Intro & BWGen

[Guest guest]

Hi Brian,

> The propensity for seizure

> might not be a good thing to combine with these technologies in the

> future, though it's a very " grey area " there may be real and currently

> unknown dangers, but I'm no neuroscientist so take my opinion as such.

Yes, I agree, in hindsight. It is interesting to note that Western

Medical Science brands Epilepsy as a bad thing, i.e. brainwave activity

out of control, etc., whereas indiginous cultures elevate such people to

that of shamans and witch doctors. It has been shown that Temporal lobe

activity (responsible for most seizures) is or can be the trigger for

OBEs, astral travel, Shamanic journeys and many other what I would

regard as 'higher brain' activities. The medication I was being given

merely suppressed my brain's abilities to do this.

 

 

> my interpretation is that the 'shocks and jolts' are predecessors of

> seperation of awareness of the " energy body " from that of the physical

> body not unlike the experience of OOBE travellers.

 

Yes, I would agree somewhat. Although they may be a precursor to

seperation, I think you can have these sensations without the subsequent

seperation and that it is simply a speeding up of the vibrations of the

nervous system, which can culminate in OBEs and the like.

 

 

 

I think your analogy about the nervous system is dead-on (sorry for the

pun). that

> said, I think it's incorrect to consider it the " soul " , I think of it

> more as the interfacing mechanism between physical and nonphysical.

> which means (by my interpretation) it's quite possible to seriously

> affect or damage the connection by physical actions and/or devices.

> and I stand firm in my intuition that there are fields and forces our

> technologies are playing with which can have just such effects,

> despite their ubiquity and seeming beneficence.

 

I wholeheartedly agree with all of the above. In the case of devices, I

could not be near an electronic device - computer, mobile phone,

television - for months afterwards without being set off.

>

> as far as the 'evolutionary' side goes, several years back I would

> have totally agreed with you but nowadays anything that reads elitist

> fails the smell test with me. if anything, I believe that 'evolution'

> is trying to evolve past itself, hence past the necessity of the cycle

> of birth and death, at least this is from my own perspective and

> understanding. this will be the choice of the individual, and there

> will be no collective awakening, just a return to an earlier state of

> consciousness, while the invisible hierarchies incarnate in place of

> the spiritual egos, allowing evolution to try again and again.

 

I will have to think about this one!

 

 

 

Cheers, Tom...

[Guest guest]

> The medication I was being given

> merely suppressed my brain's abilities to do this.

right; present consensus reality couldn't exist without these

supressions, either 'natural' (i.e. unconscious and largely

involuntary) or artificially-induced and amounting to crippling of

higher cognitive functioning.

 

> Yes, I would agree somewhat. Although they may be a precursor to

> seperation, I think you can have these sensations without the

> subsequent seperation

yes

 

> I wholeheartedly agree with all of the above. In the case of

> devices, I could not be near an electronic device

issues of electronic interference seem to be a common theme described

by many here. I used to get sudden lockups of computers that no one

else would have a problem with. Among other phenomena, but there are

bigger effects others have mentioned in their experiences.

 

> I will have to think about this one!

it's sort of an opposing viewpoint from the usual party line, I

understand that - it's a different interpretation of the same

premises, an alternate scenario if you will. disagreement is welcomed.

 

-brian