Guest guest Posted February 18, 2008 Report Share Posted February 18, 2008 Here is the message I received after telling that I was not satisfied with their stock answer. The reply came from " Gidget " , lol. Sarita Hello Sarita, Thank you for writing to . I understand you have concerns regarding the placement of the Group, " " . With regard to the placement of groups, there are many determining factors. However, we are unable to provide you with this information. Your concerns have been forwarded to our Production team so that they may investigate and make any appropriate changes. Be sure to check the Official Blog for more information and the latest updates about . http://www.ygroupsblog.com/blog/ Regards, Gidget Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 18, 2008 Report Share Posted February 18, 2008 Well, at least you got a response! I got nothing. Did you go to and click on 'send feedback' to send your message? That's what I did. Was that not the right way to do it? Claudia Sarita <sarita1969 wrote: Here is the message I received after telling that I was not satisfied with their stock answer. The reply came from " Gidget " , lol. Sarita Hello Sarita, Thank you for writing to . I understand you have concerns regarding the placement of the Group, " " . With regard to the placement of groups, there are many determining factors. However, we are unable to provide you with this information. Your concerns have been forwarded to our Production team so that they may investigate and make any appropriate changes. Be sure to check the Official Blog for more information and the latest updates about . http://www.ygroupsblog.com/blog/ Regards, Gidget Be a better friend, newshound, and know-it-all with Mobile. Try it now. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 18, 2008 Report Share Posted February 18, 2008 That's the way I did it too. When they sent me their stock answer, I responded back that I wasn't happy with it and what I posted is what I got back. Oh well, maybe if enough of us bombard them with emails they will do something. Not likely, but it could happen. Sarita , Claudia <newtfoodbowl wrote: > > Well, at least you got a response! I got nothing. Did you go to and click on 'send feedback' to send your message? That's what I did. Was that not the right way to do it? > > Claudia > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 18, 2008 Report Share Posted February 18, 2008 Getting an answer from is like pulling teeth without anesthesia. The reason for the ratings drop is due to the number of HITS the group received. If you look at the numbers for the last 3-4 months we had over 3000 hits. For February is it down some. The group has its ups and downs but its really nothing to be too concerned about. We are very noticable and EASY to find. I used to own several group and I know the frustrations with the ratings and the reason why they fluctuate. Just my 2 cents. Denny , " Sarita " <sarita1969 wrote: > > That's the way I did it too. When they sent me their stock answer, I > responded back that I wasn't happy with it and what I posted is what I > got back. Oh well, maybe if enough of us bombard them with emails they > will do something. Not likely, but it could happen. > > Sarita > > , Claudia > <newtfoodbowl@> wrote: > > > > Well, at least you got a response! I got nothing. Did you go to > and click on 'send feedback' to send your message? That's what I > did. Was that not the right way to do it? > > > > Claudia > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 18, 2008 Report Share Posted February 18, 2008 Hi Denny, I hope you're right because, as you suggest, the " hits " we're getting from postings alone should rank our Group very highly and give lots of pause for thought. But I got this response to my query, this morning: " Although it may appear that groups are arranged solely according to the number of members within the group, there are actually many factors which determine the placement of a group. We are unable to share with you what those determining factors are. I have forwarded your concerns to our Production team so that they may investigate and make any appropriate changes " etc. With respect, it looks like " transparency " isn't 's strong suit! Leaving aside Shakti's sleuth-like abilities, my guess is that most people who find us are now coming via word-of-mouth, from other Groups, Chrism's radio shows and commonly from Google searches that lead to http://www.kundaliniawakeningsystems1.com/, so there's plenty of extra entry points. John. ============================================== Denny wrote: Getting an answer from is like pulling teeth without anesthesia. The reason for the ratings drop is due to the number of HITS the group received. If you look at the numbers for the last 3-4 months we had over 3000 hits. For February is it down some. The group has its ups and downs but its really nothing to be too concerned about. We are very noticable and EASY to find. I used to own several group and I know the frustrations with the ratings and the reason why they fluctuate. Just my 2 cents. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 18, 2008 Report Share Posted February 18, 2008 Your answer was much the same as mine, lol! I think that many of us refer people to this group, many of which have didn't know what Kundalini was. I think all who are supposed to be here will get here one way or the other. When the student is ready... Sarita , " " <...> wrote: > > Hi Denny, I hope you're right because, as you suggest, the " hits " > we're getting from postings alone should rank our Group very highly > and give lots of pause for thought. But I got this response > to my query, this morning: > > " Although it may appear that groups are arranged solely according to > the number of members within the group, there are actually many > factors which determine the placement of a group. We are unable to > share with you what those determining factors are. I have forwarded > your concerns to our Production team so that they may investigate and > make any appropriate changes " etc. > > With respect, it looks like " transparency " isn't 's strong suit! > > Leaving aside Shakti's sleuth-like abilities, my guess is that most > people who find us are now coming via word-of-mouth, from other > Groups, Chrism's radio shows and commonly from Google searches that > lead to http://www.kundaliniawakeningsystems1.com/, so there's > plenty of extra entry points. John. > > ============================================== Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 19, 2008 Report Share Posted February 19, 2008 The Number 1 rated in the Kundalini category has had 1 post for the month of February and 12 posts in January... , " Denny " <dennynorton wrote: > > > Getting an answer from is like pulling teeth without anesthesia. > > The reason for the ratings drop is due to the number of HITS the > group received. If you look at the numbers for the last 3-4 months we > had over 3000 hits. For February is it down some. The group has its > ups and downs but its really nothing to be too concerned about. We > are very noticable and EASY to find. I used to own several > group and I know the frustrations with the ratings and the reason why > they fluctuate. Just my 2 cents. > > Denny > > > , " Sarita " > <sarita1969@> wrote: > > > > That's the way I did it too. When they sent me their stock answer, > I > > responded back that I wasn't happy with it and what I posted is > what I > > got back. Oh well, maybe if enough of us bombard them with emails > they > > will do something. Not likely, but it could happen. > > > > Sarita > > > > , Claudia > > <newtfoodbowl@> wrote: > > > > > > Well, at least you got a response! I got nothing. Did you go to > > and click on 'send feedback' to send your message? That's > what I > > did. Was that not the right way to do it? > > > > > > Claudia > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 19, 2008 Report Share Posted February 19, 2008 The KAS-1 Web Site receives literally thousands of visitors each month. I imagine there are good percentage of these visitors who might be enticed into visiting the group site? , " " <...> wrote: > > Hi Denny, I hope you're right because, as you suggest, the " hits " > we're getting from postings alone should rank our Group very highly > and give lots of pause for thought. But I got this response > to my query, this morning: > > " Although it may appear that groups are arranged solely according to > the number of members within the group, there are actually many > factors which determine the placement of a group. We are unable to > share with you what those determining factors are. I have forwarded > your concerns to our Production team so that they may investigate and > make any appropriate changes " etc. > > With respect, it looks like " transparency " isn't 's strong suit! > > Leaving aside Shakti's sleuth-like abilities, my guess is that most > people who find us are now coming via word-of-mouth, from other > Groups, Chrism's radio shows and commonly from Google searches that > lead to http://www.kundaliniawakeningsystems1.com/, so there's > plenty of extra entry points. John. > > ============================================== > > Denny wrote: > > Getting an answer from is like pulling teeth without anesthesia. > > The reason for the ratings drop is due to the number of HITS the > group received. If you look at the numbers for the last 3-4 months we > had over 3000 hits. For February is it down some. The group has its > ups and downs but its really nothing to be too concerned about. We > are very noticable and EASY to find. I used to own several > group and I know the frustrations with the ratings and the reason why > they fluctuate. Just my 2 cents. > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 19, 2008 Report Share Posted February 19, 2008 Not to mention that many of the groups listed when you search aren't even related to Kundalini! Sarita , " gleno " <gleno wrote: > > The Number 1 rated in the Kundalini category has had 1 > post for the month of February and 12 posts in January... > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 19, 2008 Report Share Posted February 19, 2008 Hi Sarita, When performing a search, this is the only site that talks about the GFA that I could find, so far. You mentioned in a previous email that you like the jolts and I do as well ~ the stronger ~ the better! Kind regards...Angelina , " Sarita " <sarita1969 wrote: > > Not to mention that many of the groups listed when you search aren't > even related to Kundalini! > > Sarita > > , " gleno " > <gleno@> wrote: > > > > The Number 1 rated in the Kundalini category has had 1 > > post for the month of February and 12 posts in January... > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.