Guest guest Posted November 7, 2007 Report Share Posted November 7, 2007 The Parashar light software has some astakvarga charts. can i use those or is the methodology different , " Manu Batura " <astro.manu wrote: > > Dear Sonia, > > You can download the latest worksheet from Donna's website at: > > http://krushna.sageasita.com > > Thanks & Regards, > Manu > > > , Sonia Kumar > <sonia_kumar1002@> wrote: > > > > to do the analysis which worksheet should one use? the worksheet in > the files category says that the worksheet should be used for pre > 1900 numbers. can i use the same sheet? > > Sonia > > > > Raj Rajesh <astro_raj9@> wrote: > > Dear Satish, > > I am trying t find more info. I will keep you updated. > > Thanks Satish, very much, > > Regards, > > Raj Rajesh > > > > SPK <aquaris_rising@> wrote: > > One thing I forgot to mention. Sun-shukra distance is > > >43. I don't think this would cause delay but should > > be taken into account in quality of marriage. What > > were the circumstances of marriage. 19 years seems a > > bit early. > > --- SPK <aquaris_rising@> wrote: > > > > > Dear Rajesh, > > > This chart opens up a few question. > > > > > > 1. Guru aspects shani so can check shani delay if > > > present. However Guru is in shani sign kumbha so can > > > not check delay according to rules. I alos notice > > > that > > > guru is varagottma, i.e in kumbha in navansh as > > > well. > > > IS there a special rule for a varagottama planet? > > > > > > 2. Yes in KAS shani in 5th house in navansha is > > > taken > > > for delay. Everything else in navansha is used for > > > lords from rashi chart. Except in case of shani in > > > 5th > > > house. Nowhere else we take houses in navansha. > > > > > > 3. If we take there is no delay due to shani. Guru > > > is > > > aspecting A and is owner of B. However guru has more > > > than 4 points in B so Guru delay is ruled out. > > > > > > 4. So assuming no delay. Why rahu-rahu ? Yes rahu is > > > samadharmi ti Mangal and budh and mangal is > > > samadharmi > > > to guru who is LoD. But thats a long chain. Guru sub > > > is availale in 1995 so why rahu stepped in for guru. > > > He can step in for mangal or budh. Check again, may > > > be > > > she got married in 1995 in rahu-guru. The rest of > > > the > > > events seem to work with the given data. > > > > > > Satish > > > --- Raj Rajesh <astro_raj9@> wrote: > > > > > > > Dear Friends, > > > > I have a chart of female , who says her TOB is > > > > correct. I am not getting her time of marriage > > > > right. > > > > Female > > > > 24 April, 1974 , 17.50 , Surat , 21N10, 72 E50. > > > > India > > > > She say she got married on 15 Feb, 1994 in Rahu / > > > > Rahu . How ? She says she has good married life . > > > > Other events are > > > > joined new job 4 dec 2001 - Ra/Me > > > > Went to USA : June 2004 , Ra/Ve > > > > Left Job : July 2007 -- Ra/Su > > > > Blessed with Daughter : 16 Jan, 2000 -- Ra/Sat > > > > > > > > Pls help. > > > > > > > > Regards & Thanks, > > > > Raj Rajesh > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Tired of spam? Mail has the best spam > > > > protection around > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Tired of spam? Mail has the best spam > > > protection around > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 7, 2007 Report Share Posted November 7, 2007 Dear Sonia, I would suggest in favour of worksheet from Donna's website. Although it might be possible for configuring other software for varahamihira ashtakavarga, you will find it difficult if not impossible to configure for proper ayanamsa and other software will also not calculate the WS for you. The excel based program created for KAS is fantastic, try it. Thanks & Regards, Manu , " sonia_kumar1002 " <sonia_kumar1002 wrote: > > > The Parashar light software has some astakvarga charts. can i use > those or is the methodology different > > , " Manu Batura " > <astro.manu@> wrote: > > > > Dear Sonia, > > > > You can download the latest worksheet from Donna's website at: > > > > http://krushna.sageasita.com > > > > Thanks & Regards, > > Manu > > > > > > , Sonia Kumar > > <sonia_kumar1002@> wrote: > > > > > > to do the analysis which worksheet should one use? the worksheet in > > the files category says that the worksheet should be used for pre > > 1900 numbers. can i use the same sheet? > > > Sonia > > > > > > Raj Rajesh <astro_raj9@> wrote: > > > Dear Satish, > > > I am trying t find more info. I will keep you updated. > > > Thanks Satish, very much, > > > Regards, > > > Raj Rajesh > > > > > > SPK <aquaris_rising@> wrote: > > > One thing I forgot to mention. Sun-shukra distance is > > > >43. I don't think this would cause delay but should > > > be taken into account in quality of marriage. What > > > were the circumstances of marriage. 19 years seems a > > > bit early. > > > --- SPK <aquaris_rising@> wrote: > > > > > > > Dear Rajesh, > > > > This chart opens up a few question. > > > > > > > > 1. Guru aspects shani so can check shani delay if > > > > present. However Guru is in shani sign kumbha so can > > > > not check delay according to rules. I alos notice > > > > that > > > > guru is varagottma, i.e in kumbha in navansh as > > > > well. > > > > IS there a special rule for a varagottama planet? > > > > > > > > 2. Yes in KAS shani in 5th house in navansha is > > > > taken > > > > for delay. Everything else in navansha is used for > > > > lords from rashi chart. Except in case of shani in > > > > 5th > > > > house. Nowhere else we take houses in navansha. > > > > > > > > 3. If we take there is no delay due to shani. Guru > > > > is > > > > aspecting A and is owner of B. However guru has more > > > > than 4 points in B so Guru delay is ruled out. > > > > > > > > 4. So assuming no delay. Why rahu-rahu ? Yes rahu is > > > > samadharmi ti Mangal and budh and mangal is > > > > samadharmi > > > > to guru who is LoD. But thats a long chain. Guru sub > > > > is availale in 1995 so why rahu stepped in for guru. > > > > He can step in for mangal or budh. Check again, may > > > > be > > > > she got married in 1995 in rahu-guru. The rest of > > > > the > > > > events seem to work with the given data. > > > > > > > > Satish > > > > --- Raj Rajesh <astro_raj9@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > Dear Friends, > > > > > I have a chart of female , who says her TOB is > > > > > correct. I am not getting her time of marriage > > > > > right. > > > > > Female > > > > > 24 April, 1974 , 17.50 , Surat , 21N10, 72 E50. > > > > > India > > > > > She say she got married on 15 Feb, 1994 in Rahu / > > > > > Rahu . How ? She says she has good married life . > > > > > Other events are > > > > > joined new job 4 dec 2001 - Ra/Me > > > > > Went to USA : June 2004 , Ra/Ve > > > > > Left Job : July 2007 -- Ra/Su > > > > > Blessed with Daughter : 16 Jan, 2000 -- Ra/Sat > > > > > > > > > > Pls help. > > > > > > > > > > Regards & Thanks, > > > > > Raj Rajesh > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Tired of spam? Mail has the best spam > > > > > protection around > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Tired of spam? Mail has the best spam > > > > protection around > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Tired of spam? Mail has the best spam protection around > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 7, 2007 Report Share Posted November 7, 2007 Thanks would do the same Regards Sonia , " Manu Batura " <astro.manu wrote: > > Dear Sonia, > > I would suggest in favour of worksheet from Donna's website. Although > it might be possible for configuring other software for varahamihira > ashtakavarga, you will find it difficult if not impossible to > configure for proper ayanamsa and other software will also not > calculate the WS for you. > > The excel based program created for KAS is fantastic, try it. > > Thanks & Regards, > Manu > > > > > , " sonia_kumar1002 " > <sonia_kumar1002@> wrote: > > > > > > The Parashar light software has some astakvarga charts. can i use > > those or is the methodology different > > > > , " Manu Batura " > > <astro.manu@> wrote: > > > > > > Dear Sonia, > > > > > > You can download the latest worksheet from Donna's website at: > > > > > > http://krushna.sageasita.com > > > > > > Thanks & Regards, > > > Manu > > > > > > > > > , Sonia Kumar > > > <sonia_kumar1002@> wrote: > > > > > > > > to do the analysis which worksheet should one use? the > worksheet in > > > the files category says that the worksheet should be used for pre > > > 1900 numbers. can i use the same sheet? > > > > Sonia > > > > > > > > Raj Rajesh <astro_raj9@> wrote: > > > > Dear Satish, > > > > I am trying t find more info. I will keep you updated. > > > > Thanks Satish, very much, > > > > Regards, > > > > Raj Rajesh > > > > > > > > SPK <aquaris_rising@> wrote: > > > > One thing I forgot to mention. Sun-shukra distance is > > > > >43. I don't think this would cause delay but should > > > > be taken into account in quality of marriage. What > > > > were the circumstances of marriage. 19 years seems a > > > > bit early. > > > > --- SPK <aquaris_rising@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > Dear Rajesh, > > > > > This chart opens up a few question. > > > > > > > > > > 1. Guru aspects shani so can check shani delay if > > > > > present. However Guru is in shani sign kumbha so can > > > > > not check delay according to rules. I alos notice > > > > > that > > > > > guru is varagottma, i.e in kumbha in navansh as > > > > > well. > > > > > IS there a special rule for a varagottama planet? > > > > > > > > > > 2. Yes in KAS shani in 5th house in navansha is > > > > > taken > > > > > for delay. Everything else in navansha is used for > > > > > lords from rashi chart. Except in case of shani in > > > > > 5th > > > > > house. Nowhere else we take houses in navansha. > > > > > > > > > > 3. If we take there is no delay due to shani. Guru > > > > > is > > > > > aspecting A and is owner of B. However guru has more > > > > > than 4 points in B so Guru delay is ruled out. > > > > > > > > > > 4. So assuming no delay. Why rahu-rahu ? Yes rahu is > > > > > samadharmi ti Mangal and budh and mangal is > > > > > samadharmi > > > > > to guru who is LoD. But thats a long chain. Guru sub > > > > > is availale in 1995 so why rahu stepped in for guru. > > > > > He can step in for mangal or budh. Check again, may > > > > > be > > > > > she got married in 1995 in rahu-guru. The rest of > > > > > the > > > > > events seem to work with the given data. > > > > > > > > > > Satish > > > > > --- Raj Rajesh <astro_raj9@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Friends, > > > > > > I have a chart of female , who says her TOB is > > > > > > correct. I am not getting her time of marriage > > > > > > right. > > > > > > Female > > > > > > 24 April, 1974 , 17.50 , Surat , 21N10, 72 E50. > > > > > > India > > > > > > She say she got married on 15 Feb, 1994 in Rahu / > > > > > > Rahu . How ? She says she has good married life . > > > > > > Other events are > > > > > > joined new job 4 dec 2001 - Ra/Me > > > > > > Went to USA : June 2004 , Ra/Ve > > > > > > Left Job : July 2007 -- Ra/Su > > > > > > Blessed with Daughter : 16 Jan, 2000 -- Ra/Sat > > > > > > > > > > > > Pls help. > > > > > > > > > > > > Regards & Thanks, > > > > > > Raj Rajesh > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Tired of spam? Mail has the best spam > > > > > > protection around > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Tired of spam? Mail has the best spam > > > > > protection around > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Tired of spam? Mail has the best spam protection > around > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.