Guest guest Posted August 17, 2008 Report Share Posted August 17, 2008 I hope it is okay to mention Polyamory in relation to the Kundalini. The reason I bring this up is that I have a Polyamorous friend who claims that during her 'sessions' it awoke her k, and she would work with it and Tantra to heighten her experiences. Sadly for her her husband left her and set up with one of the other women in the group, with whom he later had children. I have nothing against people doing what they want s & *ually but this method of working with K caused her a lot of heartache and jealousy - all negative emotions. I have not mentioned to her the work I am doing with K, but I know her method would not suit me and surely it is wisest to work on the K awakening by yourself, and get used to the energies, do the safeties and Tibetans before involving one or more people to join you that way? What do others think? LS, x Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 17, 2008 Report Share Posted August 17, 2008 Yes Kundalini in this sense is an individual journey. This goes back to the idea of awakening a spouse from the s & xual activities. Whether polyamorous or not it can become an issue if the partner is unconsciously receptive to the Kundalini. As that receptivity is stimulated by another persons awakened Kundalini troubles can arise though there is no guarantee as issues will be brought into the open that will need balancing but will often result in the increase of difficulties as the issues are magnified instead of balanced. Polyamory of itself is merely a form of s & xual addiction that involves more than one couple. Poly pods that use Tantra in conjunction with s & x and in the seeking of the Kundalini with out the guidelines of love for the principles of the sacred aspects of the Divine Union can be even worse as it is used to " heighten experiences " for mere sensaton. I feel this is a direction of manipulating the org & smic response. The disasters can arise from a narcissistic attitude of using sacred traditions and systems as ways towards mere pleasure rather than in understanding the full ramification of the system of activity. Similar to using a nuclear device for a BBQ because it cooks so well. Tantra for the sake of manipulation of s & xual issues can become an unfortunate path when searching for mere sensate fulfillment. Polyamory and Kundalini do not mix very well unless everyone involved is consciously pursuing the Kundalini. Without the veil of s%xual titillation or promiscuity or the need for a little " strange " in a relationship. This is depending upon the accepted morality structure of the society. We are often taught that as a species humans are naturally monogamous. This may not necessarily be the case. Some cultures are and some cultures are not. Some use the examples of the herds of animals as a way of proving that monogamy isn't the only way and others look to the monogamous examples. This really isn't the issue when it comes to Kundalini. Being within the integrity of your culture is what matters. Being within the moral structure as is defined in your culture is the important quality. It is the issue of " knowledge afore activity " as a conscious approach to Kundalini activation via s & xual interactions that can prove beneficial. In many ancient cultures the temple priestess was the purveyor of a Kundalini type experience and one aspect was of the " congress of flesh " with her. Incorrectly branded as a " temple hoar " by other cultures she was indeed a sacred fixture of, and a representation of, the sacred feminine. Same with the temple males if it was a society that was gender equal. - , " Skydancer " <ionaskydancer wrote: > > I hope it is okay to mention Polyamory in relation to the Kundalini. > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 18, 2008 Report Share Posted August 18, 2008 At 03:14 PM 8/17/2008, you wrote: Being within the integrity of your culture is what matters. Being within the moral structure as is defined in your culture is the important quality. Can I disagree on this one? I would say being within the integrity of *your* moral code is what matters. My moral code is definitely not in harmony with the prevailing moral code of what I see as my " culture " . I see a lot of ambiguous morality reflected in the popular culture. It really seems to be " if it feels good, do it " . The religious culture I was raised in was *not* ambiguous, but it's uptight, fear-based and downright bigoted, especially where it comes to the role of women and treatment of homosexuals. I personally would not be happy in a polyamourous relationship, because that is outside my moral and ethical code (not to mention my safety zone) .... but that has nothing to do with my " culture " . Brandi Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.