Ayanamsha difference in charts --answer

[Guest guest]

Hi Virendra;

 

Probably you have answered by manuji ... you need to go some what

deeper that takes its own time.....but good question......

Let me answer in different way.....

All planets are moving in sky and there is no physical partition for

zodiac so Logical partition has been created that are going to be used

as REFERENCE for calculation.

There are number of system can be created which use there own reference

and method for prediction...depends on exercise and surrounding

environment to get accuracy

------------------

Regards,

Devisingh

 

virendra25bangalore wrote:

 

 

Gentlemen/Ladies,

 

I was reading lesson 07 - Krushna's planetary strengths worksheet at http://krushna.sageasita.com/.

 

Illustration chart's data is :

"Birth data: Female, April 10, 1966; 12:08pm; 19N36, 77E40; Time zone

5:30

Use Ayanamsha 22:22:16; (Mean Nodes); Krushna Ayanamsha Diff; 01:00:24."

 

The Lesson further describes a mercury sub-period for the native

ranging from Dec 17, 1989 to Nov 27, 1992.

 

While I used KAS2006v3.3 to erect the chart I got this sub-period

ranging from Feb 02, 1990 to Dec 03, 1992. The Ayanamsha mentioned in

the chart is 22:29:39 which is correct per the KAS ayanamsha formula

given in lesson 6.

 

Adding to it, another software which uses Lahiri ayanamsha shows the

sub-period as March 30, 1991 to Jan 28, 1994.

 

Please help to understand how I'm supposed to work it out.

What is this Krushna Ayanamsha Diff 01:00:24 used in the lesson?

Which of these varying dashas was correct and why?

 

Kindly call me Virendra, I've seen people calling me "Virendra Ji" here

I'm just a 25 yr old boy beginning in Vedic Astrology.

 

Thanks & Regards,

Virendra