Guest guest Posted November 6, 2007 Report Share Posted November 6, 2007 Dear Friends, I have a chart of female , who says her TOB is correct. I am not getting her time of marriage right. Female 24 April, 1974 , 17.50 , Surat , 21N10, 72 E50. India She say she got married on 15 Feb, 1994 in Rahu / Rahu . How ? She says she has good married life . Other events are joined new job 4 dec 2001 - Ra/Me Went to USA : June 2004 , Ra/Ve Left Job : July 2007 -- Ra/Su Blessed with Daughter : 16 Jan, 2000 -- Ra/Sat Pls help. Regards & Thanks, Raj Rajesh Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 6, 2007 Report Share Posted November 6, 2007 Dear Rajesh, yes the birth time doesnt seem to be accurate. according to time given sa goes to 5th house in navamsa and no blessings. changing the time to 18:10 we get libra asc. still we get full delay by saturn and no blessings. changing the time to 17:35 we get saturn out of 5th navamsa so there is no delay.. so marriage can happen in rahu antra but again it shouldnt be a happy marriage as rahu is sd to mars and mercury having very less points for 7th and 2nd house. rahu is more like mars which is having very low points for 5th and 12th house. but mercury which is giving zero points for the house its in... would be very weak samdhari is giving good points for 5th and 12th house. is it a love marriage ? next antra of jupiter the points increase and is lord of D so some hiccups in marriage ? other events do match more or less. thanks/regards harjeet , Raj Rajesh <astro_raj9 wrote: > > Dear Friends, > I have a chart of female , who says her TOB is correct. I am not getting her time of marriage right. > Female > 24 April, 1974 , 17.50 , Surat , 21N10, 72 E50. India > She say she got married on 15 Feb, 1994 in Rahu / Rahu . How ? She says she has good married life . > Other events are > joined new job 4 dec 2001 - Ra/Me > Went to USA : June 2004 , Ra/Ve > Left Job : July 2007 -- Ra/Su > Blessed with Daughter : 16 Jan, 2000 -- Ra/Sat > > Pls help. > > Regards & Thanks, > Raj Rajesh > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 6, 2007 Report Share Posted November 6, 2007 Dear Rajesh, This chart opens up a few question. 1. Guru aspects shani so can check shani delay if present. However Guru is in shani sign kumbha so can not check delay according to rules. I alos notice that guru is varagottma, i.e in kumbha in navansh as well. IS there a special rule for a varagottama planet? 2. Yes in KAS shani in 5th house in navansha is taken for delay. Everything else in navansha is used for lords from rashi chart. Except in case of shani in 5th house. Nowhere else we take houses in navansha. 3. If we take there is no delay due to shani. Guru is aspecting A and is owner of B. However guru has more than 4 points in B so Guru delay is ruled out. 4. So assuming no delay. Why rahu-rahu ? Yes rahu is samadharmi ti Mangal and budh and mangal is samadharmi to guru who is LoD. But thats a long chain. Guru sub is availale in 1995 so why rahu stepped in for guru. He can step in for mangal or budh. Check again, may be she got married in 1995 in rahu-guru. The rest of the events seem to work with the given data. Satish --- Raj Rajesh <astro_raj9 wrote: > Dear Friends, > I have a chart of female , who says her TOB is > correct. I am not getting her time of marriage > right. > Female > 24 April, 1974 , 17.50 , Surat , 21N10, 72 E50. > India > She say she got married on 15 Feb, 1994 in Rahu / > Rahu . How ? She says she has good married life . > Other events are > joined new job 4 dec 2001 - Ra/Me > Went to USA : June 2004 , Ra/Ve > Left Job : July 2007 -- Ra/Su > Blessed with Daughter : 16 Jan, 2000 -- Ra/Sat > > Pls help. > > Regards & Thanks, > Raj Rajesh > > > > Tired of spam? Mail has the best spam > protection around > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 6, 2007 Report Share Posted November 6, 2007 Dear Raj, It is a very interesting chart. I am getting the following positions with time taken as 17:54 (Given time + 4mins) for nullifying sa delay since marriage is very early: AV Deg as 26vir54 su 3 11ari20 mo 3 08tau05 ma 5 09gem52 me 5 00ari11 Ju 4 17aqu29 ve 5 26aqu04 sa 2 07gem52 ra 29sco18 ke 29tau18 Me, Ra and Ke are right on the verge of changing signs. Me is in starting degrees of aries. There are 2 zeroes in the chart, in 3rd house due to me and in 9th house due to ma. I agree with you that this current chart cannot give happy married life. NK and FK ve is in 6th house with ju lord of B. Nevertheless the chart is interesting. Can you please find the following for me from the native: Why did the native leave her job? Did she encounter a problem from her superiors or friends? Is she very slim? Was she working in the medical field or studied in that area? Thanks & Regards, Manu On Behalf Of Raj Rajesh Tuesday, November 06, 2007 5:30 PM astrology group Subject: Accuracy of the Chart Dear Friends, I have a chart of female , who says her TOB is correct. I am not getting her time of marriage right. Female 24 April, 1974 , 17.50 , Surat , 21N10, 72 E50. India She say she got married on 15 Feb, 1994 in Rahu / Rahu . How ? She says she has good married life . Other events are joined new job 4 dec 2001 - Ra/Me Went to USA : June 2004 , Ra/Ve Left Job : July 2007 -- Ra/Su Blessed with Daughter : 16 Jan, 2000 -- Ra/Sat Pls help. Regards & Thanks, Raj Rajesh Internal Virus Database is out-of-date. Version: 7.5.503 / Virus Database: 269.15.12/1097 - Release 10/28/2007 1:58 PM Internal Virus Database is out-of-date. Version: 7.5.503 / Virus Database: 269.15.12/1097 - Release 10/28/2007 1:58 PM Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 6, 2007 Report Share Posted November 6, 2007 One thing I forgot to mention. Sun-shukra distance is >43. I don't think this would cause delay but should be taken into account in quality of marriage. What were the circumstances of marriage. 19 years seems a bit early. --- SPK <aquaris_rising wrote: > Dear Rajesh, > This chart opens up a few question. > > 1. Guru aspects shani so can check shani delay if > present. However Guru is in shani sign kumbha so can > not check delay according to rules. I alos notice > that > guru is varagottma, i.e in kumbha in navansh as > well. > IS there a special rule for a varagottama planet? > > 2. Yes in KAS shani in 5th house in navansha is > taken > for delay. Everything else in navansha is used for > lords from rashi chart. Except in case of shani in > 5th > house. Nowhere else we take houses in navansha. > > 3. If we take there is no delay due to shani. Guru > is > aspecting A and is owner of B. However guru has more > than 4 points in B so Guru delay is ruled out. > > 4. So assuming no delay. Why rahu-rahu ? Yes rahu is > samadharmi ti Mangal and budh and mangal is > samadharmi > to guru who is LoD. But thats a long chain. Guru sub > is availale in 1995 so why rahu stepped in for guru. > He can step in for mangal or budh. Check again, may > be > she got married in 1995 in rahu-guru. The rest of > the > events seem to work with the given data. > > Satish > --- Raj Rajesh <astro_raj9 wrote: > > > Dear Friends, > > I have a chart of female , who says her TOB is > > correct. I am not getting her time of marriage > > right. > > Female > > 24 April, 1974 , 17.50 , Surat , 21N10, 72 E50. > > India > > She say she got married on 15 Feb, 1994 in Rahu / > > Rahu . How ? She says she has good married life . > > Other events are > > joined new job 4 dec 2001 - Ra/Me > > Went to USA : June 2004 , Ra/Ve > > Left Job : July 2007 -- Ra/Su > > Blessed with Daughter : 16 Jan, 2000 -- Ra/Sat > > > > Pls help. > > > > Regards & Thanks, > > Raj Rajesh > > > > > > > > Tired of spam? Mail has the best spam > > protection around > > > > > > > Tired of spam? Mail has the best spam > protection around > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 6, 2007 Report Share Posted November 6, 2007 Dear Harjeet, I fully agrre with you . She is saying there is no major problem in her married life. I have insisted again to confirm her details. So lets see what she says. I will keep you guys posted. Thanks Harjeet, very much. Regards, Raj Rajeshharjeet bakshi <harjeet_bakshi wrote: Dear Rajesh,yes the birth time doesnt seem to be accurate.according to time given sa goes to 5th house in navamsa and no blessings.changing the time to 18:10 we get libra asc. still we get full delayby saturn and no blessings.changing the time to 17:35 we get saturn out of 5th navamsa so thereis no delay.. so marriage can happen in rahu antra but again itshouldnt be a happy marriage as rahu is sd to mars and mercury havingvery less points for 7th and 2nd house. rahu is more like mars whichis having very low points for 5th and 12th house. but mercury which isgiving zero points for the house its in... would be very weak samdhariis giving good points for 5th and 12th house.is it a love marriage ?next antra of jupiter the points increase and is lord of D so somehiccups in marriage ?other events do match more or less.thanks/regardsharjeet , Raj Rajesh<astro_raj9 wrote:>> Dear Friends,> I have a chart of female , who says her TOB is correct. I am notgetting her time of marriage right.> Female> 24 April, 1974 , 17.50 , Surat , 21N10, 72 E50. India> She say she got married on 15 Feb, 1994 in Rahu / Rahu . How ? Shesays she has good married life .> Other events are> joined new job 4 dec 2001 - Ra/Me> Went to USA : June 2004 , Ra/Ve> Left Job : July 2007 -- Ra/Su> Blessed with Daughter : 16 Jan, 2000 -- Ra/Sat> > Pls help.> > Regards & Thanks,> Raj Rajesh> > > > > > Do You ? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 6, 2007 Report Share Posted November 6, 2007 Dear Manu, Yes, You are right , She left the job because of the politics at work place. She is not very slim. I will confirm about the medical field. Thanks Manu, Very much. Regards, Raj Rajesh Manu V Batura <astro.manu wrote: Dear Raj, It is a very interesting chart. I am getting the following positions with time taken as 17:54 (Given time + 4mins) for nullifying sa delay since marriage is very early: AV Deg as 26vir54 su 3 11ari20 mo 3 08tau05 ma 5 09gem52 me 5 00ari11 Ju 4 17aqu29 ve 5 26aqu04 sa 2 07gem52 ra 29sco18 ke 29tau18 Me, Ra and Ke are right on the verge of changing signs. Me is in starting degrees of aries. There are 2 zeroes in the chart, in 3rd house due to me and in 9th house due to ma. I agree with you that this current chart cannot give happy married life. NK and FK ve is in 6th house with ju lord of B. Nevertheless the chart is interesting. Can you please find the following for me from the native: Why did the native leave her job? Did she encounter a problem from her superiors or friends? Is she very slim? Was she working in the medical field or studied in that area? Thanks & Regards, Manu On Behalf Of Raj RajeshTuesday, November 06, 2007 5:30 PMastrology group Accuracy of the Chart Dear Friends, I have a chart of female , who says her TOB is correct. I am not getting her time of marriage right. Female 24 April, 1974 , 17.50 , Surat , 21N10, 72 E50. India She say she got married on 15 Feb, 1994 in Rahu / Rahu . How ? She says she has good married life . Other events are joined new job 4 dec 2001 - Ra/Me Went to USA : June 2004 , Ra/Ve Left Job : July 2007 -- Ra/Su Blessed with Daughter : 16 Jan, 2000 -- Ra/Sat Pls help. Regards & Thanks, Raj Rajesh Internal Virus Database is out-of-date.Version: 7.5.503 / Virus Database: 269.15.12/1097 - Release 10/28/2007 1:58 PM Internal Virus Database is out-of-date.Version: 7.5.503 / Virus Database: 269.15.12/1097 - Release 10/28/2007 1:58 PM Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 6, 2007 Report Share Posted November 6, 2007 Dear Satish, I am trying t find more info. I will keep you updated. Thanks Satish, very much, Regards, Raj RajeshSPK <aquaris_rising wrote: One thing I forgot to mention. Sun-shukra distance is>43. I don't think this would cause delay but shouldbe taken into account in quality of marriage. Whatwere the circumstances of marriage. 19 years seems abit early.--- SPK <aquaris_rising > wrote:> Dear Rajesh,> This chart opens up a few question.> > 1. Guru aspects shani so can check shani delay if> present. However Guru is in shani sign kumbha so can> not check delay according to rules. I alos notice> that> guru is varagottma, i.e in kumbha in navansh as> well.> IS there a special rule for a varagottama planet?> > 2. Yes in KAS shani in 5th house in navansha is> taken> for delay. Everything else in navansha is used for> lords from rashi chart. Except in case of shani in> 5th> house. Nowhere else we take houses in navansha. > > 3. If we take there is no delay due to shani. Guru> is> aspecting A and is owner of B. However guru has more> than 4 points in B so Guru delay is ruled out.> > 4. So assuming no delay. Why rahu-rahu ? Yes rahu is> samadharmi ti Mangal and budh and mangal is> samadharmi> to guru who is LoD. But thats a long chain. Guru sub> is availale in 1995 so why rahu stepped in for guru.> He can step in for mangal or budh. Check again, may> be> she got married in 1995 in rahu-guru. The rest of> the> events seem to work with the given data.> > Satish> --- Raj Rajesh <astro_raj9 > wrote:> > > Dear Friends,> > I have a chart of female , who says her TOB is> > correct. I am not getting her time of marriage> > right.> > Female> > 24 April, 1974 , 17.50 , Surat , 21N10, 72 E50.> > India> > She say she got married on 15 Feb, 1994 in Rahu /> > Rahu . How ? She says she has good married life .> > Other events are> > joined new job 4 dec 2001 - Ra/Me> > Went to USA : June 2004 , Ra/Ve> > Left Job : July 2007 -- Ra/Su> > Blessed with Daughter : 16 Jan, 2000 -- Ra/Sat> > > > Pls help.> > > > Regards & Thanks,> > Raj Rajesh> > > > > > > > Tired of spam? Mail has the best spam> > protection around > > > > > > > Tired of spam? Mail has the best spam> protection around > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 7, 2007 Report Share Posted November 7, 2007 to do the analysis which worksheet should one use? the worksheet in the files category says that the worksheet should be used for pre 1900 numbers. can i use the same sheet? Sonia Raj Rajesh <astro_raj9 wrote: Dear Satish, I am trying t find more info. I will keep you updated. Thanks Satish, very much, Regards, Raj RajeshSPK <aquaris_rising > wrote: One thing I forgot to mention. Sun-shukra distance is>43. I don't think this would cause delay but shouldbe taken into account in quality of marriage. Whatwere the circumstances of marriage. 19 years seems abit early.--- SPK <aquaris_rising > wrote:> Dear Rajesh,> This chart opens up a few question.> > 1. Guru aspects shani so can check shani delay if> present. However Guru is in shani sign kumbha so can> not check delay according to rules. I alos notice> that> guru is varagottma, i.e in kumbha in navansh as> well.> IS there a special rule for a varagottama planet?> > 2. Yes in KAS shani in 5th house in navansha is> taken> for delay. Everything else in navansha is used for> lords from rashi chart. Except in case of shani in> 5th> house. Nowhere else we take houses in navansha. > > 3. If we take there is no delay due to shani. Guru> is> aspecting A and is owner of B. However guru has more> than 4 points in B so Guru delay is ruled out.> > 4. So assuming no delay. Why rahu-rahu ? Yes rahu is> samadharmi ti Mangal and budh and mangal is> samadharmi> to guru who is LoD. But thats a long chain. Guru sub> is availale in 1995 so why rahu stepped in for guru.> He can step in for mangal or budh. Check again, may> be> she got married in 1995 in rahu-guru. The rest of> the> events seem to work with the given data.> > Satish> --- Raj Rajesh <astro_raj9 > wrote:> > > Dear Friends,> > I have a chart of female , who says her TOB is> > correct. I am not getting her time of marriage> > right.> > Female> > 24 April, 1974 , 17.50 , Surat , 21N10, 72 E50.> > India> > She say she got married on 15 Feb, 1994 in Rahu /> > Rahu . How ? She says she has good married life .> > Other events are> > joined new job 4 dec 2001 - Ra/Me> > Went to USA : June 2004 , Ra/Ve> > Left Job : July 2007 -- Ra/Su> > Blessed with Daughter : 16 Jan, 2000 -- Ra/Sat> > > > Pls help.> > > > Regards & Thanks,> > Raj Rajesh> > > > > > > > Tired of spam? Mail has the best spam> > protection around > > > > > > Do You ?> Tired of spam? Mail has the best spam> protection around > > Tired of spam? Mail has the best spam protection around Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 7, 2007 Report Share Posted November 7, 2007 Dear Sonia, You can download the latest worksheet from Donna's website at: http://krushna.sageasita.com Thanks & Regards, Manu , Sonia Kumar <sonia_kumar1002 wrote: > > to do the analysis which worksheet should one use? the worksheet in the files category says that the worksheet should be used for pre 1900 numbers. can i use the same sheet? > Sonia > > Raj Rajesh <astro_raj9 wrote: > Dear Satish, > I am trying t find more info. I will keep you updated. > Thanks Satish, very much, > Regards, > Raj Rajesh > > SPK <aquaris_rising wrote: > One thing I forgot to mention. Sun-shukra distance is > >43. I don't think this would cause delay but should > be taken into account in quality of marriage. What > were the circumstances of marriage. 19 years seems a > bit early. > --- SPK <aquaris_rising wrote: > > > Dear Rajesh, > > This chart opens up a few question. > > > > 1. Guru aspects shani so can check shani delay if > > present. However Guru is in shani sign kumbha so can > > not check delay according to rules. I alos notice > > that > > guru is varagottma, i.e in kumbha in navansh as > > well. > > IS there a special rule for a varagottama planet? > > > > 2. Yes in KAS shani in 5th house in navansha is > > taken > > for delay. Everything else in navansha is used for > > lords from rashi chart. Except in case of shani in > > 5th > > house. Nowhere else we take houses in navansha. > > > > 3. If we take there is no delay due to shani. Guru > > is > > aspecting A and is owner of B. However guru has more > > than 4 points in B so Guru delay is ruled out. > > > > 4. So assuming no delay. Why rahu-rahu ? Yes rahu is > > samadharmi ti Mangal and budh and mangal is > > samadharmi > > to guru who is LoD. But thats a long chain. Guru sub > > is availale in 1995 so why rahu stepped in for guru. > > He can step in for mangal or budh. Check again, may > > be > > she got married in 1995 in rahu-guru. The rest of > > the > > events seem to work with the given data. > > > > Satish > > --- Raj Rajesh <astro_raj9 wrote: > > > > > Dear Friends, > > > I have a chart of female , who says her TOB is > > > correct. I am not getting her time of marriage > > > right. > > > Female > > > 24 April, 1974 , 17.50 , Surat , 21N10, 72 E50. > > > India > > > She say she got married on 15 Feb, 1994 in Rahu / > > > Rahu . How ? She says she has good married life . > > > Other events are > > > joined new job 4 dec 2001 - Ra/Me > > > Went to USA : June 2004 , Ra/Ve > > > Left Job : July 2007 -- Ra/Su > > > Blessed with Daughter : 16 Jan, 2000 -- Ra/Sat > > > > > > Pls help. > > > > > > Regards & Thanks, > > > Raj Rajesh > > > > > > > > > > > > Tired of spam? Mail has the best spam > > > protection around > > > > > > > > > > > > > Tired of spam? Mail has the best spam > > protection around > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 12, 2007 Report Share Posted November 12, 2007 Dear Friends, I checked with the native. She confirmed about the data. Satish , her time of marriage is 15 Feb,1994 , Ra / Ra . Manu , yes she left job because of the co-workers. Now about the medical field, She started studying medical but left it in between because of the injury in Knee. She is not slim. Manu , How did you find out about the medical thing ??? This is the info I have so far. Thanks Guys, Regards, Raj RajeshManu V Batura <astro.manu wrote: Dear Raj, It is a very interesting chart. I am getting the following positions with time taken as 17:54 (Given time + 4mins) for nullifying sa delay since marriage is very early: AV Deg as 26vir54 su 3 11ari20 mo 3 08tau05 ma 5 09gem52 me 5 00ari11 Ju 4 17aqu29 ve 5 26aqu04 sa 2 07gem52 ra 29sco18 ke 29tau18 Me, Ra and Ke are right on the verge of changing signs. Me is in starting degrees of aries. There are 2 zeroes in the chart, in 3rd house due to me and in 9th house due to ma. I agree with you that this current chart cannot give happy married life. NK and FK ve is in 6th house with ju lord of B. Nevertheless the chart is interesting. Can you please find the following for me from the native: Why did the native leave her job? Did she encounter a problem from her superiors or friends? Is she very slim? Was she working in the medical field or studied in that area? Thanks & Regards, Manu On Behalf Of Raj RajeshTuesday, November 06, 2007 5:30 PMastrology group Accuracy of the Chart Dear Friends, I have a chart of female , who says her TOB is correct. I am not getting her time of marriage right. Female 24 April, 1974 , 17.50 , Surat , 21N10, 72 E50. India She say she got married on 15 Feb, 1994 in Rahu / Rahu . How ? She says she has good married life . Other events are joined new job 4 dec 2001 - Ra/Me Went to USA : June 2004 , Ra/Ve Left Job : July 2007 -- Ra/Su Blessed with Daughter : 16 Jan, 2000 -- Ra/Sat Pls help. Regards & Thanks, Raj Rajesh Internal Virus Database is out-of-date.Version: 7.5.503 / Virus Database: 269.15.12/1097 - Release 10/28/2007 1:58 PM Internal Virus Database is out-of-date.Version: 7.5.503 / Virus Database: 269.15.12/1097 - Release 10/28/2007 1:58 PM Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 12, 2007 Report Share Posted November 12, 2007 Dear Rajesh, Make an attempt, and Manu can guide u on the approach. You have the lesson on Occupation so start with that and give it a try. Cheers !!! Ash -> http://www.ashtro.ca On Behalf Of Raj Rajesh Monday November 12, 2007 9:39 AM RE: Accuracy of the Chart Dear Friends, I checked with the native. She confirmed about the data. Satish , her time of marriage is 15 Feb,1994 , Ra / Ra . Manu , yes she left job because of the co-workers. Now about the medical field, She started studying medical but left it in between because of the injury in Knee. She is not slim. Manu , How did you find out about the medical thing ??? This is the info I have so far. Thanks Guys, Regards, Raj Rajesh Manu V Batura <astro.manu > wrote: Dear Raj, It is a very interesting chart. I am getting the following positions with time taken as 17:54 (Given time + 4mins) for nullifying sa delay since marriage is very early: AV Deg as 26vir54 su 3 11ari20 mo 3 08tau05 ma 5 09gem52 me 5 00ari11 Ju 4 17aqu29 ve 5 26aqu04 sa 2 07gem52 ra 29sco18 ke 29tau18 Me, Ra and Ke are right on the verge of changing signs. Me is in starting degrees of aries. There are 2 zeroes in the chart, in 3rd house due to me and in 9th house due to ma. I agree with you that this current chart cannot give happy married life. NK and FK ve is in 6th house with ju lord of B. Nevertheless the chart is interesting. Can you please find the following for me from the native: Why did the native leave her job? Did she encounter a problem from her superiors or friends? Is she very slim? Was she working in the medical field or studied in that area? Thanks & Regards, Manu size=2 width="100%" align=center tabIndex=-1> On Behalf Of Raj Rajesh Tuesday, November 06, 2007 5:30 PM astrology group Accuracy of the Chart Dear Friends, I have a chart of female , who says her TOB is correct. I am not getting her time of marriage right. Female 24 April, 1974 , 17.50 , Surat , 21N10, 72 E50. India She say she got married on 15 Feb, 1994 in Rahu / Rahu . How ? She says she has good married life . Other events are joined new job 4 dec 2001 - Ra/Me Went to USA : June 2004 , Ra/Ve Left Job : July 2007 -- Ra/Su Blessed with Daughter : 16 Jan, 2000 -- Ra/Sat Pls help. Regards & Thanks, Raj Rajesh Internal Virus Database is out-of-date. Version: 7.5.503 / Virus Database: 269.15.12/1097 - Release 10/28/2007 1:58 PM Internal Virus Database is out-of-date. Version: 7.5.503 / Virus Database: 269.15.12/1097 - Release 10/28/2007 1:58 PM Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 12, 2007 Report Share Posted November 12, 2007 Dear Manu, Good analysis. Guide Raj and others who want to learn on the approach. And Congratz on fantastic attempt. Practice will make u perfect. Cheers !!! Ash -> http://www.ashtro.ca On Behalf Of Raj Rajesh Monday November 12, 2007 9:39 AM RE: Accuracy of the Chart Dear Friends, I checked with the native. She confirmed about the data. Satish , her time of marriage is 15 Feb,1994 , Ra / Ra . Manu , yes she left job because of the co-workers. Now about the medical field, She started studying medical but left it in between because of the injury in Knee. She is not slim. Manu , How did you find out about the medical thing ??? This is the info I have so far. Thanks Guys, Regards, Raj Rajesh Manu V Batura <astro.manu > wrote: Dear Raj, It is a very interesting chart. I am getting the following positions with time taken as 17:54 (Given time + 4mins) for nullifying sa delay since marriage is very early: AV Deg as 26vir54 su 3 11ari20 mo 3 08tau05 ma 5 09gem52 me 5 00ari11 Ju 4 17aqu29 ve 5 26aqu04 sa 2 07gem52 ra 29sco18 ke 29tau18 Me, Ra and Ke are right on the verge of changing signs. Me is in starting degrees of aries. There are 2 zeroes in the chart, in 3rd house due to me and in 9th house due to ma. I agree with you that this current chart cannot give happy married life. NK and FK ve is in 6th house with ju lord of B. Nevertheless the chart is interesting. Can you please find the following for me from the native: Why did the native leave her job? Did she encounter a problem from her superiors or friends? Is she very slim? Was she working in the medical field or studied in that area? Thanks & Regards, Manu size=2 width="100%" align=center tabIndex=-1> On Behalf Of Raj Rajesh Tuesday, November 06, 2007 5:30 PM astrology group Accuracy of the Chart Dear Friends, I have a chart of female , who says her TOB is correct. I am not getting her time of marriage right. Female 24 April, 1974 , 17.50 , Surat , 21N10, 72 E50. India She say she got married on 15 Feb, 1994 in Rahu / Rahu . How ? She says she has good married life . Other events are joined new job 4 dec 2001 - Ra/Me Went to USA : June 2004 , Ra/Ve Left Job : July 2007 -- Ra/Su Blessed with Daughter : 16 Jan, 2000 -- Ra/Sat Pls help. Regards & Thanks, Raj Rajesh Internal Virus Database is out-of-date. Version: 7.5.503 / Virus Database: 269.15.12/1097 - Release 10/28/2007 1:58 PM Internal Virus Database is out-of-date. Version: 7.5.503 / Virus Database: 269.15.12/1097 - Release 10/28/2007 1:58 PM Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 13, 2007 Report Share Posted November 13, 2007 Dear Ash, Thanks for your encouragement. I will surely present my analysis after Raj’s attempt. Thanks & Regards, Manu On Behalf Of Ash Tuesday, November 13, 2007 4:10 AM To: RE: Accuracy of the Chart Dear Manu, Good analysis. Guide Raj and others who want to learn on the approach. And Congratz on fantastic attempt. Practice will make u perfect. Cheers !!! Ash -> http://www.ashtro.ca On Behalf Of Raj Rajesh Monday November 12, 2007 9:39 AM RE: Accuracy of the Chart Dear Friends, I checked with the native. She confirmed about the data. Satish , her time of marriage is 15 Feb,1994 , Ra / Ra . Manu , yes she left job because of the co-workers. Now about the medical field, She started studying medical but left it in between because of the injury in Knee. She is not slim. Manu , How did you find out about the medical thing ??? This is the info I have so far. Thanks Guys, Regards, Raj Rajesh Manu V Batura <astro.manu > wrote: Dear Raj, It is a very interesting chart. I am getting the following positions with time taken as 17:54 (Given time + 4mins) for nullifying sa delay since marriage is very early: AV Deg as 26vir54 su 3 11ari20 mo 3 08tau05 ma 5 09gem52 me 5 00ari11 Ju 4 17aqu29 ve 5 26aqu04 sa 2 07gem52 ra 29sco18 ke 29tau18 Me, Ra and Ke are right on the verge of changing signs. Me is in starting degrees of aries. There are 2 zeroes in the chart, in 3rd house due to me and in 9th house due to ma. I agree with you that this current chart cannot give happy married life. NK and FK ve is in 6th house with ju lord of B. Nevertheless the chart is interesting. Can you please find the following for me from the native: Why did the native leave her job? Did she encounter a problem from her superiors or friends? Is she very slim? Was she working in the medical field or studied in that area? Thanks & Regards, Manu <hr size=2 width= " 100% " align=center tabIndex=-1> On Behalf Of Raj Rajesh Tuesday, November 06, 2007 5:30 PM astrology group Accuracy of the Chart Dear Friends, I have a chart of female , who says her TOB is correct. I am not getting her time of marriage right. Female 24 April, 1974 , 17.50 , Surat , 21N10, 72 E50. India She say she got married on 15 Feb, 1994 in Rahu / Rahu . How ? She says she has good married life . Other events are joined new job 4 dec 2001 - Ra/Me Went to USA : June 2004 , Ra/Ve Left Job : July 2007 -- Ra/Su Blessed with Daughter : 16 Jan, 2000 -- Ra/Sat Pls help. Regards & Thanks, Raj Rajesh Internal Virus Database is out-of-date. Version: 7.5.503 / Virus Database: 269.15.12/1097 - Release 10/28/2007 1:58 PM Internal Virus Database is out-of-date. Version: 7.5.503 / Virus Database: 269.15.12/1097 - Release 10/28/2007 1:58 PM Internal Virus Database is out-of-date. Version: 7.5.503 / Virus Database: 269.15.12/1097 - Release 10/28/2007 1:58 PM Version: 7.5.503 / Virus Database: 269.15.30/1127 - Release 11/12/2007 9:19 PM Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 16, 2007 Report Share Posted November 16, 2007 Dear Ash , Manu and other friends, I am still confused about this chart. How did Ra give marriage ? Now as far as the medical field is concerned, If you check 10th lords navamsha position from Lagna , sun and moon it comes Ma, Ju, Ju. Now Mars is in 10th with 5 points. But is it enough for medical field ? what I am misiing ? There are mixed planets in Divisionals also. She keep on insisting that her marriage life is ok. How ??????? Pls suggest. Regards, Raj RajeshAsh <kas wrote: Dear Manu, Good analysis. Guide Raj and others who want to learn on the approach. And Congratz on fantastic attempt. Practice will make u perfect. Cheers !!! Ash -> http://www.ashtro.ca On Behalf Of Raj RajeshMonday November 12, 2007 9:39 AM Subject: RE: Accuracy of the Chart Dear Friends, I checked with the native. She confirmed about the data. Satish , her time of marriage is 15 Feb,1994 , Ra / Ra . Manu , yes she left job because of the co-workers. Now about the medical field, She started studying medical but left it in between because of the injury in Knee. She is not slim. Manu , How did you find out about the medical thing ??? This is the info I have so far. Thanks Guys, Regards, Raj RajeshManu V Batura <astro.manu > wrote: Dear Raj, It is a very interesting chart. I am getting the following positions with time taken as 17:54 (Given time + 4mins) for nullifying sa delay since marriage is very early: AV Deg as 26vir54 su 3 11ari20 mo 3 08tau05 ma 5 09gem52 me 5 00ari11 Ju 4 17aqu29 ve 5 26aqu04 sa 2 07gem52 ra 29sco18 ke 29tau18 Me, Ra and Ke are right on the verge of changing signs. Me is in starting degrees of aries. There are 2 zeroes in the chart, in 3rd house due to me and in 9th house due to ma. I agree with you that this current chart cannot give happy married life. NK and FK ve is in 6th house with ju lord of B. Nevertheless the chart is interesting. Can you please find the following for me from the native: Why did the native leave her job? Did she encounter a problem from her superiors or friends? Is she very slim? Was she working in the medical field or studied in that area? Thanks & Regards, Manu size=2 width="100%" align=center tabIndex=-1> On Behalf Of Raj RajeshTuesday, November 06, 2007 5:30 PMastrology group Accuracy of the Chart Dear Friends, I have a chart of female , who says her TOB is correct. I am not getting her time of marriage right. Female 24 April, 1974 , 17.50 , Surat , 21N10, 72 E50. India She say she got married on 15 Feb, 1994 in Rahu / Rahu . How ? She says she has good married life .. Other events are joined new job 4 dec 2001 - Ra/Me Went to USA : June 2004 , Ra/Ve Left Job : July 2007 -- Ra/Su Blessed with Daughter : 16 Jan, 2000 -- Ra/Sat Pls help. Regards & Thanks, Raj Rajesh Internal Virus Database is out-of-date.Version: 7.5.503 / Virus Database: 269.15.12/1097 - Release 10/28/2007 1:58 PM Internal Virus Database is out-of-date.Version: 7.5.503 / Virus Database: 269.15.12/1097 - Release 10/28/2007 1:58 PM Be a better sports nut! Let your teams follow you with Mobile. Try it now. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 18, 2007 Report Share Posted November 18, 2007 Dear Raj, Good to see your attempt. You have identified that Ma, Ju and Ju. Now if you read the chapter of occupation you will find that Ma, Ju and Ve need to be strong. I don’t have the chart in front, but if I remember correctly, Ve was placed with Ju so it is SD to Ju. Also, all Ma, Ju and Ve come into play. Moreover Ju + Ve combination in 6th house is also a good combination to give inclination towards medical profession. Hence the result. Thanks & Regards, Manu On Behalf Of Raj Rajesh Saturday, November 17, 2007 6:47 AM To: RE: Accuracy of the Chart Dear Ash , Manu and other friends, I am still confused about this chart. How did Ra give marriage ? Now as far as the medical field is concerned, If you check 10th lords navamsha position from Lagna , sun and moon it comes Ma, Ju, Ju. Now Mars is in 10th with 5 points. But is it enough for medical field ? what I am misiing ? There are mixed planets in Divisionals also. She keep on insisting that her marriage life is ok. How ??????? Pls suggest. Regards, Raj Rajesh Ash <kas wrote: Dear Manu, Good analysis. Guide Raj and others who want to learn on the approach. And Congratz on fantastic attempt. Practice will make u perfect. Cheers !!! Ash -> http://www.ashtro.ca On Behalf Of Raj Rajesh Monday November 12, 2007 9:39 AM RE: Accuracy of the Chart Dear Friends, I checked with the native. She confirmed about the data. Satish , her time of marriage is 15 Feb,1994 , Ra / Ra . Manu , yes she left job because of the co-workers. Now about the medical field, She started studying medical but left it in between because of the injury in Knee. She is not slim. Manu , How did you find out about the medical thing ??? This is the info I have so far. Thanks Guys, Regards, Raj Rajesh Manu V Batura <astro.manu > wrote: Dear Raj, It is a very interesting chart. I am getting the following positions with time taken as 17:54 (Given time + 4mins) for nullifying sa delay since marriage is very early: AV Deg as 26vir54 su 3 11ari20 mo 3 08tau05 ma 5 09gem52 me 5 00ari11 Ju 4 17aqu29 ve 5 26aqu04 sa 2 07gem52 ra 29sco18 ke 29tau18 Me, Ra and Ke are right on the verge of changing signs. Me is in starting degrees of aries. There are 2 zeroes in the chart, in 3rd house due to me and in 9th house due to ma. I agree with you that this current chart cannot give happy married life. NK and FK ve is in 6th house with ju lord of B. Nevertheless the chart is interesting. Can you please find the following for me from the native: Why did the native leave her job? Did she encounter a problem from her superiors or friends? Is she very slim? Was she working in the medical field or studied in that area? Thanks & Regards, Manu size=2 width= " 100% " align=center tabIndex=-1> On Behalf Of Raj Rajesh Tuesday, November 06, 2007 5:30 PM astrology group Accuracy of the Chart Dear Friends, I have a chart of female , who says her TOB is correct. I am not getting her time of marriage right. Female 24 April, 1974 , 17.50 , Surat , 21N10, 72 E50. India She say she got married on 15 Feb, 1994 in Rahu / Rahu . How ? She says she has good married life . Other events are joined new job 4 dec 2001 - Ra/Me Went to USA : June 2004 , Ra/Ve Left Job : July 2007 -- Ra/Su Blessed with Daughter : 16 Jan, 2000 -- Ra/Sat Pls help. Regards & Thanks, Raj Rajesh Internal Virus Database is out-of-date. Version: 7.5.503 / Virus Database: 269.15.12/1097 - Release 10/28/2007 1:58 PM Internal Virus Database is out-of-date. Version: 7.5.503 / Virus Database: 269.15.12/1097 - Release 10/28/2007 1:58 PM Be a better sports nut! Let your teams follow you with Mobile. Try it now. Version: 7.5.503 / Virus Database: 269.15.32/1131 - Release 11/14/2007 4:54 PM Version: 7.5.503 / Virus Database: 269.16.0/1136 - Release 11/17/2007 2:55 PM Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.