Guest guest Posted September 16, 2007 Report Share Posted September 16, 2007 No not as I understand it to be. For me, the Shaktipat is an intentional act. It is a responsibility and a gift and is not under the little (i) control. It is part of a much larger aspect of Divinity. I asked for the safeties to be a governor of the Shaktipat and it was given. It could have been withheld. The Shaktipat is there for that purpose and that purpose alone. There is no augmentation. It is activation. There is no Aura reading or healing(thats a different action.) The Scatterfield has a connection but isnt feeding energy. The response comes from the effect of that connection upon the individual. Not because it is intended. - Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 16, 2007 Report Share Posted September 16, 2007 Thank you! Love, Angelina , " chrism " <> wrote: > > No not as I understand it to be. For me, the Shaktipat is an > intentional act. It is a responsibility and a gift and is not under > the little (i) control. > > It is part of a much larger aspect of Divinity. I asked for the > safeties to be a governor of the Shaktipat and it was given. It > could have been withheld. > > The Shaktipat is there for that purpose and that purpose alone. > There is no augmentation. It is activation. There is no Aura reading > or healing(thats a different action.) > > The Scatterfield has a connection but isnt feeding energy. The > response comes from the effect of that connection upon the > individual. Not because it is intended. - > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.