Re:Another marriage chart .. Ash interesting revelations

[Guest guest]

Dear Ash,

You hit the nail on the head! Bingo!

 

You are right, in Sat antara she had an affair with

somebody at work and that broke in Sat Antara around

2004. My cousin was too embarassed to give me any more

details.How did you figure out the affair at work

part? I see Sa as 12th lord in 5th and aspecting 7th,

is that why you thought about the affair?

 

Now, coming back to the timing part, she is now

running Mercury antara, again mercury is strong for

7th and 12th but weak for 5th. Next is Ketu

representing moon and venus. If it behaves like Venus

then ketu can furnish the timing, but like moon, I am

doubtful? Next is Venus and it surely can give the

result.

 

What do you suggest?

 

As I always say, I look forward to your explaination!

 

Sindhu

 

 

 

 

 

--- Sindhu Iyer <sindhu_iyer wrote:

 

> Hi Ash,

> Once again, thank you for the feed back. As far as

> I

> know she did not have an affair, I can ask her.

>

> She is a project coordinator in a company in India,

> and honestly, I don't know how to see that in a

> chart.

>

> Lagna is at the border 29 Aq, when I change that to

> Pisces lagna, I get no delays and she should have

> married long time ago. With Aq lagna, I seem to get

> delays.

>

>

> Thanks,

> Sindhu

>

>

> --- ashsam73 <ashsam73 wrote:

>

> > Dear Sindhu,

> >

> > Sa is powerful for 7th house and 12th house but

> its

> > weak for 5th

> > house. Can you tell me if your cousin had a

> strong

> > relationship that

> > broke in Sa antra.

> >

> > See, Sa is powerful for 7th house, its in House E

> > for 12th, also Sa is

> > SD to Ve who is LoE for 12th.

> >

> > Now, from this data marriage should have happened

> in

> > Sa antra but it

> > hasnt.

> >

> > Try to see if the career is matching and check for

> > other events as well.

> >

> > I have a feeling that if this birth time is right,

> > she might have had

> > a strong relation which might have broken when sun

> > transited sign /

> > nak of moon.

> >

> > She might have met this person in her office or

> > place where she works.

> > She must be a very devoted person to her work.

> >

> > Please confirm.

> >

> > Cheers !!!

> > Ash -> http://www.ashtro.ca

> >

> > ,

> > Sindhu Iyer

> > <sindhu_iyer wrote:

> > >

> > > Hi Ash,

> > > I was wondering if you could help us with this

> > > chart. Is Ramesh's reasoning correct as to why

> Sa

> > > antara did not give marriage? Quality and

> Quantity

> > are

> > > different and yet we both seem to be stuck in

> > > identifying the right time.

> > >

> > >

> > > Thanks,

> > > Sindhu

> > >

> > >

> > > --- ramesh mishra <aarceemastro2002

> > > wrote:

> > >

> > > > Dear Sindhu,

> > > > I observed the following

> combinations.Probably

> > > > these may be the reason for delaying. But I am

> > not

> > > > sure.

> > > > You are correct that delay caused by Sa and

> Ju

> > > > both ends on 31 May 2000 (when lagna is Aq)

> > during

> > > > Ju- Ra.

> > > > Sa antara in Sa main should have given

> > marriage.

> > > > The fact is, it did not do so.

> > > > 1. No blessings in the chart.Lagna lord and

> > 9th

> > > > lord is in 6/8 both in rasi and navamsa.

> > > > 2. Full delay by Sa and Ju both.

> > > > 3.No moderation of delay.

> > > > 4.Su to Ve distance is only 3 deg 55 min. so

> > Ve is

> > > > weak and combust. Ve is very close to Su. This

> > might

> > > > be one of the reason. Remember Ve is NK for

> 7th.

> > > > Ju the FK is in 12th from its karaksthaan

> and

> > > > makes relationship with 6th lord Mo.Though Mo

> is

> > not

> > > > considered as effect of 6th however it effects

> > the

> > > > relationship of marriage.

> > > > Mo also has made relationship with LoA, LoC

> > and

> > > > house B.Mo is also in the 4th place from LoB

> Su.

> > Mo

> > > > is strong with 5 bindus in lagna and aspects

> > house

> > > > B.

> > > > This might be another reason.

> > > > 5.From Asc and Mo the relation between lagna

> > and

> > > > its 7th is 6:8.

> > > > and from that of Su is 2/12. This might be

> > third

> > > > reason for enhancing the delay.The native gets

> > only

> > > > 5 points out of 100 point.

> > > > Therefore taking all abovementioned factors

> > into

> > > > account it has come to the conclusion that

> delay

> > is

> > > > further enhanced.

> > > > Now the native is running through Me antara

> in

> > Sa

> > > > main.

> > > > Next antara of Ke may be fruitful for her

> and

> > she

> > > > may be married during third sector of Ke

> > antara.

> > > > Probable period might be Jan/2009 and

> May/2009.

> > > > May GOD bless her in first sector.

> > > > Thanks and regards.

> > > > Ramesh Mishra

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > Sindhu Iyer <sindhu_iyer wrote:

> > > > Hi all,

> > > > The following is a data of one of my cousins.

> > She is

> > > > 32 years old now and still not married. I

> don't

> > get

> > > > an unmarrital state. The fk and Nk are not

> that

> > > > spoilt

> > > > either.

> > > >

> > > > Here are the details:

> > > > 22 Nov 1974

> > > > 13:40 PM

> > > > 13N5 and 80E13.

> > > >

> > > > I tried changing from Aquarius lagna to Pisces

> > but

> > > > that did not help. All her delays get over

> 2002,

> > > > both

> > > > Sa and Ju.

> > > >

> > > > I don't understand why Sa being LOD and with

> 31

> > > > points

> > > > for H7 could not give marriage. I am sure I am

> > > > missing

> > > > something. If someone could point out that

> would

> > be

> > > > great!

> > > >

> > > > Thanks,

> > > > Sindhu

> > > >

> > > >

> >

> > > >

> > > > Tired of spam? Mail has the best spam

> > > > protection around

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

>

=== message truncated ===