Kundalini is a ten thousand year old tradition? -Ryan

[Guest guest]

Thank for your clear and concise inquiries Ryan. My response may

not have those characteristics for you and if this is so I apologize

in advance.

 

We must remember that the Sanskrit language is a multi plat formed

communication with equal parts of devotional and genuflective

aspects. It operates on more than the written word and meaning and

permeates and activates certain qualities that aids its

understanding. It is healing to the reader and communicative towards

God. The God with in and the God without. There is so much to be

experienced with the utterance of a single word.

 

Memory engrams can be reactivated due to the reading of certain

Sanskrit words or phrases that will not correspond with the current

individual life experience that has been lived but is representative

of other existence. This is what happens to me when I read certain

Vedic material. For instance:

 

" Amrita " as is mentioned in various ways in the Rig Veda and is

what can be experienced when the Kundalini reaches a specific gland

in the brain and is also referred to a " milk of the Goddess " or

the " nectar of the Gods " among other names. When the ancient Vedic's

write of this they do so in very poetic phrases as I mentioned in a

previous post.

 

For one who is active with awakened Kundalini this makes perfect

sense as it is these areas of the human being, among many others,

that are triggered into expression by the Kundalini. Remember the

intelligence of the Kundalini as an intellect in its own right. The

core code with in the person so to say. And you can begin to see

that it isn't meant for those unaltered by Kundalini to have a

complete understanding of the Rig Veda or many of the ancient texts,

which from my perspective is replete with Kundalini references

including the afore mentioned example of Amrita.

 

So the K awakened person knows this as a clear message from the

writers to the awakened one reading the phrase. And this message

also comes through as waves of bliss in my experience for the K

active person. This bliss is triggered not only by what is written

but by the energetic signatures and Kundalini of those who wrote it.

This is why I suggest that it takes a Kundalini awakened individual

to understand what has been written by the ancient Vedic's when it

comes to the Kundalini.

 

I feel that it would be very difficult to be able to decipher using

the " mental mind " alone what is really being offered in the texts

especially as it concerns the Kundalini. -blessings Ryan - chrism

 

Kundalini-Awakening-Systems-

1 , " thecontemplative " <thecontemplative wrote:

>

> Hi Chrism

>

> > [the Rg-Veda is a] great read to " feel " . - blessings Ryan -

chrism

>

[Guest guest]

Hi Chrism,

 

> Thank for your clear and concise inquiries Ryan. My response may

> not have those characteristics for you and if this is so I

>apologize in advance.

 

No apology needed. While you are correct that it doesn't help much in

terms of my search for evidence of Kundalini-specific-references

prior to say 500 C.E., it was nonetheless a very interesting post.

 

> Memory engrams can be reactivated due to the reading of certain

> Sanskrit words or phrases that will not correspond with the current

> individual life experience that has been lived but is

>representative of other existence. This is what happens to me when I

>read certain Vedic material.

 

If I am reading you correctly, you are saying that there is an

essential power within the Sanskrit language and that texts composed

in it can have bits of spiritual information encoded (for lack of a

better word) within them. Further, you are saying that

this " information " can resonate with the individuals psycho-spiritual

make up with powerful effects.

 

If this is a reasonably accurate rephrasing of your ideas, I would

comment that this is certainly a traditional viewpoint within various

branches of Indic spirituality. It is also a " personal belief " I hold

to be true.

 

> " Amrita " as is mentioned in various ways in the Rig Veda and is

> what can be experienced when the Kundalini reaches a specific gland

> in the brain and is also referred to a " milk of the Goddess " or

> the " nectar of the Gods " among other names. When the ancient

Vedic's

> write of this they do so in very poetic phrases as I mentioned in a

 

 

The Sanskrit word amrta is a polysemous term to be sure. I feel that

among the various meanings, the term amrta is used to refer to both

an external " nectar " and to an internal " nectar " . I believe that

kundalini-specific-texts tend to refer to the " internal " . I've seen

no convincing evidence that the original meaning of the Rg-

Veda's " amrta " was anything other than an external " nectar " or its

archetypal divine prototype (i.e. " soma " )

 

For what is worth, I personally believe that external and internal

amrta may be the same thing (or very similar things) and it is merely

a question of an exogenous or endogenous sources.

 

On the other hand, interpreting the Rg-Veda as referring to internal

amrta has become a common hermeneutic technique in later Indian

interpretive traditions. To me it is very unclear that such a

polyvalent use of the term was intended originally.

 

As to the idea that ancient spiritual texts can only be understood by

people with awakened kundalini, I would tend to disagree. I feel that

what is needed to fully understand these texts is actually some

degree of " spiritual realization " . In my opinion, it does not matter

if this realization was triggered by kundalini or another cause.

Moreover, many folks can have quite active kundalini without yet

having any significant " spiritual realization " . This is of course

just a statement of my personal beliefs.

 

Chrism, thank for your wonderful and thought provoking reply,

Ryan

[Guest guest]

Yes I agree with you Ryan regarding the ability for others to

understand some of the ancient books with out the awakened Kundalini.

I was pointing to those that I feel concern it (the Kundalini)

directly. Nice to read you have similar experiences when reading some

of these texts!- blessings and namaste to you Ryan! - chrism

 

Kundalini-Awakening-Systems-

1 , " thecontemplative " <thecontemplative wrote:

>

> Hi Chrism, .

>

> No apology needed. While you are correct that it doesn't help much

in

> terms of my search for evidence of Kundalini-specific-references

> prior to say 500 C.E., it was nonetheless a very interesting post.

>

>

[Guest guest]

>- blessings and namaste to you Ryan! - chrism

 

Ditto.

 

Chrism, I have say you seem to be a beautiful person to talk to. Full

of energy, love and light. You seem to uplift those you talk with.

 

Ryan

[Guest guest]

I second and third that! ;-)

 

Sarita

 

Kundalini-Awakening-Systems-

1 , " thecontemplative " <thecontemplative wrote:

>

>

>

> >- blessings and namaste to you Ryan! - chrism

>

> Ditto.

>

> Chrism, I have say you seem to be a beautiful person to talk to.

Full

> of energy, love and light. You seem to uplift those you talk with.

>

> Ryan

>