Re:Another marriage chart .. Ash/others can you help

[Guest guest]

Hi Ash,

I was wondering if you could help us with this

chart. Is Ramesh's reasoning correct as to why Sa

antara did not give marriage? Quality and Quantity are

different and yet we both seem to be stuck in

identifying the right time.

 

 

Thanks,

Sindhu

 

 

--- ramesh mishra <aarceemastro2002

wrote:

 

> Dear Sindhu,

> I observed the following combinations.Probably

> these may be the reason for delaying. But I am not

> sure.

> You are correct that delay caused by Sa and Ju

> both ends on 31 May 2000 (when lagna is Aq) during

> Ju- Ra.

> Sa antara in Sa main should have given marriage.

> The fact is, it did not do so.

> 1. No blessings in the chart.Lagna lord and 9th

> lord is in 6/8 both in rasi and navamsa.

> 2. Full delay by Sa and Ju both.

> 3.No moderation of delay.

> 4.Su to Ve distance is only 3 deg 55 min. so Ve is

> weak and combust. Ve is very close to Su. This might

> be one of the reason. Remember Ve is NK for 7th.

> Ju the FK is in 12th from its karaksthaan and

> makes relationship with 6th lord Mo.Though Mo is not

> considered as effect of 6th however it effects the

> relationship of marriage.

> Mo also has made relationship with LoA, LoC and

> house B.Mo is also in the 4th place from LoB Su. Mo

> is strong with 5 bindus in lagna and aspects house

> B.

> This might be another reason.

> 5.From Asc and Mo the relation between lagna and

> its 7th is 6:8.

> and from that of Su is 2/12. This might be third

> reason for enhancing the delay.The native gets only

> 5 points out of 100 point.

> Therefore taking all abovementioned factors into

> account it has come to the conclusion that delay is

> further enhanced.

> Now the native is running through Me antara in Sa

> main.

> Next antara of Ke may be fruitful for her and she

> may be married during third sector of Ke antara.

> Probable period might be Jan/2009 and May/2009.

> May GOD bless her in first sector.

> Thanks and regards.

> Ramesh Mishra

>

>

> Sindhu Iyer <sindhu_iyer wrote:

> Hi all,

> The following is a data of one of my cousins. She is

> 32 years old now and still not married. I don't get

> an unmarrital state. The fk and Nk are not that

> spoilt

> either.

>

> Here are the details:

> 22 Nov 1974

> 13:40 PM

> 13N5 and 80E13.

>

> I tried changing from Aquarius lagna to Pisces but

> that did not help. All her delays get over 2002,

> both

> Sa and Ju.

>

> I don't understand why Sa being LOD and with 31

> points

> for H7 could not give marriage. I am sure I am

> missing

> something. If someone could point out that would be

> great!

>

> Thanks,

> Sindhu

>

>

>

> Tired of spam? Mail has the best spam

> protection around

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

> Check out what you're missing if you're not on

> Messenger

>

> [Non-text portions of this message have been

> removed]

>

>