Jump to content
IndiaDivine.org

Dear Ash et All :On the Creation of Universe and Cosmology as applicable to

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

Resp. Ashji,

more over current antra of rahu samdhari to venus and mars.

mars have more points for 12th compared to 11th.

venus has 20 for 11th and 17 for 12th.

rahu in 9th house triggers 12th and 4th house.

so mars points in ws and rahu's position points to more expenditure in

current antra.

moreover antras of mars,saturn,moon,mercury and sun have less points

in worsheet for 11th house compared to 12th.

only jupiter and venus have a just little more points in 11th compared

to 12th.

plus the sav in 12th is more than 11th.

dont we take mean of sav from sun,moon and lagna ?

anything wrong in my thinking?

thanks/regards

harjeet

 

, " Ash " <kas wrote:

>

> Dear Amit,

>

>

>

> With this data u have given,

>

>

>

> 19th May 1986

>

> 12:10 PM

>

> New Delhi

Planet

>

> Degrees

>

>

> As

>

> 5 Le 38

>

>

> Su

>

> 5 Ta 14

>

>

> Mo

>

> 2 Vi 38

>

>

> Ma

>

> 27 Sg 51

>

>

> Me

>

> 0 Ta 39

>

>

> Ju

>

> 25 Aq 40

>

>

> Ve

>

> 4 Ge 28

>

>

> SaR

>

> 14 Sc 17

>

>

> Ra

>

> 5 Ar 44

>

>

> Ke

>

> 5 Li 44

>

>

House

>

> 1

>

> 2

>

> 3

>

> 4

>

> 5

>

> 6

>

> 7

>

> 8

>

> 9

>

> 10

>

> 11

>

> 12

>

>

>

>

> Sun

>

<file:///C:\Documents%20and%20Settings\ENagawkar\Desktop\KASMaster.xls#BAV!T

> 7#BAV!T7>

>

> 10

>

> 3

>

> 3

>

> 4

>

> 5

>

> 5

>

> 4

>

> 4

>

> 3

>

> 1

>

> 4

>

> 6

>

> 6

>

> 48

>

>

> Moon

>

<file:///C:\Documents%20and%20Settings\ENagawkar\Desktop\KASMaster.xls#BAV!A

> J7#BAV!AJ7>

>

> 2

>

> 4

>

> 6

>

> 4

>

> 4

>

> 4

>

> 4

>

> 6

>

> 5

>

> 3

>

> 4

>

> 2

>

> 3

>

> 49

>

>

> Mars

>

<file:///C:\Documents%20and%20Settings\ENagawkar\Desktop\KASMaster.xls#BAV!D

> 34#BAV!D34>

>

> 5

>

> 2

>

> 4

>

> 4

>

> 4

>

> 2

>

> 4

>

> 3

>

> 3

>

> 1

>

> 3

>

> 3

>

> 6

>

> 39

>

>

> Mercury

>

<file:///C:\Documents%20and%20Settings\ENagawkar\Desktop\KASMaster.xls#BAV!T

> 34#BAV!T34>

>

> 10

>

> 4

>

> 7

>

> 5

>

> 2

>

> 4

>

> 6

>

> 4

>

> 4

>

> 4

>

> 3

>

> 5

>

> 6

>

> 54

>

>

> Jupiter

>

<file:///C:\Documents%20and%20Settings\ENagawkar\Desktop\KASMaster.xls#BAV!A

> J34#BAV!AJ34>

>

> 7

>

> 4

>

> 4

>

> 5

>

> 4

>

> 4

>

> 6

>

> 5

>

> 7

>

> 4

>

> 5

>

> 4

>

> 4

>

> 56

>

>

> Venus

>

<file:///C:\Documents%20and%20Settings\ENagawkar\Desktop\KASMaster.xls#BAV!G

> 61#BAV!G61>

>

> 11

>

> 5

>

> 6

>

> 6

>

> 4

>

> 4

>

> 4

>

> 3

>

> 5

>

> 5

>

> 2

>

> 4

>

> 4

>

> 52

>

>

> Saturn

>

<file:///C:\Documents%20and%20Settings\ENagawkar\Desktop\KASMaster.xls#BAV!T

> 61#BAV!T61>

>

> 4

>

> 2

>

> 2

>

> 3

>

> 5

>

> 3

>

> 4

>

> 4

>

> 3

>

> 4

>

> 4

>

> 3

>

> 2

>

> 39

>

>

> Totals

>

>

>

> 24

>

> 32

>

> 31

>

> 28

>

> 26

>

> 32

>

> 29

>

> 30

>

> 22

>

> 25

>

> 27

>

> 31

>

> 337

>

>

>

>

>

> The points in 12th are more than 11th.

>

>

>

> In any case, let it be.

>

>

>

> Cheers !!!

>

> Ash -> <http://www.ashtro.ca> http://www.ashtro.ca

>

> _____

>

>

> On Behalf Of planck12

> Wednesday September 12, 2007 7:58 PM

>

> Re: Dear Ash et All :On the

Creation of

> Universe and Cosmology as applicable to

>

>

>

> Dear Ash,

> Yes, I completely concur and thats all I wanted to clarify from my

> end. Again before I leave I have another chart if anyone wants to use

> from educational stand point.

>

> 19 May 1986

> 12:10pm

> new delhi.

>

> Again i decided to relate the 11/12th house points, in this chart

> again the worksheet decided to give more points in 11th house than

> 12th. But the girl has no savings, he is quite spendrift and have

> numerous expenses as compared to her income.

>

> Also to double check other things, i decided to check other factors,

> her brillancy for that matter. I think she has two parts in saturn

> degrees as shown with the work sheet. But she is not very intelligent,

> again a decent girl who is quite jovial, but she has done a

> certificate course and works in a local bank. As I understand it from

> the notes if one part is in saturn then person has odinary

> intelligence and if two he/she has good intelligence. In her case she

> is normal like anyone else who has no part in saturns division.

>

> Feel free to check, incase there are other things required, as is

> always the case in terms of details.

>

> 1. The girl is unmarried

> 2. Wheatish complexion

> 3. works in a bank as teller

> 4. From a middle class family

> 5. Has good morals, but tends to be energetic and hyper at times

>

> regards

> Nicked Vish (Amit) I prefer Vish

>

> astrologyandtiminge

> <%40>

vents ,

> " Ash " <kas@> wrote:

> >

> > Dear Amit / Vishy (?),

> >

> >

> >

> > Everyone is entitled to their own opinion and All the more reason we

> should

> > get back to KAS :-)

> >

> > Cheers !!!

> >

> > Ash -> <http://www.ashtro. <http://www.ashtro.ca> ca>

http://www.ashtro.

> <http://www.ashtro.ca> ca

> >

> > _____

> >

> > astrologyandtiminge

> <%40>

vents

> > [astrologyandtiminge

> <%40>

vents ]

> On Behalf Of

> astroquery12

> > Wednesday September 12, 2007 7:11 PM

> > astrologyandtiminge

> <%40>

vents

> > Dear Ash et All :On the

Creation of

> > Universe and Cosmology as applicable to Astr

> >

> >

> >

> > Hi,

> > Hope you are doing well. This is Amit again, had posted under a

> > different name prior but that account did not seem to work and had to

> > create a new id.

> >

> > I have been following the lessons for a while and again I see many

> > in-consistencies with the system. My intention is not to refute or

> > accept the system but purely to learn it and see it practicality and

> > in the process provide my thoughts in opinions (after all the

> > astrology forum is a free form for discussion). Some of my doubts have

> > cropped up again with the usual, 11th house points vs 12th house

> > points and the actual condition of the charts (again this is only

> > treating the chart with KAS)as opposed to mixing parashra or k.p etc.

> >

> > On another note, perhaps I can take the liberty to explain again on

> > why this happens and hopefully you concur with my points and facts.

> > After all astrology will make more meaning if we understand it from

> > all angles. You are a computer scientist (a man of science) yourself

> > and perhaps this description will make sense and will take a purely

> > scientific approach to it:

> >

> > I am sure you are familiar at least on the basic level with Einstein's

> > relativity and the other theory called Quantum Mechanics. During the

> > creation of the universe at the point of big bang it is widely

> > believed that there were four fundamental forces in the universe:

> > Gravity, electromagnetic, weak nuclear and strong nuclear. It is also

> > now very well accepted that relativity explains Gravity very elegantly

> > and that the theory has been tested to the point of calculations

> > pertaning to perhilion of mercury (closest pass to the sun) with

> > accuracy. On the other hand Quantum mechanics has done well in

> > unifying the other three forces of the electromagnetic and nuclear

> > nature. BUT a BIG TWIST comes into the picture.

> >

> > Realivity claims that events (spacetime continum is 4D) are all

> > associated together and there is no concept of past and future or

> > present and in simple terms the destiney is already written and

> > nothing can change it, so given the right set of laws one can predict

> > the course of life and the cosmos (relativistic conditions on

> > cosmology)to a complete accurate picture based on fundametal field

> > equations of einstein. Again Einstein spent much of his life finding a

> > Unified theory that would unify electromagnetics with gravity BUT

> FAILED.

> >

> > On the other hand QUANTUM MECHANICS claims that nothing in life is

> > predictable infact everything is a probability. And QM explains atoms

> > etc the world of sub atomic very well (this would include the brain)

> > the body etc, after all brain is essential a complex neural network

> > working on neurotransmitters signals which are electrical in nature.

> > So it is quite justified that QM is applicable to us as well since we

> > are made of atoms, eletrons etc. But the problem you run into with QM

> > is that nothing is certain and that everything is described as a

> > probablity wave function of something called the scrhorodingers

> > equation. I would want you to refer to the thought experiment termed

> > " Schroender's Cat " which is hard for me to explain on this fourm but I

> > am sure you will take the initiative of reading it, in short every

> > observation made my an reference observer will change the course of

> > this obervation directly or indirectly depending on the observation

> > being made. Simply put, there is too much random ness existent in this

> > universe to be able to describe anything in any accruancy, especially

> > when it comes to life or the atomic scale.

> >

> > Now applying the above theories to describe astrology, many of the

> > General predictions we make about the past or even the future at times

> > happen to come true, yet there are many more predictions we made that

> > do not come true at all. Because we are juggling between certainity

> > and chaos and that is not the fault or positive aspect of anyone

> > astrological system but rather the law of nature (God if you may call

> > it). You have claimed in your past emails that KAS is very accurate

> > however on my sincere application of these principles I have found it

> > smiliar to any other system because the rate of predicition does not

> > change much as compared to prashara or k.p or jaimini for that

matter.

> >

> > It is however a different story if we only look at the positive aspect

> > and not realise the shortcomings of any system. My approach is to look

> > at the short comings of this system simply because it might help

> > improve the system in some other way (again thats not job). My sole

> > intention for this posting has been to again reiterate on a scientific

> > ground the limitations of astrology and that of human mind and that no

> > matter how hard we try we will be bound by many contraints. You might

> > claim that KAS predictions have come true, but I have applied basic

> > principles of many charts some of which have yielded results but again

> > some of them have not yielded the correct results (this I see with an

> > open mind) leading me to believe and again affirm with the view that

> > astrology has limitations on what can be predicted. Any when we are

> > bound by such limitations then ethically we should take a more

> > cautious approach in predicting in the first place and perhaps a more

> > understanding, less materialistic (making money out of astrology)

> > attitude in researching things. This would also involve being open to

> > genuine thoughts weather pro or against any system in the betterment

> > of knowledge.

> >

> > To end it Einstein once said " God does not play dice with the

> > Universe " on seeing Quatum Mechanics back in the 30s he was

> > diasspointed with QM because he felt there was no free will and that

> > there was no such thing as probablity. A famous Quautum Theorist (I

> > will let you figure out who) responded by saying " Not only does God

> > play dice with Us, He also puts it in places where we cannot find

it " .

> >

> > :) I hope you see this message not as a threat to your system but

> > rather as an open ended question to ponder on keeping aside

> > ego,predjuice or any other negative emotions.

> >

> > regards and Best

> > Amit

> >

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dear Harjeet,

 

J

 

 

Cheers !!!

Ash -> http://www.ashtro.ca

 

 

 

 

 

On Behalf Of harjeet bakshi

Thursday September 13, 2007

11:19 AM

 

Subject:

Re: Dear Ash et All :On the Creation of Universe and

Cosmology as applicable to

 

 

 

 

 

Resp. Ashji,

more over current antra of rahu samdhari to venus and mars.

mars have more points for 12th compared to 11th.

venus has 20 for 11th and 17 for 12th.

rahu in 9th house triggers 12th and 4th house.

so mars points in ws and rahu's position points to more expenditure in

current antra.

moreover antras of mars,saturn,moon,mercury and sun have less points

in worsheet for 11th house compared to 12th.

only jupiter and venus have a just little more points in 11th compared

to 12th.

plus the sav in 12th is more than 11th.

dont we take mean of sav from sun,moon and lagna ?

anything wrong in my thinking?

thanks/regards

harjeet

 

,

" Ash " <kas wrote:

>

> Dear Amit,

>

>

>

> With this data u have given,

>

>

>

> 19th May 1986

>

> 12:10 PM

>

> New Delhi

>

>

>

>

>

>

> Planet

>

> Degrees

>

>

> As

>

> 5 Le 38

>

>

> Su

>

> 5 Ta 14

>

>

> Mo

>

> 2 Vi 38

>

>

> Ma

>

> 27 Sg 51

>

>

> Me

>

> 0 Ta 39

>

>

> Ju

>

> 25 Aq 40

>

>

> Ve

>

> 4 Ge 28

>

>

> SaR

>

> 14 Sc 17

>

>

> Ra

>

> 5 Ar 44

>

>

> Ke

>

> 5 Li 44

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

> House

>

> 1

>

> 2

>

> 3

>

> 4

>

> 5

>

> 6

>

> 7

>

> 8

>

> 9

>

> 10

>

> 11

>

> 12

>

>

>

>

> Sun

>

<file:///C:\Documents%20and%20Settings\ENagawkar\Desktop\KASMaster.xls#BAV!T

> 7#BAV!T7>

>

> 10

>

> 3

>

> 3

>

> 4

>

> 5

>

> 5

>

> 4

>

> 4

>

> 3

>

> 1

>

> 4

>

> 6

>

> 6

>

> 48

>

>

> Moon

>

<file:///C:\Documents%20and%20Settings\ENagawkar\Desktop\KASMaster.xls#BAV!A

> J7#BAV!AJ7>

>

> 2

>

> 4

>

> 6

>

> 4

>

> 4

>

> 4

>

> 4

>

> 6

>

> 5

>

> 3

>

> 4

>

> 2

>

> 3

>

> 49

>

>

> Mars

>

<file:///C:\Documents%20and%20Settings\ENagawkar\Desktop\KASMaster.xls#BAV!D

> 34#BAV!D34>

>

> 5

>

> 2

>

> 4

>

> 4

>

> 4

>

> 2

>

> 4

>

> 3

>

> 3

>

> 1

>

> 3

>

> 3

>

> 6

>

> 39

>

>

> Mercury

>

<file:///C:\Documents%20and%20Settings\ENagawkar\Desktop\KASMaster.xls#BAV!T

> 34#BAV!T34>

>

> 10

>

> 4

>

> 7

>

> 5

>

> 2

>

> 4

>

> 6

>

> 4

>

> 4

>

> 4

>

> 3

>

> 5

>

> 6

>

> 54

>

>

> Jupiter

>

<file:///C:\Documents%20and%20Settings\ENagawkar\Desktop\KASMaster.xls#BAV!A

> J34#BAV!AJ34>

>

> 7

>

> 4

>

> 4

>

> 5

>

> 4

>

> 4

>

> 6

>

> 5

>

> 7

>

> 4

>

> 5

>

> 4

>

> 4

>

> 56

>

>

> Venus

>

<file:///C:\Documents%20and%20Settings\ENagawkar\Desktop\KASMaster.xls#BAV!G

> 61#BAV!G61>

>

> 11

>

> 5

>

> 6

>

> 6

>

> 4

>

> 4

>

> 4

>

> 3

>

> 5

>

> 5

>

> 2

>

> 4

>

> 4

>

> 52

>

>

> Saturn

>

<file:///C:\Documents%20and%20Settings\ENagawkar\Desktop\KASMaster.xls#BAV!T

> 61#BAV!T61>

>

> 4

>

> 2

>

> 2

>

> 3

>

> 5

>

> 3

>

> 4

>

> 4

>

> 3

>

> 4

>

> 4

>

> 3

>

> 2

>

> 39

>

>

> Totals

>

>

>

> 24

>

> 32

>

> 31

>

> 28

>

> 26

>

> 32

>

> 29

>

> 30

>

> 22

>

> 25

>

> 27

>

> 31

>

> 337

>

>

>

>

>

> The points in 12th are more than 11th.

>

>

>

> In any case, let it be.

>

>

>

> Cheers !!!

>

> Ash -> <http://www.ashtro.ca>

http://www.ashtro.ca

>

> _____

>

>

>

On Behalf Of planck12

> Wednesday September 12, 2007 7:58 PM

>

> Re: Dear Ash et All :On the

Creation of

> Universe and Cosmology as applicable to

>

>

>

> Dear Ash,

> Yes, I completely concur and thats all I wanted to clarify from my

> end. Again before I leave I have another chart if anyone wants to use

> from educational stand point.

>

> 19 May 1986

> 12:10pm

> new delhi.

 

>

> Again i decided to relate the 11/12th house points, in this chart

> again the worksheet decided to give more points in 11th house than

> 12th. But the girl has no savings, he is quite spendrift and have

> numerous expenses as compared to her income.

>

> Also to double check other things, i decided to check other factors,

> her brillancy for that matter. I think she has two parts in saturn

> degrees as shown with the work sheet. But she is not very intelligent,

> again a decent girl who is quite jovial, but she has done a

> certificate course and works in a local bank. As I understand it from

> the notes if one part is in saturn then person has odinary

> intelligence and if two he/she has good intelligence. In her case she

> is normal like anyone else who has no part in saturns division.

>

> Feel free to check, incase there are other things required, as is

> always the case in terms of details.

>

> 1. The girl is unmarried

> 2. Wheatish complexion

> 3. works in a bank as teller

> 4. From a middle class family

> 5. Has good morals, but tends to be energetic and hyper at times

>

> regards

> Nicked Vish (Amit) I prefer Vish

>

> astrologyandtiminge

> <%40>

vents ,

> " Ash " <kas@> wrote:

> >

> > Dear Amit / Vishy (?),

> >

> >

> >

> > Everyone is entitled to their own opinion and All the more reason we

> should

> > get back to KAS :-)

> >

> > Cheers !!!

> >

> > Ash -> <http://www.ashtro.

<http://www.ashtro.ca> ca>

http://www.ashtro.

> <http://www.ashtro.ca> ca

> >

> > _____

> >

> > astrologyandtiminge

> <%40>

vents

> > [astrologyandtiminge

> <%40>

vents ]

> On Behalf Of

> astroquery12

> > Wednesday September 12, 2007 7:11 PM

> > astrologyandtiminge

> <%40>

vents

> > Dear Ash et All :On the

Creation of

> > Universe and Cosmology as applicable to Astr

> >

> >

> >

> > Hi,

> > Hope you are doing well. This is Amit again, had posted under a

> > different name prior but that account did not seem to work and had to

> > create a new id.

> >

> > I have been following the lessons for a while and again I see many

> > in-consistencies with the system. My intention is not to refute or

> > accept the system but purely to learn it and see it practicality and

> > in the process provide my thoughts in opinions (after all the

> > astrology forum is a free form for discussion). Some of my doubts

have

> > cropped up again with the usual, 11th house points vs 12th house

> > points and the actual condition of the charts (again this is only

> > treating the chart with KAS)as opposed to mixing parashra or k.p etc.

 

> >

> > On another note, perhaps I can take the liberty to explain again on

> > why this happens and hopefully you concur with my points and facts.

> > After all astrology will make more meaning if we understand it from

> > all angles. You are a computer scientist (a man of science) yourself

> > and perhaps this description will make sense and will take a purely

> > scientific approach to it:

> >

> > I am sure you are familiar at least on the basic level with

Einstein's

> > relativity and the other theory called Quantum Mechanics. During the

> > creation of the universe at the point of big bang it is widely

> > believed that there were four fundamental forces in the universe:

> > Gravity, electromagnetic, weak nuclear and strong nuclear. It is also

> > now very well accepted that relativity explains Gravity very

elegantly

> > and that the theory has been tested to the point of calculations

> > pertaning to perhilion of mercury (closest pass to the sun) with

> > accuracy. On the other hand Quantum mechanics has done well in

> > unifying the other three forces of the electromagnetic and nuclear

> > nature. BUT a BIG TWIST comes into the picture.

> >

> > Realivity claims that events (spacetime continum is 4D) are all

> > associated together and there is no concept of past and future or

> > present and in simple terms the destiney is already written and

> > nothing can change it, so given the right set of laws one can predict

> > the course of life and the cosmos (relativistic conditions on

> > cosmology)to a complete accurate picture based on fundametal field

> > equations of einstein. Again Einstein spent much of his life finding

a

> > Unified theory that would unify electromagnetics with gravity BUT

> FAILED.

> >

> > On the other hand QUANTUM MECHANICS claims that nothing in life is

> > predictable infact everything is a probability. And QM explains atoms

> > etc the world of sub atomic very well (this would include the brain)

> > the body etc, after all brain is essential a complex neural network

> > working on neurotransmitters signals which are electrical in nature.

> > So it is quite justified that QM is applicable to us as well since we

> > are made of atoms, eletrons etc. But the problem you run into with QM

> > is that nothing is certain and that everything is described as a

> > probablity wave function of something called the scrhorodingers

> > equation. I would want you to refer to the thought experiment termed

> > " Schroender's Cat " which is hard for me to explain on

this fourm but I

> > am sure you will take the initiative of reading it, in short every

> > observation made my an reference observer will change the course of

> > this obervation directly or indirectly depending on the observation

> > being made. Simply put, there is too much random ness existent in

this

> > universe to be able to describe anything in any accruancy, especially

> > when it comes to life or the atomic scale.

> >

> > Now applying the above theories to describe astrology, many of the

> > General predictions we make about the past or even the future at

times

> > happen to come true, yet there are many more predictions we made that

> > do not come true at all. Because we are juggling between certainity

> > and chaos and that is not the fault or positive aspect of anyone

> > astrological system but rather the law of nature (God if you may call

> > it). You have claimed in your past emails that KAS is very accurate

> > however on my sincere application of these principles I have found it

> > smiliar to any other system because the rate of predicition does not

> > change much as compared to prashara or k.p or jaimini for that

matter.

> >

> > It is however a different story if we only look at the positive

aspect

> > and not realise the shortcomings of any system. My approach is to

look

> > at the short comings of this system simply because it might help

> > improve the system in some other way (again thats not job). My sole

> > intention for this posting has been to again reiterate on a

scientific

> > ground the limitations of astrology and that of human mind and that

no

> > matter how hard we try we will be bound by many contraints. You might

> > claim that KAS predictions have come true, but I have applied basic

> > principles of many charts some of which have yielded results but

again

> > some of them have not yielded the correct results (this I see with an

> > open mind) leading me to believe and again affirm with the view that

> > astrology has limitations on what can be predicted. Any when we are

> > bound by such limitations then ethically we should take a more

> > cautious approach in predicting in the first place and perhaps a more

> > understanding, less materialistic (making money out of astrology)

> > attitude in researching things. This would also involve being open to

> > genuine thoughts weather pro or against any system in the betterment

> > of knowledge.

> >

> > To end it Einstein once said " God does not play dice with the

> > Universe " on seeing Quatum Mechanics back in the 30s he was

> > diasspointed with QM because he felt there was no free will and that

> > there was no such thing as probablity. A famous Quautum Theorist (I

> > will let you figure out who) responded by saying " Not only does

God

> > play dice with Us, He also puts it in places where we cannot find

it " .

> >

> > :) I hope you see this message not as a threat to your system but

> > rather as an open ended question to ponder on keeping aside

> > ego,predjuice or any other negative emotions.

> >

> > regards and Best

> > Amit

> >

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dear Harjeet,

 

:-)

 

Cheers !!!

Ash -> http://www.ashtro.ca

 

, " Ash " <kas wrote:

>

> Dear Harjeet,

>

>

>

> :-)

>

>

>

> Cheers !!!

>

> Ash -> <http://www.ashtro.ca> http://www.ashtro.ca

>

> _____

>

>

> On Behalf Of harjeet

> bakshi

> Thursday September 13, 2007 11:19 AM

>

> Re: Dear Ash et All :On the

Creation of

> Universe and Cosmology as applicable to

>

>

>

> Resp. Ashji,

> more over current antra of rahu samdhari to venus and mars.

> mars have more points for 12th compared to 11th.

> venus has 20 for 11th and 17 for 12th.

> rahu in 9th house triggers 12th and 4th house.

> so mars points in ws and rahu's position points to more expenditure in

> current antra.

> moreover antras of mars,saturn,moon,mercury and sun have less points

> in worsheet for 11th house compared to 12th.

> only jupiter and venus have a just little more points in 11th compared

> to 12th.

> plus the sav in 12th is more than 11th.

> dont we take mean of sav from sun,moon and lagna ?

> anything wrong in my thinking?

> thanks/regards

> harjeet

>

> astrologyandtiminge

> <%40>

vents ,

> " Ash " <kas@> wrote:

> >

> > Dear Amit,

> >

> >

> >

> > With this data u have given,

> >

> >

> >

> > 19th May 1986

> >

> > 12:10 PM

> >

> > New Delhi

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> > Planet

> >

> > Degrees

> >

> >

> > As

> >

> > 5 Le 38

> >

> >

> > Su

> >

> > 5 Ta 14

> >

> >

> > Mo

> >

> > 2 Vi 38

> >

> >

> > Ma

> >

> > 27 Sg 51

> >

> >

> > Me

> >

> > 0 Ta 39

> >

> >

> > Ju

> >

> > 25 Aq 40

> >

> >

> > Ve

> >

> > 4 Ge 28

> >

> >

> > SaR

> >

> > 14 Sc 17

> >

> >

> > Ra

> >

> > 5 Ar 44

> >

> >

> > Ke

> >

> > 5 Li 44

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> > House

> >

> > 1

> >

> > 2

> >

> > 3

> >

> > 4

> >

> > 5

> >

> > 6

> >

> > 7

> >

> > 8

> >

> > 9

> >

> > 10

> >

> > 11

> >

> > 12

> >

> >

> >

> >

> > Sun

> >

>

<file:///C:\Documents%20and%20Settings\ENagawkar\Desktop\KASMaster.xls#BAV!T

> > 7#BAV!T7>

> >

> > 10

> >

> > 3

> >

> > 3

> >

> > 4

> >

> > 5

> >

> > 5

> >

> > 4

> >

> > 4

> >

> > 3

> >

> > 1

> >

> > 4

> >

> > 6

> >

> > 6

> >

> > 48

> >

> >

> > Moon

> >

>

<file:///C:\Documents%20and%20Settings\ENagawkar\Desktop\KASMaster.xls#BAV!A

> > J7#BAV!AJ7>

> >

> > 2

> >

> > 4

> >

> > 6

> >

> > 4

> >

> > 4

> >

> > 4

> >

> > 4

> >

> > 6

> >

> > 5

> >

> > 3

> >

> > 4

> >

> > 2

> >

> > 3

> >

> > 49

> >

> >

> > Mars

> >

>

<file:///C:\Documents%20and%20Settings\ENagawkar\Desktop\KASMaster.xls#BAV!D

> > 34#BAV!D34>

> >

> > 5

> >

> > 2

> >

> > 4

> >

> > 4

> >

> > 4

> >

> > 2

> >

> > 4

> >

> > 3

> >

> > 3

> >

> > 1

> >

> > 3

> >

> > 3

> >

> > 6

> >

> > 39

> >

> >

> > Mercury

> >

>

<file:///C:\Documents%20and%20Settings\ENagawkar\Desktop\KASMaster.xls#BAV!T

> > 34#BAV!T34>

> >

> > 10

> >

> > 4

> >

> > 7

> >

> > 5

> >

> > 2

> >

> > 4

> >

> > 6

> >

> > 4

> >

> > 4

> >

> > 4

> >

> > 3

> >

> > 5

> >

> > 6

> >

> > 54

> >

> >

> > Jupiter

> >

>

<file:///C:\Documents%20and%20Settings\ENagawkar\Desktop\KASMaster.xls#BAV!A

> > J34#BAV!AJ34>

> >

> > 7

> >

> > 4

> >

> > 4

> >

> > 5

> >

> > 4

> >

> > 4

> >

> > 6

> >

> > 5

> >

> > 7

> >

> > 4

> >

> > 5

> >

> > 4

> >

> > 4

> >

> > 56

> >

> >

> > Venus

> >

>

<file:///C:\Documents%20and%20Settings\ENagawkar\Desktop\KASMaster.xls#BAV!G

> > 61#BAV!G61>

> >

> > 11

> >

> > 5

> >

> > 6

> >

> > 6

> >

> > 4

> >

> > 4

> >

> > 4

> >

> > 3

> >

> > 5

> >

> > 5

> >

> > 2

> >

> > 4

> >

> > 4

> >

> > 52

> >

> >

> > Saturn

> >

>

<file:///C:\Documents%20and%20Settings\ENagawkar\Desktop\KASMaster.xls#BAV!T

> > 61#BAV!T61>

> >

> > 4

> >

> > 2

> >

> > 2

> >

> > 3

> >

> > 5

> >

> > 3

> >

> > 4

> >

> > 4

> >

> > 3

> >

> > 4

> >

> > 4

> >

> > 3

> >

> > 2

> >

> > 39

> >

> >

> > Totals

> >

> >

> >

> > 24

> >

> > 32

> >

> > 31

> >

> > 28

> >

> > 26

> >

> > 32

> >

> > 29

> >

> > 30

> >

> > 22

> >

> > 25

> >

> > 27

> >

> > 31

> >

> > 337

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> > The points in 12th are more than 11th.

> >

> >

> >

> > In any case, let it be.

> >

> >

> >

> > Cheers !!!

> >

> > Ash -> <http://www.ashtro. <http://www.ashtro.ca> ca>

http://www.ashtro.

> <http://www.ashtro.ca> ca

> >

> > _____

> >

> > astrologyandtiminge

> <%40>

vents

> > [astrologyandtiminge

> <%40>

vents ]

> On Behalf Of planck12

> > Wednesday September 12, 2007 7:58 PM

> > astrologyandtiminge

> <%40>

vents

> > Re: Dear Ash et All :On the

> Creation of

> > Universe and Cosmology as applicable to

> >

> >

> >

> > Dear Ash,

> > Yes, I completely concur and thats all I wanted to clarify from my

> > end. Again before I leave I have another chart if anyone wants to use

> > from educational stand point.

> >

> > 19 May 1986

> > 12:10pm

> > new delhi.

> >

> > Again i decided to relate the 11/12th house points, in this chart

> > again the worksheet decided to give more points in 11th house than

> > 12th. But the girl has no savings, he is quite spendrift and have

> > numerous expenses as compared to her income.

> >

> > Also to double check other things, i decided to check other factors,

> > her brillancy for that matter. I think she has two parts in saturn

> > degrees as shown with the work sheet. But she is not very intelligent,

> > again a decent girl who is quite jovial, but she has done a

> > certificate course and works in a local bank. As I understand it from

> > the notes if one part is in saturn then person has odinary

> > intelligence and if two he/she has good intelligence. In her case she

> > is normal like anyone else who has no part in saturns division.

> >

> > Feel free to check, incase there are other things required, as is

> > always the case in terms of details.

> >

> > 1. The girl is unmarried

> > 2. Wheatish complexion

> > 3. works in a bank as teller

> > 4. From a middle class family

> > 5. Has good morals, but tends to be energetic and hyper at times

> >

> > regards

> > Nicked Vish (Amit) I prefer Vish

> >

> > astrologyandtiminge

> > <%40>

> vents (AT) (DOT) <vents%40> com,

> > " Ash " <kas@> wrote:

> > >

> > > Dear Amit / Vishy (?),

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > > Everyone is entitled to their own opinion and All the more reason we

> > should

> > > get back to KAS :-)

> > >

> > > Cheers !!!

> > >

> > > Ash -> <http://www.ashtro. <http://www.ashtro.

<http://www.ashtro.ca>

> ca> ca>

> http://www.ashtro.

> > <http://www.ashtro. <http://www.ashtro.ca> ca> ca

> > >

> > > _____

> > >

> > > astrologyandtiminge

> > <%40>

> vents (AT) (DOT) <vents%40> com

> > > [astrologyandtiminge

> > <%40>

> vents (AT) (DOT) <vents%40> com]

> > On Behalf Of

> > astroquery12

> > > Wednesday September 12, 2007 7:11 PM

> > > astrologyandtiminge

> > <%40>

> vents (AT) (DOT) <vents%40> com

> > > Dear Ash et All :On the

> Creation of

> > > Universe and Cosmology as applicable to Astr

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > > Hi,

> > > Hope you are doing well. This is Amit again, had posted under a

> > > different name prior but that account did not seem to work and

had to

> > > create a new id.

> > >

> > > I have been following the lessons for a while and again I see many

> > > in-consistencies with the system. My intention is not to refute or

> > > accept the system but purely to learn it and see it practicality and

> > > in the process provide my thoughts in opinions (after all the

> > > astrology forum is a free form for discussion). Some of my

doubts have

> > > cropped up again with the usual, 11th house points vs 12th house

> > > points and the actual condition of the charts (again this is only

> > > treating the chart with KAS)as opposed to mixing parashra or k.p

etc.

> > >

> > > On another note, perhaps I can take the liberty to explain again on

> > > why this happens and hopefully you concur with my points and facts.

> > > After all astrology will make more meaning if we understand it from

> > > all angles. You are a computer scientist (a man of science) yourself

> > > and perhaps this description will make sense and will take a purely

> > > scientific approach to it:

> > >

> > > I am sure you are familiar at least on the basic level with

Einstein's

> > > relativity and the other theory called Quantum Mechanics. During the

> > > creation of the universe at the point of big bang it is widely

> > > believed that there were four fundamental forces in the universe:

> > > Gravity, electromagnetic, weak nuclear and strong nuclear. It is

also

> > > now very well accepted that relativity explains Gravity very

elegantly

> > > and that the theory has been tested to the point of calculations

> > > pertaning to perhilion of mercury (closest pass to the sun) with

> > > accuracy. On the other hand Quantum mechanics has done well in

> > > unifying the other three forces of the electromagnetic and nuclear

> > > nature. BUT a BIG TWIST comes into the picture.

> > >

> > > Realivity claims that events (spacetime continum is 4D) are all

> > > associated together and there is no concept of past and future or

> > > present and in simple terms the destiney is already written and

> > > nothing can change it, so given the right set of laws one can

predict

> > > the course of life and the cosmos (relativistic conditions on

> > > cosmology)to a complete accurate picture based on fundametal field

> > > equations of einstein. Again Einstein spent much of his life

finding a

> > > Unified theory that would unify electromagnetics with gravity BUT

> > FAILED.

> > >

> > > On the other hand QUANTUM MECHANICS claims that nothing in life is

> > > predictable infact everything is a probability. And QM explains

atoms

> > > etc the world of sub atomic very well (this would include the brain)

> > > the body etc, after all brain is essential a complex neural network

> > > working on neurotransmitters signals which are electrical in

nature.

> > > So it is quite justified that QM is applicable to us as well

since we

> > > are made of atoms, eletrons etc. But the problem you run into

with QM

> > > is that nothing is certain and that everything is described as a

> > > probablity wave function of something called the scrhorodingers

> > > equation. I would want you to refer to the thought experiment termed

> > > " Schroender's Cat " which is hard for me to explain on this fourm

but I

> > > am sure you will take the initiative of reading it, in short every

> > > observation made my an reference observer will change the course of

> > > this obervation directly or indirectly depending on the observation

> > > being made. Simply put, there is too much random ness existent

in this

> > > universe to be able to describe anything in any accruancy,

especially

> > > when it comes to life or the atomic scale.

> > >

> > > Now applying the above theories to describe astrology, many of the

> > > General predictions we make about the past or even the future at

times

> > > happen to come true, yet there are many more predictions we made

that

> > > do not come true at all. Because we are juggling between certainity

> > > and chaos and that is not the fault or positive aspect of anyone

> > > astrological system but rather the law of nature (God if you may

call

> > > it). You have claimed in your past emails that KAS is very accurate

> > > however on my sincere application of these principles I have

found it

> > > smiliar to any other system because the rate of predicition does not

> > > change much as compared to prashara or k.p or jaimini for that

> matter.

> > >

> > > It is however a different story if we only look at the positive

aspect

> > > and not realise the shortcomings of any system. My approach is

to look

> > > at the short comings of this system simply because it might help

> > > improve the system in some other way (again thats not job). My sole

> > > intention for this posting has been to again reiterate on a

scientific

> > > ground the limitations of astrology and that of human mind and

that no

> > > matter how hard we try we will be bound by many contraints. You

might

> > > claim that KAS predictions have come true, but I have applied basic

> > > principles of many charts some of which have yielded results but

again

> > > some of them have not yielded the correct results (this I see

with an

> > > open mind) leading me to believe and again affirm with the view that

> > > astrology has limitations on what can be predicted. Any when we are

> > > bound by such limitations then ethically we should take a more

> > > cautious approach in predicting in the first place and perhaps a

more

> > > understanding, less materialistic (making money out of astrology)

> > > attitude in researching things. This would also involve being

open to

> > > genuine thoughts weather pro or against any system in the betterment

> > > of knowledge.

> > >

> > > To end it Einstein once said " God does not play dice with the

> > > Universe " on seeing Quatum Mechanics back in the 30s he was

> > > diasspointed with QM because he felt there was no free will and that

> > > there was no such thing as probablity. A famous Quautum Theorist (I

> > > will let you figure out who) responded by saying " Not only does God

> > > play dice with Us, He also puts it in places where we cannot find

> it " .

> > >

> > > :) I hope you see this message not as a threat to your system but

> > > rather as an open ended question to ponder on keeping aside

> > > ego,predjuice or any other negative emotions.

> > >

> > > regards and Best

> > > Amit

> > >

> >

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dear Ashji,

whenever one of my teacher used to give me smile.. i used to do

something wrong in solving a problem... but she would not tell me till

i asked her.

so did i do something wrong?

thanks/regards

harjeet

 

, " ashsam73 " <kas

wrote:

>

> Dear Harjeet,

>

> :-)

>

> Cheers !!!

> Ash -> http://www.ashtro.ca

>

> , " Ash " <kas@> wrote:

> >

> > Dear Harjeet,

> >

> >

> >

> > :-)

> >

> >

> >

> > Cheers !!!

> >

> > Ash -> <http://www.ashtro.ca> http://www.ashtro.ca

> >

> > _____

> >

> >

> > On Behalf Of harjeet

> > bakshi

> > Thursday September 13, 2007 11:19 AM

> >

> > Re: Dear Ash et All :On the

> Creation of

> > Universe and Cosmology as applicable to

> >

> >

> >

> > Resp. Ashji,

> > more over current antra of rahu samdhari to venus and mars.

> > mars have more points for 12th compared to 11th.

> > venus has 20 for 11th and 17 for 12th.

> > rahu in 9th house triggers 12th and 4th house.

> > so mars points in ws and rahu's position points to more expenditure in

> > current antra.

> > moreover antras of mars,saturn,moon,mercury and sun have less points

> > in worsheet for 11th house compared to 12th.

> > only jupiter and venus have a just little more points in 11th compared

> > to 12th.

> > plus the sav in 12th is more than 11th.

> > dont we take mean of sav from sun,moon and lagna ?

> > anything wrong in my thinking?

> > thanks/regards

> > harjeet

> >

> > astrologyandtiminge

> > <%40>

> vents ,

> > " Ash " <kas@> wrote:

> > >

> > > Dear Amit,

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > > With this data u have given,

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > > 19th May 1986

> > >

> > > 12:10 PM

> > >

> > > New Delhi

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > > Planet

> > >

> > > Degrees

> > >

> > >

> > > As

> > >

> > > 5 Le 38

> > >

> > >

> > > Su

> > >

> > > 5 Ta 14

> > >

> > >

> > > Mo

> > >

> > > 2 Vi 38

> > >

> > >

> > > Ma

> > >

> > > 27 Sg 51

> > >

> > >

> > > Me

> > >

> > > 0 Ta 39

> > >

> > >

> > > Ju

> > >

> > > 25 Aq 40

> > >

> > >

> > > Ve

> > >

> > > 4 Ge 28

> > >

> > >

> > > SaR

> > >

> > > 14 Sc 17

> > >

> > >

> > > Ra

> > >

> > > 5 Ar 44

> > >

> > >

> > > Ke

> > >

> > > 5 Li 44

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > > House

> > >

> > > 1

> > >

> > > 2

> > >

> > > 3

> > >

> > > 4

> > >

> > > 5

> > >

> > > 6

> > >

> > > 7

> > >

> > > 8

> > >

> > > 9

> > >

> > > 10

> > >

> > > 11

> > >

> > > 12

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > > Sun

> > >

> >

>

<file:///C:\Documents%20and%20Settings\ENagawkar\Desktop\KASMaster.xls#BAV!T

> > > 7#BAV!T7>

> > >

> > > 10

> > >

> > > 3

> > >

> > > 3

> > >

> > > 4

> > >

> > > 5

> > >

> > > 5

> > >

> > > 4

> > >

> > > 4

> > >

> > > 3

> > >

> > > 1

> > >

> > > 4

> > >

> > > 6

> > >

> > > 6

> > >

> > > 48

> > >

> > >

> > > Moon

> > >

> >

>

<file:///C:\Documents%20and%20Settings\ENagawkar\Desktop\KASMaster.xls#BAV!A

> > > J7#BAV!AJ7>

> > >

> > > 2

> > >

> > > 4

> > >

> > > 6

> > >

> > > 4

> > >

> > > 4

> > >

> > > 4

> > >

> > > 4

> > >

> > > 6

> > >

> > > 5

> > >

> > > 3

> > >

> > > 4

> > >

> > > 2

> > >

> > > 3

> > >

> > > 49

> > >

> > >

> > > Mars

> > >

> >

>

<file:///C:\Documents%20and%20Settings\ENagawkar\Desktop\KASMaster.xls#BAV!D

> > > 34#BAV!D34>

> > >

> > > 5

> > >

> > > 2

> > >

> > > 4

> > >

> > > 4

> > >

> > > 4

> > >

> > > 2

> > >

> > > 4

> > >

> > > 3

> > >

> > > 3

> > >

> > > 1

> > >

> > > 3

> > >

> > > 3

> > >

> > > 6

> > >

> > > 39

> > >

> > >

> > > Mercury

> > >

> >

>

<file:///C:\Documents%20and%20Settings\ENagawkar\Desktop\KASMaster.xls#BAV!T

> > > 34#BAV!T34>

> > >

> > > 10

> > >

> > > 4

> > >

> > > 7

> > >

> > > 5

> > >

> > > 2

> > >

> > > 4

> > >

> > > 6

> > >

> > > 4

> > >

> > > 4

> > >

> > > 4

> > >

> > > 3

> > >

> > > 5

> > >

> > > 6

> > >

> > > 54

> > >

> > >

> > > Jupiter

> > >

> >

>

<file:///C:\Documents%20and%20Settings\ENagawkar\Desktop\KASMaster.xls#BAV!A

> > > J34#BAV!AJ34>

> > >

> > > 7

> > >

> > > 4

> > >

> > > 4

> > >

> > > 5

> > >

> > > 4

> > >

> > > 4

> > >

> > > 6

> > >

> > > 5

> > >

> > > 7

> > >

> > > 4

> > >

> > > 5

> > >

> > > 4

> > >

> > > 4

> > >

> > > 56

> > >

> > >

> > > Venus

> > >

> >

>

<file:///C:\Documents%20and%20Settings\ENagawkar\Desktop\KASMaster.xls#BAV!G

> > > 61#BAV!G61>

> > >

> > > 11

> > >

> > > 5

> > >

> > > 6

> > >

> > > 6

> > >

> > > 4

> > >

> > > 4

> > >

> > > 4

> > >

> > > 3

> > >

> > > 5

> > >

> > > 5

> > >

> > > 2

> > >

> > > 4

> > >

> > > 4

> > >

> > > 52

> > >

> > >

> > > Saturn

> > >

> >

>

<file:///C:\Documents%20and%20Settings\ENagawkar\Desktop\KASMaster.xls#BAV!T

> > > 61#BAV!T61>

> > >

> > > 4

> > >

> > > 2

> > >

> > > 2

> > >

> > > 3

> > >

> > > 5

> > >

> > > 3

> > >

> > > 4

> > >

> > > 4

> > >

> > > 3

> > >

> > > 4

> > >

> > > 4

> > >

> > > 3

> > >

> > > 2

> > >

> > > 39

> > >

> > >

> > > Totals

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > > 24

> > >

> > > 32

> > >

> > > 31

> > >

> > > 28

> > >

> > > 26

> > >

> > > 32

> > >

> > > 29

> > >

> > > 30

> > >

> > > 22

> > >

> > > 25

> > >

> > > 27

> > >

> > > 31

> > >

> > > 337

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > > The points in 12th are more than 11th.

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > > In any case, let it be.

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > > Cheers !!!

> > >

> > > Ash -> <http://www.ashtro. <http://www.ashtro.ca> ca>

> http://www.ashtro.

> > <http://www.ashtro.ca> ca

> > >

> > > _____

> > >

> > > astrologyandtiminge

> > <%40>

> vents

> > > [astrologyandtiminge

> > <%40>

> vents ]

> > On Behalf Of planck12

> > > Wednesday September 12, 2007 7:58 PM

> > > astrologyandtiminge

> > <%40>

> vents

> > > Re: Dear Ash et All :On the

> > Creation of

> > > Universe and Cosmology as applicable to

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > > Dear Ash,

> > > Yes, I completely concur and thats all I wanted to clarify from my

> > > end. Again before I leave I have another chart if anyone wants

to use

> > > from educational stand point.

> > >

> > > 19 May 1986

> > > 12:10pm

> > > new delhi.

> > >

> > > Again i decided to relate the 11/12th house points, in this chart

> > > again the worksheet decided to give more points in 11th house than

> > > 12th. But the girl has no savings, he is quite spendrift and have

> > > numerous expenses as compared to her income.

> > >

> > > Also to double check other things, i decided to check other factors,

> > > her brillancy for that matter. I think she has two parts in saturn

> > > degrees as shown with the work sheet. But she is not very

intelligent,

> > > again a decent girl who is quite jovial, but she has done a

> > > certificate course and works in a local bank. As I understand it

from

> > > the notes if one part is in saturn then person has odinary

> > > intelligence and if two he/she has good intelligence. In her

case she

> > > is normal like anyone else who has no part in saturns division.

> > >

> > > Feel free to check, incase there are other things required, as is

> > > always the case in terms of details.

> > >

> > > 1. The girl is unmarried

> > > 2. Wheatish complexion

> > > 3. works in a bank as teller

> > > 4. From a middle class family

> > > 5. Has good morals, but tends to be energetic and hyper at times

> > >

> > > regards

> > > Nicked Vish (Amit) I prefer Vish

> > >

> > > astrologyandtiminge

> > > <%40>

> > vents (AT) (DOT) <vents%40> com,

> > > " Ash " <kas@> wrote:

> > > >

> > > > Dear Amit / Vishy (?),

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > Everyone is entitled to their own opinion and All the more

reason we

> > > should

> > > > get back to KAS :-)

> > > >

> > > > Cheers !!!

> > > >

> > > > Ash -> <http://www.ashtro. <http://www.ashtro.

> <http://www.ashtro.ca>

> > ca> ca>

> > http://www.ashtro.

> > > <http://www.ashtro. <http://www.ashtro.ca> ca> ca

> > > >

> > > > _____

> > > >

> > > > astrologyandtiminge

> > > <%40>

> > vents (AT) (DOT) <vents%40> com

> > > > [astrologyandtiminge

> > > <%40>

> > vents (AT) (DOT) <vents%40> com]

> > > On Behalf Of

> > > astroquery12

> > > > Wednesday September 12, 2007 7:11 PM

> > > > astrologyandtiminge

> > > <%40>

> > vents (AT) (DOT) <vents%40> com

> > > > Dear Ash et All :On the

> > Creation of

> > > > Universe and Cosmology as applicable to Astr

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > Hi,

> > > > Hope you are doing well. This is Amit again, had posted under a

> > > > different name prior but that account did not seem to work and

> had to

> > > > create a new id.

> > > >

> > > > I have been following the lessons for a while and again I see many

> > > > in-consistencies with the system. My intention is not to refute or

> > > > accept the system but purely to learn it and see it

practicality and

> > > > in the process provide my thoughts in opinions (after all the

> > > > astrology forum is a free form for discussion). Some of my

> doubts have

> > > > cropped up again with the usual, 11th house points vs 12th house

> > > > points and the actual condition of the charts (again this is only

> > > > treating the chart with KAS)as opposed to mixing parashra or k.p

> etc.

> > > >

> > > > On another note, perhaps I can take the liberty to explain

again on

> > > > why this happens and hopefully you concur with my points and

facts.

> > > > After all astrology will make more meaning if we understand it

from

> > > > all angles. You are a computer scientist (a man of science)

yourself

> > > > and perhaps this description will make sense and will take a

purely

> > > > scientific approach to it:

> > > >

> > > > I am sure you are familiar at least on the basic level with

> Einstein's

> > > > relativity and the other theory called Quantum Mechanics.

During the

> > > > creation of the universe at the point of big bang it is widely

> > > > believed that there were four fundamental forces in the universe:

> > > > Gravity, electromagnetic, weak nuclear and strong nuclear. It is

> also

> > > > now very well accepted that relativity explains Gravity very

> elegantly

> > > > and that the theory has been tested to the point of calculations

> > > > pertaning to perhilion of mercury (closest pass to the sun) with

> > > > accuracy. On the other hand Quantum mechanics has done well in

> > > > unifying the other three forces of the electromagnetic and nuclear

> > > > nature. BUT a BIG TWIST comes into the picture.

> > > >

> > > > Realivity claims that events (spacetime continum is 4D) are all

> > > > associated together and there is no concept of past and future or

> > > > present and in simple terms the destiney is already written and

> > > > nothing can change it, so given the right set of laws one can

> predict

> > > > the course of life and the cosmos (relativistic conditions on

> > > > cosmology)to a complete accurate picture based on fundametal field

> > > > equations of einstein. Again Einstein spent much of his life

> finding a

> > > > Unified theory that would unify electromagnetics with gravity BUT

> > > FAILED.

> > > >

> > > > On the other hand QUANTUM MECHANICS claims that nothing in life is

> > > > predictable infact everything is a probability. And QM explains

> atoms

> > > > etc the world of sub atomic very well (this would include the

brain)

> > > > the body etc, after all brain is essential a complex neural

network

> > > > working on neurotransmitters signals which are electrical in

> nature.

> > > > So it is quite justified that QM is applicable to us as well

> since we

> > > > are made of atoms, eletrons etc. But the problem you run into

> with QM

> > > > is that nothing is certain and that everything is described as a

> > > > probablity wave function of something called the scrhorodingers

> > > > equation. I would want you to refer to the thought experiment

termed

> > > > " Schroender's Cat " which is hard for me to explain on this fourm

> but I

> > > > am sure you will take the initiative of reading it, in short every

> > > > observation made my an reference observer will change the

course of

> > > > this obervation directly or indirectly depending on the

observation

> > > > being made. Simply put, there is too much random ness existent

> in this

> > > > universe to be able to describe anything in any accruancy,

> especially

> > > > when it comes to life or the atomic scale.

> > > >

> > > > Now applying the above theories to describe astrology, many of the

> > > > General predictions we make about the past or even the future at

> times

> > > > happen to come true, yet there are many more predictions we made

> that

> > > > do not come true at all. Because we are juggling between

certainity

> > > > and chaos and that is not the fault or positive aspect of anyone

> > > > astrological system but rather the law of nature (God if you may

> call

> > > > it). You have claimed in your past emails that KAS is very

accurate

> > > > however on my sincere application of these principles I have

> found it

> > > > smiliar to any other system because the rate of predicition

does not

> > > > change much as compared to prashara or k.p or jaimini for that

> > matter.

> > > >

> > > > It is however a different story if we only look at the positive

> aspect

> > > > and not realise the shortcomings of any system. My approach is

> to look

> > > > at the short comings of this system simply because it might help

> > > > improve the system in some other way (again thats not job). My

sole

> > > > intention for this posting has been to again reiterate on a

> scientific

> > > > ground the limitations of astrology and that of human mind and

> that no

> > > > matter how hard we try we will be bound by many contraints. You

> might

> > > > claim that KAS predictions have come true, but I have applied

basic

> > > > principles of many charts some of which have yielded results but

> again

> > > > some of them have not yielded the correct results (this I see

> with an

> > > > open mind) leading me to believe and again affirm with the

view that

> > > > astrology has limitations on what can be predicted. Any when

we are

> > > > bound by such limitations then ethically we should take a more

> > > > cautious approach in predicting in the first place and perhaps a

> more

> > > > understanding, less materialistic (making money out of astrology)

> > > > attitude in researching things. This would also involve being

> open to

> > > > genuine thoughts weather pro or against any system in the

betterment

> > > > of knowledge.

> > > >

> > > > To end it Einstein once said " God does not play dice with the

> > > > Universe " on seeing Quatum Mechanics back in the 30s he was

> > > > diasspointed with QM because he felt there was no free will

and that

> > > > there was no such thing as probablity. A famous Quautum

Theorist (I

> > > > will let you figure out who) responded by saying " Not only

does God

> > > > play dice with Us, He also puts it in places where we cannot find

> > it " .

> > > >

> > > > :) I hope you see this message not as a threat to your system but

> > > > rather as an open ended question to ponder on keeping aside

> > > > ego,predjuice or any other negative emotions.

> > > >

> > > > regards and Best

> > > > Amit

> > > >

> > >

> >

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dear Harjeet , "us shehar mein jao,to itna use kehna,baqi na sune koi, sirf tanha usay kehna,kuch log safar kay liye mozo'n (suitable) nahi hotay,kuch raaste kate nahi tanha,itna use kehna" Now tell me,how the quality of a marriage will be, if there is no zero in SAV by any planet and three zero in navamsa :) and What about such case...denial or delay of marriage?? Regards Anup harjeet bakshi <harjeet_bakshi wrote: Dear Ashji,whenever one of my teacher used to give me smile.. i used to dosomething wrong in solving a problem... but she would not tell me tilli asked her.so did i do something wrong?thanks/regardsharjeet , "ashsam73" <kaswrote:>> Dear Harjeet,> > :-)> > Cheers !!!> Ash -> http://www.ashtro.ca> > , "Ash" <kas@> wrote:> >> > Dear Harjeet,> > > > > > > > :-) > > > > > > > > Cheers !!!> > > > Ash -> <http://www.ashtro.ca> http://www.ashtro.ca> > > > _____ > > > > > > On Behalf Of harjeet> > bakshi> > Thursday September 13, 2007 11:19 AM> > > > Re: Dear Ash et All :On the> Creation of> > Universe and Cosmology as applicable to> > > > > > > > Resp. Ashji,> > more over current antra of rahu samdhari to venus and mars.> > mars have more points for 12th compared to 11th.> > venus has 20 for 11th and 17 for 12th.> > rahu in 9th house triggers 12th and 4th house.> > so mars points in ws and rahu's position points to more expenditure in> > current antra.> > moreover antras of mars,saturn,moon,mercury and sun have less points> > in worsheet for 11th house compared to 12th.> > only jupiter and venus have a just little more points in 11th compared> > to 12th.> > plus the sav in 12th is more

than 11th.> > dont we take mean of sav from sun,moon and lagna ?> > anything wrong in my thinking?> > thanks/regards> > harjeet> > > > astrologyandtiminge> > <%40>> vents ,> > "Ash" <kas@> wrote:> > >> > > Dear Amit,> > > > > > > > > > > > With this data u have given,> > > > > > > > > > > > 19th May 1986> > > > > > 12:10 PM> > > > > > New Delhi> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Planet> > > > > > Degrees> > > > > >

> > > As> > > > > > 5 Le 38> > > > > > > > > Su> > > > > > 5 Ta 14> > > > > > > > > Mo> > > > > > 2 Vi 38> > > > > > > > > Ma> > > > > > 27 Sg 51> > > > > > > > > Me> > > > > > 0 Ta 39> > > > > > > > > Ju> > > > > > 25 Aq 40> > > > > > > > > Ve> > > > > > 4 Ge 28> > > > > > > > > SaR> > > > > > 14 Sc 17> > > > > > > > > Ra> > > > > > 5 Ar 44> > > > > > > > > Ke> > >

> > > 5 Li 44> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > House> > > > > > 1> > > > > > 2> > > > > > 3> > > > > > 4> > > > > > 5> > > > > > 6> > > > > > 7> > > > > > 8> > > > > > 9> > > > > > 10> > > > > > 11> > > > > > 12> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Sun> > >> >><file:///C:\Documents%20and%20Settings\ENagawkar\Desktop\KASMaster.xls#BAV!T> > > 7#BAV!T7> >

> > > > > 10> > > > > > 3> > > > > > 3> > > > > > 4> > > > > > 5> > > > > > 5> > > > > > 4> > > > > > 4> > > > > > 3> > > > > > 1> > > > > > 4> > > > > > 6> > > > > > 6> > > > > > 48> > > > > > > > > Moon> > >> >><file:///C:\Documents%20and%20Settings\ENagawkar\Desktop\KASMaster.xls#BAV!A> > > J7#BAV!AJ7> > > > > > > 2> > > > > > 4> > > > > > 6> > > > > > 4> > >

> > > 4> > > > > > 4> > > > > > 4> > > > > > 6> > > > > > 5> > > > > > 3> > > > > > 4> > > > > > 2> > > > > > 3> > > > > > 49> > > > > > > > > Mars> > >> >><file:///C:\Documents%20and%20Settings\ENagawkar\Desktop\KASMaster.xls#BAV!D> > > 34#BAV!D34> > > > > > > 5> > > > > > 2> > > > > > 4> > > > > > 4> > > > > > 4> > > > > > 2> > > > > > 4> > > > > > 3> > > > >

> 3> > > > > > 1> > > > > > 3> > > > > > 3> > > > > > 6> > > > > > 39> > > > > > > > > Mercury> > >> >><file:///C:\Documents%20and%20Settings\ENagawkar\Desktop\KASMaster.xls#BAV!T> > > 34#BAV!T34> > > > > > > 10> > > > > > 4> > > > > > 7> > > > > > 5> > > > > > 2> > > > > > 4> > > > > > 6> > > > > > 4> > > > > > 4> > > > > > 4> > > > > > 3> > > > > > 5> > > > > >

6> > > > > > 54> > > > > > > > > Jupiter> > >> >><file:///C:\Documents%20and%20Settings\ENagawkar\Desktop\KASMaster.xls#BAV!A> > > J34#BAV!AJ34> > > > > > > 7> > > > > > 4> > > > > > 4> > > > > > 5> > > > > > 4> > > > > > 4> > > > > > 6> > > > > > 5> > > > > > 7> > > > > > 4> > > > > > 5> > > > > > 4> > > > > > 4> > > > > > 56> > > > > > > > > Venus> > >> >><file:///C:\Documents%20and%20Settings\ENagawkar\Desktop\KASMaster.xls#BAV!G> > > 61#BAV!G61> > > > > > > 11> > > > > > 5> > > > > > 6> > > > > > 6> > > > > > 4> > > > > > 4> > > > > > 4> > > > > > 3> > > > > > 5> > > > > > 5> > > > > > 2> > > > > > 4> > > > > > 4> > > > > > 52> > > > > > > > > Saturn> > >> >><file:///C:\Documents%20and%20Settings\ENagawkar\Desktop\KASMaster.xls#BAV!T> > > 61#BAV!T61> > >

> > > > 4> > > > > > 2> > > > > > 2> > > > > > 3> > > > > > 5> > > > > > 3> > > > > > 4> > > > > > 4> > > > > > 3> > > > > > 4> > > > > > 4> > > > > > 3> > > > > > 2> > > > > > 39> > > > > > > > > Totals> > > > > > > > > > > > 24> > > > > > 32> > > > > > 31> > > > > > 28> > > > > > 26> > > > > > 32> > > > > > 29> > > > > > 30> > > > >

> 22> > > > > > 25> > > > > > 27> > > > > > 31> > > > > > 337> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The points in 12th are more than 11th.> > > > > > > > > > > > In any case, let it be.> > > > > > > > > > > > Cheers !!!> > > > > > Ash -> <http://www.ashtro. <http://www.ashtro.ca> ca>> http://www.ashtro.> > <http://www.ashtro.ca> ca> > > > > > _____ > > > > > > astrologyandtiminge> >

<%40>> vents > > > [astrologyandtiminge> > <%40>> vents ]> > On Behalf Of planck12> > > Wednesday September 12, 2007 7:58 PM> > > astrologyandtiminge> > <%40>> vents > > > Re: Dear Ash et All :On the> > Creation of> > > Universe and Cosmology as applicable to> > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Ash, > > > Yes, I completely concur and thats all

I wanted to clarify from my> > > end. Again before I leave I have another chart if anyone wantsto use> > > from educational stand point. > > > > > > 19 May 1986> > > 12:10pm > > > new delhi. > > > > > > Again i decided to relate the 11/12th house points, in this chart> > > again the worksheet decided to give more points in 11th house than> > > 12th. But the girl has no savings, he is quite spendrift and have> > > numerous expenses as compared to her income. > > > > > > Also to double check other things, i decided to check other factors,> > > her brillancy for that matter. I think she has two parts in saturn> > > degrees as shown with the work sheet. But she is not veryintelligent,> > > again a decent girl who is quite jovial, but she has done a> >

> certificate course and works in a local bank. As I understand itfrom> > > the notes if one part is in saturn then person has odinary> > > intelligence and if two he/she has good intelligence. In hercase she> > > is normal like anyone else who has no part in saturns division. > > > > > > Feel free to check, incase there are other things required, as is> > > always the case in terms of details. > > > > > > 1. The girl is unmarried> > > 2. Wheatish complexion > > > 3. works in a bank as teller > > > 4. From a middle class family> > > 5. Has good morals, but tends to be energetic and hyper at times > > > > > > regards> > > Nicked Vish (Amit) I prefer Vish > > > > > > astrologyandtiminge> > >

<%40>> > vents (AT) (DOT) <vents%40> com,> > > "Ash" <kas@> wrote:> > > >> > > > Dear Amit / Vishy (?),> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Everyone is entitled to their own opinion and All the morereason we> > > should> > > > get back to KAS :-)> > > > > > > > Cheers !!!> > > > > > > > Ash -> <http://www.ashtro. <http://www.ashtro.> <http://www.ashtro.ca>> > ca> ca>> > http://www.ashtro.> > > <http://www.ashtro.

<http://www.ashtro.ca> ca> ca> > > > > > > > _____ > > > > > > > > astrologyandtiminge> > > <%40>> > vents (AT) (DOT) <vents%40> com> > > > [astrologyandtiminge> > > <%40>> > vents (AT) (DOT) <vents%40> com]> > > On Behalf Of> > > astroquery12> > > > Wednesday September 12, 2007 7:11 PM> > > > astrologyandtiminge> > > <%40>> > vents (AT) (DOT) <vents%40> com> > >

> Dear Ash et All :On the> > Creation of> > > > Universe and Cosmology as applicable to Astr> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > Hope you are doing well. This is Amit again, had posted under a> > > > different name prior but that account did not seem to work and> had to> > > > create a new id. > > > > > > > > I have been following the lessons for a while and again I see many> > > > in-consistencies with the system. My intention is not to refute or> > > > accept the system but purely to learn it and see itpracticality and> > > > in the process provide my thoughts in opinions (after all the> > > > astrology forum is a free form for discussion). Some of my> doubts have>

> > > cropped up again with the usual, 11th house points vs 12th house> > > > points and the actual condition of the charts (again this is only> > > > treating the chart with KAS)as opposed to mixing parashra or k.p> etc. > > > > > > > > On another note, perhaps I can take the liberty to explainagain on> > > > why this happens and hopefully you concur with my points andfacts.> > > > After all astrology will make more meaning if we understand itfrom> > > > all angles. You are a computer scientist (a man of science)yourself> > > > and perhaps this description will make sense and will take apurely> > > > scientific approach to it: > > > > > > > > I am sure you are familiar at least on the basic level with> Einstein's> > > > relativity and the

other theory called Quantum Mechanics.During the> > > > creation of the universe at the point of big bang it is widely> > > > believed that there were four fundamental forces in the universe:> > > > Gravity, electromagnetic, weak nuclear and strong nuclear. It is> also> > > > now very well accepted that relativity explains Gravity very> elegantly> > > > and that the theory has been tested to the point of calculations> > > > pertaning to perhilion of mercury (closest pass to the sun) with> > > > accuracy. On the other hand Quantum mechanics has done well in> > > > unifying the other three forces of the electromagnetic and nuclear> > > > nature. BUT a BIG TWIST comes into the picture. > > > > > > > > Realivity claims that events (spacetime continum is 4D) are all> > >

> associated together and there is no concept of past and future or> > > > present and in simple terms the destiney is already written and> > > > nothing can change it, so given the right set of laws one can> predict> > > > the course of life and the cosmos (relativistic conditions on> > > > cosmology)to a complete accurate picture based on fundametal field> > > > equations of einstein. Again Einstein spent much of his life> finding a> > > > Unified theory that would unify electromagnetics with gravity BUT> > > FAILED. > > > > > > > > On the other hand QUANTUM MECHANICS claims that nothing in life is> > > > predictable infact everything is a probability. And QM explains> atoms> > > > etc the world of sub atomic very well (this would include thebrain)> > > >

the body etc, after all brain is essential a complex neuralnetwork> > > > working on neurotransmitters signals which are electrical in> nature. > > > > So it is quite justified that QM is applicable to us as well> since we> > > > are made of atoms, eletrons etc. But the problem you run into> with QM> > > > is that nothing is certain and that everything is described as a> > > > probablity wave function of something called the scrhorodingers> > > > equation. I would want you to refer to the thought experimenttermed> > > > "Schroender's Cat" which is hard for me to explain on this fourm> but I> > > > am sure you will take the initiative of reading it, in short every> > > > observation made my an reference observer will change thecourse of> > > > this obervation directly or

indirectly depending on theobservation> > > > being made. Simply put, there is too much random ness existent> in this> > > > universe to be able to describe anything in any accruancy,> especially> > > > when it comes to life or the atomic scale. > > > > > > > > Now applying the above theories to describe astrology, many of the> > > > General predictions we make about the past or even the future at> times> > > > happen to come true, yet there are many more predictions we made> that> > > > do not come true at all. Because we are juggling betweencertainity> > > > and chaos and that is not the fault or positive aspect of anyone> > > > astrological system but rather the law of nature (God if you may> call> > > > it). You have claimed in your past emails that KAS

is veryaccurate> > > > however on my sincere application of these principles I have> found it> > > > smiliar to any other system because the rate of predicitiondoes not> > > > change much as compared to prashara or k.p or jaimini for that> > matter. > > > > > > > > It is however a different story if we only look at the positive> aspect> > > > and not realise the shortcomings of any system. My approach is> to look> > > > at the short comings of this system simply because it might help> > > > improve the system in some other way (again thats not job). Mysole> > > > intention for this posting has been to again reiterate on a> scientific> > > > ground the limitations of astrology and that of human mind and> that no> > > > matter how hard we try we

will be bound by many contraints. You> might> > > > claim that KAS predictions have come true, but I have appliedbasic> > > > principles of many charts some of which have yielded results but> again> > > > some of them have not yielded the correct results (this I see> with an> > > > open mind) leading me to believe and again affirm with theview that> > > > astrology has limitations on what can be predicted. Any whenwe are> > > > bound by such limitations then ethically we should take a more> > > > cautious approach in predicting in the first place and perhaps a> more> > > > understanding, less materialistic (making money out of astrology)> > > > attitude in researching things. This would also involve being> open to> > > > genuine thoughts weather pro or against any

system in thebetterment> > > > of knowledge. > > > > > > > > To end it Einstein once said "God does not play dice with the> > > > Universe" on seeing Quatum Mechanics back in the 30s he was> > > > diasspointed with QM because he felt there was no free willand that> > > > there was no such thing as probablity. A famous QuautumTheorist (I> > > > will let you figure out who) responded by saying "Not onlydoes God> > > > play dice with Us, He also puts it in places where we cannot find> > it". > > > > > > > > :) I hope you see this message not as a threat to your system but> > > > rather as an open ended question to ponder on keeping aside> > > > ego,predjuice or any other negative emotions. > > > > > > > > regards and Best>

> > > Amit> > > >> > >> >>

Be a better Heartthrob. Get better relationship answers from someone who knows. Answers - Check it out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dear Harjeet,

 

No, what u have said is right and your reply made me happy to see

your progress.

 

Cheers !!!

Ash -> http://www.ashtro.ca

 

 

 

 

 

On Behalf Of harjeet bakshi

Thursday September 13, 2007

12:41 PM

 

 

Re: Dear Ash et All :On the Creation of Universe and Cosmology as applicable to

 

 

 

 

 

Dear Ashji,

whenever one of my teacher used to give me smile.. i used to do

something wrong in solving a problem... but she would not tell me till

i asked her.

so did i do something wrong?

thanks/regards

harjeet

 

,

" ashsam73 " <kas

wrote:

>

> Dear Harjeet,

>

> :-)

>

> Cheers !!!

> Ash -> http://www.ashtro.ca

>

> ,

" Ash " <kas@> wrote:

> >

> > Dear Harjeet,

> >

> >

> >

> > :-)

> >

> >

> >

> > Cheers !!!

> >

> > Ash -> <http://www.ashtro.ca>

http://www.ashtro.ca

> >

> > _____

> >

> >

> >

On Behalf Of harjeet

> > bakshi

> > Thursday September 13, 2007 11:19 AM

> >

> > Re: Dear Ash et All :On the

> Creation of

> > Universe and Cosmology as applicable to

> >

> >

> >

> > Resp. Ashji,

> > more over current antra of rahu samdhari to venus and mars.

> > mars have more points for 12th compared to 11th.

> > venus has 20 for 11th and 17 for 12th.

> > rahu in 9th house triggers 12th and 4th house.

> > so mars points in ws and rahu's position points to more expenditure

in

> > current antra.

> > moreover antras of mars,saturn,moon,mercury and sun have less

points

> > in worsheet for 11th house compared to 12th.

> > only jupiter and venus have a just little more points in 11th

compared

> > to 12th.

> > plus the sav in 12th is more than 11th.

> > dont we take mean of sav from sun,moon and lagna ?

> > anything wrong in my thinking?

> > thanks/regards

> > harjeet

> >

> > astrologyandtiminge

> > <%40>

> vents ,

> > " Ash " <kas@> wrote:

> > >

> > > Dear Amit,

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > > With this data u have given,

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > > 19th May 1986

> > >

> > > 12:10 PM

> > >

> > > New Delhi

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > > Planet

> > >

> > > Degrees

> > >

> > >

> > > As

> > >

> > > 5 Le 38

> > >

> > >

> > > Su

> > >

> > > 5 Ta 14

> > >

> > >

> > > Mo

> > >

> > > 2 Vi 38

> > >

> > >

> > > Ma

> > >

> > > 27 Sg 51

> > >

> > >

> > > Me

> > >

> > > 0 Ta 39

> > >

> > >

> > > Ju

> > >

> > > 25 Aq 40

> > >

> > >

> > > Ve

> > >

> > > 4 Ge 28

> > >

> > >

> > > SaR

> > >

> > > 14 Sc 17

> > >

> > >

> > > Ra

> > >

> > > 5 Ar 44

> > >

> > >

> > > Ke

> > >

> > > 5 Li 44

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > > House

> > >

> > > 1

> > >

> > > 2

> > >

> > > 3

> > >

> > > 4

> > >

> > > 5

> > >

> > > 6

> > >

> > > 7

> > >

> > > 8

> > >

> > > 9

> > >

> > > 10

> > >

> > > 11

> > >

> > > 12

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > > Sun

> > >

> >

>

<file:///C:\Documents%20and%20Settings\ENagawkar\Desktop\KASMaster.xls#BAV!T

> > > 7#BAV!T7>

> > >

> > > 10

> > >

> > > 3

> > >

> > > 3

> > >

> > > 4

> > >

> > > 5

> > >

> > > 5

> > >

> > > 4

> > >

> > > 4

> > >

> > > 3

> > >

> > > 1

> > >

> > > 4

> > >

> > > 6

> > >

> > > 6

> > >

> > > 48

> > >

> > >

> > > Moon

> > >

> >

>

<file:///C:\Documents%20and%20Settings\ENagawkar\Desktop\KASMaster.xls#BAV!A

> > > J7#BAV!AJ7>

> > >

> > > 2

> > >

> > > 4

> > >

> > > 6

> > >

> > > 4

> > >

> > > 4

> > >

> > > 4

> > >

> > > 4

> > >

> > > 6

> > >

> > > 5

> > >

> > > 3

> > >

> > > 4

> > >

> > > 2

> > >

> > > 3

> > >

> > > 49

> > >

> > >

> > > Mars

> > >

> >

>

<file:///C:\Documents%20and%20Settings\ENagawkar\Desktop\KASMaster.xls#BAV!D

> > > 34#BAV!D34>

> > >

> > > 5

> > >

> > > 2

> > >

> > > 4

> > >

> > > 4

> > >

> > > 4

> > >

> > > 2

> > >

> > > 4

> > >

> > > 3

> > >

> > > 3

> > >

> > > 1

> > >

> > > 3

> > >

> > > 3

> > >

> > > 6

> > >

> > > 39

> > >

> > >

> > > Mercury

> > >

> >

>

<file:///C:\Documents%20and%20Settings\ENagawkar\Desktop\KASMaster.xls#BAV!T

> > > 34#BAV!T34>

> > >

> > > 10

> > >

> > > 4

> > >

> > > 7

> > >

> > > 5

> > >

> > > 2

> > >

> > > 4

> > >

> > > 6

> > >

> > > 4

> > >

> > > 4

> > >

> > > 4

> > >

> > > 3

> > >

> > > 5

> > >

> > > 6

> > >

> > > 54

> > >

> > >

> > > Jupiter

> > >

> >

>

<file:///C:\Documents%20and%20Settings\ENagawkar\Desktop\KASMaster.xls#BAV!A

> > > J34#BAV!AJ34>

> > >

> > > 7

> > >

> > > 4

> > >

> > > 4

> > >

> > > 5

> > >

> > > 4

> > >

> > > 4

> > >

> > > 6

> > >

> > > 5

> > >

> > > 7

> > >

> > > 4

> > >

> > > 5

> > >

> > > 4

> > >

> > > 4

> > >

> > > 56

> > >

> > >

> > > Venus

> > >

> >

>

<file:///C:\Documents%20and%20Settings\ENagawkar\Desktop\KASMaster.xls#BAV!G

> > > 61#BAV!G61>

> > >

> > > 11

> > >

> > > 5

> > >

> > > 6

> > >

> > > 6

> > >

> > > 4

> > >

> > > 4

> > >

> > > 4

> > >

> > > 3

> > >

> > > 5

> > >

> > > 5

> > >

> > > 2

> > >

> > > 4

> > >

> > > 4

> > >

> > > 52

> > >

> > >

> > > Saturn

> > >

> >

>

<file:///C:\Documents%20and%20Settings\ENagawkar\Desktop\KASMaster.xls#BAV!T

> > > 61#BAV!T61>

> > >

> > > 4

> > >

> > > 2

> > >

> > > 2

> > >

> > > 3

> > >

> > > 5

> > >

> > > 3

> > >

> > > 4

> > >

> > > 4

> > >

> > > 3

> > >

> > > 4

> > >

> > > 4

> > >

> > > 3

> > >

> > > 2

> > >

> > > 39

> > >

> > >

> > > Totals

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > > 24

> > >

> > > 32

> > >

> > > 31

> > >

> > > 28

> > >

> > > 26

> > >

> > > 32

> > >

> > > 29

> > >

> > > 30

> > >

> > > 22

> > >

> > > 25

> > >

> > > 27

> > >

> > > 31

> > >

> > > 337

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > > The points in 12th are more than 11th.

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > > In any case, let it be.

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > > Cheers !!!

> > >

> > > Ash -> <http://www.ashtro.

<http://www.ashtro.ca> ca>

> http://www.ashtro.

> > <http://www.ashtro.ca>

ca

> > >

> > > _____

> > >

> > > astrologyandtiminge

> > <%40>

> vents

> > > [astrologyandtiminge

> > <%40>

> vents ]

> > On Behalf Of planck12

> > > Wednesday September 12, 2007 7:58 PM

> > > astrologyandtiminge

> > <%40>

> vents

> > > Re: Dear Ash et All :On

the

> > Creation of

> > > Universe and Cosmology as applicable to

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > > Dear Ash,

> > > Yes, I completely concur and thats all I wanted to clarify from

my

> > > end. Again before I leave I have another chart if anyone wants

to use

> > > from educational stand point.

> > >

> > > 19 May 1986

> > > 12:10pm

> > > new delhi.

 

> > >

> > > Again i decided to relate the 11/12th house points, in this

chart

> > > again the worksheet decided to give more points in 11th house

than

> > > 12th. But the girl has no savings, he is quite spendrift and

have

> > > numerous expenses as compared to her income.

> > >

> > > Also to double check other things, i decided to check other factors,

> > > her brillancy for that matter. I think she has two parts in

saturn

> > > degrees as shown with the work sheet. But she is not very

intelligent,

> > > again a decent girl who is quite jovial, but she has done a

> > > certificate course and works in a local bank. As I understand it

from

> > > the notes if one part is in saturn then person has odinary

> > > intelligence and if two he/she has good intelligence. In her

case she

> > > is normal like anyone else who has no part in saturns division.

> > >

> > > Feel free to check, incase there are other things required, as

is

> > > always the case in terms of details.

> > >

> > > 1. The girl is unmarried

> > > 2. Wheatish complexion

> > > 3. works in a bank as teller

> > > 4. From a middle class family

> > > 5. Has good morals, but tends to be energetic and hyper at times

 

> > >

> > > regards

> > > Nicked Vish (Amit) I prefer Vish

> > >

> > > astrologyandtiminge

> > > <%40>

> > vents (AT) (DOT) <vents%40>

com,

> > > " Ash " <kas@> wrote:

> > > >

> > > > Dear Amit / Vishy (?),

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > Everyone is entitled to their own opinion and All the more

reason we

> > > should

> > > > get back to KAS :-)

> > > >

> > > > Cheers !!!

> > > >

> > > > Ash -> <http://www.ashtro.

<http://www.ashtro.

> <http://www.ashtro.ca>

> > ca> ca>

> > http://www.ashtro.

> > > <http://www.ashtro. <http://www.ashtro.ca> ca> ca

> > > >

> > > > _____

> > > >

> > > > astrologyandtiminge

> > > <%40>

> > vents (AT) (DOT) <vents%40>

com

> > > > [astrologyandtiminge

> > > <%40>

> > vents (AT) (DOT) <vents%40>

com]

> > > On Behalf Of

> > > astroquery12

> > > > Wednesday September 12, 2007 7:11 PM

> > > > astrologyandtiminge

> > > <%40>

> > vents (AT) (DOT) <vents%40>

com

> > > > Dear Ash et All

:On the

> > Creation of

> > > > Universe and Cosmology as applicable to Astr

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > Hi,

> > > > Hope you are doing well. This is Amit again, had posted

under a

> > > > different name prior but that account did not seem to work

and

> had to

> > > > create a new id.

> > > >

> > > > I have been following the lessons for a while and again I

see many

> > > > in-consistencies with the system. My intention is not to

refute or

> > > > accept the system but purely to learn it and see it

practicality and

> > > > in the process provide my thoughts in opinions (after all

the

> > > > astrology forum is a free form for discussion). Some of my

> doubts have

> > > > cropped up again with the usual, 11th house points vs 12th

house

> > > > points and the actual condition of the charts (again this

is only

> > > > treating the chart with KAS)as opposed to mixing parashra

or k.p

> etc.

> > > >

> > > > On another note, perhaps I can take the liberty to explain

again on

> > > > why this happens and hopefully you concur with my points

and

facts.

> > > > After all astrology will make more meaning if we understand

it

from

> > > > all angles. You are a computer scientist (a man of science)

yourself

> > > > and perhaps this description will make sense and will take

a

purely

> > > > scientific approach to it:

> > > >

> > > > I am sure you are familiar at least on the basic level with

> Einstein's

> > > > relativity and the other theory called Quantum Mechanics.

During the

> > > > creation of the universe at the point of big bang it is

widely

> > > > believed that there were four fundamental forces in the

universe:

> > > > Gravity, electromagnetic, weak nuclear and strong nuclear.

It is

> also

> > > > now very well accepted that relativity explains Gravity

very

> elegantly

> > > > and that the theory has been tested to the point of

calculations

> > > > pertaning to perhilion of mercury (closest pass to the sun)

with

> > > > accuracy. On the other hand Quantum mechanics has done well

in

> > > > unifying the other three forces of the electromagnetic and

nuclear

> > > > nature. BUT a BIG TWIST comes into the picture.

> > > >

> > > > Realivity claims that events (spacetime continum is 4D) are

all

> > > > associated together and there is no concept of past and

future or

> > > > present and in simple terms the destiney is already written

and

> > > > nothing can change it, so given the right set of laws one

can

> predict

> > > > the course of life and the cosmos (relativistic conditions

on

> > > > cosmology)to a complete accurate picture based on

fundametal field

> > > > equations of einstein. Again Einstein spent much of his

life

> finding a

> > > > Unified theory that would unify electromagnetics with

gravity BUT

> > > FAILED.

> > > >

> > > > On the other hand QUANTUM MECHANICS claims that nothing in

life is

> > > > predictable infact everything is a probability. And QM

explains

> atoms

> > > > etc the world of sub atomic very well (this would include

the

brain)

> > > > the body etc, after all brain is essential a complex neural

network

> > > > working on neurotransmitters signals which are electrical

in

> nature.

> > > > So it is quite justified that QM is applicable to us as

well

> since we

> > > > are made of atoms, eletrons etc. But the problem you run

into

> with QM

> > > > is that nothing is certain and that everything is described

as a

> > > > probablity wave function of something called the

scrhorodingers

> > > > equation. I would want you to refer to the thought

experiment

termed

> > > > " Schroender's Cat " which is hard for me to

explain on this fourm

> but I

> > > > am sure you will take the initiative of reading it, in

short every

> > > > observation made my an reference observer will change the

course of

> > > > this obervation directly or indirectly depending on the

observation

> > > > being made. Simply put, there is too much random ness

existent

> in this

> > > > universe to be able to describe anything in any accruancy,

> especially

> > > > when it comes to life or the atomic scale.

> > > >

> > > > Now applying the above theories to describe astrology, many

of the

> > > > General predictions we make about the past or even the

future at

> times

> > > > happen to come true, yet there are many more predictions we

made

> that

> > > > do not come true at all. Because we are juggling between

certainity

> > > > and chaos and that is not the fault or positive aspect of

anyone

> > > > astrological system but rather the law of nature (God if

you may

> call

> > > > it). You have claimed in your past emails that KAS is very

accurate

> > > > however on my sincere application of these principles I

have

> found it

> > > > smiliar to any other system because the rate of predicition

does not

> > > > change much as compared to prashara or k.p or jaimini for

that

> > matter.

> > > >

> > > > It is however a different story if we only look at the

positive

> aspect

> > > > and not realise the shortcomings of any system. My approach

is

> to look

> > > > at the short comings of this system simply because it might

help

> > > > improve the system in some other way (again thats not job).

My

sole

> > > > intention for this posting has been to again reiterate on a

> scientific

> > > > ground the limitations of astrology and that of human mind

and

> that no

> > > > matter how hard we try we will be bound by many contraints.

You

> might

> > > > claim that KAS predictions have come true, but I have

applied

basic

> > > > principles of many charts some of which have yielded

results but

> again

> > > > some of them have not yielded the correct results (this I

see

> with an

> > > > open mind) leading me to believe and again affirm with the

view that

> > > > astrology has limitations on what can be predicted. Any

when

we are

> > > > bound by such limitations then ethically we should take a

more

> > > > cautious approach in predicting in the first place and

perhaps a

> more

> > > > understanding, less materialistic (making money out of

astrology)

> > > > attitude in researching things. This would also involve

being

> open to

> > > > genuine thoughts weather pro or against any system in the

betterment

> > > > of knowledge.

> > > >

> > > > To end it Einstein once said " God does not play dice

with the

> > > > Universe " on seeing Quatum Mechanics back in the 30s

he was

> > > > diasspointed with QM because he felt there was no free will

and that

> > > > there was no such thing as probablity. A famous Quautum

Theorist (I

> > > > will let you figure out who) responded by saying " Not

only

does God

> > > > play dice with Us, He also puts it in places where we

cannot find

> > it " .

> > > >

> > > > :) I hope you see this message not as a threat to your

system but

> > > > rather as an open ended question to ponder on keeping aside

> > > > ego,predjuice or any other negative emotions.

> > > >

> > > > regards and Best

> > > > Amit

> > > >

> > >

> >

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dear Anup,

 

What is the meaning of finding the basic strength in D-Chart. Just

think over it.

We are adding A+B+C points.

So if there are 0’s in a D chart then they automatically get

reflected in the Basic Strength in the D-Chart WS.

 

 

Cheers !!!

Ash -> http://www.ashtro.ca

 

 

 

 

 

On Behalf Of Anup. M

Thursday September 13, 2007

12:56 PM

 

Re:

Re: Dear Ash et All :On the Creation of Universe and

Cosmology as applicable to

 

 

 

 

 

 

Dear Harjeet ,

 

 

 

 

 

" us shehar mein jao,to itna use kehna,

baqi na sune koi, sirf tanha usay kehna,

kuch log safar kay liye mozo'n (suitable) nahi hotay,

kuch raaste kate nahi tanha,itna use kehna "

 

 

 

 

 

Now tell me,how the quality of a marriage will be, if there is no

zero in SAV by any planet

 

 

and three zero in navamsa :) and What about such case...denial or

delay of marriage??

 

 

 

 

 

Regards

 

 

Anup

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

harjeet bakshi

<harjeet_bakshi > wrote:

 

 

 

 

Dear Ashji,

whenever one of my teacher used to give me smile.. i used to do

something wrong in solving a problem... but she would not tell me till

i asked her.

so did i do something wrong?

thanks/regards

harjeet

 

,

" ashsam73 " <kas

wrote:

>

> Dear Harjeet,

>

> :-)

>

> Cheers !!!

> Ash -> http://www.ashtro.ca

>

> ,

" Ash " <kas@> wrote:

> >

> > Dear Harjeet,

> >

> >

> >

> > :-)

> >

> >

> >

> > Cheers !!!

> >

> > Ash -> <http://www.ashtro.ca>

http://www.ashtro.ca

> >

> > _____

> >

> >

> >

On Behalf Of harjeet

> > bakshi

> > Thursday September 13, 2007 11:19 AM

> >

> > Re: Dear Ash et All :On the

> Creation of

> > Universe and Cosmology as applicable to

> >

> >

> >

> > Resp. Ashji,

> > more over current antra of rahu samdhari to venus and mars.

> > mars have more points for 12th compared to 11th.

> > venus has 20 for 11th and 17 for 12th.

> > rahu in 9th house triggers 12th and 4th house.

> > so mars points in ws and rahu's position points to more expenditure

in

> > current antra.

> > moreover antras of mars,saturn,moon,mercury and sun have less

points

> > in worsheet for 11th house compared to 12th.

> > only jupiter and venus have a just little more points in 11th

compared

> > to 12th.

> > plus the sav in 12th is more than 11th.

> > dont we take mean of sav from sun,moon and lagna ?

> > anything wrong in my thinking?

> > thanks/regards

> > harjeet

> >

> > astrologyandtiminge

> > <%40>

> vents ,

> > " Ash " <kas@> wrote:

> > >

> > > Dear Amit,

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > > With this data u have given,

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > > 19th May 1986

> > >

> > > 12:10 PM

> > >

> > > New Delhi

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > > Planet

> > >

> > > Degrees

> > >

> > >

> > > As

> > >

> > > 5 Le 38

> > >

> > >

> > > Su

> > >

> > > 5 Ta 14

> > >

> > >

> > > Mo

> > >

> > > 2 Vi 38

> > >

> > >

> > > Ma

> > >

> > > 27 Sg 51

> > >

> > >

> > > Me

> > >

> > > 0 Ta 39

> > >

> > >

> > > Ju

> > >

> > > 25 Aq 40

> > >

> > >

> > > Ve

> > >

> > > 4 Ge 28

> > >

> > >

> > > SaR

> > >

> > > 14 Sc 17

> > >

> > >

> > > Ra

> > >

> > > 5 Ar 44

> > >

> > >

> > > Ke

> > >

> > > 5 Li 44

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > > House

> > >

> > > 1

> > >

> > > 2

> > >

> > > 3

> > >

> > > 4

> > >

> > > 5

> > >

> > > 6

> > >

> > > 7

> > >

> > > 8

> > >

> > > 9

> > >

> > > 10

> > >

> > > 11

> > >

> > > 12

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > > Sun

> > >

> >

>

<file:///C:\Documents%20and%20Settings\ENagawkar\Desktop\KASMaster.xls#BAV!T

> > > 7#BAV!T7>

> > >

> > > 10

> > >

> > > 3

> > >

> > > 3

> > >

> > > 4

> > >

> > > 5

> > >

> > > 5

> > >

> > > 4

> > >

> > > 4

> > >

> > > 3

> > >

> > > 1

> > >

> > > 4

> > >

> > > 6

> > >

> > > 6

> > >

> > > 48

> > >

> > >

> > > Moon

> > >

> >

>

<file:///C:\Documents%20and%20Settings\ENagawkar\Desktop\KASMaster.xls#BAV!A

> > > J7#BAV!AJ7>

> > >

> > > 2

> > >

> > > 4

> > >

> > > 6

> > >

> > > 4

> > >

> > > 4

> > >

> > > 4

> > >

> > > 4

> > >

> > > 6

> > >

> > > 5

> > >

> > > 3

> > >

> > > 4

> > >

> > > 2

> > >

> > > 3

> > >

> > > 49

> > >

> > >

> > > Mars

> > >

> >

>

<file:///C:\Documents%20and%20Settings\ENagawkar\Desktop\KASMaster.xls#BAV!D

> > > 34#BAV!D34>

> > >

> > > 5

> > >

> > > 2

> > >

> > > 4

> > >

> > > 4

> > >

> > > 4

> > >

> > > 2

> > >

> > > 4

> > >

> > > 3

> > >

> > > 3

> > >

> > > 1

> > >

> > > 3

> > >

> > > 3

> > >

> > > 6

> > >

> > > 39

> > >

> > >

> > > Mercury

> > >

> >

>

<file:///C:\Documents%20and%20Settings\ENagawkar\Desktop\KASMaster.xls#BAV!T

> > > 34#BAV!T34>

> > >

> > > 10

> > >

> > > 4

> > >

> > > 7

> > >

> > > 5

> > >

> > > 2

> > >

> > > 4

> > >

> > > 6

> > >

> > > 4

> > >

> > > 4

> > >

> > > 4

> > >

> > > 3

> > >

> > > 5

> > >

> > > 6

> > >

> > > 54

> > >

> > >

> > > Jupiter

> > >

> >

>

<file:///C:\Documents%20and%20Settings\ENagawkar\Desktop\KASMaster.xls#BAV!A

> > > J34#BAV!AJ34>

> > >

> > > 7

> > >

> > > 4

> > >

> > > 4

> > >

> > > 5

> > >

> > > 4

> > >

> > > 4

> > >

> > > 6

> > >

> > > 5

> > >

> > > 7

> > >

> > > 4

> > >

> > > 5

> > >

> > > 4

> > >

> > > 4

> > >

> > > 56

> > >

> > >

> > > Venus

> > >

> >

>

<file:///C:\Documents%20and%20Settings\ENagawkar\Desktop\KASMaster.xls#BAV!G

> > > 61#BAV!G61>

> > >

> > > 11

> > >

> > > 5

> > >

> > > 6

> > >

> > > 6

> > >

> > > 4

> > >

> > > 4

> > >

> > > 4

> > >

> > > 3

> > >

> > > 5

> > >

> > > 5

> > >

> > > 2

> > >

> > > 4

> > >

> > > 4

> > >

> > > 52

> > >

> > >

> > > Saturn

> > >

> >

>

<file:///C:\Documents%20and%20Settings\ENagawkar\Desktop\KASMaster.xls#BAV!T

> > > 61#BAV!T61>

> > >

> > > 4

> > >

> > > 2

> > >

> > > 2

> > >

> > > 3

> > >

> > > 5

> > >

> > > 3

> > >

> > > 4

> > >

> > > 4

> > >

> > > 3

> > >

> > > 4

> > >

> > > 4

> > >

> > > 3

> > >

> > > 2

> > >

> > > 39

> > >

> > >

> > > Totals

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > > 24

> > >

> > > 32

> > >

> > > 31

> > >

> > > 28

> > >

> > > 26

> > >

> > > 32

> > >

> > > 29

> > >

> > > 30

> > >

> > > 22

> > >

> > > 25

> > >

> > > 27

> > >

> > > 31

> > >

> > > 337

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > > The points in 12th are more than 11th.

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > > In any case, let it be.

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > > Cheers !!!

> > >

> > > Ash -> <http://www.ashtro.

<http://www.ashtro.ca> ca>

> http://www.ashtro.

> > <http://www.ashtro.ca>

ca

> > >

> > > _____

> > >

> > > astrologyandtiminge

> > <%40>

> vents

> > > [astrologyandtiminge

> > <%40>

> vents ]

> > On Behalf Of planck12

> > > Wednesday September 12, 2007 7:58 PM

> > > astrologyandtiminge

> > <%40>

> vents

> > > Re: Dear Ash et All :On

the

> > Creation of

> > > Universe and Cosmology as applicable to

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > > Dear Ash,

> > > Yes, I completely concur and thats all I wanted to clarify from

my

> > > end. Again before I leave I have another chart if anyone wants

to use

> > > from educational stand point.

> > >

> > > 19 May 1986

> > > 12:10pm

> > > new delhi.

 

> > >

> > > Again i decided to relate the 11/12th house points, in this

chart

> > > again the worksheet decided to give more points in 11th house

than

> > > 12th. But the girl has no savings, he is quite spendrift and

have

> > > numerous expenses as compared to her income.

> > >

> > > Also to double check other things, i decided to check other

factors,

> > > her brillancy for that matter. I think she has two parts in

saturn

> > > degrees as shown with the work sheet. But she is not very

intelligent,

> > > again a decent girl who is quite jovial, but she has done a

> > > certificate course and works in a local bank. As I understand it

from

> > > the notes if one part is in saturn then person has odinary

> > > intelligence and if two he/she has good intelligence. In her

case she

> > > is normal like anyone else who has no part in saturns division.

> > >

> > > Feel free to check, incase there are other things required, as

is

> > > always the case in terms of details.

> > >

> > > 1. The girl is unmarried

> > > 2. Wheatish complexion

> > > 3. works in a bank as teller

> > > 4. From a middle class family

> > > 5. Has good morals, but tends to be energetic and hyper at times

 

> > >

> > > regards

> > > Nicked Vish (Amit) I prefer Vish

> > >

> > > astrologyandtiminge

> > > <%40>

> > vents (AT) (DOT) <vents%40>

com,

> > > " Ash " <kas@> wrote:

> > > >

> > > > Dear Amit / Vishy (?),

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > Everyone is entitled to their own opinion and All the more

reason we

> > > should

> > > > get back to KAS :-)

> > > >

> > > > Cheers !!!

> > > >

> > > > Ash -> <http://www.ashtro.

<http://www.ashtro.

> <http://www.ashtro.ca>

> > ca> ca>

> > http://www.ashtro.

> > > <http://www.ashtro. <http://www.ashtro.ca> ca> ca

> > > >

> > > > _____

> > > >

> > > > astrologyandtiminge

> > > <%40>

> > vents (AT) (DOT) <vents%40>

com

> > > > [astrologyandtiminge

> > > <%40>

> > vents (AT) (DOT) <vents%40>

com]

> > > On Behalf Of

> > > astroquery12

> > > > Wednesday September 12, 2007 7:11 PM

> > > > astrologyandtiminge

> > > <%40>

> > vents (AT) (DOT) <vents%40>

com

> > > > Dear Ash et All

:On the

> > Creation of

> > > > Universe and Cosmology as applicable to Astr

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > Hi,

> > > > Hope you are doing well. This is Amit again, had posted

under a

> > > > different name prior but that account did not seem to work

and

> had to

> > > > create a new id.

> > > >

> > > > I have been following the lessons for a while and again I

see many

> > > > in-consistencies with the system. My intention is not to

refute or

> > > > accept the system but purely to learn it and see it

practicality and

> > > > in the process provide my thoughts in opinions (after all

the

> > > > astrology forum is a free form for discussion). Some of my

> doubts have

> > > > cropped up again with the usual, 11th house points vs 12th

house

> > > > points and the actual condition of the charts (again this

is only

> > > > treating the chart with KAS)as opposed to mixing parashra

or k.p

> etc.

> > > >

> > > > On another note, perhaps I can take the liberty to explain

again on

> > > > why this happens and hopefully you concur with my points

and

facts.

> > > > After all astrology will make more meaning if we understand

it

from

> > > > all angles. You are a computer scientist (a man of science)

yourself

> > > > and perhaps this description will make sense and will take

a

purely

> > > > scientific approach to it:

> > > >

> > > > I am sure you are familiar at least on the basic level with

> Einstein's

> > > > relativity and the other theory called Quantum Mechanics.

During the

> > > > creation of the universe at the point of big bang it is

widely

> > > > believed that there were four fundamental forces in the

universe:

> > > > Gravity, electromagnetic, weak nuclear and strong nuclear.

It is

> also

> > > > now very well accepted that relativity explains Gravity

very

> elegantly

> > > > and that the theory has been tested to the point of

calculations

> > > > pertaning to perhilion of mercury (closest pass to the sun)

with

> > > > accuracy. On the other hand Quantum mechanics has done well

in

> > > > unifying the other three forces of the electromagnetic and

nuclear

> > > > nature. BUT a BIG TWIST comes into the picture.

> > > >

> > > > Realivity claims that events (spacetime continum is 4D) are

all

> > > > associated together and there is no concept of past and

future or

> > > > present and in simple terms the destiney is already written

and

> > > > nothing can change it, so given the right set of laws one

can

> predict

> > > > the course of life and the cosmos (relativistic conditions

on

> > > > cosmology)to a complete accurate picture based on

fundametal field

> > > > equations of einstein. Again Einstein spent much of his

life

> finding a

> > > > Unified theory that would unify electromagnetics with

gravity BUT

> > > FAILED.

> > > >

> > > > On the other hand QUANTUM MECHANICS claims that nothing in

life is

> > > > predictable infact everything is a probability. And QM

explains

> atoms

> > > > etc the world of sub atomic very well (this would include

the

brain)

> > > > the body etc, after all brain is essential a complex neural

network

> > > > working on neurotransmitters signals which are electrical

in

> nature.

> > > > So it is quite justified that QM is applicable to us as

well

> since we

> > > > are made of atoms, eletrons etc. But the problem you run

into

> with QM

> > > > is that nothing is certain and that everything is described

as a

> > > > probablity wave function of something called the

scrhorodingers

> > > > equation. I would want you to refer to the thought experiment

termed

> > > > " Schroender's Cat " which is hard for me to

explain on this fourm

> but I

> > > > am sure you will take the initiative of reading it, in

short every

> > > > observation made my an reference observer will change the

course of

> > > > this obervation directly or indirectly depending on the

observation

> > > > being made. Simply put, there is too much random ness

existent

> in this

> > > > universe to be able to describe anything in any accruancy,

> especially

> > > > when it comes to life or the atomic scale.

> > > >

> > > > Now applying the above theories to describe astrology, many

of the

> > > > General predictions we make about the past or even the

future at

> times

> > > > happen to come true, yet there are many more predictions we

made

> that

> > > > do not come true at all. Because we are juggling between

certainity

> > > > and chaos and that is not the fault or positive aspect of

anyone

> > > > astrological system but rather the law of nature (God if

you may

> call

> > > > it). You have claimed in your past emails that KAS is very

accurate

> > > > however on my sincere application of these principles I

have

> found it

> > > > smiliar to any other system because the rate of predicition

does not

> > > > change much as compared to prashara or k.p or jaimini for

that

> > matter.

> > > >

> > > > It is however a different story if we only look at the

positive

> aspect

> > > > and not realise the shortcomings of any system. My approach

is

> to look

> > > > at the short comings of this system simply because it might

help

> > > > improve the system in some other way (again thats not job).

My

sole

> > > > intention for this posting has been to again reiterate on a

> scientific

> > > > ground the limitations of astrology and that of human mind

and

> that no

> > > > matter how hard we try we will be bound by many contraints.

You

> might

> > > > claim that KAS predictions have come true, but I have

applied

basic

> > > > principles of many charts some of which have yielded

results but

> again

> > > > some of them have not yielded the correct results (this I

see

> with an

> > > > open mind) leading me to believe and again affirm with the

view that

> > > > astrology has limitations on what can be predicted. Any

when

we are

> > > > bound by such limitations then ethically we should take a

more

> > > > cautious approach in predicting in the first place and

perhaps a

> more

> > > > understanding, less materialistic (making money out of

astrology)

> > > > attitude in researching things. This would also involve

being

> open to

> > > > genuine thoughts weather pro or against any system in the

betterment

> > > > of knowledge.

> > > >

> > > > To end it Einstein once said " God does not play dice

with the

> > > > Universe " on seeing Quatum Mechanics back in the 30s

he was

> > > > diasspointed with QM because he felt there was no free will

and that

> > > > there was no such thing as probablity. A famous Quautum

Theorist (I

> > > > will let you figure out who) responded by saying " Not

only

does God

> > > > play dice with Us, He also puts it in places where we

cannot find

> > it " .

> > > >

> > > > :) I hope you see this message not as a threat to your

system but

> > > > rather as an open ended question to ponder on keeping aside

> > > > ego,predjuice or any other negative emotions.

> > > >

> > > > regards and Best

> > > > Amit

> > > >

> > >

> >

>

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Be a better Heartthrob. Get

better relationship answers from someone who knows.

Answers - Check it out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dear Anup,

wah wah!!

can you please give the birth data so other factors can be seen.

as per your question if i had to answer without considering other

factors... i am optimistic.. i would say delayed marriage :).

remember Krushnaji said.. 50% of effect by planet rest by efforts of

person. and if there are blessing in chart or from up above..

thanks/regards

harjeet

 

, " Anup. M "

<dalh_1 wrote:

>

> Dear Harjeet ,

>

> " us shehar mein jao,to itna use kehna,

> baqi na sune koi, sirf tanha usay kehna,

> kuch log safar kay liye mozo'n (suitable) nahi hotay,

> kuch raaste kate nahi tanha,itna use kehna "

>

> Now tell me,how the quality of a marriage will be, if there is no

zero in SAV by any planet

> and three zero in navamsa :) and What about such case...denial or

delay of marriage??

>

> Regards

> Anup

>

>

harjeet bakshi <harjeet_bakshi wrote:

> Dear Ashji,

> whenever one of my teacher used to give me smile.. i used to do

> something wrong in solving a problem... but she would not tell me till

> i asked her.

> so did i do something wrong?

> thanks/regards

> harjeet

>

> , " ashsam73 " <kas@>

> wrote:

> >

> > Dear Harjeet,

> >

> > :-)

> >

> > Cheers !!!

> > Ash -> http://www.ashtro.ca

> >

> > , " Ash " <kas@> wrote:

> > >

> > > Dear Harjeet,

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > > :-)

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > > Cheers !!!

> > >

> > > Ash -> <http://www.ashtro.ca> http://www.ashtro.ca

> > >

> > > _____

> > >

> > >

> > > On Behalf Of

harjeet

> > > bakshi

> > > Thursday September 13, 2007 11:19 AM

> > >

> > > Re: Dear Ash et All :On the

> > Creation of

> > > Universe and Cosmology as applicable to

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > > Resp. Ashji,

> > > more over current antra of rahu samdhari to venus and mars.

> > > mars have more points for 12th compared to 11th.

> > > venus has 20 for 11th and 17 for 12th.

> > > rahu in 9th house triggers 12th and 4th house.

> > > so mars points in ws and rahu's position points to more

expenditure in

> > > current antra.

> > > moreover antras of mars,saturn,moon,mercury and sun have less points

> > > in worsheet for 11th house compared to 12th.

> > > only jupiter and venus have a just little more points in 11th

compared

> > > to 12th.

> > > plus the sav in 12th is more than 11th.

> > > dont we take mean of sav from sun,moon and lagna ?

> > > anything wrong in my thinking?

> > > thanks/regards

> > > harjeet

> > >

> > > astrologyandtiminge

> > > <%40>

> > vents ,

> > > " Ash " <kas@> wrote:

> > > >

> > > > Dear Amit,

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > With this data u have given,

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > 19th May 1986

> > > >

> > > > 12:10 PM

> > > >

> > > > New Delhi

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > Planet

> > > >

> > > > Degrees

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > As

> > > >

> > > > 5 Le 38

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > Su

> > > >

> > > > 5 Ta 14

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > Mo

> > > >

> > > > 2 Vi 38

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > Ma

> > > >

> > > > 27 Sg 51

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > Me

> > > >

> > > > 0 Ta 39

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > Ju

> > > >

> > > > 25 Aq 40

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > Ve

> > > >

> > > > 4 Ge 28

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > SaR

> > > >

> > > > 14 Sc 17

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > Ra

> > > >

> > > > 5 Ar 44

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > Ke

> > > >

> > > > 5 Li 44

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > House

> > > >

> > > > 1

> > > >

> > > > 2

> > > >

> > > > 3

> > > >

> > > > 4

> > > >

> > > > 5

> > > >

> > > > 6

> > > >

> > > > 7

> > > >

> > > > 8

> > > >

> > > > 9

> > > >

> > > > 10

> > > >

> > > > 11

> > > >

> > > > 12

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > Sun

> > > >

> > >

> >

>

<file:///C:\Documents%20and%20Settings\ENagawkar\Desktop\KASMaster.xls#BAV!T

> > > > 7#BAV!T7>

> > > >

> > > > 10

> > > >

> > > > 3

> > > >

> > > > 3

> > > >

> > > > 4

> > > >

> > > > 5

> > > >

> > > > 5

> > > >

> > > > 4

> > > >

> > > > 4

> > > >

> > > > 3

> > > >

> > > > 1

> > > >

> > > > 4

> > > >

> > > > 6

> > > >

> > > > 6

> > > >

> > > > 48

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > Moon

> > > >

> > >

> >

>

<file:///C:\Documents%20and%20Settings\ENagawkar\Desktop\KASMaster.xls#BAV!A

> > > > J7#BAV!AJ7>

> > > >

> > > > 2

> > > >

> > > > 4

> > > >

> > > > 6

> > > >

> > > > 4

> > > >

> > > > 4

> > > >

> > > > 4

> > > >

> > > > 4

> > > >

> > > > 6

> > > >

> > > > 5

> > > >

> > > > 3

> > > >

> > > > 4

> > > >

> > > > 2

> > > >

> > > > 3

> > > >

> > > > 49

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > Mars

> > > >

> > >

> >

>

<file:///C:\Documents%20and%20Settings\ENagawkar\Desktop\KASMaster.xls#BAV!D

> > > > 34#BAV!D34>

> > > >

> > > > 5

> > > >

> > > > 2

> > > >

> > > > 4

> > > >

> > > > 4

> > > >

> > > > 4

> > > >

> > > > 2

> > > >

> > > > 4

> > > >

> > > > 3

> > > >

> > > > 3

> > > >

> > > > 1

> > > >

> > > > 3

> > > >

> > > > 3

> > > >

> > > > 6

> > > >

> > > > 39

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > Mercury

> > > >

> > >

> >

>

<file:///C:\Documents%20and%20Settings\ENagawkar\Desktop\KASMaster.xls#BAV!T

> > > > 34#BAV!T34>

> > > >

> > > > 10

> > > >

> > > > 4

> > > >

> > > > 7

> > > >

> > > > 5

> > > >

> > > > 2

> > > >

> > > > 4

> > > >

> > > > 6

> > > >

> > > > 4

> > > >

> > > > 4

> > > >

> > > > 4

> > > >

> > > > 3

> > > >

> > > > 5

> > > >

> > > > 6

> > > >

> > > > 54

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > Jupiter

> > > >

> > >

> >

>

<file:///C:\Documents%20and%20Settings\ENagawkar\Desktop\KASMaster.xls#BAV!A

> > > > J34#BAV!AJ34>

> > > >

> > > > 7

> > > >

> > > > 4

> > > >

> > > > 4

> > > >

> > > > 5

> > > >

> > > > 4

> > > >

> > > > 4

> > > >

> > > > 6

> > > >

> > > > 5

> > > >

> > > > 7

> > > >

> > > > 4

> > > >

> > > > 5

> > > >

> > > > 4

> > > >

> > > > 4

> > > >

> > > > 56

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > Venus

> > > >

> > >

> >

>

<file:///C:\Documents%20and%20Settings\ENagawkar\Desktop\KASMaster.xls#BAV!G

> > > > 61#BAV!G61>

> > > >

> > > > 11

> > > >

> > > > 5

> > > >

> > > > 6

> > > >

> > > > 6

> > > >

> > > > 4

> > > >

> > > > 4

> > > >

> > > > 4

> > > >

> > > > 3

> > > >

> > > > 5

> > > >

> > > > 5

> > > >

> > > > 2

> > > >

> > > > 4

> > > >

> > > > 4

> > > >

> > > > 52

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > Saturn

> > > >

> > >

> >

>

<file:///C:\Documents%20and%20Settings\ENagawkar\Desktop\KASMaster.xls#BAV!T

> > > > 61#BAV!T61>

> > > >

> > > > 4

> > > >

> > > > 2

> > > >

> > > > 2

> > > >

> > > > 3

> > > >

> > > > 5

> > > >

> > > > 3

> > > >

> > > > 4

> > > >

> > > > 4

> > > >

> > > > 3

> > > >

> > > > 4

> > > >

> > > > 4

> > > >

> > > > 3

> > > >

> > > > 2

> > > >

> > > > 39

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > Totals

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > 24

> > > >

> > > > 32

> > > >

> > > > 31

> > > >

> > > > 28

> > > >

> > > > 26

> > > >

> > > > 32

> > > >

> > > > 29

> > > >

> > > > 30

> > > >

> > > > 22

> > > >

> > > > 25

> > > >

> > > > 27

> > > >

> > > > 31

> > > >

> > > > 337

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > The points in 12th are more than 11th.

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > In any case, let it be.

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > Cheers !!!

> > > >

> > > > Ash -> <http://www.ashtro. <http://www.ashtro.ca> ca>

> > http://www.ashtro.

> > > <http://www.ashtro.ca> ca

> > > >

> > > > _____

> > > >

> > > > astrologyandtiminge

> > > <%40>

> > vents

> > > > [astrologyandtiminge

> > > <%40>

> > vents ]

> > > On Behalf Of planck12

> > > > Wednesday September 12, 2007 7:58 PM

> > > > astrologyandtiminge

> > > <%40>

> > vents

> > > > Re: Dear Ash et All :On the

> > > Creation of

> > > > Universe and Cosmology as applicable to

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > Dear Ash,

> > > > Yes, I completely concur and thats all I wanted to clarify from my

> > > > end. Again before I leave I have another chart if anyone wants

> to use

> > > > from educational stand point.

> > > >

> > > > 19 May 1986

> > > > 12:10pm

> > > > new delhi.

> > > >

> > > > Again i decided to relate the 11/12th house points, in this chart

> > > > again the worksheet decided to give more points in 11th house than

> > > > 12th. But the girl has no savings, he is quite spendrift and have

> > > > numerous expenses as compared to her income.

> > > >

> > > > Also to double check other things, i decided to check other

factors,

> > > > her brillancy for that matter. I think she has two parts in saturn

> > > > degrees as shown with the work sheet. But she is not very

> intelligent,

> > > > again a decent girl who is quite jovial, but she has done a

> > > > certificate course and works in a local bank. As I understand it

> from

> > > > the notes if one part is in saturn then person has odinary

> > > > intelligence and if two he/she has good intelligence. In her

> case she

> > > > is normal like anyone else who has no part in saturns division.

> > > >

> > > > Feel free to check, incase there are other things required, as is

> > > > always the case in terms of details.

> > > >

> > > > 1. The girl is unmarried

> > > > 2. Wheatish complexion

> > > > 3. works in a bank as teller

> > > > 4. From a middle class family

> > > > 5. Has good morals, but tends to be energetic and hyper at times

> > > >

> > > > regards

> > > > Nicked Vish (Amit) I prefer Vish

> > > >

> > > > astrologyandtiminge

> > > > <%40>

> > > vents (AT) (DOT) <vents%40> com,

> > > > " Ash " <kas@> wrote:

> > > > >

> > > > > Dear Amit / Vishy (?),

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > > Everyone is entitled to their own opinion and All the more

> reason we

> > > > should

> > > > > get back to KAS :-)

> > > > >

> > > > > Cheers !!!

> > > > >

> > > > > Ash -> <http://www.ashtro. <http://www.ashtro.

> > <http://www.ashtro.ca>

> > > ca> ca>

> > > http://www.ashtro.

> > > > <http://www.ashtro. <http://www.ashtro.ca> ca> ca

> > > > >

> > > > > _____

> > > > >

> > > > > astrologyandtiminge

> > > > <%40>

> > > vents (AT) (DOT) <vents%40> com

> > > > > [astrologyandtiminge

> > > > <%40>

> > > vents (AT) (DOT) <vents%40> com]

> > > > On Behalf Of

> > > > astroquery12

> > > > > Wednesday September 12, 2007 7:11 PM

> > > > > astrologyandtiminge

> > > > <%40>

> > > vents (AT) (DOT) <vents%40> com

> > > > > Dear Ash et All :On the

> > > Creation of

> > > > > Universe and Cosmology as applicable to Astr

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > > Hi,

> > > > > Hope you are doing well. This is Amit again, had posted under a

> > > > > different name prior but that account did not seem to work and

> > had to

> > > > > create a new id.

> > > > >

> > > > > I have been following the lessons for a while and again I

see many

> > > > > in-consistencies with the system. My intention is not to

refute or

> > > > > accept the system but purely to learn it and see it

> practicality and

> > > > > in the process provide my thoughts in opinions (after all the

> > > > > astrology forum is a free form for discussion). Some of my

> > doubts have

> > > > > cropped up again with the usual, 11th house points vs 12th house

> > > > > points and the actual condition of the charts (again this is

only

> > > > > treating the chart with KAS)as opposed to mixing parashra or k.p

> > etc.

> > > > >

> > > > > On another note, perhaps I can take the liberty to explain

> again on

> > > > > why this happens and hopefully you concur with my points and

> facts.

> > > > > After all astrology will make more meaning if we understand it

> from

> > > > > all angles. You are a computer scientist (a man of science)

> yourself

> > > > > and perhaps this description will make sense and will take a

> purely

> > > > > scientific approach to it:

> > > > >

> > > > > I am sure you are familiar at least on the basic level with

> > Einstein's

> > > > > relativity and the other theory called Quantum Mechanics.

> During the

> > > > > creation of the universe at the point of big bang it is widely

> > > > > believed that there were four fundamental forces in the

universe:

> > > > > Gravity, electromagnetic, weak nuclear and strong nuclear. It is

> > also

> > > > > now very well accepted that relativity explains Gravity very

> > elegantly

> > > > > and that the theory has been tested to the point of calculations

> > > > > pertaning to perhilion of mercury (closest pass to the sun) with

> > > > > accuracy. On the other hand Quantum mechanics has done well in

> > > > > unifying the other three forces of the electromagnetic and

nuclear

> > > > > nature. BUT a BIG TWIST comes into the picture.

> > > > >

> > > > > Realivity claims that events (spacetime continum is 4D) are all

> > > > > associated together and there is no concept of past and

future or

> > > > > present and in simple terms the destiney is already written and

> > > > > nothing can change it, so given the right set of laws one can

> > predict

> > > > > the course of life and the cosmos (relativistic conditions on

> > > > > cosmology)to a complete accurate picture based on fundametal

field

> > > > > equations of einstein. Again Einstein spent much of his life

> > finding a

> > > > > Unified theory that would unify electromagnetics with

gravity BUT

> > > > FAILED.

> > > > >

> > > > > On the other hand QUANTUM MECHANICS claims that nothing in

life is

> > > > > predictable infact everything is a probability. And QM explains

> > atoms

> > > > > etc the world of sub atomic very well (this would include the

> brain)

> > > > > the body etc, after all brain is essential a complex neural

> network

> > > > > working on neurotransmitters signals which are electrical in

> > nature.

> > > > > So it is quite justified that QM is applicable to us as well

> > since we

> > > > > are made of atoms, eletrons etc. But the problem you run into

> > with QM

> > > > > is that nothing is certain and that everything is described as a

> > > > > probablity wave function of something called the scrhorodingers

> > > > > equation. I would want you to refer to the thought experiment

> termed

> > > > > " Schroender's Cat " which is hard for me to explain on this fourm

> > but I

> > > > > am sure you will take the initiative of reading it, in short

every

> > > > > observation made my an reference observer will change the

> course of

> > > > > this obervation directly or indirectly depending on the

> observation

> > > > > being made. Simply put, there is too much random ness existent

> > in this

> > > > > universe to be able to describe anything in any accruancy,

> > especially

> > > > > when it comes to life or the atomic scale.

> > > > >

> > > > > Now applying the above theories to describe astrology, many

of the

> > > > > General predictions we make about the past or even the future at

> > times

> > > > > happen to come true, yet there are many more predictions we made

> > that

> > > > > do not come true at all. Because we are juggling between

> certainity

> > > > > and chaos and that is not the fault or positive aspect of anyone

> > > > > astrological system but rather the law of nature (God if you may

> > call

> > > > > it). You have claimed in your past emails that KAS is very

> accurate

> > > > > however on my sincere application of these principles I have

> > found it

> > > > > smiliar to any other system because the rate of predicition

> does not

> > > > > change much as compared to prashara or k.p or jaimini for that

> > > matter.

> > > > >

> > > > > It is however a different story if we only look at the positive

> > aspect

> > > > > and not realise the shortcomings of any system. My approach is

> > to look

> > > > > at the short comings of this system simply because it might help

> > > > > improve the system in some other way (again thats not job). My

> sole

> > > > > intention for this posting has been to again reiterate on a

> > scientific

> > > > > ground the limitations of astrology and that of human mind and

> > that no

> > > > > matter how hard we try we will be bound by many contraints. You

> > might

> > > > > claim that KAS predictions have come true, but I have applied

> basic

> > > > > principles of many charts some of which have yielded results but

> > again

> > > > > some of them have not yielded the correct results (this I see

> > with an

> > > > > open mind) leading me to believe and again affirm with the

> view that

> > > > > astrology has limitations on what can be predicted. Any when

> we are

> > > > > bound by such limitations then ethically we should take a more

> > > > > cautious approach in predicting in the first place and perhaps a

> > more

> > > > > understanding, less materialistic (making money out of

astrology)

> > > > > attitude in researching things. This would also involve being

> > open to

> > > > > genuine thoughts weather pro or against any system in the

> betterment

> > > > > of knowledge.

> > > > >

> > > > > To end it Einstein once said " God does not play dice with the

> > > > > Universe " on seeing Quatum Mechanics back in the 30s he was

> > > > > diasspointed with QM because he felt there was no free will

> and that

> > > > > there was no such thing as probablity. A famous Quautum

> Theorist (I

> > > > > will let you figure out who) responded by saying " Not only

> does God

> > > > > play dice with Us, He also puts it in places where we cannot

find

> > > it " .

> > > > >

> > > > > :) I hope you see this message not as a threat to your

system but

> > > > > rather as an open ended question to ponder on keeping aside

> > > > > ego,predjuice or any other negative emotions.

> > > > >

> > > > > regards and Best

> > > > > Amit

> > > > >

> > > >

> > >

> >

 

> Be a better Heartthrob. Get better relationship answers from someone

who knows.

> Answers - Check it out.

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dear Ash nd Harjeet, Thanks Ash...i cld understand as you are teaching us step by step. Besides that Harjeet is my classmate and naughty, so wanted to divert his attention by some way:) Btw, here is one of the illustration by you in some archive... " YOGAS, OR SAY SARVASHTAKAVARGA IS CASTED IN ALL D CHARTS SO ITMEANS THAT PLANETS RELATION W.R.T EACH OTHER OR YOGAS ARE CONSIDEREDAND THAT POWER I.E. WHEN WE FIND THE BASIC STRENGTH THEN THAT GIVESTHE POWER OF 7 PLANETS IN 12 HOUSES IN NAVAMSA ONLY, SO HERE ITNAVAMSA IS A D-CHART AND LIKE ALL D-CHART WHEN FINDING POWER U ONLYCHECK THE BASIC STRENGTH AND NO ASPECTS OR 4:10 ARE CONSIDERED FORD-CHART AND NAVAMSA AS WELL WHICH IS ALSO A D-CHART" Regards Anup Ash <kas wrote: Dear Anup, What is the meaning of finding the basic strength in D-Chart. Just think over it. We are adding A+B+C points. So if there are 0’s in a D chart then they automatically get reflected in the Basic Strength in the D-Chart WS. Cheers !!! Ash -> http://www.ashtro.ca

On Behalf Of Anup. MThursday September 13, 2007 12:56 PM Subject: Re: Re: Dear Ash et All :On the Creation of Universe and Cosmology as applicable to Dear Harjeet , "us shehar mein jao,to itna use kehna,baqi na sune koi, sirf tanha usay kehna,kuch log safar kay liye mozo'n (suitable) nahi hotay,kuch raaste kate nahi tanha,itna use kehna" Now tell me,how the quality of a marriage will be, if there is no zero in SAV by any planet and three zero in navamsa :) and What about such case...denial or delay of marriage?? Regards Anup harjeet bakshi <harjeet_bakshi > wrote: Dear Ashji,whenever one of my teacher used to give me smile.. i used to dosomething wrong in solving a

problem... but she would not tell me tilli asked her.so did i do something wrong?thanks/regardsharjeet , "ashsam73" <kaswrote:>> Dear Harjeet,> > :-)> > Cheers !!!> Ash -> http://www.ashtro.ca> > , "Ash" <kas@> wrote:> >> > Dear Harjeet,> > > > > > > > :-) > > > > > > > > Cheers !!!> > > > Ash -> <http://www.ashtro.ca> http://www.ashtro.ca> > > > _____ >

> > > > > On Behalf Of harjeet> > bakshi> > Thursday September 13, 2007 11:19 AM> > > > Re: Dear Ash et All :On the> Creation of> > Universe and Cosmology as applicable to> > > > > > > > Resp. Ashji,> > more over current antra of rahu samdhari to venus and mars.> > mars have more points for 12th compared to 11th.> > venus has 20 for 11th and 17 for 12th.> > rahu in 9th house triggers 12th and 4th house.>

> so mars points in ws and rahu's position points to more expenditure in> > current antra.> > moreover antras of mars,saturn,moon,mercury and sun have less points> > in worsheet for 11th house compared to 12th.> > only jupiter and venus have a just little more points in 11th compared> > to 12th.> > plus the sav in 12th is more than 11th.> > dont we take mean of sav from sun,moon and lagna ?> > anything wrong in my thinking?> > thanks/regards> > harjeet> > > > astrologyandtiminge> > <%40>> vents ,> > "Ash" <kas@> wrote:> > >> > > Dear Amit,> > > > > > > > > > > > With this data u have given,>

> > > > > > > > > > > 19th May 1986> > > > > > 12:10 PM> > > > > > New Delhi> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Planet> > > > > > Degrees> > > > > > > > > As> > > > > > 5 Le 38> > > > > > > > > Su> > > > > > 5 Ta 14> > > > > > > > > Mo> > > > > > 2 Vi 38> > > > > > > > > Ma> > > > > > 27 Sg 51> > > > > > > > > Me> > > > > > 0 Ta 39> > > > > > > > > Ju> > > >

> > 25 Aq 40> > > > > > > > > Ve> > > > > > 4 Ge 28> > > > > > > > > SaR> > > > > > 14 Sc 17> > > > > > > > > Ra> > > > > > 5 Ar 44> > > > > > > > > Ke> > > > > > 5 Li 44> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > House> > > > > > 1> > > > > > 2> > > > > > 3> > > > > > 4> > > > > > 5> > > > > > 6> > > > > > 7> > > > > > 8> > > > > > 9> > >

> > > 10> > > > > > 11> > > > > > 12> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Sun> > >> >><file:///C:\Documents%20and%20Settings\ENagawkar\Desktop\KASMaster.xls#BAV!T> > > 7#BAV!T7> > > > > > > 10> > > > > > 3> > > > > > 3> > > > > > 4> > > > > > 5> > > > > > 5> > > > > > 4> > > > > > 4> > > > > > 3> > > > > > 1> > > > > > 4> > > > > > 6> > > > > > 6> > > > > > 48> > > > >

> > > > Moon> > >> >><file:///C:\Documents%20and%20Settings\ENagawkar\Desktop\KASMaster.xls#BAV!A> > > J7#BAV!AJ7> > > > > > > 2> > > > > > 4> > > > > > 6> > > > > > 4> > > > > > 4> > > > > > 4> > > > > > 4> > > > > > 6> > > > > > 5> > > > > > 3> > > > > > 4> > > > > > 2> > > > > > 3> > > > > > 49> > > > > > > > > Mars> > >> >><file:///C:\Documents%20and%20Settings\ENagawkar\Desktop\KASMaster.xls#BAV!D> > > 34#BAV!D34> > > > > > > 5> > > > > > 2> > > > > > 4> > > > > > 4> > > > > > 4> > > > > > 2> > > > > > 4> > > > > > 3> > > > > > 3> > > > > > 1> > > > > > 3> > > > > > 3> > > > > > 6> > > > > > 39> > > > > > > > > Mercury> > >> >><file:///C:\Documents%20and%20Settings\ENagawkar\Desktop\KASMaster.xls#BAV!T> > > 34#BAV!T34> > >

> > > > 10> > > > > > 4> > > > > > 7> > > > > > 5> > > > > > 2> > > > > > 4> > > > > > 6> > > > > > 4> > > > > > 4> > > > > > 4> > > > > > 3> > > > > > 5> > > > > > 6> > > > > > 54> > > > > > > > > Jupiter> > >> >><file:///C:\Documents%20and%20Settings\ENagawkar\Desktop\KASMaster.xls#BAV!A> > > J34#BAV!AJ34> > > > > > > 7> > > > > > 4> > > > > > 4> > > > > > 5> > >

> > > 4> > > > > > 4> > > > > > 6> > > > > > 5> > > > > > 7> > > > > > 4> > > > > > 5> > > > > > 4> > > > > > 4> > > > > > 56> > > > > > > > > Venus> > >> >><file:///C:\Documents%20and%20Settings\ENagawkar\Desktop\KASMaster.xls#BAV!G> > > 61#BAV!G61> > > > > > > 11> > > > > > 5> > > > > > 6> > > > > > 6> > > > > > 4> > > > > > 4> > > > > > 4> > > > > > 3> > > > >

> 5> > > > > > 5> > > > > > 2> > > > > > 4> > > > > > 4> > > > > > 52> > > > > > > > > Saturn> > >> >><file:///C:\Documents%20and%20Settings\ENagawkar\Desktop\KASMaster.xls#BAV!T> > > 61#BAV!T61> > > > > > > 4> > > > > > 2> > > > > > 2> > > > > > 3> > > > > > 5> > > > > > 3> > > > > > 4> > > > > > 4> > > > > > 3> > > > > > 4> > > > > > 4> > > > > > 3> > > > > > 2>

> > > > > 39> > > > > > > > > Totals> > > > > > > > > > > > 24> > > > > > 32> > > > > > 31> > > > > > 28> > > > > > 26> > > > > > 32> > > > > > 29> > > > > > 30> > > > > > 22> > > > > > 25> > > > > > 27> > > > > > 31> > > > > > 337> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The points in 12th are more than 11th.> > > > > > > > > > > > In any case, let it be.> > > > > > > > > > > > Cheers

!!!> > > > > > Ash -> <http://www.ashtro. <http://www.ashtro.ca> ca>> http://www.ashtro.> > <http://www.ashtro.ca> ca> > > > > > _____ > > > > > > astrologyandtiminge> > <%40>> vents > > > [astrologyandtiminge> > <%40>> vents ]> > On Behalf Of planck12> > > Wednesday September 12, 2007 7:58 PM> > > astrologyandtiminge> >

<%40>> vents > > > Re: Dear Ash et All :On the> > Creation of> > > Universe and Cosmology as applicable to> > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Ash, > > > Yes, I completely concur and thats all I wanted to clarify from my> > > end. Again before I leave I have another chart if anyone wantsto use> > > from educational stand point. > > > > > > 19 May 1986> > > 12:10pm > > > new delhi. > > > > > > Again i decided to relate the 11/12th house points, in this chart> > > again the worksheet decided to give more points in 11th house than> > > 12th. But the girl

has no savings, he is quite spendrift and have> > > numerous expenses as compared to her income. > > > > > > Also to double check other things, i decided to check other factors,> > > her brillancy for that matter. I think she has two parts in saturn> > > degrees as shown with the work sheet. But she is not veryintelligent,> > > again a decent girl who is quite jovial, but she has done a> > > certificate course and works in a local bank. As I understand itfrom> > > the notes if one part is in saturn then person has odinary> > > intelligence and if two he/she has good intelligence. In hercase she> > > is normal like anyone else who has no part in saturns division. > > > > > > Feel free to check, incase there are other things required, as is> > > always the case in terms of details. > >

> > > > 1. The girl is unmarried> > > 2. Wheatish complexion > > > 3. works in a bank as teller > > > 4. From a middle class family> > > 5. Has good morals, but tends to be energetic and hyper at times > > > > > > regards> > > Nicked Vish (Amit) I prefer Vish > > > > > > astrologyandtiminge> > > <%40>> > vents (AT) (DOT) <vents%40> com,> > > "Ash" <kas@> wrote:> > > >> > > > Dear Amit / Vishy (?),> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Everyone is entitled to their own opinion and All the morereason we> > > should> > > > get back to KAS :-)> > > >

> > > > Cheers !!!> > > > > > > > Ash -> <http://www.ashtro. <http://www.ashtro.> <http://www.ashtro.ca>> > ca> ca>> > http://www.ashtro.> > > <http://www.ashtro. <http://www.ashtro.ca> ca> ca> > > > > > > > _____ > > > > > > > > astrologyandtiminge> > > <%40>> > vents (AT) (DOT) <vents%40> com> > > > [astrologyandtiminge> > >

<%40>> > vents (AT) (DOT) <vents%40> com]> > > On Behalf Of> > > astroquery12> > > > Wednesday September 12, 2007 7:11 PM> > > > astrologyandtiminge> > > <%40>> > vents (AT) (DOT) <vents%40> com> > > > Dear Ash et All :On the> > Creation of> > > > Universe and Cosmology as applicable to Astr> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > Hope you are doing well. This is Amit again, had posted under a> > > > different name prior but that account did not seem to work and> had to>

> > > create a new id. > > > > > > > > I have been following the lessons for a while and again I see many> > > > in-consistencies with the system. My intention is not to refute or> > > > accept the system but purely to learn it and see itpracticality and> > > > in the process provide my thoughts in opinions (after all the> > > > astrology forum is a free form for discussion). Some of my> doubts have> > > > cropped up again with the usual, 11th house points vs 12th house> > > > points and the actual condition of the charts (again this is only> > > > treating the chart with KAS)as opposed to mixing parashra or k.p> etc. > > > > > > > > On another note, perhaps I can take the liberty to explainagain on> > > > why this happens and hopefully you concur with

my points andfacts.> > > > After all astrology will make more meaning if we understand itfrom> > > > all angles. You are a computer scientist (a man of science)yourself> > > > and perhaps this description will make sense and will take apurely> > > > scientific approach to it: > > > > > > > > I am sure you are familiar at least on the basic level with> Einstein's> > > > relativity and the other theory called Quantum Mechanics.During the> > > > creation of the universe at the point of big bang it is widely> > > > believed that there were four fundamental forces in the universe:> > > > Gravity, electromagnetic, weak nuclear and strong nuclear. It is> also> > > > now very well accepted that relativity explains Gravity very> elegantly> > > > and

that the theory has been tested to the point of calculations> > > > pertaning to perhilion of mercury (closest pass to the sun) with> > > > accuracy. On the other hand Quantum mechanics has done well in> > > > unifying the other three forces of the electromagnetic and nuclear> > > > nature. BUT a BIG TWIST comes into the picture. > > > > > > > > Realivity claims that events (spacetime continum is 4D) are all> > > > associated together and there is no concept of past and future or> > > > present and in simple terms the destiney is already written and> > > > nothing can change it, so given the right set of laws one can> predict> > > > the course of life and the cosmos (relativistic conditions on> > > > cosmology)to a complete accurate picture based on fundametal field> > > >

equations of einstein. Again Einstein spent much of his life> finding a> > > > Unified theory that would unify electromagnetics with gravity BUT> > > FAILED. > > > > > > > > On the other hand QUANTUM MECHANICS claims that nothing in life is> > > > predictable infact everything is a probability. And QM explains> atoms> > > > etc the world of sub atomic very well (this would include thebrain)> > > > the body etc, after all brain is essential a complex neuralnetwork> > > > working on neurotransmitters signals which are electrical in> nature. > > > > So it is quite justified that QM is applicable to us as well> since we> > > > are made of atoms, eletrons etc. But the problem you run into> with QM> > > > is that nothing is certain and that everything is described as

a> > > > probablity wave function of something called the scrhorodingers> > > > equation. I would want you to refer to the thought experimenttermed> > > > "Schroender's Cat" which is hard for me to explain on this fourm> but I> > > > am sure you will take the initiative of reading it, in short every> > > > observation made my an reference observer will change thecourse of> > > > this obervation directly or indirectly depending on theobservation> > > > being made. Simply put, there is too much random ness existent> in this> > > > universe to be able to describe anything in any accruancy,> especially> > > > when it comes to life or the atomic scale. > > > > > > > > Now applying the above theories to describe astrology, many of the> > > > General

predictions we make about the past or even the future at> times> > > > happen to come true, yet there are many more predictions we made> that> > > > do not come true at all. Because we are juggling betweencertainity> > > > and chaos and that is not the fault or positive aspect of anyone> > > > astrological system but rather the law of nature (God if you may> call> > > > it). You have claimed in your past emails that KAS is veryaccurate> > > > however on my sincere application of these principles I have> found it> > > > smiliar to any other system because the rate of predicitiondoes not> > > > change much as compared to prashara or k.p or jaimini for that> > matter. > > > > > > > > It is however a different story if we only look at the positive> aspect>

> > > and not realise the shortcomings of any system. My approach is> to look> > > > at the short comings of this system simply because it might help> > > > improve the system in some other way (again thats not job). Mysole> > > > intention for this posting has been to again reiterate on a> scientific> > > > ground the limitations of astrology and that of human mind and> that no> > > > matter how hard we try we will be bound by many contraints. You> might> > > > claim that KAS predictions have come true, but I have appliedbasic> > > > principles of many charts some of which have yielded results but> again> > > > some of them have not yielded the correct results (this I see> with an> > > > open mind) leading me to believe and again affirm with theview that> >

> > astrology has limitations on what can be predicted. Any whenwe are> > > > bound by such limitations then ethically we should take a more> > > > cautious approach in predicting in the first place and perhaps a> more> > > > understanding, less materialistic (making money out of astrology)> > > > attitude in researching things. This would also involve being> open to> > > > genuine thoughts weather pro or against any system in thebetterment> > > > of knowledge. > > > > > > > > To end it Einstein once said "God does not play dice with the> > > > Universe" on seeing Quatum Mechanics back in the 30s he was> > > > diasspointed with QM because he felt there was no free willand that> > > > there was no such thing as probablity. A famous QuautumTheorist (I> >

> > will let you figure out who) responded by saying "Not onlydoes God> > > > play dice with Us, He also puts it in places where we cannot find> > it". > > > > > > > > :) I hope you see this message not as a threat to your system but> > > > rather as an open ended question to ponder on keeping aside> > > > ego,predjuice or any other negative emotions. > > > > > > > > regards and Best> > > > Amit> > > >> > >> >> Be a better Heartthrob. Get better relationship answers from someone who knows. Answers - Check it out.

Got a little couch potato?

Check out fun summer activities for kids.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dear Hajreet,

The delay calculations are as per the technique taught, i.e. say if

Sa is in 5th house in Navamsa so marriage can get delayed etc etc.

0’s in Rasi chart are used to find delay, but 0 in d-chart

has not been specified by Krushnaji.

0’s in D chart get covered in the basic strength

calculation.

 

 

Cheers !!!

Ash -> http://www.ashtro.ca

 

 

 

 

 

On Behalf Of harjeet bakshi

Thursday September 13, 2007

1:16 PM

 

Subject:

Re: Dear Ash et All :On the Creation of Universe and

Cosmology as applicable to

 

 

 

 

 

Dear Anup,

wah wah!!

can you please give the birth data so other factors can be seen.

as per your question if i had to answer without considering other

factors... i am optimistic.. i would say delayed marriage :).

remember Krushnaji said.. 50% of effect by planet rest by efforts of

person. and if there are blessing in chart or from up above..

thanks/regards

harjeet

 

,

" Anup. M "

<dalh_1 wrote:

>

> Dear Harjeet ,

>

> " us shehar mein jao,to itna use kehna,

> baqi na sune koi, sirf tanha usay kehna,

> kuch log safar kay liye mozo'n (suitable) nahi hotay,

> kuch raaste kate nahi tanha,itna use kehna "

>

> Now tell me,how the quality of a marriage will be, if there is no

zero in SAV by any planet

> and three zero in navamsa :) and What about such case...denial or

delay of marriage??

>

> Regards

> Anup

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

> harjeet bakshi <harjeet_bakshi wrote:

> Dear Ashji,

> whenever one of my teacher used to give me smile.. i used to do

> something wrong in solving a problem... but she would not tell me till

> i asked her.

> so did i do something wrong?

> thanks/regards

> harjeet

>

> ,

" ashsam73 " <kas@>

> wrote:

> >

> > Dear Harjeet,

> >

> > :-)

> >

> > Cheers !!!

> > Ash -> http://www.ashtro.ca

> >

> > ,

" Ash " <kas@> wrote:

> > >

> > > Dear Harjeet,

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > > :-)

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > > Cheers !!!

> > >

> > > Ash -> <http://www.ashtro.ca>

http://www.ashtro.ca

> > >

> > > _____

> > >

> > >

> > >

On Behalf Of

harjeet

> > > bakshi

> > > Thursday September 13, 2007 11:19 AM

> > >

> > > Re: Dear Ash et All :On

the

> > Creation of

> > > Universe and Cosmology as applicable to

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > > Resp. Ashji,

> > > more over current antra of rahu samdhari to venus and mars.

> > > mars have more points for 12th compared to 11th.

> > > venus has 20 for 11th and 17 for 12th.

> > > rahu in 9th house triggers 12th and 4th house.

> > > so mars points in ws and rahu's position points to more

expenditure in

> > > current antra.

> > > moreover antras of mars,saturn,moon,mercury and sun have

less points

> > > in worsheet for 11th house compared to 12th.

> > > only jupiter and venus have a just little more points in 11th

compared

> > > to 12th.

> > > plus the sav in 12th is more than 11th.

> > > dont we take mean of sav from sun,moon and lagna ?

> > > anything wrong in my thinking?

> > > thanks/regards

> > > harjeet

> > >

> > > astrologyandtiminge

> > > <%40>

> > vents ,

> > > " Ash " <kas@> wrote:

> > > >

> > > > Dear Amit,

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > With this data u have given,

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > 19th May 1986

> > > >

> > > > 12:10 PM

> > > >

> > > > New Delhi

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > Planet

> > > >

> > > > Degrees

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > As

> > > >

> > > > 5 Le 38

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > Su

> > > >

> > > > 5 Ta 14

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > Mo

> > > >

> > > > 2 Vi 38

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > Ma

> > > >

> > > > 27 Sg 51

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > Me

> > > >

> > > > 0 Ta 39

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > Ju

> > > >

> > > > 25 Aq 40

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > Ve

> > > >

> > > > 4 Ge 28

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > SaR

> > > >

> > > > 14 Sc 17

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > Ra

> > > >

> > > > 5 Ar 44

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > Ke

> > > >

> > > > 5 Li 44

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > House

> > > >

> > > > 1

> > > >

> > > > 2

> > > >

> > > > 3

> > > >

> > > > 4

> > > >

> > > > 5

> > > >

> > > > 6

> > > >

> > > > 7

> > > >

> > > > 8

> > > >

> > > > 9

> > > >

> > > > 10

> > > >

> > > > 11

> > > >

> > > > 12

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > Sun

> > > >

> > >

> >

>

<file:///C:\Documents%20and%20Settings\ENagawkar\Desktop\KASMaster.xls#BAV!T

> > > > 7#BAV!T7>

> > > >

> > > > 10

> > > >

> > > > 3

> > > >

> > > > 3

> > > >

> > > > 4

> > > >

> > > > 5

> > > >

> > > > 5

> > > >

> > > > 4

> > > >

> > > > 4

> > > >

> > > > 3

> > > >

> > > > 1

> > > >

> > > > 4

> > > >

> > > > 6

> > > >

> > > > 6

> > > >

> > > > 48

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > Moon

> > > >

> > >

> >

>

<file:///C:\Documents%20and%20Settings\ENagawkar\Desktop\KASMaster.xls#BAV!A

> > > > J7#BAV!AJ7>

> > > >

> > > > 2

> > > >

> > > > 4

> > > >

> > > > 6

> > > >

> > > > 4

> > > >

> > > > 4

> > > >

> > > > 4

> > > >

> > > > 4

> > > >

> > > > 6

> > > >

> > > > 5

> > > >

> > > > 3

> > > >

> > > > 4

> > > >

> > > > 2

> > > >

> > > > 3

> > > >

> > > > 49

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > Mars

> > > >

> > >

> >

>

<file:///C:\Documents%20and%20Settings\ENagawkar\Desktop\KASMaster.xls#BAV!D

> > > > 34#BAV!D34>

> > > >

> > > > 5

> > > >

> > > > 2

> > > >

> > > > 4

> > > >

> > > > 4

> > > >

> > > > 4

> > > >

> > > > 2

> > > >

> > > > 4

> > > >

> > > > 3

> > > >

> > > > 3

> > > >

> > > > 1

> > > >

> > > > 3

> > > >

> > > > 3

> > > >

> > > > 6

> > > >

> > > > 39

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > Mercury

> > > >

> > >

> >

>

<file:///C:\Documents%20and%20Settings\ENagawkar\Desktop\KASMaster.xls#BAV!T

> > > > 34#BAV!T34>

> > > >

> > > > 10

> > > >

> > > > 4

> > > >

> > > > 7

> > > >

> > > > 5

> > > >

> > > > 2

> > > >

> > > > 4

> > > >

> > > > 6

> > > >

> > > > 4

> > > >

> > > > 4

> > > >

> > > > 4

> > > >

> > > > 3

> > > >

> > > > 5

> > > >

> > > > 6

> > > >

> > > > 54

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > Jupiter

> > > >

> > >

> >

>

<file:///C:\Documents%20and%20Settings\ENagawkar\Desktop\KASMaster.xls#BAV!A

> > > > J34#BAV!AJ34>

> > > >

> > > > 7

> > > >

> > > > 4

> > > >

> > > > 4

> > > >

> > > > 5

> > > >

> > > > 4

> > > >

> > > > 4

> > > >

> > > > 6

> > > >

> > > > 5

> > > >

> > > > 7

> > > >

> > > > 4

> > > >

> > > > 5

> > > >

> > > > 4

> > > >

> > > > 4

> > > >

> > > > 56

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > Venus

> > > >

> > >

> >

>

<file:///C:\Documents%20and%20Settings\ENagawkar\Desktop\KASMaster.xls#BAV!G

> > > > 61#BAV!G61>

> > > >

> > > > 11

> > > >

> > > > 5

> > > >

> > > > 6

> > > >

> > > > 6

> > > >

> > > > 4

> > > >

> > > > 4

> > > >

> > > > 4

> > > >

> > > > 3

> > > >

> > > > 5

> > > >

> > > > 5

> > > >

> > > > 2

> > > >

> > > > 4

> > > >

> > > > 4

> > > >

> > > > 52

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > Saturn

> > > >

> > >

> >

>

<file:///C:\Documents%20and%20Settings\ENagawkar\Desktop\KASMaster.xls#BAV!T

> > > > 61#BAV!T61>

> > > >

> > > > 4

> > > >

> > > > 2

> > > >

> > > > 2

> > > >

> > > > 3

> > > >

> > > > 5

> > > >

> > > > 3

> > > >

> > > > 4

> > > >

> > > > 4

> > > >

> > > > 3

> > > >

> > > > 4

> > > >

> > > > 4

> > > >

> > > > 3

> > > >

> > > > 2

> > > >

> > > > 39

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > Totals

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > 24

> > > >

> > > > 32

> > > >

> > > > 31

> > > >

> > > > 28

> > > >

> > > > 26

> > > >

> > > > 32

> > > >

> > > > 29

> > > >

> > > > 30

> > > >

> > > > 22

> > > >

> > > > 25

> > > >

> > > > 27

> > > >

> > > > 31

> > > >

> > > > 337

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > The points in 12th are more than 11th.

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > In any case, let it be.

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > Cheers !!!

> > > >

> > > > Ash -> <http://www.ashtro.

<http://www.ashtro.ca> ca>

> > http://www.ashtro.

> > > <http://www.ashtro.ca>

ca

> > > >

> > > > _____

> > > >

> > > > astrologyandtiminge

> > > <%40>

> > vents

> > > > [astrologyandtiminge

> > > <%40>

> > vents ]

> > > On Behalf Of planck12

> > > > Wednesday September 12, 2007 7:58 PM

> > > > astrologyandtiminge

> > > <%40>

> > vents

> > > > Re: Dear Ash et

All :On the

> > > Creation of

> > > > Universe and Cosmology as applicable to

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > Dear Ash,

> > > > Yes, I completely concur and thats all I wanted to clarify

from my

> > > > end. Again before I leave I have another chart if anyone

wants

> to use

> > > > from educational stand point.

> > > >

> > > > 19 May 1986

> > > > 12:10pm

> > > > new delhi.

 

> > > >

> > > > Again i decided to relate the 11/12th house points, in this

chart

> > > > again the worksheet decided to give more points in 11th

house than

> > > > 12th. But the girl has no savings, he is quite spendrift

and have

> > > > numerous expenses as compared to her income.

> > > >

> > > > Also to double check other things, i decided to check other

factors,

> > > > her brillancy for that matter. I think she has two parts in

saturn

> > > > degrees as shown with the work sheet. But she is not very

> intelligent,

> > > > again a decent girl who is quite jovial, but she has done a

> > > > certificate course and works in a local bank. As I

understand it

> from

> > > > the notes if one part is in saturn then person has odinary

> > > > intelligence and if two he/she has good intelligence. In

her

> case she

> > > > is normal like anyone else who has no part in saturns

division.

> > > >

> > > > Feel free to check, incase there are other things required,

as is

> > > > always the case in terms of details.

> > > >

> > > > 1. The girl is unmarried

> > > > 2. Wheatish complexion

> > > > 3. works in a bank as teller

> > > > 4. From a middle class family

> > > > 5. Has good morals, but tends to be energetic and hyper at

times

> > > >

> > > > regards

> > > > Nicked Vish (Amit) I prefer Vish

> > > >

> > > > astrologyandtiminge

> > > > <%40>

> > > vents (AT) (DOT) <vents%40>

com,

> > > > " Ash " <kas@> wrote:

> > > > >

> > > > > Dear Amit / Vishy (?),

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > > Everyone is entitled to their own opinion and All the

more

> reason we

> > > > should

> > > > > get back to KAS :-)

> > > > >

> > > > > Cheers !!!

> > > > >

> > > > > Ash -> <http://www.ashtro.

<http://www.ashtro.

> > <http://www.ashtro.ca>

> > > ca> ca>

> > > http://www.ashtro.

> > > > <http://www.ashtro.

<http://www.ashtro.ca> ca> ca

> > > > >

> > > > > _____

> > > > >

> > > > > astrologyandtiminge

> > > > <%40>

> > > vents (AT) (DOT) <vents%40>

com

> > > > > [astrologyandtiminge

> > > > <%40>

> > > vents (AT) (DOT) <vents%40>

com]

> > > > On Behalf Of

> > > > astroquery12

> > > > > Wednesday September 12, 2007 7:11 PM

> > > > > astrologyandtiminge

> > > > <%40>

> > > vents (AT) (DOT) <vents%40>

com

> > > > > Dear Ash et

All :On the

> > > Creation of

> > > > > Universe and Cosmology as applicable to Astr

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > > Hi,

> > > > > Hope you are doing well. This is Amit again, had

posted under a

> > > > > different name prior but that account did not seem to

work and

> > had to

> > > > > create a new id.

> > > > >

> > > > > I have been following the lessons for a while and

again I

see many

> > > > > in-consistencies with the system. My intention is not

to

refute or

> > > > > accept the system but purely to learn it and see it

> practicality and

> > > > > in the process provide my thoughts in opinions (after

all the

> > > > > astrology forum is a free form for discussion). Some

of my

> > doubts have

> > > > > cropped up again with the usual, 11th house points vs

12th house

> > > > > points and the actual condition of the charts (again

this is

only

> > > > > treating the chart with KAS)as opposed to mixing

parashra or k.p

> > etc.

> > > > >

> > > > > On another note, perhaps I can take the liberty to

explain

> again on

> > > > > why this happens and hopefully you concur with my

points and

> facts.

> > > > > After all astrology will make more meaning if we

understand it

> from

> > > > > all angles. You are a computer scientist (a man of

science)

> yourself

> > > > > and perhaps this description will make sense and will

take a

> purely

> > > > > scientific approach to it:

> > > > >

> > > > > I am sure you are familiar at least on the basic level

with

> > Einstein's

> > > > > relativity and the other theory called Quantum

Mechanics.

> During the

> > > > > creation of the universe at the point of big bang it

is widely

> > > > > believed that there were four fundamental forces in the

universe:

> > > > > Gravity, electromagnetic, weak nuclear and strong

nuclear. It is

> > also

> > > > > now very well accepted that relativity explains

Gravity very

> > elegantly

> > > > > and that the theory has been tested to the point of

calculations

> > > > > pertaning to perhilion of mercury (closest pass to the

sun) with

> > > > > accuracy. On the other hand Quantum mechanics has done

well in

> > > > > unifying the other three forces of the electromagnetic

and

nuclear

> > > > > nature. BUT a BIG TWIST comes into the picture.

> > > > >

> > > > > Realivity claims that events (spacetime continum is

4D) are all

> > > > > associated together and there is no concept of past

and

future or

> > > > > present and in simple terms the destiney is already

written and

> > > > > nothing can change it, so given the right set of laws

one can

> > predict

> > > > > the course of life and the cosmos (relativistic

conditions on

> > > > > cosmology)to a complete accurate picture based on

fundametal

field

> > > > > equations of einstein. Again Einstein spent much of

his life

> > finding a

> > > > > Unified theory that would unify electromagnetics with

gravity BUT

> > > > FAILED.

> > > > >

> > > > > On the other hand QUANTUM MECHANICS claims that

nothing in

life is

> > > > > predictable infact everything is a probability. And QM

explains

> > atoms

> > > > > etc the world of sub atomic very well (this would

include the

> brain)

> > > > > the body etc, after all brain is essential a complex

neural

> network

> > > > > working on neurotransmitters signals which are

electrical in

> > nature.

> > > > > So it is quite justified that QM is applicable to us

as well

> > since we

> > > > > are made of atoms, eletrons etc. But the problem you

run into

> > with QM

> > > > > is that nothing is certain and that everything is

described as a

> > > > > probablity wave function of something called the

scrhorodingers

> > > > > equation. I would want you to refer to the thought

experiment

> termed

> > > > > " Schroender's Cat " which is hard for me

to explain on this fourm

> > but I

> > > > > am sure you will take the initiative of reading it, in

short

every

> > > > > observation made my an reference observer will change

the

> course of

> > > > > this obervation directly or indirectly depending on

the

> observation

> > > > > being made. Simply put, there is too much random ness

existent

> > in this

> > > > > universe to be able to describe anything in any

accruancy,

> > especially

> > > > > when it comes to life or the atomic scale.

> > > > >

> > > > > Now applying the above theories to describe astrology,

many

of the

> > > > > General predictions we make about the past or even the

future at

> > times

> > > > > happen to come true, yet there are many more

predictions we made

> > that

> > > > > do not come true at all. Because we are juggling

between

> certainity

> > > > > and chaos and that is not the fault or positive aspect

of anyone

> > > > > astrological system but rather the law of nature (God

if you may

> > call

> > > > > it). You have claimed in your past emails that KAS is

very

> accurate

> > > > > however on my sincere application of these principles

I have

> > found it

> > > > > smiliar to any other system because the rate of

predicition

> does not

> > > > > change much as compared to prashara or k.p or jaimini

for that

> > > matter.

> > > > >

> > > > > It is however a different story if we only look at the

positive

> > aspect

> > > > > and not realise the shortcomings of any system. My

approach is

> > to look

> > > > > at the short comings of this system simply because it

might help

> > > > > improve the system in some other way (again thats not

job). My

> sole

> > > > > intention for this posting has been to again reiterate

on a

> > scientific

> > > > > ground the limitations of astrology and that of human

mind and

> > that no

> > > > > matter how hard we try we will be bound by many

contraints. You

> > might

> > > > > claim that KAS predictions have come true, but I have

applied

> basic

> > > > > principles of many charts some of which have yielded

results but

> > again

> > > > > some of them have not yielded the correct results

(this I see

> > with an

> > > > > open mind) leading me to believe and again affirm with

the

> view that

> > > > > astrology has limitations on what can be predicted.

Any when

> we are

> > > > > bound by such limitations then ethically we should

take a more

> > > > > cautious approach in predicting in the first place and

perhaps a

> > more

> > > > > understanding, less materialistic (making money out of

astrology)

> > > > > attitude in researching things. This would also

involve being

> > open to

> > > > > genuine thoughts weather pro or against any system in

the

> betterment

> > > > > of knowledge.

> > > > >

> > > > > To end it Einstein once said " God does not play

dice with the

> > > > > Universe " on seeing Quatum Mechanics back in the

30s he was

> > > > > diasspointed with QM because he felt there was no free

will

> and that

> > > > > there was no such thing as probablity. A famous

Quautum

> Theorist (I

> > > > > will let you figure out who) responded by saying

" Not only

> does God

> > > > > play dice with Us, He also puts it in places where we

cannot

find

> > > it " .

> > > > >

> > > > > :) I hope you see this message not as a threat to your

system but

> > > > > rather as an open ended question to ponder on keeping

aside

> > > > > ego,predjuice or any other negative emotions.

> > > > >

> > > > > regards and Best

> > > > > Amit

> > > > >

> > > >

> > >

> >

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

> Be a better Heartthrob. Get better relationship answers from someone

who knows.

> Answers - Check it out.

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dear A & A,

so do we take it as denial ?

thanks/regards

harjeet

 

 

, " Anup. M "

<dalh_1 wrote:

>

> Dear Ash nd Harjeet,

>

> Thanks Ash...i cld understand as you are teaching us step by step.

> Besides that Harjeet is my classmate and naughty, so wanted to

> divert his attention by some way:)

>

> Btw, here is one of the illustration by you in some archive...

>

> " YOGAS, OR SAY SARVASHTAKAVARGA IS CASTED IN ALL D CHARTS SO IT

> MEANS THAT PLANETS RELATION W.R.T EACH OTHER OR YOGAS ARE CONSIDERED

> AND THAT POWER I.E. WHEN WE FIND THE BASIC STRENGTH THEN THAT GIVES

> THE POWER OF 7 PLANETS IN 12 HOUSES IN NAVAMSA ONLY, SO HERE IT

> NAVAMSA IS A D-CHART AND LIKE ALL D-CHART WHEN FINDING POWER U ONLY

> CHECK THE BASIC STRENGTH AND NO ASPECTS OR 4:10 ARE CONSIDERED FOR

> D-CHART AND NAVAMSA AS WELL WHICH IS ALSO A D-CHART "

>

> Regards

> Anup

>

>

Ash <kas wrote:

> Dear Anup,

>

> What is the meaning of finding the basic strength in D-Chart.

Just think over it.

> We are adding A+B+C points.

> So if there are 0's in a D chart then they automatically get

reflected in the Basic Strength in the D-Chart WS.

>

> Cheers !!!

> Ash -> http://www.ashtro.ca

>

>

>

>

>

On Behalf Of Anup. M

> Thursday September 13, 2007 12:56 PM

>

> Re: Re: Dear Ash et All :On the

Creation of Universe and Cosmology as applicable to

>

>

> Dear Harjeet ,

>

>

>

> " us shehar mein jao,to itna use kehna,

> baqi na sune koi, sirf tanha usay kehna,

> kuch log safar kay liye mozo'n (suitable) nahi hotay,

> kuch raaste kate nahi tanha,itna use kehna "

>

>

>

> Now tell me,how the quality of a marriage will be, if there is

no zero in SAV by any planet

>

> and three zero in navamsa :) and What about such case...denial

or delay of marriage??

>

>

>

> Regards

>

> Anup

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

harjeet bakshi <harjeet_bakshi wrote:

>

> Dear Ashji,

> whenever one of my teacher used to give me smile.. i used to do

> something wrong in solving a problem... but she would not tell me till

> i asked her.

> so did i do something wrong?

> thanks/regards

> harjeet

>

> , " ashsam73 " <kas@>

> wrote:

> >

> > Dear Harjeet,

> >

> > :-)

> >

> > Cheers !!!

> > Ash -> http://www.ashtro.ca

> >

> > , " Ash " <kas@> wrote:

> > >

> > > Dear Harjeet,

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > > :-)

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > > Cheers !!!

> > >

> > > Ash -> <http://www.ashtro.ca> http://www.ashtro.ca

> > >

> > > _____

> > >

> > >

> > > On Behalf Of

harjeet

> > > bakshi

> > > Thursday September 13, 2007 11:19 AM

> > >

> > > Re: Dear Ash et All :On the

> > Creation of

> > > Universe and Cosmology as applicable to

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > > Resp. Ashji,

> > > more over current antra of rahu samdhari to venus and mars.

> > > mars have more points for 12th compared to 11th.

> > > venus has 20 for 11th and 17 for 12th.

> > > rahu in 9th house triggers 12th and 4th house.

> > > so mars points in ws and rahu's position points to more

expenditure in

> > > current antra.

> > > moreover antras of mars,saturn,moon,mercury and sun have less points

> > > in worsheet for 11th house compared to 12th.

> > > only jupiter and venus have a just little more points in 11th

compared

> > > to 12th.

> > > plus the sav in 12th is more than 11th.

> > > dont we take mean of sav from sun,moon and lagna ?

> > > anything wrong in my thinking?

> > > thanks/regards

> > > harjeet

> > >

> > > astrologyandtiminge

> > > <%40>

> > vents ,

> > > " Ash " <kas@> wrote:

> > > >

> > > > Dear Amit,

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > With this data u have given,

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > 19th May 1986

> > > >

> > > > 12:10 PM

> > > >

> > > > New Delhi

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > Planet

> > > >

> > > > Degrees

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > As

> > > >

> > > > 5 Le 38

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > Su

> > > >

> > > > 5 Ta 14

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > Mo

> > > >

> > > > 2 Vi 38

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > Ma

> > > >

> > > > 27 Sg 51

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > Me

> > > >

> > > > 0 Ta 39

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > Ju

> > > >

> > > > 25 Aq 40

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > Ve

> > > >

> > > > 4 Ge 28

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > SaR

> > > >

> > > > 14 Sc 17

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > Ra

> > > >

> > > > 5 Ar 44

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > Ke

> > > >

> > > > 5 Li 44

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > House

> > > >

> > > > 1

> > > >

> > > > 2

> > > >

> > > > 3

> > > >

> > > > 4

> > > >

> > > > 5

> > > >

> > > > 6

> > > >

> > > > 7

> > > >

> > > > 8

> > > >

> > > > 9

> > > >

> > > > 10

> > > >

> > > > 11

> > > >

> > > > 12

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > Sun

> > > >

> > >

> >

>

<file:///C:\Documents%20and%20Settings\ENagawkar\Desktop\KASMaster.xls#BAV!T

> > > > 7#BAV!T7>

> > > >

> > > > 10

> > > >

> > > > 3

> > > >

> > > > 3

> > > >

> > > > 4

> > > >

> > > > 5

> > > >

> > > > 5

> > > >

> > > > 4

> > > >

> > > > 4

> > > >

> > > > 3

> > > >

> > > > 1

> > > >

> > > > 4

> > > >

> > > > 6

> > > >

> > > > 6

> > > >

> > > > 48

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > Moon

> > > >

> > >

> >

>

<file:///C:\Documents%20and%20Settings\ENagawkar\Desktop\KASMaster.xls#BAV!A

> > > > J7#BAV!AJ7>

> > > >

> > > > 2

> > > >

> > > > 4

> > > >

> > > > 6

> > > >

> > > > 4

> > > >

> > > > 4

> > > >

> > > > 4

> > > >

> > > > 4

> > > >

> > > > 6

> > > >

> > > > 5

> > > >

> > > > 3

> > > >

> > > > 4

> > > >

> > > > 2

> > > >

> > > > 3

> > > >

> > > > 49

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > Mars

> > > >

> > >

> >

>

<file:///C:\Documents%20and%20Settings\ENagawkar\Desktop\KASMaster.xls#BAV!D

> > > > 34#BAV!D34>

> > > >

> > > > 5

> > > >

> > > > 2

> > > >

> > > > 4

> > > >

> > > > 4

> > > >

> > > > 4

> > > >

> > > > 2

> > > >

> > > > 4

> > > >

> > > > 3

> > > >

> > > > 3

> > > >

> > > > 1

> > > >

> > > > 3

> > > >

> > > > 3

> > > >

> > > > 6

> > > >

> > > > 39

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > Mercury

> > > >

> > >

> >

>

<file:///C:\Documents%20and%20Settings\ENagawkar\Desktop\KASMaster.xls#BAV!T

> > > > 34#BAV!T34>

> > > >

> > > > 10

> > > >

> > > > 4

> > > >

> > > > 7

> > > >

> > > > 5

> > > >

> > > > 2

> > > >

> > > > 4

> > > >

> > > > 6

> > > >

> > > > 4

> > > >

> > > > 4

> > > >

> > > > 4

> > > >

> > > > 3

> > > >

> > > > 5

> > > >

> > > > 6

> > > >

> > > > 54

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > Jupiter

> > > >

> > >

> >

>

<file:///C:\Documents%20and%20Settings\ENagawkar\Desktop\KASMaster.xls#BAV!A

> > > > J34#BAV!AJ34>

> > > >

> > > > 7

> > > >

> > > > 4

> > > >

> > > > 4

> > > >

> > > > 5

> > > >

> > > > 4

> > > >

> > > > 4

> > > >

> > > > 6

> > > >

> > > > 5

> > > >

> > > > 7

> > > >

> > > > 4

> > > >

> > > > 5

> > > >

> > > > 4

> > > >

> > > > 4

> > > >

> > > > 56

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > Venus

> > > >

> > >

> >

>

<file:///C:\Documents%20and%20Settings\ENagawkar\Desktop\KASMaster.xls#BAV!G

> > > > 61#BAV!G61>

> > > >

> > > > 11

> > > >

> > > > 5

> > > >

> > > > 6

> > > >

> > > > 6

> > > >

> > > > 4

> > > >

> > > > 4

> > > >

> > > > 4

> > > >

> > > > 3

> > > >

> > > > 5

> > > >

> > > > 5

> > > >

> > > > 2

> > > >

> > > > 4

> > > >

> > > > 4

> > > >

> > > > 52

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > Saturn

> > > >

> > >

> >

>

<file:///C:\Documents%20and%20Settings\ENagawkar\Desktop\KASMaster.xls#BAV!T

> > > > 61#BAV!T61>

> > > >

> > > > 4

> > > >

> > > > 2

> > > >

> > > > 2

> > > >

> > > > 3

> > > >

> > > > 5

> > > >

> > > > 3

> > > >

> > > > 4

> > > >

> > > > 4

> > > >

> > > > 3

> > > >

> > > > 4

> > > >

> > > > 4

> > > >

> > > > 3

> > > >

> > > > 2

> > > >

> > > > 39

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > Totals

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > 24

> > > >

> > > > 32

> > > >

> > > > 31

> > > >

> > > > 28

> > > >

> > > > 26

> > > >

> > > > 32

> > > >

> > > > 29

> > > >

> > > > 30

> > > >

> > > > 22

> > > >

> > > > 25

> > > >

> > > > 27

> > > >

> > > > 31

> > > >

> > > > 337

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > The points in 12th are more than 11th.

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > In any case, let it be.

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > Cheers !!!

> > > >

> > > > Ash -> <http://www.ashtro. <http://www.ashtro.ca> ca>

> > http://www.ashtro.

> > > <http://www.ashtro.ca> ca

> > > >

> > > > _____

> > > >

> > > > astrologyandtiminge

> > > <%40>

> > vents

> > > > [astrologyandtiminge

> > > <%40>

> > vents ]

> > > On Behalf Of planck12

> > > > Wednesday September 12, 2007 7:58 PM

> > > > astrologyandtiminge

> > > <%40>

> > vents

> > > > Re: Dear Ash et All :On the

> > > Creation of

> > > > Universe and Cosmology as applicable to

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > Dear Ash,

> > > > Yes, I completely concur and thats all I wanted to clarify from my

> > > > end. Again before I leave I have another chart if anyone wants

> to use

> > > > from educational stand point.

> > > >

> > > > 19 May 1986

> > > > 12:10pm

> > > > new delhi.

> > > >

> > > > Again i decided to relate the 11/12th house points, in this chart

> > > > again the worksheet decided to give more points in 11th house than

> > > > 12th. But the girl has no savings, he is quite spendrift and have

> > > > numerous expenses as compared to her income.

> > > >

> > > > Also to double check other things, i decided to check other

factors,

> > > > her brillancy for that matter. I think she has two parts in saturn

> > > > degrees as shown with the work sheet. But she is not very

> intelligent,

> > > > again a decent girl who is quite jovial, but she has done a

> > > > certificate course and works in a local bank. As I understand it

> from

> > > > the notes if one part is in saturn then person has odinary

> > > > intelligence and if two he/she has good intelligence. In her

> case she

> > > > is normal like anyone else who has no part in saturns division.

> > > >

> > > > Feel free to check, incase there are other things required, as is

> > > > always the case in terms of details.

> > > >

> > > > 1. The girl is unmarried

> > > > 2. Wheatish complexion

> > > > 3. works in a bank as teller

> > > > 4. From a middle class family

> > > > 5. Has good morals, but tends to be energetic and hyper at times

> > > >

> > > > regards

> > > > Nicked Vish (Amit) I prefer Vish

> > > >

> > > > astrologyandtiminge

> > > > <%40>

> > > vents (AT) (DOT) <vents%40> com,

> > > > " Ash " <kas@> wrote:

> > > > >

> > > > > Dear Amit / Vishy (?),

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > > Everyone is entitled to their own opinion and All the more

> reason we

> > > > should

> > > > > get back to KAS :-)

> > > > >

> > > > > Cheers !!!

> > > > >

> > > > > Ash -> <http://www.ashtro. <http://www.ashtro.

> > <http://www.ashtro.ca>

> > > ca> ca>

> > > http://www.ashtro.

> > > > <http://www.ashtro. <http://www.ashtro.ca> ca> ca

> > > > >

> > > > > _____

> > > > >

> > > > > astrologyandtiminge

> > > > <%40>

> > > vents (AT) (DOT) <vents%40> com

> > > > > [astrologyandtiminge

> > > > <%40>

> > > vents (AT) (DOT) <vents%40> com]

> > > > On Behalf Of

> > > > astroquery12

> > > > > Wednesday September 12, 2007 7:11 PM

> > > > > astrologyandtiminge

> > > > <%40>

> > > vents (AT) (DOT) <vents%40> com

> > > > > Dear Ash et All :On the

> > > Creation of

> > > > > Universe and Cosmology as applicable to Astr

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > > Hi,

> > > > > Hope you are doing well. This is Amit again, had posted under a

> > > > > different name prior but that account did not seem to work and

> > had to

> > > > > create a new id.

> > > > >

> > > > > I have been following the lessons for a while and again I

see many

> > > > > in-consistencies with the system. My intention is not to

refute or

> > > > > accept the system but purely to learn it and see it

> practicality and

> > > > > in the process provide my thoughts in opinions (after all the

> > > > > astrology forum is a free form for discussion). Some of my

> > doubts have

> > > > > cropped up again with the usual, 11th house points vs 12th house

> > > > > points and the actual condition of the charts (again this is

only

> > > > > treating the chart with KAS)as opposed to mixing parashra or k.p

> > etc.

> > > > >

> > > > > On another note, perhaps I can take the liberty to explain

> again on

> > > > > why this happens and hopefully you concur with my points and

> facts.

> > > > > After all astrology will make more meaning if we understand it

> from

> > > > > all angles. You are a computer scientist (a man of science)

> yourself

> > > > > and perhaps this description will make sense and will take a

> purely

> > > > > scientific approach to it:

> > > > >

> > > > > I am sure you are familiar at least on the basic level with

> > Einstein's

> > > > > relativity and the other theory called Quantum Mechanics.

> During the

> > > > > creation of the universe at the point of big bang it is widely

> > > > > believed that there were four fundamental forces in the

universe:

> > > > > Gravity, electromagnetic, weak nuclear and strong nuclear. It is

> > also

> > > > > now very well accepted that relativity explains Gravity very

> > elegantly

> > > > > and that the theory has been tested to the point of calculations

> > > > > pertaning to perhilion of mercury (closest pass to the sun) with

> > > > > accuracy. On the other hand Quantum mechanics has done well in

> > > > > unifying the other three forces of the electromagnetic and

nuclear

> > > > > nature. BUT a BIG TWIST comes into the picture.

> > > > >

> > > > > Realivity claims that events (spacetime continum is 4D) are all

> > > > > associated together and there is no concept of past and

future or

> > > > > present and in simple terms the destiney is already written and

> > > > > nothing can change it, so given the right set of laws one can

> > predict

> > > > > the course of life and the cosmos (relativistic conditions on

> > > > > cosmology)to a complete accurate picture based on fundametal

field

> > > > > equations of einstein. Again Einstein spent much of his life

> > finding a

> > > > > Unified theory that would unify electromagnetics with

gravity BUT

> > > > FAILED.

> > > > >

> > > > > On the other hand QUANTUM MECHANICS claims that nothing in

life is

> > > > > predictable infact everything is a probability. And QM explains

> > atoms

> > > > > etc the world of sub atomic very well (this would include the

> brain)

> > > > > the body etc, after all brain is essential a complex neural

> network

> > > > > working on neurotransmitters signals which are electrical in

> > nature.

> > > > > So it is quite justified that QM is applicable to us as well

> > since we

> > > > > are made of atoms, eletrons etc. But the problem you run into

> > with QM

> > > > > is that nothing is certain and that everything is described as a

> > > > > probablity wave function of something called the scrhorodingers

> > > > > equation. I would want you to refer to the thought experiment

> termed

> > > > > " Schroender's Cat " which is hard for me to explain on this fourm

> > but I

> > > > > am sure you will take the initiative of reading it, in short

every

> > > > > observation made my an reference observer will change the

> course of

> > > > > this obervation directly or indirectly depending on the

> observation

> > > > > being made. Simply put, there is too much random ness existent

> > in this

> > > > > universe to be able to describe anything in any accruancy,

> > especially

> > > > > when it comes to life or the atomic scale.

> > > > >

> > > > > Now applying the above theories to describe astrology, many

of the

> > > > > General predictions we make about the past or even the future at

> > times

> > > > > happen to come true, yet there are many more predictions we made

> > that

> > > > > do not come true at all. Because we are juggling between

> certainity

> > > > > and chaos and that is not the fault or positive aspect of anyone

> > > > > astrological system but rather the law of nature (God if you may

> > call

> > > > > it). You have claimed in your past emails that KAS is very

> accurate

> > > > > however on my sincere application of these principles I have

> > found it

> > > > > smiliar to any other system because the rate of predicition

> does not

> > > > > change much as compared to prashara or k.p or jaimini for that

> > > matter.

> > > > >

> > > > > It is however a different story if we only look at the positive

> > aspect

> > > > > and not realise the shortcomings of any system. My approach is

> > to look

> > > > > at the short comings of this system simply because it might help

> > > > > improve the system in some other way (again thats not job). My

> sole

> > > > > intention for this posting has been to again reiterate on a

> > scientific

> > > > > ground the limitations of astrology and that of human mind and

> > that no

> > > > > matter how hard we try we will be bound by many contraints. You

> > might

> > > > > claim that KAS predictions have come true, but I have applied

> basic

> > > > > principles of many charts some of which have yielded results but

> > again

> > > > > some of them have not yielded the correct results (this I see

> > with an

> > > > > open mind) leading me to believe and again affirm with the

> view that

> > > > > astrology has limitations on what can be predicted. Any when

> we are

> > > > > bound by such limitations then ethically we should take a more

> > > > > cautious approach in predicting in the first place and perhaps a

> > more

> > > > > understanding, less materialistic (making money out of

astrology)

> > > > > attitude in researching things. This would also involve being

> > open to

> > > > > genuine thoughts weather pro or against any system in the

> betterment

> > > > > of knowledge.

> > > > >

> > > > > To end it Einstein once said " God does not play dice with the

> > > > > Universe " on seeing Quatum Mechanics back in the 30s he was

> > > > > diasspointed with QM because he felt there was no free will

> and that

> > > > > there was no such thing as probablity. A famous Quautum

> Theorist (I

> > > > > will let you figure out who) responded by saying " Not only

> does God

> > > > > play dice with Us, He also puts it in places where we cannot

find

> > > it " .

> > > > >

> > > > > :) I hope you see this message not as a threat to your

system but

> > > > > rather as an open ended question to ponder on keeping aside

> > > > > ego,predjuice or any other negative emotions.

> > > > >

> > > > > regards and Best

> > > > > Amit

> > > > >

> > > >

> > >

>

>

> Be a better Heartthrob. Get better relationship answers from

someone who knows.

> Answers - Check it out.

>

>

>

 

> Got a little couch potato?

> Check out fun summer activities for kids.

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dear Ashji,

so the quality suffers but denial cant be said ...

thanks/regards

harjeet

 

, " Ash " <kas wrote:

>

> Dear Hajreet,

>

> The delay calculations are as per the technique taught, i.e. say if

Sa is in

> 5th house in Navamsa so marriage can get delayed etc etc.

>

> 0's in Rasi chart are used to find delay, but 0 in d-chart has not been

> specified by Krushnaji.

>

> 0's in D chart get covered in the basic strength calculation.

>

>

>

> Cheers !!!

>

> Ash -> <http://www.ashtro.ca> http://www.ashtro.ca

>

> _____

>

>

> On Behalf Of harjeet

> bakshi

> Thursday September 13, 2007 1:16 PM

>

> Re: Dear Ash et All :On the

Creation of

> Universe and Cosmology as applicable to

>

>

>

> Dear Anup,

> wah wah!!

> can you please give the birth data so other factors can be seen.

> as per your question if i had to answer without considering other

> factors... i am optimistic.. i would say delayed marriage :).

> remember Krushnaji said.. 50% of effect by planet rest by efforts of

> person. and if there are blessing in chart or from up above..

> thanks/regards

> harjeet

>

> astrologyandtiminge

> <%40>

vents ,

> " Anup. M "

> <dalh_1@> wrote:

> >

> > Dear Harjeet ,

> >

> > " us shehar mein jao,to itna use kehna,

> > baqi na sune koi, sirf tanha usay kehna,

> > kuch log safar kay liye mozo'n (suitable) nahi hotay,

> > kuch raaste kate nahi tanha,itna use kehna "

> >

> > Now tell me,how the quality of a marriage will be, if there is no

> zero in SAV by any planet

> > and three zero in navamsa :) and What about such case...denial or

> delay of marriage??

> >

> > Regards

> > Anup

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> > harjeet bakshi <harjeet_bakshi@> wrote:

> > Dear Ashji,

> > whenever one of my teacher used to give me smile.. i used to do

> > something wrong in solving a problem... but she would not tell me till

> > i asked her.

> > so did i do something wrong?

> > thanks/regards

> > harjeet

> >

> > astrologyandtiminge

> <%40>

vents ,

> " ashsam73 " <kas@>

> > wrote:

> > >

> > > Dear Harjeet,

> > >

> > > :-)

> > >

> > > Cheers !!!

> > > Ash -> http://www.ashtro. <http://www.ashtro.ca> ca

> > >

> > > astrologyandtiminge

> <%40>

vents ,

> " Ash " <kas@> wrote:

> > > >

> > > > Dear Harjeet,

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > :-)

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > Cheers !!!

> > > >

> > > > Ash -> <http://www.ashtro. <http://www.ashtro.ca> ca>

> http://www.ashtro. <http://www.ashtro.ca> ca

> > > >

> > > > _____

> > > >

> > > > astrologyandtiminge

> <%40>

vents

> > > > [astrologyandtiminge

> <%40>

vents ]

> On Behalf Of

> harjeet

> > > > bakshi

> > > > Thursday September 13, 2007 11:19 AM

> > > > astrologyandtiminge

> <%40>

vents

> > > > Re: Dear Ash et All :On the

> > > Creation of

> > > > Universe and Cosmology as applicable to

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > Resp. Ashji,

> > > > more over current antra of rahu samdhari to venus and mars.

> > > > mars have more points for 12th compared to 11th.

> > > > venus has 20 for 11th and 17 for 12th.

> > > > rahu in 9th house triggers 12th and 4th house.

> > > > so mars points in ws and rahu's position points to more

> expenditure in

> > > > current antra.

> > > > moreover antras of mars,saturn,moon,mercury and sun have less

points

> > > > in worsheet for 11th house compared to 12th.

> > > > only jupiter and venus have a just little more points in 11th

> compared

> > > > to 12th.

> > > > plus the sav in 12th is more than 11th.

> > > > dont we take mean of sav from sun,moon and lagna ?

> > > > anything wrong in my thinking?

> > > > thanks/regards

> > > > harjeet

> > > >

> > > > astrologyandtiminge

> > > > <%40>

> > > vents (AT) (DOT) <vents%40> com,

> > > > " Ash " <kas@> wrote:

> > > > >

> > > > > Dear Amit,

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > > With this data u have given,

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > > 19th May 1986

> > > > >

> > > > > 12:10 PM

> > > > >

> > > > > New Delhi

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > > Planet

> > > > >

> > > > > Degrees

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > > As

> > > > >

> > > > > 5 Le 38

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > > Su

> > > > >

> > > > > 5 Ta 14

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > > Mo

> > > > >

> > > > > 2 Vi 38

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > > Ma

> > > > >

> > > > > 27 Sg 51

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > > Me

> > > > >

> > > > > 0 Ta 39

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > > Ju

> > > > >

> > > > > 25 Aq 40

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > > Ve

> > > > >

> > > > > 4 Ge 28

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > > SaR

> > > > >

> > > > > 14 Sc 17

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > > Ra

> > > > >

> > > > > 5 Ar 44

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > > Ke

> > > > >

> > > > > 5 Li 44

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > > House

> > > > >

> > > > > 1

> > > > >

> > > > > 2

> > > > >

> > > > > 3

> > > > >

> > > > > 4

> > > > >

> > > > > 5

> > > > >

> > > > > 6

> > > > >

> > > > > 7

> > > > >

> > > > > 8

> > > > >

> > > > > 9

> > > > >

> > > > > 10

> > > > >

> > > > > 11

> > > > >

> > > > > 12

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > > Sun

> > > > >

> > > >

> > >

> >

>

<file:///C:\Documents%20and%20Settings\ENagawkar\Desktop\KASMaster.xls#BAV!T

> > > > > 7#BAV!T7>

> > > > >

> > > > > 10

> > > > >

> > > > > 3

> > > > >

> > > > > 3

> > > > >

> > > > > 4

> > > > >

> > > > > 5

> > > > >

> > > > > 5

> > > > >

> > > > > 4

> > > > >

> > > > > 4

> > > > >

> > > > > 3

> > > > >

> > > > > 1

> > > > >

> > > > > 4

> > > > >

> > > > > 6

> > > > >

> > > > > 6

> > > > >

> > > > > 48

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > > Moon

> > > > >

> > > >

> > >

> >

>

<file:///C:\Documents%20and%20Settings\ENagawkar\Desktop\KASMaster.xls#BAV!A

> > > > > J7#BAV!AJ7>

> > > > >

> > > > > 2

> > > > >

> > > > > 4

> > > > >

> > > > > 6

> > > > >

> > > > > 4

> > > > >

> > > > > 4

> > > > >

> > > > > 4

> > > > >

> > > > > 4

> > > > >

> > > > > 6

> > > > >

> > > > > 5

> > > > >

> > > > > 3

> > > > >

> > > > > 4

> > > > >

> > > > > 2

> > > > >

> > > > > 3

> > > > >

> > > > > 49

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > > Mars

> > > > >

> > > >

> > >

> >

>

<file:///C:\Documents%20and%20Settings\ENagawkar\Desktop\KASMaster.xls#BAV!D

> > > > > 34#BAV!D34>

> > > > >

> > > > > 5

> > > > >

> > > > > 2

> > > > >

> > > > > 4

> > > > >

> > > > > 4

> > > > >

> > > > > 4

> > > > >

> > > > > 2

> > > > >

> > > > > 4

> > > > >

> > > > > 3

> > > > >

> > > > > 3

> > > > >

> > > > > 1

> > > > >

> > > > > 3

> > > > >

> > > > > 3

> > > > >

> > > > > 6

> > > > >

> > > > > 39

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > > Mercury

> > > > >

> > > >

> > >

> >

>

<file:///C:\Documents%20and%20Settings\ENagawkar\Desktop\KASMaster.xls#BAV!T

> > > > > 34#BAV!T34>

> > > > >

> > > > > 10

> > > > >

> > > > > 4

> > > > >

> > > > > 7

> > > > >

> > > > > 5

> > > > >

> > > > > 2

> > > > >

> > > > > 4

> > > > >

> > > > > 6

> > > > >

> > > > > 4

> > > > >

> > > > > 4

> > > > >

> > > > > 4

> > > > >

> > > > > 3

> > > > >

> > > > > 5

> > > > >

> > > > > 6

> > > > >

> > > > > 54

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > > Jupiter

> > > > >

> > > >

> > >

> >

>

<file:///C:\Documents%20and%20Settings\ENagawkar\Desktop\KASMaster.xls#BAV!A

> > > > > J34#BAV!AJ34>

> > > > >

> > > > > 7

> > > > >

> > > > > 4

> > > > >

> > > > > 4

> > > > >

> > > > > 5

> > > > >

> > > > > 4

> > > > >

> > > > > 4

> > > > >

> > > > > 6

> > > > >

> > > > > 5

> > > > >

> > > > > 7

> > > > >

> > > > > 4

> > > > >

> > > > > 5

> > > > >

> > > > > 4

> > > > >

> > > > > 4

> > > > >

> > > > > 56

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > > Venus

> > > > >

> > > >

> > >

> >

>

<file:///C:\Documents%20and%20Settings\ENagawkar\Desktop\KASMaster.xls#BAV!G

> > > > > 61#BAV!G61>

> > > > >

> > > > > 11

> > > > >

> > > > > 5

> > > > >

> > > > > 6

> > > > >

> > > > > 6

> > > > >

> > > > > 4

> > > > >

> > > > > 4

> > > > >

> > > > > 4

> > > > >

> > > > > 3

> > > > >

> > > > > 5

> > > > >

> > > > > 5

> > > > >

> > > > > 2

> > > > >

> > > > > 4

> > > > >

> > > > > 4

> > > > >

> > > > > 52

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > > Saturn

> > > > >

> > > >

> > >

> >

>

<file:///C:\Documents%20and%20Settings\ENagawkar\Desktop\KASMaster.xls#BAV!T

> > > > > 61#BAV!T61>

> > > > >

> > > > > 4

> > > > >

> > > > > 2

> > > > >

> > > > > 2

> > > > >

> > > > > 3

> > > > >

> > > > > 5

> > > > >

> > > > > 3

> > > > >

> > > > > 4

> > > > >

> > > > > 4

> > > > >

> > > > > 3

> > > > >

> > > > > 4

> > > > >

> > > > > 4

> > > > >

> > > > > 3

> > > > >

> > > > > 2

> > > > >

> > > > > 39

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > > Totals

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > > 24

> > > > >

> > > > > 32

> > > > >

> > > > > 31

> > > > >

> > > > > 28

> > > > >

> > > > > 26

> > > > >

> > > > > 32

> > > > >

> > > > > 29

> > > > >

> > > > > 30

> > > > >

> > > > > 22

> > > > >

> > > > > 25

> > > > >

> > > > > 27

> > > > >

> > > > > 31

> > > > >

> > > > > 337

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > > The points in 12th are more than 11th.

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > > In any case, let it be.

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > > Cheers !!!

> > > > >

> > > > > Ash -> <http://www.ashtro. <http://www.ashtro.

> <http://www.ashtro.ca> ca> ca>

> > > http://www.ashtro.

> > > > <http://www.ashtro. <http://www.ashtro.ca> ca> ca

> > > > >

> > > > > _____

> > > > >

> > > > > astrologyandtiminge

> > > > <%40>

> > > vents (AT) (DOT) <vents%40> com

> > > > > [astrologyandtiminge

> > > > <%40>

> > > vents (AT) (DOT) <vents%40> com]

> > > > On Behalf Of planck12

> > > > > Wednesday September 12, 2007 7:58 PM

> > > > > astrologyandtiminge

> > > > <%40>

> > > vents (AT) (DOT) <vents%40> com

> > > > > Re: Dear Ash et All :On the

> > > > Creation of

> > > > > Universe and Cosmology as applicable to

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > > Dear Ash,

> > > > > Yes, I completely concur and thats all I wanted to clarify

from my

> > > > > end. Again before I leave I have another chart if anyone wants

> > to use

> > > > > from educational stand point.

> > > > >

> > > > > 19 May 1986

> > > > > 12:10pm

> > > > > new delhi.

> > > > >

> > > > > Again i decided to relate the 11/12th house points, in this

chart

> > > > > again the worksheet decided to give more points in 11th

house than

> > > > > 12th. But the girl has no savings, he is quite spendrift and

have

> > > > > numerous expenses as compared to her income.

> > > > >

> > > > > Also to double check other things, i decided to check other

> factors,

> > > > > her brillancy for that matter. I think she has two parts in

saturn

> > > > > degrees as shown with the work sheet. But she is not very

> > intelligent,

> > > > > again a decent girl who is quite jovial, but she has done a

> > > > > certificate course and works in a local bank. As I understand it

> > from

> > > > > the notes if one part is in saturn then person has odinary

> > > > > intelligence and if two he/she has good intelligence. In her

> > case she

> > > > > is normal like anyone else who has no part in saturns division.

> > > > >

> > > > > Feel free to check, incase there are other things required,

as is

> > > > > always the case in terms of details.

> > > > >

> > > > > 1. The girl is unmarried

> > > > > 2. Wheatish complexion

> > > > > 3. works in a bank as teller

> > > > > 4. From a middle class family

> > > > > 5. Has good morals, but tends to be energetic and hyper at

times

> > > > >

> > > > > regards

> > > > > Nicked Vish (Amit) I prefer Vish

> > > > >

> > > > > astrologyandtiminge

> > > > > <%40>

> > > > vents (AT) (DOT) <vents%40> com,

> > > > > " Ash " <kas@> wrote:

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Dear Amit / Vishy (?),

> > > > > >

> > > > > >

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Everyone is entitled to their own opinion and All the more

> > reason we

> > > > > should

> > > > > > get back to KAS :-)

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Cheers !!!

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Ash -> <http://www.ashtro. <http://www.ashtro.

> > > <http://www.ashtro. <http://www.ashtro.ca> ca>

> > > > ca> ca>

> > > > http://www.ashtro.

> > > > > <http://www.ashtro. <http://www.ashtro.

<http://www.ashtro.ca> ca>

> ca> ca

> > > > > >

> > > > > > _____

> > > > > >

> > > > > > astrologyandtiminge

> > > > > <%40>

> > > > vents (AT) (DOT) <vents%40> com

> > > > > > [astrologyandtiminge

> > > > > <%40>

> > > > vents (AT) (DOT) <vents%40> com]

> > > > > On Behalf Of

> > > > > astroquery12

> > > > > > Wednesday September 12, 2007 7:11 PM

> > > > > > astrologyandtiminge

> > > > > <%40>

> > > > vents (AT) (DOT) <vents%40> com

> > > > > > Dear Ash et All :On the

> > > > Creation of

> > > > > > Universe and Cosmology as applicable to Astr

> > > > > >

> > > > > >

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Hi,

> > > > > > Hope you are doing well. This is Amit again, had posted

under a

> > > > > > different name prior but that account did not seem to work and

> > > had to

> > > > > > create a new id.

> > > > > >

> > > > > > I have been following the lessons for a while and again I

> see many

> > > > > > in-consistencies with the system. My intention is not to

> refute or

> > > > > > accept the system but purely to learn it and see it

> > practicality and

> > > > > > in the process provide my thoughts in opinions (after all the

> > > > > > astrology forum is a free form for discussion). Some of my

> > > doubts have

> > > > > > cropped up again with the usual, 11th house points vs 12th

house

> > > > > > points and the actual condition of the charts (again this is

> only

> > > > > > treating the chart with KAS)as opposed to mixing parashra

or k.p

> > > etc.

> > > > > >

> > > > > > On another note, perhaps I can take the liberty to explain

> > again on

> > > > > > why this happens and hopefully you concur with my points and

> > facts.

> > > > > > After all astrology will make more meaning if we understand it

> > from

> > > > > > all angles. You are a computer scientist (a man of science)

> > yourself

> > > > > > and perhaps this description will make sense and will take a

> > purely

> > > > > > scientific approach to it:

> > > > > >

> > > > > > I am sure you are familiar at least on the basic level with

> > > Einstein's

> > > > > > relativity and the other theory called Quantum Mechanics.

> > During the

> > > > > > creation of the universe at the point of big bang it is widely

> > > > > > believed that there were four fundamental forces in the

> universe:

> > > > > > Gravity, electromagnetic, weak nuclear and strong nuclear.

It is

> > > also

> > > > > > now very well accepted that relativity explains Gravity very

> > > elegantly

> > > > > > and that the theory has been tested to the point of

calculations

> > > > > > pertaning to perhilion of mercury (closest pass to the

sun) with

> > > > > > accuracy. On the other hand Quantum mechanics has done well in

> > > > > > unifying the other three forces of the electromagnetic and

> nuclear

> > > > > > nature. BUT a BIG TWIST comes into the picture.

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Realivity claims that events (spacetime continum is 4D)

are all

> > > > > > associated together and there is no concept of past and

> future or

> > > > > > present and in simple terms the destiney is already

written and

> > > > > > nothing can change it, so given the right set of laws one can

> > > predict

> > > > > > the course of life and the cosmos (relativistic conditions on

> > > > > > cosmology)to a complete accurate picture based on fundametal

> field

> > > > > > equations of einstein. Again Einstein spent much of his life

> > > finding a

> > > > > > Unified theory that would unify electromagnetics with

> gravity BUT

> > > > > FAILED.

> > > > > >

> > > > > > On the other hand QUANTUM MECHANICS claims that nothing in

> life is

> > > > > > predictable infact everything is a probability. And QM

explains

> > > atoms

> > > > > > etc the world of sub atomic very well (this would include the

> > brain)

> > > > > > the body etc, after all brain is essential a complex neural

> > network

> > > > > > working on neurotransmitters signals which are electrical in

> > > nature.

> > > > > > So it is quite justified that QM is applicable to us as well

> > > since we

> > > > > > are made of atoms, eletrons etc. But the problem you run into

> > > with QM

> > > > > > is that nothing is certain and that everything is

described as a

> > > > > > probablity wave function of something called the

scrhorodingers

> > > > > > equation. I would want you to refer to the thought experiment

> > termed

> > > > > > " Schroender's Cat " which is hard for me to explain on this

fourm

> > > but I

> > > > > > am sure you will take the initiative of reading it, in short

> every

> > > > > > observation made my an reference observer will change the

> > course of

> > > > > > this obervation directly or indirectly depending on the

> > observation

> > > > > > being made. Simply put, there is too much random ness existent

> > > in this

> > > > > > universe to be able to describe anything in any accruancy,

> > > especially

> > > > > > when it comes to life or the atomic scale.

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Now applying the above theories to describe astrology, many

> of the

> > > > > > General predictions we make about the past or even the

future at

> > > times

> > > > > > happen to come true, yet there are many more predictions

we made

> > > that

> > > > > > do not come true at all. Because we are juggling between

> > certainity

> > > > > > and chaos and that is not the fault or positive aspect of

anyone

> > > > > > astrological system but rather the law of nature (God if

you may

> > > call

> > > > > > it). You have claimed in your past emails that KAS is very

> > accurate

> > > > > > however on my sincere application of these principles I have

> > > found it

> > > > > > smiliar to any other system because the rate of predicition

> > does not

> > > > > > change much as compared to prashara or k.p or jaimini for that

> > > > matter.

> > > > > >

> > > > > > It is however a different story if we only look at the

positive

> > > aspect

> > > > > > and not realise the shortcomings of any system. My approach is

> > > to look

> > > > > > at the short comings of this system simply because it

might help

> > > > > > improve the system in some other way (again thats not job). My

> > sole

> > > > > > intention for this posting has been to again reiterate on a

> > > scientific

> > > > > > ground the limitations of astrology and that of human mind and

> > > that no

> > > > > > matter how hard we try we will be bound by many

contraints. You

> > > might

> > > > > > claim that KAS predictions have come true, but I have applied

> > basic

> > > > > > principles of many charts some of which have yielded

results but

> > > again

> > > > > > some of them have not yielded the correct results (this I see

> > > with an

> > > > > > open mind) leading me to believe and again affirm with the

> > view that

> > > > > > astrology has limitations on what can be predicted. Any when

> > we are

> > > > > > bound by such limitations then ethically we should take a more

> > > > > > cautious approach in predicting in the first place and

perhaps a

> > > more

> > > > > > understanding, less materialistic (making money out of

> astrology)

> > > > > > attitude in researching things. This would also involve being

> > > open to

> > > > > > genuine thoughts weather pro or against any system in the

> > betterment

> > > > > > of knowledge.

> > > > > >

> > > > > > To end it Einstein once said " God does not play dice with the

> > > > > > Universe " on seeing Quatum Mechanics back in the 30s he was

> > > > > > diasspointed with QM because he felt there was no free will

> > and that

> > > > > > there was no such thing as probablity. A famous Quautum

> > Theorist (I

> > > > > > will let you figure out who) responded by saying " Not only

> > does God

> > > > > > play dice with Us, He also puts it in places where we cannot

> find

> > > > it " .

> > > > > >

> > > > > > :) I hope you see this message not as a threat to your

> system but

> > > > > > rather as an open ended question to ponder on keeping aside

> > > > > > ego,predjuice or any other negative emotions.

> > > > > >

> > > > > > regards and Best

> > > > > > Amit

> > > > > >

> > > > >

> > > >

> > >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> > Be a better Heartthrob. Get better relationship answers from someone

> who knows.

> > Answers - Check it out.

> >

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dear Harjeet, Only one factor can not be taken as denial for a marriage. You also know this,and that too in D chart as Ash told us.I think we can consider this for quality of the marrige also besides other factors. But we have to follow our teacher and Guruji what we being taught. May be in the coming time as Krushnaji promised us,shed some light on this too. Regards Anup harjeet bakshi <harjeet_bakshi wrote: Dear A & A,so do we take it as denial ?thanks/regardsharjeet , "Anup. M"<dalh_1 wrote:>> Dear Ash nd Harjeet,> > Thanks Ash...i cld understand as you are teaching us step by step.> Besides that Harjeet is my classmate and naughty, so wanted to> divert his attention by some way:)> > Btw, here is one of the illustration by you in some archive...> > " YOGAS, OR SAY SARVASHTAKAVARGA IS CASTED IN ALL D CHARTS SO IT> MEANS THAT PLANETS RELATION W.R.T EACH OTHER OR YOGAS ARE CONSIDERED> AND THAT POWER I.E. WHEN WE FIND THE BASIC STRENGTH THEN THAT GIVES> THE POWER OF 7 PLANETS IN 12 HOUSES IN NAVAMSA ONLY, SO

HERE IT> NAVAMSA IS A D-CHART AND LIKE ALL D-CHART WHEN FINDING POWER U ONLY> CHECK THE BASIC STRENGTH AND NO ASPECTS OR 4:10 ARE CONSIDERED FOR> D-CHART AND NAVAMSA AS WELL WHICH IS ALSO A D-CHART"> > Regards> Anup> > > > > > > > > Ash <kas wrote:> Dear Anup,> > What is the meaning of finding the basic strength in D-Chart. Just think over it. > We are adding A+B+C points. > So if there are 0's in a D chart then they automatically getreflected in the Basic Strength in the D-Chart WS.> > Cheers !!!> Ash -> http://www.ashtro.ca> > > > > [ ] On Behalf Of Anup. M> Thursday September 13, 2007 12:56 PM> > Re: Re: Dear Ash et All :On theCreation of Universe and Cosmology as applicable to> > > Dear Harjeet ,> > > > "us shehar mein jao,to itna use kehna,> baqi na sune koi, sirf tanha usay kehna,> kuch log safar kay liye mozo'n (suitable) nahi hotay,> kuch raaste kate nahi tanha,itna use kehna"> > > > Now tell me,how the quality of a marriage will be, if there isno zero in SAV by any planet > > and three zero in navamsa :) and What about such case...denialor delay of marriage??> >

> > Regards> > Anup> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > harjeet bakshi <harjeet_bakshi wrote:> > Dear Ashji,> whenever one of my teacher used to give me smile.. i used to do> something wrong in solving a problem... but she would not tell me till> i asked her.> so did i do something wrong?> thanks/regards> harjeet> > , "ashsam73" <kas@>> wrote:> >> > Dear Harjeet,> > > > :-)> > > > Cheers !!!> > Ash -> http://www.ashtro.ca> > > > , "Ash" <kas@> wrote:> > >> > > Dear Harjeet,> > > > > > > > > > > > :-) > > > > > > > > > > > > Cheers !!!> > > > > > Ash -> <http://www.ashtro.ca> http://www.ashtro.ca> > > > > > _____ > > > > > > > > > On Behalf Ofharjeet> > > bakshi> > > Thursday September 13, 2007 11:19

AM> > > > > > Re: Dear Ash et All :On the> > Creation of> > > Universe and Cosmology as applicable to> > > > > > > > > > > > Resp. Ashji,> > > more over current antra of rahu samdhari to venus and mars.> > > mars have more points for 12th compared to 11th.> > > venus has 20 for 11th and 17 for 12th.> > > rahu in 9th house triggers 12th and 4th house.> > > so mars points in ws and rahu's position points to moreexpenditure in> > > current antra.> > > moreover antras of mars,saturn,moon,mercury and sun have less points> > > in worsheet for 11th house compared to 12th.> > > only jupiter and venus

have a just little more points in 11thcompared> > > to 12th.> > > plus the sav in 12th is more than 11th.> > > dont we take mean of sav from sun,moon and lagna ?> > > anything wrong in my thinking?> > > thanks/regards> > > harjeet> > > > > > astrologyandtiminge> > > <%40>> > vents ,> > > "Ash" <kas@> wrote:> > > >> > > > Dear Amit,> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > With this data u have given,> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 19th May 1986> > > > > > > > 12:10 PM> > > > > > >

> New Delhi> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Planet> > > > > > > > Degrees> > > > > > > > > > > > As> > > > > > > > 5 Le 38> > > > > > > > > > > > Su> > > > > > > > 5 Ta 14> > > > > > > > > > > > Mo> > > > > > > > 2 Vi 38> > > > > > > > > > > > Ma> > > > > > > > 27 Sg 51> > > > > > > > > > > > Me> > > > > > > > 0 Ta 39> > > > > > > > > > > > Ju> > > >

> > > > 25 Aq 40> > > > > > > > > > > > Ve> > > > > > > > 4 Ge 28> > > > > > > > > > > > SaR> > > > > > > > 14 Sc 17> > > > > > > > > > > > Ra> > > > > > > > 5 Ar 44> > > > > > > > > > > > Ke> > > > > > > > 5 Li 44> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > House> > > > > > > > 1> > > > > > > > 2> > > > > > > > 3> > > > > > > > 4> > >

> > > > > 5> > > > > > > > 6> > > > > > > > 7> > > > > > > > 8> > > > > > > > 9> > > > > > > > 10> > > > > > > > 11> > > > > > > > 12> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Sun> > > >> > >> >><file:///C:\Documents%20and%20Settings\ENagawkar\Desktop\KASMaster.xls#BAV!T> > > > 7#BAV!T7> > > > > > > > > 10> > > > > > > > 3> > > > > > > > 3> > > > > > > > 4> > > > > > > > 5>

> > > > > > > 5> > > > > > > > 4> > > > > > > > 4> > > > > > > > 3> > > > > > > > 1> > > > > > > > 4> > > > > > > > 6> > > > > > > > 6> > > > > > > > 48> > > > > > > > > > > > Moon> > > >> > >> >><file:///C:\Documents%20and%20Settings\ENagawkar\Desktop\KASMaster.xls#BAV!A> > > > J7#BAV!AJ7> > > > > > > > > 2> > > > > > > > 4> > > > > > > > 6> > > > > > > > 4> > > > > > > >

4> > > > > > > > 4> > > > > > > > 4> > > > > > > > 6> > > > > > > > 5> > > > > > > > 3> > > > > > > > 4> > > > > > > > 2> > > > > > > > 3> > > > > > > > 49> > > > > > > > > > > > Mars> > > >> > >> >><file:///C:\Documents%20and%20Settings\ENagawkar\Desktop\KASMaster.xls#BAV!D> > > > 34#BAV!D34> > > > > > > > > 5> > > > > > > > 2> > > > > > > > 4> > > > > > > > 4> > > > > >

> > 4> > > > > > > > 2> > > > > > > > 4> > > > > > > > 3> > > > > > > > 3> > > > > > > > 1> > > > > > > > 3> > > > > > > > 3> > > > > > > > 6> > > > > > > > 39> > > > > > > > > > > > Mercury> > > >> > >> >><file:///C:\Documents%20and%20Settings\ENagawkar\Desktop\KASMaster.xls#BAV!T> > > > 34#BAV!T34> > > > > > > > > 10> > > > > > > > 4> > > > > > > > 7> > > > > > > > 5> > > >

> > > > 2> > > > > > > > 4> > > > > > > > 6> > > > > > > > 4> > > > > > > > 4> > > > > > > > 4> > > > > > > > 3> > > > > > > > 5> > > > > > > > 6> > > > > > > > 54> > > > > > > > > > > > Jupiter> > > >> > >> >><file:///C:\Documents%20and%20Settings\ENagawkar\Desktop\KASMaster.xls#BAV!A> > > > J34#BAV!AJ34> > > > > > > > > 7> > > > > > > > 4> > > > > > > > 4> > > > > > > > 5>

> > > > > > > 4> > > > > > > > 4> > > > > > > > 6> > > > > > > > 5> > > > > > > > 7> > > > > > > > 4> > > > > > > > 5> > > > > > > > 4> > > > > > > > 4> > > > > > > > 56> > > > > > > > > > > > Venus> > > >> > >> >><file:///C:\Documents%20and%20Settings\ENagawkar\Desktop\KASMaster.xls#BAV!G> > > > 61#BAV!G61> > > > > > > > > 11> > > > > > > > 5> > > > > > > > 6> > > > > > >

> 6> > > > > > > > 4> > > > > > > > 4> > > > > > > > 4> > > > > > > > 3> > > > > > > > 5> > > > > > > > 5> > > > > > > > 2> > > > > > > > 4> > > > > > > > 4> > > > > > > > 52> > > > > > > > > > > > Saturn> > > >> > >> >><file:///C:\Documents%20and%20Settings\ENagawkar\Desktop\KASMaster.xls#BAV!T> > > > 61#BAV!T61> > > > > > > > > 4> > > > > > > > 2> > > > > > > > 2> > > >

> > > > 3> > > > > > > > 5> > > > > > > > 3> > > > > > > > 4> > > > > > > > 4> > > > > > > > 3> > > > > > > > 4> > > > > > > > 4> > > > > > > > 3> > > > > > > > 2> > > > > > > > 39> > > > > > > > > > > > Totals> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 24> > > > > > > > 32> > > > > > > > 31> > > > > > > > 28> > > > > > > > 26> > > > > > > > 32> > > > > > >

> 29> > > > > > > > 30> > > > > > > > 22> > > > > > > > 25> > > > > > > > 27> > > > > > > > 31> > > > > > > > 337> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The points in 12th are more than 11th.> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > In any case, let it be.> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cheers !!!> > > > > > > > Ash -> <http://www.ashtro. <http://www.ashtro.ca> ca>> > http://www.ashtro.> >

> <http://www.ashtro.ca> ca> > > > > > > > _____ > > > > > > > > astrologyandtiminge> > > <%40>> > vents > > > > [astrologyandtiminge> > > <%40>> > vents ]> > > On Behalf Of planck12> > > > Wednesday September 12, 2007 7:58 PM> > > > astrologyandtiminge> > > <%40>> > vents > > > > Subject:

Re: Dear Ash et All :On the> > > Creation of> > > > Universe and Cosmology as applicable to> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Ash, > > > > Yes, I completely concur and thats all I wanted to clarify from my> > > > end. Again before I leave I have another chart if anyone wants> to use> > > > from educational stand point. > > > > > > > > 19 May 1986> > > > 12:10pm > > > > new delhi. > > > > > > > > Again i decided to relate the 11/12th house points, in this chart> > > > again the worksheet decided to give more points in 11th house than> > > > 12th. But the girl has no savings, he is quite spendrift and have> > > > numerous expenses as compared to her

income. > > > > > > > > Also to double check other things, i decided to check otherfactors,> > > > her brillancy for that matter. I think she has two parts in saturn> > > > degrees as shown with the work sheet. But she is not very> intelligent,> > > > again a decent girl who is quite jovial, but she has done a> > > > certificate course and works in a local bank. As I understand it> from> > > > the notes if one part is in saturn then person has odinary> > > > intelligence and if two he/she has good intelligence. In her> case she> > > > is normal like anyone else who has no part in saturns division. > > > > > > > > Feel free to check, incase there are other things required, as is> > > > always the case in terms of details. > > > > > >

> > 1. The girl is unmarried> > > > 2. Wheatish complexion > > > > 3. works in a bank as teller > > > > 4. From a middle class family> > > > 5. Has good morals, but tends to be energetic and hyper at times > > > > > > > > regards> > > > Nicked Vish (Amit) I prefer Vish > > > > > > > > astrologyandtiminge> > > > <%40>> > > vents (AT) (DOT) <vents%40> com,> > > > "Ash" <kas@> wrote:> > > > >> > > > > Dear Amit / Vishy (?),> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Everyone is entitled to their own opinion and All the more> reason we> > >

> should> > > > > get back to KAS :-)> > > > > > > > > > Cheers !!!> > > > > > > > > > Ash -> <http://www.ashtro. <http://www.ashtro.> > <http://www.ashtro.ca>> > > ca> ca>> > > http://www.ashtro.> > > > <http://www.ashtro. <http://www.ashtro.ca> ca> ca> > > > > > > > > > _____ > > > > > > > > > > astrologyandtiminge> > > > <%40>> > > vents (AT) (DOT) <vents%40>

com> > > > > [astrologyandtiminge> > > > <%40>> > > vents (AT) (DOT) <vents%40> com]> > > > On Behalf Of> > > > astroquery12> > > > > Wednesday September 12, 2007 7:11 PM> > > > > astrologyandtiminge> > > > <%40>> > > vents (AT) (DOT) <vents%40> com> > > > > Dear Ash et All :On the> > > Creation of> > > > > Universe and Cosmology as applicable to Astr> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > Hope you

are doing well. This is Amit again, had posted under a> > > > > different name prior but that account did not seem to work and> > had to> > > > > create a new id. > > > > > > > > > > I have been following the lessons for a while and again Isee many> > > > > in-consistencies with the system. My intention is not torefute or> > > > > accept the system but purely to learn it and see it> practicality and> > > > > in the process provide my thoughts in opinions (after all the> > > > > astrology forum is a free form for discussion). Some of my> > doubts have> > > > > cropped up again with the usual, 11th house points vs 12th house> > > > > points and the actual condition of the charts (again this isonly> > > > > treating the chart with

KAS)as opposed to mixing parashra or k.p> > etc. > > > > > > > > > > On another note, perhaps I can take the liberty to explain> again on> > > > > why this happens and hopefully you concur with my points and> facts.> > > > > After all astrology will make more meaning if we understand it> from> > > > > all angles. You are a computer scientist (a man of science)> yourself> > > > > and perhaps this description will make sense and will take a> purely> > > > > scientific approach to it: > > > > > > > > > > I am sure you are familiar at least on the basic level with> > Einstein's> > > > > relativity and the other theory called Quantum Mechanics.> During the> > > > > creation of the universe at the point of big

bang it is widely> > > > > believed that there were four fundamental forces in theuniverse:> > > > > Gravity, electromagnetic, weak nuclear and strong nuclear. It is> > also> > > > > now very well accepted that relativity explains Gravity very> > elegantly> > > > > and that the theory has been tested to the point of calculations> > > > > pertaning to perhilion of mercury (closest pass to the sun) with> > > > > accuracy. On the other hand Quantum mechanics has done well in> > > > > unifying the other three forces of the electromagnetic andnuclear> > > > > nature. BUT a BIG TWIST comes into the picture. > > > > > > > > > > Realivity claims that events (spacetime continum is 4D) are all> > > > > associated together and there is no concept of

past andfuture or> > > > > present and in simple terms the destiney is already written and> > > > > nothing can change it, so given the right set of laws one can> > predict> > > > > the course of life and the cosmos (relativistic conditions on> > > > > cosmology)to a complete accurate picture based on fundametalfield> > > > > equations of einstein. Again Einstein spent much of his life> > finding a> > > > > Unified theory that would unify electromagnetics withgravity BUT> > > > FAILED. > > > > > > > > > > On the other hand QUANTUM MECHANICS claims that nothing inlife is> > > > > predictable infact everything is a probability. And QM explains> > atoms> > > > > etc the world of sub atomic very well (this would include

the> brain)> > > > > the body etc, after all brain is essential a complex neural> network> > > > > working on neurotransmitters signals which are electrical in> > nature. > > > > > So it is quite justified that QM is applicable to us as well> > since we> > > > > are made of atoms, eletrons etc. But the problem you run into> > with QM> > > > > is that nothing is certain and that everything is described as a> > > > > probablity wave function of something called the scrhorodingers> > > > > equation. I would want you to refer to the thought experiment> termed> > > > > "Schroender's Cat" which is hard for me to explain on this fourm> > but I> > > > > am sure you will take the initiative of reading it, in shortevery> > > >

> observation made my an reference observer will change the> course of> > > > > this obervation directly or indirectly depending on the> observation> > > > > being made. Simply put, there is too much random ness existent> > in this> > > > > universe to be able to describe anything in any accruancy,> > especially> > > > > when it comes to life or the atomic scale. > > > > > > > > > > Now applying the above theories to describe astrology, manyof the> > > > > General predictions we make about the past or even the future at> > times> > > > > happen to come true, yet there are many more predictions we made> > that> > > > > do not come true at all. Because we are juggling between> certainity> > > > > and chaos and that is not

the fault or positive aspect of anyone> > > > > astrological system but rather the law of nature (God if you may> > call> > > > > it). You have claimed in your past emails that KAS is very> accurate> > > > > however on my sincere application of these principles I have> > found it> > > > > smiliar to any other system because the rate of predicition> does not> > > > > change much as compared to prashara or k.p or jaimini for that> > > matter. > > > > > > > > > > It is however a different story if we only look at the positive> > aspect> > > > > and not realise the shortcomings of any system. My approach is> > to look> > > > > at the short comings of this system simply because it might help> > > > > improve the system in

some other way (again thats not job). My> sole> > > > > intention for this posting has been to again reiterate on a> > scientific> > > > > ground the limitations of astrology and that of human mind and> > that no> > > > > matter how hard we try we will be bound by many contraints. You> > might> > > > > claim that KAS predictions have come true, but I have applied> basic> > > > > principles of many charts some of which have yielded results but> > again> > > > > some of them have not yielded the correct results (this I see> > with an> > > > > open mind) leading me to believe and again affirm with the> view that> > > > > astrology has limitations on what can be predicted. Any when> we are> > > > > bound by such limitations then

ethically we should take a more> > > > > cautious approach in predicting in the first place and perhaps a> > more> > > > > understanding, less materialistic (making money out ofastrology)> > > > > attitude in researching things. This would also involve being> > open to> > > > > genuine thoughts weather pro or against any system in the> betterment> > > > > of knowledge. > > > > > > > > > > To end it Einstein once said "God does not play dice with the> > > > > Universe" on seeing Quatum Mechanics back in the 30s he was> > > > > diasspointed with QM because he felt there was no free will> and that> > > > > there was no such thing as probablity. A famous Quautum> Theorist (I> > > > > will let you figure out who) responded by

saying "Not only> does God> > > > > play dice with Us, He also puts it in places where we cannotfind> > > it". > > > > > > > > > > :) I hope you see this message not as a threat to yoursystem but> > > > > rather as an open ended question to ponder on keeping aside> > > > > ego,predjuice or any other negative emotions. > > > > > > > > > > regards and Best> > > > > Amit> > > > >> > > >> > >> >> > > > > > > > Be a better Heartthrob. Get better relationship answers fromsomeone who knows.> Answers - Check it out. > > > > > > > > > >

> Got a little couch potato? > Check out fun summer activities for kids.>

Fussy? Opinionated? Impossible to please? Perfect. Join 's user panel and lay it on us.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dear Harjeet,

I have to rush to the airport, but I did have a brief chat with

Krushanji and ask him this scenario.

3 zereos in navamsa can cause delay, and reduce the

happiness. Delay sometimes maybe of 30 years.

Thanks for asking this question. I also got some more insight into

this. J

 

 

Cheers !!!

Ash -> http://www.ashtro.ca

 

 

 

 

 

On Behalf Of Ash

Thursday September 13, 2007

1:31 PM

 

RE:

Re: Dear Ash et All :On the Creation of Universe and

Cosmology as applicable to

 

 

 

 

 

 

Dear Hajreet,

The delay calculations are as per the technique taught, i.e. say if

Sa is in 5th house in Navamsa so marriage can get delayed etc etc.

0’s in Rasi chart are used to find delay, but 0 in d-chart

has not been specified by Krushnaji.

0’s in D chart get covered in the basic strength

calculation.

 

 

Cheers !!!

 

Ash -> http://www.ashtro.ca

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

On Behalf Of harjeet bakshi

Thursday September 13, 2007

1:16 PM

 

 

Re: Dear Ash et All :On the Creation of Universe and Cosmology as applicable to

 

 

 

 

 

Dear

Anup,

wah wah!!

can you please give the birth data so other factors can be seen.

as per your question if i had to answer without considering other

factors... i am optimistic.. i would say delayed marriage :).

remember Krushnaji said.. 50% of effect by planet rest by efforts of

person. and if there are blessing in chart or from up above..

thanks/regards

harjeet

 

,

" Anup. M "

<dalh_1 wrote:

>

> Dear Harjeet ,

>

> " us shehar mein jao,to itna use kehna,

> baqi na sune koi, sirf tanha usay kehna,

> kuch log safar kay liye mozo'n (suitable) nahi hotay,

> kuch raaste kate nahi tanha,itna use kehna "

>

> Now tell me,how the quality of a marriage will be, if there is no

zero in SAV by any planet

> and three zero in navamsa :) and What about such case...denial or

delay of marriage??

>

> Regards

> Anup

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

> harjeet bakshi <harjeet_bakshi wrote:

> Dear Ashji,

> whenever one of my teacher used to give me smile.. i used to do

> something wrong in solving a problem... but she would not tell me till

> i asked her.

> so did i do something wrong?

> thanks/regards

> harjeet

>

> ,

" ashsam73 " <kas@>

> wrote:

> >

> > Dear Harjeet,

> >

> > :-)

> >

> > Cheers !!!

> > Ash -> http://www.ashtro.ca

> >

> > ,

" Ash " <kas@> wrote:

> > >

> > > Dear Harjeet,

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > > :-)

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > > Cheers !!!

> > >

> > > Ash -> <http://www.ashtro.ca>

http://www.ashtro.ca

> > >

> > > _____

> > >

> > >

> > >

On Behalf Of

harjeet

> > > bakshi

> > > Thursday September 13, 2007 11:19 AM

> > >

> > > Re: Dear Ash et All :On

the

> > Creation of

> > > Universe and Cosmology as applicable to

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > > Resp. Ashji,

> > > more over current antra of rahu samdhari to venus and mars.

> > > mars have more points for 12th compared to 11th.

> > > venus has 20 for 11th and 17 for 12th.

> > > rahu in 9th house triggers 12th and 4th house.

> > > so mars points in ws and rahu's position points to more

expenditure in

> > > current antra.

> > > moreover antras of mars,saturn,moon,mercury and sun have

less points

> > > in worsheet for 11th house compared to 12th.

> > > only jupiter and venus have a just little more points in 11th

compared

> > > to 12th.

> > > plus the sav in 12th is more than 11th.

> > > dont we take mean of sav from sun,moon and lagna ?

> > > anything wrong in my thinking?

> > > thanks/regards

> > > harjeet

> > >

> > > astrologyandtiminge

> > > <%40>

> > vents ,

> > > " Ash " <kas@> wrote:

> > > >

> > > > Dear Amit,

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > With this data u have given,

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > 19th May 1986

> > > >

> > > > 12:10 PM

> > > >

> > > > New Delhi

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > Planet

> > > >

> > > > Degrees

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > As

> > > >

> > > > 5 Le 38

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > Su

> > > >

> > > > 5 Ta 14

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > Mo

> > > >

> > > > 2 Vi 38

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > Ma

> > > >

> > > > 27 Sg 51

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > Me

> > > >

> > > > 0 Ta 39

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > Ju

> > > >

> > > > 25 Aq 40

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > Ve

> > > >

> > > > 4 Ge 28

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > SaR

> > > >

> > > > 14 Sc 17

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > Ra

> > > >

> > > > 5 Ar 44

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > Ke

> > > >

> > > > 5 Li 44

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > House

> > > >

> > > > 1

> > > >

> > > > 2

> > > >

> > > > 3

> > > >

> > > > 4

> > > >

> > > > 5

> > > >

> > > > 6

> > > >

> > > > 7

> > > >

> > > > 8

> > > >

> > > > 9

> > > >

> > > > 10

> > > >

> > > > 11

> > > >

> > > > 12

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > Sun

> > > >

> > >

> >

>

<file:///C:\Documents%20and%20Settings\ENagawkar\Desktop\KASMaster.xls#BAV!T

> > > > 7#BAV!T7>

> > > >

> > > > 10

> > > >

> > > > 3

> > > >

> > > > 3

> > > >

> > > > 4

> > > >

> > > > 5

> > > >

> > > > 5

> > > >

> > > > 4

> > > >

> > > > 4

> > > >

> > > > 3

> > > >

> > > > 1

> > > >

> > > > 4

> > > >

> > > > 6

> > > >

> > > > 6

> > > >

> > > > 48

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > Moon

> > > >

> > >

> >

>

<file:///C:\Documents%20and%20Settings\ENagawkar\Desktop\KASMaster.xls#BAV!A

> > > > J7#BAV!AJ7>

> > > >

> > > > 2

> > > >

> > > > 4

> > > >

> > > > 6

> > > >

> > > > 4

> > > >

> > > > 4

> > > >

> > > > 4

> > > >

> > > > 4

> > > >

> > > > 6

> > > >

> > > > 5

> > > >

> > > > 3

> > > >

> > > > 4

> > > >

> > > > 2

> > > >

> > > > 3

> > > >

> > > > 49

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > Mars

> > > >

> > >

> >

>

<file:///C:\Documents%20and%20Settings\ENagawkar\Desktop\KASMaster.xls#BAV!D

> > > > 34#BAV!D34>

> > > >

> > > > 5

> > > >

> > > > 2

> > > >

> > > > 4

> > > >

> > > > 4

> > > >

> > > > 4

> > > >

> > > > 2

> > > >

> > > > 4

> > > >

> > > > 3

> > > >

> > > > 3

> > > >

> > > > 1

> > > >

> > > > 3

> > > >

> > > > 3

> > > >

> > > > 6

> > > >

> > > > 39

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > Mercury

> > > >

> > >

> >

>

<file:///C:\Documents%20and%20Settings\ENagawkar\Desktop\KASMaster.xls#BAV!T

> > > > 34#BAV!T34>

> > > >

> > > > 10

> > > >

> > > > 4

> > > >

> > > > 7

> > > >

> > > > 5

> > > >

> > > > 2

> > > >

> > > > 4

> > > >

> > > > 6

> > > >

> > > > 4

> > > >

> > > > 4

> > > >

> > > > 4

> > > >

> > > > 3

> > > >

> > > > 5

> > > >

> > > > 6

> > > >

> > > > 54

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > Jupiter

> > > >

> > >

> >

>

<file:///C:\Documents%20and%20Settings\ENagawkar\Desktop\KASMaster.xls#BAV!A

> > > > J34#BAV!AJ34>

> > > >

> > > > 7

> > > >

> > > > 4

> > > >

> > > > 4

> > > >

> > > > 5

> > > >

> > > > 4

> > > >

> > > > 4

> > > >

> > > > 6

> > > >

> > > > 5

> > > >

> > > > 7

> > > >

> > > > 4

> > > >

> > > > 5

> > > >

> > > > 4

> > > >

> > > > 4

> > > >

> > > > 56

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > Venus

> > > >

> > >

> >

>

<file:///C:\Documents%20and%20Settings\ENagawkar\Desktop\KASMaster.xls#BAV!G

> > > > 61#BAV!G61>

> > > >

> > > > 11

> > > >

> > > > 5

> > > >

> > > > 6

> > > >

> > > > 6

> > > >

> > > > 4

> > > >

> > > > 4

> > > >

> > > > 4

> > > >

> > > > 3

> > > >

> > > > 5

> > > >

> > > > 5

> > > >

> > > > 2

> > > >

> > > > 4

> > > >

> > > > 4

> > > >

> > > > 52

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > Saturn

> > > >

> > >

> >

>

<file:///C:\Documents%20and%20Settings\ENagawkar\Desktop\KASMaster.xls#BAV!T

> > > > 61#BAV!T61>

> > > >

> > > > 4

> > > >

> > > > 2

> > > >

> > > > 2

> > > >

> > > > 3

> > > >

> > > > 5

> > > >

> > > > 3

> > > >

> > > > 4

> > > >

> > > > 4

> > > >

> > > > 3

> > > >

> > > > 4

> > > >

> > > > 4

> > > >

> > > > 3

> > > >

> > > > 2

> > > >

> > > > 39

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > Totals

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > 24

> > > >

> > > > 32

> > > >

> > > > 31

> > > >

> > > > 28

> > > >

> > > > 26

> > > >

> > > > 32

> > > >

> > > > 29

> > > >

> > > > 30

> > > >

> > > > 22

> > > >

> > > > 25

> > > >

> > > > 27

> > > >

> > > > 31

> > > >

> > > > 337

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > The points in 12th are more than 11th.

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > In any case, let it be.

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > Cheers !!!

> > > >

> > > > Ash -> <http://www.ashtro.

<http://www.ashtro.ca> ca>

> > http://www.ashtro.

> > > <http://www.ashtro.ca>

ca

> > > >

> > > > _____

> > > >

> > > > astrologyandtiminge

> > > <%40>

> > vents

> > > > [astrologyandtiminge

> > > <%40>

> > vents ]

> > > On Behalf Of planck12

> > > > Wednesday September 12, 2007 7:58 PM

> > > > astrologyandtiminge

> > > <%40>

> > vents

> > > > Re: Dear Ash et

All :On the

> > > Creation of

> > > > Universe and Cosmology as applicable to

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > Dear Ash,

> > > > Yes, I completely concur and thats all I wanted to clarify

from my

> > > > end. Again before I leave I have another chart if anyone

wants

> to use

> > > > from educational stand point.

> > > >

> > > > 19 May 1986

> > > > 12:10pm

> > > > new delhi.

 

> > > >

> > > > Again i decided to relate the 11/12th house points, in this

chart

> > > > again the worksheet decided to give more points in 11th

house than

> > > > 12th. But the girl has no savings, he is quite spendrift

and have

> > > > numerous expenses as compared to her income.

> > > >

> > > > Also to double check other things, i decided to check other

factors,

> > > > her brillancy for that matter. I think she has two parts in

saturn

> > > > degrees as shown with the work sheet. But she is not very

> intelligent,

> > > > again a decent girl who is quite jovial, but she has done a

> > > > certificate course and works in a local bank. As I

understand it

> from

> > > > the notes if one part is in saturn then person has odinary

> > > > intelligence and if two he/she has good intelligence. In

her

> case she

> > > > is normal like anyone else who has no part in saturns

division.

> > > >

> > > > Feel free to check, incase there are other things required,

as is

> > > > always the case in terms of details.

> > > >

> > > > 1. The girl is unmarried

> > > > 2. Wheatish complexion

> > > > 3. works in a bank as teller

> > > > 4. From a middle class family

> > > > 5. Has good morals, but tends to be energetic and hyper at

times

> > > >

> > > > regards

> > > > Nicked Vish (Amit) I prefer Vish

> > > >

> > > > astrologyandtiminge

> > > > <%40>

> > > vents (AT) (DOT) <vents%40>

com,

> > > > " Ash " <kas@> wrote:

> > > > >

> > > > > Dear Amit / Vishy (?),

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > > Everyone is entitled to their own opinion and All the

more

> reason we

> > > > should

> > > > > get back to KAS :-)

> > > > >

> > > > > Cheers !!!

> > > > >

> > > > > Ash -> <http://www.ashtro.

<http://www.ashtro.

> > <http://www.ashtro.ca>

> > > ca> ca>

> > > http://www.ashtro.

> > > > <http://www.ashtro.

<http://www.ashtro.ca> ca> ca

> > > > >

> > > > > _____

> > > > >

> > > > > astrologyandtiminge

> > > > <%40>

> > > vents (AT) (DOT) <vents%40>

com

> > > > > [astrologyandtiminge

> > > > <%40>

> > > vents (AT) (DOT) <vents%40>

com]

> > > > On Behalf Of

> > > > astroquery12

> > > > > Wednesday September 12, 2007 7:11 PM

> > > > > astrologyandtiminge

> > > > <%40>

> > > vents (AT) (DOT) <vents%40>

com

> > > > > Dear Ash et

All :On the

> > > Creation of

> > > > > Universe and Cosmology as applicable to Astr

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > > Hi,

> > > > > Hope you are doing well. This is Amit again, had

posted under a

> > > > > different name prior but that account did not seem to

work and

> > had to

> > > > > create a new id.

> > > > >

> > > > > I have been following the lessons for a while and

again I

see many

> > > > > in-consistencies with the system. My intention is not

to

refute or

> > > > > accept the system but purely to learn it and see it

> practicality and

> > > > > in the process provide my thoughts in opinions (after

all the

> > > > > astrology forum is a free form for discussion). Some

of my

> > doubts have

> > > > > cropped up again with the usual, 11th house points vs

12th house

> > > > > points and the actual condition of the charts (again

this is

only

> > > > > treating the chart with KAS)as opposed to mixing

parashra or k.p

> > etc.

> > > > >

> > > > > On another note, perhaps I can take the liberty to

explain

> again on

> > > > > why this happens and hopefully you concur with my

points and

> facts.

> > > > > After all astrology will make more meaning if we

understand it

> from

> > > > > all angles. You are a computer scientist (a man of

science)

> yourself

> > > > > and perhaps this description will make sense and will

take a

> purely

> > > > > scientific approach to it:

> > > > >

> > > > > I am sure you are familiar at least on the basic level

with

> > Einstein's

> > > > > relativity and the other theory called Quantum

Mechanics.

> During the

> > > > > creation of the universe at the point of big bang it

is widely

> > > > > believed that there were four fundamental forces in

the

universe:

> > > > > Gravity, electromagnetic, weak nuclear and strong

nuclear. It is

> > also

> > > > > now very well accepted that relativity explains

Gravity very

> > elegantly

> > > > > and that the theory has been tested to the point of

calculations

> > > > > pertaning to perhilion of mercury (closest pass to the

sun) with

> > > > > accuracy. On the other hand Quantum mechanics has done

well in

> > > > > unifying the other three forces of the electromagnetic

and

nuclear

> > > > > nature. BUT a BIG TWIST comes into the picture.

> > > > >

> > > > > Realivity claims that events (spacetime continum is

4D) are all

> > > > > associated together and there is no concept of past

and

future or

> > > > > present and in simple terms the destiney is already

written and

> > > > > nothing can change it, so given the right set of laws

one can

> > predict

> > > > > the course of life and the cosmos (relativistic

conditions on

> > > > > cosmology)to a complete accurate picture based on

fundametal

field

> > > > > equations of einstein. Again Einstein spent much of

his life

> > finding a

> > > > > Unified theory that would unify electromagnetics with

gravity BUT

> > > > FAILED.

> > > > >

> > > > > On the other hand QUANTUM MECHANICS claims that

nothing in

life is

> > > > > predictable infact everything is a probability. And QM

explains

> > atoms

> > > > > etc the world of sub atomic very well (this would

include the

> brain)

> > > > > the body etc, after all brain is essential a complex

neural

> network

> > > > > working on neurotransmitters signals which are

electrical in

> > nature.

> > > > > So it is quite justified that QM is applicable to us

as well

> > since we

> > > > > are made of atoms, eletrons etc. But the problem you

run into

> > with QM

> > > > > is that nothing is certain and that everything is

described as a

> > > > > probablity wave function of something called the

scrhorodingers

> > > > > equation. I would want you to refer to the thought

experiment

> termed

> > > > > " Schroender's Cat " which is hard for me

to explain on this fourm

> > but I

> > > > > am sure you will take the initiative of reading it, in

short

every

> > > > > observation made my an reference observer will change

the

> course of

> > > > > this obervation directly or indirectly depending on

the

> observation

> > > > > being made. Simply put, there is too much random ness

existent

> > in this

> > > > > universe to be able to describe anything in any

accruancy,

> > especially

> > > > > when it comes to life or the atomic scale.

> > > > >

> > > > > Now applying the above theories to describe astrology,

many

of the

> > > > > General predictions we make about the past or even the

future at

> > times

> > > > > happen to come true, yet there are many more

predictions we made

> > that

> > > > > do not come true at all. Because we are juggling

between

> certainity

> > > > > and chaos and that is not the fault or positive aspect

of anyone

> > > > > astrological system but rather the law of nature (God

if you may

> > call

> > > > > it). You have claimed in your past emails that KAS is

very

> accurate

> > > > > however on my sincere application of these principles

I have

> > found it

> > > > > smiliar to any other system because the rate of

predicition

> does not

> > > > > change much as compared to prashara or k.p or jaimini

for that

> > > matter.

> > > > >

> > > > > It is however a different story if we only look at the

positive

> > aspect

> > > > > and not realise the shortcomings of any system. My

approach is

> > to look

> > > > > at the short comings of this system simply because it

might help

> > > > > improve the system in some other way (again thats not

job). My

> sole

> > > > > intention for this posting has been to again reiterate

on a

> > scientific

> > > > > ground the limitations of astrology and that of human

mind and

> > that no

> > > > > matter how hard we try we will be bound by many

contraints. You

> > might

> > > > > claim that KAS predictions have come true, but I have

applied

> basic

> > > > > principles of many charts some of which have yielded

results but

> > again

> > > > > some of them have not yielded the correct results

(this I see

> > with an

> > > > > open mind) leading me to believe and again affirm with

the

> view that

> > > > > astrology has limitations on what can be predicted.

Any when

> we are

> > > > > bound by such limitations then ethically we should

take a more

> > > > > cautious approach in predicting in the first place and

perhaps a

> > more

> > > > > understanding, less materialistic (making money out of

astrology)

> > > > > attitude in researching things. This would also

involve being

> > open to

> > > > > genuine thoughts weather pro or against any system in

the

> betterment

> > > > > of knowledge.

> > > > >

> > > > > To end it Einstein once said " God does not play

dice with the

> > > > > Universe " on seeing Quatum Mechanics back in the

30s he was

> > > > > diasspointed with QM because he felt there was no free

will

> and that

> > > > > there was no such thing as probablity. A famous

Quautum

> Theorist (I

> > > > > will let you figure out who) responded by saying

" Not only

> does God

> > > > > play dice with Us, He also puts it in places where we

cannot

find

> > > it " .

> > > > >

> > > > > :) I hope you see this message not as a threat to your

system but

> > > > > rather as an open ended question to ponder on keeping

aside

> > > > > ego,predjuice or any other negative emotions.

> > > > >

> > > > > regards and Best

> > > > > Amit

> > > > >

> > > >

> > >

> >

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

> Be a better Heartthrob. Get better relationship answers from someone

who knows.

> Answers - Check it out.

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dear Ashji,

thanks for the reply.

bonvoyage.

would wait for more information on that.

thanks/regards

harjeet

 

, " Ash " <kas wrote:

>

> Dear Harjeet,

>

> I have to rush to the airport, but I did have a brief chat with

Krushanji

> and ask him this scenario.

>

> 3 zereos in navamsa can cause delay, and reduce the happiness. Delay

> sometimes maybe of 30 years.

>

> Thanks for asking this question. I also got some more insight into

this. :-)

>

>

>

> Cheers !!!

>

> Ash -> <http://www.ashtro.ca> http://www.ashtro.ca

>

> _____

>

>

> On Behalf Of Ash

> Thursday September 13, 2007 1:31 PM

>

> RE: Re: Dear Ash et All :On the

Creation

> of Universe and Cosmology as applicable to

>

>

>

> Dear Hajreet,

>

> The delay calculations are as per the technique taught, i.e. say if

Sa is in

> 5th house in Navamsa so marriage can get delayed etc etc.

>

> 0's in Rasi chart are used to find delay, but 0 in d-chart has not been

> specified by Krushnaji.

>

> 0's in D chart get covered in the basic strength calculation.

>

>

>

> Cheers !!!

>

> Ash -> <http://www.ashtro.ca> http://www.ashtro.ca

>

> _____

>

>

> On Behalf Of harjeet

> bakshi

> Thursday September 13, 2007 1:16 PM

>

> Re: Dear Ash et All :On the

Creation of

> Universe and Cosmology as applicable to

>

>

>

> Dear Anup,

> wah wah!!

> can you please give the birth data so other factors can be seen.

> as per your question if i had to answer without considering other

> factors... i am optimistic.. i would say delayed marriage :).

> remember Krushnaji said.. 50% of effect by planet rest by efforts of

> person. and if there are blessing in chart or from up above..

> thanks/regards

> harjeet

>

> astrologyandtiminge

> <%40>

vents ,

> " Anup. M "

> <dalh_1@> wrote:

> >

> > Dear Harjeet ,

> >

> > " us shehar mein jao,to itna use kehna,

> > baqi na sune koi, sirf tanha usay kehna,

> > kuch log safar kay liye mozo'n (suitable) nahi hotay,

> > kuch raaste kate nahi tanha,itna use kehna "

> >

> > Now tell me,how the quality of a marriage will be, if there is no

> zero in SAV by any planet

> > and three zero in navamsa :) and What about such case...denial or

> delay of marriage??

> >

> > Regards

> > Anup

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> > harjeet bakshi <harjeet_bakshi@> wrote:

> > Dear Ashji,

> > whenever one of my teacher used to give me smile.. i used to do

> > something wrong in solving a problem... but she would not tell me till

> > i asked her.

> > so did i do something wrong?

> > thanks/regards

> > harjeet

> >

> > astrologyandtiminge

> <%40>

vents ,

> " ashsam73 " <kas@>

> > wrote:

> > >

> > > Dear Harjeet,

> > >

> > > :-)

> > >

> > > Cheers !!!

> > > Ash -> http://www.ashtro. <http://www.ashtro.ca> ca

> > >

> > > astrologyandtiminge

> <%40>

vents ,

> " Ash " <kas@> wrote:

> > > >

> > > > Dear Harjeet,

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > :-)

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > Cheers !!!

> > > >

> > > > Ash -> <http://www.ashtro. <http://www.ashtro.ca> ca>

> http://www.ashtro. <http://www.ashtro.ca> ca

> > > >

> > > > _____

> > > >

> > > > astrologyandtiminge

> <%40>

vents

> > > > [astrologyandtiminge

> <%40>

vents ]

> On Behalf Of

> harjeet

> > > > bakshi

> > > > Thursday September 13, 2007 11:19 AM

> > > > astrologyandtiminge

> <%40>

vents

> > > > Re: Dear Ash et All :On the

> > > Creation of

> > > > Universe and Cosmology as applicable to

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > Resp. Ashji,

> > > > more over current antra of rahu samdhari to venus and mars.

> > > > mars have more points for 12th compared to 11th.

> > > > venus has 20 for 11th and 17 for 12th.

> > > > rahu in 9th house triggers 12th and 4th house.

> > > > so mars points in ws and rahu's position points to more

> expenditure in

> > > > current antra.

> > > > moreover antras of mars,saturn,moon,mercury and sun have less

points

> > > > in worsheet for 11th house compared to 12th.

> > > > only jupiter and venus have a just little more points in 11th

> compared

> > > > to 12th.

> > > > plus the sav in 12th is more than 11th.

> > > > dont we take mean of sav from sun,moon and lagna ?

> > > > anything wrong in my thinking?

> > > > thanks/regards

> > > > harjeet

> > > >

> > > > astrologyandtiminge

> > > > <%40>

> > > vents (AT) (DOT) <vents%40> com,

> > > > " Ash " <kas@> wrote:

> > > > >

> > > > > Dear Amit,

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > > With this data u have given,

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > > 19th May 1986

> > > > >

> > > > > 12:10 PM

> > > > >

> > > > > New Delhi

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > > Planet

> > > > >

> > > > > Degrees

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > > As

> > > > >

> > > > > 5 Le 38

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > > Su

> > > > >

> > > > > 5 Ta 14

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > > Mo

> > > > >

> > > > > 2 Vi 38

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > > Ma

> > > > >

> > > > > 27 Sg 51

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > > Me

> > > > >

> > > > > 0 Ta 39

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > > Ju

> > > > >

> > > > > 25 Aq 40

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > > Ve

> > > > >

> > > > > 4 Ge 28

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > > SaR

> > > > >

> > > > > 14 Sc 17

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > > Ra

> > > > >

> > > > > 5 Ar 44

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > > Ke

> > > > >

> > > > > 5 Li 44

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > > House

> > > > >

> > > > > 1

> > > > >

> > > > > 2

> > > > >

> > > > > 3

> > > > >

> > > > > 4

> > > > >

> > > > > 5

> > > > >

> > > > > 6

> > > > >

> > > > > 7

> > > > >

> > > > > 8

> > > > >

> > > > > 9

> > > > >

> > > > > 10

> > > > >

> > > > > 11

> > > > >

> > > > > 12

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > > Sun

> > > > >

> > > >

> > >

> >

>

<file:///C:\Documents%20and%20Settings\ENagawkar\Desktop\KASMaster.xls#BAV!T

> > > > > 7#BAV!T7>

> > > > >

> > > > > 10

> > > > >

> > > > > 3

> > > > >

> > > > > 3

> > > > >

> > > > > 4

> > > > >

> > > > > 5

> > > > >

> > > > > 5

> > > > >

> > > > > 4

> > > > >

> > > > > 4

> > > > >

> > > > > 3

> > > > >

> > > > > 1

> > > > >

> > > > > 4

> > > > >

> > > > > 6

> > > > >

> > > > > 6

> > > > >

> > > > > 48

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > > Moon

> > > > >

> > > >

> > >

> >

>

<file:///C:\Documents%20and%20Settings\ENagawkar\Desktop\KASMaster.xls#BAV!A

> > > > > J7#BAV!AJ7>

> > > > >

> > > > > 2

> > > > >

> > > > > 4

> > > > >

> > > > > 6

> > > > >

> > > > > 4

> > > > >

> > > > > 4

> > > > >

> > > > > 4

> > > > >

> > > > > 4

> > > > >

> > > > > 6

> > > > >

> > > > > 5

> > > > >

> > > > > 3

> > > > >

> > > > > 4

> > > > >

> > > > > 2

> > > > >

> > > > > 3

> > > > >

> > > > > 49

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > > Mars

> > > > >

> > > >

> > >

> >

>

<file:///C:\Documents%20and%20Settings\ENagawkar\Desktop\KASMaster.xls#BAV!D

> > > > > 34#BAV!D34>

> > > > >

> > > > > 5

> > > > >

> > > > > 2

> > > > >

> > > > > 4

> > > > >

> > > > > 4

> > > > >

> > > > > 4

> > > > >

> > > > > 2

> > > > >

> > > > > 4

> > > > >

> > > > > 3

> > > > >

> > > > > 3

> > > > >

> > > > > 1

> > > > >

> > > > > 3

> > > > >

> > > > > 3

> > > > >

> > > > > 6

> > > > >

> > > > > 39

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > > Mercury

> > > > >

> > > >

> > >

> >

>

<file:///C:\Documents%20and%20Settings\ENagawkar\Desktop\KASMaster.xls#BAV!T

> > > > > 34#BAV!T34>

> > > > >

> > > > > 10

> > > > >

> > > > > 4

> > > > >

> > > > > 7

> > > > >

> > > > > 5

> > > > >

> > > > > 2

> > > > >

> > > > > 4

> > > > >

> > > > > 6

> > > > >

> > > > > 4

> > > > >

> > > > > 4

> > > > >

> > > > > 4

> > > > >

> > > > > 3

> > > > >

> > > > > 5

> > > > >

> > > > > 6

> > > > >

> > > > > 54

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > > Jupiter

> > > > >

> > > >

> > >

> >

>

<file:///C:\Documents%20and%20Settings\ENagawkar\Desktop\KASMaster.xls#BAV!A

> > > > > J34#BAV!AJ34>

> > > > >

> > > > > 7

> > > > >

> > > > > 4

> > > > >

> > > > > 4

> > > > >

> > > > > 5

> > > > >

> > > > > 4

> > > > >

> > > > > 4

> > > > >

> > > > > 6

> > > > >

> > > > > 5

> > > > >

> > > > > 7

> > > > >

> > > > > 4

> > > > >

> > > > > 5

> > > > >

> > > > > 4

> > > > >

> > > > > 4

> > > > >

> > > > > 56

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > > Venus

> > > > >

> > > >

> > >

> >

>

<file:///C:\Documents%20and%20Settings\ENagawkar\Desktop\KASMaster.xls#BAV!G

> > > > > 61#BAV!G61>

> > > > >

> > > > > 11

> > > > >

> > > > > 5

> > > > >

> > > > > 6

> > > > >

> > > > > 6

> > > > >

> > > > > 4

> > > > >

> > > > > 4

> > > > >

> > > > > 4

> > > > >

> > > > > 3

> > > > >

> > > > > 5

> > > > >

> > > > > 5

> > > > >

> > > > > 2

> > > > >

> > > > > 4

> > > > >

> > > > > 4

> > > > >

> > > > > 52

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > > Saturn

> > > > >

> > > >

> > >

> >

>

<file:///C:\Documents%20and%20Settings\ENagawkar\Desktop\KASMaster.xls#BAV!T

> > > > > 61#BAV!T61>

> > > > >

> > > > > 4

> > > > >

> > > > > 2

> > > > >

> > > > > 2

> > > > >

> > > > > 3

> > > > >

> > > > > 5

> > > > >

> > > > > 3

> > > > >

> > > > > 4

> > > > >

> > > > > 4

> > > > >

> > > > > 3

> > > > >

> > > > > 4

> > > > >

> > > > > 4

> > > > >

> > > > > 3

> > > > >

> > > > > 2

> > > > >

> > > > > 39

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > > Totals

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > > 24

> > > > >

> > > > > 32

> > > > >

> > > > > 31

> > > > >

> > > > > 28

> > > > >

> > > > > 26

> > > > >

> > > > > 32

> > > > >

> > > > > 29

> > > > >

> > > > > 30

> > > > >

> > > > > 22

> > > > >

> > > > > 25

> > > > >

> > > > > 27

> > > > >

> > > > > 31

> > > > >

> > > > > 337

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > > The points in 12th are more than 11th.

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > > In any case, let it be.

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > > Cheers !!!

> > > > >

> > > > > Ash -> <http://www.ashtro. <http://www.ashtro.

> <http://www.ashtro.ca> ca> ca>

> > > http://www.ashtro.

> > > > <http://www.ashtro. <http://www.ashtro.ca> ca> ca

> > > > >

> > > > > _____

> > > > >

> > > > > astrologyandtiminge

> > > > <%40>

> > > vents (AT) (DOT) <vents%40> com

> > > > > [astrologyandtiminge

> > > > <%40>

> > > vents (AT) (DOT) <vents%40> com]

> > > > On Behalf Of planck12

> > > > > Wednesday September 12, 2007 7:58 PM

> > > > > astrologyandtiminge

> > > > <%40>

> > > vents (AT) (DOT) <vents%40> com

> > > > > Re: Dear Ash et All :On the

> > > > Creation of

> > > > > Universe and Cosmology as applicable to

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > > Dear Ash,

> > > > > Yes, I completely concur and thats all I wanted to clarify

from my

> > > > > end. Again before I leave I have another chart if anyone wants

> > to use

> > > > > from educational stand point.

> > > > >

> > > > > 19 May 1986

> > > > > 12:10pm

> > > > > new delhi.

> > > > >

> > > > > Again i decided to relate the 11/12th house points, in this

chart

> > > > > again the worksheet decided to give more points in 11th

house than

> > > > > 12th. But the girl has no savings, he is quite spendrift and

have

> > > > > numerous expenses as compared to her income.

> > > > >

> > > > > Also to double check other things, i decided to check other

> factors,

> > > > > her brillancy for that matter. I think she has two parts in

saturn

> > > > > degrees as shown with the work sheet. But she is not very

> > intelligent,

> > > > > again a decent girl who is quite jovial, but she has done a

> > > > > certificate course and works in a local bank. As I understand it

> > from

> > > > > the notes if one part is in saturn then person has odinary

> > > > > intelligence and if two he/she has good intelligence. In her

> > case she

> > > > > is normal like anyone else who has no part in saturns division.

> > > > >

> > > > > Feel free to check, incase there are other things required,

as is

> > > > > always the case in terms of details.

> > > > >

> > > > > 1. The girl is unmarried

> > > > > 2. Wheatish complexion

> > > > > 3. works in a bank as teller

> > > > > 4. From a middle class family

> > > > > 5. Has good morals, but tends to be energetic and hyper at

times

> > > > >

> > > > > regards

> > > > > Nicked Vish (Amit) I prefer Vish

> > > > >

> > > > > astrologyandtiminge

> > > > > <%40>

> > > > vents (AT) (DOT) <vents%40> com,

> > > > > " Ash " <kas@> wrote:

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Dear Amit / Vishy (?),

> > > > > >

> > > > > >

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Everyone is entitled to their own opinion and All the more

> > reason we

> > > > > should

> > > > > > get back to KAS :-)

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Cheers !!!

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Ash -> <http://www.ashtro. <http://www.ashtro.

> > > <http://www.ashtro. <http://www.ashtro.ca> ca>

> > > > ca> ca>

> > > > http://www.ashtro.

> > > > > <http://www.ashtro. <http://www.ashtro.

<http://www.ashtro.ca> ca>

> ca> ca

> > > > > >

> > > > > > _____

> > > > > >

> > > > > > astrologyandtiminge

> > > > > <%40>

> > > > vents (AT) (DOT) <vents%40> com

> > > > > > [astrologyandtiminge

> > > > > <%40>

> > > > vents (AT) (DOT) <vents%40> com]

> > > > > On Behalf Of

> > > > > astroquery12

> > > > > > Wednesday September 12, 2007 7:11 PM

> > > > > > astrologyandtiminge

> > > > > <%40>

> > > > vents (AT) (DOT) <vents%40> com

> > > > > > Dear Ash et All :On the

> > > > Creation of

> > > > > > Universe and Cosmology as applicable to Astr

> > > > > >

> > > > > >

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Hi,

> > > > > > Hope you are doing well. This is Amit again, had posted

under a

> > > > > > different name prior but that account did not seem to work and

> > > had to

> > > > > > create a new id.

> > > > > >

> > > > > > I have been following the lessons for a while and again I

> see many

> > > > > > in-consistencies with the system. My intention is not to

> refute or

> > > > > > accept the system but purely to learn it and see it

> > practicality and

> > > > > > in the process provide my thoughts in opinions (after all the

> > > > > > astrology forum is a free form for discussion). Some of my

> > > doubts have

> > > > > > cropped up again with the usual, 11th house points vs 12th

house

> > > > > > points and the actual condition of the charts (again this is

> only

> > > > > > treating the chart with KAS)as opposed to mixing parashra

or k.p

> > > etc.

> > > > > >

> > > > > > On another note, perhaps I can take the liberty to explain

> > again on

> > > > > > why this happens and hopefully you concur with my points and

> > facts.

> > > > > > After all astrology will make more meaning if we understand it

> > from

> > > > > > all angles. You are a computer scientist (a man of science)

> > yourself

> > > > > > and perhaps this description will make sense and will take a

> > purely

> > > > > > scientific approach to it:

> > > > > >

> > > > > > I am sure you are familiar at least on the basic level with

> > > Einstein's

> > > > > > relativity and the other theory called Quantum Mechanics.

> > During the

> > > > > > creation of the universe at the point of big bang it is widely

> > > > > > believed that there were four fundamental forces in the

> universe:

> > > > > > Gravity, electromagnetic, weak nuclear and strong nuclear.

It is

> > > also

> > > > > > now very well accepted that relativity explains Gravity very

> > > elegantly

> > > > > > and that the theory has been tested to the point of

calculations

> > > > > > pertaning to perhilion of mercury (closest pass to the

sun) with

> > > > > > accuracy. On the other hand Quantum mechanics has done well in

> > > > > > unifying the other three forces of the electromagnetic and

> nuclear

> > > > > > nature. BUT a BIG TWIST comes into the picture.

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Realivity claims that events (spacetime continum is 4D)

are all

> > > > > > associated together and there is no concept of past and

> future or

> > > > > > present and in simple terms the destiney is already

written and

> > > > > > nothing can change it, so given the right set of laws one can

> > > predict

> > > > > > the course of life and the cosmos (relativistic conditions on

> > > > > > cosmology)to a complete accurate picture based on fundametal

> field

> > > > > > equations of einstein. Again Einstein spent much of his life

> > > finding a

> > > > > > Unified theory that would unify electromagnetics with

> gravity BUT

> > > > > FAILED.

> > > > > >

> > > > > > On the other hand QUANTUM MECHANICS claims that nothing in

> life is

> > > > > > predictable infact everything is a probability. And QM

explains

> > > atoms

> > > > > > etc the world of sub atomic very well (this would include the

> > brain)

> > > > > > the body etc, after all brain is essential a complex neural

> > network

> > > > > > working on neurotransmitters signals which are electrical in

> > > nature.

> > > > > > So it is quite justified that QM is applicable to us as well

> > > since we

> > > > > > are made of atoms, eletrons etc. But the problem you run into

> > > with QM

> > > > > > is that nothing is certain and that everything is

described as a

> > > > > > probablity wave function of something called the

scrhorodingers

> > > > > > equation. I would want you to refer to the thought experiment

> > termed

> > > > > > " Schroender's Cat " which is hard for me to explain on this

fourm

> > > but I

> > > > > > am sure you will take the initiative of reading it, in short

> every

> > > > > > observation made my an reference observer will change the

> > course of

> > > > > > this obervation directly or indirectly depending on the

> > observation

> > > > > > being made. Simply put, there is too much random ness existent

> > > in this

> > > > > > universe to be able to describe anything in any accruancy,

> > > especially

> > > > > > when it comes to life or the atomic scale.

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Now applying the above theories to describe astrology, many

> of the

> > > > > > General predictions we make about the past or even the

future at

> > > times

> > > > > > happen to come true, yet there are many more predictions

we made

> > > that

> > > > > > do not come true at all. Because we are juggling between

> > certainity

> > > > > > and chaos and that is not the fault or positive aspect of

anyone

> > > > > > astrological system but rather the law of nature (God if

you may

> > > call

> > > > > > it). You have claimed in your past emails that KAS is very

> > accurate

> > > > > > however on my sincere application of these principles I have

> > > found it

> > > > > > smiliar to any other system because the rate of predicition

> > does not

> > > > > > change much as compared to prashara or k.p or jaimini for that

> > > > matter.

> > > > > >

> > > > > > It is however a different story if we only look at the

positive

> > > aspect

> > > > > > and not realise the shortcomings of any system. My approach is

> > > to look

> > > > > > at the short comings of this system simply because it

might help

> > > > > > improve the system in some other way (again thats not job). My

> > sole

> > > > > > intention for this posting has been to again reiterate on a

> > > scientific

> > > > > > ground the limitations of astrology and that of human mind and

> > > that no

> > > > > > matter how hard we try we will be bound by many

contraints. You

> > > might

> > > > > > claim that KAS predictions have come true, but I have applied

> > basic

> > > > > > principles of many charts some of which have yielded

results but

> > > again

> > > > > > some of them have not yielded the correct results (this I see

> > > with an

> > > > > > open mind) leading me to believe and again affirm with the

> > view that

> > > > > > astrology has limitations on what can be predicted. Any when

> > we are

> > > > > > bound by such limitations then ethically we should take a more

> > > > > > cautious approach in predicting in the first place and

perhaps a

> > > more

> > > > > > understanding, less materialistic (making money out of

> astrology)

> > > > > > attitude in researching things. This would also involve being

> > > open to

> > > > > > genuine thoughts weather pro or against any system in the

> > betterment

> > > > > > of knowledge.

> > > > > >

> > > > > > To end it Einstein once said " God does not play dice with the

> > > > > > Universe " on seeing Quatum Mechanics back in the 30s he was

> > > > > > diasspointed with QM because he felt there was no free will

> > and that

> > > > > > there was no such thing as probablity. A famous Quautum

> > Theorist (I

> > > > > > will let you figure out who) responded by saying " Not only

> > does God

> > > > > > play dice with Us, He also puts it in places where we cannot

> find

> > > > it " .

> > > > > >

> > > > > > :) I hope you see this message not as a threat to your

> system but

> > > > > > rather as an open ended question to ponder on keeping aside

> > > > > > ego,predjuice or any other negative emotions.

> > > > > >

> > > > > > regards and Best

> > > > > > Amit

> > > > > >

> > > > >

> > > >

> > >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> > Be a better Heartthrob. Get better relationship answers from someone

> who knows.

> > Answers - Check it out.

> >

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dear Ash and Harjeet, This was the chart i was aking about, but here one zero in SAV and three zero in SAV if we take DST as no. February 16Th at 1:55 PM ( afternoon)(13:55) year 1976. born in Washington DC ( USA). She is unmarried and her father requested for analysis for marriage prospetcs. I think Venus antra can give marriage. No Sat delay but Jup delay is there. I think Ash is right as he said that delay sometimes can be upto 30 years. Regards Anup harjeet bakshi <harjeet_bakshi wrote: Dear Ashji,thanks for the reply.bonvoyage.would wait for more information on that.thanks/regardsharjeet , "Ash" <kas wrote:>> Dear Harjeet,> > I have to rush to the airport, but I did have a brief chat withKrushanji> and ask him this scenario.> > 3 zereos in navamsa can cause delay, and reduce the happiness. Delay> sometimes maybe of 30 years.> >

Thanks for asking this question. I also got some more insight intothis. :-)> > > > Cheers !!!> > Ash -> <http://www.ashtro.ca> http://www.ashtro.ca> > _____ > > > On Behalf Of Ash> Thursday September 13, 2007 1:31 PM> > RE: Re: Dear Ash et All :On theCreation> of Universe and Cosmology as applicable to> > > > Dear Hajreet,> > The

delay calculations are as per the technique taught, i.e. say ifSa is in> 5th house in Navamsa so marriage can get delayed etc etc.> > 0's in Rasi chart are used to find delay, but 0 in d-chart has not been> specified by Krushnaji.> > 0's in D chart get covered in the basic strength calculation. > > > > Cheers !!!> > Ash -> <http://www.ashtro.ca> http://www.ashtro.ca> > _____ > > > On Behalf Of harjeet> bakshi> Thursday September 13, 2007 1:16 PM> > Re: Dear Ash et All :On theCreation of> Universe and Cosmology as applicable to> > > > Dear Anup,> wah wah!!> can you please give the birth data so other factors can be seen.> as per your question if i had to answer without considering other> factors... i am optimistic.. i would say delayed marriage :).> remember Krushnaji said.. 50% of effect by planet rest by efforts of> person. and if there are blessing in chart or from up above..> thanks/regards> harjeet> > astrologyandtiminge> <%40>vents ,> "Anup. M"> <dalh_1@> wrote:>

>> > Dear Harjeet ,> > > > "us shehar mein jao,to itna use kehna,> > baqi na sune koi, sirf tanha usay kehna,> > kuch log safar kay liye mozo'n (suitable) nahi hotay,> > kuch raaste kate nahi tanha,itna use kehna"> > > > Now tell me,how the quality of a marriage will be, if there is no> zero in SAV by any planet > > and three zero in navamsa :) and What about such case...denial or> delay of marriage??> > > > Regards> > Anup> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > harjeet bakshi <harjeet_bakshi@> wrote:> > Dear Ashji,> > whenever one of my teacher used to give me smile.. i used to do> > something wrong in solving a problem... but she would not tell me till> > i asked her.> > so did i do something

wrong?> > thanks/regards> > harjeet> > > > astrologyandtiminge> <%40>vents ,> "ashsam73" <kas@>> > wrote:> > >> > > Dear Harjeet,> > > > > > :-)> > > > > > Cheers !!!> > > Ash -> http://www.ashtro. <http://www.ashtro.ca> ca> > > > > > astrologyandtiminge> <%40>vents ,> "Ash" <kas@> wrote:> > > >> > > > Dear Harjeet,> > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > :-) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cheers !!!> > > > > > > > Ash -> <http://www.ashtro. <http://www.ashtro.ca> ca>> http://www.ashtro. <http://www.ashtro.ca> ca> > > > > > > > _____ > > > > > > > > astrologyandtiminge> <%40>vents > > > > [astrologyandtiminge> <%40>vents ]> On Behalf

Of> harjeet> > > > bakshi> > > > Thursday September 13, 2007 11:19 AM> > > > astrologyandtiminge> <%40>vents > > > > Re: Dear Ash et All :On the> > > Creation of> > > > Universe and Cosmology as applicable to> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Resp. Ashji,> > > > more over current antra of rahu samdhari to venus and mars.> > > > mars have more points for 12th compared to 11th.> > > > venus has 20 for 11th and 17 for 12th.> > > > rahu in 9th house triggers 12th and 4th house.> > > > so mars points in ws and rahu's position points to more>

expenditure in> > > > current antra.> > > > moreover antras of mars,saturn,moon,mercury and sun have lesspoints> > > > in worsheet for 11th house compared to 12th.> > > > only jupiter and venus have a just little more points in 11th> compared> > > > to 12th.> > > > plus the sav in 12th is more than 11th.> > > > dont we take mean of sav from sun,moon and lagna ?> > > > anything wrong in my thinking?> > > > thanks/regards> > > > harjeet> > > > > > > > astrologyandtiminge> > > > <%40>> > > vents (AT) (DOT) <vents%40> com,> > > > "Ash" <kas@> wrote:> > > > >> > > > > Dear

Amit,> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > With this data u have given,> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 19th May 1986> > > > > > > > > > 12:10 PM> > > > > > > > > > New Delhi> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Planet> > > > > > > > > > Degrees> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > As> > > > > > > > > > 5 Le 38> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Su> > > > > > > > > > 5

Ta 14> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Mo> > > > > > > > > > 2 Vi 38> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Ma> > > > > > > > > > 27 Sg 51> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Me> > > > > > > > > > 0 Ta 39> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Ju> > > > > > > > > > 25 Aq 40> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Ve> > > > > > > > > > 4 Ge 28> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > SaR> > > > > > > > > > 14 Sc 17> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > Ra> > > > > > > > > > 5 Ar 44> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Ke> > > > > > > > > > 5 Li 44> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > House> > > > > > > > > > 1> > > > > > > > > > 2> > > > > > > > > > 3> > > > > > > > > > 4> > > > > > > > > > 5> > > > > > > > > > 6> > > > > > > > > > 7> > > > > > > > >

> 8> > > > > > > > > > 9> > > > > > > > > > 10> > > > > > > > > > 11> > > > > > > > > > 12> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Sun> > > > >> > > >> > >> >><file:///C:\Documents%20and%20Settings\ENagawkar\Desktop\KASMaster.xls#BAV!T> > > > > 7#BAV!T7> > > > > > > > > > > 10> > > > > > > > > > 3> > > > > > > > > > 3> > > > > > > > > > 4> > > > > > > > > > 5> > > > >

> > > > > 5> > > > > > > > > > 4> > > > > > > > > > 4> > > > > > > > > > 3> > > > > > > > > > 1> > > > > > > > > > 4> > > > > > > > > > 6> > > > > > > > > > 6> > > > > > > > > > 48> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Moon> > > > >> > > >> > >> >><file:///C:\Documents%20and%20Settings\ENagawkar\Desktop\KASMaster.xls#BAV!A> > > > > J7#BAV!AJ7> > > > > > > > > > > 2> > > > > > > > > > 4>

> > > > > > > > > 6> > > > > > > > > > 4> > > > > > > > > > 4> > > > > > > > > > 4> > > > > > > > > > 4> > > > > > > > > > 6> > > > > > > > > > 5> > > > > > > > > > 3> > > > > > > > > > 4> > > > > > > > > > 2> > > > > > > > > > 3> > > > > > > > > > 49> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Mars> > > > >> > > >> > >> >><file:///C:\Documents%20and%20Settings\ENagawkar\Desktop\KASMaster.xls#BAV!D> > > > > 34#BAV!D34> > > > > > > > > > > 5> > > > > > > > > > 2> > > > > > > > > > 4> > > > > > > > > > 4> > > > > > > > > > 4> > > > > > > > > > 2> > > > > > > > > > 4> > > > > > > > > > 3> > > > > > > > > > 3> > > > > > > > > > 1> > > > > > > > > > 3> > > > > > > > > > 3> > > > > > > > > > 6> > > > > > > > >

> 39> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Mercury> > > > >> > > >> > >> >><file:///C:\Documents%20and%20Settings\ENagawkar\Desktop\KASMaster.xls#BAV!T> > > > > 34#BAV!T34> > > > > > > > > > > 10> > > > > > > > > > 4> > > > > > > > > > 7> > > > > > > > > > 5> > > > > > > > > > 2> > > > > > > > > > 4> > > > > > > > > > 6> > > > > > > > > > 4> > > > > > > > > > 4> > > > > > > > > > 4> > > > >

> > > > > 3> > > > > > > > > > 5> > > > > > > > > > 6> > > > > > > > > > 54> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Jupiter> > > > >> > > >> > >> >><file:///C:\Documents%20and%20Settings\ENagawkar\Desktop\KASMaster.xls#BAV!A> > > > > J34#BAV!AJ34> > > > > > > > > > > 7> > > > > > > > > > 4> > > > > > > > > > 4> > > > > > > > > > 5> > > > > > > > > > 4> > > > > > > > > > 4> > > > > > > > > >

6> > > > > > > > > > 5> > > > > > > > > > 7> > > > > > > > > > 4> > > > > > > > > > 5> > > > > > > > > > 4> > > > > > > > > > 4> > > > > > > > > > 56> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Venus> > > > >> > > >> > >> >><file:///C:\Documents%20and%20Settings\ENagawkar\Desktop\KASMaster.xls#BAV!G> > > > > 61#BAV!G61> > > > > > > > > > > 11> > > > > > > > > > 5> > > > > > > > > > 6> > > > >

> > > > > 6> > > > > > > > > > 4> > > > > > > > > > 4> > > > > > > > > > 4> > > > > > > > > > 3> > > > > > > > > > 5> > > > > > > > > > 5> > > > > > > > > > 2> > > > > > > > > > 4> > > > > > > > > > 4> > > > > > > > > > 52> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Saturn> > > > >> > > >> > >> >><file:///C:\Documents%20and%20Settings\ENagawkar\Desktop\KASMaster.xls#BAV!T> > > > > 61#BAV!T61>

> > > > > > > > > > 4> > > > > > > > > > 2> > > > > > > > > > 2> > > > > > > > > > 3> > > > > > > > > > 5> > > > > > > > > > 3> > > > > > > > > > 4> > > > > > > > > > 4> > > > > > > > > > 3> > > > > > > > > > 4> > > > > > > > > > 4> > > > > > > > > > 3> > > > > > > > > > 2> > > > > > > > > > 39> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Totals> > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > 24> > > > > > > > > > 32> > > > > > > > > > 31> > > > > > > > > > 28> > > > > > > > > > 26> > > > > > > > > > 32> > > > > > > > > > 29> > > > > > > > > > 30> > > > > > > > > > 22> > > > > > > > > > 25> > > > > > > > > > 27> > > > > > > > > > 31> > > > > > > > > > 337> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The points in 12th are more than

11th.> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > In any case, let it be.> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cheers !!!> > > > > > > > > > Ash -> <http://www.ashtro. <http://www.ashtro.> <http://www.ashtro.ca> ca> ca>> > > http://www.ashtro.> > > > <http://www.ashtro. <http://www.ashtro.ca> ca> ca> > > > > > > > > > _____ > > > > > > > > > > astrologyandtiminge> > > >

<%40>> > > vents (AT) (DOT) <vents%40> com> > > > > [astrologyandtiminge> > > > <%40>> > > vents (AT) (DOT) <vents%40> com]> > > > On Behalf Of planck12> > > > > Wednesday September 12, 2007 7:58 PM> > > > > astrologyandtiminge> > > > <%40>> > > vents (AT) (DOT) <vents%40> com> > > > > Re: Dear Ash et All :On the> > > > Creation of> > > > > Universe and Cosmology as applicable to> > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Ash, > > > > > Yes, I completely concur and thats all I wanted to clarifyfrom my> > > > > end. Again before I leave I have another chart if anyone wants> > to use> > > > > from educational stand point. > > > > > > > > > > 19 May 1986> > > > > 12:10pm > > > > > new delhi. > > > > > > > > > > Again i decided to relate the 11/12th house points, in thischart> > > > > again the worksheet decided to give more points in 11thhouse than> > > > > 12th. But the girl has no savings, he is quite spendrift andhave> > > > > numerous expenses as compared to her income. > > > > > > > > > > Also to double

check other things, i decided to check other> factors,> > > > > her brillancy for that matter. I think she has two parts insaturn> > > > > degrees as shown with the work sheet. But she is not very> > intelligent,> > > > > again a decent girl who is quite jovial, but she has done a> > > > > certificate course and works in a local bank. As I understand it> > from> > > > > the notes if one part is in saturn then person has odinary> > > > > intelligence and if two he/she has good intelligence. In her> > case she> > > > > is normal like anyone else who has no part in saturns division. > > > > > > > > > > Feel free to check, incase there are other things required,as is> > > > > always the case in terms of details. > > > > >

> > > > > 1. The girl is unmarried> > > > > 2. Wheatish complexion > > > > > 3. works in a bank as teller > > > > > 4. From a middle class family> > > > > 5. Has good morals, but tends to be energetic and hyper attimes > > > > > > > > > > regards> > > > > Nicked Vish (Amit) I prefer Vish > > > > > > > > > > astrologyandtiminge> > > > > <%40>> > > > vents (AT) (DOT) <vents%40> com,> > > > > "Ash" <kas@> wrote:> > > > > >> > > > > > Dear Amit / Vishy (?),> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > Everyone is entitled to their own opinion and All the more> > reason we> > > > > should> > > > > > get back to KAS :-)> > > > > > > > > > > > Cheers !!!> > > > > > > > > > > > Ash -> <http://www.ashtro. <http://www.ashtro.> > > <http://www.ashtro. <http://www.ashtro.ca> ca>> > > > ca> ca>> > > > http://www.ashtro.> > > > > <http://www.ashtro. <http://www.ashtro.<http://www.ashtro.ca> ca>> ca> ca> > > >

> > > > > > > > _____ > > > > > > > > > > > > astrologyandtiminge> > > > > <%40>> > > > vents (AT) (DOT) <vents%40> com> > > > > > [astrologyandtiminge> > > > > <%40>> > > > vents (AT) (DOT) <vents%40> com]> > > > > On Behalf Of> > > > > astroquery12> > > > > > Wednesday September 12, 2007 7:11 PM> > > > > > astrologyandtiminge> > > > > <%40>> > > > vents (AT) (DOT)

<vents%40> com> > > > > > Dear Ash et All :On the> > > > Creation of> > > > > > Universe and Cosmology as applicable to Astr> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > Hope you are doing well. This is Amit again, had postedunder a> > > > > > different name prior but that account did not seem to work and> > > had to> > > > > > create a new id. > > > > > > > > > > > > I have been following the lessons for a while and again I> see many> > > > > > in-consistencies with the system. My intention is not to> refute or> > > > > > accept the system but purely

to learn it and see it> > practicality and> > > > > > in the process provide my thoughts in opinions (after all the> > > > > > astrology forum is a free form for discussion). Some of my> > > doubts have> > > > > > cropped up again with the usual, 11th house points vs 12thhouse> > > > > > points and the actual condition of the charts (again this is> only> > > > > > treating the chart with KAS)as opposed to mixing parashraor k.p> > > etc. > > > > > > > > > > > > On another note, perhaps I can take the liberty to explain> > again on> > > > > > why this happens and hopefully you concur with my points and> > facts.> > > > > > After all astrology will make more meaning if we understand it> > from>

> > > > > all angles. You are a computer scientist (a man of science)> > yourself> > > > > > and perhaps this description will make sense and will take a> > purely> > > > > > scientific approach to it: > > > > > > > > > > > > I am sure you are familiar at least on the basic level with> > > Einstein's> > > > > > relativity and the other theory called Quantum Mechanics.> > During the> > > > > > creation of the universe at the point of big bang it is widely> > > > > > believed that there were four fundamental forces in the> universe:> > > > > > Gravity, electromagnetic, weak nuclear and strong nuclear.It is> > > also> > > > > > now very well accepted that relativity explains Gravity very> >

> elegantly> > > > > > and that the theory has been tested to the point ofcalculations> > > > > > pertaning to perhilion of mercury (closest pass to thesun) with> > > > > > accuracy. On the other hand Quantum mechanics has done well in> > > > > > unifying the other three forces of the electromagnetic and> nuclear> > > > > > nature. BUT a BIG TWIST comes into the picture. > > > > > > > > > > > > Realivity claims that events (spacetime continum is 4D)are all> > > > > > associated together and there is no concept of past and> future or> > > > > > present and in simple terms the destiney is alreadywritten and> > > > > > nothing can change it, so given the right set of laws one can> > > predict> > > >

> > the course of life and the cosmos (relativistic conditions on> > > > > > cosmology)to a complete accurate picture based on fundametal> field> > > > > > equations of einstein. Again Einstein spent much of his life> > > finding a> > > > > > Unified theory that would unify electromagnetics with> gravity BUT> > > > > FAILED. > > > > > > > > > > > > On the other hand QUANTUM MECHANICS claims that nothing in> life is> > > > > > predictable infact everything is a probability. And QMexplains> > > atoms> > > > > > etc the world of sub atomic very well (this would include the> > brain)> > > > > > the body etc, after all brain is essential a complex neural> > network> > > > > > working on

neurotransmitters signals which are electrical in> > > nature. > > > > > > So it is quite justified that QM is applicable to us as well> > > since we> > > > > > are made of atoms, eletrons etc. But the problem you run into> > > with QM> > > > > > is that nothing is certain and that everything isdescribed as a> > > > > > probablity wave function of something called thescrhorodingers> > > > > > equation. I would want you to refer to the thought experiment> > termed> > > > > > "Schroender's Cat" which is hard for me to explain on thisfourm> > > but I> > > > > > am sure you will take the initiative of reading it, in short> every> > > > > > observation made my an reference observer will change the> > course

of> > > > > > this obervation directly or indirectly depending on the> > observation> > > > > > being made. Simply put, there is too much random ness existent> > > in this> > > > > > universe to be able to describe anything in any accruancy,> > > especially> > > > > > when it comes to life or the atomic scale. > > > > > > > > > > > > Now applying the above theories to describe astrology, many> of the> > > > > > General predictions we make about the past or even thefuture at> > > times> > > > > > happen to come true, yet there are many more predictionswe made> > > that> > > > > > do not come true at all. Because we are juggling between> > certainity> > > > > > and chaos

and that is not the fault or positive aspect ofanyone> > > > > > astrological system but rather the law of nature (God ifyou may> > > call> > > > > > it). You have claimed in your past emails that KAS is very> > accurate> > > > > > however on my sincere application of these principles I have> > > found it> > > > > > smiliar to any other system because the rate of predicition> > does not> > > > > > change much as compared to prashara or k.p or jaimini for that> > > > matter. > > > > > > > > > > > > It is however a different story if we only look at thepositive> > > aspect> > > > > > and not realise the shortcomings of any system. My approach is> > > to look> > > > > > at the short

comings of this system simply because itmight help> > > > > > improve the system in some other way (again thats not job). My> > sole> > > > > > intention for this posting has been to again reiterate on a> > > scientific> > > > > > ground the limitations of astrology and that of human mind and> > > that no> > > > > > matter how hard we try we will be bound by manycontraints. You> > > might> > > > > > claim that KAS predictions have come true, but I have applied> > basic> > > > > > principles of many charts some of which have yieldedresults but> > > again> > > > > > some of them have not yielded the correct results (this I see> > > with an> > > > > > open mind) leading me to believe and again affirm with

the> > view that> > > > > > astrology has limitations on what can be predicted. Any when> > we are> > > > > > bound by such limitations then ethically we should take a more> > > > > > cautious approach in predicting in the first place andperhaps a> > > more> > > > > > understanding, less materialistic (making money out of> astrology)> > > > > > attitude in researching things. This would also involve being> > > open to> > > > > > genuine thoughts weather pro or against any system in the> > betterment> > > > > > of knowledge. > > > > > > > > > > > > To end it Einstein once said "God does not play dice with the> > > > > > Universe" on seeing Quatum Mechanics back in the 30s he was> >

> > > > diasspointed with QM because he felt there was no free will> > and that> > > > > > there was no such thing as probablity. A famous Quautum> > Theorist (I> > > > > > will let you figure out who) responded by saying "Not only> > does God> > > > > > play dice with Us, He also puts it in places where we cannot> find> > > > it". > > > > > > > > > > > > :) I hope you see this message not as a threat to your> system but> > > > > > rather as an open ended question to ponder on keeping aside> > > > > > ego,predjuice or any other negative emotions. > > > > > > > > > > > > regards and Best> > > > > > Amit> > > > > >> > > > >> > >

>> > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Be a better Heartthrob. Get better relationship answers from someone> who knows.> > Answers - Check it out.> >>

Be a better Heartthrob. Get better relationship answers from someone who knows. Answers - Check it out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sorry three zero in navamsa Anup"Anup. M" <dalh_1 wrote: Dear Ash and Harjeet, This was the chart i was aking about, but here one zero in SAV and three zero in SAV if we take DST as no. February 16Th at 1:55 PM ( afternoon)(13:55) year 1976. born in Washington DC ( USA). She is unmarried and her father requested for analysis for marriage prospetcs. I think Venus antra can give marriage. No Sat delay but Jup delay is there. I think Ash is right as he said that delay sometimes can be upto 30 years. Regards Anup harjeet bakshi <harjeet_bakshi > wrote: Dear Ashji,thanks for the reply.bonvoyage.would wait for more information on that.thanks/regardsharjeet , "Ash" <kas wrote:>> Dear Harjeet,> > I

have to rush to the airport, but I did have a brief chat withKrushanji> and ask him this scenario.> > 3 zereos in navamsa can cause delay, and reduce the happiness. Delay> sometimes maybe of 30 years.> > Thanks for asking this question. I also got some more insight intothis. :-)> > > > Cheers !!!> > Ash -> <http://www.ashtro.ca> http://www.ashtro.ca> > _____ > > > On Behalf Of Ash> Thursday September 13, 2007 1:31 PM> > RE: Re: Dear Ash et All :On theCreation> of Universe and Cosmology as applicable to> > > > Dear Hajreet,> > The delay calculations are as per the technique taught, i.e. say ifSa is in> 5th house in Navamsa so marriage can get delayed etc etc.> > 0's in Rasi chart are used to find delay, but 0 in d-chart has not been> specified by Krushnaji.> > 0's in D chart get covered in the basic strength calculation. > > > > Cheers !!!> > Ash -> <http://www.ashtro.ca> http://www.ashtro.ca> > _____ > > > On Behalf Of harjeet> bakshi> Thursday September 13, 2007 1:16 PM> > Re: Dear Ash et All :On theCreation of> Universe and Cosmology as applicable to> > > > Dear Anup,> wah wah!!> can you please give the birth data so other factors can be seen.> as per your question if i had to answer without considering other> factors... i am optimistic.. i would say delayed marriage :).> remember Krushnaji said.. 50% of effect by planet rest by efforts of> person. and if there are

blessing in chart or from up above..> thanks/regards> harjeet> > astrologyandtiminge> <%40>vents ,> "Anup. M"> <dalh_1@> wrote:> >> > Dear Harjeet ,> > > > "us shehar mein jao,to itna use kehna,> > baqi na sune koi, sirf tanha usay kehna,> > kuch log safar kay liye mozo'n (suitable) nahi hotay,> > kuch raaste kate nahi tanha,itna use kehna"> > > > Now tell me,how the quality of a marriage will be, if there is no> zero in SAV by any planet > > and three zero in navamsa :) and What about such case...denial or> delay of marriage??> > > > Regards> > Anup> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > harjeet bakshi <harjeet_bakshi@> wrote:> > Dear Ashji,> > whenever one of my teacher used to give me smile.. i used to do> > something wrong in solving a problem... but she would not tell me till> > i asked her.> > so did i do something wrong?> > thanks/regards> > harjeet> > > > astrologyandtiminge> <%40>vents ,> "ashsam73" <kas@>> > wrote:> > >> > > Dear Harjeet,> > > > > > :-)> > > > > > Cheers !!!> > > Ash -> http://www.ashtro. <http://www.ashtro.ca> ca> > > > >

> astrologyandtiminge> <%40>vents ,> "Ash" <kas@> wrote:> > > >> > > > Dear Harjeet,> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > :-) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cheers !!!> > > > > > > > Ash -> <http://www.ashtro. <http://www.ashtro.ca> ca>> http://www.ashtro. <http://www.ashtro.ca> ca> > > > > > > > _____ > > > > > > > > astrologyandtiminge>

<%40>vents > > > > [astrologyandtiminge> <%40>vents ]> On Behalf Of> harjeet> > > > bakshi> > > > Thursday September 13, 2007 11:19 AM> > > > astrologyandtiminge> <%40>vents > > > > Re: Dear Ash et All :On the> > > Creation of> > > > Universe and Cosmology as applicable to> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Resp.

Ashji,> > > > more over current antra of rahu samdhari to venus and mars.> > > > mars have more points for 12th compared to 11th.> > > > venus has 20 for 11th and 17 for 12th.> > > > rahu in 9th house triggers 12th and 4th house.> > > > so mars points in ws and rahu's position points to more> expenditure in> > > > current antra.> > > > moreover antras of mars,saturn,moon,mercury and sun have lesspoints> > > > in worsheet for 11th house compared to 12th.> > > > only jupiter and venus have a just little more points in 11th> compared> > > > to 12th.> > > > plus the sav in 12th is more than 11th.> > > > dont we take mean of sav from sun,moon and lagna ?> > > > anything wrong in my thinking?> > > > thanks/regards> > > >

harjeet> > > > > > > > astrologyandtiminge> > > > <%40>> > > vents (AT) (DOT) <vents%40> com,> > > > "Ash" <kas@> wrote:> > > > >> > > > > Dear Amit,> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > With this data u have given,> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 19th May 1986> > > > > > > > > > 12:10 PM> > > > > > > > > > New Delhi> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> Planet> > > > > > > > > > Degrees> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > As> > > > > > > > > > 5 Le 38> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Su> > > > > > > > > > 5 Ta 14> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Mo> > > > > > > > > > 2 Vi 38> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Ma> > > > > > > > > > 27 Sg 51> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Me> > > > > > > > > > 0 Ta 39> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Ju> > > > > > > >

> > 25 Aq 40> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Ve> > > > > > > > > > 4 Ge 28> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > SaR> > > > > > > > > > 14 Sc 17> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Ra> > > > > > > > > > 5 Ar 44> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Ke> > > > > > > > > > 5 Li 44> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > House> > > > > > > > > > 1> > > >

> > > > > > 2> > > > > > > > > > 3> > > > > > > > > > 4> > > > > > > > > > 5> > > > > > > > > > 6> > > > > > > > > > 7> > > > > > > > > > 8> > > > > > > > > > 9> > > > > > > > > > 10> > > > > > > > > > 11> > > > > > > > > > 12> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Sun> > > > >> > > >> > >> >><file:///C:\Documents%20and%20Settings\ENagawkar\Desktop\KASMaster.xls#BAV!T> > > > > 7#BAV!T7> > > > > > > > > > > 10> > > > > > > > > > 3> > > > > > > > > > 3> > > > > > > > > > 4> > > > > > > > > > 5> > > > > > > > > > 5> > > > > > > > > > 4> > > > > > > > > > 4> > > > > > > > > > 3> > > > > > > > > > 1> > > > > > > > > > 4> > > > > > > > > > 6> > > > > > > > > > 6> > > > > > > > >

> 48> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Moon> > > > >> > > >> > >> >><file:///C:\Documents%20and%20Settings\ENagawkar\Desktop\KASMaster.xls#BAV!A> > > > > J7#BAV!AJ7> > > > > > > > > > > 2> > > > > > > > > > 4> > > > > > > > > > 6> > > > > > > > > > 4> > > > > > > > > > 4> > > > > > > > > > 4> > > > > > > > > > 4> > > > > > > > > > 6> > > > > > > > > > 5> > > > > > > > > > 3> > > > >

> > > > > 4> > > > > > > > > > 2> > > > > > > > > > 3> > > > > > > > > > 49> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Mars> > > > >> > > >> > >> >><file:///C:\Documents%20and%20Settings\ENagawkar\Desktop\KASMaster.xls#BAV!D> > > > > 34#BAV!D34> > > > > > > > > > > 5> > > > > > > > > > 2> > > > > > > > > > 4> > > > > > > > > > 4> > > > > > > > > > 4> > > > > > > > > > 2> > > > > > > > > > 4>

> > > > > > > > > 3> > > > > > > > > > 3> > > > > > > > > > 1> > > > > > > > > > 3> > > > > > > > > > 3> > > > > > > > > > 6> > > > > > > > > > 39> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Mercury> > > > >> > > >> > >> >><file:///C:\Documents%20and%20Settings\ENagawkar\Desktop\KASMaster.xls#BAV!T> > > > > 34#BAV!T34> > > > > > > > > > > 10> > > > > > > > > > 4> > > > > > > > > > 7> > > > > > >

> > > 5> > > > > > > > > > 2> > > > > > > > > > 4> > > > > > > > > > 6> > > > > > > > > > 4> > > > > > > > > > 4> > > > > > > > > > 4> > > > > > > > > > 3> > > > > > > > > > 5> > > > > > > > > > 6> > > > > > > > > > 54> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Jupiter> > > > >> > > >> > >> >><file:///C:\Documents%20and%20Settings\ENagawkar\Desktop\KASMaster.xls#BAV!A> > > > > J34#BAV!AJ34> > >

> > > > > > > > 7> > > > > > > > > > 4> > > > > > > > > > 4> > > > > > > > > > 5> > > > > > > > > > 4> > > > > > > > > > 4> > > > > > > > > > 6> > > > > > > > > > 5> > > > > > > > > > 7> > > > > > > > > > 4> > > > > > > > > > 5> > > > > > > > > > 4> > > > > > > > > > 4> > > > > > > > > > 56> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Venus> > > > >> > > >> > >>

>><file:///C:\Documents%20and%20Settings\ENagawkar\Desktop\KASMaster.xls#BAV!G> > > > > 61#BAV!G61> > > > > > > > > > > 11> > > > > > > > > > 5> > > > > > > > > > 6> > > > > > > > > > 6> > > > > > > > > > 4> > > > > > > > > > 4> > > > > > > > > > 4> > > > > > > > > > 3> > > > > > > > > > 5> > > > > > > > > > 5> > > > > > > > > > 2> > > > > > > > > > 4> > > > > > > > > > 4> > > > >

> > > > > 52> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Saturn> > > > >> > > >> > >> >><file:///C:\Documents%20and%20Settings\ENagawkar\Desktop\KASMaster.xls#BAV!T> > > > > 61#BAV!T61> > > > > > > > > > > 4> > > > > > > > > > 2> > > > > > > > > > 2> > > > > > > > > > 3> > > > > > > > > > 5> > > > > > > > > > 3> > > > > > > > > > 4> > > > > > > > > > 4> > > > > > > > > > 3> > > > > > > > > >

4> > > > > > > > > > 4> > > > > > > > > > 3> > > > > > > > > > 2> > > > > > > > > > 39> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Totals> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 24> > > > > > > > > > 32> > > > > > > > > > 31> > > > > > > > > > 28> > > > > > > > > > 26> > > > > > > > > > 32> > > > > > > > > > 29> > > > > > > > > > 30> > > > > > > > > > 22> > > > > > > > > >

25> > > > > > > > > > 27> > > > > > > > > > 31> > > > > > > > > > 337> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The points in 12th are more than 11th.> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > In any case, let it be.> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cheers !!!> > > > > > > > > > Ash -> <http://www.ashtro. <http://www.ashtro.> <http://www.ashtro.ca> ca> ca>> > > http://www.ashtro.> > > > <http://www.ashtro. <http://www.ashtro.ca> ca> ca> > > > > > > > > > _____ > > > > > > > > > > astrologyandtiminge> > > > <%40>> > > vents (AT) (DOT) <vents%40> com> > > > > [astrologyandtiminge> > > > <%40>> > > vents (AT) (DOT) <vents%40> com]> > > > On Behalf Of planck12> > > > > Wednesday September 12, 2007 7:58 PM> > > > > astrologyandtiminge> > > >

<%40>> > > vents (AT) (DOT) <vents%40> com> > > > > Re: Dear Ash et All :On the> > > > Creation of> > > > > Universe and Cosmology as applicable to> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Ash, > > > > > Yes, I completely concur and thats all I wanted to clarifyfrom my> > > > > end. Again before I leave I have another chart if anyone wants> > to use> > > > > from educational stand point. > > > > > > > > > > 19 May 1986> > > > > 12:10pm > > > > > new delhi. > > > > > > > > > > Again i decided to relate

the 11/12th house points, in thischart> > > > > again the worksheet decided to give more points in 11thhouse than> > > > > 12th. But the girl has no savings, he is quite spendrift andhave> > > > > numerous expenses as compared to her income. > > > > > > > > > > Also to double check other things, i decided to check other> factors,> > > > > her brillancy for that matter. I think she has two parts insaturn> > > > > degrees as shown with the work sheet. But she is not very> > intelligent,> > > > > again a decent girl who is quite jovial, but she has done a> > > > > certificate course and works in a local bank. As I understand it> > from> > > > > the notes if one part is in saturn then person has odinary> > > > > intelligence and

if two he/she has good intelligence. In her> > case she> > > > > is normal like anyone else who has no part in saturns division. > > > > > > > > > > Feel free to check, incase there are other things required,as is> > > > > always the case in terms of details. > > > > > > > > > > 1. The girl is unmarried> > > > > 2. Wheatish complexion > > > > > 3. works in a bank as teller > > > > > 4. From a middle class family> > > > > 5. Has good morals, but tends to be energetic and hyper attimes > > > > > > > > > > regards> > > > > Nicked Vish (Amit) I prefer Vish > > > > > > > > > > astrologyandtiminge> > > > >

<%40>> > > > vents (AT) (DOT) <vents%40> com,> > > > > "Ash" <kas@> wrote:> > > > > >> > > > > > Dear Amit / Vishy (?),> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Everyone is entitled to their own opinion and All the more> > reason we> > > > > should> > > > > > get back to KAS :-)> > > > > > > > > > > > Cheers !!!> > > > > > > > > > > > Ash -> <http://www.ashtro. <http://www.ashtro.> > > <http://www.ashtro. <http://www.ashtro.ca> ca>> > > > ca> ca>> > > > http://www.ashtro.> > > > > <http://www.ashtro. <http://www.ashtro.<http://www.ashtro.ca> ca>> ca> ca> > > > > > > > > > > > _____ > > > > > > > > > > > > astrologyandtiminge> > > > > <%40>> > > > vents (AT) (DOT) <vents%40> com> > > > > > [astrologyandtiminge> > > > > <%40>> > > >

vents (AT) (DOT) <vents%40> com]> > > > > On Behalf Of> > > > > astroquery12> > > > > > Wednesday September 12, 2007 7:11 PM> > > > > > astrologyandtiminge> > > > > <%40>> > > > vents (AT) (DOT) <vents%40> com> > > > > > Dear Ash et All :On the> > > > Creation of> > > > > > Universe and Cosmology as applicable to Astr> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > Hope you are doing well. This is Amit again, had postedunder a> > > > > > different name

prior but that account did not seem to work and> > > had to> > > > > > create a new id. > > > > > > > > > > > > I have been following the lessons for a while and again I> see many> > > > > > in-consistencies with the system. My intention is not to> refute or> > > > > > accept the system but purely to learn it and see it> > practicality and> > > > > > in the process provide my thoughts in opinions (after all the> > > > > > astrology forum is a free form for discussion). Some of my> > > doubts have> > > > > > cropped up again with the usual, 11th house points vs 12thhouse> > > > > > points and the actual condition of the charts (again this is> only> > > > > > treating the chart with KAS)as opposed

to mixing parashraor k.p> > > etc. > > > > > > > > > > > > On another note, perhaps I can take the liberty to explain> > again on> > > > > > why this happens and hopefully you concur with my points and> > facts.> > > > > > After all astrology will make more meaning if we understand it> > from> > > > > > all angles. You are a computer scientist (a man of science)> > yourself> > > > > > and perhaps this description will make sense and will take a> > purely> > > > > > scientific approach to it: > > > > > > > > > > > > I am sure you are familiar at least on the basic level with> > > Einstein's> > > > > > relativity and the other theory called Quantum Mechanics.> > During

the> > > > > > creation of the universe at the point of big bang it is widely> > > > > > believed that there were four fundamental forces in the> universe:> > > > > > Gravity, electromagnetic, weak nuclear and strong nuclear.It is> > > also> > > > > > now very well accepted that relativity explains Gravity very> > > elegantly> > > > > > and that the theory has been tested to the point ofcalculations> > > > > > pertaning to perhilion of mercury (closest pass to thesun) with> > > > > > accuracy. On the other hand Quantum mechanics has done well in> > > > > > unifying the other three forces of the electromagnetic and> nuclear> > > > > > nature. BUT a BIG TWIST comes into the picture. > > > > > > > >

> > > > Realivity claims that events (spacetime continum is 4D)are all> > > > > > associated together and there is no concept of past and> future or> > > > > > present and in simple terms the destiney is alreadywritten and> > > > > > nothing can change it, so given the right set of laws one can> > > predict> > > > > > the course of life and the cosmos (relativistic conditions on> > > > > > cosmology)to a complete accurate picture based on fundametal> field> > > > > > equations of einstein. Again Einstein spent much of his life> > > finding a> > > > > > Unified theory that would unify electromagnetics with> gravity BUT> > > > > FAILED. > > > > > > > > > > > > On the other hand QUANTUM MECHANICS

claims that nothing in> life is> > > > > > predictable infact everything is a probability. And QMexplains> > > atoms> > > > > > etc the world of sub atomic very well (this would include the> > brain)> > > > > > the body etc, after all brain is essential a complex neural> > network> > > > > > working on neurotransmitters signals which are electrical in> > > nature. > > > > > > So it is quite justified that QM is applicable to us as well> > > since we> > > > > > are made of atoms, eletrons etc. But the problem you run into> > > with QM> > > > > > is that nothing is certain and that everything isdescribed as a> > > > > > probablity wave function of something called thescrhorodingers> > > > >

> equation. I would want you to refer to the thought experiment> > termed> > > > > > "Schroender's Cat" which is hard for me to explain on thisfourm> > > but I> > > > > > am sure you will take the initiative of reading it, in short> every> > > > > > observation made my an reference observer will change the> > course of> > > > > > this obervation directly or indirectly depending on the> > observation> > > > > > being made. Simply put, there is too much random ness existent> > > in this> > > > > > universe to be able to describe anything in any accruancy,> > > especially> > > > > > when it comes to life or the atomic scale. > > > > > > > > > > > > Now applying the above theories to describe

astrology, many> of the> > > > > > General predictions we make about the past or even thefuture at> > > times> > > > > > happen to come true, yet there are many more predictionswe made> > > that> > > > > > do not come true at all. Because we are juggling between> > certainity> > > > > > and chaos and that is not the fault or positive aspect ofanyone> > > > > > astrological system but rather the law of nature (God ifyou may> > > call> > > > > > it). You have claimed in your past emails that KAS is very> > accurate> > > > > > however on my sincere application of these principles I have> > > found it> > > > > > smiliar to any other system because the rate of predicition> > does not> > >

> > > change much as compared to prashara or k.p or jaimini for that> > > > matter. > > > > > > > > > > > > It is however a different story if we only look at thepositive> > > aspect> > > > > > and not realise the shortcomings of any system. My approach is> > > to look> > > > > > at the short comings of this system simply because itmight help> > > > > > improve the system in some other way (again thats not job). My> > sole> > > > > > intention for this posting has been to again reiterate on a> > > scientific> > > > > > ground the limitations of astrology and that of human mind and> > > that no> > > > > > matter how hard we try we will be bound by manycontraints. You> > > might> >

> > > > claim that KAS predictions have come true, but I have applied> > basic> > > > > > principles of many charts some of which have yieldedresults but> > > again> > > > > > some of them have not yielded the correct results (this I see> > > with an> > > > > > open mind) leading me to believe and again affirm with the> > view that> > > > > > astrology has limitations on what can be predicted. Any when> > we are> > > > > > bound by such limitations then ethically we should take a more> > > > > > cautious approach in predicting in the first place andperhaps a> > > more> > > > > > understanding, less materialistic (making money out of> astrology)> > > > > > attitude in researching things. This would also

involve being> > > open to> > > > > > genuine thoughts weather pro or against any system in the> > betterment> > > > > > of knowledge. > > > > > > > > > > > > To end it Einstein once said "God does not play dice with the> > > > > > Universe" on seeing Quatum Mechanics back in the 30s he was> > > > > > diasspointed with QM because he felt there was no free will> > and that> > > > > > there was no such thing as probablity. A famous Quautum> > Theorist (I> > > > > > will let you figure out who) responded by saying "Not only> > does God> > > > > > play dice with Us, He also puts it in places where we cannot> find> > > > it". > > > > > > > > > > > > :) I hope you

see this message not as a threat to your> system but> > > > > > rather as an open ended question to ponder on keeping aside> > > > > > ego,predjuice or any other negative emotions. > > > > > > > > > > > > regards and Best> > > > > > Amit> > > > > >> > > > >> > > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Be a better Heartthrob. Get better relationship answers from someone> who knows.> > Answers - Check it out.> >> Be a better Heartthrob. Get better relationship answers from someone who knows. Answers - Check it out.

Fussy? Opinionated? Impossible to please? Perfect. Join 's user panel and lay it on us.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dear Anup, Harjeet and all, I would like to advice that once a chain is started on some topic or on a particular chat please do not mix up the chain with some other topic/ chart. Hope you understand my point. If it is mixed up with other topic, it becomes difficult for us to understand the chart that on what topic discussion was going on. For e.g. take this topic only.This topic was started by any one of our friend and it continues with some other topic. It will be better for us to stop the chain and pose the topic with some other chain so it will be easy for us to understand or to refer that chain. Please do not take it in other way. If you feel it is correct then OK otherwise also it is fine. Thanks and regards. Ramesh Mishra "Anup. M" <dalh_1 wrote: Sorry three zero in navamsa Anup"Anup. M" <dalh_1 > wrote: Dear Ash and Harjeet, This was the chart i was aking about, but here one zero in SAV and three zero in SAV if we take DST as no. February 16Th at 1:55 PM ( afternoon)(13:55) year 1976. born in

Washington DC ( USA). She is unmarried and her father requested for analysis for marriage prospetcs. I think Venus antra can give marriage. No Sat delay but Jup delay is there. I think Ash is right as he said that delay sometimes can be upto 30 years. Regards Anup harjeet bakshi <harjeet_bakshi > wrote: Dear Ashji,thanks for the reply.bonvoyage.would wait for more information on that.thanks/regardsharjeet , "Ash" <kas wrote:>> Dear

Harjeet,> > I have to rush to the airport, but I did have a brief chat withKrushanji> and ask him this scenario.> > 3 zereos in navamsa can cause delay, and reduce the happiness. Delay> sometimes maybe of 30 years.> > Thanks for asking this question. I also got some more insight intothis. :-)> > > > Cheers !!!> > Ash -> <http://www.ashtro.ca> http://www.ashtro.ca> > _____ > > > On Behalf Of Ash> Thursday September 13, 2007 1:31 PM> > RE: Re: Dear Ash et All :On theCreation> of Universe and Cosmology as applicable to> > > > Dear Hajreet,> > The delay calculations are as per the technique taught, i.e. say ifSa is in> 5th house in Navamsa so marriage can get delayed etc etc.> > 0's in Rasi chart are used to find delay, but 0 in d-chart has not been> specified by Krushnaji.> > 0's in D chart get covered in the basic strength calculation. > > > > Cheers !!!> > Ash -> <http://www.ashtro.ca> http://www.ashtro.ca> > _____ > > > On Behalf Of harjeet> bakshi> Thursday September 13, 2007 1:16 PM> > Re: Dear Ash et All :On theCreation of> Universe and Cosmology as applicable to> > > > Dear Anup,> wah wah!!> can you please give the birth data so other factors can be seen.> as per your question if i had to answer without considering other> factors... i am optimistic.. i would say delayed marriage :).> remember Krushnaji said.. 50% of effect by planet rest by efforts of> person. and if there are

blessing in chart or from up above..> thanks/regards> harjeet> > astrologyandtiminge> <%40>vents ,> "Anup. M"> <dalh_1@> wrote:> >> > Dear Harjeet ,> > > > "us shehar mein jao,to itna use kehna,> > baqi na sune koi, sirf tanha usay kehna,> > kuch log safar kay liye mozo'n (suitable) nahi hotay,> > kuch raaste kate nahi tanha,itna use kehna"> > > > Now tell me,how the quality of a marriage will be, if there is no> zero in SAV by any planet > > and three zero in navamsa :) and What about such case...denial or> delay of marriage??> > > > Regards> > Anup> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > harjeet bakshi <harjeet_bakshi@> wrote:> > Dear Ashji,> > whenever one of my teacher used to give me smile.. i used to do> > something wrong in solving a problem... but she would not tell me till> > i asked her.> > so did i do something wrong?> > thanks/regards> > harjeet> > > > astrologyandtiminge> <%40>vents ,> "ashsam73" <kas@>> > wrote:> > >> > > Dear Harjeet,> > > > > > :-)> > > > > > Cheers !!!> > > Ash -> http://www.ashtro. <http://www.ashtro.ca> ca> > > > >

> astrologyandtiminge> <%40>vents ,> "Ash" <kas@> wrote:> > > >> > > > Dear Harjeet,> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > :-) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cheers !!!> > > > > > > > Ash -> <http://www.ashtro. <http://www.ashtro.ca> ca>> http://www.ashtro. <http://www.ashtro.ca> ca> > > > > > > > _____ > > > > > > > > astrologyandtiminge>

<%40>vents > > > > [astrologyandtiminge> <%40>vents ]> On Behalf Of> harjeet> > > > bakshi> > > > Thursday September 13, 2007 11:19 AM> > > > astrologyandtiminge> <%40>vents > > > > Re: Dear Ash et All :On the> > > Creation of> > > > Universe and Cosmology as applicable to> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Resp.

Ashji,> > > > more over current antra of rahu samdhari to venus and mars.> > > > mars have more points for 12th compared to 11th.> > > > venus has 20 for 11th and 17 for 12th.> > > > rahu in 9th house triggers 12th and 4th house.> > > > so mars points in ws and rahu's position points to more> expenditure in> > > > current antra.> > > > moreover antras of mars,saturn,moon,mercury and sun have lesspoints> > > > in worsheet for 11th house compared to 12th.> > > > only jupiter and venus have a just little more points in 11th> compared> > > > to 12th.> > > > plus the sav in 12th is more than 11th.> > > > dont we take mean of sav from sun,moon and lagna ?> > > > anything wrong in my thinking?> > > > thanks/regards> > > >

harjeet> > > > > > > > astrologyandtiminge> > > > <%40>> > > vents (AT) (DOT) <vents%40> com,> > > > "Ash" <kas@> wrote:> > > > >> > > > > Dear Amit,> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > With this data u have given,> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 19th May 1986> > > > > > > > > > 12:10 PM> > > > > > > > > > New Delhi> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> Planet> > > > > > > > > > Degrees> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > As> > > > > > > > > > 5 Le 38> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Su> > > > > > > > > > 5 Ta 14> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Mo> > > > > > > > > > 2 Vi 38> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Ma> > > > > > > > > > 27 Sg 51> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Me> > > > > > > > > > 0 Ta 39> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Ju> > > > > > > >

> > 25 Aq 40> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Ve> > > > > > > > > > 4 Ge 28> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > SaR> > > > > > > > > > 14 Sc 17> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Ra> > > > > > > > > > 5 Ar 44> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Ke> > > > > > > > > > 5 Li 44> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > House> > > > > > > > > > 1> > > >

> > > > > > 2> > > > > > > > > > 3> > > > > > > > > > 4> > > > > > > > > > 5> > > > > > > > > > 6> > > > > > > > > > 7> > > > > > > > > > 8> > > > > > > > > > 9> > > > > > > > > > 10> > > > > > > > > > 11> > > > > > > > > > 12> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Sun> > > > >> > > >> > >> >><file:///C:\Documents%20and%20Settings\ENagawkar\Desktop\KASMaster.xls#BAV!T> > > > > 7#BAV!T7> > > > > > > > > > > 10> > > > > > > > > > 3> > > > > > > > > > 3> > > > > > > > > > 4> > > > > > > > > > 5> > > > > > > > > > 5> > > > > > > > > > 4> > > > > > > > > > 4> > > > > > > > > > 3> > > > > > > > > > 1> > > > > > > > > > 4> > > > > > > > > > 6> > > > > > > > > > 6> > > > > > > > >

> 48> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Moon> > > > >> > > >> > >> >><file:///C:\Documents%20and%20Settings\ENagawkar\Desktop\KASMaster.xls#BAV!A> > > > > J7#BAV!AJ7> > > > > > > > > > > 2> > > > > > > > > > 4> > > > > > > > > > 6> > > > > > > > > > 4> > > > > > > > > > 4> > > > > > > > > > 4> > > > > > > > > > 4> > > > > > > > > > 6> > > > > > > > > > 5> > > > > > > > > > 3> > > > >

> > > > > 4> > > > > > > > > > 2> > > > > > > > > > 3> > > > > > > > > > 49> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Mars> > > > >> > > >> > >> >><file:///C:\Documents%20and%20Settings\ENagawkar\Desktop\KASMaster.xls#BAV!D> > > > > 34#BAV!D34> > > > > > > > > > > 5> > > > > > > > > > 2> > > > > > > > > > 4> > > > > > > > > > 4> > > > > > > > > > 4> > > > > > > > > > 2> > > > > > > > > > 4>

> > > > > > > > > 3> > > > > > > > > > 3> > > > > > > > > > 1> > > > > > > > > > 3> > > > > > > > > > 3> > > > > > > > > > 6> > > > > > > > > > 39> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Mercury> > > > >> > > >> > >> >><file:///C:\Documents%20and%20Settings\ENagawkar\Desktop\KASMaster.xls#BAV!T> > > > > 34#BAV!T34> > > > > > > > > > > 10> > > > > > > > > > 4> > > > > > > > > > 7> > > > > > >

> > > 5> > > > > > > > > > 2> > > > > > > > > > 4> > > > > > > > > > 6> > > > > > > > > > 4> > > > > > > > > > 4> > > > > > > > > > 4> > > > > > > > > > 3> > > > > > > > > > 5> > > > > > > > > > 6> > > > > > > > > > 54> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Jupiter> > > > >> > > >> > >> >><file:///C:\Documents%20and%20Settings\ENagawkar\Desktop\KASMaster.xls#BAV!A> > > > > J34#BAV!AJ34> > >

> > > > > > > > 7> > > > > > > > > > 4> > > > > > > > > > 4> > > > > > > > > > 5> > > > > > > > > > 4> > > > > > > > > > 4> > > > > > > > > > 6> > > > > > > > > > 5> > > > > > > > > > 7> > > > > > > > > > 4> > > > > > > > > > 5> > > > > > > > > > 4> > > > > > > > > > 4> > > > > > > > > > 56> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Venus> > > > >> > > >> > >>

>><file:///C:\Documents%20and%20Settings\ENagawkar\Desktop\KASMaster.xls#BAV!G> > > > > 61#BAV!G61> > > > > > > > > > > 11> > > > > > > > > > 5> > > > > > > > > > 6> > > > > > > > > > 6> > > > > > > > > > 4> > > > > > > > > > 4> > > > > > > > > > 4> > > > > > > > > > 3> > > > > > > > > > 5> > > > > > > > > > 5> > > > > > > > > > 2> > > > > > > > > > 4> > > > > > > > > > 4> > > > >

> > > > > 52> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Saturn> > > > >> > > >> > >> >><file:///C:\Documents%20and%20Settings\ENagawkar\Desktop\KASMaster.xls#BAV!T> > > > > 61#BAV!T61> > > > > > > > > > > 4> > > > > > > > > > 2> > > > > > > > > > 2> > > > > > > > > > 3> > > > > > > > > > 5> > > > > > > > > > 3> > > > > > > > > > 4> > > > > > > > > > 4> > > > > > > > > > 3> > > > > > > > > >

4> > > > > > > > > > 4> > > > > > > > > > 3> > > > > > > > > > 2> > > > > > > > > > 39> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Totals> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 24> > > > > > > > > > 32> > > > > > > > > > 31> > > > > > > > > > 28> > > > > > > > > > 26> > > > > > > > > > 32> > > > > > > > > > 29> > > > > > > > > > 30> > > > > > > > > > 22> > > > > > > > > >

25> > > > > > > > > > 27> > > > > > > > > > 31> > > > > > > > > > 337> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The points in 12th are more than 11th.> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > In any case, let it be.> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cheers !!!> > > > > > > > > > Ash -> <http://www.ashtro. <http://www.ashtro.> <http://www.ashtro.ca> ca> ca>> > > http://www.ashtro.> > > > <http://www.ashtro. <http://www.ashtro.ca> ca> ca> > > > > > > > > > _____ > > > > > > > > > > astrologyandtiminge> > > > <%40>> > > vents (AT) (DOT) <vents%40> com> > > > > [astrologyandtiminge> > > > <%40>> > > vents (AT) (DOT) <vents%40> com]> > > > On Behalf Of planck12> > > > > Wednesday September 12, 2007 7:58 PM> > > > > astrologyandtiminge> > > >

<%40>> > > vents (AT) (DOT) <vents%40> com> > > > > Re: Dear Ash et All :On the> > > > Creation of> > > > > Universe and Cosmology as applicable to> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Ash, > > > > > Yes, I completely concur and thats all I wanted to clarifyfrom my> > > > > end. Again before I leave I have another chart if anyone wants> > to use> > > > > from educational stand point. > > > > > > > > > > 19 May 1986> > > > > 12:10pm > > > > > new delhi. > > > > > > > > > > Again i decided to relate

the 11/12th house points, in thischart> > > > > again the worksheet decided to give more points in 11thhouse than> > > > > 12th. But the girl has no savings, he is quite spendrift andhave> > > > > numerous expenses as compared to her income. > > > > > > > > > > Also to double check other things, i decided to check other> factors,> > > > > her brillancy for that matter. I think she has two parts insaturn> > > > > degrees as shown with the work sheet. But she is not very> > intelligent,> > > > > again a decent girl who is quite jovial, but she has done a> > > > > certificate course and works in a local bank. As I understand it> > from> > > > > the notes if one part is in saturn then person has odinary> > > > > intelligence and

if two he/she has good intelligence. In her> > case she> > > > > is normal like anyone else who has no part in saturns division. > > > > > > > > > > Feel free to check, incase there are other things required,as is> > > > > always the case in terms of details. > > > > > > > > > > 1. The girl is unmarried> > > > > 2. Wheatish complexion > > > > > 3. works in a bank as teller > > > > > 4. From a middle class family> > > > > 5. Has good morals, but tends to be energetic and hyper attimes > > > > > > > > > > regards> > > > > Nicked Vish (Amit) I prefer Vish > > > > > > > > > > astrologyandtiminge> > > > >

<%40>> > > > vents (AT) (DOT) <vents%40> com,> > > > > "Ash" <kas@> wrote:> > > > > >> > > > > > Dear Amit / Vishy (?),> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Everyone is entitled to their own opinion and All the more> > reason we> > > > > should> > > > > > get back to KAS :-)> > > > > > > > > > > > Cheers !!!> > > > > > > > > > > > Ash -> <http://www.ashtro. <http://www.ashtro.> > > <http://www.ashtro. <http://www.ashtro.ca> ca>> > > > ca> ca>> > > > http://www.ashtro.> > > > > <http://www.ashtro. <http://www.ashtro.<http://www.ashtro.ca> ca>> ca> ca> > > > > > > > > > > > _____ > > > > > > > > > > > > astrologyandtiminge> > > > > <%40>> > > > vents (AT) (DOT) <vents%40> com> > > > > > [astrologyandtiminge> > > > > <%40>> > > >

vents (AT) (DOT) <vents%40> com]> > > > > On Behalf Of> > > > > astroquery12> > > > > > Wednesday September 12, 2007 7:11 PM> > > > > > astrologyandtiminge> > > > > <%40>> > > > vents (AT) (DOT) <vents%40> com> > > > > > Dear Ash et All :On the> > > > Creation of> > > > > > Universe and Cosmology as applicable to Astr> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > Hope you are doing well. This is Amit again, had postedunder a> > > > > > different name

prior but that account did not seem to work and> > > had to> > > > > > create a new id. > > > > > > > > > > > > I have been following the lessons for a while and again I> see many> > > > > > in-consistencies with the system. My intention is not to> refute or> > > > > > accept the system but purely to learn it and see it> > practicality and> > > > > > in the process provide my thoughts in opinions (after all the> > > > > > astrology forum is a free form for discussion). Some of my> > > doubts have> > > > > > cropped up again with the usual, 11th house points vs 12thhouse> > > > > > points and the actual condition of the charts (again this is> only> > > > > > treating the chart with KAS)as opposed

to mixing parashraor k.p> > > etc. > > > > > > > > > > > > On another note, perhaps I can take the liberty to explain> > again on> > > > > > why this happens and hopefully you concur with my points and> > facts.> > > > > > After all astrology will make more meaning if we understand it> > from> > > > > > all angles. You are a computer scientist (a man of science)> > yourself> > > > > > and perhaps this description will make sense and will take a> > purely> > > > > > scientific approach to it: > > > > > > > > > > > > I am sure you are familiar at least on the basic level with> > > Einstein's> > > > > > relativity and the other theory called Quantum Mechanics.> > During

the> > > > > > creation of the universe at the point of big bang it is widely> > > > > > believed that there were four fundamental forces in the> universe:> > > > > > Gravity, electromagnetic, weak nuclear and strong nuclear.It is> > > also> > > > > > now very well accepted that relativity explains Gravity very> > > elegantly> > > > > > and that the theory has been tested to the point ofcalculations> > > > > > pertaning to perhilion of mercury (closest pass to thesun) with> > > > > > accuracy. On the other hand Quantum mechanics has done well in> > > > > > unifying the other three forces of the electromagnetic and> nuclear> > > > > > nature. BUT a BIG TWIST comes into the picture. > > > > > > > >

> > > > Realivity claims that events (spacetime continum is 4D)are all> > > > > > associated together and there is no concept of past and> future or> > > > > > present and in simple terms the destiney is alreadywritten and> > > > > > nothing can change it, so given the right set of laws one can> > > predict> > > > > > the course of life and the cosmos (relativistic conditions on> > > > > > cosmology)to a complete accurate picture based on fundametal> field> > > > > > equations of einstein. Again Einstein spent much of his life> > > finding a> > > > > > Unified theory that would unify electromagnetics with> gravity BUT> > > > > FAILED. > > > > > > > > > > > > On the other hand QUANTUM MECHANICS

claims that nothing in> life is> > > > > > predictable infact everything is a probability. And QMexplains> > > atoms> > > > > > etc the world of sub atomic very well (this would include the> > brain)> > > > > > the body etc, after all brain is essential a complex neural> > network> > > > > > working on neurotransmitters signals which are electrical in> > > nature. > > > > > > So it is quite justified that QM is applicable to us as well> > > since we> > > > > > are made of atoms, eletrons etc. But the problem you run into> > > with QM> > > > > > is that nothing is certain and that everything isdescribed as a> > > > > > probablity wave function of something called thescrhorodingers> > > > >

> equation. I would want you to refer to the thought experiment> > termed> > > > > > "Schroender's Cat" which is hard for me to explain on thisfourm> > > but I> > > > > > am sure you will take the initiative of reading it, in short> every> > > > > > observation made my an reference observer will change the> > course of> > > > > > this obervation directly or indirectly depending on the> > observation> > > > > > being made. Simply put, there is too much random ness existent> > > in this> > > > > > universe to be able to describe anything in any accruancy,> > > especially> > > > > > when it comes to life or the atomic scale. > > > > > > > > > > > > Now applying the above theories to describe

astrology, many> of the> > > > > > General predictions we make about the past or even thefuture at> > > times> > > > > > happen to come true, yet there are many more predictionswe made> > > that> > > > > > do not come true at all. Because we are juggling between> > certainity> > > > > > and chaos and that is not the fault or positive aspect ofanyone> > > > > > astrological system but rather the law of nature (God ifyou may> > > call> > > > > > it). You have claimed in your past emails that KAS is very> > accurate> > > > > > however on my sincere application of these principles I have> > > found it> > > > > > smiliar to any other system because the rate of predicition> > does not> > >

> > > change much as compared to prashara or k.p or jaimini for that> > > > matter. > > > > > > > > > > > > It is however a different story if we only look at thepositive> > > aspect> > > > > > and not realise the shortcomings of any system. My approach is> > > to look> > > > > > at the short comings of this system simply because itmight help> > > > > > improve the system in some other way (again thats not job). My> > sole> > > > > > intention for this posting has been to again reiterate on a> > > scientific> > > > > > ground the limitations of astrology and that of human mind and> > > that no> > > > > > matter how hard we try we will be bound by manycontraints. You> > > might> >

> > > > claim that KAS predictions have come true, but I have applied> > basic> > > > > > principles of many charts some of which have yieldedresults but> > > again> > > > > > some of them have not yielded the correct results (this I see> > > with an> > > > > > open mind) leading me to believe and again affirm with the> > view that> > > > > > astrology has limitations on what can be predicted. Any when> > we are> > > > > > bound by such limitations then ethically we should take a more> > > > > > cautious approach in predicting in the first place andperhaps a> > > more> > > > > > understanding, less materialistic (making money out of> astrology)> > > > > > attitude in researching things. This would also

involve being> > > open to> > > > > > genuine thoughts weather pro or against any system in the> > betterment> > > > > > of knowledge. > > > > > > > > > > > > To end it Einstein once said "God does not play dice with the> > > > > > Universe" on seeing Quatum Mechanics back in the 30s he was> > > > > > diasspointed with QM because he felt there was no free will> > and that> > > > > > there was no such thing as probablity. A famous Quautum> > Theorist (I> > > > > > will let you figure out who) responded by saying "Not only> > does God> > > > > > play dice with Us, He also puts it in places where we cannot> find> > > > it". > > > > > > > > > > > > :) I hope you

see this message not as a threat to your> system but> > > > > > rather as an open ended question to ponder on keeping aside> > > > > > ego,predjuice or any other negative emotions. > > > > > > > > > > > > regards and Best> > > > > > Amit> > > > > >> > > > >> > > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Be a better Heartthrob. Get better relationship answers from someone> who knows.> > Answers - Check it out.> >> Be a better Heartthrob. Get better relationship answers from someone who knows. Answers - Check it out. Fussy? Opinionated? Impossible to please? Perfect. Join 's user panel and lay it on us.

5, 50, 500, 5000 - Store N number of mails in your inbox.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dear Ramesh, The topic was changed deliberately as you know this was started by the same person bearing some other ID.Also, if you note the contents of all his previous mails, i dont think we will be learning something out of this except wasting our time. Just note the words Ash has used after finishing his reply to his mail "The points in 12th are more than 11th, in any case let it be." I hope you will understand that we all are here to learn and can not accept less than KAS here:) I was also expecting your comments being a senior on this topic. Your views and experience is also worth for a junior like me. Regards Anup ramesh mishra <aarceemastro2002 wrote: Dear Anup, Harjeet and all, I would like to advice that once a chain is started on some topic or on a particular chat please do not mix up the chain with some other topic/ chart. Hope you

understand my point. If it is mixed up with other topic, it becomes difficult for us to understand the chart that on what topic discussion was going on. For e.g. take this topic only.This topic was started by any one of our friend and it continues with some other topic. It will be better for us to stop the chain and pose the topic with some other chain so it will be easy for us to understand or to refer that chain. Please do not take it in other way. If you feel it is correct then OK otherwise also it is fine. Thanks and regards. Ramesh Mishra "Anup. M" <dalh_1 > wrote: Sorry three zero in navamsa Anup"Anup. M" <dalh_1 > wrote: Dear Ash and Harjeet, This was the chart i was aking about, but here one zero in SAV and three zero in SAV if we take DST as no. February 16Th at 1:55 PM ( afternoon)(13:55) year 1976. born in Washington DC ( USA). She is unmarried and her father requested for analysis for marriage prospetcs. I think Venus antra can give marriage. No Sat delay but Jup delay is there. I think Ash is right as he said that delay sometimes can be upto 30 years. Regards Anup harjeet bakshi

<harjeet_bakshi > wrote: Dear Ashji,thanks for the reply.bonvoyage.would wait for more information on that.thanks/regardsharjeet , "Ash" <kas wrote:>> Dear Harjeet,> > I have to rush to the airport, but I did have a brief chat withKrushanji> and ask him this scenario.> > 3 zereos in navamsa can cause delay, and reduce the happiness. Delay> sometimes maybe of 30 years.> > Thanks for asking this question. I also got some more insight intothis. :-)> > > > Cheers !!!> > Ash -> <http://www.ashtro.ca> http://www.ashtro.ca> > _____ > > > On Behalf Of Ash> Thursday September 13, 2007 1:31 PM> > RE: Re: Dear Ash et All :On theCreation> of Universe and Cosmology as applicable to> > > > Dear Hajreet,> > The delay calculations are as per the technique taught, i.e. say ifSa is in> 5th house in Navamsa so marriage can get delayed etc etc.> > 0's in Rasi chart are used to find delay, but 0 in d-chart has not

been> specified by Krushnaji.> > 0's in D chart get covered in the basic strength calculation. > > > > Cheers !!!> > Ash -> <http://www.ashtro.ca> http://www.ashtro.ca> > _____ > > > On Behalf Of harjeet> bakshi> Thursday September 13, 2007 1:16 PM> > Re: Dear Ash et All :On theCreation of> Universe and Cosmology as applicable to> >

> > Dear Anup,> wah wah!!> can you please give the birth data so other factors can be seen.> as per your question if i had to answer without considering other> factors... i am optimistic.. i would say delayed marriage :).> remember Krushnaji said.. 50% of effect by planet rest by efforts of> person. and if there are blessing in chart or from up above..> thanks/regards> harjeet> > astrologyandtiminge> <%40>vents ,> "Anup. M"> <dalh_1@> wrote:> >> > Dear Harjeet ,> > > > "us shehar mein jao,to itna use kehna,> > baqi na sune koi, sirf tanha usay kehna,> > kuch log safar kay liye mozo'n (suitable) nahi hotay,> > kuch raaste kate nahi tanha,itna use

kehna"> > > > Now tell me,how the quality of a marriage will be, if there is no> zero in SAV by any planet > > and three zero in navamsa :) and What about such case...denial or> delay of marriage??> > > > Regards> > Anup> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > harjeet bakshi <harjeet_bakshi@> wrote:> > Dear Ashji,> > whenever one of my teacher used to give me smile.. i used to do> > something wrong in solving a problem... but she would not tell me till> > i asked her.> > so did i do something wrong?> > thanks/regards> > harjeet> > > > astrologyandtiminge> <%40>vents ,> "ashsam73" <kas@>> > wrote:> > >> > > Dear Harjeet,> > > > > > :-)> > > > > > Cheers !!!> > > Ash -> http://www.ashtro. <http://www.ashtro.ca> ca> > > > > > astrologyandtiminge> <%40>vents ,> "Ash" <kas@> wrote:> > > >> > > > Dear Harjeet,> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > :-) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cheers !!!> > > > > > > > Ash

-> <http://www.ashtro. <http://www.ashtro.ca> ca>> http://www.ashtro. <http://www.ashtro.ca> ca> > > > > > > > _____ > > > > > > > > astrologyandtiminge> <%40>vents > > > > [astrologyandtiminge> <%40>vents ]> On Behalf Of> harjeet> > > > bakshi> > > > Thursday September 13, 2007 11:19 AM> > > > astrologyandtiminge>

<%40>vents > > > > Re: Dear Ash et All :On the> > > Creation of> > > > Universe and Cosmology as applicable to> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Resp. Ashji,> > > > more over current antra of rahu samdhari to venus and mars.> > > > mars have more points for 12th compared to 11th.> > > > venus has 20 for 11th and 17 for 12th.> > > > rahu in 9th house triggers 12th and 4th house.> > > > so mars points in ws and rahu's position points to more> expenditure in> > > > current antra.> > > > moreover antras of mars,saturn,moon,mercury and sun have lesspoints> > >

> in worsheet for 11th house compared to 12th.> > > > only jupiter and venus have a just little more points in 11th> compared> > > > to 12th.> > > > plus the sav in 12th is more than 11th.> > > > dont we take mean of sav from sun,moon and lagna ?> > > > anything wrong in my thinking?> > > > thanks/regards> > > > harjeet> > > > > > > > astrologyandtiminge> > > > <%40>> > > vents (AT) (DOT) <vents%40> com,> > > > "Ash" <kas@> wrote:> > > > >> > > > > Dear Amit,> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > With this data u have given,> > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 19th May 1986> > > > > > > > > > 12:10 PM> > > > > > > > > > New Delhi> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Planet> > > > > > > > > > Degrees> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > As> > > > > > > > > > 5 Le 38> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Su> > > > > > > > > > 5 Ta 14> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Mo> > > > > > > > > > 2 Vi 38> >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > Ma> > > > > > > > > > 27 Sg 51> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Me> > > > > > > > > > 0 Ta 39> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Ju> > > > > > > > > > 25 Aq 40> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Ve> > > > > > > > > > 4 Ge 28> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > SaR> > > > > > > > > > 14 Sc 17> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Ra> > > > > > > > > > 5 Ar 44> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > Ke> > > > > > > > > > 5 Li 44> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > House> > > > > > > > > > 1> > > > > > > > > > 2> > > > > > > > > > 3> > > > > > > > > > 4> > > > > > > > > > 5> > > > > > > > > > 6> > > > > > > > > > 7> > > > > > > > > > 8> > > > > > > > > > 9> > > > > > > > > > 10> > > > > > > >

> > 11> > > > > > > > > > 12> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Sun> > > > >> > > >> > >> >><file:///C:\Documents%20and%20Settings\ENagawkar\Desktop\KASMaster.xls#BAV!T> > > > > 7#BAV!T7> > > > > > > > > > > 10> > > > > > > > > > 3> > > > > > > > > > 3> > > > > > > > > > 4> > > > > > > > > > 5> > > > > > > > > > 5> > > > > > > > > > 4> > > > > > > > > > 4> > > > >

> > > > > 3> > > > > > > > > > 1> > > > > > > > > > 4> > > > > > > > > > 6> > > > > > > > > > 6> > > > > > > > > > 48> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Moon> > > > >> > > >> > >> >><file:///C:\Documents%20and%20Settings\ENagawkar\Desktop\KASMaster.xls#BAV!A> > > > > J7#BAV!AJ7> > > > > > > > > > > 2> > > > > > > > > > 4> > > > > > > > > > 6> > > > > > > > > > 4> > > > > > > > > > 4>

> > > > > > > > > 4> > > > > > > > > > 4> > > > > > > > > > 6> > > > > > > > > > 5> > > > > > > > > > 3> > > > > > > > > > 4> > > > > > > > > > 2> > > > > > > > > > 3> > > > > > > > > > 49> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Mars> > > > >> > > >> > >> >><file:///C:\Documents%20and%20Settings\ENagawkar\Desktop\KASMaster.xls#BAV!D> > > > > 34#BAV!D34> > > > > > > > > > > 5> > > > > > > >

> > 2> > > > > > > > > > 4> > > > > > > > > > 4> > > > > > > > > > 4> > > > > > > > > > 2> > > > > > > > > > 4> > > > > > > > > > 3> > > > > > > > > > 3> > > > > > > > > > 1> > > > > > > > > > 3> > > > > > > > > > 3> > > > > > > > > > 6> > > > > > > > > > 39> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Mercury> > > > >> > > >> > >> >><file:///C:\Documents%20and%20Settings\ENagawkar\Desktop\KASMaster.xls#BAV!T> > > > > 34#BAV!T34> > > > > > > > > > > 10> > > > > > > > > > 4> > > > > > > > > > 7> > > > > > > > > > 5> > > > > > > > > > 2> > > > > > > > > > 4> > > > > > > > > > 6> > > > > > > > > > 4> > > > > > > > > > 4> > > > > > > > > > 4> > > > > > > > > > 3> > > > > > > > > > 5> > > > > > > > > > 6> > > > > > > > >

> 54> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Jupiter> > > > >> > > >> > >> >><file:///C:\Documents%20and%20Settings\ENagawkar\Desktop\KASMaster.xls#BAV!A> > > > > J34#BAV!AJ34> > > > > > > > > > > 7> > > > > > > > > > 4> > > > > > > > > > 4> > > > > > > > > > 5> > > > > > > > > > 4> > > > > > > > > > 4> > > > > > > > > > 6> > > > > > > > > > 5> > > > > > > > > > 7> > > > > > > > > > 4> > > >

> > > > > > 5> > > > > > > > > > 4> > > > > > > > > > 4> > > > > > > > > > 56> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Venus> > > > >> > > >> > >> >><file:///C:\Documents%20and%20Settings\ENagawkar\Desktop\KASMaster.xls#BAV!G> > > > > 61#BAV!G61> > > > > > > > > > > 11> > > > > > > > > > 5> > > > > > > > > > 6> > > > > > > > > > 6> > > > > > > > > > 4> > > > > > > > > > 4> > > > > > > > > >

4> > > > > > > > > > 3> > > > > > > > > > 5> > > > > > > > > > 5> > > > > > > > > > 2> > > > > > > > > > 4> > > > > > > > > > 4> > > > > > > > > > 52> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Saturn> > > > >> > > >> > >> >><file:///C:\Documents%20and%20Settings\ENagawkar\Desktop\KASMaster.xls#BAV!T> > > > > 61#BAV!T61> > > > > > > > > > > 4> > > > > > > > > > 2> > > > > > > > > > 2> > > > >

> > > > > 3> > > > > > > > > > 5> > > > > > > > > > 3> > > > > > > > > > 4> > > > > > > > > > 4> > > > > > > > > > 3> > > > > > > > > > 4> > > > > > > > > > 4> > > > > > > > > > 3> > > > > > > > > > 2> > > > > > > > > > 39> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Totals> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 24> > > > > > > > > > 32> > > > > > > > > > 31> > > > >

> > > > > 28> > > > > > > > > > 26> > > > > > > > > > 32> > > > > > > > > > 29> > > > > > > > > > 30> > > > > > > > > > 22> > > > > > > > > > 25> > > > > > > > > > 27> > > > > > > > > > 31> > > > > > > > > > 337> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The points in 12th are more than 11th.> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > In any case, let it be.> > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > Cheers !!!> > > > > > > > > > Ash -> <http://www.ashtro. <http://www.ashtro.> <http://www.ashtro.ca> ca> ca>> > > http://www.ashtro.> > > > <http://www.ashtro. <http://www.ashtro.ca> ca> ca> > > > > > > > > > _____ > > > > > > > > > > astrologyandtiminge> > > > <%40>> > > vents (AT) (DOT) <vents%40> com> > > > > [astrologyandtiminge> > >

> <%40>> > > vents (AT) (DOT) <vents%40> com]> > > > On Behalf Of planck12> > > > > Wednesday September 12, 2007 7:58 PM> > > > > astrologyandtiminge> > > > <%40>> > > vents (AT) (DOT) <vents%40> com> > > > > Re: Dear Ash et All :On the> > > > Creation of> > > > > Universe and Cosmology as applicable to> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Ash, > > > > > Yes, I completely concur and thats all I wanted to clarifyfrom my> > > > > end. Again

before I leave I have another chart if anyone wants> > to use> > > > > from educational stand point. > > > > > > > > > > 19 May 1986> > > > > 12:10pm > > > > > new delhi. > > > > > > > > > > Again i decided to relate the 11/12th house points, in thischart> > > > > again the worksheet decided to give more points in 11thhouse than> > > > > 12th. But the girl has no savings, he is quite spendrift andhave> > > > > numerous expenses as compared to her income. > > > > > > > > > > Also to double check other things, i decided to check other> factors,> > > > > her brillancy for that matter. I think she has two parts insaturn> > > > > degrees as shown with the work sheet. But she is not

very> > intelligent,> > > > > again a decent girl who is quite jovial, but she has done a> > > > > certificate course and works in a local bank. As I understand it> > from> > > > > the notes if one part is in saturn then person has odinary> > > > > intelligence and if two he/she has good intelligence. In her> > case she> > > > > is normal like anyone else who has no part in saturns division. > > > > > > > > > > Feel free to check, incase there are other things required,as is> > > > > always the case in terms of details. > > > > > > > > > > 1. The girl is unmarried> > > > > 2. Wheatish complexion > > > > > 3. works in a bank as teller > > > > > 4. From a middle class family> > > >

> 5. Has good morals, but tends to be energetic and hyper attimes > > > > > > > > > > regards> > > > > Nicked Vish (Amit) I prefer Vish > > > > > > > > > > astrologyandtiminge> > > > > <%40>> > > > vents (AT) (DOT) <vents%40> com,> > > > > "Ash" <kas@> wrote:> > > > > >> > > > > > Dear Amit / Vishy (?),> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Everyone is entitled to their own opinion and All the more> > reason we> > > > > should> > > > > > get back to KAS :-)> > > > > > > > > >

> > Cheers !!!> > > > > > > > > > > > Ash -> <http://www.ashtro. <http://www.ashtro.> > > <http://www.ashtro. <http://www.ashtro.ca> ca>> > > > ca> ca>> > > > http://www.ashtro.> > > > > <http://www.ashtro. <http://www.ashtro.<http://www.ashtro.ca> ca>> ca> ca> > > > > > > > > > > > _____ > > > > > > > > > > > > astrologyandtiminge> > > > >

<%40>> > > > vents (AT) (DOT) <vents%40> com> > > > > > [astrologyandtiminge> > > > > <%40>> > > > vents (AT) (DOT) <vents%40> com]> > > > > On Behalf Of> > > > > astroquery12> > > > > > Wednesday September 12, 2007 7:11 PM> > > > > > astrologyandtiminge> > > > > <%40>> > > > vents (AT) (DOT) <vents%40> com> > > > > > Dear Ash et All :On the> > > > Creation of> >

> > > > Universe and Cosmology as applicable to Astr> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > Hope you are doing well. This is Amit again, had postedunder a> > > > > > different name prior but that account did not seem to work and> > > had to> > > > > > create a new id. > > > > > > > > > > > > I have been following the lessons for a while and again I> see many> > > > > > in-consistencies with the system. My intention is not to> refute or> > > > > > accept the system but purely to learn it and see it> > practicality and> > > > > > in the process provide my thoughts in opinions (after all the> > > > > > astrology forum

is a free form for discussion). Some of my> > > doubts have> > > > > > cropped up again with the usual, 11th house points vs 12thhouse> > > > > > points and the actual condition of the charts (again this is> only> > > > > > treating the chart with KAS)as opposed to mixing parashraor k.p> > > etc. > > > > > > > > > > > > On another note, perhaps I can take the liberty to explain> > again on> > > > > > why this happens and hopefully you concur with my points and> > facts.> > > > > > After all astrology will make more meaning if we understand it> > from> > > > > > all angles. You are a computer scientist (a man of science)> > yourself> > > > > > and perhaps this description will make sense and will

take a> > purely> > > > > > scientific approach to it: > > > > > > > > > > > > I am sure you are familiar at least on the basic level with> > > Einstein's> > > > > > relativity and the other theory called Quantum Mechanics.> > During the> > > > > > creation of the universe at the point of big bang it is widely> > > > > > believed that there were four fundamental forces in the> universe:> > > > > > Gravity, electromagnetic, weak nuclear and strong nuclear.It is> > > also> > > > > > now very well accepted that relativity explains Gravity very> > > elegantly> > > > > > and that the theory has been tested to the point ofcalculations> > > > > > pertaning to perhilion of mercury (closest

pass to thesun) with> > > > > > accuracy. On the other hand Quantum mechanics has done well in> > > > > > unifying the other three forces of the electromagnetic and> nuclear> > > > > > nature. BUT a BIG TWIST comes into the picture. > > > > > > > > > > > > Realivity claims that events (spacetime continum is 4D)are all> > > > > > associated together and there is no concept of past and> future or> > > > > > present and in simple terms the destiney is alreadywritten and> > > > > > nothing can change it, so given the right set of laws one can> > > predict> > > > > > the course of life and the cosmos (relativistic conditions on> > > > > > cosmology)to a complete accurate picture based on fundametal> field>

> > > > > equations of einstein. Again Einstein spent much of his life> > > finding a> > > > > > Unified theory that would unify electromagnetics with> gravity BUT> > > > > FAILED. > > > > > > > > > > > > On the other hand QUANTUM MECHANICS claims that nothing in> life is> > > > > > predictable infact everything is a probability. And QMexplains> > > atoms> > > > > > etc the world of sub atomic very well (this would include the> > brain)> > > > > > the body etc, after all brain is essential a complex neural> > network> > > > > > working on neurotransmitters signals which are electrical in> > > nature. > > > > > > So it is quite justified that QM is applicable to us as well> > >

since we> > > > > > are made of atoms, eletrons etc. But the problem you run into> > > with QM> > > > > > is that nothing is certain and that everything isdescribed as a> > > > > > probablity wave function of something called thescrhorodingers> > > > > > equation. I would want you to refer to the thought experiment> > termed> > > > > > "Schroender's Cat" which is hard for me to explain on thisfourm> > > but I> > > > > > am sure you will take the initiative of reading it, in short> every> > > > > > observation made my an reference observer will change the> > course of> > > > > > this obervation directly or indirectly depending on the> > observation> > > > > > being made. Simply put, there is too much

random ness existent> > > in this> > > > > > universe to be able to describe anything in any accruancy,> > > especially> > > > > > when it comes to life or the atomic scale. > > > > > > > > > > > > Now applying the above theories to describe astrology, many> of the> > > > > > General predictions we make about the past or even thefuture at> > > times> > > > > > happen to come true, yet there are many more predictionswe made> > > that> > > > > > do not come true at all. Because we are juggling between> > certainity> > > > > > and chaos and that is not the fault or positive aspect ofanyone> > > > > > astrological system but rather the law of nature (God ifyou may> > > call> >

> > > > it). You have claimed in your past emails that KAS is very> > accurate> > > > > > however on my sincere application of these principles I have> > > found it> > > > > > smiliar to any other system because the rate of predicition> > does not> > > > > > change much as compared to prashara or k.p or jaimini for that> > > > matter. > > > > > > > > > > > > It is however a different story if we only look at thepositive> > > aspect> > > > > > and not realise the shortcomings of any system. My approach is> > > to look> > > > > > at the short comings of this system simply because itmight help> > > > > > improve the system in some other way (again thats not job). My> > sole> > > >

> > intention for this posting has been to again reiterate on a> > > scientific> > > > > > ground the limitations of astrology and that of human mind and> > > that no> > > > > > matter how hard we try we will be bound by manycontraints. You> > > might> > > > > > claim that KAS predictions have come true, but I have applied> > basic> > > > > > principles of many charts some of which have yieldedresults but> > > again> > > > > > some of them have not yielded the correct results (this I see> > > with an> > > > > > open mind) leading me to believe and again affirm with the> > view that> > > > > > astrology has limitations on what can be predicted. Any when> > we are> > > > > > bound by such

limitations then ethically we should take a more> > > > > > cautious approach in predicting in the first place andperhaps a> > > more> > > > > > understanding, less materialistic (making money out of> astrology)> > > > > > attitude in researching things. This would also involve being> > > open to> > > > > > genuine thoughts weather pro or against any system in the> > betterment> > > > > > of knowledge. > > > > > > > > > > > > To end it Einstein once said "God does not play dice with the> > > > > > Universe" on seeing Quatum Mechanics back in the 30s he was> > > > > > diasspointed with QM because he felt there was no free will> > and that> > > > > > there was no such thing as probablity. A famous

Quautum> > Theorist (I> > > > > > will let you figure out who) responded by saying "Not only> > does God> > > > > > play dice with Us, He also puts it in places where we cannot> find> > > > it". > > > > > > > > > > > > :) I hope you see this message not as a threat to your> system but> > > > > > rather as an open ended question to ponder on keeping aside> > > > > > ego,predjuice or any other negative emotions. > > > > > > > > > > > > regards and Best> > > > > > Amit> > > > > >> > > > >> > > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Be a

better Heartthrob. Get better relationship answers from someone> who knows.> > Answers - Check it out.> >> Be a better Heartthrob. Get better relationship answers from someone who knows. Answers - Check it out. Fussy? Opinionated? Impossible to please? Perfect. Join 's user panel and lay it on us. 5, 50, 500, 5000

- Store N number of mails in your inbox.

Tonight's top picks. What will you watch tonight? Preview the hottest shows on TV.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dear Anup and Harjeet,

I had a brief chat with Krushnaji, and I asked him about this

particular scenario about 0’s in navamsa if there are 3 zeroes. So

Krushnaji told me that that might delay marriage and reduce the happiness of

marriage. However for denial we must check Rasi.

So I guess, the laws that are given in the Rasi are for denial of

marriage as per lessons about 3 zeroes and moon in Krishna

pax etc.

I also asked how much delay so Krushanji told me that delay might

be of even 30 years if there are no blessings.

Good question Harjeet, and thanks for bringing that up. If we get

a chart like that we can study this phenomenon.

 

 

Cheers !!!

Ash -> http://www.ashtro.ca

 

 

 

 

 

On Behalf Of harjeet bakshi

Thursday September 13, 2007

1:35 PM

 

Subject:

Re: Dear Ash et All :On the Creation of Universe and

Cosmology as applicable to

 

 

 

 

 

Dear A & A,

so do we take it as denial ?

thanks/regards

harjeet

 

,

" Anup. M "

<dalh_1 wrote:

>

> Dear Ash nd Harjeet,

>

> Thanks Ash...i cld understand as you are teaching us step by step.

> Besides that Harjeet is my classmate and naughty, so wanted to

> divert his attention by some way:)

>

> Btw, here is one of the illustration by you in some archive...

>

> " YOGAS, OR SAY SARVASHTAKAVARGA IS CASTED IN ALL D CHARTS SO IT

> MEANS THAT PLANETS RELATION W.R.T EACH OTHER OR YOGAS ARE CONSIDERED

> AND THAT POWER I.E. WHEN WE FIND THE BASIC STRENGTH THEN THAT GIVES

> THE POWER OF 7 PLANETS IN 12 HOUSES IN NAVAMSA ONLY, SO HERE IT

> NAVAMSA IS A D-CHART AND LIKE ALL D-CHART WHEN FINDING POWER U ONLY

> CHECK THE BASIC STRENGTH AND NO ASPECTS OR 4:10 ARE CONSIDERED FOR

> D-CHART AND NAVAMSA AS WELL WHICH IS ALSO A D-CHART "

>

> Regards

> Anup

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

> Ash <kas wrote:

> Dear Anup,

>

> What is the meaning of finding the basic strength in D-Chart.

Just think over it.

> We are adding A+B+C points.

> So if there are 0's in a D chart then they automatically get

reflected in the Basic Strength in the D-Chart WS.

>

> Cheers !!!

> Ash -> http://www.ashtro.ca

>

>

>

>

>

 

On Behalf Of Anup. M

> Thursday September 13, 2007 12:56 PM

>

> Re: Re: Dear Ash et All :On the

Creation of Universe and Cosmology as applicable to

>

>

> Dear Harjeet ,

>

>

>

> " us shehar mein jao,to itna use kehna,

> baqi na sune koi, sirf tanha usay kehna,

> kuch log safar kay liye mozo'n (suitable) nahi hotay,

> kuch raaste kate nahi tanha,itna use kehna "

>

>

>

> Now tell me,how the quality of a marriage will be, if there is

no zero in SAV by any planet

>

> and three zero in navamsa :) and What about such case...denial

or delay of marriage??

>

>

>

> Regards

>

> Anup

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

> harjeet bakshi <harjeet_bakshi wrote:

>

> Dear Ashji,

> whenever one of my teacher used to give me smile.. i used to do

> something wrong in solving a problem... but she would not tell me till

> i asked her.

> so did i do something wrong?

> thanks/regards

> harjeet

>

> ,

" ashsam73 " <kas@>

> wrote:

> >

> > Dear Harjeet,

> >

> > :-)

> >

> > Cheers !!!

> > Ash -> http://www.ashtro.ca

> >

> > ,

" Ash " <kas@> wrote:

> > >

> > > Dear Harjeet,

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > > :-)

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > > Cheers !!!

> > >

> > > Ash -> <http://www.ashtro.ca>

http://www.ashtro.ca

> > >

> > > _____

> > >

> > >

> > >

On Behalf Of

harjeet

> > > bakshi

> > > Thursday September 13, 2007 11:19 AM

> > >

> > > Re: Dear Ash et All :On

the

> > Creation of

> > > Universe and Cosmology as applicable to

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > > Resp. Ashji,

> > > more over current antra of rahu samdhari to venus and mars.

> > > mars have more points for 12th compared to 11th.

> > > venus has 20 for 11th and 17 for 12th.

> > > rahu in 9th house triggers 12th and 4th house.

> > > so mars points in ws and rahu's position points to more

expenditure in

> > > current antra.

> > > moreover antras of mars,saturn,moon,mercury and sun have

less points

> > > in worsheet for 11th house compared to 12th.

> > > only jupiter and venus have a just little more points in 11th

compared

> > > to 12th.

> > > plus the sav in 12th is more than 11th.

> > > dont we take mean of sav from sun,moon and lagna ?

> > > anything wrong in my thinking?

> > > thanks/regards

> > > harjeet

> > >

> > > astrologyandtiminge

> > > <%40>

> > vents ,

> > > " Ash " <kas@> wrote:

> > > >

> > > > Dear Amit,

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > With this data u have given,

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > 19th May 1986

> > > >

> > > > 12:10 PM

> > > >

> > > > New Delhi

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > Planet

> > > >

> > > > Degrees

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > As

> > > >

> > > > 5 Le 38

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > Su

> > > >

> > > > 5 Ta 14

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > Mo

> > > >

> > > > 2 Vi 38

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > Ma

> > > >

> > > > 27 Sg 51

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > Me

> > > >

> > > > 0 Ta 39

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > Ju

> > > >

> > > > 25 Aq 40

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > Ve

> > > >

> > > > 4 Ge 28

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > SaR

> > > >

> > > > 14 Sc 17

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > Ra

> > > >

> > > > 5 Ar 44

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > Ke

> > > >

> > > > 5 Li 44

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > House

> > > >

> > > > 1

> > > >

> > > > 2

> > > >

> > > > 3

> > > >

> > > > 4

> > > >

> > > > 5

> > > >

> > > > 6

> > > >

> > > > 7

> > > >

> > > > 8

> > > >

> > > > 9

> > > >

> > > > 10

> > > >

> > > > 11

> > > >

> > > > 12

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > Sun

> > > >

> > >

> >

>

<file:///C:\Documents%20and%20Settings\ENagawkar\Desktop\KASMaster.xls#BAV!T

> > > > 7#BAV!T7>

> > > >

> > > > 10

> > > >

> > > > 3

> > > >

> > > > 3

> > > >

> > > > 4

> > > >

> > > > 5

> > > >

> > > > 5

> > > >

> > > > 4

> > > >

> > > > 4

> > > >

> > > > 3

> > > >

> > > > 1

> > > >

> > > > 4

> > > >

> > > > 6

> > > >

> > > > 6

> > > >

> > > > 48

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > Moon

> > > >

> > >

> >

>

<file:///C:\Documents%20and%20Settings\ENagawkar\Desktop\KASMaster.xls#BAV!A

> > > > J7#BAV!AJ7>

> > > >

> > > > 2

> > > >

> > > > 4

> > > >

> > > > 6

> > > >

> > > > 4

> > > >

> > > > 4

> > > >

> > > > 4

> > > >

> > > > 4

> > > >

> > > > 6

> > > >

> > > > 5

> > > >

> > > > 3

> > > >

> > > > 4

> > > >

> > > > 2

> > > >

> > > > 3

> > > >

> > > > 49

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > Mars

> > > >

> > >

> >

>

<file:///C:\Documents%20and%20Settings\ENagawkar\Desktop\KASMaster.xls#BAV!D

> > > > 34#BAV!D34>

> > > >

> > > > 5

> > > >

> > > > 2

> > > >

> > > > 4

> > > >

> > > > 4

> > > >

> > > > 4

> > > >

> > > > 2

> > > >

> > > > 4

> > > >

> > > > 3

> > > >

> > > > 3

> > > >

> > > > 1

> > > >

> > > > 3

> > > >

> > > > 3

> > > >

> > > > 6

> > > >

> > > > 39

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > Mercury

> > > >

> > >

> >

>

<file:///C:\Documents%20and%20Settings\ENagawkar\Desktop\KASMaster.xls#BAV!T

> > > > 34#BAV!T34>

> > > >

> > > > 10

> > > >

> > > > 4

> > > >

> > > > 7

> > > >

> > > > 5

> > > >

> > > > 2

> > > >

> > > > 4

> > > >

> > > > 6

> > > >

> > > > 4

> > > >

> > > > 4

> > > >

> > > > 4

> > > >

> > > > 3

> > > >

> > > > 5

> > > >

> > > > 6

> > > >

> > > > 54

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > Jupiter

> > > >

> > >

> >

>

<file:///C:\Documents%20and%20Settings\ENagawkar\Desktop\KASMaster.xls#BAV!A

> > > > J34#BAV!AJ34>

> > > >

> > > > 7

> > > >

> > > > 4

> > > >

> > > > 4

> > > >

> > > > 5

> > > >

> > > > 4

> > > >

> > > > 4

> > > >

> > > > 6

> > > >

> > > > 5

> > > >

> > > > 7

> > > >

> > > > 4

> > > >

> > > > 5

> > > >

> > > > 4

> > > >

> > > > 4

> > > >

> > > > 56

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > Venus

> > > >

> > >

> >

>

<file:///C:\Documents%20and%20Settings\ENagawkar\Desktop\KASMaster.xls#BAV!G

> > > > 61#BAV!G61>

> > > >

> > > > 11

> > > >

> > > > 5

> > > >

> > > > 6

> > > >

> > > > 6

> > > >

> > > > 4

> > > >

> > > > 4

> > > >

> > > > 4

> > > >

> > > > 3

> > > >

> > > > 5

> > > >

> > > > 5

> > > >

> > > > 2

> > > >

> > > > 4

> > > >

> > > > 4

> > > >

> > > > 52

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > Saturn

> > > >

> > >

> >

>

<file:///C:\Documents%20and%20Settings\ENagawkar\Desktop\KASMaster.xls#BAV!T

> > > > 61#BAV!T61>

> > > >

> > > > 4

> > > >

> > > > 2

> > > >

> > > > 2

> > > >

> > > > 3

> > > >

> > > > 5

> > > >

> > > > 3

> > > >

> > > > 4

> > > >

> > > > 4

> > > >

> > > > 3

> > > >

> > > > 4

> > > >

> > > > 4

> > > >

> > > > 3

> > > >

> > > > 2

> > > >

> > > > 39

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > Totals

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > 24

> > > >

> > > > 32

> > > >

> > > > 31

> > > >

> > > > 28

> > > >

> > > > 26

> > > >

> > > > 32

> > > >

> > > > 29

> > > >

> > > > 30

> > > >

> > > > 22

> > > >

> > > > 25

> > > >

> > > > 27

> > > >

> > > > 31

> > > >

> > > > 337

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > The points in 12th are more than 11th.

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > In any case, let it be.

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > Cheers !!!

> > > >

> > > > Ash -> <http://www.ashtro.

<http://www.ashtro.ca> ca>

> > http://www.ashtro.

> > > <http://www.ashtro.ca>

ca

> > > >

> > > > _____

> > > >

> > > > astrologyandtiminge

> > > <%40>

> > vents

> > > > [astrologyandtiminge

> > > <%40>

> > vents ]

> > > On Behalf Of planck12

> > > > Wednesday September 12, 2007 7:58 PM

> > > > astrologyandtiminge

> > > <%40>

> > vents

> > > > Re: Dear Ash et

All :On the

> > > Creation of

> > > > Universe and Cosmology as applicable to

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > Dear Ash,

> > > > Yes, I completely concur and thats all I wanted to clarify

from my

> > > > end. Again before I leave I have another chart if anyone

wants

> to use

> > > > from educational stand point.

> > > >

> > > > 19 May 1986

> > > > 12:10pm

> > > > new delhi.

 

> > > >

> > > > Again i decided to relate the 11/12th house points, in this

chart

> > > > again the worksheet decided to give more points in 11th

house than

> > > > 12th. But the girl has no savings, he is quite spendrift

and have

> > > > numerous expenses as compared to her income.

> > > >

> > > > Also to double check other things, i decided to check other

factors,

> > > > her brillancy for that matter. I think she has two parts in

saturn

> > > > degrees as shown with the work sheet. But she is not very

> intelligent,

> > > > again a decent girl who is quite jovial, but she has done a

> > > > certificate course and works in a local bank. As I

understand it

> from

> > > > the notes if one part is in saturn then person has odinary

> > > > intelligence and if two he/she has good intelligence. In

her

> case she

> > > > is normal like anyone else who has no part in saturns

division.

> > > >

> > > > Feel free to check, incase there are other things required,

as is

> > > > always the case in terms of details.

> > > >

> > > > 1. The girl is unmarried

> > > > 2. Wheatish complexion

> > > > 3. works in a bank as teller

> > > > 4. From a middle class family

> > > > 5. Has good morals, but tends to be energetic and hyper at

times

> > > >

> > > > regards

> > > > Nicked Vish (Amit) I prefer Vish

> > > >

> > > > astrologyandtiminge

> > > > <%40>

> > > vents (AT) (DOT) <vents%40>

com,

> > > > " Ash " <kas@> wrote:

> > > > >

> > > > > Dear Amit / Vishy (?),

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > > Everyone is entitled to their own opinion and All the

more

> reason we

> > > > should

> > > > > get back to KAS :-)

> > > > >

> > > > > Cheers !!!

> > > > >

> > > > > Ash -> <http://www.ashtro.

<http://www.ashtro.

> > <http://www.ashtro.ca>

> > > ca> ca>

> > > http://www.ashtro.

> > > > <http://www.ashtro.

<http://www.ashtro.ca> ca> ca

> > > > >

> > > > > _____

> > > > >

> > > > > astrologyandtiminge

> > > > <%40>

> > > vents (AT) (DOT) <vents%40>

com

> > > > > [astrologyandtiminge

> > > > <%40>

> > > vents (AT) (DOT) <vents%40>

com]

> > > > On Behalf Of

> > > > astroquery12

> > > > > Wednesday September 12, 2007 7:11 PM

> > > > > astrologyandtiminge

> > > > <%40>

> > > vents (AT) (DOT) <vents%40>

com

> > > > > Dear Ash et All

:On the

> > > Creation of

> > > > > Universe and Cosmology as applicable to Astr

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > > Hi,

> > > > > Hope you are doing well. This is Amit again, had

posted under a

> > > > > different name prior but that account did not seem to

work and

> > had to

> > > > > create a new id.

> > > > >

> > > > > I have been following the lessons for a while and

again I

see many

> > > > > in-consistencies with the system. My intention is not

to

refute or

> > > > > accept the system but purely to learn it and see it

> practicality and

> > > > > in the process provide my thoughts in opinions (after

all the

> > > > > astrology forum is a free form for discussion). Some

of my

> > doubts have

> > > > > cropped up again with the usual, 11th house points vs

12th house

> > > > > points and the actual condition of the charts (again

this is

only

> > > > > treating the chart with KAS)as opposed to mixing

parashra or k.p

> > etc.

> > > > >

> > > > > On another note, perhaps I can take the liberty to

explain

> again on

> > > > > why this happens and hopefully you concur with my

points and

> facts.

> > > > > After all astrology will make more meaning if we

understand it

> from

> > > > > all angles. You are a computer scientist (a man of

science)

> yourself

> > > > > and perhaps this description will make sense and will

take a

> purely

> > > > > scientific approach to it:

> > > > >

> > > > > I am sure you are familiar at least on the basic level

with

> > Einstein's

> > > > > relativity and the other theory called Quantum

Mechanics.

> During the

> > > > > creation of the universe at the point of big bang it

is widely

> > > > > believed that there were four fundamental forces in

the

universe:

> > > > > Gravity, electromagnetic, weak nuclear and strong

nuclear. It is

> > also

> > > > > now very well accepted that relativity explains

Gravity very

> > elegantly

> > > > > and that the theory has been tested to the point of

calculations

> > > > > pertaning to perhilion of mercury (closest pass to the

sun) with

> > > > > accuracy. On the other hand Quantum mechanics has done

well in

> > > > > unifying the other three forces of the electromagnetic

and

nuclear

> > > > > nature. BUT a BIG TWIST comes into the picture.

> > > > >

> > > > > Realivity claims that events (spacetime continum is

4D) are all

> > > > > associated together and there is no concept of past

and

future or

> > > > > present and in simple terms the destiney is already

written and

> > > > > nothing can change it, so given the right set of laws one

can

> > predict

> > > > > the course of life and the cosmos (relativistic

conditions on

> > > > > cosmology)to a complete accurate picture based on

fundametal

field

> > > > > equations of einstein. Again Einstein spent much of

his life

> > finding a

> > > > > Unified theory that would unify electromagnetics with

gravity BUT

> > > > FAILED.

> > > > >

> > > > > On the other hand QUANTUM MECHANICS claims that

nothing in

life is

> > > > > predictable infact everything is a probability. And QM

explains

> > atoms

> > > > > etc the world of sub atomic very well (this would

include the

> brain)

> > > > > the body etc, after all brain is essential a complex

neural

> network

> > > > > working on neurotransmitters signals which are

electrical in

> > nature.

> > > > > So it is quite justified that QM is applicable to us

as well

> > since we

> > > > > are made of atoms, eletrons etc. But the problem you

run into

> > with QM

> > > > > is that nothing is certain and that everything is

described as a

> > > > > probablity wave function of something called the

scrhorodingers

> > > > > equation. I would want you to refer to the thought

experiment

> termed

> > > > > " Schroender's Cat " which is hard for me

to explain on this fourm

> > but I

> > > > > am sure you will take the initiative of reading it, in

short

every

> > > > > observation made my an reference observer will change

the

> course of

> > > > > this obervation directly or indirectly depending on

the

> observation

> > > > > being made. Simply put, there is too much random ness

existent

> > in this

> > > > > universe to be able to describe anything in any

accruancy,

> > especially

> > > > > when it comes to life or the atomic scale.

> > > > >

> > > > > Now applying the above theories to describe astrology,

many

of the

> > > > > General predictions we make about the past or even the

future at

> > times

> > > > > happen to come true, yet there are many more

predictions we made

> > that

> > > > > do not come true at all. Because we are juggling

between

> certainity

> > > > > and chaos and that is not the fault or positive aspect

of anyone

> > > > > astrological system but rather the law of nature (God

if you may

> > call

> > > > > it). You have claimed in your past emails that KAS is

very

> accurate

> > > > > however on my sincere application of these principles

I have

> > found it

> > > > > smiliar to any other system because the rate of

predicition

> does not

> > > > > change much as compared to prashara or k.p or jaimini

for that

> > > matter.

> > > > >

> > > > > It is however a different story if we only look at the

positive

> > aspect

> > > > > and not realise the shortcomings of any system. My

approach is

> > to look

> > > > > at the short comings of this system simply because it

might help

> > > > > improve the system in some other way (again thats not

job). My

> sole

> > > > > intention for this posting has been to again reiterate

on a

> > scientific

> > > > > ground the limitations of astrology and that of human

mind and

> > that no

> > > > > matter how hard we try we will be bound by many

contraints. You

> > might

> > > > > claim that KAS predictions have come true, but I have

applied

> basic

> > > > > principles of many charts some of which have yielded

results but

> > again

> > > > > some of them have not yielded the correct results

(this I see

> > with an

> > > > > open mind) leading me to believe and again affirm with

the

> view that

> > > > > astrology has limitations on what can be predicted.

Any when

> we are

> > > > > bound by such limitations then ethically we should

take a more

> > > > > cautious approach in predicting in the first place and

perhaps a

> > more

> > > > > understanding, less materialistic (making money out of

astrology)

> > > > > attitude in researching things. This would also

involve being

> > open to

> > > > > genuine thoughts weather pro or against any system in

the

> betterment

> > > > > of knowledge.

> > > > >

> > > > > To end it Einstein once said " God does not play

dice with the

> > > > > Universe " on seeing Quatum Mechanics back in the

30s he was

> > > > > diasspointed with QM because he felt there was no free

will

> and that

> > > > > there was no such thing as probablity. A famous

Quautum

> Theorist (I

> > > > > will let you figure out who) responded by saying

" Not only

> does God

> > > > > play dice with Us, He also puts it in places where we

cannot

find

> > > it " .

> > > > >

> > > > > :) I hope you see this message not as a threat to your

system but

> > > > > rather as an open ended question to ponder on keeping

aside

> > > > > ego,predjuice or any other negative emotions.

> > > > >

> > > > > regards and Best

> > > > > Amit

> > > > >

> > > >

> > >

> >

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

> Be a better Heartthrob. Get better relationship answers from

someone who knows.

> Answers - Check it out.

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

> Got a little couch potato?

> Check out fun summer activities for kids.

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dear Ashji,

thanks again.

another question :

for a chart where there is only jupiter delay. so it would be 24

years. till jupiter completed 2 cycles. if jupiter in this chart

happens to be lord of B or E or D. does this delay gets reduced or if

jupiter very strong for 5th,7th and 12th house and its antra comes

before delay period.. would it give result ?

thanks/regards

harjeet

 

, " Ash " <kas wrote:

>

> Dear Harjeet,

>

> Yes that is correct. Refer to my earlier post on this w.r.t delay and

> denial.

>

>

>

> Cheers !!!

>

> Ash -> <http://www.ashtro.ca> http://www.ashtro.ca

>

> _____

>

>

> On Behalf Of harjeet

> bakshi

> Thursday September 13, 2007 1:36 PM

>

> Re: Dear Ash et All :On the

Creation of

> Universe and Cosmology as applicable to

>

>

>

> Dear Ashji,

> so the quality suffers but denial cant be said ...

> thanks/regards

> harjeet

>

> astrologyandtiminge

> <%40>

vents ,

> " Ash " <kas@> wrote:

> >

> > Dear Hajreet,

> >

> > The delay calculations are as per the technique taught, i.e. say if

> Sa is in

> > 5th house in Navamsa so marriage can get delayed etc etc.

> >

> > 0's in Rasi chart are used to find delay, but 0 in d-chart has not

been

> > specified by Krushnaji.

> >

> > 0's in D chart get covered in the basic strength calculation.

> >

> >

> >

> > Cheers !!!

> >

> > Ash -> <http://www.ashtro. <http://www.ashtro.ca> ca>

http://www.ashtro.

> <http://www.ashtro.ca> ca

> >

> > _____

> >

> > astrologyandtiminge

> <%40>

vents

> > [astrologyandtiminge

> <%40>

vents ]

> On Behalf Of harjeet

> > bakshi

> > Thursday September 13, 2007 1:16 PM

> > astrologyandtiminge

> <%40>

vents

> > Re: Dear Ash et All :On the

> Creation of

> > Universe and Cosmology as applicable to

> >

> >

> >

> > Dear Anup,

> > wah wah!!

> > can you please give the birth data so other factors can be seen.

> > as per your question if i had to answer without considering other

> > factors... i am optimistic.. i would say delayed marriage :).

> > remember Krushnaji said.. 50% of effect by planet rest by efforts of

> > person. and if there are blessing in chart or from up above..

> > thanks/regards

> > harjeet

> >

> > astrologyandtiminge

> > <%40>

> vents (AT) (DOT) <vents%40> com,

> > " Anup. M "

> > <dalh_1@> wrote:

> > >

> > > Dear Harjeet ,

> > >

> > > " us shehar mein jao,to itna use kehna,

> > > baqi na sune koi, sirf tanha usay kehna,

> > > kuch log safar kay liye mozo'n (suitable) nahi hotay,

> > > kuch raaste kate nahi tanha,itna use kehna "

> > >

> > > Now tell me,how the quality of a marriage will be, if there is no

> > zero in SAV by any planet

> > > and three zero in navamsa :) and What about such case...denial or

> > delay of marriage??

> > >

> > > Regards

> > > Anup

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > > harjeet bakshi <harjeet_bakshi@> wrote:

> > > Dear Ashji,

> > > whenever one of my teacher used to give me smile.. i used to do

> > > something wrong in solving a problem... but she would not tell

me till

> > > i asked her.

> > > so did i do something wrong?

> > > thanks/regards

> > > harjeet

> > >

> > > astrologyandtiminge

> > <%40>

> vents (AT) (DOT) <vents%40> com,

> > " ashsam73 " <kas@>

> > > wrote:

> > > >

> > > > Dear Harjeet,

> > > >

> > > > :-)

> > > >

> > > > Cheers !!!

> > > > Ash -> http://www.ashtro. <http://www.ashtro.

<http://www.ashtro.ca>

> ca> ca

> > > >

> > > > astrologyandtiminge

> > <%40>

> vents (AT) (DOT) <vents%40> com,

> > " Ash " <kas@> wrote:

> > > > >

> > > > > Dear Harjeet,

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > > :-)

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > > Cheers !!!

> > > > >

> > > > > Ash -> <http://www.ashtro. <http://www.ashtro.

> <http://www.ashtro.ca> ca> ca>

> > http://www.ashtro. <http://www.ashtro. <http://www.ashtro.ca> ca> ca

> > > > >

> > > > > _____

> > > > >

> > > > > astrologyandtiminge

> > <%40>

> vents (AT) (DOT) <vents%40> com

> > > > > [astrologyandtiminge

> > <%40>

> vents (AT) (DOT) <vents%40> com]

> > On Behalf Of

> > harjeet

> > > > > bakshi

> > > > > Thursday September 13, 2007 11:19 AM

> > > > > astrologyandtiminge

> > <%40>

> vents (AT) (DOT) <vents%40> com

> > > > > Re: Dear Ash et All :On the

> > > > Creation of

> > > > > Universe and Cosmology as applicable to

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > > Resp. Ashji,

> > > > > more over current antra of rahu samdhari to venus and mars.

> > > > > mars have more points for 12th compared to 11th.

> > > > > venus has 20 for 11th and 17 for 12th.

> > > > > rahu in 9th house triggers 12th and 4th house.

> > > > > so mars points in ws and rahu's position points to more

> > expenditure in

> > > > > current antra.

> > > > > moreover antras of mars,saturn,moon,mercury and sun have less

> points

> > > > > in worsheet for 11th house compared to 12th.

> > > > > only jupiter and venus have a just little more points in 11th

> > compared

> > > > > to 12th.

> > > > > plus the sav in 12th is more than 11th.

> > > > > dont we take mean of sav from sun,moon and lagna ?

> > > > > anything wrong in my thinking?

> > > > > thanks/regards

> > > > > harjeet

> > > > >

> > > > > astrologyandtiminge

> > > > > <%40>

> > > > vents (AT) (DOT) <vents%40> com,

> > > > > " Ash " <kas@> wrote:

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Dear Amit,

> > > > > >

> > > > > >

> > > > > >

> > > > > > With this data u have given,

> > > > > >

> > > > > >

> > > > > >

> > > > > > 19th May 1986

> > > > > >

> > > > > > 12:10 PM

> > > > > >

> > > > > > New Delhi

> > > > > >

> > > > > >

> > > > > >

> > > > > >

> > > > > >

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Planet

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Degrees

> > > > > >

> > > > > >

> > > > > > As

> > > > > >

> > > > > > 5 Le 38

> > > > > >

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Su

> > > > > >

> > > > > > 5 Ta 14

> > > > > >

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Mo

> > > > > >

> > > > > > 2 Vi 38

> > > > > >

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Ma

> > > > > >

> > > > > > 27 Sg 51

> > > > > >

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Me

> > > > > >

> > > > > > 0 Ta 39

> > > > > >

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Ju

> > > > > >

> > > > > > 25 Aq 40

> > > > > >

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Ve

> > > > > >

> > > > > > 4 Ge 28

> > > > > >

> > > > > >

> > > > > > SaR

> > > > > >

> > > > > > 14 Sc 17

> > > > > >

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Ra

> > > > > >

> > > > > > 5 Ar 44

> > > > > >

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Ke

> > > > > >

> > > > > > 5 Li 44

> > > > > >

> > > > > >

> > > > > >

> > > > > >

> > > > > >

> > > > > >

> > > > > >

> > > > > >

> > > > > > House

> > > > > >

> > > > > > 1

> > > > > >

> > > > > > 2

> > > > > >

> > > > > > 3

> > > > > >

> > > > > > 4

> > > > > >

> > > > > > 5

> > > > > >

> > > > > > 6

> > > > > >

> > > > > > 7

> > > > > >

> > > > > > 8

> > > > > >

> > > > > > 9

> > > > > >

> > > > > > 10

> > > > > >

> > > > > > 11

> > > > > >

> > > > > > 12

> > > > > >

> > > > > >

> > > > > >

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Sun

> > > > > >

> > > > >

> > > >

> > >

> >

>

<file:///C:\Documents%20and%20Settings\ENagawkar\Desktop\KASMaster.xls#BAV!T

> > > > > > 7#BAV!T7>

> > > > > >

> > > > > > 10

> > > > > >

> > > > > > 3

> > > > > >

> > > > > > 3

> > > > > >

> > > > > > 4

> > > > > >

> > > > > > 5

> > > > > >

> > > > > > 5

> > > > > >

> > > > > > 4

> > > > > >

> > > > > > 4

> > > > > >

> > > > > > 3

> > > > > >

> > > > > > 1

> > > > > >

> > > > > > 4

> > > > > >

> > > > > > 6

> > > > > >

> > > > > > 6

> > > > > >

> > > > > > 48

> > > > > >

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Moon

> > > > > >

> > > > >

> > > >

> > >

> >

>

<file:///C:\Documents%20and%20Settings\ENagawkar\Desktop\KASMaster.xls#BAV!A

> > > > > > J7#BAV!AJ7>

> > > > > >

> > > > > > 2

> > > > > >

> > > > > > 4

> > > > > >

> > > > > > 6

> > > > > >

> > > > > > 4

> > > > > >

> > > > > > 4

> > > > > >

> > > > > > 4

> > > > > >

> > > > > > 4

> > > > > >

> > > > > > 6

> > > > > >

> > > > > > 5

> > > > > >

> > > > > > 3

> > > > > >

> > > > > > 4

> > > > > >

> > > > > > 2

> > > > > >

> > > > > > 3

> > > > > >

> > > > > > 49

> > > > > >

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Mars

> > > > > >

> > > > >

> > > >

> > >

> >

>

<file:///C:\Documents%20and%20Settings\ENagawkar\Desktop\KASMaster.xls#BAV!D

> > > > > > 34#BAV!D34>

> > > > > >

> > > > > > 5

> > > > > >

> > > > > > 2

> > > > > >

> > > > > > 4

> > > > > >

> > > > > > 4

> > > > > >

> > > > > > 4

> > > > > >

> > > > > > 2

> > > > > >

> > > > > > 4

> > > > > >

> > > > > > 3

> > > > > >

> > > > > > 3

> > > > > >

> > > > > > 1

> > > > > >

> > > > > > 3

> > > > > >

> > > > > > 3

> > > > > >

> > > > > > 6

> > > > > >

> > > > > > 39

> > > > > >

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Mercury

> > > > > >

> > > > >

> > > >

> > >

> >

>

<file:///C:\Documents%20and%20Settings\ENagawkar\Desktop\KASMaster.xls#BAV!T

> > > > > > 34#BAV!T34>

> > > > > >

> > > > > > 10

> > > > > >

> > > > > > 4

> > > > > >

> > > > > > 7

> > > > > >

> > > > > > 5

> > > > > >

> > > > > > 2

> > > > > >

> > > > > > 4

> > > > > >

> > > > > > 6

> > > > > >

> > > > > > 4

> > > > > >

> > > > > > 4

> > > > > >

> > > > > > 4

> > > > > >

> > > > > > 3

> > > > > >

> > > > > > 5

> > > > > >

> > > > > > 6

> > > > > >

> > > > > > 54

> > > > > >

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Jupiter

> > > > > >

> > > > >

> > > >

> > >

> >

>

<file:///C:\Documents%20and%20Settings\ENagawkar\Desktop\KASMaster.xls#BAV!A

> > > > > > J34#BAV!AJ34>

> > > > > >

> > > > > > 7

> > > > > >

> > > > > > 4

> > > > > >

> > > > > > 4

> > > > > >

> > > > > > 5

> > > > > >

> > > > > > 4

> > > > > >

> > > > > > 4

> > > > > >

> > > > > > 6

> > > > > >

> > > > > > 5

> > > > > >

> > > > > > 7

> > > > > >

> > > > > > 4

> > > > > >

> > > > > > 5

> > > > > >

> > > > > > 4

> > > > > >

> > > > > > 4

> > > > > >

> > > > > > 56

> > > > > >

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Venus

> > > > > >

> > > > >

> > > >

> > >

> >

>

<file:///C:\Documents%20and%20Settings\ENagawkar\Desktop\KASMaster.xls#BAV!G

> > > > > > 61#BAV!G61>

> > > > > >

> > > > > > 11

> > > > > >

> > > > > > 5

> > > > > >

> > > > > > 6

> > > > > >

> > > > > > 6

> > > > > >

> > > > > > 4

> > > > > >

> > > > > > 4

> > > > > >

> > > > > > 4

> > > > > >

> > > > > > 3

> > > > > >

> > > > > > 5

> > > > > >

> > > > > > 5

> > > > > >

> > > > > > 2

> > > > > >

> > > > > > 4

> > > > > >

> > > > > > 4

> > > > > >

> > > > > > 52

> > > > > >

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Saturn

> > > > > >

> > > > >

> > > >

> > >

> >

>

<file:///C:\Documents%20and%20Settings\ENagawkar\Desktop\KASMaster.xls#BAV!T

> > > > > > 61#BAV!T61>

> > > > > >

> > > > > > 4

> > > > > >

> > > > > > 2

> > > > > >

> > > > > > 2

> > > > > >

> > > > > > 3

> > > > > >

> > > > > > 5

> > > > > >

> > > > > > 3

> > > > > >

> > > > > > 4

> > > > > >

> > > > > > 4

> > > > > >

> > > > > > 3

> > > > > >

> > > > > > 4

> > > > > >

> > > > > > 4

> > > > > >

> > > > > > 3

> > > > > >

> > > > > > 2

> > > > > >

> > > > > > 39

> > > > > >

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Totals

> > > > > >

> > > > > >

> > > > > >

> > > > > > 24

> > > > > >

> > > > > > 32

> > > > > >

> > > > > > 31

> > > > > >

> > > > > > 28

> > > > > >

> > > > > > 26

> > > > > >

> > > > > > 32

> > > > > >

> > > > > > 29

> > > > > >

> > > > > > 30

> > > > > >

> > > > > > 22

> > > > > >

> > > > > > 25

> > > > > >

> > > > > > 27

> > > > > >

> > > > > > 31

> > > > > >

> > > > > > 337

> > > > > >

> > > > > >

> > > > > >

> > > > > >

> > > > > >

> > > > > > The points in 12th are more than 11th.

> > > > > >

> > > > > >

> > > > > >

> > > > > > In any case, let it be.

> > > > > >

> > > > > >

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Cheers !!!

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Ash -> <http://www.ashtro. <http://www.ashtro.

> > <http://www.ashtro. <http://www.ashtro.ca> ca> ca> ca>

> > > > http://www.ashtro.

> > > > > <http://www.ashtro. <http://www.ashtro.

<http://www.ashtro.ca> ca>

> ca> ca

> > > > > >

> > > > > > _____

> > > > > >

> > > > > > astrologyandtiminge

> > > > > <%40>

> > > > vents (AT) (DOT) <vents%40> com

> > > > > > [astrologyandtiminge

> > > > > <%40>

> > > > vents (AT) (DOT) <vents%40> com]

> > > > > On Behalf Of planck12

> > > > > > Wednesday September 12, 2007 7:58 PM

> > > > > > astrologyandtiminge

> > > > > <%40>

> > > > vents (AT) (DOT) <vents%40> com

> > > > > > Re: Dear Ash et All

:On the

> > > > > Creation of

> > > > > > Universe and Cosmology as applicable to

> > > > > >

> > > > > >

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Dear Ash,

> > > > > > Yes, I completely concur and thats all I wanted to clarify

> from my

> > > > > > end. Again before I leave I have another chart if anyone wants

> > > to use

> > > > > > from educational stand point.

> > > > > >

> > > > > > 19 May 1986

> > > > > > 12:10pm

> > > > > > new delhi.

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Again i decided to relate the 11/12th house points, in this

> chart

> > > > > > again the worksheet decided to give more points in 11th

> house than

> > > > > > 12th. But the girl has no savings, he is quite spendrift and

> have

> > > > > > numerous expenses as compared to her income.

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Also to double check other things, i decided to check other

> > factors,

> > > > > > her brillancy for that matter. I think she has two parts in

> saturn

> > > > > > degrees as shown with the work sheet. But she is not very

> > > intelligent,

> > > > > > again a decent girl who is quite jovial, but she has done a

> > > > > > certificate course and works in a local bank. As I

understand it

> > > from

> > > > > > the notes if one part is in saturn then person has odinary

> > > > > > intelligence and if two he/she has good intelligence. In her

> > > case she

> > > > > > is normal like anyone else who has no part in saturns

division.

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Feel free to check, incase there are other things required,

> as is

> > > > > > always the case in terms of details.

> > > > > >

> > > > > > 1. The girl is unmarried

> > > > > > 2. Wheatish complexion

> > > > > > 3. works in a bank as teller

> > > > > > 4. From a middle class family

> > > > > > 5. Has good morals, but tends to be energetic and hyper at

> times

> > > > > >

> > > > > > regards

> > > > > > Nicked Vish (Amit) I prefer Vish

> > > > > >

> > > > > > astrologyandtiminge

> > > > > > <%40>

> > > > > vents (AT) (DOT) <vents%40> com,

> > > > > > " Ash " <kas@> wrote:

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > Dear Amit / Vishy (?),

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > Everyone is entitled to their own opinion and All the more

> > > reason we

> > > > > > should

> > > > > > > get back to KAS :-)

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > Cheers !!!

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > Ash -> <http://www.ashtro. <http://www.ashtro.

> > > > <http://www.ashtro. <http://www.ashtro. <http://www.ashtro.ca>

ca> ca>

> > > > > ca> ca>

> > > > > http://www.ashtro.

> > > > > > <http://www.ashtro. <http://www.ashtro.

> <http://www.ashtro. <http://www.ashtro.ca> ca> ca>

> > ca> ca

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > _____

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > astrologyandtiminge

> > > > > > <%40>

> > > > > vents (AT) (DOT) <vents%40> com

> > > > > > > [astrologyandtiminge

> > > > > > <%40>

> > > > > vents (AT) (DOT) <vents%40> com]

> > > > > > On Behalf Of

> > > > > > astroquery12

> > > > > > > Wednesday September 12, 2007 7:11 PM

> > > > > > > astrologyandtiminge

> > > > > > <%40>

> > > > > vents (AT) (DOT) <vents%40> com

> > > > > > > Dear Ash et All :On the

> > > > > Creation of

> > > > > > > Universe and Cosmology as applicable to Astr

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > Hi,

> > > > > > > Hope you are doing well. This is Amit again, had posted

> under a

> > > > > > > different name prior but that account did not seem to

work and

> > > > had to

> > > > > > > create a new id.

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > I have been following the lessons for a while and again I

> > see many

> > > > > > > in-consistencies with the system. My intention is not to

> > refute or

> > > > > > > accept the system but purely to learn it and see it

> > > practicality and

> > > > > > > in the process provide my thoughts in opinions (after

all the

> > > > > > > astrology forum is a free form for discussion). Some of my

> > > > doubts have

> > > > > > > cropped up again with the usual, 11th house points vs 12th

> house

> > > > > > > points and the actual condition of the charts (again this is

> > only

> > > > > > > treating the chart with KAS)as opposed to mixing parashra

> or k.p

> > > > etc.

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > On another note, perhaps I can take the liberty to explain

> > > again on

> > > > > > > why this happens and hopefully you concur with my points and

> > > facts.

> > > > > > > After all astrology will make more meaning if we

understand it

> > > from

> > > > > > > all angles. You are a computer scientist (a man of science)

> > > yourself

> > > > > > > and perhaps this description will make sense and will take a

> > > purely

> > > > > > > scientific approach to it:

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > I am sure you are familiar at least on the basic level with

> > > > Einstein's

> > > > > > > relativity and the other theory called Quantum Mechanics.

> > > During the

> > > > > > > creation of the universe at the point of big bang it is

widely

> > > > > > > believed that there were four fundamental forces in the

> > universe:

> > > > > > > Gravity, electromagnetic, weak nuclear and strong nuclear.

> It is

> > > > also

> > > > > > > now very well accepted that relativity explains Gravity very

> > > > elegantly

> > > > > > > and that the theory has been tested to the point of

> calculations

> > > > > > > pertaning to perhilion of mercury (closest pass to the

> sun) with

> > > > > > > accuracy. On the other hand Quantum mechanics has done

well in

> > > > > > > unifying the other three forces of the electromagnetic and

> > nuclear

> > > > > > > nature. BUT a BIG TWIST comes into the picture.

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > Realivity claims that events (spacetime continum is 4D)

> are all

> > > > > > > associated together and there is no concept of past and

> > future or

> > > > > > > present and in simple terms the destiney is already

> written and

> > > > > > > nothing can change it, so given the right set of laws

one can

> > > > predict

> > > > > > > the course of life and the cosmos (relativistic

conditions on

> > > > > > > cosmology)to a complete accurate picture based on fundametal

> > field

> > > > > > > equations of einstein. Again Einstein spent much of his life

> > > > finding a

> > > > > > > Unified theory that would unify electromagnetics with

> > gravity BUT

> > > > > > FAILED.

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > On the other hand QUANTUM MECHANICS claims that nothing in

> > life is

> > > > > > > predictable infact everything is a probability. And QM

> explains

> > > > atoms

> > > > > > > etc the world of sub atomic very well (this would

include the

> > > brain)

> > > > > > > the body etc, after all brain is essential a complex neural

> > > network

> > > > > > > working on neurotransmitters signals which are electrical in

> > > > nature.

> > > > > > > So it is quite justified that QM is applicable to us as well

> > > > since we

> > > > > > > are made of atoms, eletrons etc. But the problem you run

into

> > > > with QM

> > > > > > > is that nothing is certain and that everything is

> described as a

> > > > > > > probablity wave function of something called the

> scrhorodingers

> > > > > > > equation. I would want you to refer to the thought

experiment

> > > termed

> > > > > > > " Schroender's Cat " which is hard for me to explain on this

> fourm

> > > > but I

> > > > > > > am sure you will take the initiative of reading it, in short

> > every

> > > > > > > observation made my an reference observer will change the

> > > course of

> > > > > > > this obervation directly or indirectly depending on the

> > > observation

> > > > > > > being made. Simply put, there is too much random ness

existent

> > > > in this

> > > > > > > universe to be able to describe anything in any accruancy,

> > > > especially

> > > > > > > when it comes to life or the atomic scale.

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > Now applying the above theories to describe astrology, many

> > of the

> > > > > > > General predictions we make about the past or even the

> future at

> > > > times

> > > > > > > happen to come true, yet there are many more predictions

> we made

> > > > that

> > > > > > > do not come true at all. Because we are juggling between

> > > certainity

> > > > > > > and chaos and that is not the fault or positive aspect of

> anyone

> > > > > > > astrological system but rather the law of nature (God if

> you may

> > > > call

> > > > > > > it). You have claimed in your past emails that KAS is very

> > > accurate

> > > > > > > however on my sincere application of these principles I have

> > > > found it

> > > > > > > smiliar to any other system because the rate of predicition

> > > does not

> > > > > > > change much as compared to prashara or k.p or jaimini

for that

> > > > > matter.

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > It is however a different story if we only look at the

> positive

> > > > aspect

> > > > > > > and not realise the shortcomings of any system. My

approach is

> > > > to look

> > > > > > > at the short comings of this system simply because it

> might help

> > > > > > > improve the system in some other way (again thats not

job). My

> > > sole

> > > > > > > intention for this posting has been to again reiterate on a

> > > > scientific

> > > > > > > ground the limitations of astrology and that of human

mind and

> > > > that no

> > > > > > > matter how hard we try we will be bound by many

> contraints. You

> > > > might

> > > > > > > claim that KAS predictions have come true, but I have

applied

> > > basic

> > > > > > > principles of many charts some of which have yielded

> results but

> > > > again

> > > > > > > some of them have not yielded the correct results (this

I see

> > > > with an

> > > > > > > open mind) leading me to believe and again affirm with the

> > > view that

> > > > > > > astrology has limitations on what can be predicted. Any when

> > > we are

> > > > > > > bound by such limitations then ethically we should take

a more

> > > > > > > cautious approach in predicting in the first place and

> perhaps a

> > > > more

> > > > > > > understanding, less materialistic (making money out of

> > astrology)

> > > > > > > attitude in researching things. This would also involve

being

> > > > open to

> > > > > > > genuine thoughts weather pro or against any system in the

> > > betterment

> > > > > > > of knowledge.

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > To end it Einstein once said " God does not play dice

with the

> > > > > > > Universe " on seeing Quatum Mechanics back in the 30s he was

> > > > > > > diasspointed with QM because he felt there was no free will

> > > and that

> > > > > > > there was no such thing as probablity. A famous Quautum

> > > Theorist (I

> > > > > > > will let you figure out who) responded by saying " Not only

> > > does God

> > > > > > > play dice with Us, He also puts it in places where we cannot

> > find

> > > > > it " .

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > :) I hope you see this message not as a threat to your

> > system but

> > > > > > > rather as an open ended question to ponder on keeping aside

> > > > > > > ego,predjuice or any other negative emotions.

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > regards and Best

> > > > > > > Amit

> > > > > > >

> > > > > >

> > > > >

> > > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > > Be a better Heartthrob. Get better relationship answers from someone

> > who knows.

> > > Answers - Check it out.

> > >

> >

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dear Ash, Actually, i have given this chart in the forum, so i was curious abt this. In this lagna, Moon and Sun, ratio is managable both in rasi and navamsa. In summary chart average. But if we take from navamsa, 3 zero's are there, 1 in SAV. No saturn delay. Jup delay. Thanxs Ash for replying. Regards Anup Ash <kas wrote: Dear Anup, Please refer to my earlier post on this regarding 3 zeroes in SAV in Navamsa. 3 zeroes in navamsa chart can mean delay of marriage and reduction in marital happiness. Delay can be up say 30 years if blessings are not present, but denial should be confirmed from Rasi chart. The navamsa chart is for

spouse, more zeroes there might mean less choice and more expectation. Atleast this is a lead I got, in the brief chat I had with Krushnaji I had on this topic. Good question Anup. Cheers !!! Ash -> http://www.ashtro.ca On Behalf Of

Anup. MThursday September 13, 2007 12:56 PM Subject: Re: Re: Dear Ash et All :On the Creation of Universe and Cosmology as applicable to Dear Harjeet , "us shehar

mein jao,to itna use kehna,baqi na sune koi, sirf tanha usay kehna,kuch log safar kay liye mozo'n (suitable) nahi hotay,kuch raaste kate nahi tanha,itna use kehna" Now tell me,how the quality of a marriage will be, if there is no zero in SAV by any planet and three zero in navamsa :) and What about such case...denial or delay of marriage?? Regards Anup harjeet bakshi <harjeet_bakshi > wrote: Dear Ashji,whenever one of my teacher used to give me smile.. i used to dosomething wrong in solving a problem... but she would not tell me tilli asked her.so did i do something wrong?thanks/regardsharjeet ,

"ashsam73" <kaswrote:>> Dear Harjeet,> > :-)> > Cheers !!!> Ash -> http://www.ashtro.ca> > , "Ash" <kas@> wrote:> >> > Dear Harjeet,> > > > > > > > :-) > > > > > > > > Cheers !!!> > > > Ash -> <http://www.ashtro.ca> http://www.ashtro.ca> > > > _____ > > > > > > On Behalf Of harjeet> > bakshi> > Thursday September 13, 2007 11:19 AM> > > > Re: Dear Ash et All :On the> Creation of> > Universe and Cosmology as applicable to> > > > > > > > Resp. Ashji,> > more over current antra of rahu samdhari to venus and mars.> > mars have more points for 12th compared to 11th.> > venus has 20 for 11th and 17 for 12th.> > rahu in 9th house triggers 12th and 4th house.> > so mars points in ws and rahu's position points to more expenditure in> > current antra.> > moreover antras of mars,saturn,moon,mercury

and sun have less points> > in worsheet for 11th house compared to 12th.> > only jupiter and venus have a just little more points in 11th compared> > to 12th.> > plus the sav in 12th is more than 11th.> > dont we take mean of sav from sun,moon and lagna ?> > anything wrong in my thinking?> > thanks/regards> > harjeet> > > > astrologyandtiminge> > <%40>> vents ,> > "Ash" <kas@> wrote:> > >> > > Dear Amit,> > > > > > > > > > > > With this data u have given,> > > > > > > > > > > > 19th May 1986> > > > > > 12:10 PM> > > > > >

New Delhi> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Planet> > > > > > Degrees> > > > > > > > > As> > > > > > 5 Le 38> > > > > > > > > Su> > > > > > 5 Ta 14> > > > > > > > > Mo> > > > > > 2 Vi 38> > > > > > > > > Ma> > > > > > 27 Sg 51> > > > > > > > > Me> > > > > > 0 Ta 39> > > > > > > > > Ju> > > > > > 25 Aq 40> > > > > > > > > Ve> > > > > > 4 Ge 28> > > > > >

> > > SaR> > > > > > 14 Sc 17> > > > > > > > > Ra> > > > > > 5 Ar 44> > > > > > > > > Ke> > > > > > 5 Li 44> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > House> > > > > > 1> > > > > > 2> > > > > > 3> > > > > > 4> > > > > > 5> > > > > > 6> > > > > > 7> > > > > > 8> > > > > > 9> > > > > > 10> > > > > > 11> > > > > > 12> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > Sun> > >> >><file:///C:\Documents%20and%20Settings\ENagawkar\Desktop\KASMaster.xls#BAV!T> > > 7#BAV!T7> > > > > > > 10> > > > > > 3> > > > > > 3> > > > > > 4> > > > > > 5> > > > > > 5> > > > > > 4> > > > > > 4> > > > > > 3> > > > > > 1> > > > > > 4> > > > > > 6> > > > > > 6> > > > > > 48> > > > > > > > > Moon> > >> >><file:///C:\Documents%20and%20Settings\ENagawkar\Desktop\KASMaster.xls#BAV!A> > > J7#BAV!AJ7> > > > > > > 2> > > > > > 4> > > > > > 6> > > > > > 4> > > > > > 4> > > > > > 4> > > > > > 4> > > > > > 6> > > > > > 5> > > > > > 3> > > > > > 4> > > > > > 2> > > > > > 3> > > > > > 49> > > > > > > > > Mars> > >> >><file:///C:\Documents%20and%20Settings\ENagawkar\Desktop\KASMaster.xls#BAV!D> > > 34#BAV!D34> > >

> > > > 5> > > > > > 2> > > > > > 4> > > > > > 4> > > > > > 4> > > > > > 2> > > > > > 4> > > > > > 3> > > > > > 3> > > > > > 1> > > > > > 3> > > > > > 3> > > > > > 6> > > > > > 39> > > > > > > > > Mercury> > >> >><file:///C:\Documents%20and%20Settings\ENagawkar\Desktop\KASMaster.xls#BAV!T> > > 34#BAV!T34> > > > > > > 10> > > > > > 4> > > > > > 7> > > > > > 5> > > >

> > 2> > > > > > 4> > > > > > 6> > > > > > 4> > > > > > 4> > > > > > 4> > > > > > 3> > > > > > 5> > > > > > 6> > > > > > 54> > > > > > > > > Jupiter> > >> >><file:///C:\Documents%20and%20Settings\ENagawkar\Desktop\KASMaster.xls#BAV!A> > > J34#BAV!AJ34> > > > > > > 7> > > > > > 4> > > > > > 4> > > > > > 5> > > > > > 4> > > > > > 4> > > > > > 6> > > > > > 5> > > > > >

7> > > > > > 4> > > > > > 5> > > > > > 4> > > > > > 4> > > > > > 56> > > > > > > > > Venus> > >> >><file:///C:\Documents%20and%20Settings\ENagawkar\Desktop\KASMaster.xls#BAV!G> > > 61#BAV!G61> > > > > > > 11> > > > > > 5> > > > > > 6> > > > > > 6> > > > > > 4> > > > > > 4> > > > > > 4> > > > > > 3> > > > > > 5> > > > > > 5> > > > > > 2> > > > > > 4> > > > > > 4> >

> > > > 52> > > > > > > > > Saturn> > >> >><file:///C:\Documents%20and%20Settings\ENagawkar\Desktop\KASMaster.xls#BAV!T> > > 61#BAV!T61> > > > > > > 4> > > > > > 2> > > > > > 2> > > > > > 3> > > > > > 5> > > > > > 3> > > > > > 4> > > > > > 4> > > > > > 3> > > > > > 4> > > > > > 4> > > > > > 3> > > > > > 2> > > > > > 39> > > > > > > > > Totals> > > > > > > > > > > >

24> > > > > > 32> > > > > > 31> > > > > > 28> > > > > > 26> > > > > > 32> > > > > > 29> > > > > > 30> > > > > > 22> > > > > > 25> > > > > > 27> > > > > > 31> > > > > > 337> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The points in 12th are more than 11th.> > > > > > > > > > > > In any case, let it be.> > > > > > > > > > > > Cheers !!!> > > > > > Ash -> <http://www.ashtro. <http://www.ashtro.ca> ca>> http://www.ashtro.> > <http://www.ashtro.ca> ca> > > > > > _____ > > > > > > astrologyandtiminge> > <%40>> vents > > > [astrologyandtiminge> > <%40>> vents ]> > On Behalf Of planck12> > > Wednesday September 12, 2007 7:58 PM> > > astrologyandtiminge> > <%40>> vents > > > Re: Dear Ash et All :On the> > Creation of> > > Universe and Cosmology as applicable to> > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Ash, > > > Yes, I completely concur and thats all I wanted to clarify from my> > > end. Again before I leave I have another chart if anyone wantsto use> > > from educational stand point. > > > > > > 19 May 1986> > > 12:10pm > > > new delhi. > > > > > > Again i decided to relate the 11/12th house points, in this chart> > > again the worksheet decided to give more points in 11th house than> > > 12th. But the girl has no savings, he is quite spendrift and have> > > numerous expenses

as compared to her income. > > > > > > Also to double check other things, i decided to check other factors,> > > her brillancy for that matter. I think she has two parts in saturn> > > degrees as shown with the work sheet. But she is not veryintelligent,> > > again a decent girl who is quite jovial, but she has done a> > > certificate course and works in a local bank. As I understand itfrom> > > the notes if one part is in saturn then person has odinary> > > intelligence and if two he/she has good intelligence. In hercase she> > > is normal like anyone else who has no part in saturns division. > > > > > > Feel free to check, incase there are other things required, as is> > > always the case in terms of details. > > > > > > 1. The girl is unmarried> > > 2. Wheatish

complexion > > > 3. works in a bank as teller > > > 4. From a middle class family> > > 5. Has good morals, but tends to be energetic and hyper at times > > > > > > regards> > > Nicked Vish (Amit) I prefer Vish > > > > > > astrologyandtiminge> > > <%40>> > vents (AT) (DOT) <vents%40> com,> > > "Ash" <kas@> wrote:> > > >> > > > Dear Amit / Vishy (?),> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Everyone is entitled to their own opinion and All the morereason we> > > should> > > > get back to KAS :-)> > > > > > > > Cheers !!!> > > > > > > > Ash

-> <http://www.ashtro. <http://www.ashtro.> <http://www.ashtro.ca>> > ca> ca>> > http://www.ashtro.> > > <http://www.ashtro. <http://www.ashtro.ca> ca> ca> > > > > > > > _____ > > > > > > > > astrologyandtiminge> > > <%40>> > vents (AT) (DOT) <vents%40> com> > > > [astrologyandtiminge> > > <%40>> > vents (AT) (DOT) <vents%40>

com]> > > On Behalf Of> > > astroquery12> > > > Wednesday September 12, 2007 7:11 PM> > > > astrologyandtiminge> > > <%40>> > vents (AT) (DOT) <vents%40> com> > > > Dear Ash et All :On the> > Creation of> > > > Universe and Cosmology as applicable to Astr> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > Hope you are doing well. This is Amit again, had posted under a> > > > different name prior but that account did not seem to work and> had to> > > > create a new id. > > > > > > > > I have been following the lessons for a while and again I see many>

> > > in-consistencies with the system. My intention is not to refute or> > > > accept the system but purely to learn it and see itpracticality and> > > > in the process provide my thoughts in opinions (after all the> > > > astrology forum is a free form for discussion). Some of my> doubts have> > > > cropped up again with the usual, 11th house points vs 12th house> > > > points and the actual condition of the charts (again this is only> > > > treating the chart with KAS)as opposed to mixing parashra or k.p> etc. > > > > > > > > On another note, perhaps I can take the liberty to explainagain on> > > > why this happens and hopefully you concur with my points andfacts.> > > > After all astrology will make more meaning if we understand itfrom> > > > all angles. You

are a computer scientist (a man of science)yourself> > > > and perhaps this description will make sense and will take apurely> > > > scientific approach to it: > > > > > > > > I am sure you are familiar at least on the basic level with> Einstein's> > > > relativity and the other theory called Quantum Mechanics.During the> > > > creation of the universe at the point of big bang it is widely> > > > believed that there were four fundamental forces in the universe:> > > > Gravity, electromagnetic, weak nuclear and strong nuclear. It is> also> > > > now very well accepted that relativity explains Gravity very> elegantly> > > > and that the theory has been tested to the point of calculations> > > > pertaning to perhilion of mercury (closest pass to the sun) with>

> > > accuracy. On the other hand Quantum mechanics has done well in> > > > unifying the other three forces of the electromagnetic and nuclear> > > > nature. BUT a BIG TWIST comes into the picture. > > > > > > > > Realivity claims that events (spacetime continum is 4D) are all> > > > associated together and there is no concept of past and future or> > > > present and in simple terms the destiney is already written and> > > > nothing can change it, so given the right set of laws one can> predict> > > > the course of life and the cosmos (relativistic conditions on> > > > cosmology)to a complete accurate picture based on fundametal field> > > > equations of einstein. Again Einstein spent much of his life> finding a> > > > Unified theory that would unify electromagnetics with

gravity BUT> > > FAILED. > > > > > > > > On the other hand QUANTUM MECHANICS claims that nothing in life is> > > > predictable infact everything is a probability. And QM explains> atoms> > > > etc the world of sub atomic very well (this would include thebrain)> > > > the body etc, after all brain is essential a complex neuralnetwork> > > > working on neurotransmitters signals which are electrical in> nature. > > > > So it is quite justified that QM is applicable to us as well> since we> > > > are made of atoms, eletrons etc. But the problem you run into> with QM> > > > is that nothing is certain and that everything is described as a> > > > probablity wave function of something called the scrhorodingers> > > > equation. I would want you to refer to the

thought experimenttermed> > > > "Schroender's Cat" which is hard for me to explain on this fourm> but I> > > > am sure you will take the initiative of reading it, in short every> > > > observation made my an reference observer will change thecourse of> > > > this obervation directly or indirectly depending on theobservation> > > > being made. Simply put, there is too much random ness existent> in this> > > > universe to be able to describe anything in any accruancy,> especially> > > > when it comes to life or the atomic scale. > > > > > > > > Now applying the above theories to describe astrology, many of the> > > > General predictions we make about the past or even the future at> times> > > > happen to come true, yet there are many more predictions we

made> that> > > > do not come true at all. Because we are juggling betweencertainity> > > > and chaos and that is not the fault or positive aspect of anyone> > > > astrological system but rather the law of nature (God if you may> call> > > > it). You have claimed in your past emails that KAS is veryaccurate> > > > however on my sincere application of these principles I have> found it> > > > smiliar to any other system because the rate of predicitiondoes not> > > > change much as compared to prashara or k.p or jaimini for that> > matter. > > > > > > > > It is however a different story if we only look at the positive> aspect> > > > and not realise the shortcomings of any system. My approach is> to look> > > > at the short comings of this system

simply because it might help> > > > improve the system in some other way (again thats not job). Mysole> > > > intention for this posting has been to again reiterate on a> scientific> > > > ground the limitations of astrology and that of human mind and> that no> > > > matter how hard we try we will be bound by many contraints. You> might> > > > claim that KAS predictions have come true, but I have appliedbasic> > > > principles of many charts some of which have yielded results but> again> > > > some of them have not yielded the correct results (this I see> with an> > > > open mind) leading me to believe and again affirm with theview that> > > > astrology has limitations on what can be predicted. Any whenwe are> > > > bound by such limitations then ethically we should

take a more> > > > cautious approach in predicting in the first place and perhaps a> more> > > > understanding, less materialistic (making money out of astrology)> > > > attitude in researching things. This would also involve being> open to> > > > genuine thoughts weather pro or against any system in thebetterment> > > > of knowledge. > > > > > > > > To end it Einstein once said "God does not play dice with the> > > > Universe" on seeing Quatum Mechanics back in the 30s he was> > > > diasspointed with QM because he felt there was no free willand that> > > > there was no such thing as probablity. A famous QuautumTheorist (I> > > > will let you figure out who) responded by saying "Not onlydoes God> > > > play dice with Us, He also puts it in places where we

cannot find> > it". > > > > > > > > :) I hope you see this message not as a threat to your system but> > > > rather as an open ended question to ponder on keeping aside> > > > ego,predjuice or any other negative emotions. > > > > > > > > regards and Best> > > > Amit> > > >> > >> >> Be a better Heartthrob. Get better relationship answers from someone who knows. Answers - Check it out.

Need a vacation? Get great deals to amazing places on Travel.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dear Anup,

Here with 5 mins difference, lagna becomes 20 Ge 00 and Sa goes to

5th house in navamsa. The 3 zeroes in navamsa are 2 in 7th

and 1 in 12th house.

That might even push delay more than 32 years if time is 14:00.

That being said, we must first make sure of the navamsa.

More events might be needed to rectify the lagna correctly.

 

 

Cheers !!!

Ash -> http://www.ashtro.ca

 

 

 

 

 

On Behalf Of Anup. M

Thursday September 13, 2007

11:24 PM

 

Re:

Re: Dear Ash et All :On the Creation of Universe and

Cosmology as applicable to

 

 

 

 

 

 

Sorry three zero in navamsa

 

 

 

 

 

Anup

 

" Anup. M "

<dalh_1 > wrote:

 

 

 

 

 

Dear Ash and Harjeet,

 

 

 

 

 

This was the chart i was aking about, but here one zero in SAV

 

 

and three zero in SAV if we take DST as no.

 

 

 

 

 

February 16Th at 1:55 PM ( afternoon)(13:55) year 1976.

 

 

born in Washington DC ( USA).

 

 

She is unmarried and her father requested for analysis for marriage

prospetcs.

 

 

I think Venus antra can give marriage.

 

 

No Sat delay but Jup delay is there.

 

 

 

 

 

I think Ash is right as he said that delay sometimes can be upto 30

years.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Regards

 

 

Anup

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

harjeet bakshi

<harjeet_bakshi > wrote:

 

 

 

 

Dear Ashji,

thanks for the reply.

bonvoyage.

would wait for more information on that.

thanks/regards

harjeet

 

,

" Ash " <kas wrote:

>

> Dear Harjeet,

>

> I have to rush to the airport, but I did have a brief chat with

Krushanji

> and ask him this scenario.

>

> 3 zereos in navamsa can cause delay, and reduce the happiness. Delay

> sometimes maybe of 30 years.

>

> Thanks for asking this question. I also got some more insight into

this. :-)

>

>

>

> Cheers !!!

>

> Ash -> <http://www.ashtro.ca>

http://www.ashtro.ca

>

> _____

>

>

>

On Behalf Of Ash

> Thursday September 13, 2007 1:31 PM

>

> RE: Re: Dear Ash et All :On the

Creation

> of Universe and Cosmology as applicable to

>

>

>

> Dear Hajreet,

>

> The delay calculations are as per the technique taught, i.e. say if

Sa is in

> 5th house in Navamsa so marriage can get delayed etc etc.

>

> 0's in Rasi chart are used to find delay, but 0 in d-chart has not been

> specified by Krushnaji.

>

> 0's in D chart get covered in the basic strength calculation.

>

>

>

> Cheers !!!

>

> Ash -> <http://www.ashtro.ca>

http://www.ashtro.ca

>

> _____

>

>

>

On Behalf Of harjeet

> bakshi

> Thursday September 13, 2007 1:16 PM

>

> Re: Dear Ash et All :On the

Creation of

> Universe and Cosmology as applicable to

>

>

>

> Dear Anup,

> wah wah!!

> can you please give the birth data so other factors can be seen.

> as per your question if i had to answer without considering other

> factors... i am optimistic.. i would say delayed marriage :).

> remember Krushnaji said.. 50% of effect by planet rest by efforts of

> person. and if there are blessing in chart or from up above..

> thanks/regards

> harjeet

>

> astrologyandtiminge

> <%40>

vents ,

> " Anup. M "

> <dalh_1@> wrote:

> >

> > Dear Harjeet ,

> >

> > " us shehar mein jao,to itna use kehna,

> > baqi na sune koi, sirf tanha usay kehna,

> > kuch log safar kay liye mozo'n (suitable) nahi hotay,

> > kuch raaste kate nahi tanha,itna use kehna "

> >

> > Now tell me,how the quality of a marriage will be, if there is no

> zero in SAV by any planet

> > and three zero in navamsa :) and What about such case...denial or

> delay of marriage??

> >

> > Regards

> > Anup

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> > harjeet bakshi <harjeet_bakshi@> wrote:

> > Dear Ashji,

> > whenever one of my teacher used to give me smile.. i used to do

> > something wrong in solving a problem... but she would not tell me

till

> > i asked her.

> > so did i do something wrong?

> > thanks/regards

> > harjeet

> >

> > astrologyandtiminge

> <%40>

vents ,

> " ashsam73 " <kas@>

> > wrote:

> > >

> > > Dear Harjeet,

> > >

> > > :-)

> > >

> > > Cheers !!!

> > > Ash -> http://www.ashtro.

<http://www.ashtro.ca> ca

> > >

> > > astrologyandtiminge

> <%40>

vents ,

> " Ash " <kas@> wrote:

> > > >

> > > > Dear Harjeet,

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > :-)

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > Cheers !!!

> > > >

> > > > Ash -> <http://www.ashtro.

<http://www.ashtro.ca> ca>

> http://www.ashtro. <http://www.ashtro.ca> ca

> > > >

> > > > _____

> > > >

> > > > astrologyandtiminge

> <%40>

vents

> > > > [astrologyandtiminge

> <%40>

vents ]

> On Behalf Of

> harjeet

> > > > bakshi

> > > > Thursday September 13, 2007 11:19 AM

> > > > astrologyandtiminge

> <%40>

vents

> > > > Re: Dear Ash et

All :On the

> > > Creation of

> > > > Universe and Cosmology as applicable to

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > Resp. Ashji,

> > > > more over current antra of rahu samdhari to venus and mars.

> > > > mars have more points for 12th compared to 11th.

> > > > venus has 20 for 11th and 17 for 12th.

> > > > rahu in 9th house triggers 12th and 4th house.

> > > > so mars points in ws and rahu's position points to more

> expenditure in

> > > > current antra.

> > > > moreover antras of mars,saturn,moon,mercury and sun

have less

points

> > > > in worsheet for 11th house compared to 12th.

> > > > only jupiter and venus have a just little more points in

11th

> compared

> > > > to 12th.

> > > > plus the sav in 12th is more than 11th.

> > > > dont we take mean of sav from sun,moon and lagna ?

> > > > anything wrong in my thinking?

> > > > thanks/regards

> > > > harjeet

> > > >

> > > > astrologyandtiminge

> > > > <%40>

> > > vents (AT) (DOT) <vents%40>

com,

> > > > " Ash " <kas@> wrote:

> > > > >

> > > > > Dear Amit,

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > > With this data u have given,

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > > 19th May 1986

> > > > >

> > > > > 12:10 PM

> > > > >

> > > > > New Delhi

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > > Planet

> > > > >

> > > > > Degrees

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > > As

> > > > >

> > > > > 5 Le 38

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > > Su

> > > > >

> > > > > 5 Ta 14

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > > Mo

> > > > >

> > > > > 2 Vi 38

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > > Ma

> > > > >

> > > > > 27 Sg 51

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > > Me

> > > > >

> > > > > 0 Ta 39

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > > Ju

> > > > >

> > > > > 25 Aq 40

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > > Ve

> > > > >

> > > > > 4 Ge 28

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > > SaR

> > > > >

> > > > > 14 Sc 17

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > > Ra

> > > > >

> > > > > 5 Ar 44

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > > Ke

> > > > >

> > > > > 5 Li 44

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > > House

> > > > >

> > > > > 1

> > > > >

> > > > > 2

> > > > >

> > > > > 3

> > > > >

> > > > > 4

> > > > >

> > > > > 5

> > > > >

> > > > > 6

> > > > >

> > > > > 7

> > > > >

> > > > > 8

> > > > >

> > > > > 9

> > > > >

> > > > > 10

> > > > >

> > > > > 11

> > > > >

> > > > > 12

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > > Sun

> > > > >

> > > >

> > >

> >

>

<file:///C:\Documents%20and%20Settings\ENagawkar\Desktop\KASMaster.xls#BAV!T

> > > > > 7#BAV!T7>

> > > > >

> > > > > 10

> > > > >

> > > > > 3

> > > > >

> > > > > 3

> > > > >

> > > > > 4

> > > > >

> > > > > 5

> > > > >

> > > > > 5

> > > > >

> > > > > 4

> > > > >

> > > > > 4

> > > > >

> > > > > 3

> > > > >

> > > > > 1

> > > > >

> > > > > 4

> > > > >

> > > > > 6

> > > > >

> > > > > 6

> > > > >

> > > > > 48

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > > Moon

> > > > >

> > > >

> > >

> >

>

<file:///C:\Documents%20and%20Settings\ENagawkar\Desktop\KASMaster.xls#BAV!A

> > > > > J7#BAV!AJ7>

> > > > >

> > > > > 2

> > > > >

> > > > > 4

> > > > >

> > > > > 6

> > > > >

> > > > > 4

> > > > >

> > > > > 4

> > > > >

> > > > > 4

> > > > >

> > > > > 4

> > > > >

> > > > > 6

> > > > >

> > > > > 5

> > > > >

> > > > > 3

> > > > >

> > > > > 4

> > > > >

> > > > > 2

> > > > >

> > > > > 3

> > > > >

> > > > > 49

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > > Mars

> > > > >

> > > >

> > >

> >

>

<file:///C:\Documents%20and%20Settings\ENagawkar\Desktop\KASMaster.xls#BAV!D

> > > > > 34#BAV!D34>

> > > > >

> > > > > 5

> > > > >

> > > > > 2

> > > > >

> > > > > 4

> > > > >

> > > > > 4

> > > > >

> > > > > 4

> > > > >

> > > > > 2

> > > > >

> > > > > 4

> > > > >

> > > > > 3

> > > > >

> > > > > 3

> > > > >

> > > > > 1

> > > > >

> > > > > 3

> > > > >

> > > > > 3

> > > > >

> > > > > 6

> > > > >

> > > > > 39

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > > Mercury

> > > > >

> > > >

> > >

> >

>

<file:///C:\Documents%20and%20Settings\ENagawkar\Desktop\KASMaster.xls#BAV!T

> > > > > 34#BAV!T34>

> > > > >

> > > > > 10

> > > > >

> > > > > 4

> > > > >

> > > > > 7

> > > > >

> > > > > 5

> > > > >

> > > > > 2

> > > > >

> > > > > 4

> > > > >

> > > > > 6

> > > > >

> > > > > 4

> > > > >

> > > > > 4

> > > > >

> > > > > 4

> > > > >

> > > > > 3

> > > > >

> > > > > 5

> > > > >

> > > > > 6

> > > > >

> > > > > 54

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > > Jupiter

> > > > >

> > > >

> > >

> >

>

<file:///C:\Documents%20and%20Settings\ENagawkar\Desktop\KASMaster.xls#BAV!A

> > > > > J34#BAV!AJ34>

> > > > >

> > > > > 7

> > > > >

> > > > > 4

> > > > >

> > > > > 4

> > > > >

> > > > > 5

> > > > >

> > > > > 4

> > > > >

> > > > > 4

> > > > >

> > > > > 6

> > > > >

> > > > > 5

> > > > >

> > > > > 7

> > > > >

> > > > > 4

> > > > >

> > > > > 5

> > > > >

> > > > > 4

> > > > >

> > > > > 4

> > > > >

> > > > > 56

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > > Venus

> > > > >

> > > >

> > >

> >

>

<file:///C:\Documents%20and%20Settings\ENagawkar\Desktop\KASMaster.xls#BAV!G

> > > > > 61#BAV!G61>

> > > > >

> > > > > 11

> > > > >

> > > > > 5

> > > > >

> > > > > 6

> > > > >

> > > > > 6

> > > > >

> > > > > 4

> > > > >

> > > > > 4

> > > > >

> > > > > 4

> > > > >

> > > > > 3

> > > > >

> > > > > 5

> > > > >

> > > > > 5

> > > > >

> > > > > 2

> > > > >

> > > > > 4

> > > > >

> > > > > 4

> > > > >

> > > > > 52

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > > Saturn

> > > > >

> > > >

> > >

> >

>

<file:///C:\Documents%20and%20Settings\ENagawkar\Desktop\KASMaster.xls#BAV!T

> > > > > 61#BAV!T61>

> > > > >

> > > > > 4

> > > > >

> > > > > 2

> > > > >

> > > > > 2

> > > > >

> > > > > 3

> > > > >

> > > > > 5

> > > > >

> > > > > 3

> > > > >

> > > > > 4

> > > > >

> > > > > 4

> > > > >

> > > > > 3

> > > > >

> > > > > 4

> > > > >

> > > > > 4

> > > > >

> > > > > 3

> > > > >

> > > > > 2

> > > > >

> > > > > 39

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > > Totals

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > > 24

> > > > >

> > > > > 32

> > > > >

> > > > > 31

> > > > >

> > > > > 28

> > > > >

> > > > > 26

> > > > >

> > > > > 32

> > > > >

> > > > > 29

> > > > >

> > > > > 30

> > > > >

> > > > > 22

> > > > >

> > > > > 25

> > > > >

> > > > > 27

> > > > >

> > > > > 31

> > > > >

> > > > > 337

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > > The points in 12th are more than 11th.

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > > In any case, let it be.

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > > Cheers !!!

> > > > >

> > > > > Ash -> <http://www.ashtro.

<http://www.ashtro.

> <http://www.ashtro.ca>

ca> ca>

> > > http://www.ashtro.

> > > > <http://www.ashtro.

<http://www.ashtro.ca> ca> ca

> > > > >

> > > > > _____

> > > > >

> > > > > astrologyandtiminge

> > > > <%40>

> > > vents (AT) (DOT) <vents%40>

com

> > > > > [astrologyandtiminge

> > > > <%40>

> > > vents (AT) (DOT) <vents%40>

com]

> > > > On Behalf Of planck12

> > > > > Wednesday September 12, 2007 7:58 PM

> > > > > astrologyandtiminge

> > > > <%40>

> > > vents (AT) (DOT) <vents%40>

com

> > > > > Re: Dear Ash

et All :On the

> > > > Creation of

> > > > > Universe and Cosmology as applicable to

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > > Dear Ash,

> > > > > Yes, I completely concur and thats all I wanted to

clarify

from my

> > > > > end. Again before I leave I have another chart if

anyone wants

> > to use

> > > > > from educational stand point.

> > > > >

> > > > > 19 May 1986

> > > > > 12:10pm

> > > > > new delhi.

 

> > > > >

> > > > > Again i decided to relate the 11/12th house points, in

this

chart

> > > > > again the worksheet decided to give more points in

11th

house than

> > > > > 12th. But the girl has no savings, he is quite

spendrift and

have

> > > > > numerous expenses as compared to her income.

> > > > >

> > > > > Also to double check other things, i decided to check

other

> factors,

> > > > > her brillancy for that matter. I think she has two

parts in

saturn

> > > > > degrees as shown with the work sheet. But she is not

very

> > intelligent,

> > > > > again a decent girl who is quite jovial, but she has

done a

> > > > > certificate course and works in a local bank. As I

understand it

> > from

> > > > > the notes if one part is in saturn then person has

odinary

> > > > > intelligence and if two he/she has good intelligence.

In her

> > case she

> > > > > is normal like anyone else who has no part in saturns

division.

> > > > >

> > > > > Feel free to check, incase there are other things

required,

as is

> > > > > always the case in terms of details.

> > > > >

> > > > > 1. The girl is unmarried

> > > > > 2. Wheatish complexion

> > > > > 3. works in a bank as teller

> > > > > 4. From a middle class family

> > > > > 5. Has good morals, but tends to be energetic and

hyper at

times

> > > > >

> > > > > regards

> > > > > Nicked Vish (Amit) I prefer Vish

> > > > >

> > > > > astrologyandtiminge

> > > > > <%40>

> > > > vents (AT) (DOT) <vents%40>

com,

> > > > > " Ash " <kas@> wrote:

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Dear Amit / Vishy (?),

> > > > > >

> > > > > >

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Everyone is entitled to their own opinion and All

the more

> > reason we

> > > > > should

> > > > > > get back to KAS :-)

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Cheers !!!

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Ash -> <http://www.ashtro.

<http://www.ashtro.

> > > <http://www.ashtro. <http://www.ashtro.ca> ca>

> > > > ca> ca>

> > > > http://www.ashtro.

> > > > > <http://www.ashtro.

<http://www.ashtro.

<http://www.ashtro.ca> ca>

> ca> ca

> > > > > >

> > > > > > _____

> > > > > >

> > > > > > astrologyandtiminge

> > > > > <%40>

> > > > vents (AT) (DOT) <vents%40>

com

> > > > > > [astrologyandtiminge

> > > > > <%40>

> > > > vents (AT) (DOT) <vents%40>

com]

> > > > > On Behalf Of

> > > > > astroquery12

> > > > > > Wednesday September 12, 2007 7:11 PM

> > > > > > astrologyandtiminge

> > > > > <%40>

> > > > vents (AT) (DOT) <vents%40>

com

> > > > > > Dear Ash

et All :On the

> > > > Creation of

> > > > > > Universe and Cosmology as applicable to Astr

> > > > > >

> > > > > >

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Hi,

> > > > > > Hope you are doing well. This is Amit again, had

posted

under a

> > > > > > different name prior but that account did not

seem to work and

> > > had to

> > > > > > create a new id.

> > > > > >

> > > > > > I have been following the lessons for a while and

again I

> see many

> > > > > > in-consistencies with the system. My intention is

not to

> refute or

> > > > > > accept the system but purely to learn it and see

it

> > practicality and

> > > > > > in the process provide my thoughts in opinions

(after all the

> > > > > > astrology forum is a free form for discussion).

Some of my

> > > doubts have

> > > > > > cropped up again with the usual, 11th house

points vs 12th

house

> > > > > > points and the actual condition of the charts

(again this is

> only

> > > > > > treating the chart with KAS)as opposed to mixing

parashra

or k.p

> > > etc.

> > > > > >

> > > > > > On another note, perhaps I can take the liberty

to explain

> > again on

> > > > > > why this happens and hopefully you concur with my

points and

> > facts.

> > > > > > After all astrology will make more meaning if we

understand it

> > from

> > > > > > all angles. You are a computer scientist (a man

of science)

> > yourself

> > > > > > and perhaps this description will make sense and

will take a

> > purely

> > > > > > scientific approach to it:

> > > > > >

> > > > > > I am sure you are familiar at least on the basic

level with

> > > Einstein's

> > > > > > relativity and the other theory called Quantum

Mechanics.

> > During the

> > > > > > creation of the universe at the point of big bang

it is widely

> > > > > > believed that there were four fundamental forces

in the

> universe:

> > > > > > Gravity, electromagnetic, weak nuclear and strong

nuclear.

It is

> > > also

> > > > > > now very well accepted that relativity explains

Gravity very

> > > elegantly

> > > > > > and that the theory has been tested to the point

of

calculations

> > > > > > pertaning to perhilion of mercury (closest pass

to the

sun) with

> > > > > > accuracy. On the other hand Quantum mechanics has

done well in

> > > > > > unifying the other three forces of the electromagnetic

and

> nuclear

> > > > > > nature. BUT a BIG TWIST comes into the picture.

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Realivity claims that events (spacetime continum

is 4D)

are all

> > > > > > associated together and there is no concept of

past and

> future or

> > > > > > present and in simple terms the destiney is

already

written and

> > > > > > nothing can change it, so given the right set of

laws one can

> > > predict

> > > > > > the course of life and the cosmos (relativistic

conditions on

> > > > > > cosmology)to a complete accurate picture based on

fundametal

> field

> > > > > > equations of einstein. Again Einstein spent much

of his life

> > > finding a

> > > > > > Unified theory that would unify electromagnetics

with

> gravity BUT

> > > > > FAILED.

> > > > > >

> > > > > > On the other hand QUANTUM MECHANICS claims that

nothing in

> life is

> > > > > > predictable infact everything is a probability.

And QM

explains

> > > atoms

> > > > > > etc the world of sub atomic very well (this would

include the

> > brain)

> > > > > > the body etc, after all brain is essential a

complex neural

> > network

> > > > > > working on neurotransmitters signals which are

electrical in

> > > nature.

> > > > > > So it is quite justified that QM is applicable to

us as well

> > > since we

> > > > > > are made of atoms, eletrons etc. But the problem

you run into

> > > with QM

> > > > > > is that nothing is certain and that everything is

described as a

> > > > > > probablity wave function of something called the

scrhorodingers

> > > > > > equation. I would want you to refer to the

thought experiment

> > termed

> > > > > > " Schroender's Cat " which is hard

for me to explain on this

fourm

> > > but I

> > > > > > am sure you will take the initiative of reading

it, in short

> every

> > > > > > observation made my an reference observer will

change the

> > course of

> > > > > > this obervation directly or indirectly depending

on the

> > observation

> > > > > > being made. Simply put, there is too much random

ness existent

> > > in this

> > > > > > universe to be able to describe anything in any

accruancy,

> > > especially

> > > > > > when it comes to life or the atomic scale.

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Now applying the above theories to describe

astrology, many

> of the

> > > > > > General predictions we make about the past or

even the

future at

> > > times

> > > > > > happen to come true, yet there are many more

predictions

we made

> > > that

> > > > > > do not come true at all. Because we are juggling

between

> > certainity

> > > > > > and chaos and that is not the fault or positive

aspect of

anyone

> > > > > > astrological system but rather the law of nature

(God if

you may

> > > call

> > > > > > it). You have claimed in your past emails that

KAS is very

> > accurate

> > > > > > however on my sincere application of these

principles I have

> > > found it

> > > > > > smiliar to any other system because the rate of

predicition

> > does not

> > > > > > change much as compared to prashara or k.p or

jaimini for that

> > > > matter.

> > > > > >

> > > > > > It is however a different story if we only look

at the

positive

> > > aspect

> > > > > > and not realise the shortcomings of any system.

My approach is

> > > to look

> > > > > > at the short comings of this system simply

because it

might help

> > > > > > improve the system in some other way (again thats

not job). My

> > sole

> > > > > > intention for this posting has been to again

reiterate on a

> > > scientific

> > > > > > ground the limitations of astrology and that of

human mind and

> > > that no

> > > > > > matter how hard we try we will be bound by many

contraints. You

> > > might

> > > > > > claim that KAS predictions have come true, but I

have applied

> > basic

> > > > > > principles of many charts some of which have

yielded

results but

> > > again

> > > > > > some of them have not yielded the correct results

(this I see

> > > with an

> > > > > > open mind) leading me to believe and again affirm

with the

> > view that

> > > > > > astrology has limitations on what can be

predicted. Any when

> > we are

> > > > > > bound by such limitations then ethically we

should take a more

> > > > > > cautious approach in predicting in the first

place and

perhaps a

> > > more

> > > > > > understanding, less materialistic (making money

out of

> astrology)

> > > > > > attitude in researching things. This would also

involve being

> > > open to

> > > > > > genuine thoughts weather pro or against any

system in the

> > betterment

> > > > > > of knowledge.

> > > > > >

> > > > > > To end it Einstein once said " God does not

play dice with the

> > > > > > Universe " on seeing Quatum Mechanics back in

the 30s he was

> > > > > > diasspointed with QM because he felt there was no

free will

> > and that

> > > > > > there was no such thing as probablity. A famous

Quautum

> > Theorist (I

> > > > > > will let you figure out who) responded by saying

" Not only

> > does God

> > > > > > play dice with Us, He also puts it in places

where we cannot

> find

> > > > it " .

> > > > > >

> > > > > > :) I hope you see this message not as a threat to

your

> system but

> > > > > > rather as an open ended question to ponder on

keeping aside

> > > > > > ego,predjuice or any other negative emotions.

> > > > > >

> > > > > > regards and Best

> > > > > > Amit

> > > > > >

> > > > >

> > > >

> > >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> > Be a better Heartthrob. Get better relationship answers from someone

> who knows.

> > Answers - Check it out.

> >

>

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Be a better Heartthrob. Get

better relationship answers from someone who knows.

Answers - Check it out.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Fussy? Opinionated? Impossible to please? Perfect. Join

's user panel and lay it on us.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dear Ash, Thankyou for explaining this delay factor.Inadvertantly, i overlooked Saturn might cause delay being in Sun navamsa if we take time as 02.00pm. True,in such case as you say, more events required for confirming lagna. So we sld first confirm lagna in Rasi, no matter it is not on borderline but even then navamsa is also important. Regards Anup Ash <kas wrote: Dear Anup, Here with 5 mins difference, lagna becomes 20 Ge 00 and Sa goes to 5th house in navamsa. The 3 zeroes in navamsa are 2 in 7th and 1 in 12th house. That might even push delay more than 32 years if time is 14:00. That being said, we must first make sure of the navamsa. More events might be needed to rectify the lagna correctly. Cheers !!! Ash -> http://www.ashtro.ca On Behalf Of Anup. MThursday September 13, 2007 11:24 PM Subject: Re: Re: Dear Ash et All :On the Creation of Universe and Cosmology as applicable

to Sorry three zero in navamsa Anup"Anup. M" <dalh_1 > wrote: Dear Ash and

Harjeet, This was the chart i was aking about, but here one zero in SAV and three zero in SAV if we take DST as no. February 16Th at 1:55 PM ( afternoon)(13:55) year 1976. born in Washington DC ( USA). She is unmarried and her father requested for analysis for marriage prospetcs. I think Venus antra can give marriage. No Sat delay but Jup delay is there. I think Ash is right as he said that delay sometimes can be upto 30

years. Regards Anup harjeet bakshi <harjeet_bakshi > wrote: Dear Ashji,thanks for the reply.bonvoyage.would wait for more information on that.thanks/regardsharjeet , "Ash" <kas wrote:>> Dear

Harjeet,> > I have to rush to the airport, but I did have a brief chat withKrushanji> and ask him this scenario.> > 3 zereos in navamsa can cause delay, and reduce the happiness. Delay> sometimes maybe of 30 years.> > Thanks for asking this question. I also got some more insight intothis. :-)> > > > Cheers !!!> > Ash -> <http://www.ashtro.ca> http://www.ashtro.ca> > _____ > > > On Behalf Of Ash> Thursday September 13, 2007 1:31 PM> > RE: Re: Dear Ash et All :On theCreation> of Universe and Cosmology as applicable to> > > > Dear Hajreet,> > The delay calculations are as per the technique taught, i.e. say ifSa is in> 5th house in Navamsa so marriage can get delayed etc etc.> > 0's in Rasi chart are used to find delay, but 0 in d-chart has not been> specified by Krushnaji.> > 0's in D chart get covered in the basic strength calculation. > > > > Cheers !!!> > Ash -> <http://www.ashtro.ca> http://www.ashtro.ca> > _____ > > > On Behalf Of harjeet> bakshi> Thursday September 13, 2007 1:16 PM> > Re: Dear Ash et All :On theCreation of> Universe and Cosmology as applicable to> > > > Dear Anup,> wah wah!!> can you please give the birth data so other factors can be seen.> as per your question if i had to answer without considering other> factors... i am optimistic.. i would say delayed marriage :).> remember Krushnaji said.. 50% of effect by planet rest by efforts of> person. and if there are

blessing in chart or from up above..> thanks/regards> harjeet> > astrologyandtiminge> <%40>vents ,> "Anup. M"> <dalh_1@> wrote:> >> > Dear Harjeet ,> > > > "us shehar mein jao,to itna use kehna,> > baqi na sune koi, sirf tanha usay kehna,> > kuch log safar kay liye mozo'n (suitable) nahi hotay,> > kuch raaste kate nahi tanha,itna use kehna"> > > > Now tell me,how the quality of a marriage will be, if there is no> zero in SAV by any planet > > and three zero in navamsa :) and What about such case...denial or> delay of marriage??> > > > Regards> > Anup> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > harjeet bakshi <harjeet_bakshi@> wrote:> > Dear Ashji,> > whenever one of my teacher used to give me smile.. i used to do> > something wrong in solving a problem... but she would not tell me till> > i asked her.> > so did i do something wrong?> > thanks/regards> > harjeet> > > > astrologyandtiminge> <%40>vents ,> "ashsam73" <kas@>> > wrote:> > >> > > Dear Harjeet,> > > > > > :-)> > > > > > Cheers !!!> > > Ash -> http://www.ashtro. <http://www.ashtro.ca> ca> > > > >

> astrologyandtiminge> <%40>vents ,> "Ash" <kas@> wrote:> > > >> > > > Dear Harjeet,> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > :-) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cheers !!!> > > > > > > > Ash -> <http://www.ashtro. <http://www.ashtro.ca> ca>> http://www.ashtro. <http://www.ashtro.ca> ca> > > > > > > > _____ > > > > > > > > astrologyandtiminge>

<%40>vents > > > > [astrologyandtiminge> <%40>vents ]> On Behalf Of> harjeet> > > > bakshi> > > > Thursday September 13, 2007 11:19 AM> > > > astrologyandtiminge> <%40>vents > > > > Re: Dear Ash et All :On the> > > Creation of> > > > Universe and Cosmology as applicable to> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Resp.

Ashji,> > > > more over current antra of rahu samdhari to venus and mars.> > > > mars have more points for 12th compared to 11th.> > > > venus has 20 for 11th and 17 for 12th.> > > > rahu in 9th house triggers 12th and 4th house.> > > > so mars points in ws and rahu's position points to more> expenditure in> > > > current antra.> > > > moreover antras of mars,saturn,moon,mercury and sun have lesspoints> > > > in worsheet for 11th house compared to 12th.> > > > only jupiter and venus have a just little more points in 11th> compared> > > > to 12th.> > > > plus the sav in 12th is more than 11th.> > > > dont we take mean of sav from sun,moon and lagna ?> > > > anything wrong in my thinking?> > > > thanks/regards> > > >

harjeet> > > > > > > > astrologyandtiminge> > > > <%40>> > > vents (AT) (DOT) <vents%40> com,> > > > "Ash" <kas@> wrote:> > > > >> > > > > Dear Amit,> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > With this data u have given,> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 19th May 1986> > > > > > > > > > 12:10 PM> > > > > > > > > > New Delhi> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > Planet> > > > > > > > > > Degrees> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > As> > > > > > > > > > 5 Le 38> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Su> > > > > > > > > > 5 Ta 14> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Mo> > > > > > > > > > 2 Vi 38> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Ma> > > > > > > > > > 27 Sg 51> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Me> > > > > > > > > > 0 Ta 39> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Ju> > > >

> > > > > > 25 Aq 40> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Ve> > > > > > > > > > 4 Ge 28> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > SaR> > > > > > > > > > 14 Sc 17> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Ra> > > > > > > > > > 5 Ar 44> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Ke> > > > > > > > > > 5 Li 44> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > House> > > > > > > > > >

1> > > > > > > > > > 2> > > > > > > > > > 3> > > > > > > > > > 4> > > > > > > > > > 5> > > > > > > > > > 6> > > > > > > > > > 7> > > > > > > > > > 8> > > > > > > > > > 9> > > > > > > > > > 10> > > > > > > > > > 11> > > > > > > > > > 12> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Sun> > > > >> > > >> > >> >><file:///C:\Documents%20and%20Settings\ENagawkar\Desktop\KASMaster.xls#BAV!T> > > > > 7#BAV!T7> > > > > > > > > > > 10> > > > > > > > > > 3> > > > > > > > > > 3> > > > > > > > > > 4> > > > > > > > > > 5> > > > > > > > > > 5> > > > > > > > > > 4> > > > > > > > > > 4> > > > > > > > > > 3> > > > > > > > > > 1> > > > > > > > > > 4> > > > > > > > > > 6> > > > > > > > > > 6> > > > > > > > >

> 48> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Moon> > > > >> > > >> > >> >><file:///C:\Documents%20and%20Settings\ENagawkar\Desktop\KASMaster.xls#BAV!A> > > > > J7#BAV!AJ7> > > > > > > > > > > 2> > > > > > > > > > 4> > > > > > > > > > 6> > > > > > > > > > 4> > > > > > > > > > 4> > > > > > > > > > 4> > > > > > > > > > 4> > > > > > > > > > 6> > > > > > > > > > 5> > > > > > > > > > 3> > > > >

> > > > > 4> > > > > > > > > > 2> > > > > > > > > > 3> > > > > > > > > > 49> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Mars> > > > >> > > >> > >> >><file:///C:\Documents%20and%20Settings\ENagawkar\Desktop\KASMaster.xls#BAV!D> > > > > 34#BAV!D34> > > > > > > > > > > 5> > > > > > > > > > 2> > > > > > > > > > 4> > > > > > > > > > 4> > > > > > > > > > 4> > > > > > > > > > 2> > > > > > > > > > 4>

> > > > > > > > > 3> > > > > > > > > > 3> > > > > > > > > > 1> > > > > > > > > > 3> > > > > > > > > > 3> > > > > > > > > > 6> > > > > > > > > > 39> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Mercury> > > > >> > > >> > >> >><file:///C:\Documents%20and%20Settings\ENagawkar\Desktop\KASMaster.xls#BAV!T> > > > > 34#BAV!T34> > > > > > > > > > > 10> > > > > > > > > > 4> > > > > > > > > > 7> > > > > > >

> > > 5> > > > > > > > > > 2> > > > > > > > > > 4> > > > > > > > > > 6> > > > > > > > > > 4> > > > > > > > > > 4> > > > > > > > > > 4> > > > > > > > > > 3> > > > > > > > > > 5> > > > > > > > > > 6> > > > > > > > > > 54> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Jupiter> > > > >> > > >> > >> >><file:///C:\Documents%20and%20Settings\ENagawkar\Desktop\KASMaster.xls#BAV!A> > > > > J34#BAV!AJ34> > >

> > > > > > > > 7> > > > > > > > > > 4> > > > > > > > > > 4> > > > > > > > > > 5> > > > > > > > > > 4> > > > > > > > > > 4> > > > > > > > > > 6> > > > > > > > > > 5> > > > > > > > > > 7> > > > > > > > > > 4> > > > > > > > > > 5> > > > > > > > > > 4> > > > > > > > > > 4> > > > > > > > > > 56> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Venus> > > > >> > > >> > >>

>><file:///C:\Documents%20and%20Settings\ENagawkar\Desktop\KASMaster.xls#BAV!G> > > > > 61#BAV!G61> > > > > > > > > > > 11> > > > > > > > > > 5> > > > > > > > > > 6> > > > > > > > > > 6> > > > > > > > > > 4> > > > > > > > > > 4> > > > > > > > > > 4> > > > > > > > > > 3> > > > > > > > > > 5> > > > > > > > > > 5> > > > > > > > > > 2> > > > > > > > > > 4> > > > > > > > > > 4> > > > >

> > > > > 52> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Saturn> > > > >> > > >> > >> >><file:///C:\Documents%20and%20Settings\ENagawkar\Desktop\KASMaster.xls#BAV!T> > > > > 61#BAV!T61> > > > > > > > > > > 4> > > > > > > > > > 2> > > > > > > > > > 2> > > > > > > > > > 3> > > > > > > > > > 5> > > > > > > > > > 3> > > > > > > > > > 4> > > > > > > > > > 4> > > > > > > > > > 3> > > > > > > > > >

4> > > > > > > > > > 4> > > > > > > > > > 3> > > > > > > > > > 2> > > > > > > > > > 39> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Totals> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 24> > > > > > > > > > 32> > > > > > > > > > 31> > > > > > > > > > 28> > > > > > > > > > 26> > > > > > > > > > 32> > > > > > > > > > 29> > > > > > > > > > 30> > > > > > > > > > 22> > > > > > > > > >

25> > > > > > > > > > 27> > > > > > > > > > 31> > > > > > > > > > 337> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The points in 12th are more than 11th.> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > In any case, let it be.> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cheers !!!> > > > > > > > > > Ash -> <http://www.ashtro. <http://www.ashtro.> <http://www.ashtro.ca> ca> ca>> > > http://www.ashtro.> > > > <http://www.ashtro. <http://www.ashtro.ca> ca> ca> > > > > > > > > > _____ > > > > > > > > > > astrologyandtiminge> > > > <%40>> > > vents (AT) (DOT) <vents%40> com> > > > > [astrologyandtiminge> > > > <%40>> > > vents (AT) (DOT) <vents%40> com]> > > > On Behalf Of planck12> > > > > Wednesday September 12, 2007 7:58 PM> > > > > astrologyandtiminge> > > >

<%40>> > > vents (AT) (DOT) <vents%40> com> > > > > Re: Dear Ash et All :On the> > > > Creation of> > > > > Universe and Cosmology as applicable to> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Ash, > > > > > Yes, I completely concur and thats all I wanted to clarifyfrom my> > > > > end. Again before I leave I have another chart if anyone wants> > to use> > > > > from educational stand point. > > > > > > > > > > 19 May 1986> > > > > 12:10pm > > > > > new delhi. > > > > > > > > > > Again

i decided to relate the 11/12th house points, in thischart> > > > > again the worksheet decided to give more points in 11thhouse than> > > > > 12th. But the girl has no savings, he is quite spendrift andhave> > > > > numerous expenses as compared to her income. > > > > > > > > > > Also to double check other things, i decided to check other> factors,> > > > > her brillancy for that matter. I think she has two parts insaturn> > > > > degrees as shown with the work sheet. But she is not very> > intelligent,> > > > > again a decent girl who is quite jovial, but she has done a> > > > > certificate course and works in a local bank. As I understand it> > from> > > > > the notes if one part is in saturn then person has odinary> > > >

> intelligence and if two he/she has good intelligence. In her> > case she> > > > > is normal like anyone else who has no part in saturns division. > > > > > > > > > > Feel free to check, incase there are other things required,as is> > > > > always the case in terms of details. > > > > > > > > > > 1. The girl is unmarried> > > > > 2. Wheatish complexion > > > > > 3. works in a bank as teller > > > > > 4. From a middle class family> > > > > 5. Has good morals, but tends to be energetic and hyper attimes > > > > > > > > > > regards> > > > > Nicked Vish (Amit) I prefer Vish > > > > > > > > > > astrologyandtiminge> > > > >

<%40>> > > > vents (AT) (DOT) <vents%40> com,> > > > > "Ash" <kas@> wrote:> > > > > >> > > > > > Dear Amit / Vishy (?),> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Everyone is entitled to their own opinion and All the more> > reason we> > > > > should> > > > > > get back to KAS :-)> > > > > > > > > > > > Cheers !!!> > > > > > > > > > > > Ash -> <http://www.ashtro. <http://www.ashtro.> > > <http://www.ashtro. <http://www.ashtro.ca> ca>> > > > ca> ca>> > > > http://www.ashtro.> > > > > <http://www.ashtro. <http://www.ashtro.<http://www.ashtro.ca> ca>> ca> ca> > > > > > > > > > > > _____ > > > > > > > > > > > > astrologyandtiminge> > > > > <%40>> > > > vents (AT) (DOT) <vents%40> com> > > > > > [astrologyandtiminge> > > > > <%40>> > > >

vents (AT) (DOT) <vents%40> com]> > > > > On Behalf Of> > > > > astroquery12> > > > > > Wednesday September 12, 2007 7:11 PM> > > > > > astrologyandtiminge> > > > > <%40>> > > > vents (AT) (DOT) <vents%40> com> > > > > > Dear Ash et All :On the> > > > Creation of> > > > > > Universe and Cosmology as applicable to Astr> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > Hope you are doing well. This is Amit again, had postedunder a> > > > > > different name

prior but that account did not seem to work and> > > had to> > > > > > create a new id. > > > > > > > > > > > > I have been following the lessons for a while and again I> see many> > > > > > in-consistencies with the system. My intention is not to> refute or> > > > > > accept the system but purely to learn it and see it> > practicality and> > > > > > in the process provide my thoughts in opinions (after all the> > > > > > astrology forum is a free form for discussion). Some of my> > > doubts have> > > > > > cropped up again with the usual, 11th house points vs 12thhouse> > > > > > points and the actual condition of the charts (again this is> only> > > > > > treating the chart with KAS)as opposed

to mixing parashraor k.p> > > etc. > > > > > > > > > > > > On another note, perhaps I can take the liberty to explain> > again on> > > > > > why this happens and hopefully you concur with my points and> > facts.> > > > > > After all astrology will make more meaning if we understand it> > from> > > > > > all angles. You are a computer scientist (a man of science)> > yourself> > > > > > and perhaps this description will make sense and will take a> > purely> > > > > > scientific approach to it: > > > > > > > > > > > > I am sure you are familiar at least on the basic level with> > > Einstein's> > > > > > relativity and the other theory called Quantum Mechanics.> > During

the> > > > > > creation of the universe at the point of big bang it is widely> > > > > > believed that there were four fundamental forces in the> universe:> > > > > > Gravity, electromagnetic, weak nuclear and strong nuclear.It is> > > also> > > > > > now very well accepted that relativity explains Gravity very> > > elegantly> > > > > > and that the theory has been tested to the point ofcalculations> > > > > > pertaning to perhilion of mercury (closest pass to thesun) with> > > > > > accuracy. On the other hand Quantum mechanics has done well in> > > > > > unifying the other three forces of the electromagnetic and> nuclear> > > > > > nature. BUT a BIG TWIST comes into the picture. > > > > > > > >

> > > > Realivity claims that events (spacetime continum is 4D)are all> > > > > > associated together and there is no concept of past and> future or> > > > > > present and in simple terms the destiney is alreadywritten and> > > > > > nothing can change it, so given the right set of laws one can> > > predict> > > > > > the course of life and the cosmos (relativistic conditions on> > > > > > cosmology)to a complete accurate picture based on fundametal> field> > > > > > equations of einstein. Again Einstein spent much of his life> > > finding a> > > > > > Unified theory that would unify electromagnetics with> gravity BUT> > > > > FAILED. > > > > > > > > > > > > On the other hand QUANTUM MECHANICS

claims that nothing in> life is> > > > > > predictable infact everything is a probability. And QMexplains> > > atoms> > > > > > etc the world of sub atomic very well (this would include the> > brain)> > > > > > the body etc, after all brain is essential a complex neural> > network> > > > > > working on neurotransmitters signals which are electrical in> > > nature. > > > > > > So it is quite justified that QM is applicable to us as well> > > since we> > > > > > are made of atoms, eletrons etc. But the problem you run into> > > with QM> > > > > > is that nothing is certain and that everything isdescribed as a> > > > > > probablity wave function of something called thescrhorodingers> > > > >

> equation. I would want you to refer to the thought experiment> > termed> > > > > > "Schroender's Cat" which is hard for me to explain on thisfourm> > > but I> > > > > > am sure you will take the initiative of reading it, in short> every> > > > > > observation made my an reference observer will change the> > course of> > > > > > this obervation directly or indirectly depending on the> > observation> > > > > > being made. Simply put, there is too much random ness existent> > > in this> > > > > > universe to be able to describe anything in any accruancy,> > > especially> > > > > > when it comes to life or the atomic scale. > > > > > > > > > > > > Now applying the above theories to describe

astrology, many> of the> > > > > > General predictions we make about the past or even thefuture at> > > times> > > > > > happen to come true, yet there are many more predictionswe made> > > that> > > > > > do not come true at all. Because we are juggling between> > certainity> > > > > > and chaos and that is not the fault or positive aspect ofanyone> > > > > > astrological system but rather the law of nature (God ifyou may> > > call> > > > > > it). You have claimed in your past emails that KAS is very> > accurate> > > > > > however on my sincere application of these principles I have> > > found it> > > > > > smiliar to any other system because the rate of predicition> > does not> > >

> > > change much as compared to prashara or k.p or jaimini for that> > > > matter. > > > > > > > > > > > > It is however a different story if we only look at thepositive> > > aspect> > > > > > and not realise the shortcomings of any system. My approach is> > > to look> > > > > > at the short comings of this system simply because itmight help> > > > > > improve the system in some other way (again thats not job). My> > sole> > > > > > intention for this posting has been to again reiterate on a> > > scientific> > > > > > ground the limitations of astrology and that of human mind and> > > that no> > > > > > matter how hard we try we will be bound by manycontraints. You> > > might> >

> > > > claim that KAS predictions have come true, but I have applied> > basic> > > > > > principles of many charts some of which have yieldedresults but> > > again> > > > > > some of them have not yielded the correct results (this I see> > > with an> > > > > > open mind) leading me to believe and again affirm with the> > view that> > > > > > astrology has limitations on what can be predicted. Any when> > we are> > > > > > bound by such limitations then ethically we should take a more> > > > > > cautious approach in predicting in the first place andperhaps a> > > more> > > > > > understanding, less materialistic (making money out of> astrology)> > > > > > attitude in researching things. This would also

involve being> > > open to> > > > > > genuine thoughts weather pro or against any system in the> > betterment> > > > > > of knowledge. > > > > > > > > > > > > To end it Einstein once said "God does not play dice with the> > > > > > Universe" on seeing Quatum Mechanics back in the 30s he was> > > > > > diasspointed with QM because he felt there was no free will> > and that> > > > > > there was no such thing as probablity. A famous Quautum> > Theorist (I> > > > > > will let you figure out who) responded by saying "Not only> > does God> > > > > > play dice with Us, He also puts it in places where we cannot> find> > > > it". > > > > > > > > > > > > :) I hope you

see this message not as a threat to your> system but> > > > > > rather as an open ended question to ponder on keeping aside> > > > > > ego,predjuice or any other negative emotions. > > > > > > > > > > > > regards and Best> > > > > > Amit> > > > > >> > > > >> > > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Be a better Heartthrob. Get better relationship answers from someone> who knows.> > Answers - Check it out.> >> Be a better Heartthrob. Get better relationship answers from someone who knows. Answers - Check it out. Fussy? Opinionated? Impossible to please? Perfect. Join 's user panel and lay it on us.

Be a better Globetrotter. Get better travel answers from someone who knows. Answers - Check it out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dear Ash and Anup,

 

To Ash:

I do apologies for the mix up of points on the previous chart and yes

you are correct that the 12th house has more points than 11th. I was

looking at the JHL software which showed 11th had more than 12th. Well

my apologise.

 

To Anup and Ash as well:

 

Well I give below more charts (taken from various sources online

familiar to all of us through astrology groups etc) common people

having the same set of common problems - no savings and more fiances,

here is a listing of 5 charts (there are more) I have double checked

them for the 11/12 house and all of these charts have more points in

11th house as opposed to the 12th. Yet, the natives complain of more

expenses and no savings, a few of the charts are of singles and a few

of married. A few own businesses and a few are into service.

 

 

NOTE: I have included the specific website addresses so that you may

see for yourself the particular queries they natives have put forth.

 

I will be happy to provide more charts where 11th house has more

points than 12th and yet the native is in debts or has more expenses

than income.

 

Regards

Amit

 

 

 

 

1. Dinesh Patel (Financial Crises, unable to save money due to

expenses on medicine)

My Date of Birth Date is – 21.05.1979

Birth Place is Mumbai

Birth time is 7.30 pm

http://en.allexperts.com/q/Astrology-2205/solve-problem.htm

 

2. DOB-02.11.1981 (Financial crises, unable to save money claims more

expenses than savings at the end of the month)

TOB-11.18AM

POB-REWA(MP) Latitude: 24° 32'North Longitude: 81° 18'East

 

regards,

Sandeep Tiwari.

vedic astrology/message/96309

 

3.

TOB - 3.00 PM

DOB - 6TH SEPT,1966

POB -BARODA GUJARAT INDIA

 

THANKS.....

 

VIJAY

vedic astrology/message/83060

 

4. birth details are- dob- 29th april 1979

time- 6:30 am

place- danapur (bihar)

85E03 & 25N38

 

 

http://www.ammas.com/ar/home.cfm?r=va & topicid=23 & bid=0 & qid=134333

 

 

 

5. > My birth details:

> Date of Birth: 14-06-1960

> Time of Birth: 15.10 hrs

> Place of Birth: Palakkad, Kerala

 

vedic astrology/message/92286

 

 

 

 

 

, " Anup. M "

<dalh_1 wrote:

>

> Dear Ramesh,

>

> The topic was changed deliberately as you

know this was started by the same person bearing some other ID.Also,

if you note the contents of all his previous mails, i dont think we

will be learning something out of this except wasting our time.

> Just note the words Ash has used after finishing his reply to his

mail

>

> " The points in 12th are more than 11th,

> in any case let it be. "

>

> I hope you will understand that we all are here to learn and can

not accept

> less than KAS here:)

> I was also expecting your comments being a senior on this topic.

> Your views and experience is also worth for a junior like me.

> Regards

> Anup

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

ramesh mishra <aarceemastro2002 wrote:

> Dear Anup, Harjeet and all,

> I would like to advice that once a chain is started on some topic

or on a particular chat please do not mix up the chain with some other

topic/ chart.

> Hope you understand my point. If it is mixed up with other topic,

it becomes difficult for us to understand the chart that on what topic

discussion was going on.

> For e.g. take this topic only.This topic was started by any one of

our friend and it continues with some other topic.

> It will be better for us to stop the chain and pose the topic with

some other chain so it will be easy for us to understand or to refer

that chain.

> Please do not take it in other way. If you feel it is correct then

OK otherwise also it is fine.

> Thanks and regards.

> Ramesh Mishra

>

> " Anup. M " <dalh_1 wrote:

> Sorry three zero in navamsa

>

> Anup

>

> " Anup. M " <dalh_1 wrote:

> Dear Ash and Harjeet,

>

> This was the chart i was aking about, but here

one zero in SAV

> and three zero in SAV if we take DST as no.

>

> February 16Th at 1:55 PM ( afternoon)(13:55) year 1976.

> born in Washington DC ( USA).

> She is unmarried and her father requested for analysis for

marriage prospetcs.

> I think Venus antra can give marriage.

> No Sat delay but Jup delay is there.

>

> I think Ash is right as he said that delay sometimes can be upto

30 years.

>

>

> Regards

> Anup

>

harjeet bakshi <harjeet_bakshi wrote:

> Dear Ashji,

> thanks for the reply.

> bonvoyage.

> would wait for more information on that.

> thanks/regards

> harjeet

>

> , " Ash " <kas@> wrote:

> >

> > Dear Harjeet,

> >

> > I have to rush to the airport, but I did have a brief chat with

> Krushanji

> > and ask him this scenario.

> >

> > 3 zereos in navamsa can cause delay, and reduce the happiness. Delay

> > sometimes maybe of 30 years.

> >

> > Thanks for asking this question. I also got some more insight into

> this. :-)

> >

> >

> >

> > Cheers !!!

> >

> > Ash -> <http://www.ashtro.ca> http://www.ashtro.ca

> >

> > _____

> >

> >

> > On Behalf Of Ash

> > Thursday September 13, 2007 1:31 PM

> >

> > RE: Re: Dear Ash et All :On the

> Creation

> > of Universe and Cosmology as applicable to

> >

> >

> >

> > Dear Hajreet,

> >

> > The delay calculations are as per the technique taught, i.e. say if

> Sa is in

> > 5th house in Navamsa so marriage can get delayed etc etc.

> >

> > 0's in Rasi chart are used to find delay, but 0 in d-chart has not

been

> > specified by Krushnaji.

> >

> > 0's in D chart get covered in the basic strength calculation.

> >

> >

> >

> > Cheers !!!

> >

> > Ash -> <http://www.ashtro.ca> http://www.ashtro.ca

> >

> > _____

> >

> >

> > On Behalf Of harjeet

> > bakshi

> > Thursday September 13, 2007 1:16 PM

> >

> > Re: Dear Ash et All :On the

> Creation of

> > Universe and Cosmology as applicable to

> >

> >

> >

> > Dear Anup,

> > wah wah!!

> > can you please give the birth data so other factors can be seen.

> > as per your question if i had to answer without considering other

> > factors... i am optimistic.. i would say delayed marriage :).

> > remember Krushnaji said.. 50% of effect by planet rest by efforts of

> > person. and if there are blessing in chart or from up above..

> > thanks/regards

> > harjeet

> >

> > astrologyandtiminge

> > <%40>

> vents ,

> > " Anup. M "

> > <dalh_1@> wrote:

> > >

> > > Dear Harjeet ,

> > >

> > > " us shehar mein jao,to itna use kehna,

> > > baqi na sune koi, sirf tanha usay kehna,

> > > kuch log safar kay liye mozo'n (suitable) nahi hotay,

> > > kuch raaste kate nahi tanha,itna use kehna "

> > >

> > > Now tell me,how the quality of a marriage will be, if there is no

> > zero in SAV by any planet

> > > and three zero in navamsa :) and What about such case...denial or

> > delay of marriage??

> > >

> > > Regards

> > > Anup

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > > harjeet bakshi <harjeet_bakshi@> wrote:

> > > Dear Ashji,

> > > whenever one of my teacher used to give me smile.. i used to do

> > > something wrong in solving a problem... but she would not tell

me till

> > > i asked her.

> > > so did i do something wrong?

> > > thanks/regards

> > > harjeet

> > >

> > > astrologyandtiminge

> > <%40>

> vents ,

> > " ashsam73 " <kas@>

> > > wrote:

> > > >

> > > > Dear Harjeet,

> > > >

> > > > :-)

> > > >

> > > > Cheers !!!

> > > > Ash -> http://www.ashtro. <http://www.ashtro.ca> ca

> > > >

> > > > astrologyandtiminge

> > <%40>

> vents ,

> > " Ash " <kas@> wrote:

> > > > >

> > > > > Dear Harjeet,

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > > :-)

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > > Cheers !!!

> > > > >

> > > > > Ash -> <http://www.ashtro. <http://www.ashtro.ca> ca>

> > http://www.ashtro. <http://www.ashtro.ca> ca

> > > > >

> > > > > _____

> > > > >

> > > > > astrologyandtiminge

> > <%40>

> vents

> > > > > [astrologyandtiminge

> > <%40>

> vents ]

> > On Behalf Of

> > harjeet

> > > > > bakshi

> > > > > Thursday September 13, 2007 11:19 AM

> > > > > astrologyandtiminge

> > <%40>

> vents

> > > > > Re: Dear Ash et All :On the

> > > > Creation of

> > > > > Universe and Cosmology as applicable to

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > > Resp. Ashji,

> > > > > more over current antra of rahu samdhari to venus and mars.

> > > > > mars have more points for 12th compared to 11th.

> > > > > venus has 20 for 11th and 17 for 12th.

> > > > > rahu in 9th house triggers 12th and 4th house.

> > > > > so mars points in ws and rahu's position points to more

> > expenditure in

> > > > > current antra.

> > > > > moreover antras of mars,saturn,moon,mercury and sun have less

> points

> > > > > in worsheet for 11th house compared to 12th.

> > > > > only jupiter and venus have a just little more points in 11th

> > compared

> > > > > to 12th.

> > > > > plus the sav in 12th is more than 11th.

> > > > > dont we take mean of sav from sun,moon and lagna ?

> > > > > anything wrong in my thinking?

> > > > > thanks/regards

> > > > > harjeet

> > > > >

> > > > > astrologyandtiminge

> > > > > <%40>

> > > > vents (AT) (DOT) <vents%40> com,

> > > > > " Ash " <kas@> wrote:

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Dear Amit,

> > > > > >

> > > > > >

> > > > > >

> > > > > > With this data u have given,

> > > > > >

> > > > > >

> > > > > >

> > > > > > 19th May 1986

> > > > > >

> > > > > > 12:10 PM

> > > > > >

> > > > > > New Delhi

> > > > > >

> > > > > >

> > > > > >

> > > > > >

> > > > > >

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Planet

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Degrees

> > > > > >

> > > > > >

> > > > > > As

> > > > > >

> > > > > > 5 Le 38

> > > > > >

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Su

> > > > > >

> > > > > > 5 Ta 14

> > > > > >

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Mo

> > > > > >

> > > > > > 2 Vi 38

> > > > > >

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Ma

> > > > > >

> > > > > > 27 Sg 51

> > > > > >

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Me

> > > > > >

> > > > > > 0 Ta 39

> > > > > >

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Ju

> > > > > >

> > > > > > 25 Aq 40

> > > > > >

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Ve

> > > > > >

> > > > > > 4 Ge 28

> > > > > >

> > > > > >

> > > > > > SaR

> > > > > >

> > > > > > 14 Sc 17

> > > > > >

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Ra

> > > > > >

> > > > > > 5 Ar 44

> > > > > >

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Ke

> > > > > >

> > > > > > 5 Li 44

> > > > > >

> > > > > >

> > > > > >

> > > > > >

> > > > > >

> > > > > >

> > > > > >

> > > > > >

> > > > > > House

> > > > > >

> > > > > > 1

> > > > > >

> > > > > > 2

> > > > > >

> > > > > > 3

> > > > > >

> > > > > > 4

> > > > > >

> > > > > > 5

> > > > > >

> > > > > > 6

> > > > > >

> > > > > > 7

> > > > > >

> > > > > > 8

> > > > > >

> > > > > > 9

> > > > > >

> > > > > > 10

> > > > > >

> > > > > > 11

> > > > > >

> > > > > > 12

> > > > > >

> > > > > >

> > > > > >

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Sun

> > > > > >

> > > > >

> > > >

> > >

> >

>

<file:///C:\Documents%20and%20Settings\ENagawkar\Desktop\KASMaster.xls#BAV!T

> > > > > > 7#BAV!T7>

> > > > > >

> > > > > > 10

> > > > > >

> > > > > > 3

> > > > > >

> > > > > > 3

> > > > > >

> > > > > > 4

> > > > > >

> > > > > > 5

> > > > > >

> > > > > > 5

> > > > > >

> > > > > > 4

> > > > > >

> > > > > > 4

> > > > > >

> > > > > > 3

> > > > > >

> > > > > > 1

> > > > > >

> > > > > > 4

> > > > > >

> > > > > > 6

> > > > > >

> > > > > > 6

> > > > > >

> > > > > > 48

> > > > > >

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Moon

> > > > > >

> > > > >

> > > >

> > >

> >

>

<file:///C:\Documents%20and%20Settings\ENagawkar\Desktop\KASMaster.xls#BAV!A

> > > > > > J7#BAV!AJ7>

> > > > > >

> > > > > > 2

> > > > > >

> > > > > > 4

> > > > > >

> > > > > > 6

> > > > > >

> > > > > > 4

> > > > > >

> > > > > > 4

> > > > > >

> > > > > > 4

> > > > > >

> > > > > > 4

> > > > > >

> > > > > > 6

> > > > > >

> > > > > > 5

> > > > > >

> > > > > > 3

> > > > > >

> > > > > > 4

> > > > > >

> > > > > > 2

> > > > > >

> > > > > > 3

> > > > > >

> > > > > > 49

> > > > > >

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Mars

> > > > > >

> > > > >

> > > >

> > >

> >

>

<file:///C:\Documents%20and%20Settings\ENagawkar\Desktop\KASMaster.xls#BAV!D

> > > > > > 34#BAV!D34>

> > > > > >

> > > > > > 5

> > > > > >

> > > > > > 2

> > > > > >

> > > > > > 4

> > > > > >

> > > > > > 4

> > > > > >

> > > > > > 4

> > > > > >

> > > > > > 2

> > > > > >

> > > > > > 4

> > > > > >

> > > > > > 3

> > > > > >

> > > > > > 3

> > > > > >

> > > > > > 1

> > > > > >

> > > > > > 3

> > > > > >

> > > > > > 3

> > > > > >

> > > > > > 6

> > > > > >

> > > > > > 39

> > > > > >

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Mercury

> > > > > >

> > > > >

> > > >

> > >

> >

>

<file:///C:\Documents%20and%20Settings\ENagawkar\Desktop\KASMaster.xls#BAV!T

> > > > > > 34#BAV!T34>

> > > > > >

> > > > > > 10

> > > > > >

> > > > > > 4

> > > > > >

> > > > > > 7

> > > > > >

> > > > > > 5

> > > > > >

> > > > > > 2

> > > > > >

> > > > > > 4

> > > > > >

> > > > > > 6

> > > > > >

> > > > > > 4

> > > > > >

> > > > > > 4

> > > > > >

> > > > > > 4

> > > > > >

> > > > > > 3

> > > > > >

> > > > > > 5

> > > > > >

> > > > > > 6

> > > > > >

> > > > > > 54

> > > > > >

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Jupiter

> > > > > >

> > > > >

> > > >

> > >

> >

>

<file:///C:\Documents%20and%20Settings\ENagawkar\Desktop\KASMaster.xls#BAV!A

> > > > > > J34#BAV!AJ34>

> > > > > >

> > > > > > 7

> > > > > >

> > > > > > 4

> > > > > >

> > > > > > 4

> > > > > >

> > > > > > 5

> > > > > >

> > > > > > 4

> > > > > >

> > > > > > 4

> > > > > >

> > > > > > 6

> > > > > >

> > > > > > 5

> > > > > >

> > > > > > 7

> > > > > >

> > > > > > 4

> > > > > >

> > > > > > 5

> > > > > >

> > > > > > 4

> > > > > >

> > > > > > 4

> > > > > >

> > > > > > 56

> > > > > >

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Venus

> > > > > >

> > > > >

> > > >

> > >

> >

>

<file:///C:\Documents%20and%20Settings\ENagawkar\Desktop\KASMaster.xls#BAV!G

> > > > > > 61#BAV!G61>

> > > > > >

> > > > > > 11

> > > > > >

> > > > > > 5

> > > > > >

> > > > > > 6

> > > > > >

> > > > > > 6

> > > > > >

> > > > > > 4

> > > > > >

> > > > > > 4

> > > > > >

> > > > > > 4

> > > > > >

> > > > > > 3

> > > > > >

> > > > > > 5

> > > > > >

> > > > > > 5

> > > > > >

> > > > > > 2

> > > > > >

> > > > > > 4

> > > > > >

> > > > > > 4

> > > > > >

> > > > > > 52

> > > > > >

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Saturn

> > > > > >

> > > > >

> > > >

> > >

> >

>

<file:///C:\Documents%20and%20Settings\ENagawkar\Desktop\KASMaster.xls#BAV!T

> > > > > > 61#BAV!T61>

> > > > > >

> > > > > > 4

> > > > > >

> > > > > > 2

> > > > > >

> > > > > > 2

> > > > > >

> > > > > > 3

> > > > > >

> > > > > > 5

> > > > > >

> > > > > > 3

> > > > > >

> > > > > > 4

> > > > > >

> > > > > > 4

> > > > > >

> > > > > > 3

> > > > > >

> > > > > > 4

> > > > > >

> > > > > > 4

> > > > > >

> > > > > > 3

> > > > > >

> > > > > > 2

> > > > > >

> > > > > > 39

> > > > > >

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Totals

> > > > > >

> > > > > >

> > > > > >

> > > > > > 24

> > > > > >

> > > > > > 32

> > > > > >

> > > > > > 31

> > > > > >

> > > > > > 28

> > > > > >

> > > > > > 26

> > > > > >

> > > > > > 32

> > > > > >

> > > > > > 29

> > > > > >

> > > > > > 30

> > > > > >

> > > > > > 22

> > > > > >

> > > > > > 25

> > > > > >

> > > > > > 27

> > > > > >

> > > > > > 31

> > > > > >

> > > > > > 337

> > > > > >

> > > > > >

> > > > > >

> > > > > >

> > > > > >

> > > > > > The points in 12th are more than 11th.

> > > > > >

> > > > > >

> > > > > >

> > > > > > In any case, let it be.

> > > > > >

> > > > > >

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Cheers !!!

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Ash -> <http://www.ashtro. <http://www.ashtro.

> > <http://www.ashtro.ca> ca> ca>

> > > > http://www.ashtro.

> > > > > <http://www.ashtro. <http://www.ashtro.ca> ca> ca

> > > > > >

> > > > > > _____

> > > > > >

> > > > > > astrologyandtiminge

> > > > > <%40>

> > > > vents (AT) (DOT) <vents%40> com

> > > > > > [astrologyandtiminge

> > > > > <%40>

> > > > vents (AT) (DOT) <vents%40> com]

> > > > > On Behalf Of planck12

> > > > > > Wednesday September 12, 2007 7:58 PM

> > > > > > astrologyandtiminge

> > > > > <%40>

> > > > vents (AT) (DOT) <vents%40> com

> > > > > > Re: Dear Ash et All

:On the

> > > > > Creation of

> > > > > > Universe and Cosmology as applicable to

> > > > > >

> > > > > >

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Dear Ash,

> > > > > > Yes, I completely concur and thats all I wanted to clarify

> from my

> > > > > > end. Again before I leave I have another chart if anyone wants

> > > to use

> > > > > > from educational stand point.

> > > > > >

> > > > > > 19 May 1986

> > > > > > 12:10pm

> > > > > > new delhi.

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Again i decided to relate the 11/12th house points, in this

> chart

> > > > > > again the worksheet decided to give more points in 11th

> house than

> > > > > > 12th. But the girl has no savings, he is quite spendrift and

> have

> > > > > > numerous expenses as compared to her income.

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Also to double check other things, i decided to check other

> > factors,

> > > > > > her brillancy for that matter. I think she has two parts in

> saturn

> > > > > > degrees as shown with the work sheet. But she is not very

> > > intelligent,

> > > > > > again a decent girl who is quite jovial, but she has done a

> > > > > > certificate course and works in a local bank. As I

understand it

> > > from

> > > > > > the notes if one part is in saturn then person has odinary

> > > > > > intelligence and if two he/she has good intelligence. In her

> > > case she

> > > > > > is normal like anyone else who has no part in saturns

division.

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Feel free to check, incase there are other things required,

> as is

> > > > > > always the case in terms of details.

> > > > > >

> > > > > > 1. The girl is unmarried

> > > > > > 2. Wheatish complexion

> > > > > > 3. works in a bank as teller

> > > > > > 4. From a middle class family

> > > > > > 5. Has good morals, but tends to be energetic and hyper at

> times

> > > > > >

> > > > > > regards

> > > > > > Nicked Vish (Amit) I prefer Vish

> > > > > >

> > > > > > astrologyandtiminge

> > > > > > <%40>

> > > > > vents (AT) (DOT) <vents%40> com,

> > > > > > " Ash " <kas@> wrote:

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > Dear Amit / Vishy (?),

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > Everyone is entitled to their own opinion and All the more

> > > reason we

> > > > > > should

> > > > > > > get back to KAS :-)

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > Cheers !!!

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > Ash -> <http://www.ashtro. <http://www.ashtro.

> > > > <http://www.ashtro. <http://www.ashtro.ca> ca>

> > > > > ca> ca>

> > > > > http://www.ashtro.

> > > > > > <http://www.ashtro. <http://www.ashtro.

> <http://www.ashtro.ca> ca>

> > ca> ca

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > _____

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > astrologyandtiminge

> > > > > > <%40>

> > > > > vents (AT) (DOT) <vents%40> com

> > > > > > > [astrologyandtiminge

> > > > > > <%40>

> > > > > vents (AT) (DOT) <vents%40> com]

> > > > > > On Behalf Of

> > > > > > astroquery12

> > > > > > > Wednesday September 12, 2007 7:11 PM

> > > > > > > astrologyandtiminge

> > > > > > <%40>

> > > > > vents (AT) (DOT) <vents%40> com

> > > > > > > Dear Ash et All :On the

> > > > > Creation of

> > > > > > > Universe and Cosmology as applicable to Astr

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > Hi,

> > > > > > > Hope you are doing well. This is Amit again, had posted

> under a

> > > > > > > different name prior but that account did not seem to

work and

> > > > had to

> > > > > > > create a new id.

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > I have been following the lessons for a while and again I

> > see many

> > > > > > > in-consistencies with the system. My intention is not to

> > refute or

> > > > > > > accept the system but purely to learn it and see it

> > > practicality and

> > > > > > > in the process provide my thoughts in opinions (after

all the

> > > > > > > astrology forum is a free form for discussion). Some of my

> > > > doubts have

> > > > > > > cropped up again with the usual, 11th house points vs 12th

> house

> > > > > > > points and the actual condition of the charts (again this is

> > only

> > > > > > > treating the chart with KAS)as opposed to mixing parashra

> or k.p

> > > > etc.

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > On another note, perhaps I can take the liberty to explain

> > > again on

> > > > > > > why this happens and hopefully you concur with my points and

> > > facts.

> > > > > > > After all astrology will make more meaning if we

understand it

> > > from

> > > > > > > all angles. You are a computer scientist (a man of science)

> > > yourself

> > > > > > > and perhaps this description will make sense and will take a

> > > purely

> > > > > > > scientific approach to it:

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > I am sure you are familiar at least on the basic level with

> > > > Einstein's

> > > > > > > relativity and the other theory called Quantum Mechanics.

> > > During the

> > > > > > > creation of the universe at the point of big bang it is

widely

> > > > > > > believed that there were four fundamental forces in the

> > universe:

> > > > > > > Gravity, electromagnetic, weak nuclear and strong nuclear.

> It is

> > > > also

> > > > > > > now very well accepted that relativity explains Gravity very

> > > > elegantly

> > > > > > > and that the theory has been tested to the point of

> calculations

> > > > > > > pertaning to perhilion of mercury (closest pass to the

> sun) with

> > > > > > > accuracy. On the other hand Quantum mechanics has done

well in

> > > > > > > unifying the other three forces of the electromagnetic and

> > nuclear

> > > > > > > nature. BUT a BIG TWIST comes into the picture.

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > Realivity claims that events (spacetime continum is 4D)

> are all

> > > > > > > associated together and there is no concept of past and

> > future or

> > > > > > > present and in simple terms the destiney is already

> written and

> > > > > > > nothing can change it, so given the right set of laws

one can

> > > > predict

> > > > > > > the course of life and the cosmos (relativistic

conditions on

> > > > > > > cosmology)to a complete accurate picture based on fundametal

> > field

> > > > > > > equations of einstein. Again Einstein spent much of his life

> > > > finding a

> > > > > > > Unified theory that would unify electromagnetics with

> > gravity BUT

> > > > > > FAILED.

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > On the other hand QUANTUM MECHANICS claims that nothing in

> > life is

> > > > > > > predictable infact everything is a probability. And QM

> explains

> > > > atoms

> > > > > > > etc the world of sub atomic very well (this would

include the

> > > brain)

> > > > > > > the body etc, after all brain is essential a complex neural

> > > network

> > > > > > > working on neurotransmitters signals which are electrical in

> > > > nature.

> > > > > > > So it is quite justified that QM is applicable to us as well

> > > > since we

> > > > > > > are made of atoms, eletrons etc. But the problem you run

into

> > > > with QM

> > > > > > > is that nothing is certain and that everything is

> described as a

> > > > > > > probablity wave function of something called the

> scrhorodingers

> > > > > > > equation. I would want you to refer to the thought

experiment

> > > termed

> > > > > > > " Schroender's Cat " which is hard for me to explain on this

> fourm

> > > > but I

> > > > > > > am sure you will take the initiative of reading it, in short

> > every

> > > > > > > observation made my an reference observer will change the

> > > course of

> > > > > > > this obervation directly or indirectly depending on the

> > > observation

> > > > > > > being made. Simply put, there is too much random ness

existent

> > > > in this

> > > > > > > universe to be able to describe anything in any accruancy,

> > > > especially

> > > > > > > when it comes to life or the atomic scale.

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > Now applying the above theories to describe astrology, many

> > of the

> > > > > > > General predictions we make about the past or even the

> future at

> > > > times

> > > > > > > happen to come true, yet there are many more predictions

> we made

> > > > that

> > > > > > > do not come true at all. Because we are juggling between

> > > certainity

> > > > > > > and chaos and that is not the fault or positive aspect of

> anyone

> > > > > > > astrological system but rather the law of nature (God if

> you may

> > > > call

> > > > > > > it). You have claimed in your past emails that KAS is very

> > > accurate

> > > > > > > however on my sincere application of these principles I have

> > > > found it

> > > > > > > smiliar to any other system because the rate of predicition

> > > does not

> > > > > > > change much as compared to prashara or k.p or jaimini

for that

> > > > > matter.

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > It is however a different story if we only look at the

> positive

> > > > aspect

> > > > > > > and not realise the shortcomings of any system. My

approach is

> > > > to look

> > > > > > > at the short comings of this system simply because it

> might help

> > > > > > > improve the system in some other way (again thats not

job). My

> > > sole

> > > > > > > intention for this posting has been to again reiterate on a

> > > > scientific

> > > > > > > ground the limitations of astrology and that of human

mind and

> > > > that no

> > > > > > > matter how hard we try we will be bound by many

> contraints. You

> > > > might

> > > > > > > claim that KAS predictions have come true, but I have

applied

> > > basic

> > > > > > > principles of many charts some of which have yielded

> results but

> > > > again

> > > > > > > some of them have not yielded the correct results (this

I see

> > > > with an

> > > > > > > open mind) leading me to believe and again affirm with the

> > > view that

> > > > > > > astrology has limitations on what can be predicted. Any when

> > > we are

> > > > > > > bound by such limitations then ethically we should take

a more

> > > > > > > cautious approach in predicting in the first place and

> perhaps a

> > > > more

> > > > > > > understanding, less materialistic (making money out of

> > astrology)

> > > > > > > attitude in researching things. This would also involve

being

> > > > open to

> > > > > > > genuine thoughts weather pro or against any system in the

> > > betterment

> > > > > > > of knowledge.

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > To end it Einstein once said " God does not play dice

with the

> > > > > > > Universe " on seeing Quatum Mechanics back in the 30s he was

> > > > > > > diasspointed with QM because he felt there was no free will

> > > and that

> > > > > > > there was no such thing as probablity. A famous Quautum

> > > Theorist (I

> > > > > > > will let you figure out who) responded by saying " Not only

> > > does God

> > > > > > > play dice with Us, He also puts it in places where we cannot

> > find

> > > > > it " .

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > :) I hope you see this message not as a threat to your

> > system but

> > > > > > > rather as an open ended question to ponder on keeping aside

> > > > > > > ego,predjuice or any other negative emotions.

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > regards and Best

> > > > > > > Amit

> > > > > > >

> > > > > >

> > > > >

> > > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > > Be a better Heartthrob. Get better relationship answers from someone

> > who knows.

> > > Answers - Check it out.

> > >

>

> Be a better Heartthrob. Get better relationship answers from

someone who knows.

> Answers - Check it out.

>

>

>

>

>

>

> Fussy? Opinionated? Impossible to please? Perfect. Join 's

user panel and lay it on us.

>

>

>

>

>

>

> 5, 50, 500, 5000 - Store N number of mails in your inbox. Click

here.

>

>

>

>

>

> Tonight's top picks. What will you watch tonight? Preview the

hottest shows on TV.

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...