Dosage question - Hello Tom

[Guest guest]

The serrvice aspect is more for those outside of your immediate

surroundings or for a spousel ie mutual beneficial expereince. It is

for strangers (typically) and with out a direct or indirect payment

for the services rendered.

 

I do everything that I can in order to NOT have you blown out of your

socks! Thats why there is a Scatterfield. No insult to the person by

means of Shaktipat is allowed. The sitepat can do that though.

 

So please do your practice and try not to gauge the infusion based

upon how you demonstrate or not symptoms. They are a mere by product

of a larger plan. - No dosage increase is needed but that may happen

of its own accord. We are only half way through. - chrism

[Guest guest]

Thanks Chrism!

I'm sorry, " blowing my socks off " was a very inaccurate way of

putting it! Though special effects undeniably have charm at the

time, it's the amount of love I've felt myself radiating (or failing

to radiate) that feels like the lasting value worth measuring.

Scott's love broadcasts really embody this for me, now that's really

getting somewhere!

 

This service thing sends me round in circles though. Receiving K

dividends for service to me sounds like a reward, but how does

desiring and then receiving such a reward not violate the no-payment

principle? I can see how cultivating a knee-jerk reaction of

kindness would let you carry out momentary acts of service without

thinking of reward, but isn't something more premeditated in danger

of constituting a vested interest? This sounds more analytical than

I'm intending, a bit like a robot trying to learn emotions - I know

it's more a feeling or an attitude than a set of rules, but

reproducing the right state feels a bit hit and miss sometimes...

Tom

 

, " chrism "

<> wrote:

>

> The serrvice aspect is more for those outside of your immediate

> surroundings or for a spousel ie mutual beneficial expereince. It

is

> for strangers (typically) and with out a direct or indirect payment

> for the services rendered.

>

> I do everything that I can in order to NOT have you blown out of

your

> socks! Thats why there is a Scatterfield. No insult to the person

by

> means of Shaktipat is allowed. The sitepat can do that though.

>

> So please do your practice and try not to gauge the infusion based

> upon how you demonstrate or not symptoms. They are a mere by

product

> of a larger plan. - No dosage increase is needed but that may

happen

> of its own accord. We are only half way through. - chrism

>

[Guest guest]

Yes Tom, it is like tuning into a distant radio frequency. So it

isn't a " just add water scenario " lol. It is an adoption of a service

for others mentality that supersedes a rewards based mentality. This

is done through practice.

 

Follow Katherine's example in a way as it is the volunteering that can

help one to feel the love first and then the reward becomes less based

in the physical desires and more into the areas of service for others

no matter what is or isn't received. It's a mind shift. A surrendering

to a divine model rather than a " survival needs for myself " based

model. I feel you understand this. - blessings my friend don't let

this stop your progress and do the practice whether you " feel "

anything or not. It is a step by step process here so as not to give

to much to the unconditioned bodies. - chrism