo.Though Mo is not considered as effect of 6th however it effects the relationship of marriage. Mo also has made relationship with LoA, LoC and house B.Mo is also in the 4th place from LoB Su. Mo is strong with 5 bindus in lagna and aspects house B. This might be another reason. 5.From Asc and Mo the relation between lagna and its 7th is 6:8. and from that of Su is 2/12. This might be third reason for enhancing the delay.The native gets only 5 points out of 100 point. Therefore taking all abovementioned factors into account it has come to the conclusion that delay is further enhanced. Now the native is running through Me antara in Sa main. Next antara of Ke may be fruitful for her and she may be married during third sector of Ke antara. Probable period might be Jan/2009 and May/2009. May GOD bless her in first sector. Thanks and regards. Ramesh Mishra Sindhu Iyer <sindhu_iyer wrote: Hi all, The following is a data of one of my cousins. She is 32 years old now and still not married. I don't get an unmarrital state. The fk and Nk are not that spoilt either. Here are the details: 22 Nov 1974 13:40 PM 13N5 and 80E13. I tried changing from Aquarius lagna to Pisces but that did not help. All her delays get over 2002, both Sa and Ju. I don't understand why Sa being LOD and with 31 points for H7 could not give marriage. I am sure I am missing something. If someone could point out that would be great! Thanks, Sindhu Check out what you're missing if you're not on Messenger Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 17, 2007 Report Share Posted April 17, 2007 Dear Sindhu, I observed the following combinations.Probably these may be the reason for delaying. But I am not sure. You are correct that delay caused by Sa and Ju both ends on 31 May 2000 (when lagna is Aq) during Ju- Ra. Sa antara in Sa main should have given marriage. The fact is, it did not do so. 1. No blessings in the chart.Lagna lord and 9th lord is in 6/8 both in rasi and navamsa. 2. Full delay by Sa and Ju both. 3.No moderation of delay. 4.Su to Ve distance is only 3 deg 55 min. so Ve is weak and combust. Ve is very close to Su. This might be one of the reason. Remember Ve is NK for 7th. Ju the FK is in 12th from its karaksthaan and makes relationship with 6th lord Mo.Though Mo is not considered as effect of 6th however it effects the relationship of marriage. Mo also has made relationship with LoA, LoC and house B.Mo is also in the 4th place from LoB Su. Mo is strong with 5 bindus in lagna and aspects house B. This might be another reason. 5.From Asc and Mo the relation between lagna and its 7th is 6:8. and from that of Su is 2/12. This might be third reason for enhancing the delay.The native gets only 5 points out of 100 point. Therefore taking all abovementioned factors into account it has come to the conclusion that delay is further enhanced. Now the native is running through Me antara in Sa main. Next antara of Ke may be fruitful for her and she may be married during third sector of Ke antara. Probable period might be Jan/2009 and May/2009. May GOD bless her in first sector. Thanks and regards. Ramesh Mishra Sindhu Iyer <sindhu_iyer wrote: Hi all, The following is a data of one of my cousins. She is 32 years old now and still not married. I don't get an unmarrital state. The fk and Nk are not that spoilt either. Here are the details: 22 Nov 1974 13:40 PM 13N5 and 80E13. I tried changing from Aquarius lagna to Pisces but that did not help. All her delays get over 2002, both Sa and Ju. I don't understand why Sa being LOD and with 31 points for H7 could not give marriage. I am sure I am missing something. If someone could point out that would be great! Thanks, Sindhu Check out what you're missing if you're not on Messenger Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 17, 2007 Report Share Posted April 17, 2007 Dear All, This American lady is now 59 years old. She married at age of 18 and remained in her marriage for 19-20 years. Then was her choice to end marriage by divorce --- her husband was devastated! Now she has been unmarried for 20 years. For first 10 years after her divorce she was almost obsessive to remarry. But for past 10 years has had very little interest in opposite sex and has been totally celibate -- in fact past 10 years most aspects of her life have not gone well at all. Could group please review and reach conclusion regarding obstructions, etc?? Her birth details: January 9, 1948 8:30 p.m. Clarkesville, GA, USA 83W32 34N37 Lagna: Leo 2:41 Thanks, Joyce - Sindhu Iyer Tuesday, April 17, 2007 12:23 AM Re: ReAnother marriage chart Hi all, The following is a data of one of my cousins. She is 32 years old now and still not married. I don't get an unmarrital state. The fk and Nk are not that spoilt either. Here are the details: 22 Nov 1974 13:40 PM 13N5 and 80E13. I tried changing from Aquarius lagna to Pisces but that did not help. All her delays get over 2002, both Sa and Ju. I don't understand why Sa being LOD and with 31 points for H7 could not give marriage. I am sure I am missing something. If someone could point out that would be great! Thanks, Sindhu ---------- -- Version: 7.5.446 / Virus Database: 269.5.1/764 - Release 4/17/07 4:43 AM Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 17, 2007 Report Share Posted April 17, 2007 Hello Joyce, As you said she married at the age of 18.It means did she marry sometime between Mar/1966 and Mar/1967. She has blesings of guru and father. Her chart is showing full delay. May be owing to blessings she might have married so early that too being in culture of western style. If so then she married in the antara of Me and Ve main period. Both these planets are in 6th house which indicates thrift in married life. In navamsa also Ve is in 6th and Me in the navamsa of Sa the 6th lord of rasi. I will go further after getting her marriage date. Thanks and regards. Ramesh Mishra Joyce Collins <joycecollins wrote: Dear All, This American lady is now 59 years old. She married at age of 18 and remained in her marriage for 19-20 years. Then was her choice to end marriage by divorce --- her husband was devastated! Now she has been unmarried for 20 years. For first 10 years after her divorce she was almost obsessive to remarry. But for past 10 years has had very little interest in opposite sex and has been totally celibate -- in fact past 10 years most aspects of her life have not gone well at all. Could group please review and reach conclusion regarding obstructions, etc?? Her birth details: January 9, 1948 8:30 p.m. Clarkesville, GA, USA 83W32 34N37 Lagna: Leo 2:41 Thanks, Joyce - Sindhu Iyer Tuesday, April 17, 2007 12:23 AM Re: ReAnother marriage chart Hi all, The following is a data of one of my cousins. She is 32 years old now and still not married. I don't get an unmarrital state. The fk and Nk are not that spoilt either. Here are the details: 22 Nov 1974 13:40 PM 13N5 and 80E13. I tried changing from Aquarius lagna to Pisces but that did not help. All her delays get over 2002, both Sa and Ju. I don't understand why Sa being LOD and with 31 points for H7 could not give marriage. I am sure I am missing something. If someone could point out that would be great! Thanks, Sindhu ------------------------- -- Version: 7.5.446 / Virus Database: 269.5.1/764 - Release 4/17/07 4:43 AM Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 17, 2007 Report Share Posted April 17, 2007 Dear Ramesh and All, Her marriage was in January 23, 1966. She had 1st child in October, 1967. Second child February, 1969. Third child in April, 1971. Marriage ended legally in August 23, 1985. There was a traumatic event in the marriage in April, 1985 that involved gun shots (no injuries) and overnight incarceration of husband and subsequent transfer of him to short stay in mental hospital. She has much pride in children and rightly so --- all are successful, happy, well adjusted adults with happy marriages. By her own admission, she experienced " great love " with numerous partners during the ten years immediately after her marriage ended , but none of these resulted in marriage. She apparently could have chosen to marry at least 2 - 3 times, but did not receive " proposals " from the 2 - 3 " prospects " that she found " acceptable ---- however mostly was " too critical " and " pickie " ! Thanks! Joyce - ramesh mishra Tuesday, April 17, 2007 10:54 AM Re: ReAnother marriage chart Hello Joyce, As you said she married at the age of 18.It means did she marry sometime between Mar/1966 and Mar/1967. She has blesings of guru and father. Her chart is showing full delay. May be owing to blessings she might have married so early that too being in culture of western style. If so then she married in the antara of Me and Ve main period. Both these planets are in 6th house which indicates thrift in married life. In navamsa also Ve is in 6th and Me in the navamsa of Sa the 6th lord of rasi. I will go further after getting her marriage date. Thanks and regards. Ramesh Mishra Joyce Collins <joycecollins wrote: Dear All, This American lady is now 59 years old. She married at age of 18 and remained in her marriage for 19-20 years. Then was her choice to end marriage by divorce --- her husband was devastated! Now she has been unmarried for 20 years. For first 10 years after her divorce she was almost obsessive to remarry. But for past 10 years has had very little interest in opposite sex and has been totally celibate -- in fact past 10 years most aspects of her life have not gone well at all. Could group please review and reach conclusion regarding obstructions, etc?? Her birth details: January 9, 1948 8:30 p.m. Clarkesville, GA, USA 83W32 34N37 Lagna: Leo 2:41 Thanks, Joyce - Sindhu Iyer Tuesday, April 17, 2007 12:23 AM Re: ReAnother marriage chart Hi all, The following is a data of one of my cousins. She is 32 years old now and still not married. I don't get an unmarrital state. The fk and Nk are not that spoilt either. Here are the details: 22 Nov 1974 13:40 PM 13N5 and 80E13. I tried changing from Aquarius lagna to Pisces but that did not help. All her delays get over 2002, both Sa and Ju. I don't understand why Sa being LOD and with 31 points for H7 could not give marriage. I am sure I am missing something. If someone could point out that would be great! Thanks, Sindhu ------------------------- -- Version: 7.5.446 / Virus Database: 269.5.1/764 - Release 4/17/07 4:43 AM Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 18, 2007 Report Share Posted April 18, 2007 --- Sindhu Iyer <sindhu_iyer wrote: > Dear Ramesh,Anup,Ash and others, > Can you please explain to me why you think Mercury > antara cannot give the result. Mercury has enough > points for 7th and not aspecting A,B or C. Why not > mercury? I still last sector of Mercury can do the > job > unless I am not seeing something seemingly obvious > > Waiting for results on the previous quiz from Ash > too! > > > --Thanks in advance > Sindhu > > > --- ramesh mishra <aarceemastro2002 > wrote: > > > Dear Sindu, > > I observed the following combinations.Probably > > these may be the reason for delaying. But I am not > > sure. > > You are correct that delay caused by Sa and Ju > > both ends on 31 May 2000 (when lagna is Aq) during > > Ju- Ra. > > Sa antara in Sa main should have given marriage. > > The fact is, it did not do so. > > 1. No blessings in the chart.Lagna lord and 9th > > lord is in 6/8 both in rasi and navamsa. > > 2. Full delay by Sa and Ju both. > > 3.No moderation of delay. > > 4.Su to Ve distance is only 3 deg 55 min. so Ve > is > > weak and combust. Ve is very close to Su. This > might > > be one of the reason. Remember Ve is NK for 7th. > > Ju the FK is in 12th from its karaksthaan and > > makes relationship with 6th lord Mo.Though Mo is > not > > considered as effect of 6th however it effects the > > relationship of marriage. > > Mo also has made relationship with LoA, LoC and > > house B.Mo is also in the 4th place from LoB Su. > Mo > > is strong with 5 bindus in lagna and aspects house > > B. > > This might be another reason. > > 5.From Asc and Mo the relation between lagna and > > its 7th is 6:8. > > and from that of Su is 2/12. This might be third > > reason for enhancing the delay.The native gets > only > > 5 points out of 100 point. > > Therefore taking all abovementioned factors into > > account it has come to the conclusion that delay > is > > further enhanced. > > Now the native is running through Me antara in > Sa > > main. > > Next antara of Ke may be fruitful for her and > she > > may be married during third sector of Ke antara. > > Probable period might be Jan/2009 and May/2009. > > May GOD bless her in first sector. > > Thanks and regards. > > Ramesh Mishra > > > > Sindhu Iyer <sindhu_iyer wrote: > > Hi all, > > The following is a data of one of my cousins. She > is > > 32 years old now and still not married. I don't > get > > an unmarrital state. The fk and Nk are not that > > spoilt > > either. > > > > Here are the details: > > 22 Nov 1974 > > 13:40 PM > > 13N5 and 80E13. > > > > I tried changing from Aquarius lagna to Pisces but > > that did not help. All her delays get over 2002, > > both > > Sa and Ju. > > > > I don't understand why Sa being LOD and with 31 > > points > > for H7 could not give marriage. I am sure I am > > missing > > something. If someone could point out that would > be > > great! > > > > Thanks, > > Sindhu > > > > > > > > Tired of spam? Mail has the best spam > > protection around > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Check out what you're missing if you're not on > > Messenger > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been > > removed] > > > > > > > > > Tired of spam? Mail has the best spam > protection around > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 18, 2007 Report Share Posted April 18, 2007 Dear Sindhu, The marriage of previous quiz was in Dec 12th 1999. Marriage was at 24.24 years of age. Is that possible with Sa in 5th in navamsa? After rectification of the chart and a discussion the event is better explained by Sco lagna. Ramesh had also reached the similar conclusion. Cheers !!! Ash -> http://www.ashtro.ca , Sindhu Iyer <sindhu_iyer wrote: > > > --- Sindhu Iyer <sindhu_iyer wrote: > > > Dear Ramesh,Anup,Ash and others, > > Can you please explain to me why you think Mercury > > antara cannot give the result. Mercury has enough > > points for 7th and not aspecting A,B or C. Why not > > mercury? I still last sector of Mercury can do the > > job > > unless I am not seeing something seemingly obvious > > > > Waiting for results on the previous quiz from Ash > > too! > > > > > > --Thanks in advance > > Sindhu > > > > > > --- ramesh mishra <aarceemastro2002 > > wrote: > > > > > Dear Sindu, > > > I observed the following combinations.Probably > > > these may be the reason for delaying. But I am not > > > sure. > > > You are correct that delay caused by Sa and Ju > > > both ends on 31 May 2000 (when lagna is Aq) during > > > Ju- Ra. > > > Sa antara in Sa main should have given marriage. > > > The fact is, it did not do so. > > > 1. No blessings in the chart.Lagna lord and 9th > > > lord is in 6/8 both in rasi and navamsa. > > > 2. Full delay by Sa and Ju both. > > > 3.No moderation of delay. > > > 4.Su to Ve distance is only 3 deg 55 min. so Ve > > is > > > weak and combust. Ve is very close to Su. This > > might > > > be one of the reason. Remember Ve is NK for 7th. > > > Ju the FK is in 12th from its karaksthaan and > > > makes relationship with 6th lord Mo.Though Mo is > > not > > > considered as effect of 6th however it effects the > > > relationship of marriage. > > > Mo also has made relationship with LoA, LoC and > > > house B.Mo is also in the 4th place from LoB Su. > > Mo > > > is strong with 5 bindus in lagna and aspects house > > > B. > > > This might be another reason. > > > 5.From Asc and Mo the relation between lagna and > > > its 7th is 6:8. > > > and from that of Su is 2/12. This might be third > > > reason for enhancing the delay.The native gets > > only > > > 5 points out of 100 point. > > > Therefore taking all abovementioned factors into > > > account it has come to the conclusion that delay > > is > > > further enhanced. > > > Now the native is running through Me antara in > > Sa > > > main. > > > Next antara of Ke may be fruitful for her and > > she > > > may be married during third sector of Ke antara. > > > Probable period might be Jan/2009 and May/2009. > > > May GOD bless her in first sector. > > > Thanks and regards. > > > Ramesh Mishra > > > > > > Sindhu Iyer <sindhu_iyer wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > The following is a data of one of my cousins. She > > is > > > 32 years old now and still not married. I don't > > get > > > an unmarrital state. The fk and Nk are not that > > > spoilt > > > either. > > > > > > Here are the details: > > > 22 Nov 1974 > > > 13:40 PM > > > 13N5 and 80E13. > > > > > > I tried changing from Aquarius lagna to Pisces but > > > that did not help. All her delays get over 2002, > > > both > > > Sa and Ju. > > > > > > I don't understand why Sa being LOD and with 31 > > > points > > > for H7 could not give marriage. I am sure I am > > > missing > > > something. If someone could point out that would > > be > > > great! > > > > > > Thanks, > > > Sindhu > > > > > > > > > > > > Tired of spam? Mail has the best spam > > > protection around > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Check out what you're missing if you're not on > > > Messenger > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been > > > removed] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Tired of spam? Mail has the best spam > > protection around > > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 18, 2007 Report Share Posted April 18, 2007 Dear Sindhu, Yes, I do not want to go into too much detail in this chart. Me is LoE for 12th and its placed in House D and its with 3 bindus. This is a good time for her in her job. Me 3rd sector is good for her to meet someone. She must get over her ex. So this might be the period. So lets hope in 3rd sector of Mercury she is open and receptive to marriage. So more chances after Oct this year. Keep me posted on the progress. Next antra is that of Ke who is SD to Ve and Mo. Ve is powerful and Mo aspects 7th house so Ke can come forward as well being in House D. She also might travel during this period or lets say that this Me antra is very good for her job and she might travel abroad as well. Cheers !!! Ash -> http://www.ashtro.ca , Sindhu Iyer <sindhu_iyer wrote: > > > --- Sindhu Iyer <sindhu_iyer wrote: > > > Dear Ramesh,Anup,Ash and others, > > Can you please explain to me why you think Mercury > > antara cannot give the result. Mercury has enough > > points for 7th and not aspecting A,B or C. Why not > > mercury? I still last sector of Mercury can do the > > job > > unless I am not seeing something seemingly obvious > > > > Waiting for results on the previous quiz from Ash > > too! > > > > > > --Thanks in advance > > Sindhu > > > > > > --- ramesh mishra <aarceemastro2002 > > wrote: > > > > > Dear Sindu, > > > I observed the following combinations.Probably > > > these may be the reason for delaying. But I am not > > > sure. > > > You are correct that delay caused by Sa and Ju > > > both ends on 31 May 2000 (when lagna is Aq) during > > > Ju- Ra. > > > Sa antara in Sa main should have given marriage. > > > The fact is, it did not do so. > > > 1. No blessings in the chart.Lagna lord and 9th > > > lord is in 6/8 both in rasi and navamsa. > > > 2. Full delay by Sa and Ju both. > > > 3.No moderation of delay. > > > 4.Su to Ve distance is only 3 deg 55 min. so Ve > > is > > > weak and combust. Ve is very close to Su. This > > might > > > be one of the reason. Remember Ve is NK for 7th. > > > Ju the FK is in 12th from its karaksthaan and > > > makes relationship with 6th lord Mo.Though Mo is > > not > > > considered as effect of 6th however it effects the > > > relationship of marriage. > > > Mo also has made relationship with LoA, LoC and > > > house B.Mo is also in the 4th place from LoB Su. > > Mo > > > is strong with 5 bindus in lagna and aspects house > > > B. > > > This might be another reason. > > > 5.From Asc and Mo the relation between lagna and > > > its 7th is 6:8. > > > and from that of Su is 2/12. This might be third > > > reason for enhancing the delay.The native gets > > only > > > 5 points out of 100 point. > > > Therefore taking all abovementioned factors into > > > account it has come to the conclusion that delay > > is > > > further enhanced. > > > Now the native is running through Me antara in > > Sa > > > main. > > > Next antara of Ke may be fruitful for her and > > she > > > may be married during third sector of Ke antara. > > > Probable period might be Jan/2009 and May/2009. > > > May GOD bless her in first sector. > > > Thanks and regards. > > > Ramesh Mishra > > > > > > Sindhu Iyer <sindhu_iyer wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > The following is a data of one of my cousins. She > > is > > > 32 years old now and still not married. I don't > > get > > > an unmarrital state. The fk and Nk are not that > > > spoilt > > > either. > > > > > > Here are the details: > > > 22 Nov 1974 > > > 13:40 PM > > > 13N5 and 80E13. > > > > > > I tried changing from Aquarius lagna to Pisces but > > > that did not help. All her delays get over 2002, > > > both > > > Sa and Ju. > > > > > > I don't understand why Sa being LOD and with 31 > > > points > > > for H7 could not give marriage. I am sure I am > > > missing > > > something. If someone could point out that would > > be > > > great! > > > > > > Thanks, > > > Sindhu > > > > > > > > > > > > Tired of spam? Mail has the best spam > > > protection around > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Check out what you're missing if you're not on > > > Messenger > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been > > > removed] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Tired of spam? Mail has the best spam > > protection around > > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 18, 2007 Report Share Posted April 18, 2007 Dear Ash, Thank you once again. I see the mistake I did, I kept the lagna to be Sagitarius and moved the clock so that the navamsa lagna changed and SA was not in the 5th hosue of Navamsa. Next time I will pay better attention to the instructions! Thank you again, Sindhu --- ashsam73 <ashsam73 wrote: > Dear Sindhu, > > The marriage of previous quiz was in Dec 12th 1999. > Marriage was at > 24.24 years of age. > > Is that possible with Sa in 5th in navamsa? > > After rectification of the chart and a discussion > the event is better > explained by Sco lagna. > > Ramesh had also reached the similar conclusion. > > Cheers !!! > Ash -> http://www.ashtro.ca > > , > Sindhu Iyer > <sindhu_iyer wrote: > > > > > > --- Sindhu Iyer <sindhu_iyer wrote: > > > > > Dear Ramesh,Anup,Ash and others, > > > Can you please explain to me why you think > Mercury > > > antara cannot give the result. Mercury has > enough > > > points for 7th and not aspecting A,B or C. Why > not > > > mercury? I still last sector of Mercury can do > the > > > job > > > unless I am not seeing something seemingly > obvious > > > > > > Waiting for results on the previous quiz from > Ash > > > too! > > > > > > > > > --Thanks in advance > > > Sindhu > > > > > > > > > --- ramesh mishra <aarceemastro2002 > > > wrote: > > > > > > > Dear Sindu, > > > > I observed the following > combinations.Probably > > > > these may be the reason for delaying. But I am > not > > > > sure. > > > > You are correct that delay caused by Sa and > Ju > > > > both ends on 31 May 2000 (when lagna is Aq) > during > > > > Ju- Ra. > > > > Sa antara in Sa main should have given > marriage. > > > > The fact is, it did not do so. > > > > 1. No blessings in the chart.Lagna lord and > 9th > > > > lord is in 6/8 both in rasi and navamsa. > > > > 2. Full delay by Sa and Ju both. > > > > 3.No moderation of delay. > > > > 4.Su to Ve distance is only 3 deg 55 min. so > Ve > > > is > > > > weak and combust. Ve is very close to Su. This > > > might > > > > be one of the reason. Remember Ve is NK for > 7th. > > > > Ju the FK is in 12th from its karaksthaan > and > > > > makes relationship with 6th lord Mo.Though Mo > is > > > not > > > > considered as effect of 6th however it effects > the > > > > relationship of marriage. > > > > Mo also has made relationship with LoA, LoC > and > > > > house B.Mo is also in the 4th place from LoB > Su. > > > Mo > > > > is strong with 5 bindus in lagna and aspects > house > > > > B. > > > > This might be another reason. > > > > 5.From Asc and Mo the relation between lagna > and > > > > its 7th is 6:8. > > > > and from that of Su is 2/12. This might be > third > > > > reason for enhancing the delay.The native gets > > > only > > > > 5 points out of 100 point. > > > > Therefore taking all abovementioned factors > into > > > > account it has come to the conclusion that > delay > > > is > > > > further enhanced. > > > > Now the native is running through Me antara > in > > > Sa > > > > main. > > > > Next antara of Ke may be fruitful for her > and > > > she > > > > may be married during third sector of Ke > antara. > > > > Probable period might be Jan/2009 and > May/2009. > > > > May GOD bless her in first sector. > > > > Thanks and regards. > > > > Ramesh Mishra > > > > > > > > Sindhu Iyer <sindhu_iyer wrote: > > > > Hi all, > > > > The following is a data of one of my cousins. > She > > > is > > > > 32 years old now and still not married. I > don't > > > get > > > > an unmarrital state. The fk and Nk are not > that > > > > spoilt > > > > either. > > > > > > > > Here are the details: > > > > 22 Nov 1974 > > > > 13:40 PM > > > > 13N5 and 80E13. > > > > > > > > I tried changing from Aquarius lagna to Pisces > but > > > > that did not help. All her delays get over > 2002, > > > > both > > > > Sa and Ju. > > > > > > > > I don't understand why Sa being LOD and with > 31 > > > > points > > > > for H7 could not give marriage. I am sure I am > > > > missing > > > > something. If someone could point out that > would > > > be > > > > great! > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > Sindhu > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Tired of spam? Mail has the best spam > > > > protection around > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Check out what you're missing if you're not > on > > > > Messenger > > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been > > > > removed] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Tired of spam? Mail has the best spam > > > protection around > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Tired of spam? Mail has the best spam > protection around > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 19, 2007 Report Share Posted April 19, 2007 Dear Sindhu and all members, I always go as per the lessons.If you read lessons, you may find that any event takes place during the sub of planet who has highest points or strength or LoD or LoE for house B. In this chart Me does not have highest strength for 7 th and he is not LoE or LoD.Neither he is SD to any of these planets. So I eliminated Me antara for house 7th matter. Me is also weak in 5th. Actually according to the points incurred by the relationship among asc,Su and Mo and their 7th lord it comes only 5 points.So the event will be very late and that too in the sub of planet who has minimum point in WS for 7th. Ke is SD to Ve and Mo and occupy house D. Ke is more like Mo who has the lowest point for 7th in WS. Mo is also weak in 2nd,5th and 12th house in WS. On the other hand Ve is strong in all houses. So I selected Ke antara. May Ash point me out if I am incorrect. Thanks and regards. Ramesh Mishra Sindhu Iyer <sindhu_iyer wrote: Dear Ash, Thank you once again. I see the mistake I did, I kept the lagna to be Sagitarius and moved the clock so that the navamsa lagna changed and SA was not in the 5th hosue of Navamsa. Next time I will pay better attention to the instructions! Thank you again, Sindhu --- ashsam73 <ashsam73 wrote: > Dear Sindhu, > > The marriage of previous quiz was in Dec 12th 1999. > Marriage was at > 24.24 years of age. > > Is that possible with Sa in 5th in navamsa? > > After rectification of the chart and a discussion > the event is better > explained by Sco lagna. > > Ramesh had also reached the similar conclusion. > > Cheers !!! > Ash -> http://www.ashtro.ca > > , > Sindhu Iyer > <sindhu_iyer wrote: > > > > > > --- Sindhu Iyer <sindhu_iyer wrote: > > > > > Dear Ramesh,Anup,Ash and others, > > > Can you please explain to me why you think > Mercury > > > antara cannot give the result. Mercury has > enough > > > points for 7th and not aspecting A,B or C. Why > not > > > mercury? I still last sector of Mercury can do > the > > > job > > > unless I am not seeing something seemingly > obvious > > > > > > Waiting for results on the previous quiz from > Ash > > > too! > > > > > > > > > --Thanks in advance > > > Sindhu > > > > > > > > > --- ramesh mishra <aarceemastro2002 > > > wrote: > > > > > > > Dear Sindu, > > > > I observed the following > combinations.Probably > > > > these may be the reason for delaying. But I am > not > > > > sure. > > > > You are correct that delay caused by Sa and > Ju > > > > both ends on 31 May 2000 (when lagna is Aq) > during > > > > Ju- Ra. > > > > Sa antara in Sa main should have given > marriage. > > > > The fact is, it did not do so. > > > > 1. No blessings in the chart.Lagna lord and > 9th > > > > lord is in 6/8 both in rasi and navamsa. > > > > 2. Full delay by Sa and Ju both. > > > > 3.No moderation of delay. > > > > 4.Su to Ve distance is only 3 deg 55 min. so > Ve > > > is > > > > weak and combust. Ve is very close to Su. This > > > might > > > > be one of the reason. Remember Ve is NK for > 7th. > > > > Ju the FK is in 12th from its karaksthaan > and > > > > makes relationship with 6th lord Mo.Though Mo > is > > > not > > > > considered as effect of 6th however it effects > the > > > > relationship of marriage. > > > > Mo also has made relationship with LoA, LoC > and > > > > house B.Mo is also in the 4th place from LoB > Su. > > > Mo > > > > is strong with 5 bindus in lagna and aspects > house > > > > B. > > > > This might be another reason. > > > > 5.From Asc and Mo the relation between lagna > and > > > > its 7th is 6:8. > > > > and from that of Su is 2/12. This might be > third > > > > reason for enhancing the delay.The native gets > > > only > > > > 5 points out of 100 point. > > > > Therefore taking all abovementioned factors > into > > > > account it has come to the conclusion that > delay > > > is > > > > further enhanced. > > > > Now the native is running through Me antara > in > > > Sa > > > > main. > > > > Next antara of Ke may be fruitful for her > and > > > she > > > > may be married during third sector of Ke > antara. > > > > Probable period might be Jan/2009 and > May/2009. > > > > May GOD bless her in first sector. > > > > Thanks and regards. > > > > Ramesh Mishra > > > > > > > > Sindhu Iyer <sindhu_iyer wrote: > > > > Hi all, > > > > The following is a data of one of my cousins. > She > > > is > > > > 32 years old now and still not married. I > don't > > > get > > > > an unmarrital state. The fk and Nk are not > that > > > > spoilt > > > > either. > > > > > > > > Here are the details: > > > > 22 Nov 1974 > > > > 13:40 PM > > > > 13N5 and 80E13. > > > > > > > > I tried changing from Aquarius lagna to Pisces > but > > > > that did not help. All her delays get over > 2002, > > > > both > > > > Sa and Ju. > > > > > > > > I don't understand why Sa being LOD and with > 31 > > > > points > > > > for H7 could not give marriage. I am sure I am > > > > missing > > > > something. If someone could point out that > would > > > be > > > > great! > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > Sindhu > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Tired of spam? Mail has the best spam > > > > protection around > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Check out what you're missing if you're not > on > > > > Messenger > > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been > > > > removed] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Tired of spam? Mail has the best spam > > > protection around > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Tired of spam? Mail has the best spam > protection around > > > > > > > Check out what you're missing if you're not on Messenger Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.