Guest guest Posted December 29, 2009 Report Share Posted December 29, 2009 Dear All, Below are details of Male native. DOB:11 August 1978 TOB:20:13:00 (Friday) 25N45 84E10 Asc:29Aq45 --Father expired on 17 Mar 1991 --Bsc on april 1998 --Msc on april 2000 --Bed on april 2002 --working as Teacher Government JOB --Father was too teacher in Government JOB. Can anybody solved this chart and find correct Date of marriage? Does marriage promise/not promiss? What was/will Date of marriage? P.S.Ascedence seems ok to me as that was seems correct matching more events. ------------------ Regards, Devisingh Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 30, 2009 Report Share Posted December 30, 2009 Dear Devi singh ji and group, Could you please write us when this person got his job. Was this somewhere in the year 2003-2004? For marriage,considering FK and NRK Ju is spoilt being in 6th house, Ve which is NK,FRK and LoD is in 6th house.Ve is also in nakshtra of 6th lord Mo though Mo is not considered as 6th lord. Further Su-Ve at distance of 45 Deg,Ve and Ma are together in rasi as well as in navasa with Mo.Sa as LoE is spoiled as Sa is in 8th house from 12th and also in leo sign whereas Su as 7th lord is in 6th house. So...quality of marriage ? Coming to delay factor there is Ju delay too. Again there is a zero in 8th house by Sa adding for delay. After getting job,which seems to be arround in 2003 onward,its Ma antra. Ma aspect house A and C.Ju aspects house A too for 7th. I am leaving here for members to work out for this marriage event if they think marriage is feasible. Regards Anup --- On Wed, 30/12/09, devisigh <devisingh.rajput wrote: devisigh <devisingh.rajput Date of Marriage Date: Wednesday, 30 December, 2009, 12:25 PM Dear All,Below are details of Male native.DOB:11 August 1978TOB:20:13:00 (Friday)25N4584E10Asc:29Aq45--Father expired on 17 Mar 1991--Bsc on april 1998--Msc on april 2000--Bed on april 2002--working as Teacher Government JOB--Father was too teacher in Government JOB.Can anybody solved this chart and find correct Date of marriage?Does marriage promise/not promiss?What was/will Date of marriage?P.S.Ascedence seems ok to me as that was seems correct matching more events.------------ ------Regards,Devisingh The INTERNET now has a personality. YOURS! See your Homepage. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 30, 2009 Report Share Posted December 30, 2009 Can you confirm that she is not married yet? Nir. , devisigh <devisingh.rajput wrote: > > Dear All, > > Below are details of Male native. > > DOB:11 August 1978 > TOB:20:13:00 (Friday) > 25N45 > 84E10 > Asc:29Aq45 > > --Father expired on 17 Mar 1991 > --Bsc on april 1998 > --Msc on april 2000 > --Bed on april 2002 > --working as Teacher Government JOB > --Father was too teacher in Government JOB. > > Can anybody solved this chart and find correct Date of marriage? > Does marriage promise/not promiss? > What was/will Date of marriage? > > P.S.Ascedence seems ok to me as that was seems correct matching more events. > ------------------ > Regards, > Devisingh > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 5, 2010 Report Share Posted January 5, 2010 Dear Anup JI, Thanks for your input...... Actually i was looking for Any input from all that can say marriage can happen..... --Below mentioned observation i have found in another chart too which did not get married, children seems good and also no indication for No-Marriage as per Chapter 24 but may overlooked something will search and post that chart too I again read chapter 24 and Finally i am able to convince my self with first questions 'Why he had Get Married' using below points .............Please correct/add your points in my observations --Ve is Strong for All house or atleast not bad for any house --Ve points are present for 1st and 7th house --Does not match much criteria for non-marital status Chapter 24 --Mo is at good position in chart (have Benific sight of St )........i am not sure this can count too? However i have tried to rectify chart and if i take time 20.00 pm that change Navamsa Asc --Quality worst from both times --Above time change Navamsa but not sure does that goes like that? Can anybody find out Probable Date or Month for Marriage i will let you know Later the Results.? ------------------ Regards, Devisingh Anup. M wrote:  Dear Devi singh ji and group,   Could you please write us when this person got his job. Was this somewhere in the year 2003-2004?   For marriage,considering FK and NRK Ju is spoilt being in 6th house, Ve which is NK,FRK and LoD is in 6th house.Ve is also in nakshtra of 6th lord Mo though Mo is not considered as 6th lord.  Further Su-Ve at distance of 45 Deg,Ve and Ma are together in rasi as well as in navasa with Mo.Sa as LoE is spoiled as Sa is in 8th house from 12th and also in leo sign whereas Su as 7th lord is in 6th house.  So...quality of marriage ?    Coming to delay factor there is Ju delay too. Again there is a zero in 8th house by Sa adding for delay.   After getting job,which seems to be arround in 2003 onward,its Ma antra. Ma aspect house A and C.Ju aspects house A too for 7th.   I am leaving here for members to work out for this marriage event if they think marriage is feasible.   Regards Anup          --- On Wed, 30/12/09, devisigh <devisingh.rajput > wrote: devisigh <devisingh.rajput > Date of Marriage Wednesday, 30 December, 2009, 12:25 PM  Dear All, Below are details of Male native. DOB:11 August 1978 TOB:20:13:00 (Friday) 25N45 84E10 Asc:29Aq45 --Father expired on 17 Mar 1991 --Bsc on april 1998 --Msc on april 2000 --Bed on april 2002 --working as Teacher Government JOB --Father was too teacher in Government JOB. Can anybody solved this chart and find correct Date of marriage? Does marriage promise/not promiss? What was/will Date of marriage? P.S.Ascedence seems ok to me as that was seems correct matching more events. ------------ ------ Regards, Devisingh The INTERNET now has a personality. YOURS! See your Homepage. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 5, 2010 Report Share Posted January 5, 2010 Dear Devi singh ji, Leaving rectification aside what i mean to say is overall quality of marriage is quite poor.We say that quality and timings are two different aspects.Thats why we assess the quality of karak and mool karak first and then of LoD and LoE.So if these all are spoiled,we have to judge the psychology as well as enviroment and then nature of the person from divisonals, This can lead us to tendency of the event if still something is left over. Thus its not a one liner job to fix the event whereas you can find many charts as you wrote where you can lost in oblivion for nothing. I hope you are getting me. Like in this chart,you tried to rectify the time but still not getting any satisfatory answer from yourself. Here moon is itself is a 6th lord and Ju in moon navamsa. Coming antras are Ma,Ra and Ju where as Ma and Ju aspect house A. Now these all antras are folloiwng after Ju delay.Ma is strong with 24 points in 7th house.We do not consider sight of such planet on house A,B,or C. Ra is SD to Sa and Sa is LoE here.These antras are eligible no doubt. I expect members to share what do they think about this chart without any sort of time rectification. Regards Anup --- On Tue, 5/1/10, devisigh <devisingh.rajput wrote: devisigh <devisingh.rajputRe: Date of Marriage Date: Tuesday, 5 January, 2010, 2:18 PM Dear Anup JI,Thanks for your input......Actually i was looking for Any input from all that can say marriage can happen..... --Below mentioned observation i have found in another chart too which did not get married, children seems good and also no indication for No-Marriage as per Chapter 24 but may overlooked something will search and post that chart tooI again read chapter 24 and Finally i am able to convince my self with first questions 'Why he had Get Married' using below points ............ Please correct/add your points in my observations--Ve is Strong for All house or atleast not bad for any house--Ve points are present for 1st and 7th house--Does not match much criteria for non-marital status Chapter 24--Mo is at good position in chart (have Benific sight of St )........i am not sure this can count too?However i have tried to rectify chart and if i take time 20.00 pm that change Navamsa Asc--Quality worst from both times --Above time change Navamsa but not sure does that goes like that?Can anybody find out Probable Date or Month for Marriage i will let you know Later the Results.?------------ ------ Regards, DevisinghAnup. M wrote: Dear Devi singh ji and group, Could you please write us when this person got his job. Was this somewhere in the year 2003-2004? For marriage,considerin g FK and NRK Ju is spoilt being in 6th house, Ve which is NK,FRK and LoD is in 6th house.Ve is also in nakshtra of 6th lord Mo though Mo is not considered as 6th lord. Further Su-Ve at distance of 45 Deg,Ve and Ma are together in rasi as well as in navasa with Mo.Sa as LoE is spoiled as Sa is in 8th house from 12th and also in leo sign whereas Su as 7th lord is in 6th house. So...quality of marriage ? Coming to delay factor there is Ju delay too. Again there is a zero in 8th house by Sa adding for delay. After getting job,which seems to be arround in 2003 onward,its Ma antra. Ma aspect house A and C.Ju aspects house A too for 7th. I am leaving here for members to work out for this marriage event if they think marriage is feasible. Regards Anup --- On Wed, 30/12/09, devisigh <devisingh.rajput@ gmail.com> wrote: devisigh <devisingh.rajput@ gmail.com>[astrologyandtiming events] Date of Marriageastrologyandtiminge vents@ s.comWednesday, 30 December, 2009, 12:25 PM Dear All,Below are details of Male native.DOB:11 August 1978TOB:20:13:00 (Friday)25N4584E10Asc:29Aq45--Father expired on 17 Mar 1991--Bsc on april 1998--Msc on april 2000--Bed on april 2002--working as Teacher Government JOB--Father was too teacher in Government JOB.Can anybody solved this chart and find correct Date of marriage?Does marriage promise/not promiss?What was/will Date of marriage?P.S.Ascedence seems ok to me as that was seems correct matching more events.------------ ------Regards,Devisingh The INTERNET now has a personality. YOURS! See your Homepage. The INTERNET now has a personality. YOURS! See your Homepage. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 9, 2010 Report Share Posted January 9, 2010 Dear All, Please provide your attempt for timing 'Marriage Event' for this native using KAS. --I am able to collect some more event for native, please ask if you required so. ------------------ Regards, Devisingh Anup. M wrote:  Dear Devi singh ji,    Leaving rectification aside what i mean to say is overall quality of marriage is quite poor.We say that quality and timings are two different aspects.Thats why we assess the quality of karak and mool karak first and then of LoD and LoE.So if these all are spoiled,we have to judge the psychology as well as enviroment and then nature of the person from divisonals, This can lead us to tendency of the event if still something is left over.   Thus its not a one liner job to fix the event whereas you can find many charts as you wrote where you can lost in oblivion for nothing.  I hope you are getting me.   Like in this chart,you tried to rectify the time but still not getting any satisfatory answer from yourself.   Here moon is itself is a 6th lord and Ju in moon navamsa. Coming antras are Ma,Ra and Ju where as Ma and Ju aspect house A.   Now these all antras are folloiwng after Ju delay.Ma is strong with 24 points in 7th house.We do not consider sight of such planet on house A,B,or C. Ra is SD to Sa and Sa is LoE here.These antras are eligible no doubt.   I expect members to share what do they think about this chart without any sort of time rectification.    Regards Anup        --- On Tue, 5/1/10, devisigh <devisingh.rajput > wrote: devisigh <devisingh.rajput > Re: Date of Marriage Tuesday, 5 January, 2010, 2:18 PM  Dear Anup JI, Thanks for your input...... Actually i was looking for Any input from all that can say marriage can happen..... --Below mentioned observation i have found in another chart too which did not get married, children seems good and also no indication for No-Marriage as per Chapter 24 but may overlooked something will search and post that chart too I again read chapter 24 and Finally i am able to convince my self with first questions 'Why he had Get Married' using below points ............. Please correct/add your points in my observations --Ve is Strong for All house or atleast not bad for any house --Ve points are present for 1st and 7th house --Does not match much criteria for non-marital status Chapter 24 --Mo is at good position in chart (have Benific sight of St )........i am not sure this can count too? However i have tried to rectify chart and if i take time 20.00 pm that change Navamsa Asc --Quality worst from both times --Above time change Navamsa but not sure does that goes like that? Can anybody find out Probable Date or Month for Marriage i will let you know Later the Results.? ------------ ------ Regards, Devisingh Anup. M wrote:  Dear Devi singh ji and group,   Could you please write us when this person got his job. Was this somewhere in the year 2003-2004?   For marriage,considerin g FK and NRK Ju is spoilt being in 6th house, Ve which is NK,FRK and LoD is in 6th house.Ve is also in nakshtra of 6th lord Mo though Mo is not considered as 6th lord.  Further Su-Ve at distance of 45 Deg,Ve and Ma are together in rasi as well as in navasa with Mo.Sa as LoE is spoiled as Sa is in 8th house from 12th and also in leo sign whereas Su as 7th lord is in 6th house.  So...quality of marriage ?    Coming to delay factor there is Ju delay too. Again there is a zero in 8th house by Sa adding for delay.   After getting job,which seems to be arround in 2003 onward,its Ma antra. Ma aspect house A and C.Ju aspects house A too for 7th.   I am leaving here for members to work out for this marriage event if they think marriage is feasible.   Regards Anup          --- On Wed, 30/12/09, devisigh <devisingh.rajput@ gmail.com> wrote: devisigh <devisingh.rajput@ gmail.com> [astrologyandtiming events] Date of Marriage astrologyandtiminge vents@ s.com Wednesday, 30 December, 2009, 12:25 PM  Dear All, Below are details of Male native. DOB:11 August 1978 TOB:20:13:00 (Friday) 25N45 84E10 Asc:29Aq45 --Father expired on 17 Mar 1991 --Bsc on april 1998 --Msc on april 2000 --Bed on april 2002 --working as Teacher Government JOB --Father was too teacher in Government JOB. Can anybody solved this chart and find correct Date of marriage? Does marriage promise/not promiss? What was/will Date of marriage? P.S.Ascedence seems ok to me as that was seems correct matching more events. ------------ ------ Regards, Devisingh The INTERNET now has a personality. YOURS! See your Homepage. The INTERNET now has a personality. YOURS! See your Homepage. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 19, 2010 Report Share Posted January 19, 2010 Dear All, Date of Marriage was 11/12/2009. ------------------ Regards, Devisingh devisigh wrote: Dear All, Please provide your attempt for timing 'Marriage Event' for this native using KAS. --I am able to collect some more event for native, please ask if you required so. ------------------ Regards, Devisingh Anup. M wrote:  Dear Devi singh ji,    Leaving rectification aside what i mean to say is overall quality of marriage is quite poor.We say that quality and timings are two different aspects.Thats why we assess the quality of karak and mool karak first and then of LoD and LoE.So if these all are spoiled,we have to judge the psychology as well as enviroment and then nature of the person from divisonals, This can lead us to tendency of the event if still something is left over.   Thus its not a one liner job to fix the event whereas you can find many charts as you wrote where you can lost in oblivion for nothing.  I hope you are getting me.   Like in this chart,you tried to rectify the time but still not getting any satisfatory answer from yourself.   Here moon is itself is a 6th lord and Ju in moon navamsa. Coming antras are Ma,Ra and Ju where as Ma and Ju aspect house A.   Now these all antras are folloiwng after Ju delay.Ma is strong with 24 points in 7th house.We do not consider sight of such planet on house A,B,or C. Ra is SD to Sa and Sa is LoE here.These antras are eligible no doubt.   I expect members to share what do they think about this chart without any sort of time rectification.    Regards Anup        --- On Tue, 5/1/10, devisigh <devisingh.rajput > wrote: devisigh <devisingh.rajput > Re: Date of Marriage Tuesday, 5 January, 2010, 2:18 PM  Dear Anup JI, Thanks for your input...... Actually i was looking for Any input from all that can say marriage can happen..... --Below mentioned observation i have found in another chart too which did not get married, children seems good and also no indication for No-Marriage as per Chapter 24 but may overlooked something will search and post that chart too I again read chapter 24 and Finally i am able to convince my self with first questions 'Why he had Get Married' using below points ............. Please correct/add your points in my observations --Ve is Strong for All house or atleast not bad for any house --Ve points are present for 1st and 7th house --Does not match much criteria for non-marital status Chapter 24 --Mo is at good position in chart (have Benific sight of St )........i am not sure this can count too? However i have tried to rectify chart and if i take time 20.00 pm that change Navamsa Asc --Quality worst from both times --Above time change Navamsa but not sure does that goes like that? Can anybody find out Probable Date or Month for Marriage i will let you know Later the Results.? ------------ ------ Regards, Devisingh Anup. M wrote:  Dear Devi singh ji and group,   Could you please write us when this person got his job. Was this somewhere in the year 2003-2004?   For marriage,considerin g FK and NRK Ju is spoilt being in 6th house, Ve which is NK,FRK and LoD is in 6th house.Ve is also in nakshtra of 6th lord Mo though Mo is not considered as 6th lord.  Further Su-Ve at distance of 45 Deg,Ve and Ma are together in rasi as well as in navasa with Mo.Sa as LoE is spoiled as Sa is in 8th house from 12th and also in leo sign whereas Su as 7th lord is in 6th house.  So...quality of marriage ?    Coming to delay factor there is Ju delay too. Again there is a zero in 8th house by Sa adding for delay.   After getting job,which seems to be arround in 2003 onward,its Ma antra. Ma aspect house A and C.Ju aspects house A too for 7th.   I am leaving here for members to work out for this marriage event if they think marriage is feasible.   Regards Anup          --- On Wed, 30/12/09, devisigh <devisingh.rajput@ gmail.com> wrote: devisigh <devisingh.rajput@ gmail.com> [astrologyandtiming events] Date of Marriage astrologyandtiminge vents@ s.com Wednesday, 30 December, 2009, 12:25 PM  Dear All, Below are details of Male native. DOB:11 August 1978 TOB:20:13:00 (Friday) 25N45 84E10 Asc:29Aq45 --Father expired on 17 Mar 1991 --Bsc on april 1998 --Msc on april 2000 --Bed on april 2002 --working as Teacher Government JOB --Father was too teacher in Government JOB. Can anybody solved this chart and find correct Date of marriage? Does marriage promise/not promiss? What was/will Date of marriage? P.S.Ascedence seems ok to me as that was seems correct matching more events. ------------ ------ Regards, Devisingh The INTERNET now has a personality. YOURS! See your Homepage. The INTERNET now has a personality. YOURS! See your Homepage. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 21, 2010 Report Share Posted January 21, 2010 Dear Devi singh ji and Group, Now devi singh ji has given the marriage date for this chart, members can analyse it with their own respective angle. Thatway it can give a lead where one can stuck or confuse. One should take it as part of our learning process while everyday we come across such charts. Regards Anup --- On Tue, 19/1/10, devisigh <devisingh.rajput wrote: devisigh <devisingh.rajputRe: Date of Marriage Date: Tuesday, 19 January, 2010, 2:07 PM Dear All,Date of Marriage was 11/12/2009.------------ ------ Regards, Devisinghdevisigh wrote: Dear All,Please provide your attempt for timing 'Marriage Event' for this native using KAS.--I am able to collect some more event for native, please ask if you required so.------------ ------ Regards, DevisinghAnup. M wrote: Dear Devi singh ji, Leaving rectification aside what i mean to say is overall quality of marriage is quite poor.We say that quality and timings are two different aspects. Thats why we assess the quality of karak and mool karak first and then of LoD and LoE.So if these all are spoiled,we have to judge the psychology as well as enviroment and then nature of the person from divisonals, This can lead us to tendency of the event if still something is left over. Thus its not a one liner job to fix the event whereas you can find many charts as you wrote where you can lost in oblivion for nothing. I hope you are getting me. Like in this chart,you tried to rectify the time but still not getting any satisfatory answer from yourself. Here moon is itself is a 6th lord and Ju in moon navamsa. Coming antras are Ma,Ra and Ju where as Ma and Ju aspect house A. Now these all antras are folloiwng after Ju delay.Ma is strong with 24 points in 7th house.We do not consider sight of such planet on house A,B,or C. Ra is SD to Sa and Sa is LoE here.These antras are eligible no doubt. I expect members to share what do they think about this chart without any sort of time rectification. Regards Anup --- On Tue, 5/1/10, devisigh <devisingh.rajput@ gmail.com> wrote: devisigh <devisingh.rajput@ gmail.com>Re: [astrologyandtiming events] Date of Marriageastrologyandtiminge vents@ s.comTuesday, 5 January, 2010, 2:18 PM Dear Anup JI,Thanks for your input......Actually i was looking for Any input from all that can say marriage can happen..... --Below mentioned observation i have found in another chart too which did not get married, children seems good and also no indication for No-Marriage as per Chapter 24 but may overlooked something will search and post that chart tooI again read chapter 24 and Finally i am able to convince my self with first questions 'Why he had Get Married' using below points ............ Please correct/add your points in my observations--Ve is Strong for All house or atleast not bad for any house--Ve points are present for 1st and 7th house--Does not match much criteria for non-marital status Chapter 24--Mo is at good position in chart (have Benific sight of St )........i am not sure this can count too?However i have tried to rectify chart and if i take time 20.00 pm that change Navamsa Asc--Quality worst from both times --Above time change Navamsa but not sure does that goes like that?Can anybody find out Probable Date or Month for Marriage i will let you know Later the Results.?------------ ------ Regards, DevisinghAnup. M wrote: Dear Devi singh ji and group, Could you please write us when this person got his job. Was this somewhere in the year 2003-2004? For marriage,considerin g FK and NRK Ju is spoilt being in 6th house, Ve which is NK,FRK and LoD is in 6th house.Ve is also in nakshtra of 6th lord Mo though Mo is not considered as 6th lord. Further Su-Ve at distance of 45 Deg,Ve and Ma are together in rasi as well as in navasa with Mo.Sa as LoE is spoiled as Sa is in 8th house from 12th and also in leo sign whereas Su as 7th lord is in 6th house. So...quality of marriage ? Coming to delay factor there is Ju delay too. Again there is a zero in 8th house by Sa adding for delay. After getting job,which seems to be arround in 2003 onward,its Ma antra. Ma aspect house A and C.Ju aspects house A too for 7th. I am leaving here for members to work out for this marriage event if they think marriage is feasible. Regards Anup --- On Wed, 30/12/09, devisigh <devisingh.rajput@ gmail.com> wrote: devisigh <devisingh.rajput@ gmail.com>[astrologyandtiming events] Date of Marriageastrologyandtiminge vents@ s.comWednesday, 30 December, 2009, 12:25 PM Dear All,Below are details of Male native.DOB:11 August 1978TOB:20:13:00 (Friday)25N4584E10Asc:29Aq45--Father expired on 17 Mar 1991--Bsc on april 1998--Msc on april 2000--Bed on april 2002--working as Teacher Government JOB--Father was too teacher in Government JOB.Can anybody solved this chart and find correct Date of marriage?Does marriage promise/not promiss?What was/will Date of marriage?P.S.Ascedence seems ok to me as that was seems correct matching more events.------------ ------Regards,Devisingh The INTERNET now has a personality. YOURS! See your Homepage. The INTERNET now has a personality. YOURS! See your Homepage. The INTERNET now has a personality. YOURS! See your Homepage. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 21, 2010 Report Share Posted January 21, 2010 Dear Anup JI, Thanks a lot for your email....i was about to post my analysis now (which i can also be posted before) but waited for group input to learn something from them on KAS. P.S.Interesting is that ..this i have solved before 7year without KAS...as it is live example where i have confused whether to rectify or not whether promise of marriage or not ....but now better for all my questions.......i have very much fundamental query but as as krushnaji told this group is for timing of event so will not disturb all from my query but will not leave query too.... ------------------ Regards, Devisingh Anup. M wrote:  Dear Devi singh ji and Group,   Now devi singh ji has given the marriage date for this chart, members can analyse it with their own respective angle.  Thatway it can give a lead where one can stuck or confuse. One should take it as part of our learning process while everyday we come across such charts.   Regards Anup          --- On Tue, 19/1/10, devisigh <devisingh.rajput > wrote: devisigh <devisingh.rajput > Re: Date of Marriage Tuesday, 19 January, 2010, 2:07 PM  Dear All, Date of Marriage was 11/12/2009. ------------ ------ Regards, Devisingh devisigh wrote: Dear All, Please provide your attempt for timing 'Marriage Event' for this native using KAS. --I am able to collect some more event for native, please ask if you required so. ------------ ------ Regards, Devisingh Anup. M wrote:  Dear Devi singh ji,    Leaving rectification aside what i mean to say is overall quality of marriage is quite poor.We say that quality and timings are two different aspects. Thats why we assess the quality of karak and mool karak first and then of LoD and LoE.So if these all are spoiled,we have to judge the psychology as well as enviroment and then nature of the person from divisonals, This can lead us to tendency of the event if still something is left over.   Thus its not a one liner job to fix the event whereas you can find many charts as you wrote where you can lost in oblivion for nothing.  I hope you are getting me.   Like in this chart,you tried to rectify the time but still not getting any satisfatory answer from yourself.   Here moon is itself is a 6th lord and Ju in moon navamsa. Coming antras are Ma,Ra and Ju where as Ma and Ju aspect house A.   Now these all antras are folloiwng after Ju delay.Ma is strong with 24 points in 7th house.We do not consider sight of such planet on house A,B,or C. Ra is SD to Sa and Sa is LoE here.These antras are eligible no doubt.   I expect members to share what do they think about this chart without any sort of time rectification.    Regards Anup        --- On Tue, 5/1/10, devisigh <devisingh.rajput@ gmail.com> wrote: devisigh <devisingh.rajput@ gmail.com> Re: [astrologyandtiming events] Date of Marriage astrologyandtiminge vents@ s.com Tuesday, 5 January, 2010, 2:18 PM  Dear Anup JI, Thanks for your input...... Actually i was looking for Any input from all that can say marriage can happen..... --Below mentioned observation i have found in another chart too which did not get married, children seems good and also no indication for No-Marriage as per Chapter 24 but may overlooked something will search and post that chart too I again read chapter 24 and Finally i am able to convince my self with first questions 'Why he had Get Married' using below points ............. Please correct/add your points in my observations --Ve is Strong for All house or atleast not bad for any house --Ve points are present for 1st and 7th house --Does not match much criteria for non-marital status Chapter 24 --Mo is at good position in chart (have Benific sight of St )........i am not sure this can count too? However i have tried to rectify chart and if i take time 20.00 pm that change Navamsa Asc --Quality worst from both times --Above time change Navamsa but not sure does that goes like that? Can anybody find out Probable Date or Month for Marriage i will let you know Later the Results.? ------------ ------ Regards, Devisingh Anup. M wrote:  Dear Devi singh ji and group,   Could you please write us when this person got his job. Was this somewhere in the year 2003-2004?   For marriage,considerin g FK and NRK Ju is spoilt being in 6th house, Ve which is NK,FRK and LoD is in 6th house.Ve is also in nakshtra of 6th lord Mo though Mo is not considered as 6th lord.  Further Su-Ve at distance of 45 Deg,Ve and Ma are together in rasi as well as in navasa with Mo.Sa as LoE is spoiled as Sa is in 8th house from 12th and also in leo sign whereas Su as 7th lord is in 6th house.  So...quality of marriage ?    Coming to delay factor there is Ju delay too. Again there is a zero in 8th house by Sa adding for delay.   After getting job,which seems to be arround in 2003 onward,its Ma antra. Ma aspect house A and C.Ju aspects house A too for 7th.   I am leaving here for members to work out for this marriage event if they think marriage is feasible.   Regards Anup          --- On Wed, 30/12/09, devisigh <devisingh.rajput@ gmail.com> wrote: devisigh <devisingh.rajput@ gmail.com> [astrologyandtiming events] Date of Marriage astrologyandtiminge vents@ s.com Wednesday, 30 December, 2009, 12:25 PM  Dear All, Below are details of Male native. DOB:11 August 1978 TOB:20:13:00 (Friday) 25N45 84E10 Asc:29Aq45 --Father expired on 17 Mar 1991 --Bsc on april 1998 --Msc on april 2000 --Bed on april 2002 --working as Teacher Government JOB --Father was too teacher in Government JOB. Can anybody solved this chart and find correct Date of marriage? Does marriage promise/not promiss? What was/will Date of marriage? P.S.Ascedence seems ok to me as that was seems correct matching more events. ------------ ------ Regards, Devisingh The INTERNET now has a personality. YOURS! See your Homepage. The INTERNET now has a personality. YOURS! See your Homepage. The INTERNET now has a personality. YOURS! See your Homepage. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 22, 2010 Report Share Posted January 22, 2010 Dear Devi singh ji, By posting your analysis,you can also learn few tips where you are confused. Lets hear your query,if any,related to KAS no matter it be related to timing,quality,upchaysthans,samdharmi,aspect,placement etc.. These 36 powerful lessons are not only 36 in numbers but you can multiply these with number of charts you have gone through and so like that. Do not keep upto you and come out with the doubts,if you have in your mind. Slowly you would be able to grasp the primary theory,applying it practically on various charts,drop any chart for a while,which deviate you from your understanding and pick that after you are confident. Every house in a chart is a part of timing,remember this, Regards Anup --- On Thu, 21/1/10, devisigh <devisingh.rajput wrote: devisigh <devisingh.rajputRe: Date of Marriage Date: Thursday, 21 January, 2010, 6:45 PM Dear Anup JI,Thanks a lot for your email....i was about to post my analysis now (which i can also be posted before) but waited for group input to learn something from them on KAS.P.S.Interesting is that ..this i have solved before 7year without KAS...as it is live example where i have confused whether to rectify or not whether promise of marriage or not ....but now better for all my questions... ....i have very much fundamental query but as as krushnaji told this group is for timing of event so will not disturb all from my query but will not leave query too....------------ ------ Regards, DevisinghAnup. M wrote: Dear Devi singh ji and Group, Now devi singh ji has given the marriage date for this chart, members can analyse it with their own respective angle. Thatway it can give a lead where one can stuck or confuse. One should take it as part of our learning process while everyday we come across such charts. Regards Anup --- On Tue, 19/1/10, devisigh <devisingh.rajput@ gmail.com> wrote: devisigh <devisingh.rajput@ gmail.com>Re: [astrologyandtiming events] Date of Marriageastrologyandtiminge vents@ s.comTuesday, 19 January, 2010, 2:07 PM Dear All,Date of Marriage was 11/12/2009.------------ ------ Regards, Devisinghdevisigh wrote: Dear All,Please provide your attempt for timing 'Marriage Event' for this native using KAS.--I am able to collect some more event for native, please ask if you required so.------------ ------ Regards, DevisinghAnup. M wrote: Dear Devi singh ji, Leaving rectification aside what i mean to say is overall quality of marriage is quite poor.We say that quality and timings are two different aspects. Thats why we assess the quality of karak and mool karak first and then of LoD and LoE.So if these all are spoiled,we have to judge the psychology as well as enviroment and then nature of the person from divisonals, This can lead us to tendency of the event if still something is left over. Thus its not a one liner job to fix the event whereas you can find many charts as you wrote where you can lost in oblivion for nothing. I hope you are getting me. Like in this chart,you tried to rectify the time but still not getting any satisfatory answer from yourself. Here moon is itself is a 6th lord and Ju in moon navamsa. Coming antras are Ma,Ra and Ju where as Ma and Ju aspect house A. Now these all antras are folloiwng after Ju delay.Ma is strong with 24 points in 7th house.We do not consider sight of such planet on house A,B,or C. Ra is SD to Sa and Sa is LoE here.These antras are eligible no doubt. I expect members to share what do they think about this chart without any sort of time rectification. Regards Anup --- On Tue, 5/1/10, devisigh <devisingh.rajput@ gmail.com> wrote: devisigh <devisingh.rajput@ gmail.com>Re: [astrologyandtiming events] Date of Marriageastrologyandtiminge vents@ s.comTuesday, 5 January, 2010, 2:18 PM Dear Anup JI,Thanks for your input......Actually i was looking for Any input from all that can say marriage can happen..... --Below mentioned observation i have found in another chart too which did not get married, children seems good and also no indication for No-Marriage as per Chapter 24 but may overlooked something will search and post that chart tooI again read chapter 24 and Finally i am able to convince my self with first questions 'Why he had Get Married' using below points ............ Please correct/add your points in my observations--Ve is Strong for All house or atleast not bad for any house--Ve points are present for 1st and 7th house--Does not match much criteria for non-marital status Chapter 24--Mo is at good position in chart (have Benific sight of St )........i am not sure this can count too?However i have tried to rectify chart and if i take time 20.00 pm that change Navamsa Asc--Quality worst from both times --Above time change Navamsa but not sure does that goes like that?Can anybody find out Probable Date or Month for Marriage i will let you know Later the Results.?------------ ------ Regards, DevisinghAnup. M wrote: Dear Devi singh ji and group, Could you please write us when this person got his job. Was this somewhere in the year 2003-2004? For marriage,considerin g FK and NRK Ju is spoilt being in 6th house, Ve which is NK,FRK and LoD is in 6th house.Ve is also in nakshtra of 6th lord Mo though Mo is not considered as 6th lord. Further Su-Ve at distance of 45 Deg,Ve and Ma are together in rasi as well as in navasa with Mo.Sa as LoE is spoiled as Sa is in 8th house from 12th and also in leo sign whereas Su as 7th lord is in 6th house. So...quality of marriage ? Coming to delay factor there is Ju delay too. Again there is a zero in 8th house by Sa adding for delay. After getting job,which seems to be arround in 2003 onward,its Ma antra. Ma aspect house A and C.Ju aspects house A too for 7th. I am leaving here for members to work out for this marriage event if they think marriage is feasible. Regards Anup --- On Wed, 30/12/09, devisigh <devisingh.rajput@ gmail.com> wrote: devisigh <devisingh.rajput@ gmail.com>[astrologyandtiming events] Date of Marriageastrologyandtiminge vents@ s.comWednesday, 30 December, 2009, 12:25 PM Dear All,Below are details of Male native.DOB:11 August 1978TOB:20:13:00 (Friday)25N4584E10Asc:29Aq45--Father expired on 17 Mar 1991--Bsc on april 1998--Msc on april 2000--Bed on april 2002--working as Teacher Government JOB--Father was too teacher in Government JOB.Can anybody solved this chart and find correct Date of marriage?Does marriage promise/not promiss?What was/will Date of marriage?P.S.Ascedence seems ok to me as that was seems correct matching more events.------------ ------Regards,Devisingh The INTERNET now has a personality. YOURS! See your Homepage. The INTERNET now has a personality. YOURS! See your Homepage. The INTERNET now has a personality. YOURS! See your Homepage. The INTERNET now has a personality. YOURS! See your Homepage. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 22, 2010 Report Share Posted January 22, 2010 Teacher do fail. Learner never fail. Learning is never completed or difficult. Learning is always possible irrespective of the rules                  On 1/21/10, devisigh <devisingh.rajput wrote:  Dear Anup JI,Thanks a lot for your email....i was about to post my analysis now (which i can also be posted before) but waited for group input to learn something from them on KAS.P.S.Interesting is that ..this i have solved before 7year without KAS...as it is live example where i have confused whether to rectify or not whether promise of marriage or not ....but now better for all my questions.......i have very much fundamental query but as as krushnaji told this group is for timing of event so will not disturb all from my query but will not leave query too.... ------------------ Regards, DevisinghAnup. M wrote:  Dear Devi singh ji and Group,   Now devi singh ji has given the marriage date for this chart, members can analyse it with their own respective angle.  Thatway it can give a lead where one can stuck or confuse. One should take it as part of our learning process while everyday we come across such charts.   Regards Anup          --- On Tue, 19/1/10, devisigh <devisingh.rajput wrote:  devisigh <devisingh.rajput Re: Date of Marriage Tuesday, 19 January, 2010, 2:07 PM  Dear All,Date of Marriage was 11/12/2009.------------ ------ Regards, Devisinghdevisigh wrote: Dear All,Please provide your attempt for timing 'Marriage Event' for this native using KAS.--I am able to collect some more event for native, please ask if you required so. ------------ ------ Regards, DevisinghAnup. M wrote:  Dear Devi singh ji,    Leaving rectification aside what i mean to say is overall quality of marriage is quite poor.We say that quality and timings are two different aspects. Thats why we assess the quality of karak and mool karak first and then of LoD and LoE.So if these all are spoiled,we have to judge the psychology as well as enviroment and then nature of the person from divisonals, This can lead us to tendency of the event if still something is left over.   Thus its not a one liner job to fix the event whereas you can find many charts as you wrote where you can lost in oblivion for nothing.  I hope you are getting me.   Like in this chart,you tried to rectify the time but still not getting any satisfatory answer from yourself.   Here moon is itself is a 6th lord and Ju in moon navamsa. Coming antras are Ma,Ra and Ju where as Ma and Ju aspect house A.   Now these all antras are folloiwng after Ju delay.Ma is strong with 24 points in 7th house.We do not consider sight of such planet on house A,B,or C. Ra is SD to Sa and Sa is LoE here.These antras are eligible no doubt.   I expect members to share what do they think about this chart without any sort of time rectification.    Regards Anup        --- On Tue, 5/1/10, devisigh <devisingh.rajput@ gmail.com> wrote: devisigh <devisingh.rajput@ gmail.com>Re: [astrologyandtiming events] Date of Marriage astrologyandtiminge vents@ s.comTuesday, 5 January, 2010, 2:18 PM  Dear Anup JI,Thanks for your input......Actually i was looking for Any input from all that can say marriage can happen..... --Below mentioned observation i have found in another chart too which did not get married, children seems good and also no indication for No-Marriage as per Chapter 24 but may overlooked something will search and post that chart too I again read chapter 24 and Finally i am able to convince my self with first questions 'Why he had Get Married' using below points ............ Please correct/add your points in my observations--Ve is Strong for All house or atleast not bad for any house --Ve points are present for 1st and 7th house--Does not match much criteria for non-marital status Chapter 24--Mo is at good position in chart (have Benific sight of St )........i am not sure this can count too? However i have tried to rectify chart and if i take time 20.00 pm that change Navamsa Asc--Quality worst from both times --Above time change Navamsa but not sure does that goes like that?Can anybody find out Probable Date or Month for Marriage i will let you know Later the Results.? ------------ ------ Regards, DevisinghAnup. M wrote:  Dear Devi singh ji and group,   Could you please write us when this person got his job. Was this somewhere in the year 2003-2004?   For marriage,considerin g FK and NRK Ju is spoilt being in 6th house, Ve which is NK,FRK and LoD is in 6th house.Ve is also in nakshtra of 6th lord Mo though Mo is not considered as 6th lord.  Further Su-Ve at distance of 45 Deg,Ve and Ma are together in rasi as well as in navasa with Mo.Sa as LoE is spoiled as Sa is in 8th house from 12th and also in leo sign whereas Su as 7th lord is in 6th house.  So...quality of marriage ?    Coming to delay factor there is Ju delay too. Again there is a zero in 8th house by Sa adding for delay.   After getting job,which seems to be arround in 2003 onward,its Ma antra. Ma aspect house A and C.Ju aspects house A too for 7th.   I am leaving here for members to work out for this marriage event if they think marriage is feasible.   Regards Anup          --- On Wed, 30/12/09, devisigh <devisingh.rajput@ gmail.com> wrote:  devisigh <devisingh.rajput@ gmail.com>[astrologyandtiming events] Date of Marriage astrologyandtiminge vents@ s.comWednesday, 30 December, 2009, 12:25 PM  Dear All,Below are details of Male native.DOB:11 August 1978TOB:20:13:00 (Friday)25N4584E10Asc:29Aq45--Father expired on 17 Mar 1991--Bsc on april 1998--Msc on april 2000 --Bed on april 2002--working as Teacher Government JOB--Father was too teacher in Government JOB.Can anybody solved this chart and find correct Date of marriage?Does marriage promise/not promiss?What was/will Date of marriage? P.S.Ascedence seems ok to me as that was seems correct matching more events.------------ ------Regards,Devisingh  The INTERNET now has a personality. YOURS! See your Homepage.   The INTERNET now has a personality. YOURS! See your Homepage.  The INTERNET now has a personality. YOURS! See your Homepage. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 25, 2010 Report Share Posted January 25, 2010 Dear Krushna, Great Words and message............. Teacher who 'teach' and outcome will be students........'guru' who never teach and outcome could be Gurus......... --I do have great respect for all please leave me on some occasion for my mistake will improve it take time..... ------------------ Regards, Devisingh krushana Jugal wrote:  Teacher do fail. Learner never fail. Learning is never completed or difficult. Learning is always possible irrespective of the rules                  On 1/21/10, devisigh <devisingh.rajput > wrote:  Dear Anup JI, Thanks a lot for your email....i was about to post my analysis now (which i can also be posted before) but waited for group input to learn something from them on KAS. P.S.Interesting is that ..this i have solved before 7year without KAS...as it is live example where i have confused whether to rectify or not whether promise of marriage or not ....but now better for all my questions.......i have very much fundamental query but as as krushnaji told this group is for timing of event so will not disturb all from my query but will not leave query too.... ------------------ Regards, Devisingh Anup. M wrote:  Dear Devi singh ji and Group,   Now devi singh ji has given the marriage date for this chart, members can analyse it with their own respective angle.  Thatway it can give a lead where one can stuck or confuse. One should take it as part of our learning process while everyday we come across such charts.   Regards Anup          --- On Tue, 19/1/10, devisigh <devisingh.rajput > wrote:  devisigh <devisingh.rajput > Re: Date of Marriage Tuesday, 19 January, 2010, 2:07 PM  Dear All, Date of Marriage was 11/12/2009. ------------ ------ Regards, Devisingh devisigh wrote: Dear All, Please provide your attempt for timing 'Marriage Event' for this native using KAS. --I am able to collect some more event for native, please ask if you required so. ------------ ------ Regards, Devisingh Anup. M wrote:  Dear Devi singh ji,    Leaving rectification aside what i mean to say is overall quality of marriage is quite poor.We say that quality and timings are two different aspects. Thats why we assess the quality of karak and mool karak first and then of LoD and LoE.So if these all are spoiled,we have to judge the psychology as well as enviroment and then nature of the person from divisonals, This can lead us to tendency of the event if still something is left over.   Thus its not a one liner job to fix the event whereas you can find many charts as you wrote where you can lost in oblivion for nothing.  I hope you are getting me.   Like in this chart,you tried to rectify the time but still not getting any satisfatory answer from yourself.   Here moon is itself is a 6th lord and Ju in moon navamsa. Coming antras are Ma,Ra and Ju where as Ma and Ju aspect house A.   Now these all antras are folloiwng after Ju delay.Ma is strong with 24 points in 7th house.We do not consider sight of such planet on house A,B,or C. Ra is SD to Sa and Sa is LoE here.These antras are eligible no doubt.   I expect members to share what do they think about this chart without any sort of time rectification.    Regards Anup        --- On Tue, 5/1/10, devisigh <devisingh.rajput@ gmail.com> wrote:  devisigh <devisingh.rajput@ gmail.com> Re: [astrologyandtiming events] Date of Marriage astrologyandtiminge vents@ s.com Tuesday, 5 January, 2010, 2:18 PM  Dear Anup JI, Thanks for your input...... Actually i was looking for Any input from all that can say marriage can happen..... --Below mentioned observation i have found in another chart too which did not get married, children seems good and also no indication for No-Marriage as per Chapter 24 but may overlooked something will search and post that chart too I again read chapter 24 and Finally i am able to convince my self with first questions 'Why he had Get Married' using below points ............. Please correct/add your points in my observations --Ve is Strong for All house or atleast not bad for any house --Ve points are present for 1st and 7th house --Does not match much criteria for non-marital status Chapter 24 --Mo is at good position in chart (have Benific sight of St )........i am not sure this can count too? However i have tried to rectify chart and if i take time 20.00 pm that change Navamsa Asc --Quality worst from both times --Above time change Navamsa but not sure does that goes like that? Can anybody find out Probable Date or Month for Marriage i will let you know Later the Results.? ------------ ------ Regards, Devisingh Anup. M wrote:  Dear Devi singh ji and group,   Could you please write us when this person got his job. Was this somewhere in the year 2003-2004?   For marriage,considerin g FK and NRK Ju is spoilt being in 6th house, Ve which is NK,FRK and LoD is in 6th house.Ve is also in nakshtra of 6th lord Mo though Mo is not considered as 6th lord.  Further Su-Ve at distance of 45 Deg,Ve and Ma are together in rasi as well as in navasa with Mo.Sa as LoE is spoiled as Sa is in 8th house from 12th and also in leo sign whereas Su as 7th lord is in 6th house.  So...quality of marriage ?    Coming to delay factor there is Ju delay too. Again there is a zero in 8th house by Sa adding for delay.   After getting job,which seems to be arround in 2003 onward,its Ma antra. Ma aspect house A and C.Ju aspects house A too for 7th.   I am leaving here for members to work out for this marriage event if they think marriage is feasible.   Regards Anup          --- On Wed, 30/12/09, devisigh <devisingh.rajput@ gmail.com> wrote:  devisigh <devisingh.rajput@ gmail.com> [astrologyandtiming events] Date of Marriage astrologyandtiminge vents@ s.com Wednesday, 30 December, 2009, 12:25 PM  Dear All, Below are details of Male native. DOB:11 August 1978 TOB:20:13:00 (Friday) 25N45 84E10 Asc:29Aq45 --Father expired on 17 Mar 1991 --Bsc on april 1998 --Msc on april 2000 --Bed on april 2002 --working as Teacher Government JOB --Father was too teacher in Government JOB. Can anybody solved this chart and find correct Date of marriage? Does marriage promise/not promiss? What was/will Date of marriage? P.S.Ascedence seems ok to me as that was seems correct matching more events. ------------ ------ Regards, Devisingh   The INTERNET now has a personality. YOURS! See your Homepage.   The INTERNET now has a personality. YOURS! See your Homepage.  The INTERNET now has a personality. YOURS! See your Homepage. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 29, 2010 Report Share Posted January 29, 2010 Respected Krushnajee and Cliff, I am relatively new, I have been following the post very carefully so that I learn the basics . I was not able to understand how the the significator values of the Planets were found. (su/12, Mo/27, Ma/29, Me/14, Ju/30,Ve/10, Sa/46). Please guide . Shashikant , Cliff Begg <cbegg wrote: > > Dear Krushna > > > I have not posted before but have have been impressed by the results > that many are getting with the system > > In Prahash's example I got the following significator values: > > Su Mo Ma Me Ju Ve Sa > 12 27 29 14 30 10 46 > > If these are correct Saturn would be the first significator but it > aspects B and isn't considered > Jupiter is next and is Lord of E but you mentioned that it malefically > aspects Venus the NK and FK so it is less likely? > Mars is next and seems OK > Moon is next and is Lord of D and in E so is eager to come forward > Is this the reasoning that leads to choosing Moon over Jupiter? > > Also could you give the reason for Moon being samdharmi to Saturn > > > Best wishes > > > Cliff > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 29, 2010 Report Share Posted January 29, 2010 Dear Shashikant ji, Kindly read the lessons which are available from Donna’s website at http://krushna.sageasita.com You can also download the KAS program as well. If you read the lessons, I think you will understand and grasp all this. Cheers !!! Ash -> http://www.ashtro.ca On Behalf Of shashi1902 Friday January 29, 2010 5:40 AM To: Subject: Re: Date of Marriage Respected Krushnajee and Cliff, I am relatively new, I have been following the post very carefully so that I learn the basics . I was not able to understand how the the significator values of the Planets were found. (su/12, Mo/27, Ma/29, Me/14, Ju/30,Ve/10, Sa/46). Please guide . Shashikant , Cliff Begg <cbegg wrote: > > Dear Krushna > > > I have not posted before but have have been impressed by the results > that many are getting with the system > > In Prahash's example I got the following significator values: > > Su Mo Ma Me Ju Ve Sa > 12 27 29 14 30 10 46 > > If these are correct Saturn would be the first significator but it > aspects B and isn't considered > Jupiter is next and is Lord of E but you mentioned that it malefically > aspects Venus the NK and FK so it is less likely? > Mars is next and seems OK > Moon is next and is Lord of D and in E so is eager to come forward > Is this the reasoning that leads to choosing Moon over Jupiter? > > Also could you give the reason for Moon being samdharmi to Saturn > > > Best wishes > > > Cliff > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 29, 2010 Report Share Posted January 29, 2010 Dear Shashikant ji, Can you please give the message number so that I can look up the chart that was given by Cliff. Cheers !!! Ash -> http://www.ashtro.ca On Behalf Of shashi1902 Friday January 29, 2010 5:40 AM Subject: Re: Date of Marriage Respected Krushnajee and Cliff, I am relatively new, I have been following the post very carefully so that I learn the basics . I was not able to understand how the the significator values of the Planets were found. (su/12, Mo/27, Ma/29, Me/14, Ju/30,Ve/10, Sa/46). Please guide . Shashikant , Cliff Begg <cbegg wrote: > > Dear Krushna > > > I have not posted before but have have been impressed by the results > that many are getting with the system > > In Prahash's example I got the following significator values: > > Su Mo Ma Me Ju Ve Sa > 12 27 29 14 30 10 46 > > If these are correct Saturn would be the first significator but it > aspects B and isn't considered > Jupiter is next and is Lord of E but you mentioned that it malefically > aspects Venus the NK and FK so it is less likely? > Mars is next and seems OK > Moon is next and is Lord of D and in E so is eager to come forward > Is this the reasoning that leads to choosing Moon over Jupiter? > > Also could you give the reason for Moon being samdharmi to Saturn > > > Best wishes > > > Cliff > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 29, 2010 Report Share Posted January 29, 2010 Dear Ashjee, Sorry for the confusion , the message no is 2039 of 22July 2039 by Cliff Begg. Unfortunately, I followed the thread of the messages and this msg was the first one and down the line , the 5th msg was 21713 of Dec 30, 2009 . I took the birth details from this msg and tried to apply it to the logic given in the msg 2039. So this analysis, based on incorrect data, was bound to fail. I already have the lessons and downloaded the program. So if I have the birth details for msg 2039 then probably I will understand how the the significator values the Planets were calculated . Sorry once again for the confusion. Actually for a long time I have been trying to put together analysis as per KAS and try out the various practice charts put forward. But when I see a galaxy of learned participants putting forward their assesment , I find I am far short of the minimum level, so I prefer to put the analysis at my own end and then try and tally it with the others. Only when I am sure that I can be at least over the minimum level, then I can start posting my analysis for corrections . In this process , I sometimes get stuck and hence the questions I have raised now and earlier. Hope with your blessings and support , I hope to be able to reach this level soon. Rgds Shashikant , " Ash's Corner " <kas wrote: > > Dear Shashikant ji, > > Can you please give the message number so that I can look up the chart that > was given by Cliff. > > Cheers !!! > Ash -> <http://www.ashtro.ca/> http://www.ashtro.ca > > > On Behalf Of shashi1902 > Friday January 29, 2010 5:40 AM > > Re: Date of Marriage > > > > > Respected Krushnajee and Cliff, > > I am relatively new, I have been following the post very carefully so that I > learn the basics . I was not able to understand how the the significator > values of the Planets were found. > (su/12, Mo/27, Ma/29, Me/14, Ju/30,Ve/10, Sa/46). Please guide . > > Shashikant > > > <%40> , Cliff Begg <cbegg@> > wrote: > > > > Dear Krushna > > > > > > I have not posted before but have have been impressed by the results > > that many are getting with the system > > > > In Prahash's example I got the following significator values: > > > > Su Mo Ma Me Ju Ve Sa > > 12 27 29 14 30 10 46 > > > > If these are correct Saturn would be the first significator but it > > aspects B and isn't considered > > Jupiter is next and is Lord of E but you mentioned that it malefically > > aspects Venus the NK and FK so it is less likely? > > Mars is next and seems OK > > Moon is next and is Lord of D and in E so is eager to come forward > > Is this the reasoning that leads to choosing Moon over Jupiter? > > > > Also could you give the reason for Moon being samdharmi to Saturn > > > > > > Best wishes > > > > > > Cliff > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 29, 2010 Report Share Posted January 29, 2010 Dear Shashikantji The data of the native is: DOB: 4th Jan 1979; TOB: 1-40 pm; POB: Jamshedpur ( India) Yes, there is a difference in calculation of the values of Ma. In the old post, Mo in 4th position has given points to Ma though Mo is with 3 points and Ma is with 2 points. A planet in the 4th position with more than 4 points can ONLY give points to a planet having less than 4 points in 10th position from it. So this point has been included in the new worksheet/software. This means the additional 16 basic points of Mo are not getting added to Ma. Hope this clarifies your doubt. Thanks Prabha , " shashi1902 " <m9892005644 wrote: > > > > Respected Krushnajee and Cliff, > > I am relatively new, I have been following the post very carefully so that I learn the basics . I was not able to understand how the the significator values of the Planets were found. > (su/12, Mo/27, Ma/29, Me/14, Ju/30,Ve/10, Sa/46). Please guide . > > Shashikant > > , Cliff Begg <cbegg@> wrote: > > > > Dear Krushna > > > > > > I have not posted before but have have been impressed by the results > > that many are getting with the system > > > > In Prahash's example I got the following significator values: > > > > Su Mo Ma Me Ju Ve Sa > > 12 27 29 14 30 10 46 > > > > If these are correct Saturn would be the first significator but it > > aspects B and isn't considered > > Jupiter is next and is Lord of E but you mentioned that it malefically > > aspects Venus the NK and FK so it is less likely? > > Mars is next and seems OK > > Moon is next and is Lord of D and in E so is eager to come forward > > Is this the reasoning that leads to choosing Moon over Jupiter? > > > > Also could you give the reason for Moon being samdharmi to Saturn > > > > > > Best wishes > > > > > > Cliff > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 29, 2010 Report Share Posted January 29, 2010 Dear Shashikant ji, Please do not apologies. It is me who should apologies for assuming that you did not read the lessons or the program. You question is valid and Prabha ji has give you the reason for the difference in the power of Mars. Actually, here there is a 4:10 but the power of planet in 4th place is 3 bindus so it CANNOT be take to judge good result or happy result. So it should not be considered. We have added that in the KAS program. For a proper and good 4:10 the planet in 10th must have less than 3 bindus and the planet in 4th from it must have more than 4 bindus. Also, please do not compare yourself with other members. Some of us had the good fortune of coming across Guru ji earlier and his teachings early in life and have valued the same and have enjoyed it since. On the contrary, please feel free to post each and every attempt of yours on the list. That way, if you are going away from the right track, every senior member here will help guide you. So please use this list to advance your learning and feel free to ask your questions if you get stuck on any laws of KAS. Please accept my apologies for assuming that you did not read the lessons or the program. I am very happy that u are reading the archives, it is a wealth of information. Thanks, sir, Cheers !!! Ash -> http://www.ashtro.ca On Behalf Of shashi1902 Friday January 29, 2010 12:13 PM To: Subject: Re: Date of Marriage Dear Ashjee, Sorry for the confusion , the message no is 2039 of 22July 2039 by Cliff Begg. Unfortunately, I followed the thread of the messages and this msg was the first one and down the line , the 5th msg was 21713 of Dec 30, 2009 . I took the birth details from this msg and tried to apply it to the logic given in the msg 2039. So this analysis, based on incorrect data, was bound to fail. I already have the lessons and downloaded the program. So if I have the birth details for msg 2039 then probably I will understand how the the significator values the Planets were calculated . Sorry once again for the confusion. Actually for a long time I have been trying to put together analysis as per KAS and try out the various practice charts put forward. But when I see a galaxy of learned participants putting forward their assesment , I find I am far short of the minimum level, so I prefer to put the analysis at my own end and then try and tally it with the others. Only when I am sure that I can be at least over the minimum level, then I can start posting my analysis for corrections . In this process , I sometimes get stuck and hence the questions I have raised now and earlier. Hope with your blessings and support , I hope to be able to reach this level soon. Rgds Shashikant , " Ash's Corner " <kas wrote: > > Dear Shashikant ji, > > Can you please give the message number so that I can look up the chart that > was given by Cliff. > > Cheers !!! > Ash -> <http://www.ashtro.ca/> http://www.ashtro.ca > > > On Behalf Of shashi1902 > Friday January 29, 2010 5:40 AM > > Re: Date of Marriage > > > > > Respected Krushnajee and Cliff, > > I am relatively new, I have been following the post very carefully so that I > learn the basics . I was not able to understand how the the significator > values of the Planets were found. > (su/12, Mo/27, Ma/29, Me/14, Ju/30,Ve/10, Sa/46). Please guide . > > Shashikant > > > <%40> , Cliff Begg <cbegg@> > wrote: > > > > Dear Krushna > > > > > > I have not posted before but have have been impressed by the results > > that many are getting with the system > > > > In Prahash's example I got the following significator values: > > > > Su Mo Ma Me Ju Ve Sa > > 12 27 29 14 30 10 46 > > > > If these are correct Saturn would be the first significator but it > > aspects B and isn't considered > > Jupiter is next and is Lord of E but you mentioned that it malefically > > aspects Venus the NK and FK so it is less likely? > > Mars is next and seems OK > > Moon is next and is Lord of D and in E so is eager to come forward > > Is this the reasoning that leads to choosing Moon over Jupiter? > > > > Also could you give the reason for Moon being samdharmi to Saturn > > > > > > Best wishes > > > > > > Cliff > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 29, 2010 Report Share Posted January 29, 2010 Dear Shashikant ji, You can check the Worksheet H7 in the KAS program. Read that along with the Lesson on how to compute the points. You will understand how the planets are getting the combined power. 1 Su Mo Ma Me Ju Ve Sa 2 A 2 5 5 5 5 3 6 4 2.2 B 7 4 5 4 4 6 5 5 2.3 C 11 3 6 4 5 3 6 2 3 Basic Strength 12 16 13 14 12 17 11 4 Planets in 4th Sign 12 3 12 12 7 11 8 4.1 Su 9 5.1 12 4.2 Mo 12 Mo Mo Mo 5.2 16 0 0 0 4.3 Ma 9 5.3 13 4.4 Me 9 5.4 14 4.5 Ju 4 5.5 12 4.6 Ve 8 Ve 5.6 17 17 4.7 Sa 5 5.7 11 5 Subtotal 0 0 0 0 0 0 17 6 Total of Rows 3 and 5 12 16 13 14 12 17 28 7 D/E Lords: Mo Ju Mo Ju 8.1 5 5 7.2 D occupies sign 4 Ju 8.2 7 7.3 E occupies sign 12 Mo 8.3 0 8 Subtotal 0 5 0 0 12 0 0 9 Total of Rows 6 and 8 12 21 13 14 24 17 28 10 aspecting A 2 Ve Sa 11.1 7 2 12.1 -7 6 10.2 aspecting B 7 Sa 11.2 2 12.2 6 10.3 aspecting C 11 Sa 11.3 2 12.3 6 12 Subtotal 0 0 0 0 0 -7 18 13 Total of Rows 9 and 12 12 21 13 14 24 10 46 14 asp. P1 P2 Su 9 15.1 16.1 4 0 14.2 Mo 12 15.2 16.2 3 5 14.3 Ma 9 Ma Ma 15.3 16.3 2 6 6 6 14.4 Me 9 15.4 16.4 5 -5 14.5 Ju 4 Ju Ju 15.5 16.5 7 -7 0 0 14.6 Ve 8 15.6 16.6 7 -7 14.7 Sa 5 15.7 16.7 2 6 16 House 7 Subtotal 0 6 0 0 6 0 0 17 FINAL POINT STRENGTH 12 27 13 14 30 10 46 18 RANK 6 3 5 4 2 7 1 Points 12 27 13 14 30 10 46 Planets Su Mo Ma Me Ju Ve Sa HOUSE MEANING 7 Marriage, relationships with opposite sex, business partner Strengths Planet Points Rank Strongest Sa 46 1 12 points or Ju 30 2 over Mo 27 3 Me 14 4 Under Ma 13 5 12 points Su 12 6 Weakest Ve 10 7 Cheers !!! Ash -> http://www.ashtro.ca On Behalf Of shashi1902 Friday January 29, 2010 12:13 PM To: Subject: Re: Date of Marriage Dear Ashjee, Sorry for the confusion , the message no is 2039 of 22July 2039 by Cliff Begg. Unfortunately, I followed the thread of the messages and this msg was the first one and down the line , the 5th msg was 21713 of Dec 30, 2009 . I took the birth details from this msg and tried to apply it to the logic given in the msg 2039. So this analysis, based on incorrect data, was bound to fail. I already have the lessons and downloaded the program. So if I have the birth details for msg 2039 then probably I will understand how the the significator values the Planets were calculated . Sorry once again for the confusion. Actually for a long time I have been trying to put together analysis as per KAS and try out the various practice charts put forward. But when I see a galaxy of learned participants putting forward their assesment , I find I am far short of the minimum level, so I prefer to put the analysis at my own end and then try and tally it with the others. Only when I am sure that I can be at least over the minimum level, then I can start posting my analysis for corrections . In this process , I sometimes get stuck and hence the questions I have raised now and earlier. Hope with your blessings and support , I hope to be able to reach this level soon. Rgds Shashikant , " Ash's Corner " <kas wrote: > > Dear Shashikant ji, > > Can you please give the message number so that I can look up the chart that > was given by Cliff. > > Cheers !!! > Ash -> <http://www.ashtro.ca/> http://www.ashtro.ca > > > On Behalf Of shashi1902 > Friday January 29, 2010 5:40 AM > > Re: Date of Marriage > > > > > Respected Krushnajee and Cliff, > > I am relatively new, I have been following the post very carefully so that I > learn the basics . I was not able to understand how the the significator > values of the Planets were found. > (su/12, Mo/27, Ma/29, Me/14, Ju/30,Ve/10, Sa/46). Please guide . > > Shashikant > > > <%40> , Cliff Begg <cbegg@> > wrote: > > > > Dear Krushna > > > > > > I have not posted before but have have been impressed by the results > > that many are getting with the system > > > > In Prahash's example I got the following significator values: > > > > Su Mo Ma Me Ju Ve Sa > > 12 27 29 14 30 10 46 > > > > If these are correct Saturn would be the first significator but it > > aspects B and isn't considered > > Jupiter is next and is Lord of E but you mentioned that it malefically > > aspects Venus the NK and FK so it is less likely? > > Mars is next and seems OK > > Moon is next and is Lord of D and in E so is eager to come forward > > Is this the reasoning that leads to choosing Moon over Jupiter? > > > > Also could you give the reason for Moon being samdharmi to Saturn > > > > > > Best wishes > > > > > > Cliff > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 29, 2010 Report Share Posted January 29, 2010 Dear Prabhajee, Many thanks for the data of the native, now all the figures tally and the difference in Ma points is also cleared up. Thanks a lot for the guidance. Rgds Shashikant , " prabha " <prabha.acharya wrote: > > Dear Shashikantji > The data of the native is: > DOB: 4th Jan 1979; TOB: 1-40 pm; POB: Jamshedpur ( India) > Yes, there is a difference in calculation of the values of Ma. > In the old post, Mo in 4th position has given points to Ma though Mo is with 3 points and Ma is with 2 points. A planet in the 4th position with more than 4 points can ONLY give points to a planet having less than 4 points in 10th position from it. > So this point has been included in the new worksheet/software. This means the additional 16 basic points of Mo are not getting added to Ma. > Hope this clarifies your doubt. > Thanks > Prabha > , " shashi1902 " <m9892005644@> wrote: > > > > > > > > Respected Krushnajee and Cliff, > > > > I am relatively new, I have been following the post very carefully so that I learn the basics . I was not able to understand how the the significator values of the Planets were found. > > (su/12, Mo/27, Ma/29, Me/14, Ju/30,Ve/10, Sa/46). Please guide . > > > > Shashikant > > > > , Cliff Begg <cbegg@> wrote: > > > > > > Dear Krushna > > > > > > > > > I have not posted before but have have been impressed by the results > > > that many are getting with the system > > > > > > In Prahash's example I got the following significator values: > > > > > > Su Mo Ma Me Ju Ve Sa > > > 12 27 29 14 30 10 46 > > > > > > If these are correct Saturn would be the first significator but it > > > aspects B and isn't considered > > > Jupiter is next and is Lord of E but you mentioned that it malefically > > > aspects Venus the NK and FK so it is less likely? > > > Mars is next and seems OK > > > Moon is next and is Lord of D and in E so is eager to come forward > > > Is this the reasoning that leads to choosing Moon over Jupiter? > > > > > > Also could you give the reason for Moon being samdharmi to Saturn > > > > > > > > > Best wishes > > > > > > > > > Cliff > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 29, 2010 Report Share Posted January 29, 2010 Dear Ashjee, Please sir, do not apologise. I am too junior a person for that. I have learnt Vedantic Philosophy from an able Master Swami Chinmayananda who always said " if you want to learn , do not lose sight of the goal, all other things are not important,even if the Master finds fault with anything you do " For learning KAS system, you are my teacher and I shall not lose sight of my goal ,to learn and understand KAS " Also thanks fr encouraging to put my analysis. I shall try my level best to do so soon. Rgds Shashikant , " Ash's Corner " <kas wrote: > > Dear Shashikant ji, > > Please do not apologies. It is me who should apologies for assuming that > you did not read the lessons or the program. > > You question is valid and Prabha ji has give you the reason for the > difference in the power of Mars. Actually, here there is a 4:10 but the > power of planet in 4th place is 3 bindus so it CANNOT be take to judge good > result or happy result. So it should not be considered. We have added that > in the KAS program. > > For a proper and good 4:10 the planet in 10th must have less than 3 bindus > and the planet in 4th from it must have more than 4 bindus. > > Also, please do not compare yourself with other members. Some of us had the > good fortune of coming across Guru ji earlier and his teachings early in > life and have valued the same and have enjoyed it since. > > On the contrary, please feel free to post each and every attempt of yours on > the list. That way, if you are going away from the right track, every > senior member here will help guide you. So please use this list to advance > your learning and feel free to ask your questions if you get stuck on any > laws of KAS. > > Please accept my apologies for assuming that you did not read the lessons or > the program. I am very happy that u are reading the archives, it is a > wealth of information. > > Thanks, sir, > Cheers !!! > Ash -> <http://www.ashtro.ca/> http://www.ashtro.ca > > > On Behalf Of shashi1902 > Friday January 29, 2010 12:13 PM > > Re: Date of Marriage > > > > Dear Ashjee, > Sorry for the confusion , the message no is 2039 of 22July 2039 by Cliff > Begg. Unfortunately, I followed the thread of the messages and this msg was > the first one and down the line , the 5th msg was 21713 of Dec 30, 2009 . I > took the birth details from this msg and tried to apply it to the logic > given in the msg 2039. So this analysis, based on incorrect data, was bound > to fail. > > I already have the lessons and downloaded the program. So if I have the > birth details for msg 2039 then probably I will understand how the the > significator values the Planets were calculated . > > Sorry once again for the confusion. Actually for a long time I have been > trying to put together analysis as per KAS and try out the various practice > charts put forward. But when I see a galaxy of learned participants putting > forward their assesment , I find I am far short of the minimum level, so I > prefer to put the analysis at my own end and then try and tally it with the > others. Only when I am sure that I can be at least over the minimum level, > then I can start posting my analysis for corrections . In this process , I > sometimes get stuck and hence the questions I have raised now and earlier. > Hope with your blessings and support , I hope to be able to reach this level > soon. > > Rgds Shashikant > > > <%40> , " Ash's Corner@ " > <kas@> wrote: > > > > Dear Shashikant ji, > > > > Can you please give the message number so that I can look up the chart > that > > was given by Cliff. > > > > Cheers !!! > > Ash -> <http://www.ashtro.ca/> http://www.ashtro.ca > > > > > <%40> > > [ > <%40> ] On Behalf Of > shashi1902 > > Friday January 29, 2010 5:40 AM > > > <%40> > > Re: Date of Marriage > > > > > > > > > > Respected Krushnajee and Cliff, > > > > I am relatively new, I have been following the post very carefully so that > I > > learn the basics . I was not able to understand how the the significator > > values of the Planets were found. > > (su/12, Mo/27, Ma/29, Me/14, Ju/30,Ve/10, Sa/46). Please guide . > > > > Shashikant > > > > > <%40> > > <%40> , Cliff Begg <cbegg@> > > wrote: > > > > > > Dear Krushna > > > > > > > > > I have not posted before but have have been impressed by the results > > > that many are getting with the system > > > > > > In Prahash's example I got the following significator values: > > > > > > Su Mo Ma Me Ju Ve Sa > > > 12 27 29 14 30 10 46 > > > > > > If these are correct Saturn would be the first significator but it > > > aspects B and isn't considered > > > Jupiter is next and is Lord of E but you mentioned that it malefically > > > aspects Venus the NK and FK so it is less likely? > > > Mars is next and seems OK > > > Moon is next and is Lord of D and in E so is eager to come forward > > > Is this the reasoning that leads to choosing Moon over Jupiter? > > > > > > Also could you give the reason for Moon being samdharmi to Saturn > > > > > > > > > Best wishes > > > > > > > > > Cliff > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.