Guest guest Posted February 8, 2009 Report Share Posted February 8, 2009 Respected Guruji, Ashji, and List Members, This is a chart of an unhappy marriage. According to the lady her husband is under his mother's control Husband: 27/3/1980, 8.20am, Howrah 22N35, 88E13 Wife: 15/2/1983, 6.10pm, Kolkatta, 22N34, 88E22 Thanks Prabha Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 9, 2009 Report Share Posted February 9, 2009 Dear Prabhaji and list, I cast the chart of husband and got the lagna 3 Ta 25. There is Sat delay in this chart. All the ingredients of an unhappy marriage are there in this chart. Sun to Ve distace is 46 Deg,Ven is krittika,Sat aspects Moon in navamsa,Sat is placed with Mars in Rasi,6th lord Ve is with NRK in navamsa,also in house E,in WS first and 7th house difference is more etc..... The person looks like stubborn and of adamant kind. Such persons are of unbending nature and some time sensitive too. Something always keep moving in mind that any decision taken once is always right and so they wont change otherwise easily. Blessings in lagna and quality ratios from lagna and Ve are reduced due to these factors. Sat is week in third house and he should have interact the circumstaces with cool mind which perhaps he seldom did. What is their date of marriage Prabhaji ? Regards Anup --- On Mon, 9/2/09, prabha.acharya <prabha.acharya wrote: prabha.acharya <prabha.acharya A chart Date: Monday, 9 February, 2009, 9:45 AM Respected Guruji, Ashji, and List Members,This is a chart of an unhappy marriage. According to the lady herhusband is under his mother's controlHusband: 27/3/1980, 8.20am, Howrah 22N35, 88E13Wife: 15/2/1983, 6.10pm, Kolkatta, 22N34, 88E22ThanksPrabha Connect with friends all over the world.. Get India Messenger. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 9, 2009 Report Share Posted February 9, 2009 Dear Anup Ji and Prabha Ji, I got the asc.as 3 Ta 32 in husband chart..Blessings are present in this chart because the relationship between Ve and Sa is 5:9. Ve is 6th lord and occupy house E with 5 bindus.The distance of Ve from Su is >43. Ve is being aspected by Ju in rasi and navamsa.Therefore the affliction of Ve is neutralised. The relationship of 7thlord from lagna,Su and Mo is 5:9, 1:7 and 2:12.Therefore total accumulation of points is 45.This means the marriage might be harmonious. There is full delay of Sa but this delay is moderated due to the sight of Ju on Sa in navamsa. I think marriage might have happened in the first sector of Sa antra, the period from 26 Jul 2006 to 15 Aug 2007. Now the problem is Sa has the lowest point in WS for 7th house. The marriage should not be in Sa antra. And the preceding antra of Ju can not give the event because the delay period will be over on 17 May 2005. If blemishes of chart is neutralised then it might happen due to blessings in Ju antra.. So Prabha Ji please tell us the date of marriage. Thanks and regards. Ramesh Mishrarcmastro--- On Mon, 9/2/09, Anup. M <dalh_1 wrote: Anup. M <dalh_1Re: A chart Date: Monday, 9 February, 2009, 3:51 PM Dear Prabhaji and list, I cast the chart of husband and got the lagna 3 Ta 25. There is Sat delay in this chart. All the ingredients of an unhappy marriage are there in this chart. Sun to Ve distace is 46 Deg,Ven is krittika,Sat aspects Moon in navamsa,Sat is placed with Mars in Rasi,6th lord Ve is with NRK in navamsa,also in house E,in WS first and 7th house difference is more etc..... The person looks like stubborn and of adamant kind. Such persons are of unbending nature and some time sensitive too. Something always keep moving in mind that any decision taken once is always right and so they wont change otherwise easily. Blessings in lagna and quality ratios from lagna and Ve are reduced due to these factors. Sat is week in third house and he should have interact the circumstaces with cool mind which perhaps he seldom did. What is their date of marriage Prabhaji ? Regards Anup --- On Mon, 9/2/09, prabha.acharya <prabha.acharya@ gmail.com> wrote: prabha.acharya <prabha.acharya@ gmail.com>[astrologyandtiming events] A chartastrologyandtiminge vents@ s.comMonday, 9 February, 2009, 9:45 AM Respected Guruji, Ashji, and List Members,This is a chart of an unhappy marriage. According to the lady herhusband is under his mother's controlHusband: 27/3/1980, 8.20am, Howrah 22N35, 88E13Wife: 15/2/1983, 6.10pm, Kolkatta, 22N34, 88E22ThanksPrabha Connect with friends all over the world.. Get India Messenger. Add more friends to your messenger and enjoy! Invite them now. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 9, 2009 Report Share Posted February 9, 2009 Dear Ramesh ji and group, I think "chronic errors" in a chart like Ven in kritikka and Sun-Ven distance more than 43 deg are irreparable by Jup. As per my understanding ,Jup in such cases can control the Ven only when Ven is not a 6th lord.Rahu,Mars,Sat are all natural malefic and are together in house D.Quality marriage in such case generally have to suffer or reduced. So,marriage in antra of low planet like Sat can not be ruled out. Regards Anup --- On Mon, 9/2/09, ramesh mishra <aarceemastro2002 wrote: ramesh mishra <aarceemastro2002Re: A chart Date: Monday, 9 February, 2009, 7:29 PM Dear Anup Ji and Prabha Ji, I got the asc.as 3 Ta 32 in husband chart..Blessings are present in this chart because the relationship between Ve and Sa is 5:9. Ve is 6th lord and occupy house E with 5 bindus.The distance of Ve from Su is >43. Ve is being aspected by Ju in rasi and navamsa.Therefore the affliction of Ve is neutralised. The relationship of 7thlord from lagna,Su and Mo is 5:9, 1:7 and 2:12.Therefore total accumulation of points is 45.This means the marriage might be harmonious. There is full delay of Sa but this delay is moderated due to the sight of Ju on Sa in navamsa. I think marriage might have happened in the first sector of Sa antra, the period from 26 Jul 2006 to 15 Aug 2007. Now the problem is Sa has the lowest point in WS for 7th house. The marriage should not be in Sa antra. And the preceding antra of Ju can not give the event because the delay period will be over on 17 May 2005. If blemishes of chart is neutralised then it might happen due to blessings in Ju antra.. So Prabha Ji please tell us the date of marriage. Thanks and regards. Ramesh Mishrarcmastro--- On Mon, 9/2/09, Anup. M <dalh_1 > wrote: Anup. M <dalh_1 >Re: [astrologyandtiming events] A chartastrologyandtiminge vents@ s.comMonday, 9 February, 2009, 3:51 PM Dear Prabhaji and list, I cast the chart of husband and got the lagna 3 Ta 25. There is Sat delay in this chart. All the ingredients of an unhappy marriage are there in this chart. Sun to Ve distace is 46 Deg,Ven is krittika,Sat aspects Moon in navamsa,Sat is placed with Mars in Rasi,6th lord Ve is with NRK in navamsa,also in house E,in WS first and 7th house difference is more etc..... The person looks like stubborn and of adamant kind. Such persons are of unbending nature and some time sensitive too. Something always keep moving in mind that any decision taken once is always right and so they wont change otherwise easily. Blessings in lagna and quality ratios from lagna and Ve are reduced due to these factors. Sat is week in third house and he should have interact the circumstaces with cool mind which perhaps he seldom did. What is their date of marriage Prabhaji ? Regards Anup --- On Mon, 9/2/09, prabha.acharya <prabha.acharya@ gmail.com> wrote: prabha.acharya <prabha.acharya@ gmail.com>[astrologyandtiming events] A chartastrologyandtiminge vents@ s.comMonday, 9 February, 2009, 9:45 AM Respected Guruji, Ashji, and List Members,This is a chart of an unhappy marriage. According to the lady herhusband is under his mother's controlHusband: 27/3/1980, 8.20am, Howrah 22N35, 88E13Wife: 15/2/1983, 6.10pm, Kolkatta, 22N34, 88E22ThanksPrabha Connect with friends all over the world.. Get India Messenger. Add more friends to your messenger and enjoy! Invite them now. Add more friends to your messenger and enjoy! Invite them now. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 9, 2009 Report Share Posted February 9, 2009 Respected Guruji, Ash ji and List Members This chart was given to me by one of my friends as a quiz. She just gave me the hint that the marriage was on January 21. She didn't divulge the year. As soon as I get the details I will post them. So now work with that hint on both the charts. I think as Anupji has said Ju aspecting Ve doesn't repair the spoils of Ve [like Ve-Su distance and Ve in Krittika, Ve aspected by Sa] but those mistakes can be rectified for timing by Transit Ju when it aspects Lagna/Lagna Lord/7th House/7th Lord. That is my understanding. Thanks Prabha , " prabha.acharya " <prabha.acharya wrote: > > Respected Guruji, Ashji, and List Members, > This is a chart of an unhappy marriage. According to the lady her > husband is under his mother's control > Husband: 27/3/1980, 8.20am, Howrah 22N35, 88E13 > Wife: 15/2/1983, 6.10pm, Kolkatta, 22N34, 88E22 > > Thanks > Prabha > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 9, 2009 Report Share Posted February 9, 2009 Dear Prabha ji and group, Qualitywise,i wrote those technical points. So timing of event is different as we know all. Here you already have written that marriage is unhappy, so we are finding the obvious reasons,few of those i tried to write..Transit of guru for rectification is for timing and guru does not rectify "quality" of an event. Regards Anup --- On Mon, 9/2/09, prabha.acharya <prabha.acharya wrote: prabha.acharya <prabha.acharya Re: A chart Date: Monday, 9 February, 2009, 11:24 PM Respected Guruji, Ash ji and List MembersThis chart was given to me by one of my friends as a quiz. She justgave me the hint that the marriage was on January 21. She didn'tdivulge the year. As soon as I get the details I will post them.So now work with that hint on both the charts. I think as Anupji has said Ju aspecting Ve doesn't repair the spoilsof Ve [like Ve-Su distance and Ve in Krittika, Ve aspected by Sa] butthose mistakes can be rectified for timing by Transit Ju when itaspects Lagna/Lagna Lord/7th House/7th Lord.That is my understanding. ThanksPrabhaastrologyandtiminge vents@ s.com, "prabha.acharya"<prabha.acharya@ ...> wrote:>> Respected Guruji, Ashji, and List Members,> This is a chart of an unhappy marriage. According to the lady her> husband is under his mother's control> Husband: 27/3/1980, 8.20am, Howrah 22N35, 88E13> Wife: 15/2/1983, 6.10pm, Kolkatta, 22N34, 88E22> > Thanks> Prabha> Connect with friends all over the world.. Get India Messenger. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 9, 2009 Report Share Posted February 9, 2009 Respected Guruji, Ashji and List Members, Here is my analysis of the charts of the couple ********************************************************* I will attempt the wife's chart. I get Asc as 10Le59. The points I saw in the chart are: 1.Lagna points are 32 and 7th house points are 18. So she looks like adamant, egoistic and dominating character. 2. Ve the NK is in Ra/Ke axis in D9 and is with Ma both in D1 & D9. 3. LL /7L are in 5:9 position, Mo lord/7th lord from Mo are in 3:11 position, Su lord/7L are in 5:9 position. 4. From Ve and Ma also the 7th lord are in 5:9 position. 5. In D9 the LL [Mo] and 9th lord [Ju] are in 5:9 position. 6. Ma and Ve are conjunct Though she has a dominating nature the marriage and difference between Lagna and 7th house is more but marriage happened as the native has elders blessings. LoA=Me; LoB=Sa; LoC= Me; LoD=Ma; LoE=Mo 1.Me as LoA is in 6th house, aspected by 6th lord Sa in D9, 6th lord Ju [of D9] is aspecting Me and therefore Me is spoiled. 2. RK Ma is in Ra/Ke axis in D9. For timing; 1. Sa is LoB and aspects LoA, LoC : so full delay by Sa. 2. There is no Ju delay. 3. There are no zeroes. Full delay of Sa would have ended when Sa enters Virgo. There are blessings in the chart. Mo, Ma, Ju in HoD [with 7points] are eager to give results. So approximately when she turns 25 years [i don't know in case of blessings how many years can be reduced] she was running Ke AD [sept. 2006-Sept 2007]. Ke is SD to Ju. **************************************************** I got Asc as 3Tau30 for the husband's chart The points I saw in the chart are: 1. Lagna points are 34. This shows adamant, egoistic and dominating character. 2. Ve-Su distance is >43 degrees. Ve is also the 6th lord. 3. Ve/Ma is in 5:9 position, Mo/Sa is in 2:12 position, Ju/Me is in 1:7 position. 4. Ve is also in krittika Nks. 5. There are blessings in the chart with Ve/Sa in 5:9 in D1 & D9 6. Sa aspects Mo in D9. 7. Sa is conjunct Ve in D9. This chart has blessings of elders. LoA=Me; LoB= Ma; LoC=Ju; LoD= Su; LoE=Ma 1. Sa aspects LoA, and is conjunct LoB and LoC – so there is Sa delay. 2. Ju aspects LoA, and conjunct LoB – so there is Ju delay too. 3. There are no zeroes in the chart. Of course with Ju is aspecting Sa but Sa is also with 6th lord Ve in D9. Full delay of Sa ends when Sa enters cancer in june 2005. At that time Ju is in Virgo after completing 2 rounds and aspecting 7th lord. In Oct 2005 it enters Libra, but though it is aspecting LL Ve, it will not rectify the mistakes in the chart. In Nov 2006, Ju entered Scorpio which is the 7th house from where Ju is also aspecting Asc. Therefore both Ve-Su distance and Ve in krittika can be said to be rectified. Next when Ju enters Sagittarius in Dec 2007 then he was running Sa AD[July 2006 – Sept 2009]. So since she has given me the month as January 21. I think the year would have been 2007. Thanks Prabha , " prabha.acharya " <prabha.acharya wrote: > > Respected Guruji, Ash ji and List Members > This chart was given to me by one of my friends as a quiz. She just > gave me the hint that the marriage was on January 21. She didn't > divulge the year. As soon as I get the details I will post them. > So now work with that hint on both the charts. > I think as Anupji has said Ju aspecting Ve doesn't repair the spoils > of Ve [like Ve-Su distance and Ve in Krittika, Ve aspected by Sa] but > those mistakes can be rectified for timing by Transit Ju when it > aspects Lagna/Lagna Lord/7th House/7th Lord. > That is my understanding. > Thanks > Prabha > , " prabha.acharya " > <prabha.acharya@> wrote: > > > > Respected Guruji, Ashji, and List Members, > > This is a chart of an unhappy marriage. According to the lady her > > husband is under his mother's control > > Husband: 27/3/1980, 8.20am, Howrah 22N35, 88E13 > > Wife: 15/2/1983, 6.10pm, Kolkatta, 22N34, 88E22 > > > > Thanks > > Prabha > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 9, 2009 Report Share Posted February 9, 2009 Respected Guruji, Ashji and List Members, I forgot to add that in husband's chart the LoE is Ma. After all the delay period and rectifications are considered Sa which is SD to Ma came forward to give the result. That also explains unhappy marriage since Sa has only 1 point in the WS. Thanks Prabha , " prabha.acharya " <prabha.acharya wrote: > > Respected Guruji, Ashji and List Members, > Here is my analysis of the charts of the couple > ********************************************************* > I will attempt the wife's chart. I get Asc as 10Le59. > The points I saw in the chart are: > 1.Lagna points are 32 and 7th house points are 18. So she looks like > adamant, egoistic and dominating character. > 2. Ve the NK is in Ra/Ke axis in D9 and is with Ma both in D1 & D9. > 3. LL /7L are in 5:9 position, Mo lord/7th lord from Mo are in 3:11 > position, Su lord/7L are in 5:9 position. > 4. From Ve and Ma also the 7th lord are in 5:9 position. > 5. In D9 the LL [Mo] and 9th lord [Ju] are in 5:9 position. > 6. Ma and Ve are conjunct > Though she has a dominating nature the marriage and difference between > Lagna and 7th house is more but marriage happened as the native has > elders blessings. > > LoA=Me; LoB=Sa; LoC= Me; LoD=Ma; LoE=Mo > 1.Me as LoA is in 6th house, aspected by 6th lord Sa in D9, 6th lord > Ju [of D9] is aspecting Me and therefore Me is spoiled. > 2. RK Ma is in Ra/Ke axis in D9. > > For timing; > 1. Sa is LoB and aspects LoA, LoC : so full delay by Sa. > 2. There is no Ju delay. > 3. There are no zeroes. > Full delay of Sa would have ended when Sa enters Virgo. There are > blessings in the chart. > Mo, Ma, Ju in HoD [with 7points] are eager to give results. > So approximately when she turns 25 years [i don't know in case of > blessings how many years can be reduced] she was running Ke AD [sept. > 2006-Sept 2007]. Ke is SD to Ju. > **************************************************** > I got Asc as 3Tau30 for the husband's chart > The points I saw in the chart are: > 1. Lagna points are 34. This shows adamant, egoistic and dominating > character. > 2. Ve-Su distance is >43 degrees. Ve is also the 6th lord. > 3. Ve/Ma is in 5:9 position, Mo/Sa is in 2:12 position, Ju/Me is in > 1:7 position. > 4. Ve is also in krittika Nks. > 5. There are blessings in the chart with Ve/Sa in 5:9 in D1 & D9 > 6. Sa aspects Mo in D9. > 7. Sa is conjunct Ve in D9. > This chart has blessings of elders. > > LoA=Me; LoB= Ma; LoC=Ju; LoD= Su; LoE=Ma > 1. Sa aspects LoA, and is conjunct LoB and LoC – so there is Sa delay. > 2. Ju aspects LoA, and conjunct LoB – so there is Ju delay too. > 3. There are no zeroes in the chart. > Of course with Ju is aspecting Sa but Sa is also with 6th lord Ve in D9. > Full delay of Sa ends when Sa enters cancer in june 2005. At that time > Ju is in Virgo after completing 2 rounds and aspecting 7th lord. In > Oct 2005 it enters Libra, but though it is aspecting LL Ve, it will > not rectify the mistakes in the chart. > In Nov 2006, Ju entered Scorpio which is the 7th house from where Ju > is also aspecting Asc. Therefore both Ve-Su distance and Ve in > krittika can be said to be rectified. > Next when Ju enters Sagittarius in Dec 2007 then he was running Sa > AD[July 2006 – Sept 2009]. > So since she has given me the month as January 21. I think the year > would have been 2007. > > Thanks > Prabha > , " prabha.acharya " > <prabha.acharya@> wrote: > > > > Respected Guruji, Ash ji and List Members > > This chart was given to me by one of my friends as a quiz. She just > > gave me the hint that the marriage was on January 21. She didn't > > divulge the year. As soon as I get the details I will post them. > > So now work with that hint on both the charts. > > I think as Anupji has said Ju aspecting Ve doesn't repair the spoils > > of Ve [like Ve-Su distance and Ve in Krittika, Ve aspected by Sa] but > > those mistakes can be rectified for timing by Transit Ju when it > > aspects Lagna/Lagna Lord/7th House/7th Lord. > > That is my understanding. > > Thanks > > Prabha > > , " prabha.acharya " > > <prabha.acharya@> wrote: > > > > > > Respected Guruji, Ashji, and List Members, > > > This is a chart of an unhappy marriage. According to the lady her > > > husband is under his mother's control > > > Husband: 27/3/1980, 8.20am, Howrah 22N35, 88E13 > > > Wife: 15/2/1983, 6.10pm, Kolkatta, 22N34, 88E22 > > > > > > Thanks > > > Prabha > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 9, 2009 Report Share Posted February 9, 2009 Dear Anup Ji, Prabha Ji and group I could not understand how Prabha Ji is getting Asc. as 10 Le 59 whereas I am getting it 12 Le 48.We have same program then asc.rising should also be equal. Second point as stated by Prabha Ji is that she mentioned Ju, Mo and Ma in house of D but I am getting quite a different picture. Ju is in D house for 7th and Ma is in 7th and Mo is in 8th house. Therefore this chart has confused me.Either my casting is wrong or Prabha Ji has made a mistake somewhere. According to my chart There is full delay by Sa and no delay by Ju. If you go as per KAS this chart shows a harmonious relationship. But if you see the quality of chart for marriage then presence of Su and Ma in 7th house is not good with Ve. Ve being NK is afflicted by Su and Ma in rasi and navamsa.There is added affliction to Ve by Ra and Ke in D9. Me being LoA and LoC for 7th is in black hole thereby reducing the strength of house A and house C. One more point is to be noted that Me being LoC is in 8th place from its ownership.Thus her house C has become weak. Blessings are present in this chart also like the chart of her husband. See the difference of these two charts. In her husband chart Ju was mitigating the afflictions of Ve but in this chart there is nothing like that. So if you consider the blessings then marriage could have been during Ju antra period from Sep 2001 to Apr 2004. Ju is weak in 5th house. So unless we assure the correct birth time it is useless to devote the time in such type of chart. Though we know the approximate date of marriage somehow we try to proof the event within the KAS framework Thanks and regards. Ramesh Mishra rcmastro--- On Tue, 10/2/09, prabha.acharya <prabha.acharya wrote: prabha.acharya <prabha.acharya Re: A chart Date: Tuesday, 10 February, 2009, 9:58 AM Respected Guruji, Ashji and List Members,Here is my analysis of the charts of the couple************ ********* ********* ********* ********* *********I will attempt the wife's chart. I get Asc as 10Le59. The points I saw in the chart are:1.Lagna points are 32 and 7th house points are 18. So she looks likeadamant, egoistic and dominating character.2. Ve the NK is in Ra/Ke axis in D9 and is with Ma both in D1 & D9.3. LL /7L are in 5:9 position, Mo lord/7th lord from Mo are in 3:11position, Su lord/7L are in 5:9 position.4. From Ve and Ma also the 7th lord are in 5:9 position.5. In D9 the LL [Mo] and 9th lord [Ju] are in 5:9 position.6. Ma and Ve are conjunct Though she has a dominating nature the marriage and difference betweenLagna and 7th house is more but marriage happened as the native haselders blessings.LoA=Me; LoB=Sa; LoC= Me; LoD=Ma; LoE=Mo1.Me as LoA is in 6th house, aspected by 6th lord Sa in D9, 6th lordJu [of D9] is aspecting Me and therefore Me is spoiled.2. RK Ma is in Ra/Ke axis in D9.For timing;1. Sa is LoB and aspects LoA, LoC : so full delay by Sa.2. There is no Ju delay.3. There are no zeroes.Full delay of Sa would have ended when Sa enters Virgo. There areblessings in the chart. Mo, Ma, Ju in HoD [with 7points] are eager to give results. So approximately when she turns 25 years [i don't know in case ofblessings how many years can be reduced] she was running Ke AD [sept.2006-Sept 2007]. Ke is SD to Ju.************ ********* ********* ********* ********* ****I got Asc as 3Tau30 for the husband's chartThe points I saw in the chart are:1. Lagna points are 34. This shows adamant, egoistic and dominatingcharacter.2. Ve-Su distance is >43 degrees. Ve is also the 6th lord.3. Ve/Ma is in 5:9 position, Mo/Sa is in 2:12 position, Ju/Me is in1:7 position.4. Ve is also in krittika Nks.5. There are blessings in the chart with Ve/Sa in 5:9 in D1 & D96. Sa aspects Mo in D9.7. Sa is conjunct Ve in D9.This chart has blessings of elders.LoA=Me; LoB= Ma; LoC=Ju; LoD= Su; LoE=Ma1. Sa aspects LoA, and is conjunct LoB and LoC – so there is Sa delay.2. Ju aspects LoA, and conjunct LoB – so there is Ju delay too.3. There are no zeroes in the chart.Of course with Ju is aspecting Sa but Sa is also with 6th lord Ve in D9.Full delay of Sa ends when Sa enters cancer in june 2005. At that timeJu is in Virgo after completing 2 rounds and aspecting 7th lord. InOct 2005 it enters Libra, but though it is aspecting LL Ve, it willnot rectify the mistakes in the chart. In Nov 2006, Ju entered Scorpio which is the 7th house from where Juis also aspecting Asc. Therefore both Ve-Su distance and Ve inkrittika can be said to be rectified.Next when Ju enters Sagittarius in Dec 2007 then he was running SaAD[July 2006 – Sept 2009]. So since she has given me the month as January 21. I think the yearwould have been 2007.ThanksPrabhaastrologyandtiminge vents@ s.com, "prabha.acharya"<prabha.acharya@ ...> wrote:>> Respected Guruji, Ash ji and List Members> This chart was given to me by one of my friends as a quiz. She just> gave me the hint that the marriage was on January 21. She didn't> divulge the year. As soon as I get the details I will post them.> So now work with that hint on both the charts. > I think as Anupji has said Ju aspecting Ve doesn't repair the spoils> of Ve [like Ve-Su distance and Ve in Krittika, Ve aspected by Sa] but> those mistakes can be rectified for timing by Transit Ju when it> aspects Lagna/Lagna Lord/7th House/7th Lord.> That is my understanding. > Thanks> Prabha> astrologyandtiminge vents@ s.com, "prabha.acharya"> <prabha.acharya@ > wrote:> >> > Respected Guruji, Ashji, and List Members,> > This is a chart of an unhappy marriage. According to the lady her> > husband is under his mother's control> > Husband: 27/3/1980, 8.20am, Howrah 22N35, 88E13> > Wife: 15/2/1983, 6.10pm, Kolkatta, 22N34, 88E22> > > > Thanks> > Prabha> >> Add more friends to your messenger and enjoy! Invite them now. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 9, 2009 Report Share Posted February 9, 2009 Dear Ramesh ji, I have not mentioned that Ju, Mo and Ma are in HoD. I have only mentioned that all of these planets are eager to give result. LoD is Ma, LoE is Mo and Ju in HoD with 7 points - Therefore these three planets are eager to give result. I hope I have made myself clear. Thanks Prabha , ramesh mishra <aarceemastro2002 wrote: > > Dear Anup Ji, Prabha Ji and group > I could not understand how Prabha Ji is getting Asc. as 10 Le 59 whereas I am getting it 12 Le 48.We have same program then asc.rising should also be equal. > Second point as stated by Prabha Ji is that she mentioned Ju, Mo and Ma in house of D but I am getting quite a different picture. Ju is in D house for 7th and Ma is in 7th and Mo is in 8th house. > Therefore this chart has confused me.Either my casting is wrong or Prabha Ji has made a mistake somewhere. > According to my chart > There is full delay by Sa and no delay by Ju. > If you go as per KAS this chart shows a harmonious relationship. > But if you see the quality of chart for marriage then presence of Su and Ma in 7th house is not good with Ve. > Ve being NK is afflicted by Su and Ma in rasi and navamsa.There is added affliction to Ve by Ra and Ke in D9. > Me being LoA and LoC for 7th is in black hole thereby reducing the strength of house A and house C. > One more point is to be noted that Me being LoC is in 8th place from its ownership.Thus her house C has become weak. > Blessings are present in this chart also like the chart of her husband. > See the difference of these two charts. In her husband chart Ju was mitigating the afflictions of Ve but in this chart there is nothing like that. > So if you consider the blessings then marriage could have been during Ju antra period from Sep 2001 to Apr 2004. Ju is weak in 5th house. > So unless we assure the correct birth time it is useless to devote the time in such type of chart. > Though we know the approximate date of marriage somehow we try to proof the event within the KAS framework > Thanks and regards. > Ramesh Mishra > rcmastro > > --- On Tue, 10/2/09, prabha.acharya <prabha.acharya wrote: > > prabha.acharya <prabha.acharya > Re: A chart > > Tuesday, 10 February, 2009, 9:58 AM Respected Guruji, Ashji and List Members, > Here is my analysis of the charts of the couple > ************ ********* ********* ********* ********* ********* > I will attempt the wife's chart. I get Asc as 10Le59. > The points I saw in the chart are: > 1.Lagna points are 32 and 7th house points are 18. So she looks like > adamant, egoistic and dominating character. > 2. Ve the NK is in Ra/Ke axis in D9 and is with Ma both in D1 & D9. > 3. LL /7L are in 5:9 position, Mo lord/7th lord from Mo are in 3:11 > position, Su lord/7L are in 5:9 position. > 4. From Ve and Ma also the 7th lord are in 5:9 position. > 5. In D9 the LL [Mo] and 9th lord [Ju] are in 5:9 position. > 6. Ma and Ve are conjunct > Though she has a dominating nature the marriage and difference between > Lagna and 7th house is more but marriage happened as the native has > elders blessings. > > LoA=Me; LoB=Sa; LoC= Me; LoD=Ma; LoE=Mo > 1.Me as LoA is in 6th house, aspected by 6th lord Sa in D9, 6th lord > Ju [of D9] is aspecting Me and therefore Me is spoiled. > 2. RK Ma is in Ra/Ke axis in D9. > > For timing; > 1. Sa is LoB and aspects LoA, LoC : so full delay by Sa. > 2. There is no Ju delay. > 3. There are no zeroes. > Full delay of Sa would have ended when Sa enters Virgo. There are > blessings in the chart. > Mo, Ma, Ju in HoD [with 7points] are eager to give results. > So approximately when she turns 25 years [i don't know in case of > blessings how many years can be reduced] she was running Ke AD [sept. > 2006-Sept 2007]. Ke is SD to Ju. > ************ ********* ********* ********* ********* **** > I got Asc as 3Tau30 for the husband's chart > The points I saw in the chart are: > 1. Lagna points are 34. This shows adamant, egoistic and dominating > character. > 2. Ve-Su distance is >43 degrees. Ve is also the 6th lord. > 3. Ve/Ma is in 5:9 position, Mo/Sa is in 2:12 position, Ju/Me is in > 1:7 position. > 4. Ve is also in krittika Nks. > 5. There are blessings in the chart with Ve/Sa in 5:9 in D1 & D9 > 6. Sa aspects Mo in D9. > 7. Sa is conjunct Ve in D9. > This chart has blessings of elders. > > LoA=Me; LoB= Ma; LoC=Ju; LoD= Su; LoE=Ma > 1. Sa aspects LoA, and is conjunct LoB and LoC †" so there is Sa delay. > 2. Ju aspects LoA, and conjunct LoB †" so there is Ju delay too. > 3. There are no zeroes in the chart. > Of course with Ju is aspecting Sa but Sa is also with 6th lord Ve in D9. > Full delay of Sa ends when Sa enters cancer in june 2005. At that time > Ju is in Virgo after completing 2 rounds and aspecting 7th lord. In > Oct 2005 it enters Libra, but though it is aspecting LL Ve, it will > not rectify the mistakes in the chart. > In Nov 2006, Ju entered Scorpio which is the 7th house from where Ju > is also aspecting Asc. Therefore both Ve-Su distance and Ve in > krittika can be said to be rectified. > Next when Ju enters Sagittarius in Dec 2007 then he was running Sa > AD[July 2006 †" Sept 2009]. > So since she has given me the month as January 21. I think the year > would have been 2007. > > Thanks > Prabha > astrologyandtiminge vents@ s.com, " prabha.acharya " > <prabha.acharya@ ...> wrote: > > > > Respected Guruji, Ash ji and List Members > > This chart was given to me by one of my friends as a quiz. She just > > gave me the hint that the marriage was on January 21. She didn't > > divulge the year. As soon as I get the details I will post them. > > So now work with that hint on both the charts. > > I think as Anupji has said Ju aspecting Ve doesn't repair the spoils > > of Ve [like Ve-Su distance and Ve in Krittika, Ve aspected by Sa] but > > those mistakes can be rectified for timing by Transit Ju when it > > aspects Lagna/Lagna Lord/7th House/7th Lord. > > That is my understanding. > > Thanks > > Prabha > > astrologyandtiminge vents@ s.com, " prabha.acharya " > > <prabha.acharya@ > wrote: > > > > > > Respected Guruji, Ashji, and List Members, > > > This is a chart of an unhappy marriage. According to the lady her > > > husband is under his mother's control > > > Husband: 27/3/1980, 8.20am, Howrah 22N35, 88E13 > > > Wife: 15/2/1983, 6.10pm, Kolkatta, 22N34, 88E22 > > > > > > Thanks > > > Prabha > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Add more friends to your messenger and enjoy! Go to http://messenger./invite/ > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 10, 2009 Report Share Posted February 10, 2009 Dear Prabha Ji,If you read your mail you may find that you have written,"Mo, Ma, Ju in HoD [with 7points] are eager to give results"May be a grammatical mistake but I thought it in other way.However it is OK now.Can you post few past events concerned with this couple ?.ThanksRamesh Mishrarcmastro--- On Tue, 10/2/09, prabha.acharya <prabha.acharya wrote:prabha.acharya <prabha.acharya Re: A chart Date: Tuesday, 10 February, 2009, 11:55 AM Dear Ramesh ji, I have not mentioned that Ju, Mo and Ma are in HoD. I have only mentioned that all of these planets are eager to give result. LoD is Ma, LoE is Mo and Ju in HoD with 7 points - Therefore these three planets are eager to give result. I hope I have made myself clear. Thanks Prabha astrologyandtiminge vents@ s.com, ramesh mishra <aarceemastro2002@ ...> wrote: > > Dear Anup Ji, Prabha Ji and group > I could not understand how Prabha Ji is getting Asc. as 10 Le 59 whereas I am getting it 12 Le 48.We have same program then asc.rising should also be equal. > Second point as stated by Prabha Ji is that she mentioned Ju, Mo and Ma in house of D but I am getting quite a different picture. Ju is in D house for 7th and Ma is in 7th and Mo is in 8th house. > Therefore this chart has confused me.Either my casting is wrong or Prabha Ji has made a mistake somewhere. > According to my chart > There is full delay by Sa and no delay by Ju. > If you go as per KAS this chart shows a harmonious relationship. > But if you see the quality of chart for marriage then presence of Su and Ma in 7th house is not good with Ve. > Ve being NK is afflicted by Su and Ma in rasi and navamsa.There is added affliction to Ve by Ra and Ke in D9. > Me being LoA and LoC for 7th is in black hole thereby reducing the strength of house A and house C. > One more point is to be noted that Me being LoC is in 8th place from its ownership.Thus her house C has become weak. > Blessings are present in this chart also like the chart of her husband. > See the difference of these two charts. In her husband chart Ju was mitigating the afflictions of Ve but in this chart there is nothing like that. > So if you consider the blessings then marriage could have been during Ju antra period from Sep 2001 to Apr 2004. Ju is weak in 5th house. > So unless we assure the correct birth time it is useless to devote the time in such type of chart. > Though we know the approximate date of marriage somehow we try to proof the event within the KAS framework > Thanks and regards. > Ramesh Mishra > rcmastro > > --- On Tue, 10/2/09, prabha.acharya <prabha.acharya@ ...> wrote: > > prabha.acharya <prabha.acharya@ ...> > [astrologyandtiming events] Re: A chart > astrologyandtiminge vents@ s.com > Tuesday, 10 February, 2009, 9:58 AM > > > > > > > Respected Guruji, Ashji and List Members, > Here is my analysis of the charts of the couple > ************ ********* ********* ********* ********* ********* > I will attempt the wife's chart. I get Asc as 10Le59. > The points I saw in the chart are: > 1.Lagna points are 32 and 7th house points are 18. So she looks like > adamant, egoistic and dominating character. > 2. Ve the NK is in Ra/Ke axis in D9 and is with Ma both in D1 & D9. > 3. LL /7L are in 5:9 position, Mo lord/7th lord from Mo are in 3:11 > position, Su lord/7L are in 5:9 position. > 4. From Ve and Ma also the 7th lord are in 5:9 position. > 5. In D9 the LL [Mo] and 9th lord [Ju] are in 5:9 position. > 6. Ma and Ve are conjunct > Though she has a dominating nature the marriage and difference between > Lagna and 7th house is more but marriage happened as the native has > elders blessings. > > LoA=Me; LoB=Sa; LoC= Me; LoD=Ma; LoE=Mo > 1.Me as LoA is in 6th house, aspected by 6th lord Sa in D9, 6th lord > Ju [of D9] is aspecting Me and therefore Me is spoiled. > 2. RK Ma is in Ra/Ke axis in D9. > > For timing; > 1. Sa is LoB and aspects LoA, LoC : so full delay by Sa. > 2. There is no Ju delay. > 3. There are no zeroes. > Full delay of Sa would have ended when Sa enters Virgo. There are > blessings in the chart. > Mo, Ma, Ju in HoD [with 7points] are eager to give results. > So approximately when she turns 25 years [i don't know in case of > blessings how many years can be reduced] she was running Ke AD [sept. > 2006-Sept 2007]. Ke is SD to Ju. > ************ ********* ********* ********* ********* **** > I got Asc as 3Tau30 for the husband's chart > The points I saw in the chart are: > 1. Lagna points are 34. This shows adamant, egoistic and dominating > character. > 2. Ve-Su distance is >43 degrees. Ve is also the 6th lord. > 3. Ve/Ma is in 5:9 position, Mo/Sa is in 2:12 position, Ju/Me is in > 1:7 position. > 4. Ve is also in krittika Nks. > 5. There are blessings in the chart with Ve/Sa in 5:9 in D1 & D9 > 6. Sa aspects Mo in D9. > 7. Sa is conjunct Ve in D9. > This chart has blessings of elders. > > LoA=Me; LoB= Ma; LoC=Ju; LoD= Su; LoE=Ma > 1. Sa aspects LoA, and is conjunct LoB and LoC â€" so there is Sa delay. > 2. Ju aspects LoA, and conjunct LoB â€" so there is Ju delay too. > 3. There are no zeroes in the chart. > Of course with Ju is aspecting Sa but Sa is also with 6th lord Ve in D9. > Full delay of Sa ends when Sa enters cancer in june 2005. At that time > Ju is in Virgo after completing 2 rounds and aspecting 7th lord. In > Oct 2005 it enters Libra, but though it is aspecting LL Ve, it will > not rectify the mistakes in the chart. > In Nov 2006, Ju entered Scorpio which is the 7th house from where Ju > is also aspecting Asc. Therefore both Ve-Su distance and Ve in > krittika can be said to be rectified. > Next when Ju enters Sagittarius in Dec 2007 then he was running Sa > AD[July 2006 â€" Sept 2009]. > So since she has given me the month as January 21. I think the year > would have been 2007. > > Thanks > Prabha > astrologyandtiminge vents@ s.com, "prabha.acharya" > <prabha.acharya@ ...> wrote: > > > > Respected Guruji, Ash ji and List Members > > This chart was given to me by one of my friends as a quiz. She just > > gave me the hint that the marriage was on January 21. She didn't > > divulge the year. As soon as I get the details I will post them. > > So now work with that hint on both the charts. > > I think as Anupji has said Ju aspecting Ve doesn't repair the spoils > > of Ve [like Ve-Su distance and Ve in Krittika, Ve aspected by Sa] but > > those mistakes can be rectified for timing by Transit Ju when it > > aspects Lagna/Lagna Lord/7th House/7th Lord. > > That is my understanding. > > Thanks > > Prabha > > astrologyandtiminge vents@ s.com, "prabha.acharya" > > <prabha.acharya@ > wrote: > > > > > > Respected Guruji, Ashji, and List Members, > > > This is a chart of an unhappy marriage. According to the lady her > > > husband is under his mother's control > > > Husband: 27/3/1980, 8.20am, Howrah 22N35, 88E13 > > > Wife: 15/2/1983, 6.10pm, Kolkatta, 22N34, 88E22 > > > > > > Thanks > > > Prabha > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Add more friends to your messenger and enjoy! Go to http://messenger. / invite/ > Add more friends to your messenger and enjoy! Invite them now. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 12, 2009 Report Share Posted February 12, 2009 Respected Guruji, Ashji and List Members, My friend has given the Date of marriage as 21st January 2005. Thanks prabha , " prabha.acharya " <prabha.acharya wrote: > > Respected Guruji, Ash ji and List Members > This chart was given to me by one of my friends as a quiz. She just > gave me the hint that the marriage was on January 21. She didn't > divulge the year. As soon as I get the details I will post them. > So now work with that hint on both the charts. > I think as Anupji has said Ju aspecting Ve doesn't repair the spoils > of Ve [like Ve-Su distance and Ve in Krittika, Ve aspected by Sa] but > those mistakes can be rectified for timing by Transit Ju when it > aspects Lagna/Lagna Lord/7th House/7th Lord. > That is my understanding. > Thanks > Prabha > , " prabha.acharya " > <prabha.acharya@> wrote: > > > > Respected Guruji, Ashji, and List Members, > > This is a chart of an unhappy marriage. According to the lady her > > husband is under his mother's control > > Husband: 27/3/1980, 8.20am, Howrah 22N35, 88E13 > > Wife: 15/2/1983, 6.10pm, Kolkatta, 22N34, 88E22 > > > > Thanks > > Prabha > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.