Guest guest Posted March 24, 2007 Report Share Posted March 24, 2007 Maybe I am not understanding this whole concept. How can it be a BAD thing to heal others? Isn't this part of doing service? Wouldn't it be an oxymoron to take on someone else's bad Karma by doing a good deed? I would also like to clarify the detachment issue. Does this mean that you begin to care less for your loved ones? That they mean less to you? Or that you worry less because you are more spiritually evolved? Sarita , " Paul F " <paulffff wrote: > > Thanks for the in-depth answer. Considering only this aspect, it sounds > like you are still creating karma, and thus will return to this world again, > something I guess is generally not desired if full enlightenment can be > obtained. From a strictly karmic standpoint, it seems that it would be > better to not heal others, and to maintain a feeling of non- attachment. But > of course, there are other aspects to spirituality than just karma, and I'm > sure that benefits of love dwarfs the repercussions. Still, to my limited > consiousness, it seems that it would be very tricky healing people in > hospitals and other places, without karma becoming an issue for you. I'm > sure all this will be clear for me in time. > > Thanks again chrism > Blessings to all... > Paul > > ....Golden Handcuffs are the guaranteed promise of another ride on the wheel > of incarnation by virtue of goodness. The other side of that would be the > badness that we do. > > ..... From a Kundalini standpoint this is where non-attachment can play a big > role. As you become unattached to the material aspects of earthly life you > begin to distance yourself from another excursion here in a new body. Some > few here are having the feelings of non attachment come to them and this is > good an natural. Part of the Kundalini process. > > _______________ > Get a FREE Web site, company branded e-mail and more from Microsoft Office > Live! http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/mcrssaub0050001411mrt/direct/01/ > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 24, 2007 Report Share Posted March 24, 2007 Pardon my inability at explanation. Let me add to the previous answer. Love is the great balancer. Selfless service meaning that which is not intended for recompense does not carry a dept, golden or otherwise. Charities are often used as a place for tax reduction and other issues of wealth and they are good devices but they are not unattached. Non attachment is a lesson directed to materialism,. body being beautiful or ego driven desires as in power or position. Personal aggrandizement, or material wealth. These are what can be seen as areas for non-attachment to be placed. Love is not that area. Love that is of a higher purpose. Certain qualities of love that are based in need are not what I mean. When I go into the hospitals they do not even know my name. I give, and allow them to receive what is appropriate for them. I do not wait and see about results. Helping someone cross the street. Helping someone over an illness, Helping a child find its parents, helping or providing a service behind the scenes without an " attaboy " ' or an " attagiirl. " Stopping at the scene of an accident and pulling someone out of a car or giving aid. These are not Golden unless you attach a quality of wanting to be noticed or desiring to be seen as the helper or the hero or heroine. These are fine and yes they are positive but they do incur a reverse karmic dept. In many cases. They become Golden. Not always as we are individuals. I am giving broad outlines here. So much is based in how the person views the actions being committed. And what if any expectations are being put in place. Your attitude counts. When you reach a point of allowing the goodness of service to be your guidance and eschew the notoriety of the good deed or helpful service,olr any though of " pay back " then you are erasing Karma. Or balancing it. This has been and is the understanding of it in this area that I have. - Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 24, 2007 Report Share Posted March 24, 2007 Sarita <sarita1969 wrote: Or that you worry less because you are more spiritually evolved? This is closer to the idea. You stay engaged with your loved ones but from a higer point of view and you are guided in this as well. - Recent Activity 7 New Members Visit Your Group 360° Get Started Your place online To share your life Y! GeoCities Be Vocal Publish your opi- nions with a blog. Need traffic? Drive customers With search ads on . Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 24, 2007 Report Share Posted March 24, 2007 It seems to me that those who get into healing or other " service " for the purpose of recognition, to show off or to lift themselves up are NOT doing self less acts. They are feeding their own needs and although they may be doing good, I would expect there to be Karmic consequences. I have come across people who help others to gratify themselves, in fact, it almost seems like an addiction to them. They frolick in the adulation, it makes them high. My mother often does things anonymously, not wanting the attention. If I am correct, that would fall under selfless acts that pay off Karmic debt. Sarita Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 25, 2007 Report Share Posted March 25, 2007 Okay - thank you once more chrism. I think that my primary problem at this point is that I don't know enough about the healing process. (Those of you well beyond my stage please pardon me.) To give you an example, my wife's mom has been recently discovered to have alzheimer's. My wife is in Brazil with her family for a few weeks, and they are having a rough time. She asked me for healing energy for her mom and energy for strength for her and all her family. At my stage, I only know to visualize energy from my heart flowing to her mom's apartment (and to other households that I've visited there), seeing them as peaceful, loving and happy. I can visualize her mom, I can visualize a blue or white wave of energy from " me " surrounding her making her calm and happy. Am I going too far with this? I know and love her mom - she is a very sweet person, but I want to understand where the line is that I should not cross. I don't think that the " selfless " part of this will be an issue - they are far away from me and could not know. By the way, since I'm on the subject, if it is proper, I guess I should make the same request of this group that my wife has made of me. Her family is very special. She is from a large family (my wife is the last of 15 kids). Since my wife's dad died in 1992, her mom has not wanted to sleep alone, so they have taken turns staying with her each and every night. They are all very close, and they are all suffering now. Any appropriate energy or healing would be much appreciated. Thank you chrism and the group.. Many blesssings Paul > <> > > >RE: Re: bodily weirdness! - Paul >-Karma >Sat, 24 Mar 2007 21:05:53 -0700 (PDT) > >Pardon my inability at explanation. Let me add to the previous answer. Love >is the great balancer. Selfless service meaning that which is not intended >for recompense does not carry a dept, golden or otherwise. Charities are >often used as a place for tax reduction and other issues of wealth and they >are good devices but they are not unattached. Non attachment is a lesson >directed to materialism,. body being beautiful or ego driven desires as in >power or position. Personal aggrandizement, or material wealth. These are >what can be seen as areas for non-attachment to be placed. Love is not that >area. Love that is of a higher purpose. Certain qualities of love that are >based in need are not what I mean. > > When I go into the hospitals they do not even know my name. I give, and >allow them to receive what is appropriate for them. I do not wait and see >about results. > > Helping someone cross the street. Helping someone over an illness, >Helping a child find its parents, helping or providing a service behind the >scenes without an " attaboy " ' or an " attagiirl. " Stopping at the scene of an >accident and pulling someone out of a car or giving aid. These are not >Golden unless you attach a quality of wanting to be noticed or desiring to >be seen as the helper or the hero or heroine. These are fine and yes they >are positive but they do incur a reverse karmic dept. In many cases. They >become Golden. Not always as we are individuals. I am giving broad outlines >here. > > So much is based in how the person views the actions being committed. >And what if any expectations are being put in place. Your attitude counts. > > When you reach a point of allowing the goodness of service to be your >guidance and eschew the notoriety of the good deed or helpful service,olr >any though of " pay back " then you are erasing Karma. Or balancing it. This >has been and is the understanding of it in this area that I have. - > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 25, 2007 Report Share Posted March 25, 2007 Paul if you would give us your mother-in-laws name I will send energy to her. May peace and love be with you! Love, Katherine Paul F <paulffff wrote: Okay - thank you once more chrism. I think that my primary problem at this point is that I don't know enough about the healing process. (Those of you well beyond my stage please pardon me.) To give you an example, my wife's mom has been recently discovered to have alzheimer's. My wife is in Brazil with her family for a few weeks, and they are having a rough time. She asked me for healing energy for her mom and energy for strength for her and all her family. At my stage, I only know to visualize energy from my heart flowing to her mom's apartment (and to other households that I've visited there), seeing them as peaceful, loving and happy. I can visualize her mom, I can visualize a blue or white wave of energy from " me " surrounding her making her calm and happy. Am I going too far with this? I know and love her mom - she is a very sweet person, but I want to understand where the line is that I should not cross. I don't think that the " selfless " part of this will be an issue - they are far away from me and could not know. By the way, since I'm on the subject, if it is proper, I guess I should make the same request of this group that my wife has made of me. Her family is very special. She is from a large family (my wife is the last of 15 kids). Since my wife's dad died in 1992, her mom has not wanted to sleep alone, so they have taken turns staying with her each and every night. They are all very close, and they are all suffering now. Any appropriate energy or healing would be much appreciated. Thank you chrism and the group.. Many blesssings Paul > > > >RE: Re: bodily weirdness! - Paul >-Karma >Sat, 24 Mar 2007 21:05:53 -0700 (PDT) > >Pardon my inability at explanation. Let me add to the previous answer. Love >is the great balancer. Selfless service meaning that which is not intended >for recompense does not carry a dept, golden or otherwise. Charities are >often used as a place for tax reduction and other issues of wealth and they >are good devices but they are not unattached. Non attachment is a lesson >directed to materialism,. body being beautiful or ego driven desires as in >power or position. Personal aggrandizement, or material wealth. These are >what can be seen as areas for non-attachment to be placed. Love is not that >area. Love that is of a higher purpose. Certain qualities of love that are >based in need are not what I mean. > > When I go into the hospitals they do not even know my name. I give, and >allow them to receive what is appropriate for them. I do not wait and see >about results. > > Helping someone cross the street. Helping someone over an illness, >Helping a child find its parents, helping or providing a service behind the >scenes without an " attaboy " ' or an " attagiirl. " Stopping at the scene of an >accident and pulling someone out of a car or giving aid. These are not >Golden unless you attach a quality of wanting to be noticed or desiring to >be seen as the helper or the hero or heroine. These are fine and yes they >are positive but they do incur a reverse karmic dept. In many cases. They >become Golden. Not always as we are individuals. I am giving broad outlines >here. > > So much is based in how the person views the actions being committed. >And what if any expectations are being put in place. Your attitude counts. > > When you reach a point of allowing the goodness of service to be your >guidance and eschew the notoriety of the good deed or helpful service,olr >any though of " pay back " then you are erasing Karma. Or balancing it. This >has been and is the understanding of it in this area that I have. - > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 25, 2007 Report Share Posted March 25, 2007 Okay, to keep chrism from having to make another long reply and repeat what he's already told me, I will try once more and stop. :-) I think I am over complicating things.... 'blame it on things that I read earlier in life about karma. So in general, if love or energy is selfless, then I should not have to worry about karmic repercussions - the karma of the other individual or that person's higher self would either use or ignore the energy? If this is true, then it's very simple, and I like simple. :-) Thanks Paul _______________ Watch free concerts with Pink, Rod Stewart, Oasis and more. Visit MSN Presents today. http://music.msn.com/presents?icid=ncmsnpresentstagline & ocid=T002MSN03A07001 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 25, 2007 Report Share Posted March 25, 2007 Thank you Katherine. I hope that peace and love is always with you too. Her name is Maria. Blessings ... Paul >Katherine Miller <katsam19 > > >RE: Re: bodily weirdness! - Paul >-Karma >Sun, 25 Mar 2007 06:33:58 -0700 (PDT) > >Paul if you would give us your mother-in-laws name I will send energy to >her. May peace and love be with you! > > Love, > Katherine > >Paul F <paulffff wrote: > Okay - thank you once more chrism. I think that my primary problem at >this >point is that I don't know enough about the healing process. (Those of you >well beyond my stage please pardon me.) To give you an example, my wife's >mom has been recently discovered to have alzheimer's. My wife is in Brazil >with her family for a few weeks, and they are having a rough time. She >asked me for healing energy for her mom and energy for strength for her and >all her family. At my stage, I only know to visualize energy from my heart >flowing to her mom's apartment (and to other households that I've visited >there), seeing them as peaceful, loving and happy. I can visualize her mom, >I can visualize a blue or white wave of energy from " me " surrounding her >making her calm and happy. Am I going too far with this? I know and love >her mom - she is a very sweet person, but I want to understand where the >line is that I should not cross. I don't think that the " selfless " part of >this will be an issue - they are far away from me and could not know. > >By the way, since I'm on the subject, if it is proper, I guess I should >make >the same request of this group that my wife has made of me. Her family is >very special. She is from a large family (my wife is the last of 15 kids). >Since my wife's dad died in 1992, her mom has not wanted to sleep alone, so >they have taken turns staying with her each and every night. They are all >very close, and they are all suffering now. Any appropriate energy or >healing would be much appreciated. > >Thank you chrism and the group.. > >Many blesssings >Paul > > > > > > > > > >RE: Re: bodily weirdness! - Paul > >-Karma > >Sat, 24 Mar 2007 21:05:53 -0700 (PDT) > > > >Pardon my inability at explanation. Let me add to the previous answer. >Love > >is the great balancer. Selfless service meaning that which is not >intended > >for recompense does not carry a dept, golden or otherwise. Charities are > >often used as a place for tax reduction and other issues of wealth and >they > >are good devices but they are not unattached. Non attachment is a lesson > >directed to materialism,. body being beautiful or ego driven desires as >in > >power or position. Personal aggrandizement, or material wealth. These are > >what can be seen as areas for non-attachment to be placed. Love is not >that > >area. Love that is of a higher purpose. Certain qualities of love that >are > >based in need are not what I mean. > > > > When I go into the hospitals they do not even know my name. I give, and > >allow them to receive what is appropriate for them. I do not wait and see > >about results. > > > > Helping someone cross the street. Helping someone over an illness, > >Helping a child find its parents, helping or providing a service behind >the > >scenes without an " attaboy " ' or an " attagiirl. " Stopping at the scene of >an > >accident and pulling someone out of a car or giving aid. These are not > >Golden unless you attach a quality of wanting to be noticed or desiring >to > >be seen as the helper or the hero or heroine. These are fine and yes they > >are positive but they do incur a reverse karmic dept. In many cases. They > >become Golden. Not always as we are individuals. I am giving broad >outlines > >here. > > > > So much is based in how the person views the actions being committed. > >And what if any expectations are being put in place. Your attitude >counts. > > > > When you reach a point of allowing the goodness of service to be your > >guidance and eschew the notoriety of the good deed or helpful service,olr > >any though of " pay back " then you are erasing Karma. Or balancing it. >This > >has been and is the understanding of it in this area that I have. - > > > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 25, 2007 Report Share Posted March 25, 2007 To write this in a form that is understandable, as long as the love or energy is selfless, then the use of the energy would either be used or not used in accordance with that person's higher self, and the dictates of karma.... > " Paul F " <paulffff > > >RE: Re: bodily weirdness! - Paul >-Karma >Sun, 25 Mar 2007 09:38:39 -0400 > >Okay, to keep chrism from having to make another long reply and repeat what >he's already told me, I will try once more and stop. :-) I think I am over >complicating things.... 'blame it on things that I read earlier in life >about karma. So in general, if love or energy is selfless, then I should >not have to worry about karmic repercussions - the karma of the other >individual or that person's higher self would either use or ignore the >energy? If this is true, then it's very simple, and I like simple. :-) > >Thanks >Paul > >_______________ >Watch free concerts with Pink, Rod Stewart, Oasis and more. Visit MSN >Presents today. >http://music.msn.com/presents?icid=ncmsnpresentstagline & ocid=T002MSN03A07001 > _______________ The average US Credit Score is 675. The cost to see yours: $0 by Experian. http://www.freecreditreport.com/pm/default.aspx?sc=660600 & bcd=EMAILFOOTERAVERAGE Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 25, 2007 Report Share Posted March 25, 2007 Hey Paul, I'm certainly no expert on healing and energy work. However I would just say that when you send the energy, visualize or pray- I think a simple addition of " For the highest good of all concerned " is all you need. Dis-ease is all serving some higher purspose. Who is to know what exact lesson each individual or group is going through? When someone's time has come? Perhaps the energy you send is not best used in actually 'healing the illness' but in helping the individual find the best possible way to learn whatever the lesson is as quickly and as efficiently as possible. For example, if a slow lingering death was agreed upon by an individual to help open another's heart, our overattachment to one outcome (healing the sick person) might not be helping. When we send it to the situation with the highest good of all concerned stipulated, our higher selves are more free to use the energy for the best outcome for everyone. So we send the energy thinking of the best possible outcome, even if we are not sure of that is... And we let it go. The universe/god is infinitely more wise than I! And yet we are part of it, and I am sure our positive intentions are indeed very welcome and encouraged. Send all the loving thoughts and energy you can manage, fear not! Cheers, Bradly PS: Any more experienced healers on the list please add or comment! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 25, 2007 Report Share Posted March 25, 2007 A very good way of putting it Bradly - curball2002 <curball2002 wrote: Hey Paul, I'm certainly no expert on healing and energy work. However I would just say that when you send the energy, visualize or pray- I think a simple addition of " For the highest good of all concerned " is all you need. Dis-ease is all serving some higher purspose. Who is to know what exact lesson each individual or group is going through? When someone's time has come? Perhaps the energy you send is not best used in actually 'healing the illness' but in helping the individual find the best possible way to learn whatever the lesson is as quickly and as efficiently as possible. For example, if a slow lingering death was agreed upon by an individual to help open another's heart, our overattachment to one outcome (healing the sick person) might not be helping. When we send it to the situation with the highest good of all concerned stipulated, our higher selves are more free to use the energy for the best outcome for everyone. So we send the energy thinking of the best possible outcome, even if we are not sure of that is... And we let it go. The universe/god is infinitely more wise than I! And yet we are part of it, and I am sure our positive intentions are indeed very welcome and encouraged. Send all the loving thoughts and energy you can manage, fear not! Cheers, Bradly PS: Any more experienced healers on the list please add or comment! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 25, 2007 Report Share Posted March 25, 2007 Thanks Bradly... It's amazing how the small points can bog you down. :-) And thanks for the patience of the group! Blessings Paul > " curball2002 " <curball2002 > > > Re: bodily weirdness! - Paul >-Karma >Sun, 25 Mar 2007 14:19:29 -0000 > >Hey Paul, > >I'm certainly no expert on healing and energy work. However I would >just say that when you send the energy, visualize or pray- I think a >simple addition of " For the highest good of all concerned " is all you >need. Dis-ease is all serving some higher purspose. Who is to know what >exact lesson each individual or group is going through? When someone's >time has come? Perhaps the energy you send is not best used in >actually 'healing the illness' but in helping the individual find the >best possible way to learn whatever the lesson is as quickly and as >efficiently as possible. For example, if a slow lingering death was >agreed upon by an individual to help open another's heart, our >overattachment to one outcome (healing the sick person) might not be >helping. When we send it to the situation with the highest good of all >concerned stipulated, our higher selves are more free to use the energy >for the best outcome for everyone. So we send the energy thinking of >the best possible outcome, even if we are not sure of that is... And we >let it go. The universe/god is infinitely more wise than I! And yet we >are part of it, and I am sure our positive intentions are indeed very >welcome and encouraged. Send all the loving thoughts and energy you can >manage, fear not! > >Cheers, > >Bradly > >PS: Any more experienced healers on the list please add or comment! > > _______________ Interest Rates near 39yr lows! $430,000 Mortgage for $1,399/mo - Calculate new payment http://www.lowermybills.com/lre/index.jsp?sourceid=lmb-9632-18466 & moid=7581 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 25, 2007 Report Share Posted March 25, 2007 Well, this answers a question I was going to ask! I work in an Oncology office and I was going to ask about sending healing energy to the cancer patients and what the ramifications are. But what you say makes perfect sense. Send the energy with the intent that whatever is for the higher good is done with it and there is no chance for complication. Sarita , " curball2002 " <curball2002 wrote: > > Hey Paul, > > I'm certainly no expert on healing and energy work. However I would > just say that when you send the energy, visualize or pray- I think a > simple addition of " For the highest good of all concerned " is all you > need. Dis-ease is all serving some higher purspose. Who is to know what > exact lesson each individual or group is going through? When someone's > time has come? Perhaps the energy you send is not best used in > actually 'healing the illness' but in helping the individual find the > best possible way to learn whatever the lesson is as quickly and as > efficiently as possible. For example, if a slow lingering death was > agreed upon by an individual to help open another's heart, our > overattachment to one outcome (healing the sick person) might not be > helping. When we send it to the situation with the highest good of all > concerned stipulated, our higher selves are more free to use the energy > for the best outcome for everyone. So we send the energy thinking of > the best possible outcome, even if we are not sure of that is... And we > let it go. The universe/god is infinitely more wise than I! And yet we > are part of it, and I am sure our positive intentions are indeed very > welcome and encouraged. Send all the loving thoughts and energy you can > manage, fear not! > > Cheers, > > Bradly > > PS: Any more experienced healers on the list please add or comment! > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 25, 2007 Report Share Posted March 25, 2007 Hi Bradley, Paul, What you describe is how I was shown to do healing by my guides. My description was 'unconditional love' which I understand has the same meaning as " self-less healing " . I step into a persons physcial space, or send astrally 'unconditional love' then step back or close off and disconnect. I don't start with the intent to heal any situation or person, I don't check afterwards to see what healing or outcome has occured. I totally disconnect and move onto something else. The original Polarity Therapy by Dr Randolf Stone was based on this concept and my guidence directed me to study it and practice it. Some people/situations are meant to be healed....some aren't healed because they have chosen to learn lessons or gain first hand experience in difficult situations - for their souls evolution and growth - this often cultivates compassion and empathy in a person as well. Namaste.. Amaargi , " curball2002 " <curball2002 wrote: > > Hey Paul, > > I'm certainly no expert on healing and energy work. However I would > just say that when you send the energy, visualize or pray- I think a > simple addition of " For the highest good of all concerned " is all you > need. Dis-ease is all serving some higher purspose. Who is to know what > exact lesson each individual or group is going through? When someone's > time has come? Perhaps the energy you send is not best used in > actually 'healing the illness' but in helping the individual find the > best possible way to learn whatever the lesson is as quickly and as > efficiently as possible. For example, if a slow lingering death was > agreed upon by an individual to help open another's heart, our > overattachment to one outcome (healing the sick person) might not be > helping. When we send it to the situation with the highest good of all > concerned stipulated, our higher selves are more free to use the energy > for the best outcome for everyone. So we send the energy thinking of > the best possible outcome, even if we are not sure of that is... And we > let it go. The universe/god is infinitely more wise than I! And yet we > are part of it, and I am sure our positive intentions are indeed very > welcome and encouraged. Send all the loving thoughts and energy you can > manage, fear not! > > Cheers, > > Bradly > > PS: Any more experienced healers on the list please add or comment! > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 25, 2007 Report Share Posted March 25, 2007 Thanks Amaargi - I find this very interesting. I looked at volume 1 of Polarity Therapy on Amazon and this is definitely a study in itself. Perhaps it is best for me to not mix it with the Kundalini for now, but I'll mark it on my list of things to eventually buy. Thank you very much. And chrism, I felt your pain in trying to explain this stuff to the newbie (myself). I almost turned into the classic example of a newbie.. one who asks too many questions and analyzes too much. But I appreciate your's and everyone else's input, and I do have a better understanding now. Blessings to all... Paul > " ama_ar_gi " <ama_ar_gi > > > Re: bodily weirdness! - Paul >-Karma >Mon, 26 Mar 2007 00:35:44 -0000 > >Hi Bradley, Paul, > >What you describe is how I was shown to do healing by my guides... _______________ Mortgage refinance is hot 1) Rates near 30-yr lows 2) Good credit get intro-rate 4.625%* https://www2.nextag.com/goto.jsp?product=100000035 & url=%2fst.jsp & tm=y & search=mor\ tgage_text_links_88_h2a5f & s=4056 & p=5117 & disc=y & vers=743 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 25, 2007 Report Share Posted March 25, 2007 Paul, you are far from alone in the Newbie-Boat! I'm right there with you, learning every day. This is a terrific place to do it too, non judgemental and patient. Sarita , " Paul F " <paulffff wrote: > And chrism, I felt your pain in trying to explain this stuff to the newbie > (myself). I almost turned into the classic example of a newbie.. one who > asks too many questions and analyzes too much. But I appreciate your's and > everyone else's input, and I do have a better understanding now. > > Blessings to all... > > Paul > > > " ama_ar_gi " <ama_ar_gi > > > > > > Re: bodily weirdness! - Paul > >-Karma > >Mon, 26 Mar 2007 00:35:44 -0000 > > > >Hi Bradley, Paul, > > > >What you describe is how I was shown to do healing by my guides... > > _______________ > Mortgage refinance is hot 1) Rates near 30-yr lows 2) Good credit get > intro-rate 4.625%* > https://www2.nextag.com/goto.jsp?product=100000035 & url=% 2fst.jsp & tm=y & search=mortgage_text_links_88_h2a5f & s=4056 & p=5117 & disc=y & vers=743 > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 25, 2007 Report Share Posted March 25, 2007 My lack of a coherent response isn't your fault. It is good and appropriate to be mindful of these issues. Please keep asking questions as they represent others who have the same questions = we all can learn. - blessings Paul - chrism Paul F <paulffff wrote: Thanks Amaargi - I find this very interesting. I looked at volume 1 of Polarity Therapy on Amazon and this is definitely a study in itself. Perhaps it is best for me to not mix it with the Kundalini for now, but I'll mark it on my list of things to eventually buy. Thank you very much. And chrism, I felt your pain in trying to explain this stuff to the newbie (myself). I almost turned into the classic example of a newbie.. one who asks too many questions and analyzes too much. But I appreciate your's and everyone else's input, and I do have a better understanding now. Blessings to all... Paul > " ama_ar_gi " <ama_ar_gi > > > Re: bodily weirdness! - Paul >-Karma >Mon, 26 Mar 2007 00:35:44 -0000 > >Hi Bradley, Paul, > >What you describe is how I was shown to do healing by my guides... ________ Mortgage refinance is hot 1) Rates near 30-yr lows 2) Good credit get intro-rate 4.625%* https://www2.nextag.com/goto.jsp?product=100000035 & url=%2fst.jsp & tm=y & search=mor\ tgage_text_links_88_h2a5f & s=4056 & p=5117 & disc=y & vers=743 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 26, 2007 Report Share Posted March 26, 2007 Hi Paul, I had an abridged description about Polarity Therapy that was included in a book on all types of spiritual healing, which explained briefly the basic concept of uncondional love and then detachment was the fundamental practise. I never studied any further than that and haven't done any of the hands on positions, hydro therapy, counselling etc that involves full Polarity Therapy. I send the energy of unconditional love out from within my heart/soul for distance healing or give a nice general massage while the person is in my aura physically. Something similar to a Shaktipat I suppose. I don't think much more is needed than that, but thats only my personal feeling and if anyone wants to go further and become a full Polarity Therapy practioner I'm sure the receiver of the healing will benefit greatly It's best not to mix it with kundalini if you are processing any of your own 'stuff'....you may get it all entangled and pass it along to the other person. It took me a long time to reach the complete 'unconditional' aspect of love - no strings nor attachments at all. It will depend on what we have to clear within first as to how long it will take to be able to do it correctly. Anyway, you'll know for yourself as you go along....Kundalini will show you the way.. Amaargi , " Paul F " <paulffff wrote: > > Thanks Amaargi - I find this very interesting. I looked at volume 1 of > Polarity Therapy on Amazon and this is definitely a study in itself. > Perhaps it is best for me to not mix it with the Kundalini for now, but I'll > mark it on my list of things to eventually buy. > Thank you very much. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 26, 2007 Report Share Posted March 26, 2007 Thanks Sarita. It's good to know that I'm not the only one. :-) Yes, there is a very nice group here, and we all ultimately share a common goal. I feel fortunate to have found this site. Thanks again for the kind words... Blessings to all... Paul > " Sarita " <sarita1969 > > > Re: bodily weirdness! - Paul >-Karma >Mon, 26 Mar 2007 03:12:48 -0000 > >Paul, you are far from alone in the Newbie-Boat! I'm right there >with you, learning every day. This is a terrific place to do it too, >non judgemental and patient. > >Sarita > > , " Paul F " ><paulffff wrote: > > > And chrism, I felt your pain in trying to explain this stuff to the >newbie > > (myself). I almost turned into the classic example of a newbie.. >one who > > asks too many questions and analyzes too much. But I appreciate >your's and > > everyone else's input, and I do have a better understanding now. > > > > Blessings to all... > > > > Paul > > > > > " ama_ar_gi " <ama_ar_gi > > > > > > > > > Re: bodily weirdness! - >Paul > > >-Karma > > >Mon, 26 Mar 2007 00:35:44 -0000 > > > > > >Hi Bradley, Paul, > > > > > >What you describe is how I was shown to do healing by my guides... > > > > _______________ > > Mortgage refinance is hot 1) Rates near 30-yr lows 2) Good credit >get > > intro-rate 4.625%* > > https://www2.nextag.com/goto.jsp?product=100000035 & url=% >2fst.jsp & tm=y & search=mortgage_text_links_88_h2a5f & s=4056 & p=5117 & disc=y > & vers=743 > > > > _______________ Watch free concerts with Pink, Rod Stewart, Oasis and more. Visit MSN Presents today. http://music.msn.com/presents?icid=ncmsnpresentstagline & ocid=T002MSN03A07001 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 26, 2007 Report Share Posted March 26, 2007 Thanks Amaargi... I believe what you describe is all that I'll need for now. And you're right, I don't want to confuse things further... one thing at a time. :-) Blessings.. Paul > " ama_ar_gi " <ama_ar_gi > > > Re: bodily weirdness! - Paul >-Karma >Mon, 26 Mar 2007 10:25:09 -0000 > >Hi Paul, > >I had an abridged description about Polarity Therapy that was >included in a book on all types of spiritual healing, which explained >briefly the basic concept of uncondional love and then detachment was >the fundamental practise. > >I never studied any further than that and haven't done any of the >hands on positions, hydro therapy, counselling etc that involves full >Polarity Therapy. > >I send the energy of unconditional love out from within my heart/soul >for distance healing or give a nice general massage while the person >is in my aura physically. Something similar to a Shaktipat I suppose. > >I don't think much more is needed than that, but thats only my >personal feeling and if anyone wants to go further and become a full >Polarity Therapy practioner I'm sure the receiver of the healing will >benefit greatly > >It's best not to mix it with kundalini if you are processing any of >your own 'stuff'....you may get it all entangled and pass it along to >the other person. > >It took me a long time to reach the complete 'unconditional' aspect >of love - no strings nor attachments at all. It will depend on what >we have to clear within first as to how long it will take to be able >to do it correctly. > >Anyway, you'll know for yourself as you go along....Kundalini will >show you the way.. > >Amaargi > > , " Paul F " ><paulffff wrote: > > > > Thanks Amaargi - I find this very interesting. I looked at volume >1 of > > Polarity Therapy on Amazon and this is definitely a study in >itself. > > Perhaps it is best for me to not mix it with the Kundalini for now, >but I'll > > mark it on my list of things to eventually buy. > > Thank you very much. > > _______________ It’s tax season, make sure to follow these few simple tips http://articles.moneycentral.msn.com/Taxes/PreparationTips/PreparationTips.aspx?\ icid=HMMartagline Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.