Guest guest Posted July 9, 2006 Report Share Posted July 9, 2006 Dear Chris and John, Thank you for your thoughts. Much appreciated. " So many want to be special at the expense of the teachings and of those who would follow. Competition blocks the progression. " Yep,I agree with this completely ) Namaste A. , chrism <> wrote: > > Hi John, Angel, > Yes there are sooo many channeling Djwal Khul now it seems a practice in futility to even try to decipher who is what and where and it just isnt of interest to me really. Although Angel, I did at one point look very carefully at the Baily work. Much of it was attractive but much also depended on a persons following the channelings in a way that kind of addicted them to that information. Even now on other groups there are folks doing the bidding of Djwal Khul blindly and obediantly. > > This does not feel appropriate for me. For others fine. I honor their choice but for me there is a chasm of guidance in her works as carried on by those who have continued the work. Where is Bailey why is it just DK? > > So many want to be special at the expense of the teachings and of those who would follow. Competition blocks the progression. Just my take and no offense to the people who enjoy the Bailey works. I concur with your opinion John M. - > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 9, 2006 Report Share Posted July 9, 2006 Hi , I have been following this discussion and have to say that I agree with you Chrism and John. I was once told by a friend (who meditated for hours daily) that it's against cosmic law for higher beings or angels to take over anothers conciousness or body and that they would never do this kind of thing. It makes sense to me as it is a distraction , an entertaining one, but a distraction none the less. It's far more empowering to develope your own informations and connections to the divine then to seek it through another. I do believe it to be possible to hear the words of the others through devoted meditation or prayer, but the need to stand on a stage telling everyone the answers to their questions would probably be more ego based and coming from other realms. Still, all is in perfection and all is god, so it must be there for a reason. my thoughts, with love Elektra x x x chrism <> wrote: Hi John, Angel, Yes there are sooo many channeling Djwal Khul now it seems a practice in futility to even try to decipher who is what and where and it just isnt of interest to me really. Although Angel, I did at one point look very carefully at the Baily work. Much of it was attractive but much also depended on a persons following the channelings in a way that kind of addicted them to that information. Even now on other groups there are folks doing the bidding of Djwal Khul blindly and obediantly. To help you stay safe and secure online, we've developed the all new Security Centre. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 9, 2006 Report Share Posted July 9, 2006 right on Elektra....I agree wholeheartedly with that ego based channelling thingey.....I could always smell something was wrong (there's that smell thingey again:) heheehehehe) with that and never wanted that to happen to me. I always said I stand next to Source and get my answers there not through someone who is wanting to sell me something. And now I have K to help me get my answers. Okay World Cup finals time. Love you all lots--Andrea con infinito amore - with endless love :x Andrea Elektra Fire <elektra.fire Sunday, July 9, 2006 1:13:31 PM RE: Re: Seven Rays, religious experience Hi , I have been following this discussion and have to say that I agree with you Chrism and John. I was once told by a friend (who meditated for hours daily) that it's against cosmic law for higher beings or angels to take over anothers conciousness or body and that they would never do this kind of thing. It makes sense to me as it is a distraction , an entertaining one, but a distraction none the less. It's far more empowering to develope your own informations and connections to the divine then to seek it through another. I do believe it to be possible to hear the words of the others through devoted meditation or prayer, but the need to stand on a stage telling everyone the answers to their questions would probably be more ego based and coming from other realms. Still, all is in perfection and all is god, so it must be there for a reason. my thoughts, with love Elektra x x x chrism <@ > wrote: Hi John, Angel, Yes there are sooo many channeling Djwal Khul now it seems a practice in futility to even try to decipher who is what and where and it just isnt of interest to me really. Although Angel, I did at one point look very carefully at the Baily work. Much of it was attractive but much also depended on a persons following the channelings in a way that kind of addicted them to that information. Even now on other groups there are folks doing the bidding of Djwal Khul blindly and obediantly. ------------ --------- --------- --- To help you stay safe and secure online, we've developed the all new Security Centre. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 9, 2006 Report Share Posted July 9, 2006 Dear Elektra, Interesting thoughts I agree in a way with you ...even thought AA Bailey never said who was her Teacher....a student of her gave this information, without her permission, later (as far as I know) ) Namaste A. , Elektra Fire <elektra.fire wrote: > > Hi , > I have been following this discussion and have to say that I agree with you and John. > I was once told by a friend (who meditated for hours daily) that it's against cosmic law for higher beings or angels to take over anothers conciousness or body and that they would never do this kind of thing. It makes sense to me as it is a distraction , an entertaining one, but a distraction none the less. It's far more empowering to develope your own informations and connections to the divine then to seek it through another. > I do believe it to be possible to hear the words of the others through devoted meditation or prayer, but the need to stand on a stage telling everyone the answers to their questions would probably be more ego based and coming from other realms. > > Still, all is in perfection and all is god, so it must be there for a reason. > > my thoughts, with love Elektra x x x > > chrism <> wrote: > Hi John, Angel, > Yes there are sooo many channeling Djwal Khul now it seems a practice in futility to even try to decipher who is what and where and it just isnt of interest to me really. Although Angel, I did at one point look very carefully at the Baily work. Much of it was attractive but much also depended on a persons following the channelings in a way that kind of addicted them to that information. Even now on other groups there are folks doing the bidding of Djwal Khul blindly and obediantly. > > > To help you stay safe and secure online, we've developed the all new Security Centre. > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.