Guest guest Posted August 4, 2007 Report Share Posted August 4, 2007 Sorry Bradly for the late response. No there is no danger of an unwanted or accidental Shaktipat when you are doing a healing by the application and intention of praying for another. As your activation moves into an awakening there can be some degree of transfer though by that time you will have a much better understanding of what is going on and the difference between the worlds of single aspect and multiple aspects. Your Siddhic nature and your Higher Self combined with your surrender to these and other " aspects " will allow you to understand what is and is not appropriate. Permission from an individual is very important as lives can be altered. Not just of the individual but of those close to them. As far as sending to the person who stole your property. If it is coming from a level of forgiveness and not from an expression of anger or revenge or another emotion similarly aspected then yes this is fine. Better to allow them their own balances imho. But this is your choice. No harm as far as a Shaktipat though. Sometimes with those who are very close to us activation can occur by proximity. A Proxipat is what I call it. Married partners can sometimes have this occur. If one is strongly awakening and the partner who is sharing the bed, the house, the life, the food, the body, with that awakening person, then yes transference can take place and this is often a blessing, and just as often a destruction of the relationship. It is important to take this out of the perspective of cause and effect. A Proxipat isn't just activation by proximity. It is one where all the decisions and movements the two have made that brought them together in the first place have all led up to this point in time. Karmic and other historical factors will apply. The degree of depth and understanding inside the relationship will apply. The personal proclivities of each person will apply. One needs to be there for what ever reason for this to occur. Those events that bring them together are not typically accidental. Ben made an allusion to activating others through experimentation as a younger person. Even so the parties involved had to be present and in the company of each other and inside the experience of the experimentation. I wouldn't see this as an accident. There was a complicity involved and a form of permission was granted. Shaktipat as I give here is not the same. I have experienced people blowing up inside their body and (i) will not allow this. (I) has made it safely available not the (i); this is what I mean by multi aspected interests. As I am made responsible by the gift so is the up line from myself made responsible and the next up line and so forth. Not saying that the events here are sooo important but just that they are recognized events. Judgments and decisions are being made based upon these actions. Karma is being made. As far as family members go it will depend upon the quality of contact and the receptivity to that contact. - hope this helps a little. - Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 4, 2007 Report Share Posted August 4, 2007 Just a note to say what people have reported to me is that when they come into my house it feels very " zen " . I used to amp up my homes too much I think and people became a bit disoriented, then had the energy stronger as one went through the house towards my bedroom threw which you had to pass to get to the hot tub (figured anyone who got that far in the house was a friend and it was OK) and now have it adjusted (like the heat or cooling system, lol) to a pretty high frequency so those who are able to feel that feel more but it does not disorient them and those who cannot feel that high a frequency feel whatever they can. I have been told by people to me, especially lovers, that they feel high or drunk when around me. I think that is cool. Foster kids come in with may issues and the frequency in the house will steady them where they are healthy and gently work on the places they are not. I have asked for guides and others interested in helping children to help. And still do hands on healing but with the intention to work only on whatever the person asks for and never to bump them to another level. And ask for boundries from guides, etc. so I do not accidentally hit something that will zoom people out to where they (and I) do not know how to function. It happened to me once. In gratefulness, Sherri -- The high destiny of the individual is to serve rather than rule-Albert Einstein -------------- Original message -------------- " chrism " <> Sorry Bradly for the late response. No there is no danger of an unwanted or accidental Shaktipat when you are doing a healing by the application and intention of praying for another. As your activation moves into an awakening there can be some degree of transfer though by that time you will have a much better understanding of what is going on and the difference between the worlds of single aspect and multiple aspects. Your Siddhic nature and your Higher Self combined with your surrender to these and other " aspects " will allow you to understand what is and is not appropriate. Permission from an individual is very important as lives can be altered. Not just of the individual but of those close to them. As far as sending to the person who stole your property. If it is coming from a level of forgiveness and not from an expression of anger or revenge or another emotion similarly aspected then yes this is fine. Better to allow them their own balances imho. But this is your choice. No harm as far as a Shaktipat though. Sometimes with those who are very close to us activation can occur by proximity. A Proxipat is what I call it. Married partners can sometimes have this occur. If one is strongly awakening and the partner who is sharing the bed, the house, the life, the food, the body, with that awakening person, then yes transference can take place and this is often a blessing, and just as often a destruction of the relationship. It is important to take this out of the perspective of cause and effect. A Proxipat isn't just activation by proximity. It is one where all the decisions and movements the two have made that brought them together in the first place have all led up to this point in time. Karmic and other historical factors will apply. The degree of depth and understanding inside the relationship will apply. The personal proclivities of each person will apply. One needs to be there for what ever reason for this to occur. Those events that bring them together are not typically accidental. Ben made an allusion to activating others through experimentation as a younger person. Even so the parties involved had to be present and in the company of each other and inside the experience of the experimentation. I wouldn't see this as an accident. There was a complicity involved and a form of permission was granted. Shaktipat as I give here is not the same. I have experienced people blowing up inside their body and (i) will not allow this. (I) has made it safely available not the (i); this is what I mean by multi aspected interests. As I am made responsible by the gift so is the up line from myself made responsible and the next up line and so forth. Not saying that the events here are sooo important but just that they are recognized events. Judgments and decisions are being made based upon these actions. Karma is being made. As far as family members go it will depend upon the quality of contact and the receptivity to that contact. - hope this helps a little. - Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 4, 2007 Report Share Posted August 4, 2007 Chrism and Sarita thank you both for words that may be too kind. It was the intensity of the situations, the K energy was so great that fluorescent lights wouldn't go out when taken out of their lamps. (As far as family members go it will depend upon the quality of contact and the receptivity to that contact. - hope this helps a little. - ) Chrism, how do you talk to family members about this when they don't believe and think you are a bit strange? I live this situation and know that some of her problems are due to residual light being given off. I have to get a PKE meter to make accurate measurements sometime but I know my bio-electromagnetic field is somewhere around 250 times stronger than hers and it overrides her own neural responses. That was as estimation made using a voltmeter. Sarita, Jim Jones was a religious figure best known for leading 911 followers to their deaths in Jonestown, Guyana in 1978. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.