Parallels between atomic theory and spirituality

[Guest guest]

recently raised the subject of covalence, and the parallels

between atomic theory and our `whole' being have been rumbling around

in my mind for some time now. We are energy bodies composed of parts

in different states of vibration, with the densest part being our

physical body – the chunk stuck largely in the Newtonian mode (or

linear mode as chrism would say) with some `mind-related self imposed'

time and space constraints. Obviously on the physical front we are

made up of masses of atoms combined to form molecules, and those then

combine to form useful structures (like DNA and cells and all the

rest), but in essence we just a universe of structured atoms.

 

Atoms comprise a central nucleus of protons and neutrons and a few

exotic extras, and around this nucleus are electrons on progressively

higher energy levels, with the electrons existing between particulate

and wave form but essentially just energy. In the nucleus or more

specifically on breaking some of the components of the nucleus some

new particles come into being and these do not necessarily obey

Newtonian laws in terms of linear time i.e. time reversals can occur

when they come into being.

 

So then – the parallels. Our physical body is akin to the nucleus –

the solid chunk at the centre and with a positive charge. The

electrons at varying energy levels parallel our other bodies or high

self and carry the opposite charge to the nucleus or our physical.

Cross reference this to the kundalini or Shakti energy closely tied in

with our physical body having the opposite and feminine charge to the

male prana energy (opposite polarities once again). Atoms in their

base state are neutrally charged i.e. positive and negative charges

balance – the duality being one. The electrons exist on different

energy levels and can move between levels depending on circumstances –

again cross reference this to the frequency levels of our higher

bodies or high self. The move away from linear time on `cracking'

some nuclear particles during which time goes backwards (relatively

speaking) emphasizes the `mind' limitations sometimes of our physical

thinking.

 

So then the conundrum or question (it had to come didn't it?) – as

energy bodies clearly based on atomic structures and therefore

governed by all that goes with quantum physics, can we assume that our

high frequency high self is inextricably linked to our dense physical

body vibrating on a lower plane i.e. without a nucleus you don't have

an atom? If so is there an inseparable symbiotic relationship between

high and low self? What happens to the physical body when we die (and

here I am not talking about the decomposition of the physical

structures but that portion of us that contains the one polarity that

the high self needs to be one)? Can we exist in an unbalanced state

so to speak? If so and we don't reincarnate but move to higher planes

what happens to the balance between polarities (the male / female or

Shakti / prana combination)?

 

Any insight?

 

Blessings

 

Jonathan

[Guest guest]

Please see below seaprated by @@

 

physical

> body vibrating on a lower plane i.e. without a nucleus you don't

have

> an atom?

 

@@ Yes I feel that can be a safe conclusion without understanding

the importance of " consciousness " . " @@

 

If so is there an inseparable symbiotic relationship between

> high and low self?

 

@@ Yes there is a relationship though " inseparable " may not be the

word I would select. Separating does not always imply solitude.imho.

Symbiotic is a good word though for we serve them as they assist

us.@@

 

What happens to the physical body when we die (and

> here I am not talking about the decomposition of the physical

> structures but that portion of us that contains the one polarity

that

> the high self needs to be one)?

 

@@ High Self is already one or " at one " . It is we the aspect of

creation that is striving for this wholeness frequency and the high

Self is there to assist us get there and this is often achieved by

the Kundalini and the divine marriage.@@

 

Can we exist in an unbalanced state

> so to speak?

 

@@ We are existing in unbalanced states. It is through the Kundalini

that balance can be retained.@@

 

 

If so and we don't reincarnate but move to higher planes

> what happens to the balance between polarities (the male / female

or

> Shakti / prana combination)?

 

@@ We are able to take that which propels us forward or

towards the oneness and we can discard or leave that which isnt

useful. Though it isnt uncommon for a person to keep a certain

frequency of garbage in order to pay a specific Karmic debt. Please

do not buy into the erroneous idea that by activating the Kundalini

all Karma is forgiven. This is not so. We still pay our karmic debts

but with more of an enlightened consciousness in doing so.

 

Physical polaric issues die with the death of the body. These are

not always kept as attachments when entering the heavenly fields.

Though they may be used in planning the next venture they are there

as mere tools and do not have the flavor of the life just lived

unless a Karmic debt is connected to them. Polaric issues are used

as a palette of options that the soul paints the next life with

keeping in mind the achievements and challenges that were retained

and remain.

 

Shakti and Prana are more closely aligned to the physical expression

and though they may play a part in the development of the next fetus

they are more of an expression of the physical opportunities that we

have as limited sense physical beings. Yet Prana and Shakti do have

a place in the afterlife as the sacredness of the Male and Female

are honored but this is still focused within the workings of this

specific place of interaction in the physical. - my take on it

Jonathan! Such great questions! - blessings to you in Africa! -

chrism

 

 

> So then the conundrum or question (it had to come didn't it?) – as

> energy bodies clearly based on atomic structures and therefore

> governed by all that goes with quantum physics, can we assume that

our

> high frequency high self is inextricably linked to our dense

 

>

> Any insight?

>

> Blessings

>

> Jonathan

>

[Guest guest]

Hi Jonathon, I'm wondering if the force field or higher self which

shadows the body is truly symbiotic defined in the sense that for

mutual survival, one needs the other. In a deceased person with

unawakened Kundalini, does the potential for an Awakening die also?

or more generally does the very existence of static energy die when

its conductor ceases to exist?

 

 

Could it be for the unawakened individual, that the electrons or

Shakti don't have one-on-one symbiotic body dependence, but, rather,

are latent in much the same way as a charge or an aura of static

electricity can build or recede asymptotically in proportion to

strength of the conductor's force field. Perhaps at the death of the

body, the imprint of the Higher Self survives, albeit in entity

format, awaiting expression through re-attachment or reincarnation.

 

My guess is that in contrast, in a Kundalini awakened person, the

evolving Kundalini starts widening the orbit of the body's

perceptions so as to merge with the aura of the higher self. The

death of the body then allows a clear and clean pathway for

expression of the consummated shiva and shakti at a point closer to

enlightenment or to whatever cultural destination seems appropriate

to the person's spiritual pathway.

 

 

On a related subject where you refer to " linear time and time

reversals " , the following thought occurred to me: Were we situated on

a far distant planet from Earth and had a sufficiently powerful

telescope to see Earth's daily activities, the constraint on what we

would see would be distortions inevitably tied to the speed of light.

So, dependent on the number of light years separating " them " and

" us " , we could be seen as dinosaurs battling to the death in

prehistoric jungles, or cave men and women blundering around with

stone age tools or perhaps knights on horseback jousting in the

Battle of Hastings.

 

Each would be a snapshot of who we were, as a relative truth - but a

distortion of any absolute reality, an illusion. This seems to mean

that ALL material things are perceptions, split second readings by

subjective sets of eyes and ears in a spinning kaleidoscope of time

and space, where " realities " are nonsensical.

 

It also has bearings on telepathy, clairvoyance, retrocognition and

healing transmissions - none of which would be subject to the laws

dictating the speeds of light and sound, thus time reversals by

'sensitives' (humans and entities) using transcendental energy

forces, one source of which would be kundalini, are entirely

feasible.

 

 

There are numerous references, by the way, to electron activity in

http://biologyofkundalini.com . Jonathon, thanks for a very

challenging posting. Best wishes - John.

 

==============================

 

 

Jonathon wrote: " .........on the subject of covalence, and the

parallels between atomic theory and our `whole' being have been

rumbling around in my mind for some time now. We are energy bodies

composed of parts in different states of vibration, with the densest

part being our physical body – the chunk stuck largely in the

Newtonian mode (or linear mode as chrism would say) with some `mind-

related self imposed'time and space constraints........

and wave form but essentially just energy .... these do not

necessarily obey Newtonian laws in terms of linear time i.e. time

reversals can occur. ..................... The move away from linear

time on `cracking' some nuclear particles during which time goes

backwards (relatively speaking) emphasizes the `mind' limitations

sometimes of our physical thinking. .............. Is there an

inseparable symbiotic relationship between high and low self? What

happens to the physical body when we die (and here I am not talking

about the decomposition of the physical structures but that portion

of us that contains the one polarity that the high self needs to be

one)? Can we exist in an unbalanced state > so to speak? If so and

we don't reincarnate but move to higher planes what happens to the

balance between polarities (the male / female or Shakti / prana

combination)? Any insight? Blessings Jonathan. "

>