DNA SEL Stephen

[Guest guest]

Hi Sel and Stephen,

I remember reading once that certain great beings (or

perhaps some more ordinary once also!!!) would

reincarnate into the same family line to access memory

hidden in DNA of their past life times and abilities

to aid in a hasty ascension. Jesus being one of those

it is claimed about.

I think the DNA can contain memories of abilities and

talents from other life times that can help us move

upwards, sideways, or whatever direction we like to go

in (round and round in circles even...hee hee).

 

Everything about us is spiritual or light at the end

of the day,

thats the way I see it, DNA , earwax, semen, eggs,

blood, etc.

 

Elektra x x x

 

--- Stephen <stephen_1952 wrote:

 

> Hello Sel

>

> What you say makes a lot of sence to me. What our

> DNA might be a map

> of what we are physicaly, but doesn't have alot to

> do with our spirit.

>

> In our next life we will have different DNA but our

> soul, or spirit

> will be the same.

>

> I don't think DNA has anything to do with spiritual

> gifts that we

> might be able to use.

>

> Stephen O.

>

> Ontario, Canada.

>

>

> --- In

> ,

> " selena230 "

> <selena230 wrote:

> >

> > We are operating on the basis of the assumption

> that all we are as

> > individuals is exclusively a product of our DNA.

> This belief is based

> > on a popular trend in US media culture that

> reduces complex human

> > behaviors and abilities to individual genes. The

> simplicity of this

> > assumption is certainly comforting--for example,

> it relieves

> > individuals of a lot of responsibilities ( " a gene

> made me do it " );

> > additionally, the popular belief that " our genes

> hold the key to our

> > true selves " fosters the hope that, deep down, we

> are so much more

> > special than we seem to be otherwise. Not to

> mention that, by reducing

> > " human nature " to a bunch of genes, the need to

> put in any serious

> > effort to understand the complex world we live in

> becomes absolutely

> > redundant--a lazy student's dream!

> >

> > Unfortunately, pace much popular journalism, this

> theory does not hold

> > water (and even most serious geneticists would

> shudder at the thought

> > of such a simplification). If human beings both as

> a species and as

> > individuals are exclusively the product of their

> genes, this does not

> > explain why we are so different from other

> primates--chimps, for

> > example, with whom we share 98% of our DNA.

> Conversely, if the key to

> > understanding the uniqueness of the human

> experience is not in our

> > genes, what's all the hype about " activating our

> DNA " ? The argument

> > that the key to the difference between humans and

> chimps is in our

> > dormant DNA does not work, either, since genes

> that are not activated

> > are just that: not activated, and hence do not

> account for any

> > intrinsic or extrinsic qualities.

> >

> > Sorry for the wordy message. This is a topic I

> often discuss with my

> > students, and have a hard time just keeping quiet.

> From now on I will

> > keep my mouth shut, though--I promise! :-)

> >

> > Sel

>