Guest guest Posted May 30, 2007 Report Share Posted May 30, 2007 dear, keep sleeping, i don't mind u sleep... but what did u justify? i gave data to satis & soon after that he took up the case.... & after that all my mails got posted.... wahaa jahan , " ashsam73 " <ashsam73 wrote: > > Dear Wahaa, > > That is because I try to get some sleep at night :-). > > Have u read the list attributes? if not just take a few moments to > read that as well. Its clearly written that all mails from new > members are moderated. > > Just so that u are upto date and understand something about that list > which is that this is a specific KAS list and here we discuss KAS. > This is not a general discussion list. > > This list is not MY list, its the list created by the efforts of our > teacher Krushnaji to teach us KAS and for discussion of KAS. > > You are free to discuss KAS should you so like, but causing > disturbance by unnecessary provocation or name calling to members will > not be tolerated and you shall be banned. > > I hope its clear now. > Cheers !!! > Ash -> http://www.ashtro.ca > Moderator > > > , " wahaa_2005 " > <wahaa_2005@> wrote: > > > > dear mr. Ash, > > when i saw blocking of my mails on your site for so long time, > > i already sent message on satis's messenger that her marriage > > was solemnised in feb,1999.she delivered her baby on 10 Dec.2000 in > > VSS medical college,burla,sambalpur,Orissa! > > > > for analysis,i gave birth of the baby as hint to catch the thread on > > analysis.... > > now what is left to decide on my sister-in-law's marriage date of > > marriage? > > i have already revealed her date of marriage to satis. > > thanks ! > > wahaa jahan > > > > just some time after that i saw all my mails got posted on this site! > > > > , " ashsam73 " > > <ashsam73@> wrote: > > > > > > Dear Anup and Ramesh, > > > > > > Perfect. Even this chart, if you see, I had not even attempted as > > not > > > enough data was there. > > > > > > I was just giving guidance to clarify our laws. > > > > > > To get perfect reading, one must have so many events to verify. > > Have > > > you ever seen Krushnaji just take any chart and attempt it, just go > > > through the archives. In fact in one chart he took it and gave it > > to > > > the list because after the native gave the events, NONE of the > > events > > > tallied and Krushanji gave that as an exercise to the list for > > people > > > to try it. The difference in birth time was I believe 45 minutes > > or > > > so if memory serves me right and with that he also made a > > prediction > > > that if this birth time was right then this person would have a > > child, > > > and that came true and the native himself came back to the list and > > > acknowledged it which was nice of him. > > > > > > Take charts with known data to practice and build your confidence > > > first and one more thing, the charts that you all are giving are > > not > > > easy ones as I think easy charts people solve and get answers so > > they > > > do not write that on list. Its when the charts are not matching > > that > > > too by senior members they are putting forward on list, so those > > are > > > the 20% of the 80-20 rule also keep that in mind. > > > > > > Otherwise, if u just apply the basic laws, that good events happen > > in > > > LoD or LoE or highest points u can see a huge % of charts matching > > the > > > criteria. > > > > > > Cheers !!! > > > Ash -> http://www.ashtro.ca > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > , " Anup. M " > > > <dalh_1@> wrote: > > > > > > > > Dear Ramesh, > > > > Thanxs for reviewing this again. > > > > Lets learn more and more with given lessons. > > > > > > > > Regards > > > > Anup > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ramesh mishra <aarceemastro2002@> wrote: > > > > Dear Anup, > > > > I checked up your analysis of this chart. Your analysis is > > perfect > > > but the event does not tally according to data given. > > > > There is no other event also to verify the authenticity of birth > > time. > > > > So it is simply wasting our time to proceed further with this > > chart. > > > > Time rectification also is fruitless due to unavailability of > > past > > > events. > > > > I hope u understand this. > > > > Thanks and regards. > > > > Ramesh Mishra > > > > > > > > " Anup. M " <dalh_1@> wrote: > > > > Dear Ash, ramesh and all, > > > > > > > > This chart was given by native's relative and feed back was also > > > given accordingly.We can judge the authenticity itself from the > > chart. > > > > Better we sld go ahead leaving this and learn more things over > > here > > > without losing time. > > > > > > > > Regards > > > > Anup > > > > > > > > ashsam73 <ashsam73@> wrote: > > > > Dear Ramesh, > > > > > > > > I think its better to leave this chart. The tone is not nice and > > > > neither there is any respect and it is like a chart is given for > > > > testing KAS. > > > > > > > > I saw this person posted things on another list as well w.r.t > > all this > > > > and is calling names to list members. > > > > > > > > So its better, that we can say that this is an exceptional chart > > from > > > > KAS system and no laws are matching and better to leave it > > following > > > > our code of conduct which says that if events are not matching > > then > > > > its better to accept our limitations as human beings. > > > > > > > > There are so many other charts we all can work on. > > > > > > > > I hope you will understand where I am coming from. > > > > > > > > Atleast that is my humble suggestion. > > > > Cheers !!! > > > > Ash -> http://www.ashtro.ca > > > > > > > > , ramesh mishra > > > > <aarceemastro2002@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Dear ??, > > > > > If she is married then what is the date of marriage ? > > > > > Will you mind to disclose it ? > > > > > Thanks > > > > > Ramesh Mishra > > > > > > > > > > wahaa_2005 <wahaa_2005@> wrote: > > > > > --------[[THE LADY ON THE CASE STUDY IS ALREADY > > > > MARRIED,LEADING A VERY > > > > > HAPPY MARRIED LIFE,MOTHER OF ALREADY 7 YEAR OLD > > DAUGHTER....SHE HAS > > > > > EDUCATION OF M.Phil MATHEMATICS,SIMPLY A HOME MAKER.....HAVING > > VERY > > > > > CARING HUSBAND & LIBERAL INLAWS-FAMILY.....ENJOYING ALL WORLDLY > > > > > COMFORTS ALTOGATHER]]------------ > > > > > > > > > > , Anup > > <dalh_1@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > hI all, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Another chart here.... > > > > > > > > > > > > DOB 3rd JULY 1976 > > > > > > tob 04.23am > > > > > > lat 20N10 lati 85E42 IST > > > > > > > > > > > > Asc 6 G 38 > > > > > > > > > > > > In which antra the native may marry? > > > > > > > > > > > > Full delay by Sat and by Jup.. > > > > > > Two zero in 7th hosue by MARS and Mer > > > > > > DBCE in lagna and Sun in ascending order > > > > > > 6th lord with FK(moon) in Sun navamsa and in lagna in rashi > > chart > > > > > > Lagna and 7th lord in 6:8 ratio > > > > > > Venus( Nk)in Mars(6th lord) navamsa > > > > > > Moon with 6th lord in rashi > > > > > > Sat delay ends in arround 15-07-2002 in rahu antra > > > > > > Jup delay added one year plus 20% delay added due to 2 zero > > > > > > Jup wont give the marriage being in house C > > > > > > > > > > > > Can Sat antra will give the marriage in 3rd sector? > > > > > > I think it wont as Sat is in house A.. > > > > > > > > > > > > Will Mer in first sector give the marriage in june 2009- apr- > > 2010? > > > > > > > > > > > > Mer is SD to Venus,Sun,Moon > > > > > > Mer is LOd in 7th hosue > > > > > > Venus , being SD to Mercury, LOE in 12th > > > > > > Moon is LOD in 5th.. > > > > > > > > > > > > Mer is aspecting House B,but Mer is LoE > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Regards > > > > > > Anup > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Ahhh...imagining that irresistible " new car " smell? > > > > > > Check outnew cars at Autos. > > > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 30, 2007 Report Share Posted May 30, 2007 Dear Ash, i knew that....that day itself ...so i posted comments on JR group... keep sleeping...i have no objection! but what did u justify? wahaa jahan , " ashsam73 " <ashsam73 wrote: > > Dear Wahaa, > > That is because I try to get some sleep at night :-). > > Have u read the list attributes? if not just take a few moments to > read that as well. Its clearly written that all mails from new > members are moderated. > > Just so that u are upto date and understand something about that list > which is that this is a specific KAS list and here we discuss KAS. > This is not a general discussion list. > > This list is not MY list, its the list created by the efforts of our > teacher Krushnaji to teach us KAS and for discussion of KAS. > > You are free to discuss KAS should you so like, but causing > disturbance by unnecessary provocation or name calling to members will > not be tolerated and you shall be banned. > > I hope its clear now. > Cheers !!! > Ash -> http://www.ashtro.ca > Moderator > > > , " wahaa_2005 " > <wahaa_2005@> wrote: > > > > dear mr. Ash, > > when i saw blocking of my mails on your site for so long time, > > i already sent message on satis's messenger that her marriage > > was solemnised in feb,1999.she delivered her baby on 10 Dec.2000 in > > VSS medical college,burla,sambalpur,Orissa! > > > > for analysis,i gave birth of the baby as hint to catch the thread on > > analysis.... > > now what is left to decide on my sister-in-law's marriage date of > > marriage? > > i have already revealed her date of marriage to satis. > > thanks ! > > wahaa jahan > > > > just some time after that i saw all my mails got posted on this site! > > > > , " ashsam73 " > > <ashsam73@> wrote: > > > > > > Dear Anup and Ramesh, > > > > > > Perfect. Even this chart, if you see, I had not even attempted as > > not > > > enough data was there. > > > > > > I was just giving guidance to clarify our laws. > > > > > > To get perfect reading, one must have so many events to verify. > > Have > > > you ever seen Krushnaji just take any chart and attempt it, just go > > > through the archives. In fact in one chart he took it and gave it > > to > > > the list because after the native gave the events, NONE of the > > events > > > tallied and Krushanji gave that as an exercise to the list for > > people > > > to try it. The difference in birth time was I believe 45 minutes > > or > > > so if memory serves me right and with that he also made a > > prediction > > > that if this birth time was right then this person would have a > > child, > > > and that came true and the native himself came back to the list and > > > acknowledged it which was nice of him. > > > > > > Take charts with known data to practice and build your confidence > > > first and one more thing, the charts that you all are giving are > > not > > > easy ones as I think easy charts people solve and get answers so > > they > > > do not write that on list. Its when the charts are not matching > > that > > > too by senior members they are putting forward on list, so those > > are > > > the 20% of the 80-20 rule also keep that in mind. > > > > > > Otherwise, if u just apply the basic laws, that good events happen > > in > > > LoD or LoE or highest points u can see a huge % of charts matching > > the > > > criteria. > > > > > > Cheers !!! > > > Ash -> http://www.ashtro.ca > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > , " Anup. M " > > > <dalh_1@> wrote: > > > > > > > > Dear Ramesh, > > > > Thanxs for reviewing this again. > > > > Lets learn more and more with given lessons. > > > > > > > > Regards > > > > Anup > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ramesh mishra <aarceemastro2002@> wrote: > > > > Dear Anup, > > > > I checked up your analysis of this chart. Your analysis is > > perfect > > > but the event does not tally according to data given. > > > > There is no other event also to verify the authenticity of birth > > time. > > > > So it is simply wasting our time to proceed further with this > > chart. > > > > Time rectification also is fruitless due to unavailability of > > past > > > events. > > > > I hope u understand this. > > > > Thanks and regards. > > > > Ramesh Mishra > > > > > > > > " Anup. M " <dalh_1@> wrote: > > > > Dear Ash, ramesh and all, > > > > > > > > This chart was given by native's relative and feed back was also > > > given accordingly.We can judge the authenticity itself from the > > chart. > > > > Better we sld go ahead leaving this and learn more things over > > here > > > without losing time. > > > > > > > > Regards > > > > Anup > > > > > > > > ashsam73 <ashsam73@> wrote: > > > > Dear Ramesh, > > > > > > > > I think its better to leave this chart. The tone is not nice and > > > > neither there is any respect and it is like a chart is given for > > > > testing KAS. > > > > > > > > I saw this person posted things on another list as well w.r.t > > all this > > > > and is calling names to list members. > > > > > > > > So its better, that we can say that this is an exceptional chart > > from > > > > KAS system and no laws are matching and better to leave it > > following > > > > our code of conduct which says that if events are not matching > > then > > > > its better to accept our limitations as human beings. > > > > > > > > There are so many other charts we all can work on. > > > > > > > > I hope you will understand where I am coming from. > > > > > > > > Atleast that is my humble suggestion. > > > > Cheers !!! > > > > Ash -> http://www.ashtro.ca > > > > > > > > , ramesh mishra > > > > <aarceemastro2002@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Dear ??, > > > > > If she is married then what is the date of marriage ? > > > > > Will you mind to disclose it ? > > > > > Thanks > > > > > Ramesh Mishra > > > > > > > > > > wahaa_2005 <wahaa_2005@> wrote: > > > > > --------[[THE LADY ON THE CASE STUDY IS ALREADY > > > > MARRIED,LEADING A VERY > > > > > HAPPY MARRIED LIFE,MOTHER OF ALREADY 7 YEAR OLD > > DAUGHTER....SHE HAS > > > > > EDUCATION OF M.Phil MATHEMATICS,SIMPLY A HOME MAKER.....HAVING > > VERY > > > > > CARING HUSBAND & LIBERAL INLAWS-FAMILY.....ENJOYING ALL WORLDLY > > > > > COMFORTS ALTOGATHER]]------------ > > > > > > > > > > , Anup > > <dalh_1@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > hI all, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Another chart here.... > > > > > > > > > > > > DOB 3rd JULY 1976 > > > > > > tob 04.23am > > > > > > lat 20N10 lati 85E42 IST > > > > > > > > > > > > Asc 6 G 38 > > > > > > > > > > > > In which antra the native may marry? > > > > > > > > > > > > Full delay by Sat and by Jup.. > > > > > > Two zero in 7th hosue by MARS and Mer > > > > > > DBCE in lagna and Sun in ascending order > > > > > > 6th lord with FK(moon) in Sun navamsa and in lagna in rashi > > chart > > > > > > Lagna and 7th lord in 6:8 ratio > > > > > > Venus( Nk)in Mars(6th lord) navamsa > > > > > > Moon with 6th lord in rashi > > > > > > Sat delay ends in arround 15-07-2002 in rahu antra > > > > > > Jup delay added one year plus 20% delay added due to 2 zero > > > > > > Jup wont give the marriage being in house C > > > > > > > > > > > > Can Sat antra will give the marriage in 3rd sector? > > > > > > I think it wont as Sat is in house A.. > > > > > > > > > > > > Will Mer in first sector give the marriage in june 2009- apr- > > 2010? > > > > > > > > > > > > Mer is SD to Venus,Sun,Moon > > > > > > Mer is LOd in 7th hosue > > > > > > Venus , being SD to Mercury, LOE in 12th > > > > > > Moon is LOD in 5th.. > > > > > > > > > > > > Mer is aspecting House B,but Mer is LoE > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Regards > > > > > > Anup > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Ahhh...imagining that irresistible " new car " smell? > > > > > > Check outnew cars at Autos. > > > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 30, 2007 Report Share Posted May 30, 2007 dear Ash, plz show me what did u justify? i did not say i won't come to give u fact... i have already given marriage date... yes,i mixed lots of spices love/affair etc etc & somewhere other mixed some real fact when i gave this chart to mr. Anup. i don't understand anything of KAS. so please tell me what did u justify? i am only interested to know that. why should i mind,if u make all your means to sleep sometime in night? Only kindly tell me what did u justify? i am only keen to know KAS prediction reliability! plz show it to me! regards, wahaa jahan , " wahaa_2005 " <wahaa_2005 wrote: > > Dear Ash, > i knew that....that day itself ...so i posted comments on JR group... > keep sleeping...i have no objection! > but what did u justify? > wahaa jahan > , " ashsam73 " > <ashsam73@> wrote: > > > > Dear Wahaa, > > > > That is because I try to get some sleep at night :-). > > > > Have u read the list attributes? if not just take a few moments to > > read that as well. Its clearly written that all mails from new > > members are moderated. > > > > Just so that u are upto date and understand something about that > list > > which is that this is a specific KAS list and here we discuss > KAS. > > This is not a general discussion list. > > > > This list is not MY list, its the list created by the efforts of > our > > teacher Krushnaji to teach us KAS and for discussion of KAS. > > > > You are free to discuss KAS should you so like, but causing > > disturbance by unnecessary provocation or name calling to members > will > > not be tolerated and you shall be banned. > > > > I hope its clear now. > > Cheers !!! > > Ash -> http://www.ashtro.ca > > Moderator > > > > > > , " wahaa_2005 " > > <wahaa_2005@> wrote: > > > > > > dear mr. Ash, > > > when i saw blocking of my mails on your site for so long time, > > > i already sent message on satis's messenger that her > marriage > > > was solemnised in feb,1999.she delivered her baby on 10 Dec.2000 > in > > > VSS medical college,burla,sambalpur,Orissa! > > > > > > for analysis,i gave birth of the baby as hint to catch the > thread on > > > analysis.... > > > now what is left to decide on my sister-in-law's marriage date > of > > > marriage? > > > i have already revealed her date of marriage to satis. > > > thanks ! > > > wahaa jahan > > > > > > just some time after that i saw all my mails got posted on this > site! > > > > > > , " ashsam73 " > > > <ashsam73@> wrote: > > > > > > > > Dear Anup and Ramesh, > > > > > > > > Perfect. Even this chart, if you see, I had not even > attempted as > > > not > > > > enough data was there. > > > > > > > > I was just giving guidance to clarify our laws. > > > > > > > > To get perfect reading, one must have so many events to > verify. > > > Have > > > > you ever seen Krushnaji just take any chart and attempt it, > just go > > > > through the archives. In fact in one chart he took it and > gave it > > > to > > > > the list because after the native gave the events, NONE of the > > > events > > > > tallied and Krushanji gave that as an exercise to the list for > > > people > > > > to try it. The difference in birth time was I believe 45 > minutes > > > or > > > > so if memory serves me right and with that he also made a > > > prediction > > > > that if this birth time was right then this person would have > a > > > child, > > > > and that came true and the native himself came back to the > list and > > > > acknowledged it which was nice of him. > > > > > > > > Take charts with known data to practice and build your > confidence > > > > first and one more thing, the charts that you all are giving > are > > > not > > > > easy ones as I think easy charts people solve and get answers > so > > > they > > > > do not write that on list. Its when the charts are not > matching > > > that > > > > too by senior members they are putting forward on list, so > those > > > are > > > > the 20% of the 80-20 rule also keep that in mind. > > > > > > > > Otherwise, if u just apply the basic laws, that good events > happen > > > in > > > > LoD or LoE or highest points u can see a huge % of charts > matching > > > the > > > > criteria. > > > > > > > > Cheers !!! > > > > Ash -> http://www.ashtro.ca > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > , " Anup. M " > > > > <dalh_1@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Dear Ramesh, > > > > > Thanxs for reviewing this again. > > > > > Lets learn more and more with given lessons. > > > > > > > > > > Regards > > > > > Anup > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ramesh mishra <aarceemastro2002@> wrote: > > > > > Dear Anup, > > > > > I checked up your analysis of this chart. Your analysis is > > > perfect > > > > but the event does not tally according to data given. > > > > > There is no other event also to verify the authenticity of > birth > > > time. > > > > > So it is simply wasting our time to proceed further with > this > > > chart. > > > > > Time rectification also is fruitless due to unavailability > of > > > past > > > > events. > > > > > I hope u understand this. > > > > > Thanks and regards. > > > > > Ramesh Mishra > > > > > > > > > > " Anup. M " <dalh_1@> wrote: > > > > > Dear Ash, ramesh and all, > > > > > > > > > > This chart was given by native's relative and feed back was > also > > > > given accordingly.We can judge the authenticity itself from > the > > > chart. > > > > > Better we sld go ahead leaving this and learn more things > over > > > here > > > > without losing time. > > > > > > > > > > Regards > > > > > Anup > > > > > > > > > > ashsam73 <ashsam73@> wrote: > > > > > Dear Ramesh, > > > > > > > > > > I think its better to leave this chart. The tone is not nice > and > > > > > neither there is any respect and it is like a chart is given > for > > > > > testing KAS. > > > > > > > > > > I saw this person posted things on another list as well > w.r.t > > > all this > > > > > and is calling names to list members. > > > > > > > > > > So its better, that we can say that this is an exceptional > chart > > > from > > > > > KAS system and no laws are matching and better to leave it > > > following > > > > > our code of conduct which says that if events are not > matching > > > then > > > > > its better to accept our limitations as human beings. > > > > > > > > > > There are so many other charts we all can work on. > > > > > > > > > > I hope you will understand where I am coming from. > > > > > > > > > > Atleast that is my humble suggestion. > > > > > Cheers !!! > > > > > Ash -> http://www.ashtro.ca > > > > > > > > > > , ramesh > mishra > > > > > <aarceemastro2002@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear ??, > > > > > > If she is married then what is the date of marriage ? > > > > > > Will you mind to disclose it ? > > > > > > Thanks > > > > > > Ramesh Mishra > > > > > > > > > > > > wahaa_2005 <wahaa_2005@> wrote: > > > > > > --------[[THE LADY ON THE CASE STUDY IS ALREADY > > > > > MARRIED,LEADING A VERY > > > > > > HAPPY MARRIED LIFE,MOTHER OF ALREADY 7 YEAR OLD > > > DAUGHTER....SHE HAS > > > > > > EDUCATION OF M.Phil MATHEMATICS,SIMPLY A HOME > MAKER.....HAVING > > > VERY > > > > > > CARING HUSBAND & LIBERAL INLAWS-FAMILY.....ENJOYING ALL > WORLDLY > > > > > > COMFORTS ALTOGATHER]]------------ > > > > > > > > > > > > , Anup > > > <dalh_1@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > hI all, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Another chart here.... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > DOB 3rd JULY 1976 > > > > > > > tob 04.23am > > > > > > > lat 20N10 lati 85E42 IST > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Asc 6 G 38 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > In which antra the native may marry? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Full delay by Sat and by Jup.. > > > > > > > Two zero in 7th hosue by MARS and Mer > > > > > > > DBCE in lagna and Sun in ascending order > > > > > > > 6th lord with FK(moon) in Sun navamsa and in lagna in > rashi > > > chart > > > > > > > Lagna and 7th lord in 6:8 ratio > > > > > > > Venus( Nk)in Mars(6th lord) navamsa > > > > > > > Moon with 6th lord in rashi > > > > > > > Sat delay ends in arround 15-07-2002 in rahu antra > > > > > > > Jup delay added one year plus 20% delay added due to 2 > zero > > > > > > > Jup wont give the marriage being in house C > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Can Sat antra will give the marriage in 3rd sector? > > > > > > > I think it wont as Sat is in house A.. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Will Mer in first sector give the marriage in june 2009- > apr- > > > 2010? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Mer is SD to Venus,Sun,Moon > > > > > > > Mer is LOd in 7th hosue > > > > > > > Venus , being SD to Mercury, LOE in 12th > > > > > > > Moon is LOD in 5th.. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Mer is aspecting House B,but Mer is LoE > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Regards > > > > > > > Anup > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Ahhh...imagining that irresistible " new car " smell? > > > > > > > Check outnew cars at Autos. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 30, 2007 Report Share Posted May 30, 2007 dear Ash, plz think awhile she is my own sister in law,i can never play around her facts!let me go through also details posted in the case study right in the beginning... & i would take out all real fact given then. plz wait for some time. regards, wahaa jahan , " wahaa_2005 " <wahaa_2005 wrote: > > dear Ash, > plz show me what did u justify? > i did not say i won't come to give u fact... > i have already given marriage date... > yes,i mixed lots of spices love/affair etc etc & somewhere other > mixed some real fact when i gave this chart to mr. Anup. > i don't understand anything of KAS. > so please tell me what did u justify? > i am only interested to know that. > why should i mind,if u make all your means to sleep sometime in > night? > Only kindly tell me what did u justify? > i am only keen to know KAS prediction reliability! > plz show it to me! > regards, > wahaa jahan > > > , " wahaa_2005 " > <wahaa_2005@> wrote: > > > > Dear Ash, > > i knew that....that day itself ...so i posted comments on JR > group... > > keep sleeping...i have no objection! > > but what did u justify? > > wahaa jahan > > , " ashsam73 " > > <ashsam73@> wrote: > > > > > > Dear Wahaa, > > > > > > That is because I try to get some sleep at night :-). > > > > > > Have u read the list attributes? if not just take a few moments > to > > > read that as well. Its clearly written that all mails from new > > > members are moderated. > > > > > > Just so that u are upto date and understand something about that > > list > > > which is that this is a specific KAS list and here we discuss > > KAS. > > > This is not a general discussion list. > > > > > > This list is not MY list, its the list created by the efforts of > > our > > > teacher Krushnaji to teach us KAS and for discussion of KAS. > > > > > > You are free to discuss KAS should you so like, but causing > > > disturbance by unnecessary provocation or name calling to > members > > will > > > not be tolerated and you shall be banned. > > > > > > I hope its clear now. > > > Cheers !!! > > > Ash -> http://www.ashtro.ca > > > Moderator > > > > > > > > > , " wahaa_2005 " > > > <wahaa_2005@> wrote: > > > > > > > > dear mr. Ash, > > > > when i saw blocking of my mails on your site for so long time, > > > > i already sent message on satis's messenger that her > > marriage > > > > was solemnised in feb,1999.she delivered her baby on 10 > Dec.2000 > > in > > > > VSS medical college,burla,sambalpur,Orissa! > > > > > > > > for analysis,i gave birth of the baby as hint to catch the > > thread on > > > > analysis.... > > > > now what is left to decide on my sister-in-law's marriage date > > of > > > > marriage? > > > > i have already revealed her date of marriage to satis. > > > > thanks ! > > > > wahaa jahan > > > > > > > > just some time after that i saw all my mails got posted on > this > > site! > > > > > > > > , " ashsam73 " > > > > <ashsam73@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Dear Anup and Ramesh, > > > > > > > > > > Perfect. Even this chart, if you see, I had not even > > attempted as > > > > not > > > > > enough data was there. > > > > > > > > > > I was just giving guidance to clarify our laws. > > > > > > > > > > To get perfect reading, one must have so many events to > > verify. > > > > Have > > > > > you ever seen Krushnaji just take any chart and attempt it, > > just go > > > > > through the archives. In fact in one chart he took it and > > gave it > > > > to > > > > > the list because after the native gave the events, NONE of > the > > > > events > > > > > tallied and Krushanji gave that as an exercise to the list > for > > > > people > > > > > to try it. The difference in birth time was I believe 45 > > minutes > > > > or > > > > > so if memory serves me right and with that he also made a > > > > prediction > > > > > that if this birth time was right then this person would > have > > a > > > > child, > > > > > and that came true and the native himself came back to the > > list and > > > > > acknowledged it which was nice of him. > > > > > > > > > > Take charts with known data to practice and build your > > confidence > > > > > first and one more thing, the charts that you all are giving > > are > > > > not > > > > > easy ones as I think easy charts people solve and get > answers > > so > > > > they > > > > > do not write that on list. Its when the charts are not > > matching > > > > that > > > > > too by senior members they are putting forward on list, so > > those > > > > are > > > > > the 20% of the 80-20 rule also keep that in mind. > > > > > > > > > > Otherwise, if u just apply the basic laws, that good events > > happen > > > > in > > > > > LoD or LoE or highest points u can see a huge % of charts > > matching > > > > the > > > > > criteria. > > > > > > > > > > Cheers !!! > > > > > Ash -> http://www.ashtro.ca > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > , " Anup. M " > > > > > <dalh_1@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Ramesh, > > > > > > Thanxs for reviewing this again. > > > > > > Lets learn more and more with given lessons. > > > > > > > > > > > > Regards > > > > > > Anup > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ramesh mishra <aarceemastro2002@> wrote: > > > > > > Dear Anup, > > > > > > I checked up your analysis of this chart. Your analysis is > > > > perfect > > > > > but the event does not tally according to data given. > > > > > > There is no other event also to verify the authenticity of > > birth > > > > time. > > > > > > So it is simply wasting our time to proceed further with > > this > > > > chart. > > > > > > Time rectification also is fruitless due to unavailability > > of > > > > past > > > > > events. > > > > > > I hope u understand this. > > > > > > Thanks and regards. > > > > > > Ramesh Mishra > > > > > > > > > > > > " Anup. M " <dalh_1@> wrote: > > > > > > Dear Ash, ramesh and all, > > > > > > > > > > > > This chart was given by native's relative and feed back > was > > also > > > > > given accordingly.We can judge the authenticity itself from > > the > > > > chart. > > > > > > Better we sld go ahead leaving this and learn more things > > over > > > > here > > > > > without losing time. > > > > > > > > > > > > Regards > > > > > > Anup > > > > > > > > > > > > ashsam73 <ashsam73@> wrote: > > > > > > Dear Ramesh, > > > > > > > > > > > > I think its better to leave this chart. The tone is not > nice > > and > > > > > > neither there is any respect and it is like a chart is > given > > for > > > > > > testing KAS. > > > > > > > > > > > > I saw this person posted things on another list as well > > w.r.t > > > > all this > > > > > > and is calling names to list members. > > > > > > > > > > > > So its better, that we can say that this is an exceptional > > chart > > > > from > > > > > > KAS system and no laws are matching and better to leave it > > > > following > > > > > > our code of conduct which says that if events are not > > matching > > > > then > > > > > > its better to accept our limitations as human beings. > > > > > > > > > > > > There are so many other charts we all can work on. > > > > > > > > > > > > I hope you will understand where I am coming from. > > > > > > > > > > > > Atleast that is my humble suggestion. > > > > > > Cheers !!! > > > > > > Ash -> http://www.ashtro.ca > > > > > > > > > > > > , ramesh > > mishra > > > > > > <aarceemastro2002@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear ??, > > > > > > > If she is married then what is the date of marriage ? > > > > > > > Will you mind to disclose it ? > > > > > > > Thanks > > > > > > > Ramesh Mishra > > > > > > > > > > > > > > wahaa_2005 <wahaa_2005@> wrote: > > > > > > > --------[[THE LADY ON THE CASE STUDY IS ALREADY > > > > > > MARRIED,LEADING A VERY > > > > > > > HAPPY MARRIED LIFE,MOTHER OF ALREADY 7 YEAR OLD > > > > DAUGHTER....SHE HAS > > > > > > > EDUCATION OF M.Phil MATHEMATICS,SIMPLY A HOME > > MAKER.....HAVING > > > > VERY > > > > > > > CARING HUSBAND & LIBERAL INLAWS-FAMILY.....ENJOYING ALL > > WORLDLY > > > > > > > COMFORTS ALTOGATHER]]------------ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > , Anup > > > > <dalh_1@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > hI all, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Another chart here.... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > DOB 3rd JULY 1976 > > > > > > > > tob 04.23am > > > > > > > > lat 20N10 lati 85E42 IST > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Asc 6 G 38 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > In which antra the native may marry? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Full delay by Sat and by Jup.. > > > > > > > > Two zero in 7th hosue by MARS and Mer > > > > > > > > DBCE in lagna and Sun in ascending order > > > > > > > > 6th lord with FK(moon) in Sun navamsa and in lagna in > > rashi > > > > chart > > > > > > > > Lagna and 7th lord in 6:8 ratio > > > > > > > > Venus( Nk)in Mars(6th lord) navamsa > > > > > > > > Moon with 6th lord in rashi > > > > > > > > Sat delay ends in arround 15-07-2002 in rahu antra > > > > > > > > Jup delay added one year plus 20% delay added due to 2 > > zero > > > > > > > > Jup wont give the marriage being in house C > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Can Sat antra will give the marriage in 3rd sector? > > > > > > > > I think it wont as Sat is in house A.. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Will Mer in first sector give the marriage in june > 2009- > > apr- > > > > 2010? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Mer is SD to Venus,Sun,Moon > > > > > > > > Mer is LOd in 7th hosue > > > > > > > > Venus , being SD to Mercury, LOE in 12th > > > > > > > > Moon is LOD in 5th.. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Mer is aspecting House B,but Mer is LoE > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Regards > > > > > > > > Anup > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Ahhh...imagining that irresistible " new car " smell? > > > > > > > > Check outnew cars at Autos. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 30, 2007 Report Share Posted May 30, 2007 Dear Wahaa, That will be better. Just go through the posts from the beginning and keep an open mind. Just carefully study the posts of Krushnaji and the lessons. There is also a free program that u can use to cast the chart as we are using Krushna's ayanamsa. Like I said earlier too, Just keep aside your own chart or chart of your loved ones away otherwise there is a bias towards it and this is for all and its human psychology. Just try to understand what I am saying. Your questions for learning KAS are more than welcome. Just also study Satish's reply, he is a very learned person with years of astrology knowledge who is perfectly using the knowledge of Vedic Astrology and timing of events using KAS which is also a part. Cheers !!! Ash -> http://www.ashtro.ca , " wahaa_2005 " <wahaa_2005 wrote: > > dear Ash, > plz think awhile she is my own sister in law,i can never play around > her facts!let me go through also details posted in the case study > right in the beginning... & i would take out all real fact given then. > plz wait for some time. > regards, > wahaa jahan > , " wahaa_2005 " > <wahaa_2005@> wrote: > > > > dear Ash, > > plz show me what did u justify? > > i did not say i won't come to give u fact... > > i have already given marriage date... > > yes,i mixed lots of spices love/affair etc etc & somewhere other > > mixed some real fact when i gave this chart to mr. Anup. > > i don't understand anything of KAS. > > so please tell me what did u justify? > > i am only interested to know that. > > why should i mind,if u make all your means to sleep sometime in > > night? > > Only kindly tell me what did u justify? > > i am only keen to know KAS prediction reliability! > > plz show it to me! > > regards, > > wahaa jahan > > > > > > , " wahaa_2005 " > > <wahaa_2005@> wrote: > > > > > > Dear Ash, > > > i knew that....that day itself ...so i posted comments on JR > > group... > > > keep sleeping...i have no objection! > > > but what did u justify? > > > wahaa jahan > > > , " ashsam73 " > > > <ashsam73@> wrote: > > > > > > > > Dear Wahaa, > > > > > > > > That is because I try to get some sleep at night :-). > > > > > > > > Have u read the list attributes? if not just take a few > moments > > to > > > > read that as well. Its clearly written that all mails from new > > > > members are moderated. > > > > > > > > Just so that u are upto date and understand something about > that > > > list > > > > which is that this is a specific KAS list and here we discuss > > > KAS. > > > > This is not a general discussion list. > > > > > > > > This list is not MY list, its the list created by the efforts > of > > > our > > > > teacher Krushnaji to teach us KAS and for discussion of KAS. > > > > > > > > You are free to discuss KAS should you so like, but causing > > > > disturbance by unnecessary provocation or name calling to > > members > > > will > > > > not be tolerated and you shall be banned. > > > > > > > > I hope its clear now. > > > > Cheers !!! > > > > Ash -> http://www.ashtro.ca > > > > Moderator > > > > > > > > > > > > , " wahaa_2005 " > > > > <wahaa_2005@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > dear mr. Ash, > > > > > when i saw blocking of my mails on your site for so long > time, > > > > > i already sent message on satis's messenger that her > > > marriage > > > > > was solemnised in feb,1999.she delivered her baby on 10 > > Dec.2000 > > > in > > > > > VSS medical college,burla,sambalpur,Orissa! > > > > > > > > > > for analysis,i gave birth of the baby as hint to catch the > > > thread on > > > > > analysis.... > > > > > now what is left to decide on my sister-in-law's marriage > date > > > of > > > > > marriage? > > > > > i have already revealed her date of marriage to satis. > > > > > thanks ! > > > > > wahaa jahan > > > > > > > > > > just some time after that i saw all my mails got posted on > > this > > > site! > > > > > > > > > > , " ashsam73 " > > > > > <ashsam73@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Anup and Ramesh, > > > > > > > > > > > > Perfect. Even this chart, if you see, I had not even > > > attempted as > > > > > not > > > > > > enough data was there. > > > > > > > > > > > > I was just giving guidance to clarify our laws. > > > > > > > > > > > > To get perfect reading, one must have so many events to > > > verify. > > > > > Have > > > > > > you ever seen Krushnaji just take any chart and attempt > it, > > > just go > > > > > > through the archives. In fact in one chart he took it and > > > gave it > > > > > to > > > > > > the list because after the native gave the events, NONE of > > the > > > > > events > > > > > > tallied and Krushanji gave that as an exercise to the list > > for > > > > > people > > > > > > to try it. The difference in birth time was I believe 45 > > > minutes > > > > > or > > > > > > so if memory serves me right and with that he also made a > > > > > prediction > > > > > > that if this birth time was right then this person would > > have > > > a > > > > > child, > > > > > > and that came true and the native himself came back to the > > > list and > > > > > > acknowledged it which was nice of him. > > > > > > > > > > > > Take charts with known data to practice and build your > > > confidence > > > > > > first and one more thing, the charts that you all are > giving > > > are > > > > > not > > > > > > easy ones as I think easy charts people solve and get > > answers > > > so > > > > > they > > > > > > do not write that on list. Its when the charts are not > > > matching > > > > > that > > > > > > too by senior members they are putting forward on list, so > > > those > > > > > are > > > > > > the 20% of the 80-20 rule also keep that in mind. > > > > > > > > > > > > Otherwise, if u just apply the basic laws, that good > events > > > happen > > > > > in > > > > > > LoD or LoE or highest points u can see a huge % of charts > > > matching > > > > > the > > > > > > criteria. > > > > > > > > > > > > Cheers !!! > > > > > > Ash -> http://www.ashtro.ca > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > , " Anup. M " > > > > > > <dalh_1@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Ramesh, > > > > > > > Thanxs for reviewing this again. > > > > > > > Lets learn more and more with given lessons. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Regards > > > > > > > Anup > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ramesh mishra <aarceemastro2002@> wrote: > > > > > > > Dear Anup, > > > > > > > I checked up your analysis of this chart. Your analysis > is > > > > > perfect > > > > > > but the event does not tally according to data given. > > > > > > > There is no other event also to verify the authenticity > of > > > birth > > > > > time. > > > > > > > So it is simply wasting our time to proceed further with > > > this > > > > > chart. > > > > > > > Time rectification also is fruitless due to > unavailability > > > of > > > > > past > > > > > > events. > > > > > > > I hope u understand this. > > > > > > > Thanks and regards. > > > > > > > Ramesh Mishra > > > > > > > > > > > > > > " Anup. M " <dalh_1@> wrote: > > > > > > > Dear Ash, ramesh and all, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > This chart was given by native's relative and feed back > > was > > > also > > > > > > given accordingly.We can judge the authenticity itself > from > > > the > > > > > chart. > > > > > > > Better we sld go ahead leaving this and learn more > things > > > over > > > > > here > > > > > > without losing time. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Regards > > > > > > > Anup > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ashsam73 <ashsam73@> wrote: > > > > > > > Dear Ramesh, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I think its better to leave this chart. The tone is not > > nice > > > and > > > > > > > neither there is any respect and it is like a chart is > > given > > > for > > > > > > > testing KAS. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I saw this person posted things on another list as well > > > w.r.t > > > > > all this > > > > > > > and is calling names to list members. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > So its better, that we can say that this is an > exceptional > > > chart > > > > > from > > > > > > > KAS system and no laws are matching and better to leave > it > > > > > following > > > > > > > our code of conduct which says that if events are not > > > matching > > > > > then > > > > > > > its better to accept our limitations as human beings. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > There are so many other charts we all can work on. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I hope you will understand where I am coming from. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Atleast that is my humble suggestion. > > > > > > > Cheers !!! > > > > > > > Ash -> http://www.ashtro.ca > > > > > > > > > > > > > > , ramesh > > > mishra > > > > > > > <aarceemastro2002@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear ??, > > > > > > > > If she is married then what is the date of marriage ? > > > > > > > > Will you mind to disclose it ? > > > > > > > > Thanks > > > > > > > > Ramesh Mishra > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > wahaa_2005 <wahaa_2005@> wrote: > > > > > > > > --------[[THE LADY ON THE CASE STUDY IS ALREADY > > > > > > > MARRIED,LEADING A VERY > > > > > > > > HAPPY MARRIED LIFE,MOTHER OF ALREADY 7 YEAR OLD > > > > > DAUGHTER....SHE HAS > > > > > > > > EDUCATION OF M.Phil MATHEMATICS,SIMPLY A HOME > > > MAKER.....HAVING > > > > > VERY > > > > > > > > CARING HUSBAND & LIBERAL INLAWS-FAMILY.....ENJOYING > ALL > > > WORLDLY > > > > > > > > COMFORTS ALTOGATHER]]------------ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > , Anup > > > > > <dalh_1@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > hI all, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Another chart here.... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > DOB 3rd JULY 1976 > > > > > > > > > tob 04.23am > > > > > > > > > lat 20N10 lati 85E42 IST > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Asc 6 G 38 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > In which antra the native may marry? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Full delay by Sat and by Jup.. > > > > > > > > > Two zero in 7th hosue by MARS and Mer > > > > > > > > > DBCE in lagna and Sun in ascending order > > > > > > > > > 6th lord with FK(moon) in Sun navamsa and in lagna > in > > > rashi > > > > > chart > > > > > > > > > Lagna and 7th lord in 6:8 ratio > > > > > > > > > Venus( Nk)in Mars(6th lord) navamsa > > > > > > > > > Moon with 6th lord in rashi > > > > > > > > > Sat delay ends in arround 15-07-2002 in rahu antra > > > > > > > > > Jup delay added one year plus 20% delay added due to > 2 > > > zero > > > > > > > > > Jup wont give the marriage being in house C > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Can Sat antra will give the marriage in 3rd sector? > > > > > > > > > I think it wont as Sat is in house A.. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Will Mer in first sector give the marriage in june > > 2009- > > > apr- > > > > > 2010? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Mer is SD to Venus,Sun,Moon > > > > > > > > > Mer is LOd in 7th hosue > > > > > > > > > Venus , being SD to Mercury, LOE in 12th > > > > > > > > > Moon is LOD in 5th.. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Mer is aspecting House B,but Mer is LoE > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Regards > > > > > > > > > Anup > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Ahhh...imagining that irresistible " new car " smell? > > > > > > > > > Check outnew cars at Autos. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 30, 2007 Report Share Posted May 30, 2007 Dear Ash and Ramesh, Thanxs for all this,I never know this all wld create a hip-hop dat too ... ...though it matters a lot wen past events are nt given ...intetionally..i knw. Being a memeber,i applogise...to the group.. Regards Anup ashsam73 <ashsam73 wrote: Dear Anup and Ramesh, Perfect. Even this chart, if you see, I had not even attempted as not enough data was there. I was just giving guidance to clarify our laws. To get perfect reading, one must have so many events to verify. Have you ever seen Krushnaji just take any chart and attempt it, just go through the archives. In fact in one chart he took it and gave it to the list because after the native gave the events, NONE of the events tallied and Krushanji gave that as an exercise to the list for people to try it. The difference in birth time was I believe 45 minutes or so if memory serves me right and with that he also made a prediction that if this birth time was right then this person would have a child, and that came true and the native himself came back to the list and acknowledged it which was nice of him. Take charts with known data to practice and build your confidence first and one more thing, the charts that you all are giving are not easy ones as I think easy charts people solve and get answers so they do not write that on list. Its when the charts are not matching that too by senior members they are putting forward on list, so those are the 20% of the 80-20 rule also keep that in mind. Otherwise, if u just apply the basic laws, that good events happen in LoD or LoE or highest points u can see a huge % of charts matching the criteria. Cheers !!! Ash -> http://www.ashtro.ca , " Anup. M " <dalh_1 wrote: > > Dear Ramesh, > Thanxs for reviewing this again. > Lets learn more and more with given lessons. > > Regards > Anup ramesh mishra <aarceemastro2002 wrote: > Dear Anup, > I checked up your analysis of this chart. Your analysis is perfect but the event does not tally according to data given. > There is no other event also to verify the authenticity of birth time. > So it is simply wasting our time to proceed further with this chart. > Time rectification also is fruitless due to unavailability of past events. > I hope u understand this. > Thanks and regards. > Ramesh Mishra > > " Anup. M " <dalh_1 wrote: > Dear Ash, ramesh and all, > > This chart was given by native's relative and feed back was also given accordingly.We can judge the authenticity itself from the chart. > Better we sld go ahead leaving this and learn more things over here without losing time. > > Regards > Anup > > ashsam73 <ashsam73 wrote: > Dear Ramesh, > > I think its better to leave this chart. The tone is not nice and > neither there is any respect and it is like a chart is given for > testing KAS. > > I saw this person posted things on another list as well w.r.t all this > and is calling names to list members. > > So its better, that we can say that this is an exceptional chart from > KAS system and no laws are matching and better to leave it following > our code of conduct which says that if events are not matching then > its better to accept our limitations as human beings. > > There are so many other charts we all can work on. > > I hope you will understand where I am coming from. > > Atleast that is my humble suggestion. > Cheers !!! > Ash -> http://www.ashtro.ca > > , ramesh mishra > <aarceemastro2002@> wrote: > > > > Dear ??, > > If she is married then what is the date of marriage ? > > Will you mind to disclose it ? > > Thanks > > Ramesh Mishra > > > > wahaa_2005 <wahaa_2005@> wrote: > > --------[[THE LADY ON THE CASE STUDY IS ALREADY > MARRIED,LEADING A VERY > > HAPPY MARRIED LIFE,MOTHER OF ALREADY 7 YEAR OLD DAUGHTER....SHE HAS > > EDUCATION OF M.Phil MATHEMATICS,SIMPLY A HOME MAKER.....HAVING VERY > > CARING HUSBAND & LIBERAL INLAWS-FAMILY.....ENJOYING ALL WORLDLY > > COMFORTS ALTOGATHER]]------------ > > > > , Anup <dalh_1@> wrote: > > > > > > hI all, > > > > > > > > > > > > Another chart here.... > > > > > > DOB 3rd JULY 1976 > > > tob 04.23am > > > lat 20N10 lati 85E42 IST > > > > > > Asc 6 G 38 > > > > > > In which antra the native may marry? > > > > > > Full delay by Sat and by Jup.. > > > Two zero in 7th hosue by MARS and Mer > > > DBCE in lagna and Sun in ascending order > > > 6th lord with FK(moon) in Sun navamsa and in lagna in rashi chart > > > Lagna and 7th lord in 6:8 ratio > > > Venus( Nk)in Mars(6th lord) navamsa > > > Moon with 6th lord in rashi > > > Sat delay ends in arround 15-07-2002 in rahu antra > > > Jup delay added one year plus 20% delay added due to 2 zero > > > Jup wont give the marriage being in house C > > > > > > Can Sat antra will give the marriage in 3rd sector? > > > I think it wont as Sat is in house A.. > > > > > > Will Mer in first sector give the marriage in june 2009-apr-2010? > > > > > > Mer is SD to Venus,Sun,Moon > > > Mer is LOd in 7th hosue > > > Venus , being SD to Mercury, LOE in 12th > > > Moon is LOD in 5th.. > > > > > > Mer is aspecting House B,but Mer is LoE > > > > > > > > > Regards > > > Anup > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Ahhh...imagining that irresistible " new car " smell? > > > Check outnew cars at Autos. > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 30, 2007 Report Share Posted May 30, 2007 dear Ash, i also want to tell u,i have been also a member in this group as id sushreesp perhaps 2years back. a doctor's job is not to keep fighting with the patient " why did you give me wrong information? " but to diagnose using his own knowledge & expertise. regards, wahaa jahan(sushreesp) , " ashsam73 " <ashsam73 wrote: > > Dear Wahaa, > > That is because I try to get some sleep at night :-). > > Have u read the list attributes? if not just take a few moments to > read that as well. Its clearly written that all mails from new > members are moderated. > > Just so that u are upto date and understand something about that list > which is that this is a specific KAS list and here we discuss KAS. > This is not a general discussion list. > > This list is not MY list, its the list created by the efforts of our > teacher Krushnaji to teach us KAS and for discussion of KAS. > > You are free to discuss KAS should you so like, but causing > disturbance by unnecessary provocation or name calling to members will > not be tolerated and you shall be banned. > > I hope its clear now. > Cheers !!! > Ash -> http://www.ashtro.ca > Moderator > > > , " wahaa_2005 " > <wahaa_2005@> wrote: > > > > dear mr. Ash, > > when i saw blocking of my mails on your site for so long time, > > i already sent message on satis's messenger that her marriage > > was solemnised in feb,1999.she delivered her baby on 10 Dec.2000 in > > VSS medical college,burla,sambalpur,Orissa! > > > > for analysis,i gave birth of the baby as hint to catch the thread on > > analysis.... > > now what is left to decide on my sister-in-law's marriage date of > > marriage? > > i have already revealed her date of marriage to satis. > > thanks ! > > wahaa jahan > > > > just some time after that i saw all my mails got posted on this site! > > > > , " ashsam73 " > > <ashsam73@> wrote: > > > > > > Dear Anup and Ramesh, > > > > > > Perfect. Even this chart, if you see, I had not even attempted as > > not > > > enough data was there. > > > > > > I was just giving guidance to clarify our laws. > > > > > > To get perfect reading, one must have so many events to verify. > > Have > > > you ever seen Krushnaji just take any chart and attempt it, just go > > > through the archives. In fact in one chart he took it and gave it > > to > > > the list because after the native gave the events, NONE of the > > events > > > tallied and Krushanji gave that as an exercise to the list for > > people > > > to try it. The difference in birth time was I believe 45 minutes > > or > > > so if memory serves me right and with that he also made a > > prediction > > > that if this birth time was right then this person would have a > > child, > > > and that came true and the native himself came back to the list and > > > acknowledged it which was nice of him. > > > > > > Take charts with known data to practice and build your confidence > > > first and one more thing, the charts that you all are giving are > > not > > > easy ones as I think easy charts people solve and get answers so > > they > > > do not write that on list. Its when the charts are not matching > > that > > > too by senior members they are putting forward on list, so those > > are > > > the 20% of the 80-20 rule also keep that in mind. > > > > > > Otherwise, if u just apply the basic laws, that good events happen > > in > > > LoD or LoE or highest points u can see a huge % of charts matching > > the > > > criteria. > > > > > > Cheers !!! > > > Ash -> http://www.ashtro.ca > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > , " Anup. M " > > > <dalh_1@> wrote: > > > > > > > > Dear Ramesh, > > > > Thanxs for reviewing this again. > > > > Lets learn more and more with given lessons. > > > > > > > > Regards > > > > Anup > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ramesh mishra <aarceemastro2002@> wrote: > > > > Dear Anup, > > > > I checked up your analysis of this chart. Your analysis is > > perfect > > > but the event does not tally according to data given. > > > > There is no other event also to verify the authenticity of birth > > time. > > > > So it is simply wasting our time to proceed further with this > > chart. > > > > Time rectification also is fruitless due to unavailability of > > past > > > events. > > > > I hope u understand this. > > > > Thanks and regards. > > > > Ramesh Mishra > > > > > > > > " Anup. M " <dalh_1@> wrote: > > > > Dear Ash, ramesh and all, > > > > > > > > This chart was given by native's relative and feed back was also > > > given accordingly.We can judge the authenticity itself from the > > chart. > > > > Better we sld go ahead leaving this and learn more things over > > here > > > without losing time. > > > > > > > > Regards > > > > Anup > > > > > > > > ashsam73 <ashsam73@> wrote: > > > > Dear Ramesh, > > > > > > > > I think its better to leave this chart. The tone is not nice and > > > > neither there is any respect and it is like a chart is given for > > > > testing KAS. > > > > > > > > I saw this person posted things on another list as well w.r.t > > all this > > > > and is calling names to list members. > > > > > > > > So its better, that we can say that this is an exceptional chart > > from > > > > KAS system and no laws are matching and better to leave it > > following > > > > our code of conduct which says that if events are not matching > > then > > > > its better to accept our limitations as human beings. > > > > > > > > There are so many other charts we all can work on. > > > > > > > > I hope you will understand where I am coming from. > > > > > > > > Atleast that is my humble suggestion. > > > > Cheers !!! > > > > Ash -> http://www.ashtro.ca > > > > > > > > , ramesh mishra > > > > <aarceemastro2002@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Dear ??, > > > > > If she is married then what is the date of marriage ? > > > > > Will you mind to disclose it ? > > > > > Thanks > > > > > Ramesh Mishra > > > > > > > > > > wahaa_2005 <wahaa_2005@> wrote: > > > > > --------[[THE LADY ON THE CASE STUDY IS ALREADY > > > > MARRIED,LEADING A VERY > > > > > HAPPY MARRIED LIFE,MOTHER OF ALREADY 7 YEAR OLD > > DAUGHTER....SHE HAS > > > > > EDUCATION OF M.Phil MATHEMATICS,SIMPLY A HOME MAKER.....HAVING > > VERY > > > > > CARING HUSBAND & LIBERAL INLAWS-FAMILY.....ENJOYING ALL WORLDLY > > > > > COMFORTS ALTOGATHER]]------------ > > > > > > > > > > , Anup > > <dalh_1@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > hI all, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Another chart here.... > > > > > > > > > > > > DOB 3rd JULY 1976 > > > > > > tob 04.23am > > > > > > lat 20N10 lati 85E42 IST > > > > > > > > > > > > Asc 6 G 38 > > > > > > > > > > > > In which antra the native may marry? > > > > > > > > > > > > Full delay by Sat and by Jup.. > > > > > > Two zero in 7th hosue by MARS and Mer > > > > > > DBCE in lagna and Sun in ascending order > > > > > > 6th lord with FK(moon) in Sun navamsa and in lagna in rashi > > chart > > > > > > Lagna and 7th lord in 6:8 ratio > > > > > > Venus( Nk)in Mars(6th lord) navamsa > > > > > > Moon with 6th lord in rashi > > > > > > Sat delay ends in arround 15-07-2002 in rahu antra > > > > > > Jup delay added one year plus 20% delay added due to 2 zero > > > > > > Jup wont give the marriage being in house C > > > > > > > > > > > > Can Sat antra will give the marriage in 3rd sector? > > > > > > I think it wont as Sat is in house A.. > > > > > > > > > > > > Will Mer in first sector give the marriage in june 2009- apr- > > 2010? > > > > > > > > > > > > Mer is SD to Venus,Sun,Moon > > > > > > Mer is LOd in 7th hosue > > > > > > Venus , being SD to Mercury, LOE in 12th > > > > > > Moon is LOD in 5th.. > > > > > > > > > > > > Mer is aspecting House B,but Mer is LoE > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Regards > > > > > > Anup > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Ahhh...imagining that irresistible " new car " smell? > > > > > > Check outnew cars at Autos. > > > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 30, 2007 Report Share Posted May 30, 2007 anup ji, i spent almost a month with u asking u dis dat only that u do research on astrology in right direction...for what?...only 4your growth. but i felt u did not take me seriously! wahaa jahan(sushreesp) , " Anup. M " <dalh_1 wrote: > > Dear Ash and Ramesh, > Thanxs for all this,I never know this all wld create a hip-hop dat too ... > ...though it matters a lot wen past events are nt given ...intetionally..i knw. > Being a memeber,i applogise...to the group.. > > Regards > Anup > > > > ashsam73 <ashsam73 wrote: > Dear Anup and Ramesh, > > Perfect. Even this chart, if you see, I had not even attempted as not > enough data was there. > > I was just giving guidance to clarify our laws. > > To get perfect reading, one must have so many events to verify. Have > you ever seen Krushnaji just take any chart and attempt it, just go > through the archives. In fact in one chart he took it and gave it to > the list because after the native gave the events, NONE of the events > tallied and Krushanji gave that as an exercise to the list for people > to try it. The difference in birth time was I believe 45 minutes or > so if memory serves me right and with that he also made a prediction > that if this birth time was right then this person would have a child, > and that came true and the native himself came back to the list and > acknowledged it which was nice of him. > > Take charts with known data to practice and build your confidence > first and one more thing, the charts that you all are giving are not > easy ones as I think easy charts people solve and get answers so they > do not write that on list. Its when the charts are not matching that > too by senior members they are putting forward on list, so those are > the 20% of the 80-20 rule also keep that in mind. > > Otherwise, if u just apply the basic laws, that good events happen in > LoD or LoE or highest points u can see a huge % of charts matching the > criteria. > > Cheers !!! > Ash -> http://www.ashtro.ca > > , " Anup. M " > <dalh_1@> wrote: > > > > Dear Ramesh, > > Thanxs for reviewing this again. > > Lets learn more and more with given lessons. > > > > Regards > > Anup > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ramesh mishra <aarceemastro2002@> wrote: > > Dear Anup, > > I checked up your analysis of this chart. Your analysis is perfect > but the event does not tally according to data given. > > There is no other event also to verify the authenticity of birth time. > > So it is simply wasting our time to proceed further with this chart. > > Time rectification also is fruitless due to unavailability of past > events. > > I hope u understand this. > > Thanks and regards. > > Ramesh Mishra > > > > " Anup. M " <dalh_1@> wrote: > > Dear Ash, ramesh and all, > > > > This chart was given by native's relative and feed back was also > given accordingly.We can judge the authenticity itself from the chart. > > Better we sld go ahead leaving this and learn more things over here > without losing time. > > > > Regards > > Anup > > > > ashsam73 <ashsam73@> wrote: > > Dear Ramesh, > > > > I think its better to leave this chart. The tone is not nice and > > neither there is any respect and it is like a chart is given for > > testing KAS. > > > > I saw this person posted things on another list as well w.r.t all this > > and is calling names to list members. > > > > So its better, that we can say that this is an exceptional chart from > > KAS system and no laws are matching and better to leave it following > > our code of conduct which says that if events are not matching then > > its better to accept our limitations as human beings. > > > > There are so many other charts we all can work on. > > > > I hope you will understand where I am coming from. > > > > Atleast that is my humble suggestion. > > Cheers !!! > > Ash -> http://www.ashtro.ca > > > > , ramesh mishra > > <aarceemastro2002@> wrote: > > > > > > Dear ??, > > > If she is married then what is the date of marriage ? > > > Will you mind to disclose it ? > > > Thanks > > > Ramesh Mishra > > > > > > wahaa_2005 <wahaa_2005@> wrote: > > > --------[[THE LADY ON THE CASE STUDY IS ALREADY > > MARRIED,LEADING A VERY > > > HAPPY MARRIED LIFE,MOTHER OF ALREADY 7 YEAR OLD DAUGHTER....SHE HAS > > > EDUCATION OF M.Phil MATHEMATICS,SIMPLY A HOME MAKER.....HAVING VERY > > > CARING HUSBAND & LIBERAL INLAWS-FAMILY.....ENJOYING ALL WORLDLY > > > COMFORTS ALTOGATHER]]------------ > > > > > > , Anup <dalh_1@> wrote: > > > > > > > > hI all, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Another chart here.... > > > > > > > > DOB 3rd JULY 1976 > > > > tob 04.23am > > > > lat 20N10 lati 85E42 IST > > > > > > > > Asc 6 G 38 > > > > > > > > In which antra the native may marry? > > > > > > > > Full delay by Sat and by Jup.. > > > > Two zero in 7th hosue by MARS and Mer > > > > DBCE in lagna and Sun in ascending order > > > > 6th lord with FK(moon) in Sun navamsa and in lagna in rashi chart > > > > Lagna and 7th lord in 6:8 ratio > > > > Venus( Nk)in Mars(6th lord) navamsa > > > > Moon with 6th lord in rashi > > > > Sat delay ends in arround 15-07-2002 in rahu antra > > > > Jup delay added one year plus 20% delay added due to 2 zero > > > > Jup wont give the marriage being in house C > > > > > > > > Can Sat antra will give the marriage in 3rd sector? > > > > I think it wont as Sat is in house A.. > > > > > > > > Will Mer in first sector give the marriage in june 2009-apr- 2010? > > > > > > > > Mer is SD to Venus,Sun,Moon > > > > Mer is LOd in 7th hosue > > > > Venus , being SD to Mercury, LOE in 12th > > > > Moon is LOD in 5th.. > > > > > > > > Mer is aspecting House B,but Mer is LoE > > > > > > > > > > > > Regards > > > > Anup > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Ahhh...imagining that irresistible " new car " smell? > > > > Check outnew cars at Autos. > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 30, 2007 Report Share Posted May 30, 2007 Anup ji, plz also give a thought,what query i am asking here as for some consultation that i will take with me free of cost from you,people! Nothing...,rather i am giving! regards, wahaa jahan(sushreesp) , " wahaa_2005 " <wahaa_2005 wrote: > > anup ji, > i spent almost a month with u asking u dis dat only that u do > research on astrology in right direction...for what?...only 4your > growth. > but i felt u did not take me seriously! > wahaa jahan(sushreesp) > > , " Anup. M " > <dalh_1@> wrote: > > > > Dear Ash and Ramesh, > > Thanxs for all this,I never know this all wld create a hip-hop > dat too ... > > ...though it matters a lot wen past events are nt > given ...intetionally..i knw. > > Being a memeber,i applogise...to the group.. > > > > Regards > > Anup > > > > > > > > ashsam73 <ashsam73@> wrote: > > Dear Anup and Ramesh, > > > > Perfect. Even this chart, if you see, I had not even attempted as > not > > enough data was there. > > > > I was just giving guidance to clarify our laws. > > > > To get perfect reading, one must have so many events to verify. > Have > > you ever seen Krushnaji just take any chart and attempt it, just go > > through the archives. In fact in one chart he took it and gave it > to > > the list because after the native gave the events, NONE of the > events > > tallied and Krushanji gave that as an exercise to the list for > people > > to try it. The difference in birth time was I believe 45 minutes or > > so if memory serves me right and with that he also made a > prediction > > that if this birth time was right then this person would have a > child, > > and that came true and the native himself came back to the list and > > acknowledged it which was nice of him. > > > > Take charts with known data to practice and build your confidence > > first and one more thing, the charts that you all are giving are > not > > easy ones as I think easy charts people solve and get answers so > they > > do not write that on list. Its when the charts are not matching > that > > too by senior members they are putting forward on list, so those > are > > the 20% of the 80-20 rule also keep that in mind. > > > > Otherwise, if u just apply the basic laws, that good events happen > in > > LoD or LoE or highest points u can see a huge % of charts matching > the > > criteria. > > > > Cheers !!! > > Ash -> http://www.ashtro.ca > > > > , " Anup. M " > > <dalh_1@> wrote: > > > > > > Dear Ramesh, > > > Thanxs for reviewing this again. > > > Lets learn more and more with given lessons. > > > > > > Regards > > > Anup > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ramesh mishra <aarceemastro2002@> wrote: > > > Dear Anup, > > > I checked up your analysis of this chart. Your analysis is > perfect > > but the event does not tally according to data given. > > > There is no other event also to verify the authenticity of birth > time. > > > So it is simply wasting our time to proceed further with this > chart. > > > Time rectification also is fruitless due to unavailability of > past > > events. > > > I hope u understand this. > > > Thanks and regards. > > > Ramesh Mishra > > > > > > " Anup. M " <dalh_1@> wrote: > > > Dear Ash, ramesh and all, > > > > > > This chart was given by native's relative and feed back was also > > given accordingly.We can judge the authenticity itself from the > chart. > > > Better we sld go ahead leaving this and learn more things over > here > > without losing time. > > > > > > Regards > > > Anup > > > > > > ashsam73 <ashsam73@> wrote: > > > Dear Ramesh, > > > > > > I think its better to leave this chart. The tone is not nice and > > > neither there is any respect and it is like a chart is given for > > > testing KAS. > > > > > > I saw this person posted things on another list as well w.r.t > all this > > > and is calling names to list members. > > > > > > So its better, that we can say that this is an exceptional chart > from > > > KAS system and no laws are matching and better to leave it > following > > > our code of conduct which says that if events are not matching > then > > > its better to accept our limitations as human beings. > > > > > > There are so many other charts we all can work on. > > > > > > I hope you will understand where I am coming from. > > > > > > Atleast that is my humble suggestion. > > > Cheers !!! > > > Ash -> http://www.ashtro.ca > > > > > > , ramesh mishra > > > <aarceemastro2002@> wrote: > > > > > > > > Dear ??, > > > > If she is married then what is the date of marriage ? > > > > Will you mind to disclose it ? > > > > Thanks > > > > Ramesh Mishra > > > > > > > > wahaa_2005 <wahaa_2005@> wrote: > > > > --------[[THE LADY ON THE CASE STUDY IS ALREADY > > > MARRIED,LEADING A VERY > > > > HAPPY MARRIED LIFE,MOTHER OF ALREADY 7 YEAR OLD > DAUGHTER....SHE HAS > > > > EDUCATION OF M.Phil MATHEMATICS,SIMPLY A HOME MAKER.....HAVING > VERY > > > > CARING HUSBAND & LIBERAL INLAWS-FAMILY.....ENJOYING ALL WORLDLY > > > > COMFORTS ALTOGATHER]]------------ > > > > > > > > , Anup > <dalh_1@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > hI all, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Another chart here.... > > > > > > > > > > DOB 3rd JULY 1976 > > > > > tob 04.23am > > > > > lat 20N10 lati 85E42 IST > > > > > > > > > > Asc 6 G 38 > > > > > > > > > > In which antra the native may marry? > > > > > > > > > > Full delay by Sat and by Jup.. > > > > > Two zero in 7th hosue by MARS and Mer > > > > > DBCE in lagna and Sun in ascending order > > > > > 6th lord with FK(moon) in Sun navamsa and in lagna in rashi > chart > > > > > Lagna and 7th lord in 6:8 ratio > > > > > Venus( Nk)in Mars(6th lord) navamsa > > > > > Moon with 6th lord in rashi > > > > > Sat delay ends in arround 15-07-2002 in rahu antra > > > > > Jup delay added one year plus 20% delay added due to 2 zero > > > > > Jup wont give the marriage being in house C > > > > > > > > > > Can Sat antra will give the marriage in 3rd sector? > > > > > I think it wont as Sat is in house A.. > > > > > > > > > > Will Mer in first sector give the marriage in june 2009- apr- > 2010? > > > > > > > > > > Mer is SD to Venus,Sun,Moon > > > > > Mer is LOd in 7th hosue > > > > > Venus , being SD to Mercury, LOE in 12th > > > > > Moon is LOD in 5th.. > > > > > > > > > > Mer is aspecting House B,but Mer is LoE > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Regards > > > > > Anup > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Ahhh...imagining that irresistible " new car " smell? > > > > > Check outnew cars at Autos. > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.