Guest guest Posted May 28, 2007 Report Share Posted May 28, 2007 Hi Chrism, I thank you for your take on his article. As a newcomer to in depth views on K energy I am reading everything I can on this group and find it all fascinating and extremly helpful,very grateful such a group exists.Anyway, after reading the article i was quite frightened,I envisioned me, a big snake shooting up through my body,tearing me apart,sending lungs,liver,heart all flying around the room and if I didnt die of shock in the process i was likely to feel like someone had injected my spine with poison and be twisted in pain,lol........it made me want to back off the whole thing and I dont like OBEs, they happen me a lot and frighten me as i dont know where im heading,dont like seeing myself laying in bed while i float off elsewhere......so i thought,hey,forget this,but thank you again for your views. Karen , " chrism " <> wrote: > > I have been avoiding this as my intuitive natures have indicated how > far off the mark this person is with regards to the Kundalini. I do > not mean to burst any bubbles or to discredit him as he is held by > many to have great knowledge and experience with the subject. > > Suffice to say I have not found that to be the case. He is probably a > very nice person though I do not, in any way, intend to impugn his > personality. > > So I forced myself just now to read the " article " that zappy so > kindly provided. I must say that there is so much mis-information and > projection that I have over a page and then some of notes and I only > made it through half the article. I will stop. > > Rather than offer critiques about his " version " of the Kundalini and > its effects and ramifications upon the body and soul. I will simply > state that this is not what is offered here. Here are some of the > areas of what I refer to: > > No magic words or > Physically immortal masters is not the goal > Emperical processes are not required > Instant creation isnt automatically gifted > Instant control over the environment is not given > OBEs are not needed > 30 years of age is not required > No one " main " event being what he calls the snake > > No guessing about reasonable expectations after admitting you havent > experienced a type of phenomena > > Yes for crown openings but with out the loss of energy out the top of > the head and the other " issues " mentioned > > I find his whole way of approach to be one of domination over the > environment and " use " Of the Kundalini for want of gain and that of > the control of physical processes specifically of aging. This > indicates some level of fear with that process. And is also a catch > phrase for those who also wish this and in some way it is a con on > people who are chasing the fountain of youth thru Kundalini. Fear of > loss and want of gain is a constant attribute of this article. So I > will leave it at that and go my way. > > If I am asked again about the Robert Bruce material I will say " no " > one does not " need " to follow those descriptions or rules and or > limitations to activate and flow with the Kundalini. Not saying there > are no protocols for this purpose but they are not in that particular > article. And I do not wish to debate the rightness or the wrongness > of this here. > > If his information attracts you then go for it! But please do not > bring it back here unless you " must " for some reason or another. If > it is to defend his viewpoint then please do it with him and his > followers it will be more appreciated there. - > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.