Previously solved chart by ash ... some questions

[Guest guest]

Dear Ash,

Here is a link for a quiz that you gave and solved

in the archives...

 

/message/7576

 

When I solved this chart, I avoided the 6th lord Venus

Antra because there weren't any jarring reasons for

unhappy marriage ( no venus is bad nakshatras, sun to

venus distance within limits). I picked the antra

after that.

 

However, you in your analysis picked Venus antra, 6th

lord. If I am not asking for too much, may I ask why?

 

However, since lagna was at the border, I shifted the

clock by 10 minutes and was able to time marriage in

the right frame Venus Antra ( because it then became

LOE).

 

Here are the ascendant degrees and chart data if that

makes life easier:

Planet Degrees

As 28 Ta 57

Su 3 Sc 34

Mo 13 Pi 59

Ma 10 Sc 56

Me 18 Li 20

Ju 9 Cp 37

Ve 16 Li 47

Sa 2 Cp 57

Ra 29 Cn 53

Ke 29 Cp 53

 

Nov 18,1961

Time: 7:30PM Zone: 5:30 DST: 0

Bangalore,India

Longitude: 77E35 Latitude: 12N59

 

As always, thank you so much for your time and

appreciate your help!

 

Thanks,

Sindhu

 

 

 

 

--- ashsam73 <ashsam73 wrote:

 

> Dear Group,

> I think everyone should try to answer the question

> that Krushnaji had

> asked in Message 319.

> We can have a discussion on the same as well.

> Cheers !!!

> Ash -> http://www.ashtro.ca

>

> ,

> " ashsam73 "

> <ashsam73 wrote:

> >

> > Dear Satish,

> >

> > Krushanji had asked this question when the group

> started and he also

> > said that if a person finds the answer to those

> question will have

> > understood the core of Ashtakavarg and Vedic

> Astrology.

> > Here are some interesting mails from the archives.

> >

> > You can read all the discussion w.r.t that thread,

> its really very

> > interesting.

> >

> > The Question is asked by Krushnaji in message 319.

> >

> >

>

/message/319

> >

>

/message/331

> >

>

/message/342

> >

> >

> > Cheers !!!

> > Ash -> http://www.ashtro.ca

> >

> > ,

> SPK

> > <aquaris_rising@> wrote:

> > >

> > > Dear Ash,

> > >

> > > How does malefics in 3 6 11 are good, jive with

> that

> > > they are upachaya houses. How to resolve this

> > > discrepancy ?

> > >

> > > Satish

> > > --- SPK <aquaris_rising@> wrote:

> > >

> > > > Dear Ash,

> > > >

> > > > Do not know whether there are exceptions or

> where

> > > > the

> > > > shloka comes from. Levae aside 6th house for

> the

> > > > moment. Lets examine 8th and 12th from a

> house. Now

> > > > 8th from a house is its karakatwta from KAS so

> a

> > > > malefic there( natural) will destroy the

> karakatwa

> > > > or

> > > > house A. Now whether it happens only for

> natural

> > > > malefics or binduwise malefics, one may have

> to look

> > > > at many charts. 12 th from a bhava has malefic

> it

> > > > affects the bhava, is it true always or is

> this used

> > > > if the lord of bhava is in 12th from it..not

> sure.

> > > >

> > > > Now coming to the 6th house, yes, 6th house

> from a

> > > > house is upachaya and malefic there should

> harm the

> > > > growth of that house. Now the gist is are they

> > > > talking

> > > > about natural malefics or binduwise malefics

> ..we

> > > > must

> > > > explore

> > > >

> > > > Satish

> > > > --- ashsam73 <ashsam73@> wrote:

> > > >

> > > > > Dear Satish,

> > > >

> > >

> > >

>

> > >

> > > Tired of spam? Mail has the best spam

> protection around

> > >

> > >

> >

>

>

>