Guest guest Posted September 27, 2008 Report Share Posted September 27, 2008 Respected Krushna Sir, Thanks for clarifying the subject matter a bit more. Just for the sake my own learning, I am repeating the theory in simple words here (Pl correct me if I am wrong). For finding NRK for a house, first find NK. Then see where it is placed in the chart. Count 8th house from it. Again count 8th house from this 8th. Check where the lord of this 8th from 8th is placed. If it is 8th from that house then it will serve badly for the original house of which you detected NK. For finding FRK for a house, first find FK. Then see where it is placed in the chart. Count 8th house from it. Again count 8th house from this 8th. Check where the lord of 8th from 8th is placed. If it is 8th from that house then it will serve badly for the original house of which you detected FK. I also wanted to learn if; Rook Karak's are permanently bad for the house for which they are FRK / NRK,........... or / and, Root Karak's do not give the result of the house in their AD's only. Looking forward to your kind reply, Regards, Nihlesh Mathur On Sat, 27 Sep 2008 Jugal Kalani wrote : >Dear Nikhlesh Mathur, Prabha, Ramesh, Anup and all members, > All are very right track. The karak and root karak (karak of >karak) are very important to assess any house result. When any planet >is situated in 8th house from it self it spoils the karakatva. Or in >other words when any planet is situated in it's karak stan then it >looses the quality of it's karakavta. > In this chart Saturn is FRK and is situated in 8th from it's >sign. Same way Jupiter is NRK and it is also situated in 8th from >it's sign (natural R. Karak sign). There is 31 points in Lagna makes >him stub born. Moon in Scorpio with sixth lord also shows less >friends and his talking is pinching. Su and Ve distance is more even >is Extreme. This may give multiple close relations too. > Now Prabha asked one question: why not got married in Mars >antra as Mars is LOE. Very nice question. For this the Karak stan for >house E is 7th house and in the karak stan of Ma Sixth lord is >situated, which spoiles the karakatva for 12th house. So Mars is not >able to give the result. > Thanks > krushna > > > > , " nikhlesh mathur " ><nikhleshmathur wrote: > > > > > > 26.09.2008 > > Dear Prabha ji, > > > > Your queries are very obvious and pertinent to the >subject matter. > > > > Let me tell you one of my observations first ie. > > > > `Native who did not marry or got married at a very late age, most >of them did NOT have any zero in their SAV chart. " > > > > However, I have still to validate this by locating many more such >natives & their correct charts. This is just an observation. > > > > Another important facet is the 'blessings' in a chart. > > > > Blessings tend to push the `so called good events' towards >completion. I am using the term `So called' because it is not >necessary that `good event' turn out to be really good for a native >in his/her lifetime. > > > > Blessings act just as catalyst act in chemical reactions. In order >a chemical reaction to proceed favorably in the making of a product, >we require the most appropriate catalyst to be added at the right >time during the reaction (ie in specified concentration at specific >temperature, pressure etc). > > > > Blessings act in the same way, I believe. Chemical reactions also >might complete without catalyst but they may take extremely long time >to do so and the end product then will not be of the desired quality. >Similar is the case with `Blessings' or in absence of `Blessings'. > > > > This chart does not have blessings to counter the weak planets for >the 7th house. Therefore the `Yogas' got lost or did'nt work out, in >my belief. > > > > The other important facet for all is the nature of the person, some >of which change with the transitory effects, absence of blessings, >the changing AD's etc. > > A large distance between Su & Ve plus control of Ve by Sa for this >native must have had a great impact on him for matters related to >life partner. > > > > In my opinion such effects work like parabolas. Their intensity >keeps rising until a peak is reached and then they take a `U' turn >and begin loosing the intensity, with time. > > > > People tend to `compromise' during this `Falling' period of the >parabola. For approving marriage partners they then reluctantly >dilute their strict specifications. But a lot of time passes by that >time. > > Some people hinge this with their income, status in job, other >important issues in their family (such as for example marriage of >younger sister first). > > > > All these come naturally to the native and they tend to become >adamant. Adamancy of mind is also some kind of efforts (whether right >or wrong.....is a different issue). And we all know that efforts >change the result of the yogas. > > > > Coming to your question as to why the native did not marry in the >AD of Ma (Oct 06 to Oct 07) though Ma is LoE from Asc and LoD from >Sun chart ; > > i) One of the reason as you rightly stated could be low points >of Ma. > > > > ii) Then Ma is L12 from Moon chart. > > > > iii) His Ma is sitting so close to Sun that it is has gone >combusted ( lost its intensity to give result on its own). > > > > iv) His 7th house total SAV points of 3,6,10,11 are extremely low >( only 66 from Asc). It means problems associated with the 7th house. > > > > v) His 6th lord Ve is placed alongside a strong significator for >the 6th house (Moon). This indicates separation. You said he already >separated in an affair. This might be impacting the native very >strongly because he must have had a feeling of `Marital attachment' >with that girl " . > > > > About your question as to why some people get married at ages of 40 >plus or even at 50 plus…………my answer is that the nature of the >native, his adamancy on certain facets of life, his firm decision on >certain other priorities in life etc. etc. negate the weak yoga's >made by his chart. So when later in life when the parabola return >downwards they concede to their destiny, sometimes very reluctantly, >sometimes with renewed interest. > > > > The above explanation of mine might have de-railed from the `KAS >track', at some points but I sincerely feel that one generally negate >some of the yoga's by our will (positive aspects) or adamancy >(negative aspects). The 'will' or the 'adamancy' works well when the >planets are weak. > > And that is what must have happened in the case of this native. > > > > I am as anxiously waiting as you must be for the KAS experts to >answer your queries so that we all improve knowledge through such >charts. > > > > Regards, > > Nikhlesh Mathur > > > > > > > > On Fri, 26 Sep 2008 prabha.acharya wrote : > > >Respected Guruji, Ash ji, Anup ji, Nikhilesh Ji, > > >I have few doubts regarding this chart: > > >1. This chart definitely shows unhappy marriage. Sa is not >aspecting > > >lord/housse of A, B, C . There are no zeros in SAV's. Only delay >is Ju > > >in Libra in D9 and the distance between Su-Ve. How does one see why > > >this native didn't get married till 30yrs? When does it show in a > > >chart, the native's getting married late in their life say above >30, > > >40 or even people marry when they are 50yrs? > > >2. Why didn't this native marry in Ma dasha? Is it because Ma is >less > > >than 12pts? > > >Thanks > > >Prabha > > > , " nikhlesh mathur " > > ><nikhleshmathur@> wrote: > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.