Jump to content
IndiaDivine.org

Polyamory & Kundalini

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

I hope it is okay to mention Polyamory in relation to the Kundalini.

The reason I bring this up is that I have a Polyamorous friend who

claims that during her 'sessions' it awoke her k, and she would work

with it and Tantra to heighten her experiences. Sadly for her her

husband left her and set up with one of the other women in the group,

with whom he later had children.

 

I have nothing against people doing what they want s & *ually but this

method of working with K caused her a lot of heartache and jealousy -

all negative emotions.

 

I have not mentioned to her the work I am doing with K, but I know her

method would not suit me and surely it is wisest to work on the K

awakening by yourself, and get used to the energies, do the safeties

and Tibetans before involving one or more people to join you that way?

 

What do others think?

LS, x

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes Kundalini in this sense is an individual journey. This goes

back to the idea of awakening a spouse from the s & xual activities.

Whether polyamorous or not it can become an issue if the partner is

unconsciously receptive to the Kundalini. As that receptivity is

stimulated by another persons awakened Kundalini troubles can arise

though there is no guarantee as issues will be brought into the open

that will need balancing but will often result in the increase of

difficulties as the issues are magnified instead of balanced.

 

Polyamory of itself is merely a form of s & xual addiction that

involves more than one couple. Poly pods that use Tantra in

conjunction with s & x and in the seeking of the Kundalini with out

the guidelines of love for the principles of the sacred aspects of

the Divine Union can be even worse as it is used to " heighten

experiences " for mere sensaton. I feel this is a direction of

manipulating the org & smic response. The disasters can arise from a

narcissistic attitude of using sacred traditions and systems as ways

towards mere pleasure rather than in understanding the full

ramification of the system of activity. Similar to using a nuclear

device for a BBQ because it cooks so well.

 

Tantra for the sake of manipulation of s & xual issues can become an

unfortunate path when searching for mere sensate fulfillment.

Polyamory and Kundalini do not mix very well unless everyone

involved is consciously pursuing the Kundalini. Without the veil of

s%xual titillation or promiscuity or the need for a little " strange "

in a relationship. This is depending upon the accepted morality

structure of the society.

 

We are often taught that as a species humans are naturally

monogamous. This may not necessarily be the case. Some cultures are

and some cultures are not. Some use the examples of the herds of

animals as a way of proving that monogamy isn't the only way and

others look to the monogamous examples. This really isn't the issue

when it comes to Kundalini. Being within the integrity of your

culture is what matters. Being within the moral structure as is

defined in your culture is the important quality.

 

It is the issue of " knowledge afore activity " as a conscious

approach to Kundalini activation via s & xual interactions that can

prove beneficial. In many ancient cultures the temple priestess was

the purveyor of a Kundalini type experience and one aspect was of

the " congress of flesh " with her. Incorrectly branded as a " temple

hoar " by other cultures she was indeed a sacred fixture of, and a

representation of, the sacred feminine. Same with the temple males

if it was a society that was gender equal. -

 

, " Skydancer "

<ionaskydancer wrote:

>

> I hope it is okay to mention Polyamory in relation to the

Kundalini.

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

At 03:14 PM 8/17/2008, you wrote:

Being within the integrity of

your

culture is what matters. Being within the moral structure as is

defined in your culture is the important quality.

Can I disagree on this one? I would say being within the integrity of

*your* moral code is what matters. My moral code is definitely not in

harmony with the prevailing moral code of what I see as my

" culture " . I see a lot of ambiguous morality reflected in the

popular culture. It really seems to be " if it feels good, do

it " . The religious culture I was raised in was *not* ambiguous, but

it's uptight, fear-based and downright bigoted, especially where it comes

to the role of women and treatment of homosexuals.

I personally would not be happy in a polyamourous relationship, because

that is outside my moral and ethical code (not to mention my safety zone)

.... but that has nothing to do with my " culture " .

Brandi

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...