Guest guest Posted June 27, 2007 Report Share Posted June 27, 2007 Dear ramesh, Why would blessing only nullify Saturn delay and not Jupiter delay ? Satish --- ramesh mishra <aarceemastro2002 wrote: > Dear Ash, Anup, Tom and all, > I could not participate this discussion due to my > busy schedule. > However I had gone through the messages posted by > you all. > In this context I would like to congratulate Anup > for the correct approach. > Now seriously I checked up the chart of this > native. > As Tom declared that the marriage of this native > took place on 14 Feb 98. > Since the asc falls in border line I analysed the > chart taking both the lagnas as Cp and Aq but could > not find the convincing results for marriage. > Here is my reasoning. > 1.When the lagna is Cp. > There is full delay by Sa and Ju both. > Ju aspects Sa causing moderation of delay. But > this moderation goes waste because Ju itself is in > the nak. ruled by Sa. > Therefore the cumulative delay ends on 11 Apr 98. > The period falls in Sa main and Ra antara 2nd > sector.So Ra should not give marriage. > In fact marriage took place during same period . > Blessings are presen in navamsa so the delay could > be nullified. > When you consider the nullification of delay then > marriageable age falls after 24 yrs. > Here I consider the nullification of delay caused > by Sa only.Since the delay is due to Ju also, so the > marriage should take place when Ju completes its two > rounds of the chart. > Ju enters Sc rasi on 08 Nov 94 and during this > time native was passing through Sa main and Mo > antar. > Mo being strongly positioned in 2nd house can not > give the event. > The following antara of Ma being LoD and strong in > WS could have given its result in the third sector. > But it did not happen. > It means there is some delay in the event. Reasons > may be due to quality of relationship . > Me is here 6th lord and occupy 4th house. Me is > with Ve the NK of marriage. > Thereby Me spoils the 4th house and Nk. Ve is also > spoiled by the aspect of Ma. > Both the luminaries are affected by the aspect of > Sa. > Me (6th lord) and Ve (NK) are very close to one > another degreewise. > The relationship between 7th lord from lagna,Su > and Mo is 4:10, 4:10 and 4:10. > Ra is SD to Sa and Ma.When Ma was unable to give > the event its SD has done the job. > 2.When asc is Aq. > I got asc as 1 Aq 17. I could not understand how > Anup got asc as 1 Aq 14. > Here also blessings are present in navamsa. > Here also the delay is due to Sa and Ju. > In this case 7th house is aspected by Mo with > malefic sight. > All the planets except Mo are strong in WS. > LoD is Ve who is in 12th from its own house so > naturally Ve is out of this race. > As before delay ends on 8 Nov 94 during Sa-Mo. > Ma is here in house E with 2 bindus only therefore > antar of Ma is eliminated. > The following Ra antara is SD to LoE with strong > 17 points capable to give the event. > Thus I found that Aq lagna is more suitable than > Cp lagna. > Thanks and regards. > Ramesh Mishra > > ______________________________\ ____ Now that's room service! Choose from over 150,000 hotels in 45,000 destinations on Travel to find your fit. http://farechase./promo-generic-14795097 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.